> >> > EXCELLENT MID-DAY. WELCOME TO THE DURHAM PLANNING PAYMENT. THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE DURHAM PLANNING COMMISSION HAS BEEN SELECTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE CHOSEN AUTHORITIES HAVE THE FINAL SAY ON ANY ISSUES PRIOR TO United States TONIGHT. , if YOU WANTED TO TALK TO AN SCHEDULE PRODUCT PLEASE GO TO THE TABLE TO MY LEFT AND INDICATION UP TO TALK.. FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF AN ITEM PLEASE SPEAK YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS CLEARLY RIGHT INTO THE MICROPHONE. EACH SIDE, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF AN THING AND THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK AGAINST AN PRODUCT WILL HAVE 10 MINS. TIME WILL BE DIVIDED AMONGST ALL PEOPLE PREFERRING TO SPEAK. A PROTEST PETITION CONTAINER BE VERY HANDY TO THOSE CITIZENS RESIDING IN THE REZONINGARY. PLEASE SPEAK WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TEAM FOR ANY INFORMATION ON A DEMONSTRATION REQUEST AND THEY WILL CERTAINLY ENJOY TO ASSIST YOU. WHEN YOUR INSTANCE WILL GO FOR A FINAL BALLOT, you SHOULD ADDITIONALLY MAINTAIN IN CONTINUOUS TOUCH WITH THE PREPARING DIVISION AS FOR. IN An ACTIVITY FAILS OR CONNECTIONS, THE REFERRAL IS FOR REJECTION. ROLL TELEPHONE CALL.
(ROLL CALLED). >> > > WE HAVE ANY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE MINS? >> > > GOOD NIGHT, CHAIR JONES AND MEMBERS OF THE COMPENSATION, PAT YOUTHFUL WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. WE DO HAVE 2 REQUESTED ADJUSTMENTS, THE FIRST IS THAT WE RELOCATION 8 A, RESOLUTION IN HONOR OF TEIJI KIMBALL TO INSTANTLY AFTER THE MODIFICATIONS TO HONOR MR. KIM BELL AND ALSO DEMAND THE ENHANCEMENT OF ITEM WHAT WOULD BECOME 8C, WHICH WOULD BE A RESOLUTION IN ASSISTANCE OF AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE ASKED FOR BY COMMISSIONER WINDERS. >> > > THANKS. APPROVAL OF THE MINS? >> > > YES, SIR >>. > > I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT FUNDING FOR THE INTENDING DIVISION. >> > > OK, WE ' LL ADD THAT UNDER NEW COMPANY B >> > > ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. >> > > ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. >> > > SO RELOCATED >>. >> > > SECOND. > > RELOCATED AND EFFECTIVELY SECONDED, ALL IN SUPPORT LET IT BE KNOWN BY RAISING YOUR RIGHT HAND. ANY OPPOSITION? >> > > THE MINUTES BRING 12-0. >> > > ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.AS STATED, WE WILL MOVE THE RESOLUTION HONORS COMMISSIONER TEIJI KIMBALL PRIOR TO WE OPEN THE GENERAL PUBLIC HEARING. I'' LL STROLL DOWN HERE. THIS IS A RESOLUTION IN GRATITUDE OF MR. TEIJI KIMBALL AND REVIEWS WHEREAS MR. TEIJI KIMBALL WAS A PARTICIPANT OF THE DURHAM PLANNING COMMISSION FROM APRIL 2010 THROUGH JUNE 2013 AND WHEREAS THE DURHAM PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DURHAM HAVE BENEFITED FROM THE COMMITTED EFFORTS HE PRESENTED WHILE ACTING AS A MEMBER OF THE DURHAM PREPARATION COMPENSATION AND WHEREAS THE COMMISSION DESIRES TO EXPRESS ITS APPRECIATION FOR THE PUBLIC SERVICE AND WORK WELL DONE, CURRENTLY AS A RESULT BE IT RESOLVED SECTION 1 THAT THIS COMMISSION DOES HEREBY EXPRESS ITS SINCERE RECOGNITION FOR THE SERVICE RENDERED BY MR.KIMBALL AND
TO THE CITIZENS OF THE AREA, AREA 2, THAT THE STAFF OF THE COMPENSATION IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO SPREAD THIS RESOLUTION IN ITS ENTIRETY AMONG THE AUTHORITIES MINUTES OF THIS COMMISSION AND THE RESOLUTION EXISTS TO MR. KIMBALL AS A SYMBOLS OF HIGH ESTEEM HELD FOR HIM EMBRACED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2013, CHAIRMAN, ANTONIO JONES. (APPLAUSE). MR. KIMBALL HAS A COUPLE OF WORDS HE WOULD LOVE TO SAY SO WE CONTAINER GIVE HIM HIS LAST 3 MINS. THANKS. >> > > MANY THANKS, MR. CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PREPARING PAYMENT. I MOST DEFINITELY WON'' T REQUIRED THE 3 MIN TIME, BUT I APPLAUD YOU FOR THE RESOLUTION THAT YOU ARE CONCERNING ALL SET TO DISCUSS, WHICH IS AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND THE REALITY THAT AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE HERE IN DURHAM REQUIRES TO BE AT THE LEADING EDGE OF OUR NEEDS AND HOW WE RESPONSE IT AND WE'' VE GOT TO BE ABLE TO RESPONSE IT EXTERIOR THE BOX. NOT EVERYONE, WHILE YET WE'' RE ADDRESSING IT AROUND THE TRANSPORTATION CENTERS AND THE NEW PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION, THERE IS A TIME IN WHICH AFFORDABLE HOUSING USED TO BE CALLED STARTER HOMES AND STARTER COMMUNITIES.AND THEY WEREN ' T AROUND TRANSPORT HUBS. THEY OCCURRED TO BE OUT IN RURAL AREAS. WE NOW HAVE PEOPLE IN NORTHERN DURHAM THAT LIVE IN HOMES THAT HAVE TO BE HEATED BY TIMBER THEREFORE FOR THAT REASON I ASK THAT YOU OPEN UP UP YOUR IDEA PROCESS TO LOOK A LITTLE LITTLE BIT BEYOND THE WALL SURFACES OF JUST TRANSPORTATION AND CONSIDER HOW WE CONTAINER ADDRESS THIS HUGE THING THAT IS GREATER THAN SIMPLY THE SOCIALLY ECONOMICALLY DISPIRITED, BUT IT IS OUR FIREMEN, OUR POLICEMEN, OUR TEACHERS, THOSE THAT DO EARN MONEY BUT IT IS NOT THAT IN WHICH WE CAN STAY IN THE SOUTHERN COMPONENT OF THE REGION, ALTHOUGH THEY WISH TO. IT IS NOT IN THE URBAN AREA OF THE REGION, ALTHOUGH THEY DON ' T WISH TO, AND IT MAY NOT BE AROUND A TRANSPORTATION HUB THAT IS PROPOSED OR CURRENTLY A BUS ROUTE THAT THEY WOULD LIKE. JUST OPEN UP AND THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX, DESPITE THE FACT THAT I PRAISE EVERY ONE OF YOU FOR THIS RESOLUTION THAT '
S TURNING UP ON AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE. THANKS VERY MUCH.( PRAISE). > > WE ' RE GOING TO NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR STEELS AT SOUTHPOINT II KAISZ 130007 AND ZONING SITUATION Z130020. > > MR. CHAIR, PRIOR TO I TRANSFORM IT OVER TO MR. CAIN FOR YOUR TEAM RECORD, I WANT TO AFFIRM FOR THE RECORD ALL PUBLIC HEARING> THINGS HAVE BEEN ADVERTISED BASE ON THE PROVISIONS OF LEGISLATION AND SWORN STATEMENTS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO THAT EFFECT. > > DARREN CAIN, PLANNING DIVISION. THE INSTANCE BEFORE YOU IS MEADOWS AT SOUTHPOINT, THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION IS FROM WORKPLACE AND COMMERCIAL TO LOW TOOL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. BELOW IS A SHOT OF THE AIRBORNE OF THE WEBSITE, THIS SITE MAY LOOK FAMILIAR TO YOU THERE WAS A RECENT CASE THAT YOU SAW PERHAPS NOT EVEN A YEAR AGO.IN THAT INSTANCE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP CLASSIFICATION WAS ALTERED FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE TO COMMERCIAL FOR A SECTION OF THE SITE. IN MARCH OF 2013 THAT CASE PRECEDED THE CITY BOARD, CITY BOARD APPROVED THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP BUT DID NOT APPROVE THE ZONING ADJUSTMENTS. FOR THAT REASON THE MATTER HAS COME BACK TO MODIFICATION THE ZONING ONCE MORE AND FOR THAT ZONING ADJUSTMENT THEY ARE LOOKING TO MOVE INTO LOW TOOL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. THEIR REASON IS THAT THE PROPOSE ADD ADJUSTMENT IS EVEN MORE COMPATIBLE WITH BORDERING LAND MAKES USE OF AND THE RECOMMENDED LAND USAGE WILL CERTAINLY HAVE A BALANCED INFLUENCE ON COMMUNITIES. THE TEAM HAS FOUND THAT THE REASON FULFILLS OUR STANDARD FOR A JUSTIFICATION WHICH TEAM CONCURS WITH IT. SO PERSONNEL IS REVIEWING IT OVER AGAINST THE 4 CRITERIA FOR STRATEGY AMENDMENTS THAT IT IS REGULAR WITH ADOPTED PREPARES AND POLICIES, THAT THE LAND USAGE WORKS WITH EXISTING AND/OR FUTURE LAND USAGE PATTERNS, THAT THE RECOMMENDED LAND USAGE DOES NOT DEVELOP A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPABT AND THAT THE SITE IS OF APPROPRIATE SIZES AND SHAPE. WE HAVE FIGURED OUT THAT IT FOLLOWS EMBRACED PLANS AND POLICIES PARTICULARLY THOSE ON RESIDENTIAL GROWTH IN THE SUV TIER, WHICH THIS SITUATION IS, ALONG WITH THE ADJOINING PLAN PRIOR TO YOU. WE ALSO FIND IT IS SUITABLE WITH EXISTING LAND USE POLICIES AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THIS WIDER SHOT OF THE LOCATION PRIOR TO YOU THAT THE CHANGE TO LOW TOOL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WILL HAVE WHATEVER BASICALLY SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 54 BE RESIDENTIAL AND THOSE THINGS MORE OF THE NON-RESIDENTIAL NORTH OF 54 AND THE GREATER THICKNESS RIGHT HERE SUPPLIES A PROPER CHANGE FROM THE NON-RESIDENTIAL MAKES USE OF TO THE NOERT AND THE INDUSTRIAL CORNER THERE TO THE LOW THICKNESS RESIDENTIALS TO THE SOUTH. WE HAVE FOUND THERE IS NOT SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT HERE. THERE IS ADEQUATE WATER AND SEWAGE SYSTEM ABILITY TO MANAGE THE SUGGESTED DEVELOPMENT. WHILE WE ARE GETTING TO OUR RESTRICTION ON THE FORECASTED NEED FOR OFFICE, THOSE ESTIMATES DO NOT CONSIDER THE SRP AND DESIGN DISTRICT LOCATIONS, SRP BASICALLY BEING RESEARCH STUDY TRIANGLE PARK WHICH HAPLGDSES A GREAT DEAL OF OUR WORKPLACE NEEDS SO WE FEEL OVERALL INCLUDING EVERY ONE OF THOSE AREAS WE CAN MEET OUR WORKPLACE REQUIRES OVER THE NEXT 25 YEARS.AND ECOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS ARE SUFFICIENTLY CONTROLLED TO UDO, THERE IS ONE DESIRE ON THE WEBSITE BUT IT WILL BE BUFFERED. THE AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 47 ACRES AND IS OF SUFFICIENT SIZES AND SHAPE FOR RESIDENTIAL ADVANCEMENT IN THE SUV TIER, AS A RESULT THE WEBSITE SATISFIES THE 4 STANDARD FOR PLAN AMENDMENTS AND PERSONNEL IS SUGGESTING APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSITION. I ' LL ENJOY TO RESPONSE ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
> > GREAT EVENING, AMY WOLF WITH THE INTENDING DEPARTMENT PRELTING THE ZONING MAP CHANGE CASE RELATED TO THIS SITE. IT IS INSTANCE Z1300020, MEADOWS AT SOUTHPOINT BE II. THE CANDIDATE IS IMMEDIATE COS LAND INVESTMENT AND IS FOR 36.2 ACRES OF INSTITUTIONAL ZONING TO A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AT THE DENSITY OF 4.71 SYSTEMS PER ACRE. THE WEBSITE IS 46.9 ACRES AND THE PROPOSITION IS FOR 1 85 COMMUNITY HOUSES AND THAT IS NOT A COMMITTED HOUSING TYPE.AS MR. CAIN POINTED OUT THE WEBSITE IS IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NC54 HIGHWAY AND BARBIE ROADWAY. AS SHOWN BELOW IT ' S IN THE RURAL RATE WITHIN THE SJB WATERSHED PROTECTION OVERLAY AND A VERY SMALL PORTION OF IT IN THE NORTH EDGE IS MAJOR TRANSPORT CORRIDOR OVERLAY. IT ' S 2 PARCELS WITH A RESIDENTIAL– AMONG THOSE PARCELS IS RESIDENTIALLY DEVELOPED PRESENTLY WITH A SOLITARY FAMILY HOUSE AND EXISTING DRIVEWAY ON BARBIE ROADWAY. THE DEMAND DOES MEET THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INTENDED DEVELOPMENT RESOLUTION DEPTION DISTRICT AS SHOWN RIGHT HERE. THE THICKNESS OF 4.718 UNITS PER ACRE WOULD RETURN A MAXIMUM OF 185 SYSTEMS. THE EXISTING PROBLEMS OF THE WEBSITE AS SHOWN BELOW, IT IS WITH THE EXEMPTION OF THE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES I JUST POINTED OUT THERE IS YOUNG PLANT LIFE FORESTED THROUGH THE REMAINDER OF THE WEBSITE. IT WAS TIMBERED IN 2008 BUT IT HAS GROWN SIGNIFICANTLY EVER SINCE. THERE IS AN PERIODIC STREAM ON THE WEBSITE AS YOU TIN SEE HERE, MR. CAIN STATED THAT. AND THE PROPOSAL FOR THE SITE IS SHOWN HERE. IT DOES INCLUDE A NUMBER OF COMMITMENTS, THERE ARE TWO WEBSITE ACCESSIBILITY POINTS, ONE ON
BARBIE ROAD, 1 ON NC54 HIGHWAY.IT ALSO COMMITS TO A 100 FOOT JOB BORDER BUFFER ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE ALONG WITH THE STRUCTURE ENVELOPE REMAINING TYPICALLY NORTH OF THE STREAM. THERE IS A RIGHT-OF-WAY COMMITMENT ALONG BOTH FRONTAGES OF THE SITE. THE TREE CONSERVATION LOCATION IS COMMITTED AT THE AREA AS SHOWN WITH THE STREAM BARRIER AND THE SOUTHERLY PORTION OF THE WEBSITE, ALONG WITH ALONG THE EASTERN SECTION OF THE EXISTING SOLITARY FAMILY PARCEL. ONCE MORE THERE ' S COMMITMENT SHOWN HERE, ADAGE PERVIOUS SURFACE IS 70 PERCENT, WHICH IS THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED IN THE LANDMARK DEFENSE OVERLAY AND THE TREE CONSERVATION AT 20.1 PERCENT. ALL THE GRAPHICS THAT YOU SEE ARE COMMITTED. THERE ' S A NUMBER OF TEXT COMMITMENTS ALSO INCLUDING STORM WATER CONTROL THERAPY, THE LOTS FOOT PROJECT BORDER BARRIER AS I EXPLAINED ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF THE SITE, COMMITMENT OF FREEWAY WHICH IS TO SUIT LIKEWISE THE 4 FEET OF ADDITIONAL ASPHALT WIDENING FOR A PROPOSED BICYCLE LANE ALONG THOSE FRONTAGES AS WELL AS SOME TRANSIT SERVICES WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BUS PULL-OUT AND CONCRETE PAD AND SHELTER.THERE ' S ADDITIONALLY SOME PROPOSED WEBSITE ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS AS INDICATED RIGHT HERE AS A RECAP AT BOTH ACCESSIBILITIES, ALONG WITH THE COMMITMENT TO DEMAND A STREET CLOSING FOR HUNTSMAN DRIVE WHICH CURRENTLY WOULD REQUIRE A LINK FROM THE SOUTH. NEVERTHELESS, IF THAT ROAD IS CLOSED, NO CONNECTION WOULD BE REQUIRED TO THE SOUTH. THERE ARE SOME STYLE COMMITMENTS CONNECTED WITH THIS REQUEST WHICH PERMITS THE HOUSING TYPE TO BE MULTI FAMILY MEMBERS IF THAT IS THE PREFERRED ITEM. AS MENTIONED HERE, BASICALLY ADDRESS THE ROOFING LINE AND BUILDING MATERIALS. ONCE AGAIN THE DEMAND IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY WHICH REVEALS THE SITE AS OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL. YOU LISTENED TO THE REQUEST TO DEMAND LOW TO
MEDIUM THICKNESS RESIDENTIAL. THE REQUEST DOES SATISFY ALL THE OTHER COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY POLICIES THAT APPLY TO THIS WEBSITE AND STAFF FIGURES OUT THAT NEED TO THE PLAN AMENDMENT BE APPROVED THIS REQUEST WOULD FOLLOW THE COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY AND OTHER RELEVANT PLANS AND STATUTES. I ' M AVAILABLE FOR ANY INQUIRIES. > > THANK YOU. WE HAVE 4 INDIVIDUALS WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM AND NONE AGAINST, SO CAN WE HAVE THOSE 4 INDIVIDUALS COME, MR.BRIAN AND OTHERS, YOU HAVE 10 MINUTES. > > MR. CHAIRMAN, MY NAME IS GEORGE BRIAN AND I WOULD LOVE TO RECOMMEND IF YOU WOULD ALLOW IT THAT AGENTS OF THE CANDIDATE, MR. STANGIO AND MR. SPALDING, SPEAK FIRST. > > YES, THAT ' S FINE. > > THANK YOU EXTREMELY MUCH, GEORGE. MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE PREPARING PAYMENT, MY NAME IS KEN SPALDING AND I STAND FOR THE APPLICANT IN THIS ISSUE. WE REMAIN IN COMPLETE CONCURRENCE WITH WHAT YOUR PREPARATION TEAM HAS ACTUALLY RECOMMENDED WHEN IT COME TO THE PLAN CHANGE AS WELL AS THE REZONING. THIS INSTANCE IS LESS THAN A YEAR OLD BUT WE THINK IT ' S A BETTER SITUATION THAT IS BEFORE YOU CURRENTLY THAN YOU HAD BEFORE. WE IMMEDIATELY MET WITH THE LOCALS AFTER WE WERE UNSUCCESSFUL BEFORE
THE COMMON COUNCIL. >> AFTER THAT WE MET WITH THE RESIDENTS, WE MET WITH STAFF, WE TRIED AHEAD UP WITH BOTH FROM PERSONNEL THE DESIGNER AND THE CITIZENS WHAT WOULD BE THE MOST EFFECTIVE STRATEGY TORE THIS AREA. WE HAD A NUMBER OF >> MEETINGS,'WE FINISHED >> UP BEING ABLE TO HAVE COMPLETE CONCURRENCE, ARRANGEMENT, WITH NOT ONLY THE TEAM THROUGH THEIR CAREFUL RESEARCH BUT ALSO WITH THE DESIGNER AND THE RESIDENTS AND SO WE ARE BELOW THIS EVENING TO SAY THAT WE CERTAINLY HOPE THAT THE PLANNING COMPENSATION WILL LIKEWISE BE ENCOURAGING OF THIS ACTION AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. > > MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE PAYMENT, MY NAME IS GEORGE BRIAN, I LIVE AT 6505 HUNTERS LANE IN DURHAM AND I ' M RIGHT HERE THIS EVENING ON BEHALF OF A NUMBER OF MY NEIGHBORS IN THE HUNTERS WOODS AREA WHICH ADJOINS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.WE WANT TO GIVE THANKS TO THE CANDIDATE FOR RETURNING TO US, FOR PAYING ATTENTION TO United States AND FUNCTIONING WITH US AND UPCOMING FORTH WITH A PROPOSITION THAT WE FEEL IS CONSIDERABLY MUCH BETTER THAN YOUR INITIAL PROPOSAL THAT HE MADE. THIS PROPOSAL WE DO ASSISTANCE. I DO WANT, HOWEVER, TO REFERENCE THAT WHILE WE ASSISTANCE THIS PROPOSAL, WE DO HAVE A PROBLEM ABOUT THE FULL ACCESSIBILITY DRIVEWAY REQUIRED AT BARBIE ROAD. MAKING A LEFT TURN OUT OF THIS GROWTH ON BARBIE ROAD AS A RESULT OF LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCES IS GOING TO BE REALLY UNSAFE. >> OUR TEAM BELIEVE THAT THE RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT TURN ORIGINALLY SUGGESTED BY THE CANDIDATE FOR THAT DRIVEWAY IS A MUCH BETTER WAY TO GO. HOWEVER, WE STILL SUPPORT THIS PROPOSAL. THANK YOU. > > ANYBODY ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK? YES.
> > GOT TO ASCERTAIN. MY NAME IS NANCY CHAPONE, I LIVE AT 1218 LITTLE CREEK ROAD, ALSO IN HUNTERS WOOD AND, NO, I ' M NOT CLOTHED TO BE GOTH, IT ' S JUST THAT THE WEATHER TURNED CHILLY AND THIS WAS ALL I HAD THAT WAS WARM. I WAS ONE OF ONE OF THE MOST SINGING OPPONENTS OF THE INITIAL PLAN AND I AM REALLY DELIGHTED WITH WHAT THESE GENTLEMEN HAVE GENERATE FOR THIS.YEAH, I WOULD MUCH PREFER THAT WE HAD A LITTLE NATURE PARK THERE, THAT THE DEER AND THE FOXES COULD STAY IN, BUT I KNOW THAT ' S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN ON 54 AND I DO THINK THIS IS COMPARABLE TO WE ' RE GOING TO WE and get NEED TO BE REALISTIC. I AM WORRIED CONCERNING THE GAIN ACCESS TO ON BARBIE ROADWAY. I ' M A CYCLIST AND I BIKE BY DOING THIS AND I DO THINK A FULL GAIN ACCESS TO OUT OF THAT DEVELOPMENT ON >> TO BARBIE ROADWAY COULD BE VERY HAZARDOUS. IT ' S POOR SUFFICIENT IN An AUTO. THE VARIOUS OTHER POINT I'SIMPLY LISTENED TO WAS ABOUT THE TREE COVER BEING PRESERVED IN ONLY ONE SMALL SECTIONS OF THE BUFFER AND I REALLY WOULD HOPE THAT IT WAS GOING TO BE PRESERVED IN THE WHOLE BUFFER WHICH JUST MAY BE A DETAIL THAT I MISSED.ANYHOW, I GIVE THANKS TO THESE INDIVIDUALS FOR GENERATING SOMETHING
THAT WHILE IT ' S NOT SOMETHING WE REALLY REALLY REALLY WANT, WE CONTAINER LIVE WITH IT. THANK YOU. > > ANY INDIVIDUAL ELSE WISHING TO TALK ON THIS PRODUCT? IF NOT, WE WILL SHUT THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK PRIOR TO THE COMMISSIONERS. DR. WINDERS. > > I WANT TO BRING UP THE PROBLEM OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING'WITH RESPECT TO THIS GROWTH. I THINK THAT IT IS ON TRANSIT ROUTES ON THE BUS COURSE AND WE HAVE LOTS OF LAND ALREADY, A LOT OF UNITS THAT CAN BE BUILT IN THE EXTENSIVE STRATEGY AND TO PERMIT MORE UNITS TO REZONE POINTS TO RESIDENTIAL ON THE NEED, WE DON ' T REQUIRED MORE LAND FOR MORE– MORE UNITS IN THE– ACCORDING TO THE PROJECTED NEED. HOWEVER, WE DO REQUIREMENT MORE BUDGET FRIENDLY UNITS CURRENTLY. AND I ' VE
BEEN TYPE OF, YOU KNOW, ON MY OWN PERSONAL CAMPAIGN ON THIS OVER SEVERAL SITUATIONS AND I ' VE BEEN DEVELOPING MY WORDS SOME AND TRYING TO OBTAIN SOME NUMBERS ON LIKE WHAT WE ' RE >> TALKING ABOUT. AND I LOOKED IN THE HUD CONSOLIDATED PREPARE FOR 2010 TO 2015 AND DISCOVERED THAT THE INTERPRETATION FOR– OF LOW EARNINGS, WHICH WOULD, COULD LIVE IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING, IS $53,900 FOR A 3-PERSON HOUSEHOLD AND $59,900 FOR A 4-PERSON FAMILY MEMBERS. I MADE SOME ROUGH ESTIMATIONS WITH THIS THING CALLED FINANCIAL INSTITUTION PRICE DOT COM AND IT APPEARS LIKE THE LOW EARNINGS, LOW INCOME FAMILY– ACTUALLY THIS WAS IN THE COMBINED STRATEGY ABOUT RENTAL FEE, THAT A LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLD COULD AFFORD, A 4-PERSON FAMILY THAT WAS MARKED AS LOW REVENUE COULD AFFORD $1498 RENT AND A 3-PERSON FAMILY MEMBERS COULD AFFORD$1348 RENT AND THE MORTGAGE WAS EVEN MORE DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE BUT MY ASSUMPTION HAS TO DO WITH 213 OR 220 WOULD QUALIFY AS AFFORDABLE.I DON ' T KNOW, MY FIGURES MAY BE OFF AND I WOULD LOVE FOR THE STAFF TO DEAL WITH UP SOME FIGURES LIKE THAT SO WE REALLY KNOW. BUT WOULD IT BE SIMPLY REALLY DEFRS MENTIONING TO THE BOTTOM LINE TO COMMIT TO– AND I UNDERSTAND THIS, THE MEANS WE DO MATTERS NOW, WE CONTAINER ' T ASK YOU TO MODIFICATION YOUR DEDICATED COMPONENTS AT THIS POINT, BUT JUST FOR DETAILS GOING ONWARD, IS IT WAY OUT OF LINE, THOSE NUMBERS? > > TOM GEORGE STANZIELLE WITH STEWART.
I SUGGEST IT ' S A GREAT CONCERN AND WE ' VE DISCUSSED THIS ON OTHER PROJECTS. I ' VE PERSONALLY BEEN INVOLVED IN DISCUSSIONS WITH THE INTENDING DEPARTMENT ABOUT HOW WE MIGHT PROCEED WITH INEXPENSIVE REAL ESTATE, YOU UNDERSTAND, GOING ONWARD. ONE POINT I DO WISH TO MENTION, THERE ' S A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF TAX OBLIGATION CREDIT HOUSING IN THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION OF THIS JOB, WHICH INDICATES IT ' S I THINK TAX OBLIGATION CREDIT SCORE REAL ESTATE SUGGESTS THAT IT ' S$100 A MONTH– THESE ARE LEASINGS– LISTED BELOW THE MARKETPLACE RATE OF THE'HOMES. ONE OF THE IMPORTANT THINGS THAT WE YAPPED ABOUT EVEN WITH REGION COMMISSIONERS IN A CONFERENCE REGARDING ECONOMICAL HOUSING WAS THAT IT APPEARS TO BE EVEN MORE POSSIBLE THROUGH LEASINGS AS OPPOSED TO ACQUISITION, HOMES FOR PURCHASE. IN ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION ABOUT NUMBERS, IF A PROJECT LIKE THIS WERE GOING TO SELL An UNIT AT, YOU UNDERSTAND, EVEN IF IT WERE A$ >> 200,000 UNIT, IT ' S PROBABLY GOING TO BE SOMEWHERE IN THE 200 TO 250 RANGE, AN'AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE UNIT HERE IN DURHAM BASED ON DURHAM ' S REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE$130,000. — WHICH MAKES A PROJECT LIKE THIS UNFINANCABLE FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF GETTING, YOU UNDERSTAND, GETTING FUNDING FOR A PROJECT WITH HOMES THAT'ARE GOING TO SELL AT THAT LEVEL AND THEN SOME THAT WOULD HAVE TO OFFER IS AT LOW AS$ 130,000. THIS IS'THINGS THAT WE ' RE FIGHTING. WE ' RE NOT COMBATING IT, BUT WE ' RE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT AS A COMMUNITY IN TERMS OF HOW WE OFFER WITH THIS, YOU UNDERSTAND, THIS DISCREPANCY.WE ' RE TALKING ABOUT VARIOUS ALTERNATIVES FOR THE CITY TAKING PART IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING, TO PUT IT SIMPLY, RATHER THAN SIMPLY THICKNESS CREDITS THAT IT MAY BE OTHER TYPES OF ITEMS THAT THE CITY WOULD JOIN, COSTS AND POINTS LIKE THAT, THAT WOULD MAKE IT ATTRACTIVE FOR DEVELOPERS TO BE ABLE TO CREATE DEVICES AT THAT MUCH OF A DISCREPANCY. IN THIS COMPONENT OF THE AREA ALONG THIS HIGHWAY AT THE COST OF THIS LAND, IT SIMPLY MAKES IT REALLY HARD. > > IF IT WERE, IF WE
WERE SPEAKING ABOUT WORK FORCE HOUSING WHICH WOULD LET YOU GO UP TO, SAY, 220, THAT COULD BE FEASIBLE IN THIS KIND OF DEVELOPMENT? > > YOU UNDERSTAND, ONCE AGAIN, ALL OF IT DEPENDS ON WHAT IT ' S CREATED AT.BUT THE NUMBERS THAT WE ' RE HEARING AND OUR PROGRAMMERS BELOW CAN TALK WITH IT, WE ' RE HEARING THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE SOMEWHERE IN THE 200 TO 250 KIND OF RANGE IN STIPULATIONS OF THE COST OF THESE UNITS. THAT HASN ' T BEEN TOTALLY ESTABLISH THE, IT ' S NOT, WE ' RE NOT THAT FAR ALONG, BUT I ' M JUST WANTING TO MENTION TO YOU THE INCONSISTENCY WHEN YOU CHECK OUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING VERSUS MARKET PRICE REAL ESTATE. > > ANYBODY? YES. > > An INQUIRY FOR MR. SANTIEL > > STAND. > > WHEN YOU ' RE SPEAKING ABOUT$ 130,000 A DEVICE, ARE YOU TALKING REGARDING A SOLITARY FAMILY HOME OR ARE YOU SPEAKING REGARDING A CONDOMINIUM OR–. > > IT WOULDN ' T MATTER. > > IT WOULDN ' T ISSUE? > > IT ' S A FEATURE OF THE– PAT >> COULD PROBABLY DESCRIBE IT A LITTLE BETTER. IT ' S A FUNCTION OF THE TYPICAL REVENUE IN THE DURHAM AREA. > > IF I MIGHT, MR. CHAIR, JUST TO BRING SOME >>, A LITTLE LITTLE BIT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE 201380 PERCENT–
80 PERCENT IS TRADITIONALLY THOUGHT ABOUT LOW MODERATE EARNINGS, AGAIN DEFINING TERMS BELOW IS NECESSARY DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT DOES ADJUSTMENT THE AMOUNTS WE ' RE TALKING ABOUT. FOR A 3-PERSON FAMILY IT ' S 48,750 AND FOR A 4-PERSON IT ' S 54,150. SO THE AVERAGE HOUSING AND ENERGY COST AT 30 PERCENT ON A MONTH-TO-MONTH BASIS WOULD BE REGARDING 1340 OR 1350, SO THAT COULD EITHER BE RENT OR MORTGAGE AND ENERGIES. > > SO WHAT HE ' S STATING IS, I INDICATE, THE AMOUNT THAT SOMEONE COULD PAY >> FOR A DEVICE, >> WHETHER IT >> ' S A CONDO OR A TOWN HOME OR A SINGLE FAMILY MEMBERS HOME, IS A FEATURE OF THE TYPICAL REVENUES AND A CERTAIN PORTION> OF THE TYPICAL EARNINGS. >> AND I WEAR ' T KNOW THAT >> EXACT CALCULATION RIGHT NOW BUT THAT ' S GENERALLY HOW IT ' S DONE. > > I UNDERSTAND THAT. ACTUALLY IT WAS NOT WHAT I WAS OBTAINING AT. > > OKAY. > > IF YOU ARE CREATING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY A LITTLE MORE DENSELY IT WOULD SEEM TO ME, YOU STATED THAT YOU TIN ' T– AS A RESULT OF THE EXPENSES OF LAND YOU TIN ' T DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY IN SUCH A WAY AS TO HAVE AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE? I ' M NOT CERTAIN–. > > WELL, I MEAN, A PIECE OF
PROPERTY HAS A SPECIFIC WORTH. >'> RIGHT. > > IT ' S SOLD AT A SPECIFIC AMOUNT. THERE ' S REACHED BE A CERTAIN ROI AND TO GET THAT RETURN ON FINANCIAL INVESTMENT UNITS HAVE TO BE SOLD AT A SPECIFIC AMOUNT, DETERMINED BY THE NUMBER OF UNITS'THERE ARE. WHEN WE CAME BELOW LAST TIME FOR THIS TASK WE HAD 360-SOME UNITS, WE ' RE NOW TO 185 UNITS. IT ' S A DIFFERENT KIND OF DEVICE, THOSE WERE RENTAL APARTMENTS, THESE ARE AVAILABLE. > > OK, THANK YOU. > > COMMISSIONER GIBBS. > > WELL, I THINK WITH THESE COMMENTS WE CONTAINER SEE WHAT THE TASK IS BEFORE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
> > THANK YOU. > > EXCELLENT NIGHT, AMY WOLF WITH THE INTENDING DEPARTMENT PRELTING THE ZONING MAP ADJUSTMENT INSTANCE LINKED WITH THIS SITE. > > THANK YOU. > > MR. CHAIRMAN, MY NAME IS GEORGE BRIAN AND I WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND IF YOU WOULD ALLOW IT THAT AGENTS OF THE CANDIDATE, MR. STANGIO AND MR. SPALDING, SPEAK. > > A CONCERN FOR MR. SANTIEL > > STAND UP.THERE AREN'' T AS MANY CHOICES ON HOW AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE CAN BE EXECUTED AND FIT TOGETHER WITH ALL THE GROWTH THAT'' S HAPPENING BUT– AND I WOULD LIKE TO WELCOME THOSE THAT WANT TO DISCOVER MORE ABOUT WHAT SEVERAL OF THE FIRST STEPS ARE.ITEM 8C, I UNDERSTAND YOU'' RE GOING TO NEED TO WAIT A WHILE, BUT NOT TOO LONG, BUT WE ' RE GOING TO BE REVIEWING A RESOLUTION THAT DR. WINDERS WILL CERTAINLY BE BRINGING PRIOR TO US AND IT WILL GIVE YOU SOME EVEN MORE UNDERSTANDING ON WHAT– AND IT HAS TO DO WITH TRANSPORTS AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING. BUT IT ALSO HAS GENERAL APPLICATION AND I WASN'' T GOING TO MENTION THIS, BUT– ACTUALLY I ' M GOING TO WAIT UNTIL ITEM 8C TURNS UP BECAUSE THAT ' S An EVEN MORE SUITABLE TIME. I DO HAVE ONE INQUIRY ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION STOP AND SANCTUARIES AND'I SEE THAT ' S ON 54, THAT WILL BE AN AVAILABLE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SHELTER WITH EASILY ACCESSIBLE COURSE OF TRAVEL TO AND FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND WALKWAYS AND ALL THAT? >> >
>> > YES, SIR. >'> THAT WAS MY INQUIRY. I ' M LOOKING AHEAD TO SEEING THE ADVANCEMENT HERE SINCE IT ' S– AND I VALUE YOU DEALING WITH THE CITIZENS. >> THANK YOU. THAT ' S ALL. > > COMMISSIONER BIELEN, CANISTER IS WE HAVE COMMISSIONER BEECHWOOD >> AFTER COMMISSIONER PADGETT. > > IT APPEARS ANY TIME WE TALK ABOUT THESE NEW DEVELOPMENTS TO COME IN EVERYBODY TALKS CONCERNING BUDGET-FRIENDLY REAL ESTATE. I'' D SAY LET ' S PUT THE MODEL AHEAD THAT THE CITY POLITICAL LEADERS HAVE BUT THE CITY POLITICAL LEADERS HAVE NO MODEL. WHAT WE NEED TO GET OUT OF THEM IS A LITTLE LESS DISCUSSION AND A LITTLE EVEN MORE ACTION DUE TO THE FACT THAT WHAT WE DEMAND TO PERFORM IS RELOCATION FORWARD ON WHAT AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE, WE CAN ASK EVERYONE WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO ACCOMPLISH ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING BUT IF WE CAN'' T SPECIFY IT OURSELVES, HOW CAN WE NEED ANY PERSON TO SPEAK ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING? IT'' S TIME NOT TO TAKE A LOOK AT EVERYBODY WHO SHOWS UP HERE AND LAY THE BURDEN ON THEM, WE DEMAND TO PUT THE PROBLEM ON THE CITY BOARD.
THAT'' S WHERE THE BURDEN GOES AND UNTIL THEY NUMBER IT OUT WE CANISTER'' T ANTICIPATE ANYBODY ELSE OUT BELOW TO NUMBER IT OUT. IT'' S JUST THE METHOD IT IS AND IT ' S TIME TO, LIKE I SAID, IT ' S TIME FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO PUT UP OR STOP TALKING. >> THEY DEMAND TO DO SOMETHING. >> > > COMMISSIONER BEECHWOOD. > > FROM MY INTERACTION ON THE JOINT CITY-COUNTY PREPARATION BOARD I'' M PRETTY POSITIVE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HAS A RESPECTABLE IDEA OF WHAT THE DEMAND ARE AND IS LEARNING AND IT TRYING TO LEARN AS HIGH AS THEY CONTAINER ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING, IT'' S MINDFUL IT ' S A PROBLEM THAT ' S GOING TO TAKE SIGNIFICANT PUBLIC FUNDS, THEY ARE GOING TO NEED TO BE VERY INNOVATIVE HOW THEY METHOD THE PRIVATE INDUSTRY IN DEVELOPMENT IN TERMS OF HOW THEY COMPANION WITH THEM TO GET BUDGET FRIENDLY REAL ESTATE SO I ASSUME THEY UNDERSTAND IT'' S A VERY CONSIDERABLE AND CHALLENGING PROBLEM THAT IS GOING TO TAKE A GREAT DEAL OF CREATIVE THINKING AND SOME CHALLENGING CHOICES AND PAINFUL DECISIONS FINANCIALLY.I WITH ALSO LIKE
TO DEAL MY GRATITUDE TO GEORGE DENZEL FOR HIS COLLABORATE WITH THE AREA ON THIS PROJECT. IT ' S GREAT TO'SEE. THANK YOU. >> > > ANY INDIVIDUAL ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK? WE REQUIREMENT A MOTION. >> >'> I ' D LIKE TO MAKE A MOVEMENT TO> APPROVE >>. > > SECOND. > > ALL THOSE– IT ' S BEEN RELOCATED AND CORRECTLY SECONDED. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR LET IT BE KNOWN BY RAISING YOUR RIGHT-HAND MAN. ANY RESISTANCE? CONTAINER WE GET An ACTIVITY ON THE PLAN CHANGE. > > I MAKE A MOTION– I DID THE STRATEGY AMENDMENT. ZONING INSTANCE'31300020. > > THAT ' S BEEN MOVED AND CORRECTLY SECONDED, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR LET IT BE KNOWN BY RAISING YOUR RIGHT HAND. ANY RESISTANCE? ALL RIGHT. >> > > PLAN CHANGE CASE A-1 30007 HAS ACTUALLY PASSED 13 FOR AND 1 OPPOSED. ZONING CASE Z1300020 IS PASSED WITH 13 FOR AND 1 AGAINST. >> > > THANKS, WE ' LL ACTION TO FURTHER HEARING THING 5B, CHAPEL CREEK PLAN CHANGE INSTANCE A-1 30005 AND ZONING INSTANCE Z1300014. >> > > EXCELLENT EVENING, COMMISSIONERS,'I ' M HANNAH JACOBSON WITH THE DURHAM PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND I'' LL BE PRESENTING THE PLAN CHANGE INSTANCE FOR CHAPEL CREEK, INSTANCE A130005.THE APPLICANT IS DAVID WEEKLY HOUSES AND THEY ARE SUGGESTING TO AMEND APPROXIMATELY 17 ACRES OF THE FUTURE LAND USAGE MAP FROM MEDIUM HIGH THICKNESS RESIDENTIAL TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. THIS ADJUSTMENT WOULD REPRESENT A DECREASE IN THE ALLOWABLE DENSITY FROM 8 TO 20 UNITS PER ACRE TO 4 DEVICES PER ACRE OR LESS. THE PROPOSAL INCORPORATES 28 PARCELS WHICH ARE SITUATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GEORGE KING ROAD AND NORTH OF FREEWAY 54. THE BROADER AREA IS PROBABLY FAMILIAR TO A LOT OF YOU. THIS IS An ACTIVE, THIS IS NEARBY THE HECTIC JUNCTION OF FREEWAY 54 AND INTERSTATE 40. DUE TO THE FACT THAT OF ITS DISTANCE TO THE LEE VILLAGE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION STATION LOCATED APPROXIMATELY HERE, the SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN A COUNTRY TRANSIT AREA. HOWEVER, IT COULD CHANGE ALONG WITH THE PLACEMENT COULD SHIFT A LITTLE WITH REFRESHER COURSE AND THE ECOLOGICAL INFLUENCE DECLARATIONS. THE TERMINAL IS ANTICIPATED TO BE A VERY IMPORTANT STATION FOR THE DURHAM ORANGE LIGHT RAIL LINE THAT WOULD TRAVELING IN BETWEEN CHURCH HILL AND DURHAM. IT ' S EXPECTED TO RIDE and be a park AREA AS WELL AS AN IMPORTANT ONE FOR TRANSPORTATION ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT. IF I COULD I WOULD LIKE TO BACK UP AND EXPLAIN A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT WE MEAN BY TRANSPORTATION ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT. THERE ' S AN COMPANY CALLED RECONNECTING AMERICA THAT DEFINES IT AS A SORT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT THAT INCLUDES A MIXTURE OF HOUSING, WORKPLACE, RETAIL AND OTHER AMENITIES INCORPORATED RIGHT INTO A WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOOD AND LOCATED WITHIN A FIFTY PERCENT MILE OF QUALITY PUBLIC TRANSPORT. IN DURHAM OUR APPROACH TO TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN TO DESIGNATE AREAS AROUND THESE PROPOSED STATIONS AS EITHER SUBURBAN TRANSIT AREAS OR COMPACT NEIGHBORHOODS. RURAL TRANSPORTATION AREAS ARE THOSE THAT ARE RESERVED TO EVENTUALLY END UP BEING COMPACT NEIGHBORHOODS AND AFTERWARDS EITHER SINCE OUR POLICIES OR GUIDELINES ARE MADE TO ENCOURAGE A MIX OF MAKES USE OF ALONG WITH HIGHER DENSITY MAKES USE OF TO ASSISTANCE THE TRANSIT.A CONCERN FREQUENTLY COMES UP, WHAT KIND OF THICKNESS SUSTAINS RAIL TRANSPORTATION. THERE ARE A GREAT DEAL OF RESEARCHES AND REPORTS THAT HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED THAT EMPHASIZE THAT IT ' S A CONTEXT SENSITIVE AND DEPENDING ON A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT ELEMENTS. THERE IS GENERALLY A RULE THAT THE AVERAGE DENSITY THROUGHOUT THE TRANSIT STATION SHOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 25 UNITS PER ACRE, NO LESS THAN 8 UNITS PER ACRE FOR A PARTICULAR GROWTH. IN DURHAM WE RECOGNIZE THAT THICKNESS MUST BE HIGHEST CLOSEST TO THE TRANSIT STATION AND AFTER THAT THE ASSISTANCE AREAS SHOULD BE LESS DENSE AS YOU MOVE FURTHER AWAY AND SHIFT INTO SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES. THIS IS A PATTERN THAT HAS BEEN SUPPORTED IN THE 2005 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE WEBSITE IS RECOMMENDED, LIKE I CLAIMED PRIOR TO, FOR A MEDIUM-HIGH THICKNESS RESIDENTIAL, 8 TO 20 UNITS PER ACRE. IN 2011 THERE WAS ANOTHER RESEARCH STUDY THAT LOOKED RIGHT INTO THE TRANSPORT NETWORK IN THE congestion and the location. THAT RESEARCH WAS LED BY THE DCHC METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT COMPANY THAT ENTAILED A LOT OF OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AS WELL, INCLUDING THE DURHAM PREPARATION DEPARTMENT. IT INCLUDED THE CONCEPTUAL LAND USAGE PLAN THAT APPEARS LIKE THIS. THIS IS THE PASSAGE, IT ' S A CONCEPT PLAN, IT ' S NOT PARCEL-SPECIFIC. BUT GENERALLY THIS IS THE LEE VILLAGE STATION RIGHT RIGHT HERE AND IT SHOWS THE A LOT OF EXTREME DEGREE OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHT AROUND THE TERMINAL AND REDUCING AT A GRADIENT WITH LOWER INTENSITY DEVELOPMENT SORT OF AS YOU RELOCATE AWAY FROM THE STATION. THE SITE OF THE PROPOSED PLAN MODIFICATION IS LOCATED RIGHT ARPD RIGHT HERE AND IT ' S THE PALEST YELLOW COLOR. THAT ' S INDICATED AS BEING A RESIDENTIAL 2 WHICH IS LATER IN THE PLAN DESCRIBED TO BE 6 TO 12 HOME UNITS PER ACRE. THE CANDIDATE DESCRIBES THAT STUDIES THE NC54 HALLWAY STUDYINGS AS REASON FOR A LOW THICKNESS RESIDENTIAL PHRASE IT ADVISES SOLITARY FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEED TO HAPPEN THERE. THE CANDIDATE ALSO MAKES FACTORS THAT LOW DENSITY IS MORE SUITABLE WITH THE SURROUNDING EXISTING ADVANCEMENT PATTERN AND IT WOULD BETTER PROTECT WATER TOP QUALITY IN THE FLOODING CONTROL. STAFF DIFFERS WITH THE APPLICANT ON A NUMBER OF VARIOUS FACTORS. FIRST, WE DON ' T BELIEVE THAT THE SIRBS THAT ARE BORDERING THIS SITE JUSTIFY An ADJUSTMENT IN THE FUTURE LAND USAGE PLAN. PREPARING FOR THE DURHAM ORANGE LIGHT RAIL LINE HAS GAINED MOMENTUM IN CURRENT YEARS.THERE WAS A 2011 CITIZEN ACCEPTED SALES TAX MANDATE, THERE HAS BEEN AN FOSTERING OF A LOCALLY RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE AND SUBMISSION OF A MAJOR FUNDING GIVE FOR THE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, THAT WAS THE NEW BEGINS GIVE. IN OTHER WORDS WE BELIEVE THE SCENARIOS HAVE ACTUALLY ALTERED IN A MEANS
THAT EMPHASIZE AND SUPPORT THE NEED FOR HIGHER DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AROUND THE TRANSPORTATION TERMINAL, NOT THE OPPOSITE. WE ALSO FEELING THE NC54 PASSAGE RESEARCH DOES NOT CONTRADICT THE SUGGESTED LAND USAGE STRATEGY FOR THIS AREA. THE RESEARCH STUDY DOES ASK FOR SIPG HE WILL CERTAINLY FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILT BETWEEN 6 AND 12 UNITS PER ACRE. THAT HAS MORE ALIKE WITH OUR PROPOSED LAND USE DESIGNATION THAN THE RECOMMENDED LOW DENSITY DESIGNATION.ADDITIONALLY I BELIEVE TO FACTOR OUT THAT TOOL HIGH DENSITY DOES NOT NECESSARILY OMIT SINGLE HOUSEHOLD FROM BEING DEVELOPED. LOTS OF THE OLDER STANDARD AREA IN DURHAM ARE BUILT AT THICKNESS BETWEEN 8 AND 10 UNITS PER ACRE. HERE ' S AN EXAMPLE, GOLDEN BELT. THIS IS A ONE-ACRE, APPROXIMATELY ONE-ACRE BLOCK IN WHICH THERE ARE 9 SOLITARY FAMILY HOUSE UNITS BUILT. THERE ARE INSTANCES, IN OLD WEST DURHAM AND NORTH GATE PARK AND RIGHT HERE IS ANOTHER ONE AT BURRAGE METHOD AND THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 18 TO 20 SINGLE FAMILY MEMBERS RESIDENTIAL FRAMEWORKS. THE DENSITY– SO SINGLE FAMILY DOES NOT ALWAYS MEAN LOW THICKNESS IS THE FACTOR. REGARDLESS OF OUR WORRIES, STAFF HAS ACTUALLY ASSESSED THE DEMAND VERSUS THE 4 STANDARD FOR PLAN CHANGES LOCATED IN THE UNIFIED ADVANCEMENT STRATEGY ORDINANCE. WE FIND THAT LOW DENSITY WOULD BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED PLANS NOTED IN THE STAFF RECORD. AN OVERARCHING THEME THROUGHOUT THE STRATEGY IS TO ASSISTANCE COMPACT ADVANCEMENT NEAR THE SUGGESTED TRANSIT STATION AND TEAM LOCATES THAT LOW DENSITY DOES NOT ADD TO THESE GOALS OR OUTCOMES. WHILE THE RECOMMENDED LOW DENSITY IS MORE COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING GROWTH PATTERN, IT ' S NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE FUTURE VISION WHICH ONCE AGAIN IS MORE HIGHER DENSITY COMMERCIAL AND WORKPLACE. TEAM LOCATES THAT WHILE THE EFFECTS OF THIS PARTICULAR TASK MIGHT BE RELATIVELY SMALL FOR TRANSPORT AND FOR VARIOUS OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, THAT THE POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS OF ESTABLISHING A PRECEDENT TO MODIFICATION THE POLICY TO LOW THICKNESS AND TRANSIT TERMINALS COULD POSSIBLY JEOPARDIZE THE CAPABILITY FOR OUR COMPETITIVENESS IN THE FEDERAL GIVE APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND THAT WOULD BE A SIGNIFICANT UNFAVORABLE OUTCOME.FINALLY, PERSONNEL DOES FEELING THAT THE WEBSITE IS OF ADEQUATE FORM AND SIZE TO FIT THE SUGGESTED LAND USAGE. WE ARE RECOMMENDING DENIAL BASED ON NOT ENOUGH REASON AND DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE RECOMMENDED LAND USE STOPS WORKING TO FULFILL 3 OF THE 4 STANDARDS. > > EXCELLENT NIGHT, AMY WOLF AGAIN WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRESENTING THE PROPOSED MAP ADJUSTMENT DEMAND CONNECTED WITH THIS WEBSITE. CHURCH CREEK, Z1300014. THIS IS AN FIRST ZONING WHICH IMPLIES THAT THERE ' S A PENDING ADDITION LINKED WITH THIS DEMAND AND HEREAFTER REQUEST IS LISTENED TO BEFORE THE
INTENDING COMMISSION IT WILL BE HEARD PRIOR TO COUNCIL AS A CONSOLIDATED THING WITH THE PLAN CHANGE AND THE ZONING CASE COMPLETELY. THE REQUEST IS FROM RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN 20 TO RESIDENTIAL 3.919, WHICH IS OUR LOW DENSITY LAND USE DESIGNATION. IT >> ' S 17.1 ACRES AND THE PROPOSITION IS FOR 50 SOLITARY FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND THAT IS A DEVOTED HOUSING TYPE FOR THIS DEMAND. THE SITE IS THE EAST SIDE OF GEORGE KING ROAD AND NORTH CELESTE CIRCLE. THERE'ARE 2 UNTAUGHT STREETS IN ADDITION TO DEDICATED ROAD FACILITIES THROUGH THE SITE. CROSS LANE DRIVE FROM CELESTE CIRCLE IN ADDITION TO RIDGE MEANS ROAD OFF CELESTE CIRCLE.THE SITE IS BOUNDED REVERSE– ON GEORGE KING ROADWAY, ANOTHER PERSON OPPOSITE SIDE OF GEORGE KING AREA IS MILITARY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HOME WHICH IS USED FOR FLOODING CONTROL. THE SITE IS ALSO ENCUMBERED BY THE WATER PROTECTION CORRIDOR OVERLAY ON A SECTION OF IT, THE LIMIT OF THE MAJOR TRANSPORT OVERLAY IS ON THIS LINE. IT IS 28 PARCELS, HALF ACRE LOTS, AND THE DEMAND AGAIN IS A PVR OF 3.9. THIS DOES SATISFY THE RECOMMENDED AND THE APPLICANT HAS ACTUALLY DEVOTED TO SINGLE HOUSEHOLD. THE EXISTING CONDITIONS ON THE SITE ARE SHOWN HERE, IT ' S An UNINHABITED FORESTED WEBSITE. THERE IS A GAS LINE EASEMENT GOING THROUGH THE EDGE OF IT CLOSEST TO NC54 HIGHWAY, WHICH IS PARALLEL TO THE SOUTHERLY VIEW LINE. THE PROPOSITION REVEALS A VARIETY OF COMMITMENTS, 4 GAIN ACCESS TO POINTS, TWO PROSPECTIVE STREAM CROSSINGS, ONE COMING AT CROSSLAND DRIVE ALONG WITH ANOTHER FOR A POTENTIAL ROADWAY LAYOUT. SINCE IT IS IN THE COUNTRY TRANSPORTATION AREA, there IS A PHASING STRATEGY LINKED WITH THIS REQUEST. THIS REQUEST DOES SHOW LODGING OF OUR EMBRACED CONDITIONS THAT ARE ANOTHER SITE WHICH KLUT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ALONG GEORGE KING ROAD AS WELL AS THE SOUTHERN SOUTHWEST DURHAM DRIVE WHICH GETS ON THE COLLECTOR STREET PLAN.SO THOSE COMMITMENTS, MAXIMUM OF 50 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, ACCESSIBILITY FACTOR, THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA OPTIMUM WOULD BE COMMITTED TO A MAXIMUM OF HALF, WHICH WOULD OTHERWISE BE ALLOWED AT 70 PERCENT IN THE WATERSHED PROTECTION OVERLAY, AND THE TREE PRESERVATION IS A MINIMAL OF 20 PERCENT. EVERYTHING YOU SEE ON THE SUGGESTED SITE LAYOUT IS COMMITTED AND THERE ' S A NUMBER OF TEXT DEDICATIONS BEING THE HOUSING KIND WILL CERTAINLY BE SINGLE FAMILY, MINIMUM LOT DIMENSION, 4,000 SQUARE FEET, AGAIN DEDICATION OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR THOSE TAKEN ON INTENDS AND CONSTRUCTING THE ENTHUSIAST ROAD VIA THE WEBSITE ALONG WITH CREATING THE EXISTING SECTION OF CROSSLAND DRIVE AND RIDGE MEANS ROADWAY WHICH ARE OFF WEBSITE FROM CELESTE CIRCLE. THE REQUEST IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE EXTENSIVE PLAN, WHICH MISS JACOBSON JUST EXPLAINED, AND I SIMPLY INTENDED TO MENTION RIGHT HERE, TOO, THE PURPLE LINE ON THIS MAP IS THE UB URBAN TRANSIT AREA AND THE PROPOSED STATION ON THE TOP OF THE SCREEN.THE DEMAND DOES SATISFY OTHER POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IT IS KUPB SIFRT STEPBT WITH UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT REGULATION BUT THIS DEMAND IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE THOROUGH STRATEGY IN ITS ENTIRETY. IT ' S REGULAR WITH THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT STATUTE. I ' M AVAILABLE TO ANSWER YOUR INQUIRIES. > > MARK? > > MANY THANKS. WE HAVE 3– YES, 3 PEOPLE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF AND 3 AGAINST. THE 3 FOR ' S IS JARED SCOTT AGAINST CLARENCE BOOKER. > > JARED EDENS WITH EDEN HOME. I FAEL LIKE I ' M IN BIZARRO WORLD SINCE I AS THE APPLICANT AM COMING TO REQUEST LESS THICKNESS THAN WHAT THE PREPARING DIVISION IS WANTING ME TO ASK FOR IS HE THAT MAY BE THE INDICATION OF THE APOCALYPSE.
THE TEAM REPORT REFERS NUMEROUS TIMES TO THE FREEWAY 54 CORRIDOR RESEARCH, A GREAT DEAL OF MOIP WAS SPEPT ON THAT STUDIES IT ' S An EXCELLENT DEVICE BUT THAT ' S ALL IT IS, IT ' S A TOOL. IT'' S NOT THE LAW, IT ' S NEVER BEEN TOOK ON BY THE COMMON COUNCIL, THERE ' S BEEN NUMEROUS OPPORTUNITIES TO EMBRACE IT.BUT LET ' S USAGE IT AS A TOOL. IT DOES RECOMMEND 6 TO 12 UNITS PER ACRE BUT ALSO SUGGESTS THAT THIS PARCEL IS LOCATED IN THE RESIDENTIAL 2 AREA >> WITH SINGLE FAMILY MEMBERS MAKES USE OF BEING APPROPRIATE. HANNAH HAD DISCUSSED SEVERAL NEIGHBORHOODS IN DURHAM THAT HAVE 8, 10, 12 SYSTEMS PER ACRE. I HAVE NO DOUBT THERE ARE NEIGHBORHOODS IN DURHAM THAT CONTAINER HIT THAT LIMIT BUT THEY WERE ESTABLISHED A GAZILLON YEARS BACK AND DIDN ' T HAVE TREE BARRIERS. WHEN YOU TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION EVERYTHING REQUIRED FOR SINGLE HOUSEHOLD'CODES IT WOULD BE HARD TO HIT THAT 8 TO 10 IN THE CURRENT STATUTE. IT ' S DIFFICULT TO DO WITH TOWN HOMES, MUCH LESS SINGLE HOUSEHOLD RESIDENTIAL. IF I COULD RENAME THIS TASK, I WOULD RENAME IT THE TRANSITION AT CHURCH CREEK. EAST WOOD PARK GROWTH TO THE SOUTH, EVERY PARCEL BECAUSE DEVELOPMENT IS AROUND.46 ACRES IN DIMENSION, I EXAMINED NUMEROUS ONES TODAY. THAT ' S LESS THAN TWO SYSTEMS PER ACRE when YOU DEDUCT OUT ROAD RIGHT OF MEANS. TO ME, WHAT IS EVEN MORE, WHAT IS BETTER CHANGE GOING FROM LESS TO 2 PER ACRE TO 8 TO 20, OR GOING FROM LESS THAN 2 PER ACRE TO ABOUT 4 PER ACRE. WE TALK ABOUT TRANSITIONS IN PREPARATION FREQUENTLY AND TO ME THAT ' S WHAT THIS JOB PROVIDES IS AN APPROPRIATE TRANSITION. IT ALSO PROVIDES A BARRIER TO A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WAS ESTABLISHED 30, 40 YEARS BACK LONG BEFORE OUR RAIL STATION WAS EVER SPOKE ABOUT, THIS TASK AT ABOUT 4 AN ACRE WILL CERTAINLY OFFER SOMEWHAT OF A BARRIER TO THAT EXISTING COMMUNITY. I BELIEVE THAT ' S A FAVORABLE THING. WHEN WE SPEAK ABOUT THICKNESS, HANNAH HAD DISCUSSED YOU WANT APPROXIMATELY 20 TO 25 SYSTEMS PER ACRE FOR A RAIL LOCATION. I DON ' T DISPUTE THAT WHATSOEVER, BUT I'DO KNOW THAT THIS 15, 17 ACRE WEBSITE IS NOT THE BE-ALL END-ALL LAST OPPORTUNITY FOR HIGH THICKNESS IN DURHAM YEAR THE RAIL TERMINAL. THERE ' S 65 ACRES TO THE NORTH PEOPLE I ' M RATHER PARTICULAR THAT THE OWNERS OF THAT HOME ARE NOT GOING TO GET ON OUR CRITERION AND COME AND ASK FOR LOW THICKNESS ON THAT PARTICULAR 65 ACRES, I JUST PUT ON ' T SEE THAT HAPPENING. YOU CAN STILL ESTABLISH THIS SITE AT 4 ACRES, DEVELOP THE 65 ACRES AT A GREATER THICKNESS, YOU WILL CERTAINLY STILL OBTAIN THE INTERNET THICKNESS OF 20 TO 25 AN ACRE OVER THE WHOLE AREA SO I STILL THINK WE CANISTER SUPPORT THE RAIL ALSO WITH THIS SHIFT ITEM. WE HAD An AREA MEETING BACK IN MAY A COUPLE WEEKS AGO I HAD EMAILED EVERY PERSON WHO PARTICIPATED IN, LET'THEM KNOW THE INTENDING COMMISSION MEETING WAS COMING UP IF YOU WISHED TO HAVE ANY CONVERSATIONS, I RECEIVED SEVERAL FAVORABLE EMAILS REGARDING THE PROJECT.BUT ONCE MORE SIMPLY TO SUM UP RXZ IT ' S RARE FOR A CLIENT TO ASK ME TO APPLY FOR A'ZONING CHOICE COUNTRY THAT ' S NOT MATCHING OUT THE THICKNESS BUT WE REALLY FEEL IS IT A GREAT JOB, IS IT An EXCELLENT PRODUCT. DAVID WHITELY BUILDS GREAT HOMES AND MY
BIASED VIEWPOINT THE RESPONSE IS NO AND I VALUE YOUR TIME, I ' LL BE HAPPY TO SOLUTION ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE. > > I ' M CHRIS ALBE, I POSSESS MY HOME AT 138 WEST CIRCLE IN THE CITY OF DURHAM. MY PROPERTY IS RIGHT BESIDE THE CHURCH CREEK WEBSITE. MY AREA, EAST WOOD PARK, EXISTS BETWEEN CHAPEL CREEK AND THE BUSY NC54. A RESIDENTIAL LASTING LAND USE FOR EAST WOOD PARK WAS ADVISED BY THE NC54 I-40 HALLWAY RESEARCH STUDY AND I KNOW SERVICES GO FOR ABOUT A THOUSAND DOLLARS A MONTH BELOW IN EAST TIMBER PARK. CHAPEL CREEK WILL BE A WELCOME ADDITION
TO OUR LOCAL COMMUNITY. CHURCH CREEK WILL CERTAINLY BE RATHER HIGHER THICKNESS THAN EAST WOOD PARK, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH DURHAM ' S PLAN TO HAVE IPBS CEASING DENSITY AS YOU GET CLOSER TO LEE TOWN, THE PROPOEDSD TRANSPORTATION FACILITY LESS THAN A MILE AWAY. REALLY NEAR TO CHURCH CREEK IS A RECENTLY APPROVED CAROLINA CROSSING 2, WHICH IS A REALLY HIGH THICKNESS DEVELOPMENT WITH PROPOSED
>> MEDICAL USE. TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION WITH EACH OTHER, CHURCH CREEK AND THE NEIGHBORING CAROLINA CROSSING 2 CONSTITUTE MIXED USE, TRANSPORTATION SUPPORTIVE ADVANCEMENT. A PROBLEM I HAVE IS ABOUT AVAILABILITY. THEY NOTED THERE ARE 4 FACTORS OF GAIN ACCESS TO FOR THEIR COMMUNITY. > > FORGIVE ME, SIR, DO YOU REQUIRED AID WITH THE POWERPOINT? > > NO, I OBTAINED IT. TWO OF THEM GO INTO OUR AREA BELOW AND THEN THERE ARE TWO STUB OUTS RIGHT INTO THE TIMBERS HERE. THAT SUGGESTS ALL THE WEB TRAFFIC WILL UNDERGO OUR NAIBTD ON TO NC54, WHICH IS A MESS, AND I WOULD APPRECIATE IF IT WERE POSSIBLE, THERE ARE TWO DEAD END ON THIS SIDE RATHER THAN A CUL-DE-SAC HERE MAKE IT WEB LINK TO GEORGE KING AND CREATE A DEAD END AS OPPOSED TO A STUB OUT RIGHT HERE IN THE WOODS. THAT WOULD ALLOW United States TO ACCESSIBILITY NORTHERN CHAPEL HILLSIDE AND SOUTHERN DURHAM CONVENIENTLY INSTEAD THAN GOING ON NC54. I ' M PENALTY, I ' M DONE. BUT OTHER THAN THAT, I EXTREMELY MUCH SUPPORT APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR ADDITION AND REZONING AND SUGGEST ENCOURAGING THE CANDIDATE TO IMPROVE CONNECTIVITY IN THE LOCATION BY CONNECTING CHURCH CREEK WITH GEORGE KING ROAD. >> THANKS. > > GREAT EVENING, MY NAME IS LYNN SCOTT AND >> I LIVE AT 211 CELESTE CIRCLE, ALL NEW CITIZEN OF THE county and the city, TRANSFERRED TO DURHAM IN AUGUST. I QUITE SUPPORT THIS NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE PROPOSITION THAT ' S BEEN PUT AHEAD. TO ME, IT FINISHES THE INITIAL PREPARE FOR EAST WOOD PARK WHICH I NEED TO SAY IS A CHARMING NEIGHBORHOOD. I NEVER KNEW MY NEIGHBORS IN CARY I RELOCATED TO THIS AREA AND WE HAD A BLOCK EVENT. AND I ' D LOVE TO SEE THAT MAINTAINED. IT ' S A FUNCTIONING CLASS NEIGHBORHOOD AND I ' D LIKE TO SEE IT STAY A FAMILY MEMBERS COMMUNITY, WHICH I ASSUME THIS PLAN WILL CERTAINLY DO. THE VARIOUS OTHER THING I DESIRED TO EXPLAIN IS WE ARE RIGHT RIGHT HERE AND WE BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY, THE PROPRIETORS OF THAT PROPERTY PUT IN$ 10,000 TO FIX THE WATER ISSUES. I WOULD MOTIVATE YOU TO THINK OF THIS LAND. IT ' S WET LANDS AND I BELIEVE THE DEVELOPER NEEDS TO BE ABLE TO DEVELOP THE LAND IN A MANNER THAT WILL NOT DEVELOP WATER ISSUES. THOSE RESIDENTS AREN ' T GOING TO WANT IT, THERE ' S A CREEK THERE AND I BELIEVE THAT NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED. I LIKE'THE CONCEPT OF HAVING ANOTHER PERSON ACCESSIBILITY POINT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE TRAFFIC CONTAINER BE DISPURSED BUT MOSTLY I INTEND TO SAY HOW MUCH I WANT THIS STRATEGY AND I THANK THE PROGRAMMERS FOR BRINGING IT AHEAD AND I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. > > WE HAVE 3 WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION'TO. > > THANK YOU, MY NAME IS JARED HARRIS,'I LIVE AT 978 CRAG MONT IN BERKLEY, CALIFORNIA. MY FAMILY OWNS THE 65 ACRES ON THE NORTH BORDER OF THE RECOMMENDED GROWTH. WE ' VE OWNED THIS LAND SINCE 1979, WE STILL OWN YOUR HOME AND LOVE THAT HOUSE AND WE ' VE GOTTEN INNUMERABLE PROPOSITIONS, QUICKLY DOZENS OF PROPOSALS LIKE THIS FOR THE 65 ACRES WE OWN. WE ' VE ALWAYS REJECTED THEM IN THE LAST THIRTY YEARS SO IT STARTED NOT LONG AFTER WE BOUGHT THAT LAND BEFORE THERE WAS EVEN SEWER OR'WATER AVAILABLE FOR IT. WE BEGAN TO JOIN PLANNING FOR TRANSIT IN 2002. I WENT TO A SHURETTE EARLY ON BECAUSE PROCESS AS PART OF THE DETAILED PLAN REVISION THAT PUT THE LEE VILLAGE TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT ON THE MAP, SO I ' VE BEEN REALLY ENTAILED, REALLY HELPFUL OF THE ENTIRE TRANSIT PREPARING PROCESS FOR A LONG TIME. AND OUR TEAM BELIEVE THAT THE LEE >> TOWN SITE IS CRITICAL TO ASSISTANCE THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION PLANS THAT ARE CURRENTLY OBTAINING MOMENTUM.WE ' VE BEEN CONCERNED FOR YEARS CONCERNING THE DISTRICT ACQUIRING CHIPPED AWAY BY DIFFERENT ADVANCEMENT PROPOSITIONS. OBVIOUSLY OTHER INDIVIDUALS WITH LAND IN THE AREA HAVE BEEN APPROACHED IN VARIOUS METHODS. AT ONE POINT PULTE HAD 24 ACRES, THAT GOT MOVED MORE RIGHT INTO THE LEE VILLAGE PLANNING WHEN THAT WAS ACQUIRED BY ANOTHER PROGRAMMER. AND WE AGREE WITH THE PERSONNEL EVALUATION. WE THINK IT WOULD BE An EXTREMELY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TO THE OVERALL PLAN IF THIS WAS ACCEPTED. WE THINK THE PROPOSAL GOES IN EXACTLY THE WRONG INSTRUCTIONS.
IT ALSO HAS BASIC APPLICATION AND I WASN'' T GOING TO REFERENCE THIS, BUT– IN REALITY I ' M GOING TO DELAY UNTIL ITEM 8C COMES UP BECAUSE THAT ' S An EVEN MORE SUITABLE TIME. THE PERSONNEL RECORD REFERS NUMEROUS TIMES TO THE FREEWAY 54 HALLWAY RESEARCH STUDY, A WHOLE LOT OF MOIP WAS SPEPT ON THAT RESEARCHES IT ' S A TERRIFIC DEVICE BUT THAT ' S ALL IT IS, IT ' S A DEVICE. IT'' S NOT THE REGULATION, IT ' S NEVER BEEN EMBRACED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, THERE ' S BEEN NUMEROUS OPPORTUNITIES TO EMBRACE IT.BUT LET ' S USAGE IT AS A TOOL. THERE ' S 65 ACRES TO THE NORTH OF United States I ' M RATHER SPECIFIC THAT THE OWNERS OF THAT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY ARE NOT GOING TO JUMP ON OUR PRECEDENT AND COME AND ASK FOR LOW THICKNESS ON THAT 65 ACRES, I JUST DON ' T SEE THAT HAPPENING. I ' M PENALTY, I ' M DONE.> > YOU TIN ' T? > > MY INQUIRY IS FOR MR. EDENS.YOU A WHILE AGO SAID THERE IS NOTHING IN THE PLAN THAT REVEALS THE RAIL IS EVEN DESIGNED TO COME WITH THERE, CORRECT? > > I ' LL PROVIDE MY 2 CENTS AND I THINK WE CONTAINER TAKE An ACTIVITY AFTER THIS.
> > THANK YOU, PAYMENT RERS, MY NAME IS JOHN EDE, I LIVE ON CRESCENT DRIVE IN CHAPEL HILL. > > COMMISSIONER. > > YOU CAN ' T? > > BEEN RELOCATED AND EFFECTIVELY SECONDED, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR LET IT BE KNOWN BY RAISING YOUR RIGHT HAND. > > JARED EDENS OF EDENS LAND COURT.> > MOVED AND APPROPRIATELY SECONDED, ALL THOSE IN SUPPORT LET IT BE KNOWN BY RAISING YOUR RIGHT HAND. > > THANK YOU. > >.
> > TURN YOUR MIC ON. > > SORRY. > > DO WE HAVE ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS THING? > > THANK YOU. > > I THINK THAT ' S A REASONABLE CHARACTERIZATION.THANK YOU A LOT. >> >
> THANK YOU.SO PRIOR TO WE OBTAIN TO THE ACTIVITY, LIKE I CLAIMED, JUST KEEP IN MIND THIS IS REALLY EVEN MORE OF A STARTING AREA TO START A DISCUSSION AND TOGETHER WITH THE FINANCIAL THINGS THAT WERE DISCUSSED EARLIER TODAY, SO YOU MIGHT NOT SPECIFICALLY AGREE WITH EVERY WORD IN HERE BUT I ASSUME WE CONTAINER GET A GOOD CONVERSATION BEGAN SO WE CONTAINER A MINIMUM OF HAVE A PLAN, AN OFFICIAL DOCUMENTED STRATEGY HOW WE'' RE GOING TO ADDRESS THE AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE IN DURHAM'AND THAT'' S WHY I ' M
GOING TO ASSISTANCE THIS. I THINK WE NEED TO HAVE AN AUTHORITIES PLAN. APPLICATION IS GOING TO BE TRICK BUT THE PLANNING IS GOING TO BE SO IMPORTANT PRIOR TO WE GET TO IMPLEMENTING IT BECAUSE WHAT WE BEGAN TO SEE, WHAT WE SEE A LOT IN DURHAM AND BORDERING NEIGHBORHOODS IS WE HAVE PREPARES FOR MASS TRANSPORTATION, REAL ESTATE, MIXED USE, BUT WHAT OFTEN TENDS TO TAKE PLACE IS THE CITIZENS WHO OPERATE IN THOSE ASSISTANCE FUNCTIONS OR THE RESIDENTS THAT MAY HAVE THE PUBLIC SECTOR JOBS THAT MAY NOT MAKE A GREAT DEAL TO AFFORD WHAT THEY ARE ACTUALLY BUILDING OR BELONGING OF, THOSE ARE NORMALLY PEOPLE NEGLECT LITERALLY IN THE CHILLY SOMETIMES.SO I THINK AS WE BEGIN TO ADDRESS THAT AS A CITY WE CAN HAVE A CLEAR STRATEGY AS TO HOW WE NEED TO ADDRESS IT AS A CITY, AS A COUNTY, AS NUMEROUS NEIGHBORHOODS. I WILL CERTAINLY BE SUPPORTING THIS WITH SOME CONCERN BUT I WILL BE SUPPORTING DUE TO THE FACT THAT I LIKE THE INTENT OF IT. >> > > MR. CHAIR, I MOVE THAT THE DURHAM PLANNING COMMISSION TAKE PLACE RECORD SUPPORTING THE RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE AROUND THE TRANSPORTATION AREAS AND BUS HUBS AND SEND IT ON TO OUR GOVERNING BODIES WITH OUR HOPE THAT THEY WILL CERTAINLY SUSTAIN IT ADDITIONALLY. >> > > SECOND >>. > > RELOCATED AND EFFECTIVELY SECONDED, ALL THOSE IN SUPPORT LET IT BE KNOWN BY RAISING YOUR RIGHT-HAND MAN. OKAY, ANY RESISTANCE? >> > > MOVEMENT IS BROUGHT 14-0.
>> > > MANY THANKS, WE WILL CERTAINLY RELOCATE TO PRODUCT 8B, WHICH IS THE RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCING TO THE PREPARING DIVISION I ASSUME REVEREND WHITELY WANT TO SAY SOMETHING ADDITIONAL MAYBE. OTHERWISE, LET'' S GO >>–. > > YOU KNOW, IT HAS BEEN THE AIM FIRSTLY I WISH TO CLARIFY SOMETHING THAT WAS CLAIMED EARLIER. DURHAM CITY BOARD HAS BEEN IN THE FRONT IN MOVING BUDGET-FRIENDLY HOUSING. THEY ARE THE ONE THAT HAVE PRESSED FOR PEOPLE' ' INVOLVEMENT IN SETUP POLICY FOR AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE. YOU CAN SEE THAT IN WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE SOUTH SIDE, 149 DIFFERENT DEVICES THAT ARE BEING BUILT AS AFFORDABLE HOUSING. TO REACH MY FACTOR, NEIGHBORHOODS LIKE SOUTH SIDE AND EAST DURHAM CONTAINER NOT AFFORD TO BE VERSUS GROWTH. AND WE CONTAINER NOT HAVE SMART DEVELOPMENT IN OUR COMMUNITIES WITH A GOVERNING BODY CUTTING CASH OUT OF PLANNING. I ASSUME THERE'' S, WHAT, 128 VARIOUS PRIORITY ITEMS ON THE FUNCTION STRATEGY. >> > > 118. > > 118 THAT WE UNDERSTOOD CANISTER ' T ACCOMPLISH IN ONE YEAR. TO CUT POSITIONS OUT OF PREPARATION SUGGESTS THAT WE BELONG THE PROCEDURES OF HEALING OUR NEEDED NEIGHBORHOODS.SO I WOULD ASK THIS BODY TO JOIN ME IN APPROVING, AT LEAST SENDING A MESSAGE TO BOTH THE CITY AND THE REGION THAT THEIR MONEY MUST BE RECOVERED. > > SECONDLY. > > RELOCATED AND EFFECTIVELY SECONDED. ANY CONVERSATION? > > IN >> WHAT TYPE ARE WE SENDING THIS? IS IT SOME SORT OF WRITTEN DECLARATION IN I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THAT DECLARATION TO MAKE SURE THAT IT ' S WELL WRITTEN AND WELL COMMUNICATED THAT WE AS A BODY AGREE UPON. > > ABSOLUTELY. > > SO WHAT WE GON NA DO IS WE >> ' RE GOING >> TO– SO WHAT WE'CONTAINER DO IS WE ' RE GOING TO ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR RESOLUTION AND WE ' RE GOING TO ASK THAT REVEREND WHITELY PERHAPS DEAL WITH VARIOUS OTHER ENTITIES AND PERHAPS OFFER A RESOLUTION IN WRITTEN KIND NEXT MONTH, MAYBE WE CAN HAVE SOMETHING AUTHORITIES THAT EVERYONE CONTAINER CONCUR ON THE LANGUAGE, BUT I BELIEVE IN PRINCIPLE WE AGREE BUT I ASSUME THE DEVIL IS IN THE INFORMATION, REVEREND WHITELY, IF I TIN USAGE THAT, IS THAT OK? OKAY. SO, YES, HOMEWORK, WE ' RE GOING
TO HAVE TO DO RESOLUTION'FOR NEXT MONTH AFTER THAT I ASSUME WE CAN HAVE SOME EXCELLENT TRACTION TOGETHER WITH WHAT HAPPENED TODAY. IF THAT ' S O.K., OK, CANISTER WE TABLE IT?. > > ANNOUNCEMENTS, WHAT DO WE HAVE NEXT MONTH. > > WE HAVE 4 TEXT AMENDMENTS FOR NEXT CONFERENCE >>. > > IF ALL HEARTS AND MINDS ARE CLEAR WE WILL CERTAINLY PROCEED AND ADJOURN. THANK YOU.(MEETING ADJOURNED ).
> > MOVED AND CORRECTLY SECONDED, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR LET IT BE KNOWN BY RAISING YOUR RIGHT HAND. > > THANK YOU, WE WILL RELOCATE DOWN TO THING 8B, WHICH IS THE REPAIR OF FINANCING TO THE PREPARING DIVISION I ASSUME REVEREND WHITELY WOULD LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING ADDITIONAL MAYBE. > > 118 THAT WE KNOW CONTAINER ' T GET DONE IN ONE YEAR. > > SECONDLY. > > NEWS, WHAT DO WE HAVE NEXT MONTH.