– [Carlos] The chair, I believe that we'' re all collection and all set to go below.- Okay, all set to roll, fine. Great morning. It is April 13th, 2021, 9:00 am and invite to the Santa Cruz Area Board of Supervisors regular conference. Staff, would certainly you please call the roll? – Yes, as the roll, I'' d like to welcome every person to the Santa Cruz Region Board of Supervisors meeting for April 13th, 2021.
Proceed to the stipulations of the guvs exec order N-29-20. This conference'' s to be held essentially. The county welcomes the public to take part in today'' s meeting utilizing the Zoom web link provided on our site at santacruzcountyca.iqm2.com. Click on today'' s date and then on the agenda to access the Zoom web link, or you may kind it in as you see it on your screen. If you want to participate by phone, you may do so by calling +1 669-900-6833. The conference ID is 4078327816. Once again, you might call +1 669-900-6833 and go into the meeting ID. , if you require additional help logging into today'' s conference, please call the clerk of the boards office at (831) 454-2323 and you'' ll be helped in visiting. And now for the roll phone call. Manager Koenig. Close friend, Coonerty, Caput, McPherson.Thank you chair, you have a quorum. – Subscribe and after that the pledge of loyalty, I wish to state the passing away of a fantastic, impressive person in the San Lorenzo Valley, Ed Hillside of Ben Lomond, that died lately. His services were last weekend. He was a great impressive person, got a peaceful in his nature, yet actually an extremely caring and remarkable leader for the San Lorenzo Valley. So I'' d like us to simply, keep in mind Ed Hillside and his family members at this time. Is there anyone else that want to make a special comment? Okay, we'' ll have a minute of silence. Okay, we will certainly understand perform the promise of obligation. “” I pledge obligation to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all”.” We will certainly go to thing number 3, consideration of late enhancements to the program and removals to the If essential, consent and normal agendas. Comments from the board. – We carry the modification seat.
– Oh, excuse me Mister Palacios, yes. – Yes, we carry the normal agenda product number 9, extra materials, attachment F, public reporter. And afterwards we have a schedule on the consent agenda item 82.1. This is to authorize the visit of Peter Radin as the 4th district appointee to the Redistricting Advisory Payment as recommended by Supervisor Caput. There'' s a board memorandum and there'' s Peter Radin ' s application. That ends the alteration Chairman McPherson. – Thanks. Any kind of statements by board members of products to be removed from the authorization or routine program? I presume we'' d beginning with Mister Koenig, Manager Koenig. – None, thanks, chair. – You put on'' t have any, is that right? -Nothing, no.- No remarks? (overlapping chatter) – Chair with this is just to get rid of products and afterwards we will have talk about item number 6.
– Okay, it'' s been 2 weeks too long. Okay. Any news board members of things to be gotten rid of from the authorization or routine agendas? Absolve me? Okay, we will now relocate to the product number five, the public remark duration. Anyone might attend to the board during the public remark period, not surpassing two mins. Comments must be routed to things on today'' s consent or closed session programs, yet to be heard products on the regular program or on a subject, not on today'' s agenda, however within the jurisdiction of the board of supervisors. We'' ll take public remarks now for up to half an hour, if required, extra time for public comments will certainly be allowed after the last item of today'' s normal agenda.The clerk, do
we have any kind of public remarks? – Yes, we have two members of the general public remark. Sorry, they are elevating their hands currently, there are numerous members of the public that would such as to address the board. If you wish to comment and are joining us through the Zoom link, please discover the hand symbol at the bottom of your display and click this icon to raise your hand.You '
ll be placed in a queue to talk. You'' re hiring from your phone, please dial * 9 now. Now this will certainly increase your hand and area you in the line. You'' ll be identified by your name or the last 4 digits of your phone number. Please dial * 6 to unmute on your own if you'' re on the phone, you ' ll be un-muted on the computer. When your time is up, your mic will certainly be automatically muted after 2 mins, please approve the satisfy and begin talking. This is speaker Joe Cafaro. – [Joe] Hi, greetings. This is Joe Cafaro from the Health Center Council of Northern and Central California. We'' re an advocacy group that stands for all the healthcare facilities and we were wishing to have table item 51, which is the appointment of a hospital representative to the CCAH Board.The existing person that is being asked to stand for hospitals is not a. health center representative. And we ' re simply intending to. have a bit more conversation. Not that we don ' t think. it ' s an excellent rep, It ' s simply, we wished to have.
a bit extra discussion to speak about real.
hospital representation. Thank you very much. – [Bruce] Thanks. – [Cabrera] Caller 8045. Your microphone has actually been un-muted. – [Linda] Well, good early morning. This is Linda Blair. And thanks for taking my telephone call today. A couple things I intended to raise. One is why is public.
just obtaining 2 mins? Definitely something that has actually occurred and has not been resolved, some online range from 3 minutes and before it'' s been to two mins. The public is actually being not permitted enough time to speak about.
things of compound. At the same time, the permission agenda.
There'' s a whole lot of stuff. I just lately satisfied a young.
local business owner in one more area of The golden state who described to me that, because of his interactions with.
the managers in his region, he finished up being pressed.
out of the rental home that he was living in. And most of us recognize just how hard it is.You really obtain kicked out from.
a rental home during these times of COVID. I am just listening to one.
side of the story, of program, yet the concept that that could.
even perhaps have any type of influence whatsoever on somebody'' s home, even if they ' re. doubting what the activities of the supervisors are, is actually terrifying. And I definitely hope that.
our board of supervisors in our town would certainly never take.
these kinds of activities, no issue just how much they.
Thank you all really much. And I'' m gon na continue. Thank you, I assume.
it'' s worth pointing out that, we as the board of managers.
here in Santa Cruz has taken actions to shield tenants.
Thank you for your remarks. – Thank you, calling individual one, your microphone is un-muted. Oh, alright.
repercussions are recorded and the region is rushing to.
placed 5G modern technology almost everywhere. Medical professional Thomas Cowan explains a few of what is poisoning us. We'' re listening to a lot about the sick people, but there are some unwell people.
Currently how do they get hypoxic? Viruses wear'' t make you hypoxic, but we do recognize from clear.
scientific research, returning to the seventies, the Naval Intelligence.
Research Institute did this. The Soviets did these. There were recent documents on it, that if you subject some.
place to millimeter wave, otherwise called 5G, three things will certainly take place. One, you'' ll weaken the.
oxygen and the environment. You'' re essentially like.
this emergency room medical professional said, “” It'' s like these individuals are. walking up the Mountain ranges!”” I think his name was Kyle Sydell.He said they are
in a. reduced oxygen setting. Like yeah, they ' re in. New York city'or Wuhan or on a cruise ship that had actually simply had 5G mounted. He requires even more examination and refers to Physician Christine Northrup. And I am excerpting from the records of “” Vaccines Disclosed.”” – [Cabrera] Thank you, caller 2915, your microphone is un-muted. – [Becky] Hello, can you hear me? This is Becky Steinbruner? – [Bruce] Yes. – [Becky] Hello, excellent early morning. Once more, this is Becky Steinbruner. I would love to claim, to talk with the consent schedule products. Number 25, prolonging.
the CZU local emergency situation. There is still no cash for.
those that have actually shed their homes in the fire to be able to have a housing.Even at the county fairgrounds, this violates the areas MOU. with the area fairgrounds, also under a state of neighborhood emergency, there is no housing being. offered these individuals.
They ' re still paying$ 950 a month to stay in the fairgrounds camping sites. It ' s dreadful that we can. It does not make feeling, that area fire is.
buying two kind one “Road Queens” they ' re. required the backwoods of
Davenport and Corralitos. “I have composed your board and'have actually not gotten any type of. details back from you. And I ' d like you to check out that. Number 32, I ' m really sorry to see historical resources commissioner,. Susie Miriam be replaced. She was amazing. And was the only commissioner.
That wraps up the speakers for public commenture. We will now go to activity. Are there any type of comments from.
board members on approval
items? This is number six. Manager Koenig.
I just wan na place out, I ' m. delighted to see item 28, the one-stop allowing. I mean, it ' s vital that we assist people get permits much better, quicker, less costly, and I assume this is a terrific. For things 29 through 49, I just wan na extend my
greatWonderful
It will certainly protect against mobile home. park owners from billing a surcharge on water to locals, and essentially generating income.
And thing 72, I simply wanted to factor.
– Thanks. Manager Good friend, any type of remarks?- Yeah, thank you, Mister Chair, I ' d additionally like to resemble in concerns. to the one-stop permitting something the board has. absolutely placed as a priority. And I actually value staff ' s. service this and eagerly anticipating what the end outcome.
When we ' re done with that, of this really will be.
And I would certainly such as to welcome. Michael Watkins in addition to the rest of each of the districts, appointees to the. Redistricting Compensation.
They ' ll have quite a work this year, specifically with the late data coming in, however
we value everybody ' s. readiness to volunteer and it appears like a great collection. of individuals to hold a really clear
and excellent process. on that particular moving forward.So welcome Michael Watkins and others.
Thanks, Mister Chair.- Supervisor Coonerty.
– Thank you, Mister Chair, simply 2 fast products. Is product number 52, which is urging the board to sustain HR1. We ' re seeing an extraordinary.
In item 53, it appears every year we.
And so I hope you all join me in sending a letter to the PUC,&prompting them not to or. modification PG&E ' s proposal to truly minimize the stability. of rooftop solar in our neighborhood and throughout The golden state. -Thank you.
Manager Caput'. -Thanks. Just item number 65.
I ' d like to welcome Philippe. Hernandez that ' s the ultimate to the Santa Cruz Area Regional. I have a number of comments I
' d. like to make on the one-stop permit authorization
facility 28.
preparation and ecological departments particularly, but it ' s going to be a social shift too.So I really hope that the region staff members, and I believe they ' re delighted to do this. I think the area will certainly improve. its service to residents once this is in place, and we ' ve been working. with this for a very long time. We have a fantastic model now,'with 4 leaf currently handling the CZU fire restoring allows. On item 52, which was discussed for HR1, I ' m mosting likely to be electing
versus that. Because I put on ' t like, it ' s not. the basic thoughts of it, yet I ' m concerned the means the. Congress is addressing some of these concerns and it ' s all. encompassing it seems. They did this with the, and I ' m appreciative of what. we have actually gotten for circumstances, in the previous COVID Bill, yet actually regarding the. understanding is'concerning 20% or much less of it truly. mosted likely to healthcare straight, but'we required that cash, I get
it, yet it was far more costly than that.Then we had the Infrastructure Bill, which everybody considers. framework as bridges and roadways and airports etc. But this has a lot more to it than that. It ' s only about 30 %in framework. And on this with HR1
, I do wish to absolutely, as. a former secretary of state, desire everybody to have their. ability to elect as openly and clearly as possible, however this includes you recognize, it might place DC as a state, could permit tally harvesting.There ' s just far more to it that needs to be addressed separately. Which ' s why I ' m simply worried about the. method we ' re approaching this, and as Congress is coming close to. this, I need to say. Therefore that ' s why I ' ll.
be electing no on that particular. And I do appreciate the concerns. I believe it was significant exactly how. a lot of the voter result was absolutely below in Santa Cruz.
County'and that snow get on our staff ' s department due to the fact that. And for item 53, that was pointed out by Supervisor Coonerty, I wan na thank him for.
a clear message to Sacramento and the PUC, and to invest their own
. energies that Santa Cruz Area supports the existing net. power metering policy. It additionally sends out a clear message. to the neighborhood solar industry that we
sustain their business model.As you understand, I ' m much connected with the Central Coastline Community Power Firm, and we ' ll be talking about the. web power metering policy as it concerns the CCCE rates over in the coming months. And I do welcome the. area to take part in that discussion as I ' m the chair of the Central Shore Neighborhood. Energy Policy Board. Thing 76, the pet shelter restorations. I wan na give thanks to and acknowledge and give thanks to the pet shelter personnel for their remarkable help the CZU Fire. They arrange a terrific feedback. throughout that very uncomfortable time for evacuated and threatened animals. And I'' m glad we can make these.
renovations to the shelter in order to boost those. kinds of services also much more. And I additionally wan na keep in mind the. architect for the project is Teall Messer. He was the engineer for the lovely brand-new Felton Branch Library. And I believe we ' re once more, fortunate to have his involvement. in this area job.
It ' s truly something much. needed and individuals really appreciate their pets as we recognize. Thing 77, the Hopkins Gulch, the locals of Hopkins Gulch ought to come from region service area 51. They waited for numerous. years to get this FEMA money.And I wan na thank public. jobs and the CSA 51 members for collaborating to make this'occur. The very same chooses product number 80 on the Jamison Creek storm repair services. These significant tornado damages. that happen to our roadways take several years to get. the proper funding, to make these points take place. And this job stands for
. an additional chance to highlight that storm repair services remain to.
This is nearly a$ 2.7 million. I wan na keep in mind the commitment of our public works department personnel and make these improvements. -Relocate approval, Coonerty.
– Mister Chair, simply a factor of order.- Okay, then I ' ll secondly. Supervisor Coonerty ' s motion.
– Obtained it. Steph, call the roll please.
to approve the authorization schedule.
– Okay, to authorize the authorization. schedule with the no ballot from McPherson on thing number 52. Manager Koenig.- Aye.- [Cabrera] Good friend.- Aye. – Coonerty.- [
Coonerty'] Aye.- Caput. -Aye.
– [Cabrera] McPherson. -[
– Thank you.- Thank you, the motion is accepted. We will now go to the routine.
vision, goal, values, details sheet.
And I think our health. services firm director Mimi Hall will presented this to us.- Thanks Chairman McPherson. Yes, I ' m actually,” actually delighted to be here to assist our personnel recognize everyone that functions with us
as. well as the whole area in regard of National. Public Health Week, which was last week from.
April 5th via 11. And was different than any kind of. I have actually been saying for.
Comparable to water, power and roads, it ' s extremely crucial to. Today I ' m happy to.
introduce our principal of public health and wellness, Jen Herrera, and our public health and wellness. manager, Emily Chung, that additionally wear added hats. of leadership roles in the COVID-19 public health emergency situation reaction.
And I also wan na thank all of. our public health team from our epidemiologists,
public health nurses, our research laboratory employees,. wellness instructors and more, that are necessary to the. health of our community. At the end of the day, all public health and wellness is local. and every neighborhood ' s wellness depends on the frequently undetectable work of its regional wellness department. And I wan na additionally acknowledge that our job can not be done alone.It requires the whole. system of federal government, health system partners, in addition to neighborhood members. And so today I wan na acknowledge. everybody that has actually joined us over the in 2015, in party of National. Public Health Week.'And I ' ll turn it over to Jen, thank you.- Thanks, Director Hall, thanks Chair McPherson. and members of the board. And I am Jen Herrera, principal of public wellness for. Santa Cruz County Public Wellness. And I ' m joined by my. associate, Emily Chung, that is the general public health. manager for our department.
And we are below to. proceed the event of National Public Wellness Week. It ' s a yearly event that. occurs during the initial week of April. So it occurred April 5th with 11th, and this year ' s style was, “Building bridges to much better health.” What you ' ll see in our slide. deck is that at the end of each of the sides includes. our public health division vision, objective, and worths, given that they ' re fundamental. to every little thing that we do.So for National'Public Health Week, it ' s a time to commemorate, reflect, and supporter for the. conditions which affect the population ' s health and wellness. This “year ' s day-to-day motifs.” are all about restoring, building durability and attending to source of injustices that have the downstream. impact of health and wellness and wellness on populations. These styles include.
advancing racial equity, reinforcing area, galvanizing environment justice'.
There'' s a board memo and there'' s Peter Radin ' s application. And I'' m gon na continue. They ' ll have fairly a work this year, particularly with the late data coming in, however
we appreciate everybody Everyone s. willingness readiness volunteer and it looks like a great fantastic. It ' s not due to the fact that I don ' t like. And that ' s why I ' m simply worried concerning the.Wellness occurs in parks. As a division, we promote, protect, and improve the wellness.
Various other services do this in the region. By this blue hub-and-spoke on the.
So as a program, public health and wellness, the general public health department is among four divisions under the health services company. The various other departments consist of centers, behavioral health, and
In this instance, the county. And as a pointer, this is how we'' re.
through state and government codes.But to deal with these complicated issues like racism and environment modification or the pandemic, it requires the public health and wellness strategy, which we can transform to the 10. necessary public wellness solutions as a referral. This is a vivid wheel that provides a framework for public health and wellness to secure and advertise. the health of all individuals in all areas. At the core of our vital. solutions is equity.It ' s the principle that everybody.
should have a fair and just
opportunity to achieve. ideal wellness and wellness.
You can see on the. external side of the wheel, it ' s these 10 solutions can be split into three buckets, evaluation, plan. advancement, and assurance. It adheres to the clinical technique. What we do is based in proof, it ' s based upon data, we'produce recommendations and. we produce systems to keep an eye on the wellness and assure. standing of the area. We do this with COVID-19 and we ' ve done this with. the CZU fire response.
Every action that was taken. there was information or
intel to sustain those activities. And after that there were follow-up. actions to guarantee the wellness and
safety of the neighborhood. We additionally do this with housing for health. Human solutions division. is returning in August to supply even more referrals. on their assessment of the health condition in the area, we will offer plan. referrals and establish guarantees for the health and wellness and. wellness of the community.In terms of Santa Cruz. Region ' s health and wellness status
, Santa Cruz Area'is recognized for being a healthy and balanced location to live. Area health and wellness positions reveal. that Santa Cruz is rated among
among the healthiest. regions in The golden state in the leading quartile. And there ' s an additional dataset called the California Healthy and balanced Places Index, that notes that many. of the census tracks in our area has much healthier.
area conditions. Implying we have greater revenue, access to food and education attainment, the transport access.However, healthy and balanced locations. index additionally notes that there are neighborhoods that have barriers to health and wellness.
These barriers that impact. health and wellness include hardship, minimal transportation,. inaccessible housing, and also accessibility to ballot. These are called social.
determinants of health. The chart on the right reveals, an instance of how we make use of data.
to promote wellness equity. And this specifies for. the COVID-19 response.
What we located is that. And so what we ' ve been doing. And so what we ' re trying to.
do is ensure that the space between heaven line and. that black line are
reduced, which we ' ve seen over time, is that we ' ve done a lot. of collaborate with the community of South Region, which is the location most.
And I simply wan na provide. My name is Emily Chung, I am the public health and wellness supervisor for our public health and wellness division. And I desired to share that.
Public health and wellness is much a lot more. than just emergency situation reaction. And right here on this slide you. can see a few highlights of
programs that we are very. proud of in our community, such
as sustaining population level and avoidance focus activities that are concentrated on upstream interventions.We truly value our area collaborations and cooperations. Examples of these collaborations. and cooperations include our ACEs mindful program, which is a brand-new give to avoid. adverse childhood occasions.
And one more instance would be the With each other We Care, treatment. coordination system, which
is being placed. together by our Santa Cruz Community Health And Wellness Info Company, to assist us enhance treatment. control and data sharing. We have much more instances such as our non-active transportation activities.Our Friday Evening Live.
Act on medication, alcohol, and tobacco avoidance activities. We couldn ' t highlight them all today, yet I wan na make certain that. Our robust programs actually.
Following slide. And in order to actually strive. in the direction of moving on to an extra populace health focus. and a lot more facilities tasks like we have. begun with ACEs Aware and with the Together We Treatment Platform, we will certainly need to rebuild public health.Public wellness has perpetually. been underfunded and also defunded over the years.
And it was just shown much more. brightly on the issue of the defunding and underfunding. during the pandemic response. Currently even more than ever before, there the demand for
. financial investments in public health and wellness facilities in order to. boost us in readiness for the following emergencies, the next pandemic, and generally, improving our neighborhood ' s. ability to have far better wellness every day for everybody as our. department ' s vision requires.
While we have actually been actually.
In order to truly rebuild public health, we will require to focus on, science, justice, wellness, and action.
For science, we need to elevate the value of public health and wellness.
The role that public wellness.
health that is extra comprehensive, data-driven utilizing progressed
. analytics and technologies, and constructed on our. enhancing partnerships in our neighborhood.
For action, we ' ll demand. to take a look at our labor force.
Our labor force has been examined. and tired this previous year, and they have a vital.
We ' ll demand to spend further. For health, we can better.
improve our health results and minimize health and wellness investing. and save even more lives when we concentrate on health, when we enable public. wellness to play that role, to focus on the prevention and.
messaging and treatments that will really sustain our.
Our various other statewide coalitions are starting to work.
We thank you for that. It has been truly. And that is a large part of.
doing to ensure injection equity and services for our. most disadvantaged areas. And we can proceed to do more. We wan na highlight our, in closing, I wan na highlight our vision, objective and values, which drive all of the job. we perform in public wellness.
Every one of our staff. Our vision needs to much better. Our mission to collaborate.
and wellbeing of all.And our values, which are the core factors.
why we do our job, which are to be area. focused, to collaborate, have compassion, usage equity, have top quality of solutions
. and lionize for every person.
We thank you once again to the.
Board for your recurring assistance of public health, due to the fact that our successes are successes that will help our community and you all come to be a lot more
successful.- Mister Chair, I think we ' ve concluded.- I wan na thank you.
I ' ll go to the board members. Go to the public, starting with Supervisor Buddy.- Thank you, Mister Chair.
I think that we ' ve all
, you ' ve heard listened to lot of appreciation admiration us over the last year, but However mean, it really truly the needDemand As I ' ve claimed to Miss. Hall at repeated times, that she ' s been charitable enough.
to participate in city center that I ' ve done.You know there are people that are to life in our county due to. your job and your early job and your ongoing work. And they won ' t recognize that, undoubtedly individuals don ' t. understand the counterfactual', what would certainly have taken place. But I assume we can all be if we would have done something various.
recognized that you ' ve made a considerable payment in. the lives'of this neighborhood, with the job that you ' ve selected to do and the leadership that you took early, and commonly throughout this pandemic. So people are seeing each other and households are reuniting as an outcome of the job that was done by this area public health division here.So I simply wan na provide a. great deal of credit rating for you'that you should have, so thanks.- Thanks, Manager Pal. Manager Coonerty.- Yeah, I just wan na. take a minute and give thanks to the entire team at public wellness. It ' s been an insane 14 months, and I understand you all have been. taking care of numerous dilemmas and we ' re truly happy. When, one of the huge shocks. I got chosen to this board seven years back was, exactly how intriguing and impactful. public wellness can be. And the significance of the financial investments, as you all pointed out,
it ' s truly the opportunity for. government to act in type of a business method to determine, just how to alter behaviors. and or effect lives. And it ' s likewise among the few. locations where we can really participate in preventative. work, aiding people, prior to we ' re in the action mode, which is typically after people ' s. lives have actually been affected at high prices and truly difficult. for everyone entailed this opportunity, particularly with youngsters to get.
included in their life early and offer them the sources they need and reduce the obstacles, it ' s extremely important.And I wan na thanks for. making all of us knowledgeable about the several
aspects of public health and the means it can impact areas.
– Thanks. Manager Caput. You ' re muted, there you go. -Yeah, I wan na give thanks to the. health services agency for actioning in
throughout this.
really attempting time in our lives and getting up and moving and. obtaining points achieved at breakneck speed. I ' m extremely satisfied by all the jobs that your company has done.
And I wan na thank you essentially, that ' s what I wan na say. -Thank you chair.
Yeah, I just likewise wan na add my. deep appreciation for all'the work that you ' ve done this year. and which obviously always, I believe that the superb. quality of your work really receives our superb health. equity metrics in this region, in our high inoculation rates.And you guys are plainly. doing a superb work. And I look forward to collaborating with you to determine new financial investments, to enhance public wellness going ahead.- Thanks. I ' d like to duplicate much.
of what ' s been said about, thank you for dealing with.
extraordinary difficulties we
' ve had in the last 14. months to see our counties in the leading quartile The golden state, I assume talks for itself.And this all reminds us. of just how vital'it is to (indistinct)
public wellness. much more broadly I think. We need to understand that the. many challenges that we work with in the county inevitably have. a bearing on accomplishing good public health end results. These include, it '
s just.
not in the medical professional ' s space, it ' s a being homeless, material. abuse, psychological health and wellness, cost effective housing, public. safety and security, et cetera. And I wan na thank you for.
your presentation based on science and proof that. we remain to function on these subjects and we aim to support the wellness services department throughout.
They ' ve done a phenomenal task facing an unprecedented obstacle, as I mentioned.
Thank you to the public health. And she went over in this paper, which is entitled “Wellness threats associated. “There is nevertheless,” a dispute pertaining to the health.
non-thermal impacts of RF, that ' s superhigh frequency, FCC standards are irrelevant.” and can not be utilized for any insurance claims of safety unless. warm damage is involved.
Which ' s from key examining a research by.
– [Cabrera] Carol, your.
microphone is un-muted.- [Carol] Excellent early morning. I would like to reveal my interest in, when we have governmental.
agencies similar to this, it eliminates flexibility.
So we don ' t have the ability to make our own health care choices, which would remain in our very own. When we have governmental entities making those decisions for us.This past year has actually been, personal best rate of interest. a great instance of that. We wear ' t have wellness liberty
. to decide that are best for us. And a few of'us have actually taken. the moment to do research, to learn things that public health doesn ' t have accessibility to. Marilyn. Garrett recently referenced in her public comment.
earlier today, Physician Thomas Cowan. So Medical Professional Thomas Cowan and.
both Medical Professional Andrew Kaufman have actually chatted extensively about exactly how the COVID-19 infection has not been separated. Because it hasn ' t been isolated,. causation can not be'proved. So every one of these health and wellness orders. that have been issued by our public wellness are result of a. concept that the COVID-19 virus causes the disease. That ' s not real. I would love to recommend. that Mimi, Jen and Emily, please get Doctor Cowan ' s book. It ' s called the “Contamination Misconception.” And please read that.
Please inform yourself and. everyone who can hear me, please listen.Doctor Cowan does some amazing talks. You can locate them on BitChute.
He speaks about exactly how the COVID-19. virus has actually not been isolated. I'would certainly such as to extremely.
It ' s great to educate everybody,. At the end of the day, it ' s my personal decision. It ' s my health, my option, my body.
– [Cabrera]. Raymon Cancino,.
Excellent morning,.
board of managers. This is Ray Cancino from.
Community Bridges ' CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. I just intended to take some. time'of gratitude for the general public health and wellness job that has actually taken place over the last 14 months. I simply wan na applaud the group. that you have more than there. The diligent team has done.
I just wanted to just highlight. Mimi ' s discussion is that, none of this can have taken place without the federal and state support.
that was available in to public health and wellness. And the fact is, is that you have a possibility. to assume regarding and observe and make choices concerning just how. your future spending plan will certainly be reflective to continue these.
worths into the the next years. And I understand that ' s a. tough discussion. It ' s one that in some cases. feels like an absolutely no sum game, yet it ' s an actually vital. required conversation to be had if we actually value public security, public welfare, and public health in a different
manner.So I just advise you to start. Due to the fact that it is gon na be a lengthy road to obtain there, believing about that. Thank you for your time.
– [Bruce] Thank you. Calling individual one, your microphone is un-muted. Calling customer one, your microphone has actually been un-muted.
I likewise estimated him and we need to look at independent scientific research. Now here ' s a quote from international injection.
developer, Geert Vanden Bossche. He ' s from Belgium and he ' s talked to by Physician Phillip McMillan. And I saw the interview. on the HighWire.com, and the topic was towards. an injection calamity.
Component of what he stated, “These injections put on ' t protect against infections.
We additionally do this with real estate for health and wellness. My name is Emily Chung, I am the public health supervisor for our public health division. Board for your recurring support of public health, because our successes are successes that will certainly assist our area and you all end up being extra
successful. We put on ' t have health freedom
. It ' s my health and wellness, my option, my body.These vaccines out-compete
our all-natural antibodies or nonspecific antibodies.
These are long lived
vaccine caused antibodies. Generally everyone obtaining
a vaccine, the COVID shot, is having their innate
immune system damaged.”” This is extremely, really severe issue. A high incline and severe
ailment is inevitable and he'' s asking for a halt to this mess, what they'' re called vaccinations. To ensure that'' s Geert Vanden Bossche. Another resource of reality
regarding what'' s going on, is childrenshealthdefense.org, childrenshealthdefense.org. That'' s Robert F. Kennedy. – [Cabrera] Thank you. Customer 2915, your microphone
Hello there, thank you. This is Becky Steinbruner. I sustain whatever that the
previous audio speakers have claimed, especially concerning the
hypoxic conditions being produced by masks and the continuance
of seemingly comprised details to fit the requirements at the time. I would certainly likewise like to support
the worries regarding 5G being rolled out in this area and
connect that to the existing amendments of the region'' s. wireless statute, that councils as way to is putting forth. Representatives in New York City.
State have simply introduced an expense needing that there.
be environmental and wellness researches of the dangers of 5G technologies.New York State is not the
only one, New Hampshire additionally performed. these researches in 2020 and launched site information revealing the capacity. health threats and the need to improve surveillance of. wireless radiation exhausts originating from existing and. future wireless systems. This is an attack on several. people ' s body immune systems,
their sensitivities. The American Special needs. Act covers and recognizes electro-magnetic level of sensitivity that exists in members of our populace. I urge you and all health. agents to pay attention to this. Your board authorized a. letter of support in 2018 house siding with Anna Eshoo, that 5G should not be rolled. out unless there were additional studies
revealing that. maybe securely done to participants of the populace. I believe the huge thing was. that she desired and you desired regional control of exactly how much.
Thank you,.
– Thank you.( indistinct) Yes sir, Mister Coonerty,. Manager Coonerty.- Sorry, Mister Chair, I simply wan na in honor. of Public Health And Wellness Week, I think we owe an obligation to. mention that these type of whack work conspiracy theory
theories. that are discovered at night edges of the web about. COVID and injections are completely irresponsible to be making in public.And that we ' ve had practically 3. million individuals die worldwide.
We ' ve had more than a
fifty percent. a million Americans pass away. We'' ve had numerous people who.
got ill and are still ill and still really feeling the signs and symptoms.
Which if one point we can. do for public wellness awareness week or month is to really.
And don ' t spread outright fallacies and claim like you are involved.
– Thank you, Mister Coonerty, you'made your factor. Manager Friend, do. you have a comment, no?
Anyone else have a. comment from the board? I assume
our action is. simply to approve the report.
And again, I wan na thank Jennifer. Herrera and Emily Chung and under wellness solutions. director, Mimi Hall, for that outstanding.
discussion and wherefore you ' ve
done to make Santa. Cruz Region a safer place for all of us.
Thank you really much. -Sir, there ' s really.
we ' re simply to accept it. Well, okay.
We'' ll transfer to product number eight, a public hearing to think about. the recommendation of the preparation compensation to. accept application 181068, associating to open areas, however affecting assessors parcel, 063071-24 home situated on the Redwood Meadows, cattle ranch class lot-2. It ' s simply one great deal in Bonny
. Doon to turn that the job is excluded from more ecological evaluation under CEQUA, and you take relevant. activities as detailed in the memorandum of the preparation
director. Yet after that we have various other products. that are essentially A with Z that are noted in the agenda.
And I will certainly not state. each and every one of them, yet we have products A with.
Z so that if we can have a discussion on this, it would certainly be much valued, thank you. I think Annette Olson and Suzanne Ise are going to provide this,. Thank you, Manager McPherson, I ' m I ' m Jerry Bush with Annette Olson and Suzanne Ise.
my screen simply validating. -[ Bruce] Yes, it ' s. quite clear, thanks. -[ Jerry] So this is the Redwood. Meadows cattle ranch subdivision, which consists of 12.
household parcels and an agricultural great deal protected. by an open room easement.And this community and planned.
device growth regulation was approved by the board. of supervisors in 1983.
Here ' s a better look at. And you can see the. In 1993, the board of supervisors approved a whole lot line modification, including locations to 5 of the.
prospective agricultural uses and buildings on the Ag parcel.
And so the open space easement. The job likewise requires. And this is the area to be.
Abandoning that location would certainly
. Right here ' s the North area of the parcel. And you can see along.
trees that already acts as a buffer between possibility. agricultural usages on the Ag parcel,( Jerry removes throat) excuse me, and the subject development.
or suggested growth area.This location has only top quality.
dirts and a high water table, high base rock, thin dirts, inadequate drain.
It was evaluated by the open.
space programs committee, that included an agent of the Ag commissioner ' s office. Which board elected.
4-0 to suggest authorization of the proposed task. Below ' s a slope map. And so the proposed project.
water drainage structures away from the steeper slopes, which is extremely important in. these North coastline watersheds.The proprietor, Kyle Andeer and Architect Fuse revamped the task. to make it extra portable, to lessen grading and to.
Below ' s a view of the capacity, well, this is a sight from Brisa Del Mar looking down throughout the Ag parcel towards the growth. The proposed house would certainly be concealed, not only by the windbreak, but nearly completely hidden.
by the topography of the website and would certainly have no influence on. open room worths from either Brisa Del Mar or from Bonny Doon Road. The recommended framework. follow LCP plans concerning frameworks in the, in potential view and with the policies that would. impact or govern farming frameworks within the easement, because it is a really reduced. profile included planet tone, and
real earth materials. The state legislation on open-space. easements requires findings for desertion, and these would be used by the recommended resolution and are. laid out in information in the searchings for which are accessory G. The advised activity is. to conduct a public hearing to consider the recommendation.
It would certainly accept the agreement modifying open area easement 308277 and certify the needed.
desertion fee that parcels are called for by state law.
The resolution would certainly. The 3rd element of the.
advised activities is to embrace a regulation attachment B, which changes the initial.
prepared unit development.
And number four, to authorize application 181068 for seaside advancement permit, initial grading, and changes to the original authorizations to construct a single family residence, attached carport and swimming pool. To guide preparing to forward the taken on ordinance to the California Coastal. Payment for Certification. Which wraps up the team presentation. I think Mister— [Cabrera] Your microphone is silenced.- [Bruce] Any kind of remarks from the board? No comments, any type of comments from the general public?- [Cabrera] Okay, one audio speaker. – [Bruce] Okay. -[ Cabrera] To their name, Fuse Architects, your. microphone is un-muted. For the caller under Fuse Designer. -[ Deidre] Hi, can you hear me currently?- Yes. -Yes.- [Deidre]
Okay, I ' m Sorry. This is Deidre Hamilton.
And I wanted to simply give a. bit more information on the purpose of the elimination. of the open space easement.When the lot line modification was done, the objective of it was to allow. a larger building envelope because as Jerry mentioned, a lot of the remainder of the. home was exceptionally sloping. And one of the other. factors is the ancient sensitive locations that are. also discovered on the building, which limits the capability to. build and a lot of the remainder of the building. So it is essential that the. applicant be enabled to construct your home in this field. Or else it would certainly be a whole lot much more damaging to the environment, and I assume there would certainly be. a great deal more influences to the open room easement. I am readily available to address any inquiries you have about this, yet I would ask you to sustain. staff ' s referral.
– [Bruce] Thanks. Any type of various other public remarks?- [Cabrera] There ' s nothing else.
audio speakers to this item chair. – Okay, return to the board. Shut the public hearing. and return to the board for any activity.
( overlapping chatter) Wait just a minute, Supervisor Coonerty, just one moment.
– Sure, so, I suggest, I ' ll allow Manager Caput ask the question after that I ' m prepared to( indistinct).- Thank you.- Well, it ' s at least several.
Quality in this area.- After that the only various other. remark I ' ll make is, we ' re
speaking about high-end homes and likewise a gated area, that the only problem I had was the proposition is fine, yet I dislike to see even more and more. gated areas putting in when they ' re doing development.We ' re type of dividing people with cash from the remainder of the
public, developing walls, constructing gateway, locking individuals out, points like that so. Anyhow, it ' s just a concern of mine, yet the number of gated. communities are we gon na have( indistinct ), thanks.- Many Thanks, Mister Chair, I just wan na take a moment and acknowledge, you know,
Bonnie Dooners are not. peaceful about their opinions on different matters. Therefore I assume it ' s significant. that we haven ' t received any document to the. board about this job. And I wan na value the.
planning personnel'in addition to the architects and their team.
and the preparation payment. And I ' ll move authorization.
– That the movement, second by Friend.Clerk, please call the roll to approve the recommended activities. -Supervisor Koenig. – Aye. -[ Cabrera] Close friend.- Aye. -[ Cabrera] Coonerty. – Aye. – [Cabrera] Caput. – Aye. – [Cabrera] McPherson. – [McPherson] Aye. – Thanks, motion passes. – That ' s with one voice, alright, we will move to thing number nine, it ' s a public hearing to think about the recommendation of the. intending commission to accept application 201212 to. construct 21 brand-new townhomes on residential property situated at 3212 Goal Drive, assessor ' s parcel number 025-082-14. And verify that the task. receives a statutory exception from the California. Ecological High Quality Act or CEQUA and take associated activities as detailed in the memorandum. of the ordinary director. We have actually a sequenced legal. exception determination B. A preparation commission, February 24th, 2021 meeting products. It ' s on the internet link. C, a planning compensation. resolution 2021-01. D, a preparation commission staff record, 91 pages on-line and on documents, and E public communication for February 24th, 2020. intending commission hearing.Who ' s going to be making the discussion? I assume it ' s Jonathan. DeSalvo and Suzanne Ise and Jocelyn Drake from.
the preparation division. -[ Simply a moment right here,. Okay. Hey, I'' m not revealing.
Jocelyn Drake on the line. Okay, Miss Drake please.- ' Reason I did not have (Bruce chuckles).
( indistinct chatter) – [Bruce] Jonathan DeSalvo, okay, you'' re on. -We ' re on.
Good early morning chair and. participants of the board, Jonathan DeSalvo,.
intending division staff. The item prior to you is.
a proposition to create 21 two-story townhomes, each having 3 rooms. The project would certainly construct.
a mix of attached and removed housing as part of.
a common rate of interest advancement leading to 21 condo.
units within one great deal, with typical areas, for gain access to,.
auto parking and landscaping.This project requires approval of a community domestic development authorization with density bonus,. roadway-roadside exemption, over-height fence accreditation, and initial grading evaluation. Proposals for greater than. 20 residential units in the
RM-3 area area need testimonial and authorization by the board of supervisors. The subject parcel fronts on both Mission Drive and Thurber Lane, prolonging from the East. side of Mission Drive to the West side of Thurber lane.
The task site is. located in the light of preparing location within the area identified in the lasting. Santa Cruz Area plan, as the clinical district.
vital mark focus area.This locations secured by a large.
clinical solution centers at Dominican Health center and the Sutter Medical Facility, containing both neighborhood and regional offering industrial. usages and a mix of tool to high density domestic usages.
To establish a job, one existing solitary household. Existing home was built. The project website is surrounded.
to the North and South by both multifamily and solitary.
family property usages. 2 parcels surround the.
Northern building line consisting of five detached domestic devices and 16 two-story townhouse. 3 parcels surround the Southern boundary of the. task website including a solitary family members dwelling, a duplex with
an active permit application to legislate the 3rd unit, and 12 two-story townhomes.Across the road from the. job website to the East of web server line, is a huge primitive parcel.
determining about 6 acres in size, containing split commercial. zoning designations. To the West of the project site on the West side of Mission Drive, is a roughly two.
acre parcel established with clinical offices operating. As Cypress Medical. Surrounding residentially.
From the road, the proposed structures would certainly. The subject residential property is a. 0.88 acre whole lot located in the RM-3 or multifamily household 3000 square foot minimum area area, a designation which allows both attached and removed housing.
The proposed product would. And the zoning is constant. As the subject parcel
would.
The required front backyards are gauged for both rights of method.
Consequently front backyard problems. of 20 feet are used at both frontages.For the front backyard along Goal Drive, nearby averaging results. in minimized first story, front backyard problem need. of about 14 feet, 11 inches.
The basic 20 foot front backyard.
setback is still used to the 2nd story. Side yard troubles are.
eight feet, 5 feet. A waiver for a suggested small. advancement set into setbacks is looked for, which I will certainly discuss. later on in this discussion
. The height limitation is 28 feet. And the job as designated.
would be more than two feet below the elevation maximum.The floor location ratio or.
FAR demand is 50%. And the job looks for a. concession to exceed FAR by 8% for a complete FAR of 58 %, which I will likewise go over. later in this discussion
. The task meets all.
other websites criteria, including great deal protection and.
( indistinct )for parks. The task is qualified for. at 43% thickness reward to enable the advancement of 21. property devices in exchange for the arrangement of three affordable systems.
The overall number of units. permitted is calculated based upon the number of base devices. enabled as subject to the site ' s existing zoning and. general plan designation. This enables for 17.4 devices per acre, for that reason for the 0.88 acre site, the variety of base devices is 16 devices.
The task suggests to. To qualify for this thickness bonus offer, a minimum of 18 %of the base.
systems are called for to be provided as economical units. The project would certainly offer
one. economical device to be offered at the very low income level. at two moderate earnings level inexpensive units.The three budget-friendly devices. are included as component of the recommended development and will.
be regulated and limited to rent out and earnings limitations
subject. to a tape-recorded economical housing and
thickness reward agreement.
The continuing to be 18 units will. be readily available at market price.
Thickness Benefit Law allows an. applicant to demand certain motivations or giving ins. in order to make the task possible with the suggested. variety of real estate devices. This task gets approved for.
If necessary to allow, one giving in and might additionally ask for waivers of development criteria. building of the task.
The applicant has asked for. a concession to enhance the FAR demand from 50 to 58 %. This rise enables the. project to be included all three bedroom devices, which would certainly lead to
. Monetary price reductions for development.The applicant is. requesting 2 waivers for this task. These are first, a waiver to allow for exceptions from functional room requirements, and second, a waiver to permit minor advancements right into obstacles.
Stefan ' s approving a waiver from. In addition, the project is created.
And 2nd flooring veranda. causing an overall of regarding 318
to 448 square feet of private. useful workplace room per unit.
The asked for waiver from. setback criteria would permit small infringements as. 2nd tales only, of about 2 feet. into front yard obstacles, and around one foot 4 inches into side backyard problems. Tip one, approving a waiver. to offer small advancements into these problems as suitable. Considered that the parcel is. constricted because of the number 3 bed room devices recommended along.
with the needed affiliated website improvements, such as access car parking and workplace.
The task would provide. And one designated parking room.
supplied close-by each device. While areas can not. permit or are not enabled to call for thickness benefit. jobs to provide vehicle parking in enhancement to the per unit. auto parking ratio noted above, the project as proposed, willingly offer 6 added vehicle parking spaces on site for a. total amount of 48 auto parking spaces.The job recommends to. construct 20 attached and one detached townhome. The building massing would. comply with a linear arrangement as is typical for townhouse advancements. And it will basically be. mirrored on the North and
South sides of the interior gain access to means, prolonging with the great deal. The suggested townhouses would certainly. contains three bedroom, 4 strategies mentoring around. 1300 square feet in size. Kitchens, living spaces and garages, are suggested at the initial story, and rooms are recommended. at the 2nd tales, with attic storage room given above.
Townhouses are a type of. The surrounding area consists. North from Soquel drive.
The massing of the project. fits with the bordering area which the website is surrounded. by tool to high density household development in a. transitionary neighborhood.For area code, 24 feet is the recommended
minimum width for two method circulation.
within indoor driveways. The driveway layout has.
been reviewed both by DPW Roadway Engineering and. the Central Fire Division, and meets area style. criteria and fire requirements.
Thurber lane frontages, the existing streets do not satisfy area design criteria criteria. The task would certainly tie into. Staff supports that demand for.
That is meeting on February. 24th, 2021 Preparation Commission voted with one voice to advise. that board of supervisors authorize the task. No adjustments or further. conditions were included by the preparation payment.
Thank you, Supervisor McPherson, I ' m I ' m Jerry Shrub with Annette Olson and Suzanne Ise. Below ' s the Northern area of the parcel. Right here ' s a sight of the capacity, well, this is a sight from Brisa Del Mar looking down throughout the Ag parcel in the direction of the growth.- Sure, so, I suggest, I ' ll let Manager Caput ask the question then I ' m prepared to( indistinct). – That ' s unanimously, all right, we will move to item number nine, it ' s a public hearing to think about the suggestion of the.To date, because the planning payment conference, the department has gotten one letter in opposition
to the proposed project, which was forwarded to
your board for review. No various other public communication
has been obtained. As recommending condition, the project is constant
with all applicable codes and policies of the zoning
statute and basic plan.And we ' ll
additionally more strategy
objectives of achievable real estate, vibrant economic situation, and a.
sustainable setting. Team consequently suggests.
that your board figured out that the project is excluded from.
additionally ecological evaluation under the California.
Ecological Quality Act, and accept application number 201212, based upon the problems and findings affixed to the team record. This concludes our discussion, staff is readily available for any kind of questions. And I think the applicant.
Chris Coomer from CKA Architects may also have a brief.
Discussion. Okay, we'' ll. Thank you, Mister DeSalvo.
that presentation now? I assume that'' d appertain to see? -[ Chris] Yes, give thanks to you.Can you hear me, Mister Chair?- [Bruce] Yes, sir. – [Chris] All Right, thanks. Jonathan, I'' ll attempt to share screen. It claims I can refrain that.
while you were sharing. There you go. Great, thank you, Mister Chair.
and participants of the board. My name is Chris Coomer of.
CKA Architects in Menlo Park. I am satisfied to be below today to.
existing this project to you. As Jonathan discussed, this is an infill website situated.
extremely close to Soquel Drive, specifically near to the.
bus stop on Soquel Drive. It'' s additionally located amongst.
existing two-story multifamily developments to the.
North and to the South. There'' s the medical facility on this side. And the idea would be that.
potentially individuals operating at the healthcare facility and the medical office.
buildings would certainly have the ability to reside in these townhouses. As discussed, this task takes.
advantage of the state'' s Density Perk Legislation by offering the three affordable systems. The project is eligible for.
As discussed, the job is created. To the North once again, we ' ve got 2 tale. Additionally, there ' s a covered bike vehicle parking.
When conference with the neighbors, it ended up being quite apparent that. parking was the significant concern in the location. So the project team included 6.
extra car parking areas near the Thurber Lane side to.
And the last action that was taken. It ' s preferably located for transit. And that ' s where the.
We ' ve gone over the called for. And the devices on the South side have 318 square feet of open room. You ' ll see the project is.
photovoltaics solar panels. So the objective for the task.
is to use these roofing systems to power the entire task with electrical power. There won ' t be gas meters set up. And likewise from the Thurber side, you ' ll see the South dealing with roofings again.And the mix of products is.
indicated to enhance the contemporary design with natural wood, stuck with home siding and some steel accents. We think this site is preferably. situated for an advancement such as this near transit. and near the healthcare facility. We wish that the South facing. roofs are a good style to make the most of making use of solar. power to power the task, the project group has worked. with the neighbors to deal with auto parking and privacy concerns. We supplied around. 3 times the amount of open room that ' s required for the project.We hope it ' s an appealing.
mix of products in a contemporary design.
And really likewise thrilled that we ' re able to. That ' s really what supports. Direction to address the housing crisis we ' re dealing with.
– Thank you for that discussion.- That ' s appropriate. Any type of remarks from the board?
Any type of remarks from the public? We presently have.
no audio speakers to this product.
– Okay, we'' ll close the public hearing, return it to the board. And I simply wan na claim, I'' m pleased to see even more. multi-family systems going in and that programmers are.
capitalizing on the benefit thickness. And specifically this we'' re. mosting likely to learn through a little later this afternoon around.
Being delicate to the parking spaces that are needed.
It'' s very important for that location. The concern I have is, it does permit for three budget-friendly units and 2 would certainly be what? Modest revenue and.
And moderate I presume revenue is considered budget-friendly real estate? You might notice this project has.
a rather uncommon element in that it has an extremely.
reduced income available for sale unit.The reason for
that commonly.
are our action J cost effective program that the majority of you.
may perhaps familiar with, any type of budget-friendly systems in a.
for-sale job are restricted at the modest income degree, that prevails for these kinds of programs throughout the state. The factor this task has.
one extremely low revenue system is due to the fact that as it is taking advantage.
of the Density Bonus Law, there belongs in.
that Thickness Bonus Offer Law at the state level that calls for substitute.
If, of real estate supply that was formerly on the site.
it fulfilled particular specifications. So briefly, this property had one.
rental device on it previous, or it may still have it on there, which will certainly be knocked down for this task. Now, the state regulation needs that we determine if the device was economical in a selection of definitions. One of those definitions is if the, any type of occupant within the past.
5 years of such an existing unit was in reality, a very reduced or reduced earnings house, after that they need to change.
that what is taken into consideration by the state kind of a defacto inexpensive unit.They need to replace that within. the task in order to be able to capitalize.
of the thickness perk. Basically, the candidate.
was required to, you recognize, collaborate with the renter, have them kind of proclaim what.
their income got on a form that they offered to us. And afterwards we established they.
remained in reality, very reduced income. That implied that one of their.
3 economical devices had to be very low. And that'' s the exact same kind of.
demand that we examine that a substitute housing.
requirement for any type of project that is getting the density incentive. – Yeah, and modest earnings.
is considered what income for let'' s claim a family members of four? – So I can provide you what the typical is. And that'' s the center.
of the moderate range.It is 110,000 for a family members of four. The ceiling for moderate.
is I believe it'' s currently close to 130,000. So it'' s a lot more than you may believe. The revenue restrictions for this.
location and for much of California are actually changed upwards.
by HUD to reflect how high the dominating housing prices are. So those figures put on'' t mean. that individuals generally in fact earn that a lot, yet that they would need to.
– Okay, and then finally, there'' s low income and very low earnings, those variable income. That ' s around the$ 50,000 range? Currently I believe it'' s around.
that we'' re speaking about be on-site, or are they paying cash to have it developed maybe someplace else. – One intriguing part of.
the Thickness Perk Legislation is that they may not be offered offsite. They have to be within the task. To make sure that'' s type of a wonderful feature.
of the Thickness Bonus Offer Regulation. They will.
be within this project, and we'' ve already scoped.
out with the programmer which devices they will be. They'' re uniformly dispersed.
throughout the task. – Okay, thanks significantly. – Any other remarks? – Simply a couple of remarks. Thanks, Mister Coomer.
and Mister DeSalvo for the discussions. I think this job is.
incredibly well designed. It'' s interesting to see. that you ' re placing in all electrical units that.
won'' t also have gas meters and that ' s a terrific action. forward in terms of sustainability for our neighborhood. I think you'' ve taken.
outstanding steps to make up transportation factors to consider in the area, consisting of having onsite bike auto parking, the deed restrictions that.
protect against people from consuming their garages for storage space, and additionally providing complimentary.
Metro passes to citizens to motivate transit use.I believe that'' s a fantastic thinking about.
exactly how close this task is to a bus stop. And obviously, to actually one of the key corridors, Soquel Method or Soquel Drive.
corridor in our neighborhood. It'' s a terrific means to.
capitalize on that. And certainly, I think.
plainly as planning said, the proposition fits well with.
the size of existing units that are already in the location, the 16 townhomes to the North, the 12 townhouses immediately to the South of the parcel as well.So I enjoy to sustain this job and thank you for your good work. With that, I ' ll move. the recommended actions.
– I ' ll second. – Relocated and seconded. Any type of other remarks from the board. Clerk, please call the roll.- Thank you, Supervisor Koenig.- [Koenig] Aye. – Close friend. – Aye. – [Cabrera] Coonerty. – [Coonerty] Aye. – Caput. – [Caput] Aye. – McPherson. – Aye. – [Cabrera] Thank you,.
movement passes all. – Thank you. We will now relocate to thing.
number 10 to think about report on American Rescue Plan Act of 2020, approved the County of Santa Cruz, ARPA, healing strategy of $52,988,000, guide the County administrative office to return May 18th, 2021, to accept funds in , 2020/21, and accept the first month-to-month upgrade and take associated actions as laid out in the memorandum of the area administrative policeman. A, we have the American Rescue Plan allocation examples add-on A. The ARPA strategy SCC accessory B, the ARPPA plan SCC.
expenses add-on C, and the COVID-19 update accessory D. Mister Palacios, you were going to present.
this to us, please. – Yes. Chairman McPherson and.
participants of the board. I'' m very happy and. delighted with this work that team has done in this item.
and it'' s incredibly complex.And yet they ' ve needed to
do that. under a great deal of time pressure. So congratulations to team, and I ' d like to present. Christina Mallory, who ' s led our team in this effort, our area budget plan supervisor, and she will additionally be. offering with Eric Friedrich, one of our CAO experts.- Thanks, Carlos. And excellent morning Chairman McPherson and participants of the board, Christina Mallory, our. area spending plan supervisor. So I ' m delighted today to be.
Our schedule today, we ' ll offer an upgrade on. Following slide, Eric, there you go. American Rescue Plan Act.
And at that time,
we had a gap estimated approximated Regarding55 million to address resolve revenue profits. And the County is. This funding is planned to first, cover our expenses, and second to cover our income losses, which will assist the area.
covering our COVID response sets you back that we believe are. real for the rest of this year and sustain our personnel by. getting rid of the furlough.
Making investments in our community, by remaining to sustain
. our area partners and making tiny investments. in infrastructure and beginning to recover our. books as funding permits, and as we navigate the timing. of the FEMA reimbursements.So below you can see an upgrade.
of our COVID-19 sources. Now approximated 152.5 million, consisting of the American Rescue.
Plan financing of 52.9 million and FEMA financing of. approximated at 44 million. It ' s estimated only 80 %of.
our FEMA eligible expenses, based on our previous experience,
we understand that FEMA won ' t. repay us a hundred percent of our expenses, yet we are gon na claim a. hundred percent of our costs and'expect the most effective. And after that this is countered. by our profits losses of 28.4 million.
And our COVID feedback costs. for an overall of 128.1 million, leaving a tiny space of concerning$ 4 million, which our team believe might be. resolved by a few of the homeless financing as needed for several of. the shelter and treatment expenses, which is most of. our FEMA eligible expenses
. It ' s essential to remember as you pay attention to the presentation, and as we go forward.That these quantities are estimates based on the info'. we contend this time around. Details will alter, especially since we place ' t. got complete guidance yet from the US Treasury on how.
to assert these expenses. We are gon na be recommending, as you ' ve seen in the report, to provide you monthly updates so that we can make adjustments. as needed as we move forward. So now I ' d like to turn the. discussion over to Eric, and he ' ll review some of the information.
All right, thanks
, Christina. Chairman McPherson and.
expert to the CAO ' s office. And I'' ll be emceeing the.
remainder of the discussion here this morning. As you all might know the. American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 was authorized and authorized by.
Enjoyable truths, the ARPA assigns $362. And you can trace the red line.
on the left down to specifically just how much it was being. designated to areas. That converts right into the area. being expected to receive$ 52.99 million on indirect assistants from.
the federal government.Couldn ' t fairly make it to 53 million also, yet 52.99.
And I will emphasize this, I believe it ' s pretty crucial, that this will be received. As Christina has claimed that while we ' re still waiting. We wear ' t exist in the vacuum below locally, and we desired to highlight that.
that numerous jurisdictions here in Santa Cruz Region have. Gotten financing from the American Rescue Strategy Act. And while$ 53 million coming. to the Area seems
like a whole lot, and it is, we wished to show that as. a portion of our total basic funds, this make up regarding 8.5 %. of the county ' s basic fund,
when you contrast that. to several of our peers, we ' re in fact on the lower.'end of a financing obtained from the American Rescue Plan Act, when you search in regards to general budget.And that produces some intricacy and that we require to be a little. bit extra cautious around just how exactly we designate and.
spend our resources, because simply the sheer. scale of area government,$
53 million doesn ' t go quite regarding some
of the allotments from. our neighboring territory. So what are we mosting likely to be doing? Well, we have a'diverse approach in alloting the entire amounts.
And what we ' re showing you. today is the total amount.And we decided for complexity purpose, to not simplify by. year one versus year two, because once again, this funding is mosting likely to be.
gotten in 2 tronches.
And so, yet in total, the 52.99 million, we '
re gon na be looking. to continue our response and mitigation costs insurance coverage.
of concerning 24.6 million. And we ' re anticipated to be able to recover some revenue losses of about 20.4 million. And what that does is that. it allows us to, again, react to COVID-19 also on all the mitigating prices needed, it ' ll aid us eliminate. piling for furloughs, make infrastructure financial investments,.
and restore gets. And it ' ll also assist us. navigate FEMA compensations as we relocate forward with the emergency.
And we ' ll talk more around. that a little later on.
A multi-year expenditure. And they can be usually.
organized right into some of these nine groups and have them.
Many of these are just continuations of points we ' ve currently been doing. To some highlights, I ' ll go over below, to proceed with our. It offers complimentary.
And once we would ask the. board ' s responses on today exists is a certain pail of that relates to board guided. COVID-19 response in which we ' re looking for your advice on exactly how best
to use regarding a million bucks well worth of this financing to.
And this is a significant change from. Whereas formerly regional.
in the direction of our revenue losses, which is
greatly different from how
the private field had been dealt with. This regulation does, and we
' re extremely happy. that it does offer us to supplement or to supplant. our revenue losses.The law itself requires that. we compute our earnings losses based of our standard of our 2019 real. Therefore when we apply that formula, we estimate that we can. cover concerning$ 28.4 million. Currently 77 %of that, or about 22 million is directly.
back to the general fund. What are we gon na do.
with the earnings losses that we ' re able to recuperate? Well, most importantly, I ' m actually thrilled to discuss today which we ' ll be aiming to. end the staffing furlough that we put in location in July of 2020. Now the CAO ' s workplace is.
prepared in the coming weeks to release our suggested allocate next year. And in that budget plan, we will certainly be advising that. we remove fifty percent of the staffing furlough. With this earnings loss. recovery from the ARPA funds, we can currently seek to. remove the second fifty percent of the furlough this coming July.
Really thrilled.
Our personnel has worked.
And this financing is really handy to getting us back to where we need to be.Secondly, this revenue. And I can talk concerning those in. I ' m gon na go a little bit right into the information around this, but it ' s an actually
important essential because due to the fact that is a major headwind in our.
There'' s the health center on this side. Instructions to solve the real estate dilemma we ' re facing.- I ' ll secondly. Well, primary and very first, I ' m actually excited to speak regarding today and that we ' ll be looking to. I ' m gon na go a little bit into the information around this, however it ' s a really
important vital subject since is a major significant in our.So, as Christina pointed out in the start of the discussion, area personnel, we estimate
that concerning $55 million is considered eligible to
be declared through FEMA, via the end of September of this year.Now we additionally approximate kind of based off of
previous practices and discussions with numerous
professionals that we, possibly 20% of that can
be potentially disallowed. So although FEMA lately
was given an executive order to reimburse 100% of the
expense of the emergency situation, that doesn'' t mean that'they ' ve. transformed what their allocations or disallowance are. The 2nd problem around this is additionally that, while it'' s at 55 million now, that number can expand.
and we could have various other unanticipated COVID-19 prices that we would certainly require to be able.
The second threat related.
As we recognize from previous techniques, from various other calamities that we ' ve had, whether they'' ve been roadways. Being a financial deficiency, which we ' re hoping to cover. 15 sort of high degree pails of uses that we ' ll be making use of.
readily available for any questions.- Thank you for that.
understandable presentation of the situations. And regardless of my remarks before. about my problems for being all inclusive, I ' m really appreciative of the.
moneying we ' re receiving from the government and state federal governments. I wan na give thanks to the CAO
and his staff for bringing this item ahead. I ' m eased that we have.
I understand that there was.
One of the worries, as you ' ve. It ' s kind of a wait and see, we put on ' t have pure
clarity, but yet you for trying to. I have some inquiries, however any various other comments from the board?
worked rather hard to make certain that this would actually come through.On the FEMA established apart. that we ' re gon na hold, I would certainly like as component of. the regular monthly records back,
although it ' s gon na take a bit, record certain to that funding, ' cause I wan na make certain. that if we start obtaining reimbursements, I assume the board would certainly such as adaptability on just how to direct that. moneying moving onward, in contrast to just sort of. having it'rest out there. Not that money remains there, yet we ' d like 'to have a say in it. In relation to the board guided financing, and I was collaborating with. Manager Coonerty on this idea.
There ' s a lot of areas that. And so I assume that part of.
Undoubtedly I ' d like to, we ' ll need with the treasury. And I value that as always, on'things like parks configuring that is crucial to
the. I think that we need things.
that will really have longterm financial and job-related. benefits in our community. And to have a few of this. funding similar to the 2009 ARRA Funds really did aid begin a rather substantial. shift in financial advantages for our area. So according to those. financial investments can additionally be a framework conference and
re doing parks or spending in brand-new. parks or renovating roadways, and I heard what you said, Mister Friedrich concerning the.
roadway part and several of the, you understand, not knowing as for some of the FEMA.
I like to see something that ' s substantial
on the longerMuch longer I understand that there was words.
The 2 components of'this, or the three components of this are, maintaining us up to day on the FEMA cash so that we know. I ' m pressing for broadband, and I and Supervisor Coonerty has some additional ideas of that, and the third point is that, financial investments in points that are actually facilities.
Supervisor Coonerty.- Thank you, Mister Chair. I wan na simply take a. minute and appreciate that the federal collaboration we have, it ' s felt for much of the last year.
And after that,'so as supervisor Fred stated, I ' m gon na wait till we hear.$ 400,000 for programs to sustain service advancement with a focus on women
. And I believe if we can partner with a little organization development facility and some other programs, we can truly aid.
I assume it ' d be, I put on ' t mind the proposal but I would wish that maybe we ' d have the CAO come back with a conclusive proposition. I ' m on the exact same page with what your ideas are overall. Manager Caput, do you have any type of remarks?
you also and anybody else I ' m leaving out.Yeah, my problem is the very same as it'was currently discussed. FEMA, that cash, that ' s a national pot of cash. that goes out across the country. What happens if we had an additional cyclone or tornado or a fire.
someplace in the country, a whole lot of FEMA cash.
What impact would. I don ' t recognize if any person can answer that.
You know, I assume they won ' t understand how much it will certainly set you back till it ' s all stated and done.
and they ' ve collection aside to the very best of their ability.I believe it ' s important for us. We are focusing on obtaining our claims in as fast as possible, so that we'can obtain them. obliged and funded. And you understand I ' m certain. in staff '
s capacity to do that and we ' re just gon na do the very best we can. And I think the truth that.
– And if the amount.- And that ' s why we ' ve collection apart some of the American Rescue Strategy. America Rescue Strategy funding.But also,
if we get.
And I don ' t assume it will certainly be an issue to carve out a million, two, as opposed to a. million for the board. And clearly there ' ll.- You bet, and I ' m extremely confident that you and the remainder of your
stuff things everybody everyone figure this out.
– Supervisor Koenig.- Thank you chair. Thank you Mister Fredrick. and thanks Miss Mallory for the record. Simply have a couple of. inquiries to ensure I ' m reading this properly. As for understanding what money, you understand, what expenses we ' ve currently sustained and need to
primarily reimburse and what cash would be spending for those programs going forward.And I want probably you have a. little more discernment over. I ' m looking at add-on C and am I comprehending it properly? If I'check out the amount. asked for 20 to 21 as kind of being cash we ' ve already spent and what ' s requested for 21,. 22 as what ' s moving forward
? That reasonable? -Sorry, yes, that ' s correct.
– Okay, great. And then, you'understand, I additionally wan na echo Manager Pal ' s aim that the much more we can utilize this cash to make investments and. reap lasting financial advantages the better. You recognize, I believe some of the, as an example, a few of the programs, the online programs that. parks has been running a truly wonderful, I'' m just wondering if, you know, we come out of the pandemic by June 15th, as you understand
the state is recommending we might with enough injections, could a few of that cash as an example,'digital parks programs
, be reapportioned to spending. in parks framework.- Definitely that ' s a possibility.You understand, one of the points. is that it will take time for parks income losses to recover. And so we ' ve rested. on some additional appropriations from CalWORKs. to help fund some of their distance knowing. Some of that funding wasn ' t. available for next year, yet maybe in the May modify, to ensure that can help cost-free. Up some cash. We ' re kind of waiting. to see what occurs with the May modify. Certainly if there is, if they wear ' t demand that. funding for their range discovering programs, then we might designate it elsewhere, yes.- Got it, and comparable. concern for the 3 million for paid unwell leave going forward.Where did that number come
from? Is that based upon kind of.
And, you understand, it seems like we'are, you recognize, with more and. It was tough for us to approximate. We did approximate the 3 million basically based on our experience.
And then we took a look at what the price might possibly be January through, for this present year, for existing schedule year, via the end of the program. And then we looked at the percentage of experience we had in the last program, which is regarding 25%. If every employee took the 80 hours that they ' re qualified to, it would certainly be including our additional aid, which are
also additionallyQualified
A lot of our staff members. don ' t need the financing, it ' s there for them to help them.And if they need it we will certainly provide it. To make sure that we might have some financial savings there. We simply put on ' t recognize at this factor,- Right, and what I ' m. hearing you saying is that it ' s additionally essentially. cover with next wintertime. So if you recognize, we get some frustrating versions or any kind of other unforeseen obstacles we ' re taking care of in the. dark months this coming year, we would have it offered for that. And if, you recognize, if that cash kind of in. the employees division, would it have, I imply it would have to be. recycled for personnel uses if we ' re not, and we put on ' t wind up utilizing it for?- No, your board could. reallocate it to anything. It ' s money alloted. for that objective based on'our experience so much. and what we assume we need.But like I said, when we come back month to month, we ' ll give your board an update. So any one of the funding assigned. to any of the'numerous items that haven ' t been gotten, like
several of our community assistance funds will certainly have been contracted, and wouldn ' t necessarily be designated, yet these various other pots of cash, we could quickly reallocate that financing.- Okay. That ' s excellent to understand.
And after that you referenced. a neighborhood program or neighborhood programs.And I was simply curious. For the Great Plates Delivered program, just how much longer would that be.
moneyed with this appropriation?- So'we ' ve put a plan with each other. I indicate, it ' s essentially. through September, when we think the emergency.
will certainly be declared over yet we actually don ' t recognize, to ensure that we believe with September ' s where most of our expenses are. Therefore the division managing the match on that program has actually included.
costs through September.- Great. Great', that ' s all my inquiries. Thanks.- [Christina] Certain.- Okay, I believe possibly some. of that ' s been answered on web page 201, an expected COVID relevant. expense with seven million reserved because group'. If we don ' t end up needing that funding, do we have any very early ideas. of just how we might set it
or just how we can reprogram it? -Yes, there ' s a, we place ' t really.
( Christina laughes) So it does take a procedure. We believe we ' ll have, we ' ll understand fairly
a bitLittle bit And each month we ' re.
gon na obtain even more info. So I couldn ' t tell you at this factor'but certainly I assume we ' ve.
determined some programs in the strategy where we didn ' t. feel we had enough funding.Health services is obtaining.
rather a bit of funding for their equity programs, yet they have actually an enhanced requirement there. There ' s a suicide avoidance program that we ' ve been wishing to fund and we'place ' t identified. any type of cash for that program.
And Eric, I think you. can correct me there. There ' s another number of programs that staff determined where it could assist develop. several of the modern technology framework in terms. of software program to help us be better prepared. for that following emergency, where staff would certainly like.
to make investments, however we'didn ' t feel like. those were the highest concern now, but if funding it comes to be available
, your board could guide we. invest cash there as well'.
– Okay, thanks.
If perhaps if we ask the CAO, you ' ve heard the conversation now and I put on ' t know that if we need to make any kind of definitive choices today, the length of time would certainly you such as to find back to us with a more straight appropriations. to particular programs? Would certainly you want a number of weeks or wait for the next month and does. that injured us by waiting?- We ' d like instructions as soon as feasible, that would certainly be helpful.So if you were to.
provide instructions today, as an example relating to the.
And after that with a plan. I might be with that since like I stated, I assume those are, I simply wan na make certain we.
I just wan na be delicate.
Obviously I ' d like to, we ' ll need with the treasury. I think it ' d be, I put on ' t mind the proposition but I would wish that perhaps we ' d have the CAO come back with a clear-cut proposal. You understand, I believe they won ' t recognize just how much it will set you back till it ' s all stated and done.
We just wear ' t recognize at this point,- Right, and what I ' m. hearing you saying is that it ' s also primarily. We think we ' ll have, we ' ll understand rather
a bit.And one point I'' d like to make a change to the direction that we'' ve had is for the chair to compose a letter to the congressional delegation asking for aid in a prompt processing of FEMA to the area for COVID associated costs.I assume we ought to attempt to be specific in that request and ask them to do that. But it ' s approximately the board how they want to move ahead with the board guided actions. I guess that ' s the main point we ' re making below. If we'wan na make a decision on that today, or await another two weeks for Mister Palacios to come back to us.
– Directly I'' d like to wait. That'' s a Supervisor Caput. -I indicate, I really feel that as'Mister Chair that we ' re providing a structure and they ' re still coming back with specifics. I indicate, we'' re not in fact assigning the cash today. Therefore what this was, was giving Support around- a structure. – What that would certainly be. Yeah, I mean that was the demand of the recommended actions was that we in fact supply this direction today. So I was stepping forward prepared to do that and as well Supervisor Coonerty. So I wish to relocate onward with doing that and seeing what team comes near, what those resemble? ' ' Reason as I said earlier, initially from a theoretical viewpoint, these are the important things that we'' re thinking about, what it appears like to make sure that it actually certifies as an allowable expenditure as component of what requires to be evaluated and what kind of program could actually be applied as a result of that is what they would certainly be coming back in a number of weeks with.
– Okay.
– And afterwards. Yeah, I much like to include, I believe, you understand, I think the concept was to kind of obtain the sphere rolling on a couple of these programs however as I think Manager Koenig and Supervisor Good friend discussed it, I suggest I think that CAO'' s workplace is being conservative as regard to ill leave and to FEMA reimbursements, which as they should be and as we all ought to be, however to the level that those get solved there will certainly be I think( indistinct) extra dollars in the future to allot and we can eagerly anticipate even more board input, yet this was just to type of get the discussion began on some actual needs we saw emerging out of the pandemic.
– Yeah, alright. Yeah. Then there'' s always board members could create a few other referrals in 2 weeks and that discussion also, if they desired. I don'' t know if that, we wan na make the motion to that, I wan na most likely to the general public
( indistinct) for public input. – Yes, thanks, I have three speakers for public comment. Customer 2195, your microphone will be un-muted – [Becky] Hello, can you hear me? – [Bruce] Yes. – [Becky] Thank you. This is Becky Steinbruner from country Aptos. This is a shocking amount of money and I don'' t understand how our region, how our country is ever before going to recover from every one of this however I'' m. grateful there is assistance involving Santa Cruz Region for these programs. I value the board'' s request that there be normal reports on the FEMA reimbursements. And I wish that those records continue for this very.
large amount of cash too, to give some openness.
and responsibility for just how they are invested. I'' m delighted that the. furloughs will be finishing. I wish to know if the jobs that were cut will certainly be brought back.
such as the very essential full time paid placement.
for the county'' s office of emergency situation management.Rosemary Anderson ' s. task was cut and I really feel, and numerous do, that this
. region suffered therefore.
There ' s repayment to sheriff and probation however absolutely nothing for fire. I would like to see area fire and fire personnel. Your board has actually gone over.
would actually buy the.
-'[ Bruce] That ' s a wrap, alright.- [Cabrera] Calling individual three, your microphone is un-muted. -[ Marilyn] Hi, this is Marilyn Gareth. I ' m really disappointed to listen to concerning all this pressing for broadband, which is harmful microwave radiation. You ' ve obtained several papers and referrals of resources verifying this. And I ' m reasoning of a publication, “Bees, Birds and The human race. Destroying Nature” by Electrosmog. We can ' t live without the .
Fires have been caused.
therefore there ' s overall disregarding of the truths and similar to, “Oh, just how excellent this is?” Well, “it can kill you. and permanently harm the setting.
Oh, I simply, amazing. Physician Martin Paul is another source. He ' s a professor of Meredith, a biochemistry and biology and basic clinical science.
He priced quote showing significant. influences of harm from no-ionizing radiation from. these sources like wise meters, broadband, Wi-Fi, antennas, nerve system damage,. and constant damage, oxidative stress and anxiety, DNA damage, rise programmed cell fatality, lower fertility, increased cancer by 15.
We will return to the board for activity. I believe that certainly board members would certainly be welcome to come back with any kind of other recommendations they could wan na include to board guided items, even though we have. And likewise I ' d like to simply.
add to the motion that,'to direct the chair to compose a letter to the delegation, legislative delegation for.
processing a FEMA compensation to the area for the COVID associated costs. I assume simply show them how.
important that is to us. – Yeah, so Mister Chair, I'' d like to move the advised activities, consist of the direction that the chair connected to.
our legislative delegation to assist with COVID.
There ' s no thrill. And we ' ll probably have much more information at that time. -'That ' d be great, thank you.
– Thanks, Manager Koenig?- [Koenig] Aye.- Good friend?- Aye. -[ Cabrera] Coonerty?- [Coonerty] Aye. – Caput? – [Caput] Aye. – McPherson?- [McPherson] Aye. – [Cabrera] Thanks,. motion passes with one voice.
– And, you know, I wan na just make one, thank you once again to the CAO ' s office, yet thank you to our area workers for weathering this terrible storm that we ' ve been going through for. It ' s above and beyond the telephone call of duty and we thank you really.
We will certainly currently go to product number 11, a public hearing to think about. this collection of tasks, after that licensed in the. center of (indistinct )21 neighborhood growth
block grant, CDBG application to the. state of The golden state. Doctor Resolution licensing.
the staff to make an application for the 2021 CDBG funds.
And I believe Porcilla. Wilson be presenting to us from the area planning department.
Porcilla Wilson is our real estate specialist, and she ' ll be drawing up a slide, a couple of slides on this program. Good morning board. Today ' s public meeting.
The County of Santa Cruz is. Under the NOFA, the county is eligible for.
The county ' s application can. consist of up to three activities, with a total amount of say goodbye to. than one and a half million. Limitations are revealed per task and funds for activities.
expense ought to be decreased by 7%, which is general administration costs that are repaid to the.
region for implementing these activities. Eligible activities under this NOFA consist of home buyer aid
, housing rehab for single family members units.These are finances that go to. house owners or home purchasers, civil services, which need to be expanded or brand-new programs, financial tasks, such as service assistance, micro venture help. or facilities and helpful organizations. Tasks can not be comparable. to tasks presently funded in an open 2018 CDBG give.
Those tasks are planning and technical aid give, which is funding the Davenport Domestic Water Feasibility Research Study, and a multifamily recovery job which is for moneying a strength. Dahlia housing project. Public facilities and facilities financing were not offered. as component of this year ' s NOFA, as HCD oversubscribed
. in the previous years. And it ' s moneying those jobs.
as funds come to be offered. All CDBG tasks must.
address a nationwide purpose. This is mostly.
fulfilled through a benefit to reduced earnings homes, particularly real for public. solutions tasks.
Staff held an informative. meeting on March 11th, for viewpoint candidates.
Two proposals were obtained both asked for the optimum enabled of$ 500,000 under the public solutions task. The first proposal came from the humanist solutions department, housing for health, which requested financing. The recommended action.
Staff and representatives from, I think, the proposals are available
should you have any kind of concerns? And this ends personnel ' s discussion.- [Remarks from the board? I put on ' t see any, fine. We will go to the public.
Thanks. Okay, second call for Deutron. Okay, they ' re utilizing an. older variation of Zoom and they ' re not able to unmute.
Hi board, Raymon Cancino, CEO of
Community Bridges.I just would like to thank say thanks to, Porcilla and the rest remainder the team, Susan, for their consideration factor to consider our project job was submitted. As we recognize, the moratorium, the rental halt will finish and we have been recognizing individuals that may need extra assistance, consisting of lawful assistance. Our clients have been truly speaking to the demand of stunningly, not only a right to advise discussion, however a chance of an unmet need in our area with.
Individuals that are.
There ' s only a handful of. And the bulk of them do.
moneying for at first starting a project like this, and thanks to'the Packard Foundation
, they ' ve invited us right into a larger proposition.
We ' ve been working with. Deutron, once more we ' re unable. I ' ll relocation.
request the center of balance for the suggested 2021-22.
benefit evaluations proceed the public.
– Thank you and great morning. Thank you Chairman, board of supervisors. The item before you is a. public hearing for advantage assessment price increases for CSAs three, 13a, 18 and 28.
Our duty is merely to.
execute their demands. And chair as you mentioned, the recommended action today is to open up the public hearing and listen to. objections or arguments
if any, to the recommended benefit. evaluations for CSAs. Number 3, Aptos Seascape, number 13a Oak flat, number 18 Whitehouse Canyon.
– Any concerns from board participants? Any type of concerns from the public? – Chair, I ' ll relocate the suggested activities and additionally with appreciation for the CSAs.
Manager Koenig? Aye.
Cabrera] Buddy?- Aye.- [Cabrera] Coonerty? – [Coonerty] Aye. – [Cabrera] Caput. -[ Caput] Aye. – [Cabrera] McPherson?- [Bruce] Aye. – [Cabrera] Thanks,. activity passes all. – Okay, we will most likely to product. number 13 as a board of supervisors for the Davenport Area. Sanitation District to consider accepting in.
principle statute D-96 to change title 4.04, short article five,
section 4.04.446. Private sewage system maintenance of the
Davenport County Sanitation District Code, think about suggested notice of exemption from the California. Environmental High Quality Substitute Soquel and set up the statute for final adoption on. the next readily available program as outlined in the memorandum. of the district designer of regulation number D-96. DCSD code amendments.Amendments with the. DCSD code that strike out the underlying Soquel Notification of Exemption of the Davenport Region.
Sanitation District and from the Davenport. Area Sanitation Area Homeowners Organization. leaflet ordinance D-96.
I believe Maria Warnkley and Sonia Lykins for our.
public jobs division is going to offer on this.- This is Ashleigh Trujillo. I ' m with Santa Cruz Area.
Sanitation Area, this is for the Davenport. County Cleanliness Area.
And as such the district is proposing that we offer owners of exclusive
.
I ' m available for questions.- Thank you, Miss Trujillo Any type of remarks from the board? I ' ll relocation authorization.
As board of directors for the Liberty Region Cleanliness Area, think about accepting in. Area Cleanliness Area Code outbreak underlying. The Freedom Region Cleanliness Area flyer concerning statute F-27.
Again, we ' re simply intending to offer a longer timeline for proprietors of exclusive collection systems to submit the required. evaluations and reports. So we advise that you consider this ordinance at
27 in. principle amending Title II, Article V, area 3.04446, private sewage system upkeep of the
Flexibility Area Hygiene District Code.Consider the recommended notification of exemption from the California. Environmental Top quality Act and route the staff of the board to position regulation number F-27. on the next available schedule for last fostering. And I ' m available for concerns.- Thanks. Thank you again. Any kind of questions from the. board of supervisors? Seeing none. Do we have any kind of questions from the public? -There are no audio speakers. on this item chair.- Okay. We will certainly go back to the board. of supervisors for action.- I ' ll move for approval.
– I ' ll second. – Relocated by Caput. Seconded by Good friend.
Staff, please call the roll. – [Cabrera] Thank you.
I don'' t recognize if that, we wan na make the movement to that, I wan na go to the public
– And, you understand, I wan na simply make one, thank you once more to the CAO ' s office, yet thank you to our region employees for weathering this dreadful tornado that we ' ve been going through for. Today ' s public meeting. The county ' s application can. I ' m with Santa Cruz Area.Manager Koenig? – [Koenig] Aye. – Good friend. – Aye. – [Cabrera] Coonerty? – [Coonerty] Aye. – Caput? – [Caput] Aye. – McPherson? – [McPherson] Aye. – Thank you, movement passes unanimously. – Thank you, that finishes
our regular agenda. We do have a one pretty scheduled item on the Live Oak Vehicle Parking Program. We will do this quarter to 12. We will enter into shut session at midday. So if we would certainly do that, Area council, if we go immediately and go at twelve noon, that'' s gon na give us sufficient time to come back at 1:30?- Yes, supervisor
. -Okay. We will certainly enter into closed session. We just recessed to shut session and come back at twelve noon and then come back for the general public hearing on the auto parking program for the Live Oak Car Parking Program at 1:30. – Mister Chair, exists anything reportable on county council coming out of closed session? – Forgive me, yes.
– Thanks, there'' s nothing reportable appearing of shut section. – Thanks.
– Thank you. Live Oak Car Parking Program. – All right, thank you and good afternoon, Chair McPherson and supervisors.
Our purpose is to operate a program that offers all stakeholders in the most well balanced means.
Public functions organized
two 2 meetings, February 3rd and February 17th.
We ' ve likewise uploaded our draft budget detail for this program.This info has been uploaded for more than a month and has been the subject of much dispute. Additionally, District-1 supervisor and personnel have done extensive outreach, consisting of routine community meetings and considerable ballot to better understand the needs of our area. This is a very substantial program, whether the program continues or otherwise. I ' m gon na maintain my comments inform to enable even more time for a robust discussion. The advised actions prior to you today are to accept and submit the 2020 Live Oak Auto parking Program report to take on resolutions developing the assigned vehicle parking area, including the duration of restricted car park and costs for the 21 Live Oak Vehicle Parking Program. To consider modification to auto parking charge amounts. And to route the division of public jobs to launch the 2021 Live Oak Car Parking Program.
I am readily available to answer any questions or offer any kind of added details that you desire.
– Thank you.
And I actually wan na applaud them for that. I assume, you understand, a whole lot of individuals might question, you recognize, personnel
' s motives intentions my own very own in trying attempting move'this program forward. You understand, I simply wan na share.
So thank you. And then to develop on what. Supervisor Machado claimed, you know, as I said, we co-hosted two public. workshops together.In enhancement, I have held numerous. city center conferences myself. I invested a few hours at the. Live Oak Farmer ' s Market in which it was essentially a marathon of public engagement standing for 3 and a fifty percent hours directly, heard from a great deal of components there. I ' ve reviewed the changes to this car park program with the suggested. changes on a regional podcast.We ' ve reviewed hundreds. and hundreds of constituent emails with my office. And then in an initiative to be as unbiased as possible.
I produced a study, both through
my'social.
media and e-mail e-newsletter, to collect even more info from the area at big. My newsletter circulation. listing is over 25,000 recipients. It is a big number. of people both largely in the first district yet. throughout the county as well.We obtained over 980. responses to that study.
And you recognize, I tried to actually make. You know, the outcomes were really divided. I indicate, you understand, while it wasn ' t. statistically depictive in terms of an arbitrary sample of people, as I stated, a whole lot of, you know, over 25,000 individuals were given the opportunity to take the survey.
study to see if altering the cost at which the program was used would develop any kind of even more support for it and ask people who had originally said that the program. should be gotten rid of, or they weren ' t sure if they would certainly support the program at a$ 50 a season pass, and that boosted support for the program to about 56% of all respondents.So that ' s just the added information I wan na provide the board on some of the background work. that my office has done. And afterwards I desired to ask a couple of questions and
particularly I desired. to highlight the elephant in the room, which is the Coastal Commission Letter we obtained yesterday claiming that they do not support any kind of changes or development of the Live Oak Car parking program. As the board is probably mindful, this program has a. coastal development license to permit it to operate. I ' ll just go in advance and.
in fact read a paragraph from that letter, which I think is most likely. most to the point.And I estimate, “We do not support. operation of the program irregular with the underlying Coastal Advancement Authorization, CDP.
And we do not sustain making. changes to it as you are, our board are presently being
asked to do without a
proper CDP change application and allure procedure. Please know that ongoing operation of the program irregular. with the underlying CDP, whether it is customized as.
it ' s being advised, or it remains the like recently, represents an understanding and. deliberate violation of the CDP, the Coastal Act and the. local seaside program.To which the Coastal Act.
consists of a collection of treatments including, management penalties, and various other fines to.
correct both past violations, along with brand-new and possible infractions.
Any modifications to the.
It ' s bothering to get a letter that directed from the Coastal. The county has actually consented to the Coastal Compensation ' s territory, otherwise we would certainly not have. And the penalties for violation, if they ' re found can be significant.
-Thank you. And I will certainly'likewise just point out, we did obtain this letter yesterday after we have been involved working with the Coastal Payment.
actually because the start of taking a look at updating this process.So, that ' s part of why we ' re right here today and attempting to consider this. proof at this moment. An additional concern for you, Mister Health, if we didn ' t operate a. auto parking program this year, and there was, you know, we ' ve you recognize, had a truly difficult summertime and there were strong'demand from the public for a vehicle parking.
Could we select up where we left off with the formerly accepted and I presume still active seaside advancement permit, and try and, you recognize, come into positioning. -Yeah, I believe that the.
What I would wan na do is go back and look at that license and see
exactly precisely was permitted allowed. the time and after that have an even more complete discussion. with coastal about their claims that the way that the program has broadened over the years does not meet. with their expectations.- Okay, And After That for Supervisor Machado, I ' m attempting to, you understand, you could have an extra complete understanding of what especially. the Coastal Payment is taking concern with. You recognize, if we did something like get rid of the satisfaction factor area from the Live Oak Parking Program area, keep the existing kiosks, '
reason I assume that ' s. viewed as maybe accessibility concern or remain within the I think the original operating gates where we ' ll be, where Might 1st to Labor Day, you recognize, if we preserve those adjustments I imply, do you see us being able to do that and have a successful program that we ran in the 2021 season?- So I believe the concerns, 'you understand, I imply, beyond what
they. claimed in the letter is that, they truly just recognize. the original 1983 authorization. And there were a'handful of amendments in the nineties and perhaps. even right into both thousands that expanded the program. that they put on ' t recognize.And so, I presume to answer your concern, you recognize, to be in compliance, we ' d need to at a minimum scale back the location to the initial 83 area, which is a handful of streets. less than what we have today.
One of the other issues that they continue to push. Some people get charged. I believe those are the big issues, you recognize, I mean, there ' s smaller sized issues that.
For us to have actually a. economically sensible program, we are in that$ 75, that ' s the amount.That ' s what it takes. That ' s what it takes to run the program. And I don ' t know exactly how to.
places us in a deficit mode, specifically if we downsize the area. After that allow sales will go down.Costs won ' t go down that much. You still have to have enforcement, you still need to have. management of the program, you still need to have. those systems in position, therefore, you know, it'may really worsen for us, if we attempt to meet their demands, the price might nearly go up and I assume that ' s as opposed to what they think is right. for the community as a whole. -[ Bruce]
Of all, thank you, Supervisor Coonerty and Mister Machado for your outreach efforts I ' m certain your constituents, appreciate it as well.
I wear ' t understand, just looking. at it from the beyond the area and, I ' m terrified if we just go on. with the proposition right now, we ' re gon na get a great deal of pushback, I don '
t recognize that much is gon na be gotten if we have more conversations with the Coastal Payment, and I recognize there were most likely a lot of people waiting. to make comments currently, but, personally I ' d hesitate from deciding at this point.
I ' m just reluctant to go in advance and approve something at this point, knowing, or having quite excellent evidence that the Coastal Commission ' s. not going to accept it. I put on ' t know if any various other board members have a remark to make on it? I suggest, there ' s a number of.
you might have Supervisor Good friend.-'Thanks, therefore. thank you Mister Chair. And I in fact, I wished to start, with an admiration of Supervisor Koenig as well as Director Machado.
because this has been, you recognize, an intractable.
problem for some time and it really hasn ' t had the activity and so I appreciate your management on, trying to reach this as a. resolution particularly as a new area manager. And to Supervisor Machado, you recognize if some of the e-mails that I ' d received and outreach had actually received( Friend. laughs )are any kind of indication, I simply wan na claim, you know that to a factor. that Manager Koenig
was suggesting to, several of them were sort of individual, and I really felt were unsuitable, and questioned, intentions and ethics that. I actually believe crossed the line so I want you to know that the board completely supports you, completely sustains your department, and I ' d like to advise the community, that his job and his division ' s work is to execute our plans. If you have an. issue with the policies, that ' s what we ' re right here for.I did wan na speak a little. bit about the program however, ' cause I do have, there are some problems. with it I assume that could actually be a bit irreconcilable, that as well, one fast sec, I ' m having some'audio here. I believe I got it, to. supervisor McPherson ' s point, I indicate, seaside has really been engaged for rather some time on this problem they ' ve spoken with the.
board formerly concerning it, they ' ve expressed their concerns about it, I understand the letter did come in a little last. min yet the viewpoints that they ' ve been sharing. have been pretty consistent. Ultimately they don'' t like the program, I suggest, they have worries concerning, the equity problems, they have worries regarding the prices and those aren
' t gon na be'remedied by any one of the proposals that. remain in front people today, and I think that there were.
some quite hard issues with it as'well, I suggest, I would say that, various other districts are. subsidizing the program because the program isn ' t self maintaining, that it develops impacts beyond the Live Oak parking lot, because, individuals will certainly most likely to locations that put on ' t expense
anything to park, so it produces effects.
on Supervisor Coonerty, and my areas and various other locations of Manager Koenig area, there ' s higher just questions about equity and gain access to'to the shore, and whether it ' s sensible, for instance, to bill my constituents who access locations of Live Oak to accessibility. the coastline off fee however, you
understand, Manager Koenig components or Supervisor Coonerty ' s constituents can boil down to my area to not involve in the charge to likewise access the coast.So there ' s an injustice throughout the line there of whether that ' s practical. So I think that these are.
actually difference of opinions if we have. a program functionally, a minimum of under its existing construct. And I assume that possibly one. of the easiest things to do, is to actually, junk the program as
currently developed, and begin a brand-new, and see whether we can design something that does in fact job. If we were making, because. this program from scrape, we wouldn ' t design it to look the manner in which it currently looks. I indicate, you would develop a program that A, is self-sustaining. I mean that is a. affordable initial pillar. You ' d layout a program that areas and honors accessibility to the coast for all people despite earnings, you wouldn ' t have a regressive citation rate policy that generally the citations are a lot more expensive than. the authorizations as recommended. You'would certainly work with some. of the advancements as we have in all of our. districts in the coastal zone that require to be dealt with, and in my area as well.And I assume that possibly. simply based on the input that we ' ve received. leading up to this factor, that, with the substantial. quantity of pushback for what
truly is a. sensible ask of cost
, in my opinion, that. perhaps it ' s impossible to, reach a factor of
concession on this, however for beginning again a new,'and for that issue$ 75. is simply a price recuperation it ' s not actually also the amount of cash that would be
needed to. run a robust program. The numbers originally. that I remember listening to from some of the very early. neighborhood outreach was maybe, $100 to boost some of.
the demands that individuals have, and I believe that there would certainly. If the board were to approve a program that had an increase in expense that didn ' t actually truly provide an, be a great deal of disappointment.
in the advised actions or under the existing constructs of the program that. really meets those requirements.
You understand, if we did something like remove the pleasure factor area from the Live Oak Auto parking Program area, preserve the existing stands, '
reason I think that ' s. seen as possibly accessibility concern or stay within the I believe the original operating entrances where we ' ll be, where May 1st to Labor Day, you recognize, if we keep those modifications I imply, do you see us being able to do that and have a successful program that we ran in the 2021 season? For us to have actually a. economically sensible program, we are in that$ 75, that ' s the amount.That ' s what it takes. I ' m just hesitant to go ahead and approve something at this factor, recognizing, or having pretty great evidence that the Coastal Compensation ' s. not going to accept it. I truly think went across the line so I desire you to know that the board totally sustains you, completely sustains your department, and I ' d like to advise the community, that his job and his department ' s work is to apply our policies. You ' d style a program that areas and honors accessibility to the coast for all people regardless of incomes, you wouldn ' t have a regressive citation rate policy that generally the citations are much more expensive than.So I assume that, I would in fact be
encouraging of beginning a brand-new, and I assume that, there is a way to construct a new program with coastal at the table, that actually fulfills the
demands of both the neighbors, doesn'' t impact the various other areas similarly, addresses the equity
Under what'' s proposed,'I don ' t think that ' s the instance. Thank you Mister Chair.
Excellent. Any kind of various other remarks from. Manager Coonerty?- Sure, thank you, Mister Chair.
I wan na just outline a. little of my preliminary comments and I look forward
. to learning through the area. Initially I wan na say thanks to Supervisor Machado for his work in trying.
to think this with, and reveal my admiration and compassions for Manager Koenig.
who has actually walked into this, really very difficult concern and.
I assume has actually approached it, with an actual openness, and a need to hear and.
Supervisor Good friend has detailed, I
fundamentally disagree. There are several.
I comprehend the aggravation. of the neighbors, I live about 4 blocks. from Westbrook Drive, and
there is no license. auto parking admitted the City of Santa Cruz near the shore and so every weekend break and summer season, there are no garage on the road in front of my home, yet that ' s part of the rate I spend for. being lucky adequate to live this near to the shore and I ' m desiring the remainder of California to be able to have an access to the shore and not have costs be a barrier.The second piece of it is. it does affect other members of my constituency and. that because Live Oak has a permit and a price program, that does press individuals. into the Seabright area where there is no license or cost program and truthfully where the coastline compensation wouldn ' t enable a program. like that to exist. It does then, you understand, create a lot more.
effects in the neighborhood. I assume seaside is rather.
There ' s the increasing our initiatives via the. I ' ve always had deep
concerns, with the inequitable, un-equitable nature of this program, and I look forward ahead hopefully going and ideally this program.
– Thank you, any kind of various other.
Caput]
Well, the just … My video clip is switched off by the host, perhaps I can obtain the. video back I put on ' t recognize. This is Greg, -Yeah, right, we can hear you.- Currently we ' re okay. Yeah I didn ' t have any video clip, what a mess! I'put on ' t also understand what the. set recommendation is currently. I ' m willing to back up Manager Koenig ' create you ' re the one. who stands for that 'location, so are we recommending
that we simply ditch the entire point or are we recommending that we ' re gon na try to fix this? It ' s a challenging one so, anyway. – Well, I don'' t recognize if. we ' ve learnt through our counsel, I wear ' t know that we, well we can come to a choice if we desire, however I wear ' t understand if that would certainly appertain. Allow me ask advice what it would be, do you feel that we could. make some improvements in attempting to, or to ask Supervisor Koenig to speak with the Coastal Payment to, possibly put out some general concepts of what we needed to come or fix up with a new program of types. that they may accept or, I'' m simply trying to get. a sense of how we can, you understand, what instructions.
we can require to reach some sort of a resolution to this, '' cause it'doesn ' t show up. that it ' s gon na be able'to stand as proposed, which ' s not to the mistake of anybody, what would be your ideas, Mister Guidance, Mister Heath
? -Well thank you.I was particularly taken by.
Mister Machado'' s remarks that he did not think that returning in contact with seaside at this moment was going.
to solve a concern, if your board had an interest in continuing along those lines, I would of training course enjoy to take part in any kind of conversations, yet I wan na take Mister Machado and team'' s lead since they ' ve been having those conversations. with them for a lengthy time. I think that the concept of scrapping the program totally right now, I would certainly simply warn that I wear'' t believe that that ' s been rather observed under the Brown Act and that an activity to scrap.
the program on this agenda, might be a little dangerous since.
there may be lots of people that would certainly appear to.
remark if they understood that that was on the agenda. There'' s a selection of. points that your board can do today with this, one would be to simply deny a section of the staff proposition to take on the resolutions and progress with the program today.
and team could come back in a number of weeks if personnel felt it was ideal with a brand-new program, or they could extract from your board'' s instructions that your. board was not thinking about applying the program this year, and come back in following.
May after they'' ve done, I claim May of 2022 with a brand-new proposition, to either go back to the.
fundamental of the 1983 authorization, or to see whether or not.
we can get to contract with coastal or a selection of other points.
– Okay. Manager Coonerty, do you have any recommendation.
I will open up the general public, I'' m sure you ' ve made a remarkable outreach to the general public and I'' m. sure there ' s lots of people who ' d like to talk on this, if we most likely to their and I'' m up to do that, I would certainly'such as to just ask people that I ' m certain they have the very same remark, and we'' ve gotten the same. letters for all board members on what the sensations are, and it ' s quite divided as', Manager Koenig said.So I ' m simply, if we ' re. not mosting likely to come to a. -Manager, another factor, I simply wanted to make to be clear is that, the board might embrace an activity
to find back on the next agenda or the following program after. that with an ordinance to repeal the county
. If the board, code area that regulates this program. was interested in doing that, and team would restore, a statute to rescind the Live. Oak Parking License program that would certainly enable you the capability to begin again once more as manager Buddy and Manager Coonerty were stating, however, if we did repeal the program, my belief is that that.
license would certainly in fact pass away with our repeal of the program you can not depend upon.
that original 1983 license, remaining to move forward right into the future so it would really be a complete do-over.
I simply desired to add.
that into the discussion. – Okay. Anyone wan na make any type of comments or I assume I'' ll
ask. for the public to participate, any kind of remarks from the.
– I'' ll include simply a little
. I think that simply in my discussions with seaside and coastals over the last 8 or 9 years, with coastal'' s letter. The only means this is gon na job is by revamping the program and not trying to adapt within the narrow 83 boundaries that put on'' t satisfy the demands of the area, don ' t satisfy the requirements of
a. fundable program for public worksJobs and probably possibly additionally'' t meet satisfy needs requirements regards to equity.
and gain access to but I appreciate that that'' s additionally an existing authorization to ensure that is what that is but, once more if we were reconstructing.
this program from the ground up, which has become part of the discussion about whether in other locations of the county we could create similar programs, we wouldn'' t layout it such as this, we would certainly create it in different ways so I think from a public.
plan perspective, I don'' t think it makes good sense to modify and attempt something that isn'' t fixable when we have an opportunity to start a new recognizing.
that'' s a hefty lift, but recognizing that we require our seaside companions at the table in order to develop a sustainable.
program moving on so, I comprehend the lawful recommendations on this and I would certainly recognize that part of it, I imply I feel like it in fact truly has been individuals are aware of that today that could be a discussion point, but regardless of that, I would certainly still think that the direction ought to be for that relocating ahead to start this program a new regardless.
of when that timing is.
– Okay. I assume there'' s basic consensus on the board from what I'' ve listened to in the remarks to.
address it in that manner. I do think I'' ll open it as much as the general public. They have a feeling of.
what we could be doing or it could be compelled to you fundamentally. So I will open the general public. Do we have a whole lot of people.
Presently.
have 2, three people. – Okay, excellent. Let'' s open it approximately the public then,- [Cabrera] Certain, customer 2915, your microphone will be unmuted.- [Becky] Hi, this is Becky Steinbruner from country Aptos can you hear me? – Yes.
– Yes. – [Becky] Thank you. I simply intend to bring.
right into this discussion additionally how this would certainly interface with the Opal Cliffs Recreation.
District where individuals are paying and they are.
restricting access to the beach. Money from this broadened program has actually been claimed it would certainly go.
to improve exclusive coastline, this beach that the Opal Cliff Entertainment Area maintain. So this needs to be on the table too. I am troubled that Director Machado has actually currently applied with.
the preparation department for a license to increase this program throughout the county. I wan na thank the Coastal.
Commission for being extremely clear, and part of this letter.
that has not been checked out is that they are totally.
against car parking fees in all. On web page two, it states, “” It is not clear that any.
appropriate version of the program, would certainly be able to create enough earnings, to both pay for itself, and systematically enhance, public vehicle parking and public.
access going ahead, which is explained as.
a goal of a potentially modified program.We consequently professionally suggest that it is time for the area. to take into consideration whether or not”, I
' m sorry, my display went off, “Continuing to operate the program makes “economic feeling, is in the public ' s ideal passion, and can be located Coastal. Act and LCP consistent.
In our sight, the answer to. each of these concerns is no,
and we think that the. program should be ceased.
This has actually been our consistent. placement concerning the program for decades. And we have actually shared this. setting continuously with county staff throughout the years. And any representations to the contrary ought to be disregarded. We do not support the Live. Oak allow car park program”.- [
Cabrera] Robert M, your. microphone is unmuted.
Robert M?- Hello there board. Yes, great afternoon. -[ Cabrera] Great mid-day. – [Robert] I'' ve lived in.
the Live Oak car park authorization location for three decades and I wan na highlight to the board that the.
program has actually achieved success in improving our quality of life for those people who live.
on these very busy roads near the beach. I recognize that the program goes for a deficit and I'' m. hopeful that the board can locate some method to make.
the program pay for itself, that stated, and paying attention.
to both the conferences provided by the.
division of public jobs and having checked out all.
the remarks that this board has obtained, and additionally going through the letter of the Coastal Payment.
that was gotten yesterday, we'' re confronted with an intractable problem.I believe the
previous audio speaker noted that the Coastal Compensation is never gon na appear and claim that there is an acceptable auto parking program. That'' s extremely unfortunate and as I said, it has a direct effect.
on the lifestyle in our neighborhoods. My suggestion is that the.
board would proceed with, a modified proposal that would go back to the 1983 authorization and look for.
a means to make the program, pay for itself. I really can'' t emphasize highly sufficient the benefits that the car park program has. That stated, I assume that if you search in other seaside territories.
throughout California, and I did some research study, there are other areas.
with permitted auto parking. While it may run a foul of.
what the Coastal Payment would love to see, we understand that there traditionally.
are permitted areas, in other areas. Please take that right into.
factor to consider and, as I state, I wish you can go back to.
Joe Hall, your.
Thank you board, and I'' d like to resemble the.
remarks of the last speaker, generally, we live next.
to a major destination, and we have very little enforcement, other than the car park program.They are our UN
peacekeepers. If we unilaterally dropped this program, we will certainly finish up starting vehicle parking wars, which we had in the past. Truly can'' t claim way too much extra, yet I appreciate the time.
you'' re taking into this, and I value the 30 years of tranquility, this program has actually gotten, to both the site visitors and the citizens of the Live Oak area. Thanks so a lot and best of luck attempting to discover a middle roadway.
that works and can proceed. Otherwise, I would say, keep the program as initially permitted, and we'' ll job from there. Thank you. – [Cabrera] Trudy Vanal, your.
microphone has actually been unmuted. – [Trudy] Hi, Can you hear me? – [Cabrera] Yes. – [Trudy] Okay, I'' m simply concerned, I ' m not against the.
program as it currently is, I'' m worried concerning the charges that were recommended and bringing that increasingly more to the locals. I assume it'' s absurd that we would certainly have to pay $100 $75 or currently.
what'' s being believed of as $ 50 to park
in front of my house.However, I comprehend, the auto parking program. does have its advantages. I would highly desire to recognize I presume, the problem of why this.
has actually been in the shortage and run in the shortage, and after that the suggested moving out becoming such an earnings for the area. And after that having it not be rearranged to the parking program, yet after that right into various other funds.I hunch basic funds and. after that it designated in an outward direction. So I ' m not against it totally, but I truly believe we ' re. leaping too fast on this
, and my ballot right currently. would be to try to keep the Coastal Commission permit, since if we close that now, I assume we ' re gon na have. a tough time reopening it or something
else, but, it ' s not functioning'the way it is or what is forecasted to be, you recognize, to cover expenses. I assume we just require to take a go back and re-look at this.
Thank you. There'' re no, I ' m sorry, audio speaker B, your microphone is unmuted. Hi, my name is Costs, 25 year homeowner in Live Oak, near Sunny Cove, and have to state normally.
authorize of the program, over these years, we have staircases leading down.
to the beach on our road, so it'' s an incredibly high website traffic location, especially when there'' s great. weather condition and in the summertime.We would have problems if. the program were to disappear, regarding just how things would certainly be imposed, like it ' s continuously. happened for many years, with people
obstructing our driveway, or you understand campers and. vans overnight vehicle parking on the other side of the road, We ' ve valued the reality that two resident parking. licenses are complimentary annually, yet, we kind of have actually challenged needing to spend for 2 visitor permits. I guess our feeling would be, maybe increase the day allow rate for individuals that are seeing and homeowners not need to pay for a. number of guest permits, but, just an assumed on that particular. however it ' s also hard to recognize, not having drilled down on the economics and the specific line item,
revenue sources and shortages to know if that could aid. obtain the program to damage even.Thank you.- [Cabrera] Laurie Otto, your. microphone has been unmuted.
Hi, I ' m Laurie Otto, I live outside of the.
And I assume the program in existence,'while it didn ' t make cash and shed cash, it ought to stay basically. Correct time has due to the fact that. not been invested by any person, resident input has not been. allowed up until February. And, we had an entire year. to talk concerning this program that individuals are extremely enthusiastic regarding and an entire year must be sufficient time to really put with each other an excellent program that every person can be happy with and rely on making use of in the future. Thanks board, I value your time. -[ Cabrera] There are nothing else. speakers to this item chair. -[ Bruce] Okay, returning. to the board for discussion, I recognize there ' s a worry. that if we just attempt to reactivate a brand-new, if we
lose. it it ' ll never ever come back, but I assume we ' re not.
in an offending setting so to talk at this moment in trying to'continue to implement it as is under the Coastal.
Commission ' s ideas, that the solid tips that they have actually made and continuously. made over the years.I put on '
t know if anyone wants to, that could wan na make a movement. or at this moment or is.
– Chair.
– Mister Chair I ' ll attempt to, oh I say sorry Supervisor Koenig please. -Sure, so I ' d move, not to
move onward with.'the Live Oak car parking program in the 2021 period, but additionally not to always. take straight activities to eliminate the existing program. And the reason being, I assume that I comprehend.
Coastal ' s arguments and the disagreements of my coworkers around the huge injustice problem, you understand but there ' s no complimentary launch and if we produce free parking. for people in the area, people will pay in their. time seeking parking. And I believe that a whole lot of homeowners, will simply react to the elimination of the program by car parking in front of their house or on the road and thus eliminating. parking for the general public. Therefore, I assume that we should, I don ' t see any type of reason to get rid of that backup setting of re-approaching the car parking program in the future under the authorization that ' s been created we understand that seaside doesn ' t. like paid parking programs however the City of Santa Cruz makes you park if you ' re. car park by the boardwalk, City of Capitola makes you park if you ' re auto parking. in downtown Capitola, and I indicate my understanding is that those programs exist due to the fact that they ' ve been kind of grandfathered in.And so'I would hate to eliminate the capability to develop a program. that ' s ultimately you recognize', ideal for everybody based upon.
that pre-existing license. So again, I ' d transfer to not to move on to Live'Oak vehicle parking. program in the 2021 period, yet to retain the
option for the future. -Manager'Koenig prior to I second it let me see reason I ' m helpful of that but allow me see if I can verbalize what I was believing a movement on this would certainly be. There ' s four advised activities, and I think that we need. to accept number one, which is just that an exemption of this report or turn down.'2, three, and 4, which would certainly include the.
implementation of this program, a price structure, et cetera.
However I assume there requires. to be added instructions to Director Machado and area council to meet the Coastal Payment to find back in 6 months to see if there ' s a program that ' s viable and in agreement for everybody, ' reason that ' ll give them sufficient time to execute it for following year, and if not,'I ' d like to, I think that there ought to 'be language'or notice during that time that removal would certainly get on the table then', yet so to me, I ' m not gon na second the activity yet, yet I desired to see ' trigger your emotion only just talks concerning that a person component, and I wan na see if you. would certainly consider those to be sensible as things. to consist of in a movement, which is just number one, yet not 2, 3, and four, have a six month variable, where they have to return and after that we actually can see if this. can be continual or not. -Yeah, I accept that. as a pleasant change.- Okay so I ' m gon na. to second the movement and afterwards I ' ll make the modification.
I apologize to the staff. that this is an activity for products two, three, and four, or excuse me as a movement for'item one or denial of 2, 3, and four.
Under what'' s suggested,'I wear ' t think that ' s the instance. I ' m prepared to back up Manager Koenig ' cause you ' re the one. I ' m not versus it completely, but I actually believe we ' re. There'' re no, I ' m sorry, speaker B, your microphone is unmuted. And so, I assume that we should, I don ' t see any factor to remove that back-up setting of re-approaching the car parking program in the future under the license that ' s been created we recognize that coastal doesn ' t. like paid vehicle parking programs but the City of Santa Cruz makes you park if you ' re.It'' s reasonable. We have a motion and a second is there any kind of other comment?- Supervisor Coonerty, did you have added instructions you desired to include to the activity?
something on guides, so it'' s simply an issue of personnel you understand, checking out that opportunity so, it can be part of the motion or can'' t, however I think it ought to be, the conversation ought to be in the mix, a strategy must remain in the mix. – I totally agree with
. you Supervisor Coonerty, that'' s an important component, I'' ve seen a lot of encouragement.
in the general public today, a great deal of people believe.
there'' re no indicators when actually there'' s public parking lot. A great deal of individuals paving the whole front of their whole frontage and treating all of it as exclusive auto parking. And so I would likewise like to see some enforcement and.
recovering of that public room as public space. I'' m either delighted to add onto the movement.
if that'' s ideal provided the Brown Act in today'' s thing, or you recognize, perhaps if we'' re all okay as this program is developing.
currently with team, it'' s not redefined however the.
extremely the very least I would most definitely accept that, that'' s an essential thing to consider.
– Mister Machado would certainly you choose, I know Mister Gaffney is.
likewise someplace on here but would certainly you choose to have that as added.
– Yeah I don'' t believe we. Parks has actually been doing a whole lot of terrific job and we can tip that up and then we can even make it a part of the conversation with seaside, which has been a hot topic.
with them also so, it lines up with every little thing we'' re doing.We will just place added power right into that part and.
so just we wear'' t need to make a part of the motion from my point of view we can act forward. – Okay, can I make, Mister Machado this, if we do not execute this program, this is no charge to you.
or a county loss after that, is that correct? I suggest, we'' re not losing cash in this, what we'' re gon na be.
doing, is that appropriate? – That is correct, and so if the program.
does not move forward, we put on'' t spend money on it', we'' ve currently have, you know, we ' ve believed this via, we understand this is a difficult discussion and decision to make and the resources we do have actually committed to the program can be reassigned to various other responsibilities and so there'' s no loss, I think you recognize, we can progress as the board wants without any kind of added effects in terms of region.
– Very good, thank you. Okay, we have a movement, a 2nd concept.
the activity is amended. Okay, please call the roll. – Manager Koenig, – [Koenig] Aye. – Friend? – Aye. – [Cabrera] Coonerty. – Aye. – Caput? – [Caput] Aye. – McPherson? – Aye. – [Cabrera] Thank you,.
activity passes as changed. – Thank you. Okay, that concludes.
our meeting for today, our next conference of the.
region board of supervisors will certainly be on April, 2 weeks from currently on.
April 27th, at 9:00 am. Thanks for a good conversation, and this meeting is adjourned.
It'' s practical. We have a movement and a second is there any various other remark?- Supervisor Coonerty, did you have extra instructions you wanted to include to the motion? – Yeah I wear'' t assume we. Okay, we have an activity, a 2nd idea.