>> > > GREAT NIGHT, WE WILL CERTAINLY PHONE CALL THE DURHAM CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE TO ORDER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2013, AT 7:07 P.M. > > WELL, WE CERTAINLY WANT TO THANK ALL OF YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME. > > AGAIN, THIS IS A TUBL ISSUE.
>> > > GOOD EVENING, WE WILL CERTAINLY TELEPHONE CALL THE DURHAM CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO ORDER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2013, AT 7:07 P.M. > > YES. > > I OBTAIN TO REMARK? > > LET ME ASK, ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS BY MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL? > > THANK YOU, MAYOR PRO TEM, FO SHARING THAT DETAILS.> > HAVE YOU BELIEVED ABOUT INCORPORATING SOME SORT OF SPAC TO AID TRAINEES, IF THAT IS TH DESIRE OF THE COMMUNITY? > > ALL. > > IT IS 440-SOME ACRES AS LISTED.
> > YOU ' RE WELCOME. > > HAVE YOU BELIEVED ABOUT INCORPORATING SOME KIND OF SPAC TO ASSIST TRAINEES, IF THAT IS TH NEED OF THE AREA? > > THANK YOU, MR.MAYOR, PARTICIPANT OF COUNCIL. > > MR. MAYOR I LIVED IN THIS AREA ON BIRCH OPPORTUNITY FO ABOUT FIVE YEARS. > > ALL.I PROCLAIM THE GENERAL PUBLIC CONFERENCE CLOSED. I WILL CERTAINLY MAKE MY REMARKS BEFORE W VOTE. I PRESUME WE OBTAIN A GREAT DEAL OF GROWTHS, A GREAT DEAL OF INTENDS THAT ARE BROUGHT BEFORE United States IN TERMS OF PREPARATION AS WELL AS POINTS THAT WILL HAPPEN.I HAVE BEEN TYPE OF INTRIGUED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT. BECAUSE THIS IS NEW TO OUR COMMUNITY IN REQUISITES OF A GREAT DEAL OF DEVELOPMENT AND FOLLOWERS. CANISTER YOU ADVISE United States AS TO HOW MAN UNITS ARE PLANNED FOR THIS? > > 1,314. I BELIEVE WE ARE AT 1,300 NOW. WITH >> WHAT WE HAVE ON PAPER. WEBSITE INTENDS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR REGARDING 2/3 OF IT. 750. AS WELL AS IF IF YOU REMEMBER, THERE ARE SEVERAL PARCELS THAT ARE STILL UNDER A POSTPONEMENT THAT WE CONTAINER ' T SUBMIT A SITE STRATEGY ON QUITE YET. BUT STAGE ONE HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED. THE INFRASTRUCTURE REMAINS IN PLACE. AS WELL AS IT IS FOR 220-SOME-ODD UNITS. REGIONAL PUMP TERMINAL FOR BASE 25 IS BEING BUILT. > > YOU HAD I DON ' T KNOW >> IF IT IS A RIBBON CUTTING OR OPEN RESIDENCE OR WHATEVER A FEW WEEKS AGO IN WHICH PEOPLE APPEARED TO LOOK? > > WE HAD AN OPEN RESIDENCE. I WASN ' T WELCOMED TO >> IT. THAT IS An INDIVIDUAL DIG AT MY CLIENT. THERE WAS AN OPEN HOME EXPECTING ABOUT A THOUSAND INDIVIDUALS TO THE BASIC PUBLIC TO PRESENT THE DEL WEBB CAROLINA ARBORS TO THEM. OVER 2500 PEOPLE FINISHED UP TURNING UP. MASS TURMOIL. > > WELL, I THOUGHT THAT WAS IMPRESSIVE TO SEE THOSE KIND OF NUMBERS FOR A TASK THAT IS BEING RECOMMENDED. I ' M CERTAIN THE SIGNATURE NAME DEL WEBB HAD QUITE A LITTLE BIT TO DO WITH IT. THE FACT THAT IT IS BELOW IN DURHAM, WE EXPECT IT ULTIMATELY OPENING.I THOUGHT IT WAS REALLY OUTSTANDING TO ME THAT YOU HAVE THAT MANY INDIVIDUAL COME OUT TO LOOK AT
SOMETHING PLANNED AND PROPOSED FOR THE COMMUNITY. > > MANY THANKS, MAYOR. ONE LITTLE AD. , if YOU GO OUT TO CAROLINA ARBORS.. YOU WILL SEE A SALES CENTER. >> DO NOT THINK THAT IS THE CLUBHOUSE. THAT IS THE CLUBHOUSE OF MOST TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS THIS DIMENSION. THAT IS A SHORT-LIVED CONDITION. IT WILL BE REMOVED. WE ' RE CURRENTLY GETTING APPROVALS ON A CLUB THAT I 38,000 SQUARE FEET. BOTH INDOOR AND ALSO OUTSIDE POOLS, RUNNING AREA, TRACK ABOVE IT, GYM. IT IS A FULL BUNDLE. IT IS NOT– IT IS NOT YOUR TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL ADVANCEMENT. > > WELL, THANK YOU. I BELIEVED IT WAS IMPRESSIVE TO ME. I WISHED TO SHARE THAT IN WHAT IS> BEING PROPOSED. > > I WISH TO SAY THANKS TO THE COUNCIL AND ALSO TEAM. BOTH HAVE FUNCTIONED VERY HARD >> IN GETTING US TO THIS FACTOR TODAY.I INTEND TO THANKS PERSONALLY. > > OK. I ENTERTAIN A MOVEMENT ON THE PRODUCT.
CORRECTLY MOVED AS WELL AS SECONDED. >> MADAM CLERK, OPEN THE BALLOT. SHUT THE VOTE. > > IT PASSES 6-0. > > OK. >> I ' M GOING TO >> MOVE– RATHER THAN GOING TO THING 25, I WANT TO MOV TO THING 26. 26. CONSOLIDATED ANNEXATION PRODUCT: 2207 WEB PAGE ROAD WATER TOWE >> > > THANKS, MR. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. RUB YOUTHFUL ONCE MORE WITH THE PREPARING DEPARTMENT. THIS IS THE CONSOLIDATED ANNEXATION PRODUCT PERTAINING TO THE PROPOSED CITY OF DURHAM WATER TOWER 2207 PAGE ROAD. IT INCLUDES A VOLUNTEER ANNEXATION APPLICATION AS WELL AS INITIAL ZONING TO RURAL RESIDENTIAL, WHICH IS THE LEAST INTENSE ZONING IN THE DEVELOPMENT TIER TO PERMIT THE PROPOSED USE. TEAM ADVISES THE COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE VOLUNTEER ADDITION. 2207 WEB PAGE WATER TOWER AS WELL AS ENJOY TO RESPONSE QUESTIONS. >> > > PUBLIC HEARING. I ASK FIRST, IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS BY MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL? OTHERWISE, ANY INDIVIDUAL IN THE PUBLIC WISH TO PROMOTE OR AGAINST? NOBODY IN THE PUBLIC ASKED TO SPEAK.I DECLARE THE
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. MATTER IS BEFORE THE COUNCIL. EFFECTIVELY RELOCATED AND SECONDED. OPEN THE BALLOT. SHUT THE VOTE. >> > > PASSES 6-0. WE ACTION TO ITEM 25. THE LAST PRODUCT ON THE PROGRAM. 25. ZONING MAP CHANGE-CAROLINA CROSSING II (Z1200004) >> > > FOR THE LAST TIME TONIGHT, RUB YOUTHFUL. IT IS A DEMAND TO MODIFICATION THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF 5.033 PARCEL ON FERRINGTON ROADWAY. FROM THE PRESENT DESIGNATION OF RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN 20 TO OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL WITH A DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THIS RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IS IN THE RURAL TRANSPORTATION LOCATION. THE DEMAND FOLLOWS THE FUTURE LAND USAGE CLASSIFICATION OF THE EXTENSIVE PLAN.OTHER EMBRACED PLANS AND REGULATIONS. THERE ASK A GROWTH PLAN RELATED TO THIS INSTANCE THAT INCLUDE DEDICATIONS. NOT LIMITED TO HIGHWAY ENHANCEMENTS, PER THE SUGGESTION OF THE TRAFFIC EFFECT EVALUATIONS AND ALSO LONG-RANGE BICYCLE PLAN. AND ALSO A DEDICATION TO LIMITATIONS OF USES TO TWO OFFICE COMPLEX ACCORDING TO THE COMPACT COMMUNITY RATE STANDARDS. PERSONNEL IDENTIFIES THIS REQUEST I CONSTANT WITH THE DETAILED PLAN AND OTHER EMBRACED PLANS AS WELL AS ORDINANCES AT THEIR JULY 9, 2013, CONFERENCE, THE REFERRAL OF THE DENIA 8-4. I WILL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS? > > THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING >>. I DECLARE THE GENERAL PUBLIC HEARING HOPE.– PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. I ASK IF STAFF HAS INQUIRIES. I HAVE 4 INDIVIDUALS SIGNED UP T SPEAK– ALLOW ME TO BACK UP. THREE PERSONS JOINED TO SPEA IN ASSISTANCE OF THE ITEM. EXISTS ANYBODY ELSE THAT DESIRED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE THING TRYING TO GET A SENSE OF TIMING? IF YOU WEAR ' T MIND, COULD YOU MOST LIKELY TO THE CLERK ' S DESK AS WELL AS OBTAIN A CARD, PLEASE. I HAVE FOUR PERSONS AUTHORIZED U TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT. I HAVE 2 INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE REGISTERED TO SPEAK IN– LET ME BACK UP.I HAVE ROSEMARY COOKING AREA. IS SHE PRESENT? ARE YOU
IN ASSISTANCE OR AGAINST? YOU ' RE IN SUPPORT? SO THAT MAKES FIVE. I HAVE ONE INDIVIDUAL REGISTERED TO TALK AGAINST THIS ITEM. THAT IS VAN NOR. EXISTS ANYONE ELSE THAT INTENDED TO TALK AGAINST THIS PRODUCT? YOU REMAIN IN OPPOSITION? PERMIT ME TO REDO MY NUMBERS, THEN. MS. COOKING AREA, YOU ARE IN OPPOSITION TO IT? ARE YOU AGAINST THIS? YOU ARE IN SUPPORT OF IT? I WILL CERTAINLY DETERMINE HOW TO DO YOU. LET'' S ACCOMPLISH THIS. I WILL ALLOW 15 MINUTES ON EACH SIDE FOR THIS PRODUCT. I CALL KEN SPALDING, CARROLL LEWELL LEWELLYN, PRIEST JACK HUGHES AN WOMAN THAT IS AT THE DESK. FOR OR AGAINST? AGAINST. OK. >> > > EXCELLENT NIGHT, MR. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, MY NAME IS KENNETH SPALDING, I REPRESENT THE APPLICANT IN THIS MATTER. THE CANDIDATE IS SEEKING TO STICK TO THE CITY COUNCIL, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, RESIDENTS, PLANNING STAFF HAVE AGREED WOUL BE THE BEST LAND USAGE FOR THIS PLACE AND ALSO THIS PROPERTY.OFFICE ORGANIZATION. YOUR PLANNING TEAM HAS CAREFULLY AS WELL AS EXTENSIVELY EVALUATED THIS APPLICATION AS WELL AS HAVE FOUND IT TO BE ABSOLUTELY CONSTANT WITH ALL OF YOUR ESTABLISHED AS WELL AS ENACTED POLICIES. THIS REZONING WILL ALSO ALLOW FOR THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE OPPORTUNITY WHEREIN THE DEVELOPER WILL BE CONTRIBUTING FROM THE ECONOMIC SECTOR APPROXIMATELY$1 MILLION FOR SUBSTANTIAL AND ALSO SUBSTANTIAL AND QUITE FRANKLY, MUCH-NEEDED ROAD ENHANCEMENTS. OUR TAX OBLIGATION BASE WILL BE SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVED BECAUSE OF THE SUBSTANTIAL PAYMENT TO DURHAM ' S TAX OBLIGATION BASE. THIS REZONING AS WELL AS ITS ROAD ENHANCEMENTS WILL MATCH TH LONG-RANGE PLANS OF THE I-4054 CORRIDOR STUDY BY WORKING AS AN IMPROVEMENT AS THE DISCUSSION CONTINUES IN THE PROPOSED CENTER. THIS REZONING HAS ACTUALLY BEEN PASSED. IT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND OUR LOCAL D.O.T. SPECIFICALLY, THIS REZONING WILL PROVIDE FOR EXISTING and present RENOVATIONS AS THE STATE PROCEEDS TO LOCATE APPROPRIATIONS FOR NECESSARY ROADWAY RENOVATIONS ACROSS ALL 100 REGIONS OF THIS STATE. IN CONCLUSION WE FEEL THIS REZONING WILL GIVE THE CITY OF DURHAM SIGNIFICANT, CURRENT BENEFITS THAT WILL CERTAINLY BE FELT IN MANY WAYS FOR LOTS, YEARS TO COME.WE RESPECTFULLY SEEK AND REQUES AUTHORIZATION OF THIS REZONING AS PER YOUR PRESENT PLANS, YOUR REGULATIONS, AS WELL AS ESTABLISH DURHAM CITY COUNCIL LAND USAGE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THANK YOU, WE WOULD HOPE THAT YOU WOULD LISTEN NOW TO EARL LEWELLYN WHO WILL TALK LARGELY WHEN DRIVING RENOVATIONS WHICH ARE A CONCER AND ALSO RATE OF INTEREST TO THE CITIZENS OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. > > GOOD EVENING, I ' M EARL LEWELLYN, WEB TRAFFIC ENGINEER WITH KIMBERLY HORN ASSOCIATE LOCATED AT 200 NORTH MAGNUM STREET HERE IN DURHAM. I PREPARED THE TIA WHICH HAS ACTUALLY BEEN REVIEWED BY NCDOT AS WELL AS DURHAM TRANSPORTATION STAFF. WE KNOW THIS AREA IS CONGESTED DURING PEAK HOURS. I WON ' T STAND UP BELOW AS WELL AS INFORM YOU ANYTHING VARIOUS THAN THAT. WHAT I WOULD LOVE TO DO IS BEGI SETTING IN PERSPECTIVE, THE IMPACT OF THIS WEBSITE. THIS SITE WEBSITE TRAFFIC WILL INCLUDE ONLY 2.7%INCREASE IN THE WEB TRAFFIC ON NC 54. IN ENHANCEMENT TO THAT 2.7 %BOOST, THE WEB TRAFFIC RESEARCH STUDY CONSISTS OF 6 % HISTORY TRAFFIC GROWTH. SO INHERENTLY, THE ENHANCEMENTS ADDRESS OUR WEBSITE TRAFFIC BUT OTHER GROWTH TOO. THE PERSONNEL REPORT VALIDATES THAT ALL CURRENT DEGREES OF SOLUTION WILL CERTAINLY BE MAINTAINED IN CRITICAL AREAS AND ALSO ALL JUNCTIONS WILL CERTAINLY BE OPERATING AT LEVEL SERVICE D OR BETTER AT BUILDOUT WHICH IN ITSELF IS GOOD, BUT I WOULD SUBMIT THAT THERE ARE OTHER IMPORTANT ADVANTAGES THAT AREN ' T NECESSARILY OBVIOUS IN DOING A STRAIGHTFORWARD BEFORE AS WELL AS AFTER CONTRAST OF SOLUTION. I WILL CERTAINLY TALK EVEN MORE CONCERNING THAT IN A MOMENT BELOW. NC 54 HALLWAY STUDY WAS CONDUCTED TO CONDUCT LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS. ONE OF THE MOST CRITICAL'OF THOSE ENHANCEMENTS IS THE EXCELLENT SEPARATION OF 54 WITH FERRINGTO ROADWAY. FERRINGTON ROADWAY WILL CERTAINLY DISCUSS NC 54. WHEN THAT IS DONE, THAT– THE TRANSFORMING MOTIONS AT THE EXISTING INTERSECTION WILL BE REDIRECTED THROUGH COLLECTION AGENCY STREETS TO THE NEARBY FALCON BRIDGE INTERSECTION WHERE AN INTERCHANGE WILL CERTAINLY BE CONSTRUCTED. THAT ALONG WITH COMPLETING THE SIX-LANE CROSS-SECTION ON NC 54, THOSE EXPENSES OVERALL CONCERNING $40 MILLION. BUT THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO FUND ABLE OF FOR THE ASPECTS OF THE HALLWAY RESEARCH. ONE POINT THE HALLWAY RESEARCH DOES NOT DO IS RECOMMEND INTERI ENHANCEMENTS AS WE ' RE SEEKING FINANCING FOR THE$40 MILLION-PLUS. THAT IS WHAT THIS JOB PROVIDES. THIS EXHIBIT SIMPLY RECEIVES ORANGE THE SUGGESTED ENHANCEMENTS THAT THE TASK HAS ACTUALLY DEDICATED TO.THE NEW LANE ANNUAGE IS IN ORAN. THIS IS FERRINGTON ROAD ON THE EXHIBITION. WITHIN FERRINGTON ROAD IS A CONCRETE AVERAGE, SHOWN IN RED.'THIS IS AN TOTAL VIEW. WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO DO IS SWIFTLY STROLL VIA THE PRIVATE RENOVATIONS. THIS FOCUSES IT ON THE NC 54 FERRINGTON ROAD INTERSECTION. I ALTERED– I EXCUSE ALTERING THE POSITIONING. NC 54 NOW RUNS EAST-WEST AS WELL AS THIS IS FERRINGTON ROADWAY BELOW. THE EASTBOUND APPROACH WE WILL BE EXTENDING THE PRESENT LEFT TURN LANE FROM 175 FEET OF STORAGE SPACE TO 300 FEET OF STORAGE. CURRENTLY TO DAY, THERE WERE THREE WITH LANES ON THE EASTBOUND 54. THE OUTSIDE OR SOUTHERNMOST LANE IS A SHARED THROUGH RIGHT TRANSFORM LANE. THE QUANTITY OF THE RIGHT TURNS, WHILE SMALL, TURNING ON TO FERRINGTON ROADWAY IS SIMPLY ENOUGH THAT PEOPLE TEND TO STAY CLEAR OF USING THAT TO GO THROUGH THE JUNCTION. THEY DON ' T WANT TO BE DECREASED BY THE RIGHT-TURNING AUTOMOBILES. BY CONSTRUCTING THE NEW RIGHT TURN LANE, YOU GET THE RIGHT TURN ABILITY, BUT WE ASSISTANCE REALIZE THE COMPLETE CAPABILITY OF TH WITH LANE. REALLY SIMILAR SCENARIO ON WESTBOUND I-40. THIS ONCE AGAIN IS FERRINGTON ROADWAY HERE. 54 AS WELL AS THIS IS THE TERMINUS OF THE EASTBOUND I-40 RAMP. BELOW, TOO, WE HAVE THREE THROUG LANES, OOPS. THREE THROUGH LANES, OF WHICH THE NORTHERN MANY ONE IS A SHARED THROUGH RIGHT TRANSFORM LANE. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IN THIS SCENARIO IS THAT THERE IS An EXTREMELY HEFTY VOLUME OF RIGHT TRANSFORMS COMING FROM 54 TURNING NORTHBOUND ON THE FERRINGTON ROADWAY. NO ONE REALLY WANTS TO GET I THAT VIA LANE SINCE THEY ARE GOING TO BE HELD UP BY RIGHT-TURNING AUTOMOBILES. ESSENTIALLY, WHAT YOU HAVE IS THE ABILITY OF TWO THROUGH LANES. HERE AGAIN, ADDING THE RIGHT TRANSFORM LANE GAINS YOU RIGHT-TURN ABILITY BUT IT PERMITS YOU TO UNDERSTAND MORE OF THE WITH MOVEMENT CAPACITY THAT IS ALREADY THERE. ANOTHER POINT THAT THIS DOES IS HELPS SHORTEN QUEUES BETWEEN THIS REALLY SHORT RANGE BETWEE THE FERRINGTON ROADWAY STOP BAR AN EXISTING RAMP TERMINUS OF I-40. QUICKLY SWITCH OVER TO FERRINGTON ROAD, WHICH RUNS NORTH-SOUTH. THIS IS 54. THIS IS CLEERA DRIVE. THE TASK SITE IS HERE. YOU TIN SEE THE EXISTING CHURCH STRUCTURE. CURRENTLY TODAY, DURING THE HEAVIEST COMPONENTS OF THE TOP HOUR, WEB TRAFFIC SUPPORTS ON FERRINGTON ROAD, SOMETIMES THROUGH CLEORA DRIVE. IT IS PRIMARILY A RESULT OF THE HEFTY SOUTHBOUND LEFT TRANSFORMS FROM FERRINGTON HOMES, 54 HEADED TOWARDS 40 AND COMPONENTS OF THE EAST WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING IS DUAL LEFT TURNS AND NATURALLY, RECONSTRUCTING THE THROUGH LANE AS WELL AS THE RIGHT TURN IN ENHANCEMENT TO THE WEST. YOU ADDITIONALLY DISCOVER WHAT I DISCUSS PRIOR TO IS THAT A MEAN WILL CERTAINLY BE CONSTRUCTED FROM 54 APPROXIMATELY CLEORA DRIVE AND THAT WILL CERTAINLY LIMIT THIS DRIVE AS WELL AS THIS DRIVE TO RIGHT TURN MOVEMENTS ONLY. THAT DECREASES RUBBING. MINIMIZES CONTRASTING MOTIONS IN IT THE AREA. WHEN I WAS OBSERVING THE INTERSECTION, I SAW ODD AS WELL AS HAZARDOUS GUY UFS OUT OF BELOW. I BELIEVE THIS WILL BE A CONSIDERABLE BENEFIT. SERVING THE TASK ITSELF WOUL BE A LEFT TURN LANE HEADED NORTHBOUND ON CLEORA. THIS LEFT TURN EXTENDED ALL THE MEANS TO 54. WE DON ' T REQUIRED THAT MUCH STORAGE SPACE BUT AS A SAFETY PREVENTATIVE MEASURE, WE ESSENTIALLY MADE THAT A LANE THAT COPULATES BACK TO KEEP WEB TRAFFIC FROM SPILLING BACK RIGHT INTO THE INTERSECTION. > > LET ' S RETURN TO THAT SLIDE. THE INDIVIDUALS COMING OUT OF CAROLINA CROSSING 1, TYPICALLY, IF THEY WANTED TO TRANSFORM LEFT, SINCE THE AVERAGE ISN ' T THEREIN THEY CAN COME LEFT, NOW TURN RIGHT, TURN LEFT TO COME BACK? > > YOU ARE ASKING A REALLY GOOD CONCERN. PART OF THE JOB INSTITUTES CROSS ACCESSIBILITIES EASEMENTS FROM THE FEATURES TO THE SOUTH VIA THE PROPOSED WEBSITE AS MUCH AS CLEORA DRIVE SO YOU DON ' T HAVE TO MAKE THOSE MOVEMENTS. > > I DISCUSS INDIVIDUALS UPCOMING OUT OF CAROLINA CROSSING ON THE STRUCTURE ON THE RIGHT. WHEN THEY CAME >> OUT, THEY WOULD MAKE A LEFT RESORT TO RETURN TOWARDS 54th NOW IT APPEARS LIKE THEY NEED TO MAKE A RIGHT TURN, MOST LIKELY TO CLEORA AND COME BACK. > > GO TO THIS MAP. THEY HAVE 2 DRIVEWAYS OVER THERE. THIS IS RESTRICTED TO
>> RIGHT TURN MOVEMENTS ONLY. THE ONE TO THE NORTH IS UP HERE THAT ALLOWS FULL-MOVEMENT ACCESS. EXCELLENT QUESTION, BECAUSE WHAT WE ' RE DOING IN THIS AREA, BECAUSE THERE WAS A LEFT TURN LANE DOWN HERE, WHICH WE ' RE ELIMINATING, WE ' RE MOVING THAT LEFT TURN LANE TO THIS DRIVE TO SERVE IT BETTER FOR THIS RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY YOU STATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF FERRINGTON ROADWAY. FURTHERMORE THROUGH THIS LOCATION, WE ' RE OFFERING 4-FOOT BIKE LANE THROUGH THE WIDENING, WHICH EXTENDS CONCERNING A THOUSAND PHOTO.ALSO RECOMMENDING TO ADD– THE ARROW GO? THE CROSSWALK AND PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS AT THE 54-FERRINGTON CROSSWAY. THOSE WILL GO THROUGH NCDOT AUTHORIZATION AND ALSO THE DESIGN WOULD B BASED ON THEIR AUTHORIZATION. > > SIR, COULD YOU INCLUDE A LITTLE MORE CONCERNING THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS AND SIGNALLING THERE? ARE THEY GON NA BE ON BOTH SIDES AND ALSO GO BOTH INSTRUCTIONS? HOW WILL THAT WORK? >
> I BELIEVE THAT IS A QUESTION FOR NCDOT. AMONG THE ISSUES I WOULD LATER ON YOU TO RIGHT NOW IS I WOULD SUGGEST NOT PLACING A CROSSWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF FERRINGTON ROADWAY THROUGHOUT 54. >> WHAT THAT DOES IS SHORTEN THIS STACKING DISTANCE. WHICH IS EXTREMELY CRITICAL. BETWEEN THE I-40 RAMP AND FERRINGTON ROAD. WE COULD PROVIDE CROSSWALKS ON THIS SIDE OF IT RIGHT HERE, AND ALSO ON >> WEST SIDE, AND ACROSS FERRINGTO ROAD.I DON ' T SEE ISSUES KEEPING THAT. DID THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? > > COULD YOU STAND? TELL ME WHO OWNS THE RIGHT OF WAY CONCERNING THE AREAS YOU ARE DISCUSSING MAKING? > > DIFFICULT TO SEE. THE EXISTING RIGHT OFWAY PER CITY OF DURHAM GIK EXTENDS WITH BELOW, UP THIS LINE AND ALSO ALL THE MEANS OFF THE PAGE ON THI SIDE. THE POINT BEING IT ' S An EXTREMELY WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
THAT ' S REGARDING THE CLOSEST PINCH FACTOR THAT WE HAVE RIGHT THERE. >> THERE IS ADEQUATE RIGHT OF WAY TO DO THE ENHANCEMENTS. > > AND THAT INDICATES YOU WEAR ' T NEED TO PURCHASE IT, IT IS ALREADY THERE? > > THAT ' S CORRECT. > > OK. > > THAT GOES FOR THE ENHANCEMENTS ALONG FERRINGTON AND ALSO THOSE ALONG 54. > > OK. COUNCILMAN MOFFAT? > > SORRY TO KEEP INTERRUPTING YOUR DISCUSSION. > > THAT ' S PENALTY. > > DO I COMPREHEND WHAT YOU CLAIMED WAS THAT THERE IS A PROFFER OF COMMITTED ELEMENT OF CROSSWALKS >> ON FERRINGTON AS WELL AS NC 54? > >'I WEAR ' T THINK THERE IS >> A CERTAIN PROFFER COMPOSED ON THE ADVANCEMENT PLAN. THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD APPEARANCE TO INCLUDE SUBJECT TO D.O.T.APPROVAL AS I STATED BEFORE, THERE ARE DETAILS TO >> BE FUNCTIONED OUT. AM I MENTIONING CORRECTLY? > > FOR MY POINT OF DETAILS, THERE IS> NOT CURRENTLY A PROFFE FOR PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS ON N 54 THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE ONE MADE TONIGHT BY THE APPLICANT AND ALSO WE WOULD HAVE TO ENSURE IT WAS ENFORCEABLE AS WELL AS LEGAL. > > THE CANDIDATE IS SHAKING HIS HEAD. > > HE ' S NODDING HIS DIRECT AND ALSO DOWN. > > TOPIC TO NCDOT AUTHORIZATION. > > THEY ' RE MAYOR. I THINK THERE IS CURRENTLY WALKWAY ON 3 OF THE >> CORNERS, BUT NOT NECESSARILY TH ENTIRE INTERSECTION. HOW WOULD YOU RECOMMEND TO LINK INTO THOSE TO CONNECT THE CROSSWALK IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING WALKWAY AND ALSO OR FILL I ANY SPACES? > > UM, I ' M TRYING TO CONSIDER TH MAP AND ALSO IDENTIFY WHICH OF THOSE SECTORS IS MISSING. I BELIEVE THERE MAY BE SOME PROBLEM FROM D.O.T. >> REGARDING EXPANDING SIDEWALK EASTWARD INT THE INTERCHANGE AREA
. THAT, AGAIN, IS SOMETHING WE NEED TO OVERCOME THE PROCEDURE. > > SO I THINK PERHAPS TO REACH A POINT THIS NIGHT, PERHAPS THERE COULD BE SOME CONVERSATION WITH RESIDENT TRANSPORTATION STAFF TO COME UP WITH SOMETHING THAT WOULD SERVE TO >> EVERYONE? REGARDING SUPPORTING FACILITIES AS WELL AS SIDEWALKS, THINGS LIKE THAT? > > CERTAINLY WE WOULD WANT TO INCLUDE PEDESTRIAN HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE RAMPS WHERE THEY ARE REFERRED TO. BUT LIKEWISE, WE DON ' T WANT TO LEAD PEOPLE TO WHERE SIDEWALKS WILL CERTAINLY END AS WELL AS NO BE USED IN THE FUTURE. I BELIEVE THAT IS YOUR PROBLEM. > > PARTICIPANTS OF COUNCIL, IF I MIGHT, CONSULTANT WITH TRANSPORT STAFF, IF THE APPLICANT MAKES IT CLEAR THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS WOULD BE CLEAR TO D.O.T.APPROVAL AS WELL AS REQUIREMENTS THAT WOULD ENCOMPASS THINGS LIKE APPROPRIATE DISCONTINUATION POINT, HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AS WELL AS OTHER LINKED PRODUCTS. > > THAT IS CERTAINLY WHAT WE ' RE PROPOSING, YES. AND ALSO PROFFERING. > > AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME, CANISTER YOU READ THAT LANGUAGE INTO THE DOCUMENT, FOR United States? > > I WOULD ASK THAT THE APPLICANT >> SPECIFY THE LOCATION OF THE AUTHORIZATIONS. I KNOW YOU SAID SOMETHING EARLIER. WE WISH TO ENSURE WE UNDERSTAND. > > I BELIEVE WE OUGHT TO STATE LIMITE GENERALLY TO THE JUNCTION O 54 FERRINGTON ROAD. IF WE REACH SPECIFIC PLACES I DON ' T WISH TO MISLEAD WHERE THEY COULD BE BUT IT WILL REMAIN IN CONFORMITY WITH D.O.T.POLICY. NOT TRYING TO PREVENT >>. I PUT ON ' T WISH TO OVERPROMISE AND ALSO UNDERDELIVER >>. > > CONSIDERING THAT WE HAVE THIS SCHEMATIC HERE, CAN YOU SPEAK TO WHERE THE TAKEOFF WOULD BE FOR THE FLYOVER ON FERRINGTON ROADWAY OVER? I RECOGNIZE THIS HAS BEEN PROPOSED. WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT >>? > > BEAR WITH ME ONE SECOND WHILE A FIND THE SLIDE THAT IS PERHAPS BETTER TO APPEARANCE AT THAT ON. THIS IS ONCE MORE, REORIENTED. NORTH IS'UP IN THIS LOCATION. THE BEGINNING POINT IN WHICH FERRINGTON ROADWAY WOULD LEAVE ITS EXISTING GRADE IS PROBABLY SOMEWHERE REGARDING 300-FOOT SOUTH OF THE JUNCTION. IT WOULD CONNECTION BACK INTO GRADE SOMEPLACE 300, 350 FEET NORTH O THE CROSSWAY. > > DO YOU HAVE ANY SUGGESTION HOW HIG THAT WOULD BE AT ANY TIME? > > MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT TO ACCOMPLISH COMMON CLEARANCE UNDER >> THE FRAMEWORK, THAT THERE HAS TO BE 16.5 FEET OF CLEARANCE ON THIS KIND OF ROUTE. THE ACME WOULD BE 60-PLUS FEET? IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? > > AS WELL AS FROM THAT POINT, YOU WOULD HAVE THE ABILITY TO ATTAIN WHAT I STANDARD, A 6% TO 7%QUALITY OFF OF THAT BRIDGE PULL BACK TO THE EXISTING GRADE. > > AS WELL AS THE ELEVATION OF THE CONSTRUCTING THAT YOU ' RE PROPOSING ON YOUR WEBSITE ARE WHAT? HOW HIGH >> ARE THE BUILDINGS? > > I ' M TOLD THAT THEY ' RE 7 STORY >>. > > I HEARD– I THOUGHT I SAW 7 STORIES. CANISTER I MULTIPLY 7 TIMES 8 TO GET THE TOTAL ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING? WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? I ' M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND– I RECOGNIZE WE CHATTED ABOUT THE$40 MILLION IN YEARS LATER ON PRIOR TO THIS OCCURS BUT I ' WANTING TO GET A SENSE AS TO HOW HIGH THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS THA YOU HAVE ON YOUR
>> WEBSITE ARE GOING TO APPEARANCE ABOUT THE OVERPASS'AT FERRINGTON ROAD. > > MY NAME IS PHIL CUP. FIRST CENTRIC ENGINEERING. I'ASK FORGIVENESS. THE BELLS SUGGESTED ARE SEVEN >> TALES. IF YOU ASSUME ROUGHLY 12 FEET PER STORY. 12 TO 13 FEET PER STORY. BY THE TIME THE STREET WOULD B GOING DOWN IN BEFORE OUR'BUILDING, IT ' S GON NA RESEMBLE A 6 AND A FIFTY PERCENT TO 7 STORY OVER THE ROADWAY. SINCE THE OVERPASS AS IT START TO FIND DOWN,' IT WILL CERTAINLY REALLY HAVE TO DO WITH HALFWAY DOWN THE 16-FOOT ELEVATION BY THE TIME IT ENTERS FRONT OF OUR BUILDING. > > IF YOU COULD POINT OUT ON TH MAP WHERE YOU ' RE STRUCTURE? >> > > THIS IS THE EXISTING CHURCH RIGHT RIGHT HERE. OUR STRUCTURE IS ACTUALLY PUT– THE FRONT BUILDING IS PLACED ABOUT BECAUSE POSITION RIGHT THERE. > > OK. > > DOES THAT AID RESPONSE THE QUESTION? > > YES, IT PROVIDES A MUCH BETTER VISUA IF IF I AM RESTING ON THE 6TH FLOOR, WHAT AM I LOOKING AT? I ' M LOOKING AT A FLYOVER THAT IS UPCOMING DOWN, ALMOST AT THE ENDPOINT ON THE GROUND. > > PRACTICALLY, YEAH. > > OK. > > A FEW VARIOUS OTHER EXTRA POINTS ARE NOTEWORTHY HERE. AS A CHOOSING TO DEVELOP> UNDER THE COMPACT AREA TIER REQUIREMENTS, THE CITY ' S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WILL CERTAINLY ENABLE DEGREE OF SOLUTION E AT FERRINGTON ROADWAY. OUR RENOVATIONS MAINTAIN LEVEL SOLUTION D, WHICH IS THE CITY ' S REGULAR STANDARD >>. >> NEXT THE WEBSITE WILL CERTAINLY LIKELY INTERCEPT TRAFFIC ALREADY ON TH NETWORK DESTINED FOR OTHER MEDICAL OFFICES WEST OF HERE. MINIMIZING THE INFLUENCE ON NC 54 WEST OF THE SITE. ALLOW ME TO BE CLEAR, THAT KIND OF TRIP RECORD WAS NOT ASSUMED IN THE WEB TRAFFIC
>> STUDY. >> IT WAS DONE THAT WAY TO BE TRADITIONALIST. > > ARE YOU TELLING ME THIS IS An ASSET? INDIVIDUALS THAT LIVE ON 54 THAT ARE GOING WEST WILL CURRENTLY SEE A GREAT DEAL OF WEB TRAFFIC DUE TO THE FACT THAT YOUR CUSTOMER WIL BE QUITING AT YOUR WEBSITE? > > CERTAINLY MEDICAL OFFICE UTILIZES, A GREAT DEAL OF THEM TO THE WEST AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS COMPLEX WOULD LIKELY INTERCEPT A LOT OF THAT WEB TRAFFIC PRIOR TO IF GOES FARTHER WEST DOWN NC 54. SO IT REDUCES THE VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVELING IS THE VERY BEST TERMINOLOGY I CAN THINK ABOUT. IT SHORT CIRCUITS THEIR TRIP. MAKES IT SHORTER. > > IF THEY WERE GOING TO A MEDICAL FACILITY, AS WELL AS I SAY, WELL YOU DON ' T HAVE TO CONCERN THE MEDICAL FACILITY >> CURRENTLY DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE ACTION YO BACK TO THE BUILDING, I CAN UNDERSTAND THAT.
> > DIFFICULT TO SEE. > > THAT ' S PENALTY. > > UM, I ' M TRYING TO APPEARANCE AT TH MAP AND NUMBER OUT WHICH OF THOSE SECTIONS IS MISSING. > > CERTAINLY WE WOULD NEED TO CONSIST OF PEDESTRIAN HANDICAP AVAILABLE RAMPS WHERE THEY ARE REFERRED TO. > > A FEW VARIOUS OTHER ADDED POINTS ARE NOTEWORTHY HERE.> > DOES THAT CONSIST OF FERRINGTON ROADWAY OR DID YOU EXAMINE THAT? > > OK. > > HI, I THINK I ' M THOUGHT ABOUT OPPOSED BUT I BELIEVE I ' M MORE CONCERNED THAN ANYTHING.BUT FIRST, AS An INDIVIDUAL THAT HASN ' T HAS A CIVICS LESSON IN 4 YEARS, I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO LISTEN TO HOW THOUGHTFULLY YOU TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION ALL THE ITEMS ON THE SCHEDULE TONIGHT.
> > THANK YOU. > > THANK YOU MAYOR. > > THANK YOU. > > ALL RIGHT, LET ' S GO TO MS. ROSEMARY KITCHENER. > > HI, I BELIEVE I ' M THOUGHT ABOUT OPPOSED BUT I BELIEVE I ' M MORE CONCERNED THAN ANYTHING.BUT FIRST, AS An INDIVIDUAL THAT HASN ' T HAS A CIVICS LESSON IN 4 YEARS, I APPRECIATE THE CHANCE TO HEAR HOW THOUGHTFULLY YOU TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION ALL THE PRODUCTS ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT.> > WE ' RE CERTAINLY PENALTY WITH THAT. > > I PUT ON ' T HAVE ONE THAT GOES DOWN TO FALCON BRIDGE, WHICH IS FARTHER TO THE WEST. > > IF I AM CLEAR CURRENTLY, THE CLIP RAMP IS ON WHAT I THINK IS TH SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE CROSSWAY AS WELL AS WOULD NOT BE AFFECTED BY EITHER ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IF THE APPLICANT I FUNCTIONING?
> > YOUR WELCOME. > > I WEAR ' T HAVE ONE THAT GOES DOWN TO FALCON BRIDGE, WHICH IS FARTHER TO THE WEST. > > IN THE DRAFT T.I.P., I WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF MARK OR WESLEY OR SOMEBODY IN TRANSPORT CANISTER CONFIRM THIS.I LOOKED THIS MORNING IN THE DRAFT 2014 T.I.P., THERE IS$1.6 MILLION ALLOCATED TO THE SLIP RAMP FROM FERRINGTON ROAD TO I-40, YES. > > THERE IS ANOTHER PERSON REASON WHY GUESS WE WOULD AGREE THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING WOULD LIKEL REQUIREMENT TO BE ON THE WEST SIDE BECAUSE OF THE SLIP RAMP TASK. > > SIMPLY A COUPLE OF COMMENTS.