>> > > GOOD MID-DAY, EVERYONE. WELCOME TO THE DURHAM PLANNING COMMISSION. GOOD TO HAVE YOU RIGHT HERE THIS EVENING. THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE DURHAM PLANNING PAYMENT HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AS WELL AS THE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AS AN BOARD OF ADVISERS TO THE CHOSEN OFFICIALS. YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT THE CHOSEN OFFICIALS HAVE THE LAST SAY ON ANY CONCERN PRIOR TO United States TONIGHT. IF YOU WANTED TO SPEAK ON AN SCHEDULE ITEM TONIGHT, PLEASE MOST LIKELY TO THE TABLE TO MY LEFT AS WELL AS INDICATION UP TO SPEAK. FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT DESIRED TO SPEAK, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ALSO YOUR ADDRESS PLAINLY WHEN YOU INVOLVE THE PODIUM. PLEASE SPEAK CLEARLY AND RIGHT INTO THE MICROPHONE. EACH SIDE– THOSE SPEAKING IN SUPPORT OF AN ITEM AS WELL AS THOSE SPEAKING AGAINST AN PRODUCT– WILL HAVE TEN MINS TO PRESENT FOR EACH SIDE. FINALLY, ALL ACTIVITIES ARE STATED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE SO IF A MOTION STOPS WORKING OR CONNECTIONS, THE SUGGESTION IS FOR DENIAL.FINALLY, TONIGHT, YOU'' LL SEE AT THE EXTREMELY END WE HAVE TWO PRODUCTS THAT ARE INFORMATIONAL-ONLY THINGS. WE'' LL BE OBTAINING A PRESENTATION ON THIS PRODUCT TONIGHTING AND COMMISSIONERS WILL HAVE TIME TO ASK QUESTIONS OR DEAL ANY REMARKS, BUT THOSE THINGS WILL CERTAINLY BE COMING BACK AT A FUTURE CONFERENCE WHERE THERE WILL CERTAINLY BE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC INPUT. IF THOSE ARE THINGS THAT PASSION YOU, WE'' RE GLAD YOU ' RE RIGHT HERE THIS EVENING TO OBTAIN THE INFO WITH US BUT WE MOTIVATE YOU TO FIND BACK AT A FUTURE CONFERENCE TO OFFER YOUR PUBLIC COMMENTS. MANY THANKS ONCE MORE FOR COMING. MAY WE HAVE ROLL CALL, PLEASE? [ROLL PHONE CALL] >> > > COMMISSIONER SATTERFIELD IS EXCUSED. >> > > COMMISSIONER BAKE EMERGENCY ROOM HAS TO DO WITH 15 MINS LATE; HE'' LL BE BELOW. >> > CAN WE HAVE A MOTION TO FORMALLY E JUSTIFICATION COMMISSIONER SATTERFIELD. >> > > SO MOVED >>. >> > > SECONDLY. > > APPROPRIATELY MOVED AND ALSO SECONDED. ALL IN FAVOR PLEASE SAY AYE.ANY OPPOSED?
WE'' LL SEE TO IT WE RECOGNIZE COMMISSIONER BAKER WHEN HE ARRIVES. AUTHORIZATION OF THE MINUTES AND ALSO UNIFORMITY STATEMENTS FROM NOVEMBER 13TH, 2018, CONFERENCE. COMMISSIONER SALT WATER. >> > > I HAVE MINOR CORRECTION TO THE MINTES. AT NOVEMBER MEETING, LAURA WOODS PROVIDED THE EXAMINATION AS WELL AS EVALUATION RECORDS AS WELL AS SCOTT WHITEMAN GAVE US AN UPDATE AND NEITHER ONE OF TOSE PERSONNEL MEMBERS ARE DETAILED UNDER TEAM EXISTING. >> > > THAT ' S NOTED. THANKS FOR THOSE. >> > > ANY OTHER ADJUSTMENTS TO THE MINUTES OR THE UNIFORMITY STATEMENTS? >> > > I HAVE A COMMENT. I THINK IT'' S ALREADY BEEN SOMEWHAT CORRECTED BUT I AS GOING TO SUGGEST THAT COMMISSIONER DURKIN'' S NAME– SHE DESERVES An AREA TO HER OWN, BUT FO THE PAST, OH, COUPLE MONTHS, SHE'' S BEEN PROVIDED NEXT TO– FIRE. SHE'' S BEEN NOTED BESIDE THE CHAIRMAN, BUT I SEE– >> > >'WE ' LL PAY ATTENTION TO THAT, THANK YOU. WE'' LL MAKE CERTAIN WE'DON ' T DO THAT IN THE FUTURE. >> > > ALL. > > ANY OTHER CHANGES? MOVE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES AS WELL AS CONSISTENCY STATEMENTS AS AMENDED. >> > > SECOND >>. > > RELOCATED AND ALSO SECONDED. ALL THOSE IN SUPPORT, PLEASE SAY AYE.ANY OPPOSED?
FANTASTIC. MOTION PASSES WITH ONE VOICE. BEFORE WE OBTAIN TO ANY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE AGENDA, I DID INTEND TO TAKE A MINUTE AND ALSO WELCOME NEWEST COMMISSIONER, DAVID MORGAN. THIS IS HIS FIRST MEETING SO WELCOME ABOARD AND, DAVID, AS YOU RECOGNIZE, THIS IS OUR DECEMBER CONFERENCE. YOU ACTUALLY APPEARED WHEN IT WAS CANCELLED BECAUSE OF BAD WEATHER SO WE ADMIRE YOUR DEDICATION. YOU'' RE WELCOME TO HAVE THE FLOOR AS WELL AS MAKE ANY WELCOMING REMARKS.
>> > > JUST WISHED TO SAY I REJOICED TO BE ON THE BOARD AND EAGERLY ANTICIPATE OFFERING WITH Y'' >> ALL. > > THANKS SIGNIFICANTLY. >> > ANY CHANGES TO TONIGHT'' S PROGRAM? >> > COMMISSIONER, TEAM HAS NO ADJUSTMENT TO THE AGENDA. WE WOULD LIKE TO INCLUDE THAT ALL LAWFUL DEMANDS HAVE BEEN CARRIED OUT BASED ON STATE AND ALSO CITIZEN LAW FOR NOTIFY KIEGSS AS WELL AS THOSE SWORN STATEMENTS ON FILE IN THE PREPARING DEPARTMENT. >> > > GREAT. THANKS SIGNIFICANTLY. COMMISSIONER SALT WATER. >> > > SCHEDULE AS PRSENT ARED, MOVED. >> > > SECONDLY >>. > > MOTION AS WELL AS SECONDLY. ALL THOSE IN SUPPORT, PLEASE SAY AYE. FANTASTIC. TONIGHT WE HAVE 3 ZONING MAP ADJUSTMENTS AS WELL AS AFTER THAT WE HAVE OUR TWO DETAILS ITEMS. POINTER, WE'' LL REUNITE ON TUESDAY WHICH IS REGULAR CONFERENCE. THIS IS CONFERENCE TO OFFSET DECEMBER 11th Conference THAT WE CANCELLED BECAUSE OF SNOW.FIRST PRODUCT IS: 7.
PUBLIC HEARING: ZONING MAP ADJUSTMENT. 7. I. Z1800024 KINGS CHILDREN INN. REPORT.TART WITH THE STAFF- ONCE AGAIN, IF YOU WANT AUTHORIZING UP TO TALK ON ANY OF THESE ITEMS, PLEASE DO SO. > > GOOD EVENING. I ' LL BE OFFERING >> Z 1800024 KI KINGS'DAUGHTERS INN. APPLICANT IS COLIN CROSSMAN. THIS.603 ACRES WEBSITE IS LOW CAUGHTED 204 NORTH BUCHANAN BOULEVARD WITHIN STATE LIMITS. CANDIDATE ADJUSTMENT FROM RU 5 AND RUM TO RUM, NO GROWTH STRATEGY ASSOCIATED. P RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IS DESIGNATED TOOL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP. THE WEBSITE ADJOINS MULTIFAMILY AS WELL AS SINGLE FAMILY MEMBERS USES AND DUKE UNIVERSITY IS LOCATED TO THE WEST. CANDIDATE SUGGESTS TO ALTER RU 5 AS WELL AS RUM ZONING TO RUM. HOME DESIGNATED TOOL RESIDENTIAL CONSTANT WITH ZONING REZONING DEMAND. DIMENSIONAL INTERPRETATION HERE, MAXIMUM DENSITY 12 UNITS PER ACRE. MINIMUM STREET BACKYARD FIVE FEET, FIVE YARD 8 FEET AND REAR AT 20 FEET. RUM CURRENT DESIGNATION– ON FUTURE LAND USAGE MAP AS WELL AS RELEVANT POLICIES. CONSTANT WITH POLICIES 2.3.1 A AS PROPOSED RUM ZONING IS NEARBY TO SAME RUM ZONING. 2.3.2 A EXISTING FROM STRUCTURE SUFFICE TO FIT. FURTHER INFORMATION OFFERED IN RECORD. STAFF DETERMINE THIS IS DEMAND IS REGULAR WITH THOROUGH PLAN AND OTHER PLANS AND ORDINANCES.AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. > > THANK YOU. AT THIS FACTOR, WE ' LL STEP TO OPEN THE GENERAL PUBLIC HEARING AS WELL AS WE HAVE TWO PEOPLE THAT ARE SUBSCRIBED TO TALK. IN> FAVOR, MR. DANIEL JEWELL. AGAINST OR ASKING FOR A CONTINUATION AS IT SAYS BELOW IS STACY MURPHY. EACH SIDE WILL CERTAINLY HAVE 10 MINS. GEPSZING WER NOT GOING NEED THAT MUCH. > > MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE, DANIEL JEWELL, I ' M GOING TO ALLOW MS. MURPHY FIRST MAKE HER REQUEST AS WELL AS JUST TO LET YOU KNOW, I ' M RIGHT HERE >> ON BEHALF OF THE CANDIDATE AS WELL AS WE ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH THE DEMAND THAT SHE ' S CONCERNING TO MAKE. > > THANK YOU. > > STACY MURPHY. BOARD MET 3 TIMES TO REVIEW THIS ISSUE. ONE IN DCEMBER MEETING SOME CONCERNED NEIGHBORS BROUGHT IT TO OUR >> ATTENTION, >> THEN WE HAD A SNOWSTORM AS WELL AS SUB COMMITTEE MET WITH DETAILS, THEN HOLLY UH DAYS, AND ALSO ONE POINT THE BOARD [INDISCERNIBLE] IT WAS A DIFFICULT PROPERTY FIGURE OUT ALL THE VARIOUS PROBLEMS. SOME SPECIFIC COVENANTS ON THE DEED OF SALE WITH THAT SAID RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY THAT PROVIDES DEFENSE. THERE ' S A HISTORIC SPOTS DEMARCATION WHICH USED LIMITATIONS, AFTER THAT THERE ' S ZONING MODIFICATIONS WHICH OPENS UP AND AUH LEAVEUATES ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE PROSPECTIVE SALE OF THIS PROPERTY.IT ' S A CHALLENGING CONCERNS. I ASSUME THE BOARD IS'[ INDISCERNIBLE] UNDERSTANDING DUE TO COMPLICATED CONCERN AND ALSO WE HAVE THE SNOWSTORM AS WELL AS THE HOLIDAY UHS, WE SEEM LIKE IT'WOULD BE BETTER FOR EVERY PERSON IF THERE ' S EVEN MORE TIME FOR THE AREA AND ALSO MEDIATE NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBORS TO OBTAIN ADITIONAL UNDERSTANDING AND ALSO UNDERSTAND HOW ALL THESE THREE VARIOUS RESTRICTS QUALITIES WITH EACH OTHER, AS WELL AS I UH FEEL CONFIDENT THAT IF A 30-DAY CONTINUANCE WAS ATTAINED THAT WE COULD OBTAIN THAT UNDERSTANDING AS WELL AS IN A BETTER SETTING, SO. > > FANTASTIC. THANK YOU. > > DANIEL JEWELL REPRESENTING CANDIDATES, WE REMAIN IN AGREEMENT WITH A ONE-CYCLE CONTINUANCE FOR THE NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBORS TO HAVE MORE DISCUSSION. ALSO CONCERN FOR THE COMMISSION. WE CANISTER MAKE THE RESTRICTIVE COMMITMENTS AVAILABLE AT THE NEXT MEETING IF> YOU WISH TO SEE THOSE. THOSE TO NAME A FEW THINGS STOP THE TAKING DOWN OF THE EXISTING HISTORIC BUILDING AND LIKEWISE WOULD NOT PERMIT ANY UNDERGRADUATE HOUSING IN THE STRUCTURE, SO WE CANISTER PROVIDE THOSE IF IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO SEE THOSE. > > I THINK UH IT ' S ALWAYS EXCELLENT TO HAVE MORE DETAILS AS WELL AS YOU CAN PROBABLY DEAL WITH TEAM AS WELL AS THEY CONTAINER COMMUNICATE THAT INFORMATION TO US AS APPROPRIATE. > > PLEASED TO DO THAT, THANK YOU. > > MANY THANKS BOTH VERY MUCH. ANY PERSON ELSE WHO WISH TO TALK THIS EVENING. THIS IS THE KINGS'LITTLE GIRL INN INSTANCE. BEFORE WE PROGRESS, I WOULD SIMPLY WANT TO SIGN IN WITH PERSONNEL AND ALSO I INTEND TO CLEAR UP, TIS IS A LITTLE ONE-OF-A-KIND AS I CLAIMED
>> EARLIER, WE ' RE MEETING AGAIN ON TUESDAY, SO WE ' RE TALKING ABOUT CONTINUING THIS UNTIL FEBRUARY 12TH MEETING SO WE ' RE ALL ON THE EXACT SAME WEB PAGE. > > WE WERE GOING TO SUGGEST YOU TAKE IT TO THAT MEETING AND NOT TO TUESDAY. [LAUGHTER] > > DO I NEED TO'INSPECT ON THE PROCEDURES?'SO WE WISH TO MAKE SURE WE KEEP THIS PUBLIC HEARING OPEN? > > CONTINUE IT UNTIL THE DATE PARTICULAR WHICH WOULD BE FEBRUARY 12TH AS WELL AS MR. MILLER WISH TO ADD. > > PRIOR TO WE BALLOT, IT OCCURRED TO ME WHILE THE TRINITY UH PARK FOLKS WERE MAKING DISCUSSION, SHE DISCUSSED HIS TORQUE PRESERVATION COMMITMENTS WHICH ARE NOT ZONING MATTERS AS WELL AS I THINK THE OWNERS >> OF THIS HOME HAVE APPROVED COVENANTS TO PRESERVATION DURHAM, AND THAT BEING THE SITUATION, I BELIEVED IT> FAIR TO REVEAL TO EVERY ONE OF YOU AND ALSO TO THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE CONCERNED WITH THIS MATTER THAT I UH CURRENTLY SIT ON THE BOARD OF PRESERVATION DURHAM WHICH IS THE ORGANIZATION, WHICH I BELIEVE, HAS THIS COVENANT.ACTION COULD BE TAKEN BY THE AN -INTENDING PAYMENT OR ULTIMATELY THE COMMON COUNCIL WITH REGARD TO THE ZONING OF THIS HOME WOULD AFFECT THOSE COMMITMENTS BUT I DID THINK IT– AS WELL AS I WEAR ' T THINK I ' M REQUIRED BY THE RULES AFTER KONS L TERMINAL WITH STAFF F TO RECUSE MYSELF AS A RESULT OF THIS LINK, BUT I UH THINK IT WAS ONLY FAIR OF CAUTION THAT I MAKE DISLOSURE TO YOU TO MAKE SURE THAT IN TIME YOU CAN STEP MY COMMENTS RECOGNIZING I ' M GOTTEN IN TOUCH WITH THE COMPANY THAT HAS CONNECTION TO OUR RATE OF INTEREST IN THIS RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY P. > > WONDERFUL. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR REMARKS? COMMISSIONER BRINE. > > I WAS JUST GOING TO MAKE A MOVEMENT THE IF YOU ' RE READY? > > I THINK WE ARE. > > I MOVE WE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ALSO CONTINUE THE ISSUE UP UNTIL FEBRUARY 12TH CONSULTING WITH THE COMMISSION. > >'SECOND. > > MOVED BY COMMISSIONER SALT WATER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HORNBUCKLE. WE ' LL HAVE A ROLL PHONE CALL BALLOT. [ROLL CALL BALLOT] MOTION PASSES 11-0. > > THANKS. >> WE APPRECIATE REQUIRING TIME TO WORK THIS PROVIDE OUT AND WE ' LL SEE YOU ON FEBRUARY 12TH. >> I SIMPLY WISHED TO MAKE CERTAIN WE RECOGNIZE COMMISSIONER JOHNSON– GOD GOOD TO HAVE YOU RIGHT HERE. > > WE ' LL RELOCATE TO NEXT ITEM. >> 7. >> II. Z1800026 HALE ROAD DUPLEX. WE ' LL START WITH THE SAFF RECORD. > >'PRODUCTS NIGHT. CHA VEZ WITH INTENDING DEPARTMENT PRESENTING Z 1800026 HALE STREET DUPLEX. THE CANDIDATE IS MARTIN McFARLING,.345 ACRE WEBSITE SITUATED AT 1020 HALE ROAD COMPRISED OF 2 WHOLE LOTS. SITUATED WITHIN THE CITY UH BOUNDARY. CANDIDATE SUGGESTS TO CHANGE ZONING FROM RU 5 TO RU 52. >> NO'ADVANCEMENT PAN SURROUNDING THIS REQUEST.PROPERTY [INDISCERNIBLE]> FUTURE LAND USE MAP CONSISTENT WITH ZONING DEMAND. RU 52 PERMITS [INDISTINCT] WHICH WOULD ENABLE EXISTING DUE FLOEKS BECOME CONFORMING AND BEGINNING DISADVANTAGE FEATURE OF NEW DUPLEX ON 141. THE SITE IS SHOWN IN RED LOCATED OFF OF HALE STREET WITHIN OLD WEST DURHAM COMMUNITY SECURITY OVERLAY AND IN URBAN TIER. ONE AND ALSO 2 SHOWS EXISTING WEBSITE CONDITIONS. 139 HAS DUPLEX FRAMEWORKS AS WELL AS 141 IS VACANT. SITE BESIDE SOLITARY HOUSEHOLD AND ALSO RESIDENTIAL MAKES USE OF. THE CANDIDATE RECOMMENDS TO ALTER RU 5 ZONING TO RU 52. THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IS ASSIGNED RESIDENTIAL ON FUTURE LAND USE MAP WHICH FOLLOWS REZONING DEMAND. RU 52 ZONING ARE DETERMINED BY REAL ESTATE KIND AS IDENTIFIED IN UDO 7.1. AS SITE PLAN WITHIN OLD WEST DURHAM COMMUNITY DEFENSE OVERLAY IT ' S SUJECT TO THEIR CRITERIA INCLUDING WALK LOCATION 12,000 SQUARE FEET, MEANTIME WITH50 FEET. ELEVATION, 26 FEET, FLOORING AREA PROPORTION 12.325. THE RECOMMENDED RU 52 ZONING CLASSIFICATION CONSISTS OF WITH TOOL THICKNESS RESIDENCE DEN ON FUTURE LAND USAGE MAP [INDISTINCT] AS WELL AS CONSISTENT WITH PLAN 2.31 A AS PROPOSED RU 5 # ZONING ADJOINS EXISTING RU 52 ZONING AS WELL AS EXISTING DUPLEX STRUCTURES.EFFECTIVE 2.8.2 A EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE SUCH AS [INDISCERNIBLE] SUFFICE PROSPECTIVE IMPACT. MORE DETAILS OFFERED INSONNING MAP CHANGE REPORT. TEAM ESTABLISHES THIS DEMAND IS REGULAR WITH THOROUGH STRATEGY AND OTHER PLANS An AS WELL AS ORDINANCES. STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR AN QUESTIONS. > > THANK YOU. WE H TRANSFER TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AS WELL AS WE HAVE THREE INDIVIDUALS JOINED TO TALK.
MARTY UH McFARLING IN FAVOR AND TWO OPPOSED: JOE ARLG HOUSE AND WILLIAM WHIT MOORE.EACH SIDE WILL CERTAINLY HAVE 10 MINUTES, TOTAL AMOUNT. > > GOOD EVENING. MARTY McFARLING IN GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA THOUGH I DID MATURE IN DURHAM AND USED TO LIVE AT 1020 HALE STREET. I ASSUME E THE PROPOSAL IS CLEAR WHAT I ' M ASKING FOR. >> CURRENTLY, THERE ' S A DUPLEX BEHIND MY BUILDING. MY PROPERTY PRESENTLY HAS ONE DUPLEX ON ONE WHOLE LOT WHICH IS NON-CONFORMING, THAT WAS DONE 1959. THE OTHER GREAT DEAL HAS BEEN VACANT EVERY SINCE SURVEYED IN 1911, NEVER BEEN BUILT ON. BASICALLY THERE ' S THREE REASON ARES THAT I ' M COMING TO THE CITY TO PERFORM THIS. TOP IS TO CORRECT THE NON-CONFORMING STATUS OF EXISTING DUPLEX THAT ' S RESTING THERE. IF THAT DUPLEX WERE TO EARN MORE THAN'50 %, OLD WEST DURHAM [INDISTINCT] I COULD RESTORE SOLITARY FAMILY WITHOUT– I MAY BE ABLE TO OBTAIN DUPLEX REDONE BUT WHAT I UNDERSTAND FROM INTENDING INDIVIDUALS, THERE ' S A GREAT DEAL INCLUDED WITH ATTEMPTING TO PERFORM THAT AND ALSO GET VARIATIONS An AND WHATEVER ELSE WOULD NEED TO INVOLVED.SECOND FUNCTION FOR THIS, ON THE EMPTY WHOLE LOT IS TO SUPPLY A SINGLE FAMILY MEMBERS HOUSING YUN THAT ' S A DUPLEX FOR 97-YEAR-OLD DADDY'THAT PRESENTLY LIVES ON CARVER STREET. 3RD OBJECTIVE FOR THIS REQUEST IS THE GREATEST AND ALSO BEST USE AFTER POSSESSING THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY FOR OVER THIRTY YEARS. CITY WILL CERTAINLY ALLOW RU 5, 2 ZONING. RUM WOULD BE BETTER IN ALLOWING ME TO PUT A NICE-LOOKING DUPLEX UP WHICH REALLY [INDISTINCT] GETTING DETAILS TO THAT AND PLAT, BUT TO ACCOMPLISH THAT I WOULD HAE
TO TAKE APART THE EXISTING DUPLEX AND BASICALLY CONSTRUCT 4 PLEX IN THE CENTER OF BOTH GREAT DEAL WHICH IS YOU ' RE SPINNING YOUR WHEELS DOING THAT. AS I WORK ON DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ACTUALLY OBTAIN THIS DONE COMPLY WITH OLD WEST DURHAM WHICH IS INTERESTING BUT I SEE HOW IT CAN BE DONE.BUT THAT ' S BASICALLY, YES, ANY QUESTIONS [INDISCERNIBLE] SAVE MY TIME FOR REPLY IF THAT ' S POSSIBLE. > > THAT ' S FAIR. > > OKAY. > > MANY THANKS VERY MUCH. MR. ARLGHOUSE AND WHITMOORE YOU HAVE COMPLETE OF TEN MINUTES IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO USAGE THAT. > > EXCELLENT NIGHT, I ' M JOE ARLGHOUSE, I LIVE AT 1019 HALE ROAD WHICH IS IS DIRECTLY NEARBY FROM THE HOME IN QUESTION. I AM AGAINST TRANSFORMING THE ZONING. I HAVE SOME NEIGHBORS THAT HAVE LIVED THERE FOR SEVERAL YEARS, AND ALSO THE DUPLEXES', ESPECIALLY THE DUPLEX AE CROSS THE ROAD FROM ME– INDIVIDUAL ARE TRANSIENTS. THERE THEY ' RE MAYBE A YEAR >> APPROXIMATELY'AND THEN >> WE GET >> SOMEONE ELSE. IN TERMS OF THE ESTHETICS AND THE TOP QUALITY OF LIFE FOR ME SINCE I ' M LOOKING FROM MY> LIVING AREA STRAIGHT AT THE BUILDING IN CONCERN, AND ALSO IN REQUISITES OF STRUCTURE NEIGHBORHOOD AREA, IT WOULD BE MUCH MUCH BETTER IF WE HAD CONSTANTLY MORE SOLITARY FAMILY RESIDENCES OCCUPIED BY THE OWNERS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.THAT ' S IDEALLY WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE. UM, I BELIEVE THAT WOULD CONSIDERABLY ENHANCE THE LIFESTYLE AND ALSO I DO FRET ABOUT THE WHAT MAY BE BUILT THERE SINCE I ' VE SEEN A LOT OF HOUSES, LOTS OF WHICH HAVE BEEN BUILT BY JEFF MONSEEN THAT ARE QUITE BIG AND ALSO LED United States IN THE COMMUNITY TO ASSEMBLE THE MPO THAT WAS PRIMARILY VALIDATED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL, SO, UM, WE ' LL SEE WHAT THE CITY CHOOSES, BUT I THINK THE SINGLE HOUSEHOLD E RESIDENCES INHABITED BY OWNERS IS THE FINEST REMEDY TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. > > THANKS.
MR. WHITMOORE. > > 2101 EVENLY OPPORTUNITY, WHICH IS THE PROPERTY BEHIND THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IN QUESTION. I UH THINK THE STREET IN OUR COMMUNITY IS A MIX BEWEEN DUPLEXES AND ALSO SINGLE HOUSEHOLD REAL ESTATE, AS WELL AS AT SOME TIME WE HAVE A DUPLEX ON THE WHOLE LOT ALONGSIDE THAT, THERE ' S ONE ACROSS, THERE ' S A HOUSE THAT ' S BESIDE THAT AND ALSO FEATURES AS A DUPLEX, AND ALSO AFTER THAT BEHIND HERE THERE ARE TWO OTHER DUPLEXES, SO ANOTHER PERSON ROCKY DEVELOPMENT THE METHOD THE ZONING IS THERE, DEVELOPING TURN SPLITTING IT AS WELL AS DEVELOPING IT BUT I PREFERRED TO IT STAY THE WAY IT ' S INITIALLY ZONED AS WELL AS >> BE A SINGLE FAMILY.INCREASE THE [INDISTINCT] THERE UH BUT ALSO KEEP THE NEIGHBORHOOD PERSONALITY THE SAME. SO THANK YOU. > > THANK YU. MR. McFARING, YOU HAVE ADDED TIME. WHEN WE CLOSE THE GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT DURATION THE COMMISSIONERS MAY HAVE DIRECT QUESTIONS, THEY MAY ASK YOU SPCIFIC QUESTIONS THEY MAY NOT, BUT SIMPLY SO YOU ' RE READY. > > MANY THANKS. I ' VE OWNED THAT RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY SINCE THE MID 80s. THE PHOTO REVEALS IT ' S KEPT UP RATHER WELL. I BELIEVE I ' M A LANDLORD IN SO MUCH AS HAVING AFFORD B HOUSING THAT THE ONE
BEDROOM SYSTEM RENTS FOR 800, TWOROOM RAENT RENTS FOR 1050 A MONTH.THE TRUTH THAT I IDEALLY WILL TO THE EMPTY WHOLE LOT WHICH ALREADY-HAS A DUPLEX BEHIND IT AND >> AFTER THAT THE JEND LMAN, JOE, HAS A DUPLEX RIGHT CLOSE TO HIM THAT ' S THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE LOT OR THROUGHOUT IF ROAD FROM THE EXISTING DUPLEX THAT I CARRY THE LOT. HIS RESIDENCE IS ACROSS FROM THE VACANT WHOLE LOT. I ' M TRYING TO >> SUPPLY SOMETHING HERE FOR MY DADDY, AS WELL AS LATER IN HIS LIFE FOR HIS TOP QUALITY OF LIFE, AND AFTER THAT'WHEN MY DADDY IS NO MORE ON THIS PLANET, THERE ' S GOING TO BE A GREAT DUPLEX HOUSE SYSTEM THERE THAT I WILL CERTAINLY POSSIBLY RESIDE IN UNTIL THE DAY I DIE. BY THE METHOD, THERE '
S [INDISCERNIBLE] PROBABLY BE AROUND FAR WHILE, SO I NEED An AREA TO LIVE. THAT ' S THE MAIN THING IS HAVING SOMETHING LIKE THAT AVAILABLE AND AS WE CANISTER SEE, SINCE IT ' S THE SAME METHOD WITH EVERYTHING ELSE BECAUSE COMMUNITY, RESIDENCES OBTAIN BETTER AND ALSO IT FIX THE REAL ESTATE TIPS SHING TO CONTINUE OLD WEST DURHAM OR RA ARE, SO TO SPEAK.RENTAL UNITS ARE SHORT-TERM SINCE THE MAJORITY OF I DEAL WITH ARE DUKE COLLEGE STUENTS. IT IS A LITTLE TRANSIENT BUT OVERALL,'MY OBJECTIVE AS A PROPERTY MANAGER IS TRY TO KEEP RENTAL OCCUPANT THERE AS LONG AS POSSIBLE. I HAVE ONE THT ' S GOING TO BE IN FOR A MONTH'. I PUT ON ' T LIKE TO HAVE EMPTY UNITS. IN REGARDS TO BE ABLE TO BRING EVEN MORE HOUSING SUPPLY TO OLD WEST DURHAM WHICH FRANTICALLY NEEDS IT, I OFFER THAT AT RATHER AFFORDABLE RATE CONSIDERING THAT I WAS ABLE TO PURCHASE THOSE PIPES 30 YEARS EARLIER AT A REALISTIC RATE, , YOU UNDERSTAND, I REALLY FEEL REALLY STRONGLY IN FAVOR OF THIS.I ' M SORER RI THAT MY 2 NEIGHBORS HAVE SOME TROUBLES WITH IT.
I ANTICIPATE VARIOUS OTHER NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBORS IN THE COMMUNITY AS WELL AS THEY DO NOT HAVE An ISSUE WITH IT WHATSOEVER. ANY INQUIRIES, I ' LL MORE THAN HAPPY TO SOLUTION SOME. > > THANK YOU. ANY INDIVIDUAL ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO TALK O THIS? I WEAR ' T SEE ANYBODY ELSE SO WE ' LL CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING AS WELL AS ANY INQUIRY OS COMMENTS FROM FELLOW COMMISSIONERS? COMMISSIONER JOHNSON. > > THANK YOU. EXCUSE MY DELAY. I HAVE SEVERAL QUESTIONS BUT I ' LL ASK ONE IN WISHES THAT MY COLLEAGUES WILL CERTAINLY WITH ANY LUCK I INCREASE THE OTHER ONES. FOR BOTH GENTLEMEN THAT ARE IN P RESISTANCE, WOULD YOU UH MIND– ONE OR BOTH– CONCERNING THE MICROPHONE.I ' M WONDERING THE IF YOU ' LL REPLY TO WHAT ARE YOUR IDEAS ON THE FUTURE LAND USAGE MAP WHICH HAS THIS ENTIRE COMMUNITY DESIGNATED FOR MEDIUM THICKNESS RESIDENTIAL GIVEN >> YOUR ISSUES ABOUT THE SHORT-TERM NATURE ON THE ZONING MAP IF YOU ' RE NOT A RESIDENCE PROPRIETOR, THERE'' S EVEN MORE TRANSIENT-TYPE HABITS. FUTURE LAND USAGE MAP HAS MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL AS CLASSIFICATION, THAT, TO ME APPEARS THAT WOULD INTRODUCE EVEN MORE TRANSIENT-TYPE RESIDENCE OF THIS AREA. > > SOLITARY HOUSEHOLD ZONING PART OF THAT STRATEGY? ISN ' T SINGLE HOUSEHOLD COMPONENT OF THAT STRATEGY? I ' M FOR THE WHOLE LOT BEING SPLIT AND ALSO An ANOTHER PERSON HOUSE BEING BUILD THERE, I PREFERRED TO LITTLE BIT A SOLITARY FAMILY HOME INSTEAD OF
DUPLEX WHICH IS EVEN MORE LIKELY TO HAVE SOMEBODY BUY IT.I LIKE INDIVIDUALS UPCOMING AN GOING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. STRONG BECAUSE WE HAVE An EXCELLENT MIX IN BETWEEN SINGLE HOUSEHOLD AS WELL AS OTHER REIN LEASINGS as well as talls AND ALSO– I WEAR ' T THINK YOU OBTAIN THAT A LOT MORE PEOPLE IN THERE BECAUSE IT ' S A DUPLEX. DUPLEX MIGHT HAVE THREE INDIVIDUALS IN THERE AND ALSO A FAMILY WILL HAVE TWO ADULT AND ALSO 3 YOUNGSTERS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. NOT LIKE YOU ' RE GETTING MORE PEOPLE IN THERE AFTER YOU CREATE THE GREAT DEAL. >> IF YOU WEAR ' T DEVELOP THE GREAT DEAL– >'> QUICK FOLLOW-UP TO REMARKS. BASED ON MY UNDERSTANDING, FUTURE LAND USE MAP HAS IT MED YUM THICKNESS RESIDENTIAL WHICH PERMITS 6-12 HOUSE SYSTEMS PER ACRE, SO WITH THIS PROPOSALING RIGHT HERE, THAT COMPUTES TO AROUND 2-4 HOME DEVICES THAT COULD BE ON THE SINGLE PART BASED ON FUTURE LAND KWUS.I ' M LOOKING AHEAD BASED COMMENTS THAT YOU TWO GENTLEMEN MADE. IN THAT SITUATION, YOU ARE GENERALLY 3 OR 4 INDIVIDUALS WON ' T BE HOMEOWNERS ON 3.45 ACRE WHOLE LOT. SEEMS TO GO AGAINST-APPEARS TO CONTRAST THE OPPOSITION THINGS YOU MADE SO I ' M WONDERING IF YOU ' RE SEEING THIS AS A POSSIBLE CONCERN FOR YOUR COMMUNITY BASED ON THE REQUEST TONIGHT. [. CROSS TALK]>. > > NEIGHBORHOOD BEING ELEVATED TO INCREASE THICKNESS THERE.THE RESIDENCE THAT ' S THERE IS GOING KEEP THERE. > > THAT ' S A PRESUMPTION, BUT I COULD ENTER INTO YOUR AREA, BUY A BUILDING FOR WHATEVER REASON ARE, AND ALSO KNOCK IT DOWN OR IT REFUTES OR SOMETHING HAPPENS AND I'COULD COME PRIOR TO PAYMENT AS WELL AS KWUZ THIS FUTURE LAND USAGE MAP AS A METHOD TO GO FROM SINGLE HOUSEHOLD HOMEOWNER TO An EVEN MORE THICK USAGE WITH MY REDEVELOPMENT. I ' M WONDERING, IF YOU 2 TAKEN THAT REALITY INTO ACCOUNT? > > ASK FO ZONING ADJUSTMENT AND ALSO'THAT ' S WHERE WE WOULD DISCUSS WHAT EXISTED AS WELL AS WHAT WAS EXCELLENT FOR THE NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBOR HOORD.IT WOULD BE A POSSIBILITY, BUT, YOU KNOW, I MEAN >>, YOU KNOW. IT IS An OPPORTUNITY, BUT IT
' S NOT– YOU TIN ' T DO THIS EVEN IF YOU INTENDED TO. YOU ' RE GOING TO NEED TO GO THROUGH PAYMENT AND THE CITY BOARD AND COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION WILL BE INVOLVED AND EVERYBODY WILL SPEAK ABOUT WHAT ' S > > THANK YOU.HOOD. -> > THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER JOHNSON. COMMISSIONER AL-TURK. > > MANY THANKS. I WOULD ASK IF FOLKS ARE HAVING SIDE DISCUSSIONS, IT ' S DIFFICULT TO LISTEN TO UP RIGHT HERE. YOU ' RE WELCOME TO GO INTO TH HALL IF IT ' S GOING BE A LOUD DISADVANTAGE VER. THAT'WOULD ALLOW United States TO HEAR THE CONVERSATION. THANKS. > > I ' M GENERALLY
ON BEHALF OF THIS REQUEST. I THINK E THAT HAVING A DUPLEX ON THIS.172 ACRE LOT MAKES A GREAT DEAL OF SENSE. COMMUNITY, YOU TALK ABOUT NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER.I THINK RIGHT NOW, MY GUESS IS A GREAT DEAL OF OLD WEST DURHAM, MAYBE MAJORITY HAVE DUPLEXES, BUT A WHOLE LOT DO, RIGHT?
>> > > GOOD AFTERNOON, EVERY PERSON. > > DANIEL JEWELL REPRESENTING APPLICANTS, WE ARE IN CONTRACT WITH A ONE-CYCLE CONTINUATION FOR THE NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBORS TO HAVE MORE CONVERSATION. > > WE WERE GOING TO SUGGEST YOU TAKE IT TO THAT MEETING AND ALSO NOT TO TUESDAY. > > CONTINUE IT UNTIL THE DAY PARTICULAR WHICH WOULD BE FEBRUARY 12TH AND MR. MILLER WANT TO ADD. > > BEFORE WE VOTE, IT HAPPENED TO ME WHILE THE TRINITY UH PARK FOLKS WERE MAKING DISCUSSION, SHE DISCUSSED HIS TORQUE CONSERVATION COMMITMENTS WHICH ARE NOT ZONING MATTERS AS WELL AS I BELIEVE THE OWNERS >> OF THIS RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY HAVE PROVIDED COVENANTS TO CONSERVATION DURHAM, AND THAT BEING THE INSTANCE, I THOUGHT IT> FAIR TO DIVULGE TO ALL OF YOU AS WELL AS TO THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE WORRIED WITH THIS ISSUE THAT I UH CURRENTLY SIT ON THE BOARD OF CONSERVATION DURHAM WHICH IS THE COMPANY, WHICH I BELIEVE, HAS THIS COVENANT.ACTION COULD BE TAKEN BY THE AN -INTENDING PAYMENT OR ULTIMATELY THE CITY COUNCIL WITH RESPECT TO THE ZONING OF THIS HOME WOULD AFFECT THOSE COVENANTS BUT I DID THINK IT– AND I DON ' T THINK I ' M REQUIRED BY THE RULES AFTER KONS L TERMINAL WITH STAFF F TO RECUSE MYSELF BECAUSE OF THIS CONNECTION, BUT I UH THINK IT WAS ONLY FAIR OF CARE THAT I MAKE DISLOSURE TO YOU SO THAT IN TIME YOU CAN STEP MY COMMENTS UNDERSTANDING I ' M CONNECTED WITH THE ORGANIZATION THAT HAS LINK TO OUR PASSION IN THIS HOME P. > > FANTASTIC.> > THAT ' S CORRECT. > > AS MUCH AS WE KNOW, YES. > > YOU MIGHT COME RIGHT INTO THE MICROPHONE SIMPLY FOR INDIVIDUALS AT HOME.
> > THANK YOU. > > THAT ' S CORRECT. > > YOU MIGHT COME RIGHT INTO THE MICROPHONE SIMPLY FOR FOLKS AT HOME. > > COMMENTS FROM SOMEBODY OTHER THAN MR. MILLER BUT IF THERE ARE NONE I THINK I DIDN ' T OBTAIN WHAT I WAS HOPING TO GET BUT I HAVE ADEQUATE INFORMATION TO MAKE A DECISION. > > IF YOU ' RE READY, I ' LL MAKE A MOTION.THIS IS NO MORE AN STATUTE REQUIREMENT FOR PDRs. ADDITIONALLY, THE APPLICATION A CANT RECOMMENDS TO REMOVE NUMBER 10 AND 11 AS WELL AS CHANGE KEEP IN MIND 12. LINKS TO BRAGG ROADWAY AND ALSO MANNIX ROAD ARE NOT REQUIRED TO MEET EXTERNAL ACCESSIBILITY SPECIFICATIONS. MESSAGE DEDICATION HAS BEEN ADDED LIMITING VARIETY OF UNITS TO # 0 SYSTEMS EAST OF ARDSLEY DRIVE. NO ADJUSTMENTS ARING WITH PROPOSED TO THE REMAINDER OF THE AUTHORIZED ADVANCEMENT PLAN. PER THE UDO, ANY UH REVISIONS TO [INDISTINCT] COMPONENTS ARE THOUGHT ABOUT—-. SUGGESTED CHANGES AS NOTED HAVE BEEN EVALUATED BY PERSONNEL AS WELL AS DETERMINE TO BE REGULAR WITH THE UDO REQUIREMENTS.STAFF DETERMINES THAT THESE REQUESTS ARE REGULAR WITH DETAILED PLAN AS WELL AS OTHER POLICIES AND ALSO REGULATIONS. STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR INQUIRIES. > > MANY THANKS P. WE ' LL OPEN THE GENERAL PUBLIC >> HEARING ON THIS THING. WE HAVE ONE PERSON AUTHORIZED P UP IN SUPPORT. 4 INDIVIDUALS REGISTERED AGAINST, AND WE WILL ALLOW 10 MINS PER EACH SIDE. WE ' LL BEGINNING WITH THOSE IN FAVOR. THAT ' S DON SEVER. > > DON SEVER WITH SUMMIT LAYOUT AND WISH EVERYBODY A HAPPY BRAND-NEW YEAR. WE HAVE 2 ITEMS WE WANTED TO ADDRESS. ONE IS THE HIGHWAY CONNECTIONS. WITH THE INITIAL MESSAGE DEDICATION SHOWING LINK TO BRAGG ROAD AS WELL AS WHEN W ' RE LOOKING AT THE JOB IN MORE COMPLETE EXAMINATION THERE ' S SUBSTANTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTE STREAM BARRIER WITHIN THIS AREA AS WELL AS A WE WANT TO [INDISTINCT] THAT DEMAND TO CONNECT BRAGG ROADWAY BECAUSE OF THAT. > > SPEAK CLOSER INTO THE MICROPHONE? HAVING DIFFICULT TIME HEARING YOU
>>. > > BETTER? I WAS MENTIONING WITH BRAGG ROAD THERE ' S SUBSTANTIAL >> ENVIRONMENTAL FUNCTION BEING A STREAM AND ALSO WE WANT TO GET RID OF THE DMOIMENT MAKE THIS SPECIFIC LINK THE FOR ECOLOGICAL PURPOSES. ON THE EAST SIDE OF MANNIX ROAD, WE ALSO PREFER NOT TO RESTRICTION OURSELVES TO CONNECTING TO MANNIX ROAD BUT AS PERSONNEL HAD PLACE IN THEIR PARTICULAR REFERRAL AS WELL AS WE WOULD LIKE DO A DEDICATION THAT FOR A MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS TO 90 EAST OF ARDSLEY ROADWAY THAT WE ' LL MAKE A SECONDLY NEXT BUT WE WISHED TO GIVE US FLEXIBILITY OF MAKING LINK ROAD WE'WOULD JUST BE ABLE TO TAKE CARE OF THE AJAY E SENT BUILDING PROPRIETORS. IF WE MAKE CONNECTION TO MANNIX ROAD, THERE ' S NO RIGHT OF WAY DEVOTED TO CONNECTING THIS HOME TO NEW RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, SO WE ' RE'LOOKING AT JUST THE OPPORTUNITY OF RELOCATING IT TO DIFFERENT AREA IF WE'CAN DISCOVER AN APPROPRIATE REMEDY. THE SECOND ISSUE THAT WE ' RE TALKING ABOUT IS THE 50-FOOT BARRIERS THAT ARE ALONG THE PERIMETER. THIS SPECIFIC PARCEL HAS CHARMING– WELL, IT ' S THE OVERALL ADVANCEMENT IS LIMITED TO A 24 %MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS'LOCATION, AND ALSO OUR BOUNDARY INTENDS ARE SHOWING THAT AS WE TOTALLY DEVELOP OUR LOTS IN THE ROAD THAT THE OPTIMUM IMPERVIOUS COUNTING FOR IS ROUGHLY 60%. THERE ' S SUBSTANTIAL MARSH, CONSIDERABLE LOT OF FOR 100 YEAR FLOODING AIRPLANE THAT WE HAVE TO PREVENT. WITH NEW ENTRYWAY COMING OFF OF BURTON ROADWAY, 50-FOOT CHANGE BARRIER IS LIMITED ON IN WHICH WE CANISTER PUT THE LOTS AS WELL AS A STREET AND ALSO AVOID OF ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS, THE 100 FOOT STREAM BARRIER ALONG WITH 100 YER FLOOD PLANE. WE ' RE DECREASING 50 FOOT BARRIER TO WHAT ' S REQUIRED BY UDO, IT ' LL OFFER United States EVEN MORE ADAPTABILITY TO PROPERLY LOCATE THOSE GREAT DEALS ALONG FRONTAGE. ALSO ISSUE THAT AS WE THIS SPECIFIC PARCEL IS DOWN STREAM OF THE NEARBY PARCELS BEING ARDSLEY IN AND ALSO ALONG MANNIX ORIGINAL COMMITMENT CHATTING CONCERNING A 50-FOOT UNDISTURBED BUFFER AND ALSO WE ' D LIKE TO ELIMINATE THAT DEMAND SO WE UNDERSTAND WE ' RE GOING TO HAVE TO MANAGE OFF-SITE WATER DRAINAGE CONCERNS AS WELL AS ALLOWING US TO COME UP WITH'FLEXIBILITY OF TRESPASSING BECAUSE 50-FOOT LOCATION WILL ALLOW United States TO PROPERLY ADDRESS ALL THE ISSUES FOR THE FUTURE RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OWNERS.THESE WERE OUR MAJOR CONCERNS WHICH ATTENDS TO EVERY LITTLE THING I HAVE AT THIS PARTICULAR TIME. > > MANY THANKS QUITE. AS I DISCUSSED WE HAVE FOUR PERSON THAT IS ARE SUBSCRIBED TO SPEAK AGAINST, AN W ' LL PROVIDE YOU A COMPLETE OF 10 MINS BETWEEN THE 4 OF YOU. PAUL GLEN, EDWARD FREEMAN, JOHN CHURCH, AND CHRISTY FARL. OFFER US NAME AS WELL AS ADDRESS AND ALSO COLLECTIVELY YOU HAVE TEN MINS. > >. > > GOOD AFTERNOON, LADIES AND ALSO GENTLEMEN, 2612 BURTON ROADWAY. LIKE TO TALK TO YOU CONCERNING THE SCHOOL TO BEGIN WITH. PHONE CALL AS WELL AS GOTTEN IN TOUCH WITH ALL OF THEM, THERE WAS NOT ONE AVAILABLE SPACE FAR YOUNGSTER. CHARTER SCHOOL ON RED MILL AND ALSO ONE ON >> LAKE WOODLAND HIGHWAY WAS ALSO LITTLE FARTHER THAN THAT SOME INSTITUTION. NOT ONE LOCATION THERE. NEXT BIG PROBLEM IS GOING TO BE TRAFFIC. I LIVE 5 TENTHS OF A MILE FROM GEAR STREET.TODAY WHEN I LEFT MY HOME RUNNING 40 MILES PER HOUR, I MET 25 CARS FROM THERE TO EQUIPMENT. IF YOU CONSTRUCT HOUSES PER THE HOME NEXT TO ME HAS 4 CARS AND TRUCKS. THOSE INDIVIDUALS HAVE KIDS, YOU GOING TOHAVE CARS TOO P. LET EVERYONE KNOW I DID TELEPHONE CALL STATE AS WELL AS THE STATE
MALED ME A LETTER 12/3/18 AS WELL AS THIS IS NOT THE 18 RESEARCH THIS IS THE 17 RESEARCH STUDY. THEY DON ' T DO THEM ANNUALLY. THE 17 RESEARCH STUDY THEY STATED ON CHEEK ROADWAY WAS FOUR THOUSAND 4 HUNDRED VEHICLES SHUT OFF OF CHEEK ON EQUIPMENT ROAD. THAT ' S 5 THOUSAND VEHICLES. I ' M NOT A LOVELY MATHEMATICIAN BUT THAT ' S NINE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED CARS A DAY IN 17, NOT 18. THIS REQUIRES TO BE ADDRESSED WITH THE RESEARCH OF YOUNGSTERS, INSTITUTIONS, AS WELL AS WEBSITE TRAFFIC. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. > > MANY THANKS P. > > FOR THE DOCUMENT SIR, YOU MAY UH HAVE GIVEN United States YOUR NAME AND ALSO I'MISSED IT. YOU ' RE MR. ECO-FRIENDLY; IS THAT'CORRECT? MR. GLEN, MANY THANKS. WE HAVE EDWARD FREEMAN NEXT. > > E WARD FREEMAN.PRETTY MUCH AGREE WITH MR. GLEN. I RESIDED IN THIS LOCATION FOR 45 YEARS AS WELL AS I ' VE SEEN SOME CHANGES IN> THE TRAFFIC. >> LET ALONE WHAT ITS GOING TO PERFORM TO THE SCHOOL SYSTEM. I TOTALLY OPPOSE ANY AREA CHANGE IN THIS LOCATION.– BECAUSE OF THAT AND THE TRAFFIC. >> THANK YOU.
> > MANY THANKS. JOHN CHURCH. > > THANKS, GOOD NIGHT NOW I'UH ASSUMPTION IT IS P. JOHN PARISH, 2704 BURTON ROAD, BESIDE THE PROPERTY. I ' D LIKE TO DISCUSS 50 FOOT BARRIER THAT THEY WANT TO REMOVE, I ' D LIKE TO SEE THT REMAIN IN PLACE >>. REASON IT ' >> S 50 FOOT UNDISTURBED BUFFER AND ALSO ALLOW ME TO OFFER YOU BACKGROUND ON THIS.WE ' VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AND ALSO WE HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THE PEOPLE BUILDING THE HOUSES. THEY GO IN AS WELL AS DEVELOP ALL THE HOUSES THEY NEED BUT WE WEPT OVER THIS RIGHT HERE IN'2002; WE ' VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY SINCE 1999.
CURRENTLY IT ' S COME BACK ONCE AGAIN TO UH YOU GUYS TO SEE IF YOU ' LL RELOCATE IT TO THE CITY BOARD TO TAKE A FEW OF THE BENEFITS AWAY, AND WITH THE AMOUNT OF WEB TRAFFIC THEY ' RE GOING TO HAVE'IN BELOW WITH THESE 272 HOUSES, THE IF IT'REMAINS AT 272, I ASSUME UH ITS GOING TO BE GREATER THAN 272. I TALKED WITH THE DEVELOPER TONIGHT, FIRST TIME I OBTAINED An OPPORTUNITY TO TALK WITH HIM, AND ALSO HE ' S STELING ME HE ' S GOING TO TRY TO DEVELOP PERHAPS 5 HOMES TO AN ACRE, 8 THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT LOTS, AND HE DOES HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF WETLANDS IN THERE.SOMEWHERE, WE UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT WE ' D LIKE TO SEE SOME WAY FOR THE CARS TO FIND OUT OF THAT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY BESIDES PERTAINING TO BURTON ROAD AND ARDSLEY DRIVE. WE ' D LIE TO SEE SOME RETURN UP TO BRAGG ROAD ARE AND
MANNIX ROAD AND NOW THESE GUYS SAY THEY CAN ' T DO THAT SINCE THERE ' S A CREEK P UP THERE. I WEAR ' T KNOW WHAT ' S TRANSFORMED FROM 2002 UNTIL TODAY, BUT SOMETHING HAS ALTERED THAT THEY CONTAINER ' T USE THOSE TWO ROADS ANYMORE TO GO TO REDWOOD ROAD. REDWOOD ROADWAY'HAS A DIRECT GAIN ACCESS TO TO I 85 SO IT ' S OUTLINED TO ACCESS IN AND OUT, AS WELL AS THAT ' S BOTH THINGS, I PRESUME, THAT ' S WORRIES THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IS THE AMOUNT OF WEB TRAFFIC THAT ' S GOING TO BE EMERGING. I ' D LIKE'TO REMIND YOU, TOO, ON WHEN IT ' S REL RAINY CLIMATE THAT'BURTON ROAD FLOODS AT PANTHER CREEK.BURTON ROAD APPROXIMATELY MY WAISTLINE IN ONE OF THE STORMS, BUT IT DOES FLOOD. I PUT ON ' T KNOW IF THE DESIGNER NEEDS TO PUT IN LARGER WATER LINES ON BURTON ROAD; DOES HE REQUIRED TO PUT IN A BRIDGE AT BURRTON ROAD, HE ' S GOING TO NEED TO PLACE IN A TURN LANE FOR CERTAIN RIGHT THERE BESIDE MY RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY', PARTICIPATING OF MY UH HOME. I HAVE NO PROBLEM KEEPING THAT, BUT, AS LONG AS THEY DON ' T TAKE ALSO MUCH OF IT. HE ' S DEFINITELY GOT SOME STUFF TO DO UH BUT I ' D LIKE TO SEE SOMETHING DONE'ABOUT THAT WATER AND ALSO HE TALKED THE TRUTH, THERE ' S A GREAT DEAL OF WETLANDS BACK THEREIN AND EXTREMELY UNDERSTOOD FEW PLACES THEY CONTAINER BUILD, BUT THEY STILL NEED ACCESSIBILITY TO REDWOOD ROADWAY AND ALSO DON ' T REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT 90 RESIDENCES BEFORE THEY OBTAIN ACCESSIBILITY TO A 2ND OUTLET.THEY WANT TO BUILD 90 RESIDENCES AND AFTER THAT GET A SECOND ACCESS OUT. I
BELIEVE UH THEY REQUIRED TO GET THAT NO GREATER THAN 50 OR 60, BUT I ' D LIKE YOU GUYS TO TELL ME WHAT YOU ASSUME. HE INTENDED TO BUILD 90 HOMES AND AFTER THAT SEEK AN ELECTRICAL OUTLET. I ' D LIKE FOR THE OUT LET TO BE MENTIONED PRIOR TO STARTING DOING ANYTHING AND AFTER 50 OR 60 RESIDENCES, HAVE THE ROADWAY READY FOR SECONDLY ACCESS BENT ON REDWOOD ROADWAY. HE ' S INFORMED ME HE NEEDS THIS 50 FOOT BUFFER FOR DRAIN. I WEAR ' T KNOW HOW WATER CAN DRAINPIPE BETTER ON CLEARED LAND'THAN IT CANISTER ON POPULATED LAND WHERE IT ' S OBTAINED TREES AND ALSO SHRUBS ON ME.LOOK LIKE TO ME IT WOULD DRAIN BETTER IF IT HAD SOMETHING TO QUIT THE CIRCULATION SUCH AS TREES AND ALSO SHRUBS, BUT YOU GUYS WILL NEED TO TELL ME,
AND ALSO I THINK THAT ' S ABOUT ALL I REQUIRED TO ASK YOU THIS EVENING. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME. > > MANY THANKS. > > MANY THANKS. MR. MILLERER CAME OUT AND INVESTIGATED THIS PIECE OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AND ALSO I SAY THANKS TO HIM FOR APPEARING AND ALSO THANKS COMMISSIONERS FOR HEARING US OUT TONIGHT. > > FINALLY WE HAVE CHRISTY FAL. > > GREAT NIGHT, CHRISTY FARL, LIVE AT 2519 AUBREY DRIVE AND WE ' RE COMPLETELY AGAINST THIS. >> OUR ROADWAY IS ALREADY >> LIKE A DRAG STRIP AND OPENING UP ARDSLEY DRIVE FOR GAIN ACCESS TO TO THESE HOMES IS GOING TO ADVERTISE SO MUCH MORE WEB TRAFFIC. WHEN YOU OBTAINED PEOPLE WHEN THEY HAD REDWOOD ROADWAY AS COMPONENT OF THE BRIDGE EVERYBODY ' S CUTTING THROUGH ARDSLEY. WE ' VE GOT A CHILDREN AND ALSO SEVERAL HOUSEHOLDS RIGHT HERE WITH CHILDREN, YO CAN ' T EVEN ALLOW THEM TO OUT TO PLAY AND ALSO RIDE BIKES OR WALK FOR SAFETY BECAUSE YOU GOT INDIVIDUALS OPERATING 50 MILES PER HOUR DOWN THE STREET.WE ' RE AGAINST THIS BECAUSE THERE ' S EVEN MORE WEBSITE TRAFFIC, MORE RESIDENCES, MORE INDIVIDUALS, MORE CARS, AS WELL AS AS FOR SLOWING DOWN TRAFFIC DOWN
WE'' VE HAD SHERIFF OUT THERE'MONITORING AS WELL AS WE JUST SPOKE WITH AUTHORITIES OFFICERS AS WELL AS STATE TROOPER ON OUR ROAD AND NO PERSON ' S DONE ANYTHING ABOUT IT. INSTEAD OF OPENING IT UP ALLOWING THESE HOUSES IN AND ALL THESE TRAFFIC COMING VIA ARDSLEY,'BURTON AND ALSO BEING THE ONLY ACCESS IT ' S GOING TO BE WEB TRAFFIC AS WELL AS SAFETY ISSUES AND ALSO ELDERLY UH NEIGHBORHOOD BACKING IN AS WELL AS OUT OF THEIR DRIVEWAY. THAT ' S ABOUT ALL I HAVE TO SAY. > > WONDERFUL. THANK YOU. > > [LOW AUDIO] > > YES, YOU HAVE A MINUTE-AND-A-HALF. > > MANY THANKS EXTREMELY MUCH. >> THEY DID A RESEARCH STUDY IN >> 2015, AS WELL AS TODAY EACH YEAR DROPS LAKE >> IS CLOSED.I DON ' T KNOW IF ANYONE >> RECOGNIZES THAT OR NOT, AND I WENT THERE AS WELL AS SKIED FOR TWENTY YEARS, GOT TOO OLD, BUT NOW, MABE I OBTAIN'MY YOUTH BACK, LONG TALE SHORT THEY BLAME IT ON THE DUCKS. MY UH YEARS OF WINTER SPORTS THERE FOR TWENTY YEARS, IT WON ' T, BUT IF THEY DO A STUDY UH IN 2015, AS WELL AS WE OBTAINED A GREAT DEAL OF GRAY SEEK PANTHER CREEK. I DON ' T KNOW WHAT THIS IS, CLIFORM MICROORGANISM DEGREES. I ' M CERTAIN IT ' S NOT DUCKS UP FIFTY PERCENT THE CREEK'THAT FEEDS INTO THAT LAKE BUT THEY ' RE CLOSING THE SWIM AREA ANNUALLY AND THEY PROGRAM IT ON TV P IF Y ' ALL DISCOVERED THAT. THANKS ONCE AGAIN. EXCELLENT NIGHT. > > THANK YOU, SIR. AT THIS MOMENT WE ' RE GOING TO CLOSE THE GENERAL PUBLIC HEARING. I AIM TO COMMISSIONERS FOR ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, DISCUSSION. BEGIN ON MY LEFT THIS TIME. > > DO YOU DESIRED TO PROVIDE CANDIDATE A LONG TIME TO– CONSIDERING THAT HE JUST TOOK– > > I WASN ' T SURE BECAUSE WE DID THAT FOR THE LAST INSTANCE. >> YOU STATED HE WAS GOOD TO THANK YOU. THAT ' S CONSTANTLY EXCELLENT. COMMISSIONER HORNBUCKLE. > >'I SIMPLY FOR THE PROGRAMMER, SIR, I ' M RETIRED SHERIFF ' S REPLACEMENT AND ALSO I PENETRATED THAT LOCATION FOR LOTS YEARS AND ALSO AS> THAT GENT SPECIFIED I ' VE HAD TO WADE THROUGH THIN DOWN THEREIN PLACING OUP CLOSURE INDICATORS WHEN IT FLOODS. THAT ' S A FLOOD'AIRPLANE DOWN THEREIN. I DON ' T SEE ANY MEANS POSSIBLE IN WANTING TO REARE STEP THE BARRIER THERE, THE ALL-NATURAL BARRIER THERE TO MAKE AN ENTRYWAY THEREIN. I CERTAINLY BELIEVES I WOULD FIND A WAY TO DO IT OFF OF MANNIX ROAD if IF I WAS GOING TO DEVELOP THAT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. IT WOULD BE A LOT MORE BENEFICIAL TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE ARDZ ALY DRIVE LOCATION, THAT WHOLE AREA AS THE GENT SPECIFIED IT ' S DIRECT REDWOOD ROADWAY, GOES STRAIGHT TO I 85. IT WOULD TAKE A LOT OFF OF F THAT AREA AND BURTON ROADWAY IS, DEER STREET, CHEEK ROADWAY IS REALLY STUFFED DOWN THEREIN NOW. I UH JUST DO NOT SEE PLACING AN ENTRY ANYWHERE NEAR THAT FLOOD PLANE DOWN THEREIN. THAT ' S A DISASTER, TO ME, DISASTER WAITING TO HAPPEN. > > AMEN. [APPLAUSE] > > WE DO ASK THAT WE HAVE POLICIES OF ETIQUETTE AT THE PUBLIC HEARINGS SO YOU CAN PROVIDE A THUMBS >> UP IF YOUR APPRECIATE THE COMMENT.THANK YOU COMMISSIONER HORN FASTENING. COMMISSIONER MILLER. > > SEVERAL QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF TO MKE SURE I UH UNDERSTAND. WE HAVE A GROWTH APLAN EMBRACED 200 # AND IT SHOWS LOTS BUT I ' >> M ASSUMING THE WHOLE LOTS REVEALED ON THIS GROWTH PLAN ARE NOT DEVOTED AS A RESULT OF THE AGE OF THE ADVANCEMENT PLAN WHICH THE GUIDELINES WERE'SUBSEQUENTLY TRANSFORMED TO NEED GRAPHIC MENATIONS TO BE COMMITMENTS. > > YOU ' RE CORRECT. > > SO HE COULD SHIFT THE WHOLE LOTS AROUND BUT WHAT DOESN ' T MODIFICATION IS THE TOTAL RESIDENCE DEVICES PERRER ACRE 1.69 AS WELL AS THE HOUSING> TYPE IS A COMMITMENT. >> > > CORRECT. > > ALL RIGHT. WANT TO MAKE SURE I UH UNDERSTAND. ASSIST ME UNDERSTAND CONNECTIVELY RULES BELOW AS APPLIED IN UDO OPERATING IN REVERSE TO A 2002 DEVELOPMENT. >> NOW UH, THIS HOME REVEALS CONNECTIONS WITH– SEE IF I OBTAIN THM ALL– BURTON, BRAGG ROAD, ARDSLEY, AND ALSO THOSE ARE THE JUST ADJACENT RIGHTS-OF-WAY. DO CONNECTIVITY RULES IN UDO REQUIRE THEM TO CONNECT TO OTHER AREA WHERE IS PUBLIC LEGAL RIGHTS OF MEANS RUN UP TO AND ALSO JOIN THEIR BUILDING? CURRENTLY I ' M SIMPLY LOOKING AT DEVELOPMENT PLAN.I ' VE GOT A LITTLE VERSION OF IT SO I ' M NOT SURE I ' M SEEING IT EXACTLY AS I SHOULD. WORKING FROM EAST TO EAST. BURTON, PROPERTY SIGNS UP WITH AT BURTON, SIGNS UP WITH AT BRAGG ROAD.
PAVEMENT STOPS UP ON MAYBE I'DON ' T KNOW 2 HUNDRED FEET SHORT OF THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE BUT RIGHT OF WAY RUNS RIGHT DOWN TO THE BUILDING. > > SO FOR CONNECTIVITY TO SURROUNDING STUBBOUTS– > > EXACTLY. > > RIGHT, SO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTES CAN BE DETERMINED AT WEBSITE STRATEGY THAT A LINK IS >> OPTIONAL AS A RESULT OF EXISTING PROBLEMS. CONNECTIONS TO ARDSLEY >> ARE SHOWN ON ADVANCEMENT PLAN AND WOULD BE REQUIRED, I THINK THERE ' S A STUBBOUT THERE. > > THERE ' S A SUBBOUT AT ARDSLEY AND THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED? > > YES. > > THEN THERE ' S A STUB AT BRAGG ROAD,'AND ALSO THAT ' S REQUIRED UNLESS THEY GET LET OFF HOOK AT SITE PLAN AS A RESULT OF ECOLOGICAL? >> > > CORRECT.THAT ' S IN WHICH THIS IS UPCOMING IN WITH ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION. > > AFTER THAT WE COME BY TO MANNIX ROADWAY AND THERE ' S NO STUBBOUT. MANNIX ROADWAY IS NEAR THE PROPERTY UNLESS LOT B OR SOME OTHER LOT THAT CONNECTS WITH THE STUB THERE CREATING, THEY DON ' T HAVE >> TO CONNECT THERE. > > THAT ' S CORRECT. > > WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE GROWTH STRATEGY PONDERS A LINK THEREIN SOMEWHERE ACCORDING TO HOW LOTS OF UNITS THAT ARE BUILT. REMEDY FOR THOSE REQUIREMENTS THAT THEY ' RE NOW SEEKING. >> > > DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY PROGRAM KOS> NEXTS PAST WHAT THE STATUTE REQUIRED. > > RIGHT. OVER RIGHT HERE THERE ' S A CONNECTION THAT COMES OUT AND ADJOINS An ITEM OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TO WHICH THERE IS NO RIGHT-OF-WAY OVER ON THE EASTERN SIDE.SO CURRENTLY UNDER CURRENT GUIDELINES THEY HAVE ASSURED, DEPENDING UPON THE NUMBER OF UNITS BUILT IN CERTAIN AREAS TO CONNECT TO– YOU INFORM ME. WHAT IS CURRENTLY UH REQUIREMENTS? > > YOU AREN ' T PRESENT GROWTH STRATEGY OR UNDER SUGGESTED? >
> CURRENT GROWTH PLAN. > > THEY ' RE REQUIRED TO CONNECT TO BASED OFF OF MESSAGE COMMITMENTS THAT ARE SHOWN THAT ' S WHAT REQUIRED THE MANIX [LOW AUDIO]>. BRAGG ROAD ADVERTISEMENT BURTON IS SHOWN ON ADVANCEMENT STRATEGY AS WELL AS ARDSLEY TOO >> WITH THAT STUB LINK. >> > > SO'THEN THEY ' RE GOING TO HAVE A LINK AT BURRTON AND AFTERWARDS CERTAIN NUMBER OF UNITS AN THEN THEY KR SO CONNECT TO BRAGG ROADWAY. > > SO THE RECOMMENDED MESSAGE DEDICATIONS– > > NO, THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS IS IS ALL I ' M TRYING. > > OH YES, THE SYSTEMS– > > ' UZ IT DOESN ' T NAME NAMES IT SPEAKS ABOUT CONNECTIONS OFF IN AN AREA AND I ' M TRYING TO MAKE THE– TRYING TO PUT NAMES TO CONNECTIONS. > > ARE YOU REP FERING TO TEXT COMMITMENT >> PROPOSED TO BE DELETED NUMBER 10, MAXIMUM OF 50– > > NOT REFERRING TO> MINI PROPOSED. > > CORRECT, IT ' S EXPECTED TO BE REMOVED, TEXT DEDICATION NUMBER TEN,'MAXIMUM OF 50 BUILDING ALLOWS WILL CERTAINLY BE CONCERNS IN AREA C AND ALSO
>> B UNTIL A BRAGG ROAD OR MANNIX ROADWAY CONNECTION IS OPENED UP. > >. AND AFTERWARDS THERE ' S A SPECIFIC NUMBER >> OF EVEN MORE– ULTIMATELY IF THEY BUILD IT >> AS REPORTED BY'WHAT THE CURRENT GUARANTEE IS, THE NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS OFF THE HOME WILL THEY EVENTUALLY HAVE AT BUILD-OUT? THREE? BURTON MANNIX ROADWAY AND ALSO BRAGG ROADWAY. > > ARDSLEY. > > SO IS IT FOUR OR >>– IF THEY HAVE BURTON AND ALSO'ARDSLEY, DO THEY HAVE ARE TO HAVE BRAGG ROAD AND MAN MIX ROADWAY OR BRAG G OR MANNIX. > > I ' M READING IT AS BOTH. > > ALL. THANK YOU. WHAT THEY WISH TO HAVE IS SIMPLY TWO CON NEXTS? > > CORRECT. > > TWO CONNECTIONS WOULD BE BURTON AS WELL AS> ARDSLEY. >> > > YES. TWO CONNECTIONS UP TO 90 SYSTEMS. AFTER 90 UNITS THEY WOULD REQUIREMENT ADDITIONAL CONNECTION. > > WHICH WOULD BE BRAGG ROADWAY OR MANNIX >> ROADWAY? > > POTENTIALLY. >> > > ALL RIGHT. THANKS. THOSE ARE MY UH QUESTIONS. ENSURE I ' VE COVERED THEM ALL. >> AMONG MY CONCERNS BELOW IS THAT I DROVE ALL OVER THE MACE AROUND. MANNIX ROADWAY IS MUCH OF A ROAD. IT ' S NO MEANT TO BE A PROVIDER OF A GREAT DEAL OF WEB TRAFFIC. IT> ' S INTENDED TO OFFER YOUR HOMES THAT GET ON IT. BRAGG >> ROADWAY IS BETTER >> BUT NOT MUCH.AT LEAST IT ' S A BIGGER SIDEWALK. AS I'TAKE A LOOK AT THE MAP AND ALSO EXPERIENCE IT LOOK LIKE MANNIX ROAD IS A TINY RIGHT OF WAY. MY BIGGEST WORRY ABOUT– AND I ASSUME IT ' S CRUCIAL FOR US TO NOTE; THE PROGRAMMER HAS THE ZONING HE NEEDS TO CONSTRUCT THIS TASK. HE HAS LEGAL RIGHTS GOTTEN IN TOUCH WITH IT AND ALSO RESPONSIBILITY LINKED WITH'IT. HE CAN CONNECTION TO BURTON WE LIKE IT OR NOT. HE MUT CONNECT TO ARDSLEY UNDER THE CODE AND THERE ' S NO OTHER WAY OUT OF THAT. I MEAN UNLESS WE ARGUE IN SOME WAY THE UDO PROVISION– WITH REGARD TO ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES PERTAINING TO PANTHER CREEK MAY GET RID OF THAT, I DON ' T KNOW HOW THAT WOULD FUNCTION. MY BIGGEST CONCERN IS ULTIMATELY THE MEANS IN AND ALSO OUT OF'THIS JOB AS IT IS PROPOSED, NEEDS EVERYBODY TO RIDE ALONG THIS LITTLE AREA THAT ' S REGARDING 6 LOTS WORTH OF THIS ROAD OPERATING ALONG PANTHER CREEK. IT ' S NOT NAMED BU WOULD BE AN EXPANSION OF BRAGG ROAD.IF IT FLOODS DOWN THERE, THEN EVERYBODY IS TRAPPED UNTIL WE HAVE THESE EASTERLY CONNECTIONS. IF WE CONNECT AT BRAGG ROADWAY, THOUGH, INDIVIDUALS CAN COME OUT THROUGH BRAGG ROADWAY AS WELL AS DON ' T HAVE TO DELAY THROUGH THAT LITTLE MANNER IN WHICH RUNS RIGHT NEXT TO PANTHER'CREEK. WE DON ' T HAVE A WHOLE LOT 06 CHOICES
RIGHT HERE. WE CONTAINER NOT BLOCK A FREEWAY LINK THAT THE PROGRAMMER MAINTAINED WHEN WE GOT THE HOME REZONED IN 2002, WE CAN ONLY MANAGE THE JOB IN FRONT OF US. I ' M NOT SATISFIED WITH THIS, DIRECTLY. I THINK THAT THE EVEN MORE LINKS THAT THIS ENVIRONMENTALLY-IMPACTED RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY UH NEEDS TO PERMIT INDIVIDUALS TO FIND An ESCAPE OF THIS BUT DOES NOT CALL FOR THEM TO CONNECT TO BURTON OR TO ON THAT LITTLE AREA OF ROADWAY THAT IS THAT ADVANCEMENT THAT WOULD CONNECT TO ARDSLEY TO BURTON IS DESIRABLE.AND SO UNDER'THE PRESENT NEEDS, WHICH WOULD BE 3 OR 4 LINKS AT BUILDOUT WHICH WOULD INCLUDE BRAGG ROADWAY AND ALSO MANNIX ROADWAY, I ASSUME TAT I MY POINT OF VIEW IS BETTER THAN DOING AROUND ABOUT IT. I LIKEWISE AM WORRIED CONCERNING THE 50 FOOT BARRIER. I WOULD FEEL BETTER ABOUT– I UH MIGHT ADJUST USAGE OF THE HOME THAT ' S NOW DESIGNATE TRANSITIONAL USAGE LOCATION OF THIS 50 FOOT BUFFER IF HE SHOWED United States EXACTLY WHICH THEY ' RE GOING TO USAGE INSTEAD OF THROW THE ENTIRE THING OUT. WHEN THIS IS REZONED IN 2002 WE CREATED EXPECTATION FOR THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS, MY REASON FOR THAT IS EVEN THOUGH WE DON ' T REQUIRE IT ANY RONGER IS THAT. SO THAT ' S BEYOND SIMPLY ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. THESE ARE SENSIBLE EXPECTATIONS AMONGST EXISTING NEIGHBORS AS WELL AS BRAND-NEW NEIGHBORS.I DON ' T INTEND TO SIMPLY TOSS THOSE OUT. WHERE WE CAN USAGE THAT LAND TO AND REVEAL IT ON A BRAND-NEW DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY HOW IT MAKES SOME OTHER ISSUE CONNECTED TO DESIGNER OF THIS BUILDING BETTER, AFTER THAT ALLOW ' S DISCUSS THAT SPECIFICALLY, BUT I ' M AN TO THROE E THROE OUT THE ENTIRE THING. I ' M GOING TO BE BALLOT NO. I ASSUME THERE SHOULD BE AS LOTS LINKS IN AND ALSO OUT OF THIS PROTY AS NECESSARY TO REIEVE THE CONCERN IF THE PRINCIPLE LINKS ARE ARDSLEY AND ALSO BURTON AND THEY CIRCULATION DOWN TO A ROAD THAT I THINK WILL FLOOD.I BELIEVE THAT ' S THE ONLY MEANS TO ACCOMPLISH IT. I THINK THERE REQUIREMENT BE LINK AT BURTON.
WE ' RE REDUCING 50 FOOT BARRIER TO WHAT ' S REQUIRED BY UDO, IT ' LL OFFER United States MORE VERSATILITY TO CORRECTLY LOCATE THOSE GREAT DEALS ALONG FRONTAGE. I TALKED TO THE DEVELOPER TONIGHT, FIRST TIME I GOT A POSSIBILITY TO TALK TO HIM, AND HE ' S STELING ME HE ' S GOING TO SHOT TO DEVELOP POSSIBLY FIVE HOMES TO AN ACRE, 8 THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT GREAT DEALS, AND HE DOES HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF WETLANDS IN THERE.SOMEWHERE, WE UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT WE ' D LIKE TO SEE SOME WAY FOR THE VEHICLES TO COME OUT OF THAT RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY BESIDES COMING TO BURTON ROAD AS WELL AS ARDSLEY DRIVE. REDWOOD ROADWAY'HAS A STRAIGHT ACCESS TO I 85 SO IT ' S LAID OUT TO ACCESS IN AND ALSO OUT, AND ALSO THAT ' S THE 2 THINGS, I GUESS, THAT ' S PROBLEMS THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IS THE AMOUNT OF WEB TRAFFIC THAT ' S GOING TO BE COMING OUT. CURRENTLY I ' M JUST LOOKING AT GROWTH PLAN.I ' VE GOT A LITTLE VARIATION OF IT SO I ' M NOT SURE I ' M SEEING IT EXACTLY AS I SHOULD. > > OH YES, THE DEVICES– > > ' UZ IT DOESN ' T NAME CALLS IT CHATS REGARDING CONNECTIONS OFF IN AN AREA AS WELL AS I ' M TRYING TO MAKE THE– WANTING TO PUT NAMES TO CONNECTIONS.ON THE STREETS, SO WE HAVE FUTURE STREET NETWORK'THAT IS THE MAP IS CONSISTED OF IN YOUR PACKAGE AS WELL AS I ' VE GOT A MAP REVEALING AS DEVELOPMENT OCCURS OVER TME HOW WE ' D LIKE TO SEE GREATER CONNECTIONS OF ROADWAYS IN ADDITION TO THAT WE ' VE GOT TOOK ON STREET SECTIONS IN THE STATUTE THAT ARE LOOKING TO DEVELOP MORE MULTIMODAL STREETS WHERE INDIVIDUALS CN STROLL AS WELL AS BIKE AND ALSO DRIVE AS WELL AS HAVE BUSES ALL FUNCTIONING TOGETHER.ALSO HAVE ESTABLISHED OPTIMUM BLOCK LOCATION AS WELL AS SIZES STATUTE AS SUBDIVISION OCCURS AND ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH MORE CIVIL LIBERTIES OF MEANS. 2 THINGS WE HAVE IN CURRENT PROPOSAL, ONE IS TRANSITIONAL USAGE LOCATION THAT APPLIES,'YOU TIN SEE THERE ' S A YELLOW FILLED LI– HARD TO MAKE OUT ON THIS MAP– THAT WOULD BE A TRANSITIONAL USAGE AREA WHERE ANY GROWTH WITHIN THAT AREA WOULD CALL FOR MAJOR UNIQUE USAGE PERMIT WITH A HANDFUL OF SEARCHINGS FOR THAT ARE SFOIFK THAT SPECIFIC FUTURE SPECIAL USE PERMIT.IT WOULD INCLUDE EXCEPTION FROM EXISTING GROWTH AS LONG AS THE STRUCTURE OR THE AREA DISTU DISTURBANCE DOESN ' T BOOST. > > THAT WOULD CALL FOR THAT I THINK WE CHATTED CONCERNING YEARLY CHECKS TO ENSURE THEY ' RE IN CONFORMITY WITH THAT WHICH I ' M NOT SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE IN PLACE YET BUT WOULD HAVE TO ESTABLISH THAT KIND OF THING.
AS THE MAJORITY OF ARE MINDFUL WE ' VE GOT VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT TIERS IN COME PABLG DEAL NEIGHBORHOODS ARE THOSE THAT ARE PLANNED TO CHANGE TO MIXED USE, WALKABLE, HIGHER THICKNESS AS WELL AS STRENGTH AREAS SUSTAINED BY TRANSIT.THERE ' S TWO ACTIONS TO PUT THIS PROJECT IN AREA. WE HAVE A GO-TO AREA AND GENERALLY NO OTHER MINIMUM LAWN SUGGESTED MAKING CERTAIN THAT THE BUILDING ISSING UP TO MEET THE STREET TO SHAPE AREA YOU ' RE IN AS YOU ' RE WALKING ALONG THE PATHWAY OR THE ROAD. ON THE ROADS, SO WE HAVE FUTURE ROAD NETWORK'THAT IS THE MAP IS INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET AND ALSO I ' VE GOT A MAP REVEALING AS GROWTH OCCURS OVER TME HOW WE ' D LIKE TO SEE GREATER CONNECTIVITY OF ROADWAYS IN ENHANCEMENT TO THAT WE ' VE GOT EMBRACED ROAD SECTIONS IN THE REGULATION THAT ARE LOOKING TO CREATE EVEN MORE MULTIMODAL STREETS WHERE PEOPLE CN STROLL AND ALSO BIKE AND ALSO DRIVE AND ALSO HAVE BUSES ALL OPERATING TOGETHER.ALSO HAVE ESTABLISHED MAXIMUM BLOCK PLACE AND ALSO SIZES STATUTE AS SUBDIVISION HAPPENS AND ORDINANCE TO CREATE EVEN MORE RIGHTS OF MEANS. 2 THINGS WE HAVE IN CURRENT PROPOSITION, ONE IS TRANSITIONAL USE LOCATION THAT USES,'YOU CAN SEE THERE ' S A YELLOW DOTTED LI– HARD TO MAKE OUT ON THIS MAP– THAT WOULD BE A TRANSITIONAL USE LOCATION WHERE ANY ADVANCEMENT WITHIN THAT AREA WOULD CALL FOR MAJOR SPECIAL USAGE AUTHORIZATION WITH A HANDFUL OF FINDINGS THAT ARE SFOIFK THAT SPECIFIC FUTURE SPECIAL USAGE PERMIT.IT WOULD INCLUDE EXCEPTION FROM EXISTING ADVANCEMENT AS LONG AS THE BUILDING OR THE LOCATION DISTU DISTURBANCE DOESN ' T BOOST. > > THAT WOULD CALL FOR THAT I THINK WE CHATTED ABOUT YEARLY CHECKS TO ENSURE THEY ' RE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THAT WHICH I ' M NOT SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE IN AREA YET BUT WOULD HAVE TO DEVELOP THAT KIND OF THING.> > TWO JOBS. > > IN THE S 1? > > THIS IS PART OF TRYING TO NUMBER OUT HOW TO MAKE AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVE– > > ATTRACTIVE.
> > I DESIRE TO POINT OUT THE REPORT IS THE FINEST TITLE I ' VE SEEN. > > THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WE INCLUDED RIGHT INTO THE COMPACT SUBURBAN STYLE AREA. > > GOOD. > > I THINK IT ' S 45 ELEVATION. > > THIS IS PART OF TRYING TO NUMBER OUT HOW TO MAKE AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE PERK– > > ATTRACTIVE.TO START WITH, I'' LL SIMPLY NOTE I ' VE GOT VARIETY OF PICKY THINGS I ' LL SEND TO YOU AND YOU CANISTER TAKE CARE OF, BUT ONE POINT I WISHED TO REFERENCE A LONG PERIOD OF TIME AGO WHEN WE WERE DOING WHAT WAS CALLED THE 2020 STRATEGY WHERE WE WERE AGAIN LOOKING AT TRANSPORTATION STATIONS AS WELL AS STUFF LIKE THAT, OUR INTENT WAS WHAT WAS GOING BE WITHIN A FIFTY PERCENT A MILE OF THE TERMINAL, WHAT WAS GOING TO BE WITHIN QUARTER OF A MILE AND COMPONENT OF THE REASON FOR THAT ARE I THINK THE HALF MILE WAS TRULY TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION TO BE THAT'' S THE MAXIMUM DISTANCE SOMEBODY WOULD REALLY NEED TO WALK TO CAPTURE THE TRAIN IF THEY HAD TO DO THIS, YOU UNDERSTAND, EACH DAY, GOING TO AND ALSO FROM FUNCTION OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.SO IF YOU
' RE TRYING– YOU MAY WISH TO THINK, IS THERE ANY METHOD TO GET REAL ESTATE WITHIN A HALF MILE OF YOUR TERMINAL. >> > > THE WORK THAT WAS USED UP LOOKING A AT THE PORTABLE AREA TIER BORDERS USE THAT HALF MILE WHICH IS THOUGHT ABOUT 15-MINUTE STROLL OR 10-MINUTE, I CAN'' T REMEMBER, AS WELL AS QUARTER MILE IS FIVE-MINUTE STROLL. THAT'' S WHERE WE STARTED AND AFTERWARDS WE LOOKED AT WHAT ' S ON THE GROUND AS WELL AS IN WHICH ACTUAL BOUNDARY AND THING BUT WAS PART OF THE FACTOR TO CONSIDER. >> > > COMMISSIONER AL-TURK. >> > > HAS B PACK OBTAINED A CHANCE TO TALK ABOUT THESE PROPOSALS? >> > > YES– I WEAR'' T THINK WE ' VE HAD ANY DISCUSS– THERE ' S NOT A GREAT DEAL TRANSFORMING IN REGARDS TO BIKES. >> > > RIGHT >>. > > THERE ARE A GREAT DEAL OF BICYCLE CAR PARK AS WELL AS BIKE LANE PROVISIONS IN THE AREAS THAT REMAIN IN THE EXISTING REGULATION. VERY LITTLE RELATED TO THAT. J VERY LITTLE IN TERMS OF PEDESTRIAN CONCERNS TOO? >> > > NO >>. >> >
> MANY THANKS.'> > THANK YOU.WE ' LL SEE YOU UH IN FEBRUARY. OUR FINAL THING IS ALSO DETAILS ONLY. 11. II. EXPANDING REAL ESTATE CHOICE > >> EXCELLENT NIGHT. PAT YOUTHFUL, SUPERVISOR OF CITY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. MORE IMPORTANTLY I'' M An INADEQUATE ALTERNATIVE TO ELDERLY COORDINATOR IN ADDITION TO MICHAEL SUPPLY THAT ARE SECRET LEADER AND MANAGER OF THIS IMPORTANT TASK EXPANDING HOUSING CHOICES AS WELL AS APPRECIATE YOU PERPETUITY TONIGHT IN ALLOWING US TO PROVIDE TO YOU A UPDATE. EMPHASIZE GREATER THAN ANYTHING ELSE IS BASED ON COMMITMENTS WE'' VE MADE TO COUNCIL AS WELL AS TO THE ADMINISTRATION, GOING TO TAE THIS PRODUCT FORWARD TO COUNCIL AS WELL AS TO THE BOARD OF REGION COMMISSIONERS BY APRIL OR MAY AND ALSO IN ORDER TO DO THAT WE'' RE GOING T BRING TIS BACK TO YOU FOR ACTIVITY ON FEBRUARY 1ST, BUT OUR COMMITMENT TO YOU AS WELL AS AREA IS TO FUNCTION AS TOUGH AS WE HAVE SINCE MAY AND JUNE OF 2018, TO GET COMMENTS, FEEDBACK, INPUT, ANSWER YOUR CONCERNS, AS WELL AS TO LISTEN TO ANY CONCERNS THAT YOU MAY HAVE ABOUT THIS INITIATIVE SO WE CANISTER PRESENT THOSE IN WHAT WE BRING ONWARD ON P FEBRUARY 1ST.
— FEBRUARY 12TH. WE'' VE HAD THIS TASK IN OUR PREPARATION TEAM WE HAD OVER A LOTS AREA MEETINGS, WE WERE AT FIVE ROCK THE PARK OCCASIONS LAST SUMMERTIME, WE'' VE MET WITH THE FULL HOUSING TRANSIT, INTER-NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL, CONFERENCE WITH COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION REQUEST, MEETING OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL WEEK WSZ SEVERAL NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH. WE HAVE STANDING OFFER TO PRESS OUT THROUGH MEDIA THAT WE WILL CERTAINLY MEET ANY TEAM AT ANY MOMENT AS LONG AS WE HAVE AVAILABILITY OF TEAM AS WELL AS WE'' VE MET THAT COMMITMENT. WE DID ALSO HAVE TWO OPEN HOUSES RIGHT HERE LAST OF NOVEMBER. YOU MAY HAVE WENT TO, AS WELL AS THANK YOU.YOU MIGHT HAVE ALSO SEEN THE POSTERS THAT HAVE ACTUALLY CONTINUED TO BE UP OVER THE HOLIDAY THAT PROVIDE ALL THAT INFORMATION AS WELL AS I THINK MOST IMPORTANTLY– I THINK UH IT ' S IMPORTANT SINCE ABLE TO TRACK METRICS. WE HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION PORTRAYING TO YOU AND ALSO THAT WAS PROVIDED IN OPEN HOUSES ONLINE. WE ' VE RECEIVED MORE THAN MANY, MANY'THOUSANDS OF HITS AND ALSO HAD 1,300 FOLKS TAKE PART IN OUR ONLINE SURVEY OVER THE SUMMER SEASON. WE SEEM LIKE WE ' VE HAD STRONG EFFORT IN GETTING ROBUST AREA ENGAGEMENT AND SINCE WE ' RE MOVING TOWARDS BRINGING PRODUCT AHEAD WE'WISH TO EMPHASIZE THAT OVER THE NEXT MONTH OR AND ALSO YOU ARE AMONG OUR THE MAJORITY OF IMPORTANT STAKEHOLDERS. PLEASE CONNECT TO MOOISHGS MICHAEL STOCK OR SCOTT WHITEMAN. BUDGET FRIENDLY HOUSING IS THE ESSENTIAL PARTICULAR THAT ' S AIDING KNOWLEDGEABLES AND INCLUSIVE THT ALLOWS VARIETY OF HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOCUSED ON ALL REVENUES AS WELL AS INDIVIDUALS OF ALL PHASES IN THEIR LIFE AND ALSO TO MEET THEIR CHOICES AS WELL AS NEEDS.THIS PROJECT IS FOCUSED ON THAT PARTICULAR DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE AS YOU ALL ARE COGNIZANT HAVE DISCUSSED– >
> FAST QUESTION, PRESENTATION ON OUR DISPLAY BUT I WEAR ' T KNOW IF THAT ' S SOMETHING THAT WE >> CA MAKE SURE CANISTER HAPPEN, THAT WOULD BE USEFUL FOR US. > > WE'' RE SEEING YOU BUT NOT SEEING THAT. NOW WE ' RE SEEING THAT. > > THANKS. >> THAT ' S GREAT. THIS IS AVAILABLE ONLINE NATURALLY'BUT WE ' LL SHARE THIS AND ALSO PRODUCT I ' LL REFER TO TONIGHT WITH YOU ALL STRAIGHT AFTER THIS CONFERENCE, BUT THE SUCCESS IN WHAT YOU ' RE SEEING IN FRONT OF YOU NOW IS IS SUMMARY OF A RECENT DISTINCTIONS DURHAM HAS'OBTAINED TOP 10, TOP 20 CHECKLIST. DURHAM ' S SUCCESS FROM PEOPLE THROUGHOUT THE NATION AND ALSO GLOBE HAVE WISHED TO BOOST COMPETITION FOR LIMITED SUPPLY OF HOUSING AND PEOPLE ARE COMPELLED TO MAKE VARIOUS OPTIONS WHEN IT INVOLVES TRYING TO MAINTAIN UP WITH COMPETITORS EITHER RETAIN HOUSING OR FIND REAL ESTATE IN DURHAM. MUCH OF YOU RECOGNIZE OR COLLABORATED WITH DR. JOHNSON YOU TIN NC CHURCH HILL.HE DISCUSSES MOVEMENT DIVIDEND WHICH DESCRIBES RESEARCH STUDY ON MOVING INTO DURHAM WHERE THEY ' RE MOVING INTO DURHAM, WHAT STUDY THEY ' VE RELOCATED TO DURHAM BRINGS OVER- $10,000 IN ANNUAL REVENUE IN THE AVERAGE DURHAM CITIZEN. THAT ' S 17 PEOPLE A DAY P APPROXIMATELY GENERALLY. OVER 3 THOUSAND PEOPLE A YEAR MOVING TO DURHAM AND ALSO 6'THOUSAND INDIVIDUALS A YEAR MOVING TO DURHAM AND A THAT RAISED COMPETITORS IS FUNDAMENTAL FACTOR THAT NEED FOR REAL ESTATE BASICS VARIABLE IN THIS TASK IN MANY OF THE THINGS YOU ALL SEE PRIOR TO YOU. BUT AT THE SAME TIME WHEN THIS DEMAND IS INCREASING, WE ' RE E SEEING ADITIONAL ELEMENTS THAT ARE CONTRIBUTING TO THE ISSUES THAT ARE BROUGHT ON BY THE NEED ALONE.MORE WORK 29,000 TASKS CONSIDERING THAT 2010 IN DURHAM THAN AT ANY MOMENT Given That 2080s, AND MORE HOUSEHOLDS FORMED THAN MORE THAN REAL ESTATE UNITS
WERE PRODUCED. I RECOGNIZE THAT IT FEELS AND LOOK LIKE A HOUSING BOOM, A BUILDING BOOM, BUT WE ARE ON TRACK AND IT COULD ADJUSTMENT THIS YEAR, BUT WE GET ON TRACK UP VIA NINE YEARS OF THE YEARS TO CREATE LESS NEW HOUSING UNITS THAN ANY DECADE Considering That 1980s. VARIETY OF FACTORS FOR THAT, WHOLE VARIOUS OTHER SESSION ON THAT PARTICULAR, BUT OUR COMPANY BELIEVE ONE OF THOSE FACTORS ARE OUR RULES AND DEMANDS FOR REAL ESTATE WHICH ' S WHY WE ' RE DOING THIS PROECT. SO THESE FACTORS WITH EACH OTHER HAVE INCREASED COMPETITORS, HAVE LED TO EFFECT ON RATE, AND ALSO EVEN MORE SIGNIFICANTLY THIS REVEALS MODIFICATIONS'IN 2013, THAT HAVE INCREASED FROM CONCERNING 160,000 FOR AN STANDARD SYSTEM TO ALMOST 260,000. THIS PHENOMENON IS FCUSED PRIMARILY ON URBAN RATE NEAR-TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS. AREAS THAT ARE RING DOWNTOWN THAT ARE WITHIN CONCERNING TWO MILES OF DOWNTOWN. THAT ' S FOR THE RVR FACTOR EVIDENT TO LOTS OF YOU ACCESS TO JOBS, GAIN ACCESS TO TO FEATURES, ACCESS TO TRANSPORTATION, GAIN ACCESS TO TO DOWN TOWN ENTERTAINMENT CHOICES, GROCERY STORE BUYING AND ALL'VARIOUS OTHER THINGS THAT MAKE LIFE GREAT.WHAT YOU ' RE SEEING ON THE SLIDE SHEER THE OVERALL COUNTY-WIDE BOOST IN EXISTING REAL ESTATE RATE IS UP WAS 44%IS ONLY SLIGHTLY OVER AVERAGE FOR URBAN AREAS. IN OUR IN-TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS,
PARTICULARLY THOSE THAT HAVE BEEN HISTORICALLY COMMUNITIES OF SHADE, MEDIUM OR LOWER REVENUE AS WELL AS HAVE BEEN STAPLE NEIGHBORHOODS LIKE EAST DURHAM, THOSE HAVE BEEN 300 %. WE ' RE STARTING TO SEE THOSE KIND OF INCREASES IN OTHER ARAS. WHAT THAT DESCRIBES IS THE REALITY THAT THERE ' S INCREMENTALLY HIGHER NEED FROM A GREAT DEAL OF NEW RESIDENCES AND EXISTING HOUSE TO RELOCATION CLOSER TO DOWNTOWN. THAT ' S SOMETHING YOU ' VE SEEN AS WELL AS HEARD AND LIVED AS WELL AS EXPERIENCED GIVEN THAT RECESSION FINISHED IN 2010. THERE'' S A FACILITY WEB OF VARIOUS AS WELL AS HOUSING MARKET IS FACILITY, BUT OUR COMPANY BELIEVE THAT THERE ' S A REALLY RATHER clear and important APPARENT SENSATION HAPPENING HERE.A GREAT DEAL OF FOLKS ARE LOVING TO DURHAM, A GREAT DEAL OF DURHAM HOME ARE WANTING TO RELOCATE CLOSER TO MIDTOWN. IF REAL ESTATE DOESN ' T EXIST AT THEIR PRICE POINT AND ALSO HOUSING TYPE AND ALSO AREA THAT THEY WANT, THEY WILL ACQUIRE DOWN THE LADDER. THEY ' LL LOOK FOR OPPORTUNITIES IN
TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS THAT HAVE BEEN HISTORICALLY STABLE, HISTORICALLY AREA OF COLOR, LOW, MODERATE INCOME AND START PROCEDURES OF COMMUNITY MODIFICATION, JEBT GENTRIFICATION. IF YOU TIN ' T QUITE AFFORD IT VISIT CLOOE LAND HOLLOW WAY AS WELL AS BUY A MANSION.'THAT ' S BEEN HAPPENING FOR THE PAST 6 YEARS. THAT ' S 160,000 NEW INDIVIDUALS VIA 2045, 26 YEARS. THAT ' S REGARDING 60,000 REAL ESTATE UNITS THAT OUR COMMUNITY IS GOING TO NEED TO CREATE. THAT ' S A PHENOMENON WE HAVE LITTLE CONTROL OVER.THAT ' S WHAT THE MARKETPLACE IS DEMANDING. WE CONTAINER TRY TO PUSH THOSE BUT WE BELIEVE IN ORDER TO BE INCLUSIVE COMMUNITY WE NEED TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE NEW UH HOUSING UNITS. OUR COMPANY BELIEVE IT ' S ESSENTIAL THAT HIGHER SHARE O THOSE BE IN THE AREAS WHERE THE BEST NEED IS CLEARLY EVIDENT SHOWN BY THOSE HOUSING COST INCREASES SINCE 2013. EMPHASIZE BELOW THAT INCREASING HOUSING SUPPLY ALONE WILL NOT SUB STNLLY HELP AND ALSO CERTAINLY NOT FIX HOUSING COST SITUATION IN DURHAM. I WANT THE EMPHASIZE AS WELL AS PLEASE REMEMBER AN QUESTION ME OR RESEARCH IT BY YOURSELF OR HAVE A DIALOGUE CONCERNING SIT WE ' LL NEVER BE ABLE TO SIGNIFICANTLY ENHANCE THE HOUSING WITHOUT BOOSTING SUPPLY. IT ' S CRITICAL ELEMENT OF THIS SERVICE TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL YOU BE BELOW DIEZED PROGRAMS THAT AID BUDGET-FRIENDLY HOUSING TOGETHER WITH A WHOLE COLLECTION OF COMMUNITY TREATMENTS THAT WILL HELP THIS PROBLEM. AMONG THOSE ITEMS IS ALLOWING SUPPLY TO INCREASE WHERE THE MARKET'IS DEMANDING IT AS WELL AS WHERE REAL ESTATE COSTS ARE ARE REFLECTING THE TRUTH THAT THERE ' S A SIGNIFICANT MISATCH IN BETWEEN SUPPLY AS WELL AS NEED. ANOTHER BOTTOM LINE I WISH TO MAKE, IT IS CRITICAL CALL THAT WE SET BUDGET FRIENDLY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES WITH ACCESSIBILITY TO PUBLIC TRANSIT AND ALSO GETTING THE HOUSING AS QUICK AS POSSIBLE TO LITE RAIL INTEND ON THE RAIL SYSTEM IS CRITICAL.WE AL DESERVE EVEN THOUGH LITE RAIL IS YEARS OFF, IF IT TAKES PLACE WHATSOEVER– AWARE OF SOME THREAT OF THAT SITUATION– MUCH REAL ESTATE THAT ARE NEAR THESE TRANSPORTATION AREAS ARE GOING TO BE INCREDIBLY EXPENSIVE AND IT ' S GOING TO BE LIKELY TO BE DEVELOPED AS YOU SEE NOW BY BIG CORPORATIONS THAT ARE FUNDED BY WALL SURFACE ROAD OR PROPERTY OR OTHER LARGE FINANCIAL INVESTMENT ENTITIES. WHAT WE ARE CONCENTRATING ON IN THIS INITIATIVE IS ALLOWING SMALL-SCALE, GENTLE CONTEXT-SENSITIVE, APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL CERTAINLY NOT WEAKEN THAT OUTSTANDING HIGH QUALITY OF LIFE WE HAVE EXISTING AROUND NEIGHBORHOODS THAT WILL CERTAINLY ALLOW FOR FOLKS TO HAVE AFFORDABLE BY LAYOUT REAL ESTATE AND THAT ' S WHAT YOU LISTEN TO USED A GREAT DEAL. WE ' RE ROOK LOOKING AT DUPLEXES AND AACCESS DWELLING UNITS. THESE KINDS OF REAL ESTATE CHANCES UNLIKE THE LARGE– TRYING TO KEEP IN MIND THE TERMS THAT MR. BAKER AND MR. MILLER PUT ON IT– BUT THE FIVE-STORY ON A PODIUM– > > PROBABLY BETTER THAN YOU PUT ON ' T. [GIGGLING] > > I UH TRY MY BEST TO STRIP MY VOCABULARY. [INDISCERNIBLE] WHAT THIS WE THINK WILL URGE IS FUNDING BY NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBORS THAT'EXISTING HOME OWNERS CONTAINER REDEVELOP'AN AGING LOCATION. STRUCTURE AN ADU. WHAT CANISTER WE FINANCING, WHAT CONTAINER WE SOURCE? A GREAT DEAL OF COMMUNITIES ARE LOOKING AT THIS AS KEY PART OF THIS VISION. YOU MAY HEARD MINNEAPOLIS PASSED THIS IN THE CITY. WE ' RE LOOKING IN URBAN RATE. OREGON IS DEATH– >> THERE ' S BEEN A COSTS INTRODUCED THAT WOULD NEED AREA TO ALLOW QUAD >> PLEXES. WE ' RE NOT GOING THERE.
I BELIEVE WE THINK THAT THERE ' S A NATIONWIDE TREND SEEING THIS ENTER OF REAL ESTATE DEVICE IS CRITICAL. THE MAJORITY OF OF THE IN-TOWN COMMUNITIES THAT WERE ESTABLISHED, YOU SEE A GREAT DEAL OF THIS REAL ESTATE TYPE THERE AND I ASSUME THE LARGE MAJORITY OF NEIGHBORS IN THOSE AREAS SEEM LIKE IT SUITS CONTEXT. WE ' RE TRYING TO REESTABLISH THAT BY NOT DESTROYING NEIGHBORHOODS. SPEAK ABOUT DETIL IDEAS. DIFFERED FOOD SELECTION OF HOUSING TYPES THAT ARE AVAILABLE TRYING TO GET AWAY FROM SINGLE FAMILY MEMBERS OR HUGE MULTIPLEXES. STABILIZE HOUSING COSTS. WE DON ' T THINK THIS JOB WILL CERTAINLY RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL REDUCTIONS IN REAL ESTATE PRICES, WHAT IT ' LL DO IS ALOU United States OUR REAL ESTATE SYSTEM MAINTAIN RATE WITH POPULATION DEVELOPMENT AND ALSO CREATING AT THE SAME TIMES DEVELOP EVEN MORE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PEOPLE TO REMAIN IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS AND LIVE IN DURHAM.YOU ' RE GOING HER EVEN MORE FROM MICHAEL BUT IN ADDITION TO THAT PURCHASING DOWN THE LADDER IMPACT, A WHOLE LOT OF MISSION BASED NON-PROFIT HOME BUILDERS CURRENTLY HAVE GREAT DEALS OF LOFTS AROUND IN URBAN TIER AND ALSO WITH THIS PROPOSAL USING AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS CAN GO FROM ONE DEVICE TO TWO DUPLEXES. THAT ' LL BE AN IMPACT, WE BELIEVE. NOTHING WE ' RE PROPOSING RIGHT HERE IN OUR ESTIMATE– AND WE WANT YOUR RESPONSES– WOULD DESTROY OR BREAK DOWN PERSONALITY OF THE AREAS. WE WISH TO ENABLE and improve them THEM TO BE EVEN MORE OBTAINABLE FOR MORE PEOPLE WITH TIME AND ALSO ALLOW FOLKS IN THESE NEIGHBORHOODS TO STAY UH IN POSITION. AND HAVE THIS SMALL RANGE IN FILL I ' M SPEAKING ABOUT AND ULTIMATELY WE WISH TO SEE TO IT THIS CAN BE DONE BY THROUGHOUT THE RULES THAT ARE PASSED FOR THIS PROCESS.ESPECIALLY FOR SMALL DEVELOPERS AS YOU ALL HAVE LEARNT THROUGH MANY CANDIDATES STANDING AT'THIS PLATFORM, THE REZONING PROCESS AND ALSO USE AUTHORIZATION PROCESS ENFORCES SIGNIFICANT EXPENSE. THAT IS NOT WHAT WE ' RE LOOKING FOR. MICHAEL WILL TALK EVEN MORE CONCERNING THE FOOD SELECTION OF ZONING PROPOSAL ADJUSTMENTS AS WELL AS DELIGHTED TO TAKE QUESTIONS YOU AWE ALL HAVE. > > THANKS. IF I DO THE JOB APPROPRIATELY SUFFICIENT, MICHAEL SUPPLY WITH INTENDING DEPARTMENT.TOUGH TO COMPLY WITH THAT THOUGH WE ' LL SEE. I DESIRE TO BRIEFLY GO OVER WITH YOU, ONCE MORE, THESE ARE ALL THINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED AT EVEN MORE CONCEPT DEGREE THROUGHOUT THE SUMMERER INTO THE LOSS,
DISCUSSIONS TO THE ELECTED AUTHORITIES, AND AFTERWARDS ALSO SUPPLIED IN MORE DETAIL VIA AND POSTERS AS WELL AS WHAT ' S ONLINE.-WE ' RE NOT DISCUSSING ANYTHING THAT ' S BRAND-NEW. THERE ARE JUST A VARIETY OF THEM IF YOU LOOKED AT PRESENTATION ALREADY OR LOOKED ONLINE THERE ARE SOME GNERAL SUBJECTS THAT WE ' RE LOOKING TO MODIFY OR INCLUDE IN. >> THE FIRST ONE REMAINS IN FILL CRITERIA AS RUB THWARTED TO.
CONTEXT SENSITIVE GROWTH IS'SO IMPORTANT AS WELL AS IN FILL CRITERIA ARE STANDARDS THAT ARE CURRENTLY WITHIN THE UDO WHAT WE ' RE LOOKING TO DO IS MODIFY THEM TO SOMETIMES MAKE THEM CLEARER OR MAKE THE REGULATIONS MORE MEANINGFUL AND ENFORCEABLE. ALSO WE WILL BE APPEARANCE TO MODIFY THEM TO ENSURE THEY DO NOT DISPUTE WITH OTHER PROEGSS'WE'' RE PROPOSING SUCH IS AS THE SMALLER WHOLE LOT AREA OR ACTUALLY UH WIDTH DEMANDS. THESE IN FILL SPECIFICATIONS ARE MAINLY ABABLE RATE FOR RESIDENTIAL AND SERVE AS AN OVERLAY FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT ' S UNDER FOUR IN SIZE.WE NEED TO SEE TO IT THAT THEY DO NOT PRODUCE An ISSUE THAT PRODUCES SEVERAL OF THE ADJUSTMENTS THAT COULD BE MOOT. WE ' RE LOOKING AT THEM TO ADDRESS WAYS TO ADDRESS IMPACTS, ADDITIONAL BUILD ENVIRONMENT COULD HAVE SUCH AS'TREE CANDY AND MAKING LANDSCAPE DESIGN SECTION MORE MEANINGFUL LOANING FROM OLD WEST DURHAM NEIGHBORHOOD MPO. ROAD DWELLING UNITS. WE ' VE ALLOWED THEM BY RIGHT. THEY STILL ARE NOT A PREVALENT DEVELOPMENT SORT OF RESIDENCE DEVICE THROUGHOUT DURHAM. BECAUSE 2006, AROUND 70 OR 80 DEVICE UH RESIDENCE UNITS. A GREAT DEAL OF FACTORS FOR THAT. EXTREMELY LITTLE FUNDING OPTIONS FOR THOSE RIGHT CURRENTLY WHICH ' S SOMETHING WE ' RE DEALING WITH TO ADDRESS COMBINED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT PART. WE ' RE LOOKING AT GUIDELINES TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE LAWS THAT CAN OPEN EVEN MORE OPPORTUNITIES FOR AK VISZ RESIDENCE UNITS TAKING CHECK OUT LIMITATIONS ON THE WHOLE LOTS, STREAM LINING THE DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS TO SIMPLY An APARTMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIREMENT SO YOU ' RE NOT HAVING TO DETERMINE YOUR SIZE OF YOUR HOME AS WELL AS CONTRAST IT TO DIMENSION ADU YOU CAN HAVE, AND ALSO LOOKING TO EXPAND A LITTLE OF PLACE WHERE THEY CONTAINER GO ON THE WHOLE LOT TOO TO PERMIT EVEN MORE FLEXIBILITY.ALSO PERHAPS BROADEN THEM TO DUPLEX LOTS TOO, TO BEGIN INTRODUCING ADU ON A LOT THAT ALREADY HAS DUPLEX. CURRENTLY ALLOWED ON ANY GREAT DEAL THAT ALLOWS SINGLE FAMILY UNITS. COMMUNITY HOUSES CANISTER HAVE ADU AS COMPONENT OF IT'TOO. DUPLEXES. QUITE HONESTLY, WE ' RE LOOKING TO BROADEN DUPLEX ALLOCATION THROUGHOUT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS IN URBAN TIER AND ALSO ALSO EXPAND OPPORTUNITY OF WHEN TO YOU A CUSTOMIZED CELLULAR DIVISION THAT CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION IN SUBURBAN RATE WHICH BECOME EVEN MORE WIDESPREAD. THOSE ARE BY-RIGHT SORTS OF SUBDIVISIONS IN WHICH YOU OBTAIN A COMPROMISE ON SMALLER WHOLE LOT SIZES OR PERHAPS BOOST STRENGTH WITH PRESERVATION NEIGHBORHOOD WHICH GIVE EVEN MORE OPEN ROOM OR PROTECTED LOCATIONS. WE ACTUALLY HEARD THAT FROM COUNCIL WHEN THERE WAS ONE PRESERVATION REZONING TIED TO AN INTERESTING PRESERVATION QUESTIONING WHY THEY NEEDED THE REZONING AND ALSO THEY ' RE TIEING IT TO An ADVANCEMENT THAT JUST ALLOW SOLITARY FAMILY AND THEY SUBSIDED TO PERFORM COMMUNITY HOUSES. WE ' RE LOOKING TO EXPAND DUPLEXES AND BEGIN TREATING– THEME THROUGHOUT THESE STARTING TO REWARD DUPLEXES 2 SYSTEMS AND ALSO ALL UNITS SAME AS SOLITARY FAMILY PRODUCTION THEM NOT PRODUCTION DUPLEX ATTRACT ATTENTION GREATER THAN A SINGLE FAMILY MEMBERS HOME WOULD BE DEVELOPED, THE SAME.DEVELOPMENT SPECIFICATIONS -LOTS DIMENSIONS AS WELL AS DENSITY.AS WE ' VE DISCUSSED QUITE ESPECIALLY ATTEMPTING TO RISE DENSITY WITHIN SEVERAL OF THESE IN-TOWN NEIGHBORHOODS AND THUS ADJUSTING GREAT DEAL SIZES AS NECESSARY FOR BY-RIGHT. WE ' VE TAKEN A CHECK OUT FIGURES CURRENTLY ONTHE BOOKS FOR ZONING AREAS AS WELL AS USAGE THOSE FOR CHANGES AS YOU ' VE SEEN AND HOPEFULLY YOU ' VE SEEN IN DOCUMENTS AND THROUGH OPEN HOUSES YOU ' VE SEEN THESE WAT WE ' RE PROPOSING AT THIS TIME TO ADJUST THEM DOWN BY ONE STEP.AND AFTER THAT THICKNESS ADJUSTMENTS ARE REALLY TO ALIGN THE GREAT DEAL DIMENSIONAL CRITERIA WITH MAXIMUM THICKNESS CONNECTED WITH THOSE HOOKING AT MAP AS WELL AS ENSURING THOSE MAXIMUM DO NOT DISPUTE WITH FLUM DESTINATIONS. A BRAND-NEW RESIDENCE TYPE BEING PROPOSED IS COTTAGE ON SMALL LOT. THERE ARE A PAIR THINGS WITH THIS. WE HEARD REMARKS OR PASSION IN ALLOWING PEOPLE TO DO– THERE ' S NO MINIMUM– THE ZONING DOES NOT REQUIRE A MINIMAL HOME SIZE AND ALSO THERE ' S BEEN A GREAT DEAL OF PASSION IN COTTAGE– NOT DISCUSSING LITTLE HOMES, BUT SMALLER HOUSES AND THAT THERE ' S NOT A NEED FOR LARGER LO FOR A SMALLER SIZED HOME. 'WE HAVE INTRODUCED THE REAL ESTATE TYPE THAT ENABLES FOR A SMALLER WHOLE LOT SIZE, PROBABLY AROUND WHAT WE PROPOSE AROUND TWO THOUSAND SQUARE FEET BUT IN TRADE YOU ARE COVERED AT THE DIMENSION OF THE HUSE THAT YOU'CAN PUT ON THAT GREAT DEAL. > > [LOW AUDIO] > > 1,200 SQUARE FEET WITH AN 800 SQUARE
FOOT FINGERPRINT A MINIMUM OF THE NUMBERS SUGGESTED TODAY. A SECONDLY PAT OF THAT IS A SMALLER FLAG GREAT DEAL CHOICE WHERE YOU CONTAINER MINIMIZE THE FLAG LOT IF YOU ARE– DEFINE A FLAG GREAT DEAL IS A LOT THAT APPEARS LIKE A FLAG AS WELL AS IT HAS A POST WHICH IS A SMALL PARCEL THAT FRONTS ALONG THE STREET AS WELL AS EXTENDS BACK AND AFTER THAT THERE ' S A BUILDABLE LOCATION USUALLY BEHIND AS WELL AS EXISTING GREAT DEAL. SO THE FLAG IS THE COMPONENT OF THE BUILDABLE LOT LOCATION AND ALSO THE POST GENERALLY WORKS AS ACCESS.AS OF RIGHT NOW BUT THE POLES NEED TO GO TO LEAST 20 FEET WIDE AND WE ' RE LOOKING TO DECREASE THOSE POLE WIDTHS TO 12 FEET TO ENABLE EVEN MORE FLAG LOT POSSIBILITIES BUT ONCE MORE YOU WOULD BE LIMITED TO THE GREAT DEAL TO THE SIZE OF THE HOME AS WELL AS IT IN FACT FUFRNGSS AS A HOUSE OWNER HOMEOWNER POSSIBILITY THAT ' S REALLY SIMILAR IN LAYOUT OR SCALE TO AN ADU. YOU ' D HAVE AN ADVERTISEMENT NUSHGS REAR OF THE HOME OR SMALLER RESIDENCE ON SEPARATE LOT ON A FLAG LOT SO THAT ' S AN OPTION WE >> ' RE ALSO PROPOSING. VARIOUS OTHER THINGS WE ' VE MENTIONED SHORT SLI THE COTTAGE OR SOMETIMES CALLED POP NEIGHBORHOODS. THESE NEED OPEN SPACE AS WELL AS THE GROWTH OF HOUSING UNITS AROUND THE COMMON OPEN ROOM. I PUT ON ' T KNOW IF WE ' LL BE MOVING ON WITH THOSE ACTIVE TIME DUE TO THE NEED TO RESERVE LAND SIMPLY FOR OPEN AREA, NOT QUITER SURE THESE ARE VERY'REINFORCEMENT BUT URBAN TIR SETUP, BUT THEY ' LL BE EXPLORED WITH COMP STRATEGY AND ALSO SUCH.THERE ARE OTHER ADDITIONAL MODIFICATIONS THAT WE ' VE NOTED IN THE POSTERS AND ONLINE THAT I ' LL BE HAPPY TO RESPONSE FOR YOU. JUST WISHED TO PROVIDE YOU TIMELINE. RUB DISCUSSED THE TIMELINE WE ' RE DEALING WITH. WE ARE THIS IN THE KIND OF THE SECOND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCEDURE, LOSS 2018, AND ALSO CURRENTLY WE ' RE ALSO KIND OF MIXING MORE INTO THE DEVELOPING THE RECOMMENDED DRAFT. WE ' RE GOING TO TAKE CONSIDER'CONS AND ALSO FEEDBACK FROM ONLINE SURVEY. WE ' LL PROVIDE THAT TO YOU AT THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR YOUR INFORMATION. AND AFTER THAT WHEN YOU ' VE MADE RECOMMENDATION, WE ' LL TIMETABLE FOR ELECTED BODIES, WE ' RE SHOOTING FOR APRIL, MAY AT THE LATEST.THERE YOU ARE. GRATEFUL TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FOR YOU. > > THANK YOU. REALTY APPRECIATE THE THOROUGH PRESENTATION. QUESTIONS OR REMARKS? COMMISSIONER BRINE. > > BEFORE I START ON THE STRAIGHT QUESTION, IN THE DOCUMENTATION THAT UH YOU PROVIDED WITH REGARD TO DUPLEXES, YOU ASKED INDIVIDUALS IF THEY COULD RECOGNIZE A DUPLEX, YOU GAVE FOUR THINGS TO CHOICE FROM. 82%OF INDIVIDUAL YOU ASKED GOT IT WRONG. YOUR NEXT QUESTION WAS WHETHER OR NOT INDIVIDUALS WOULD BE COMFORTABLE HAVING A DUPLEX IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD. 60-SOMETHING%FIT AND 20%WERE FAIR, SOMETHING LIKE THAT. GENERALLY GREAT INQUIRY. MY MIND IF PEOPLE CAN ' T IDENTIFY DUPLEX WHEN THEY SEE IT, HOW ARE THEY GOING TO KNOW IF THEY ' RE GOING TO BE COMFY WITH IT IN THEIR AREA? > > THAT ' S THE WHOLE POINT IS THAT A GREAT DEAL OF FOLKS ARE WORRIED REGARDING THE DESIGN AND ESTHETICS AND HOW DUPLEXES STICK OUT IN YOUR AREA AS WELL AS IT JUST POINTS TO THE TRUTH THAT INDIVIDUALS GENERALLY– UNLESS THEY CONTAINER REALLY RESEARCH STUDY YOUR HOME AND SEE TWO CERTAIN DOORS WITH MAIL MAIL BOXES THAT THEY ' RE NOT GOING TO KNOW A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A SINGLE FAMILY MEMBERS AND ALSO A DUPLEX. > > OK. > > RAPIDLY, I THINK EVERYBODY ' S PROBABLY KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THIS BUT I WISH TO MAKE CERTAIN I GET IT ON THE RECORD. THERE ' S A LEGISLATION IN NORTH CAROLINA THAT FORBIDS United States FROM REGULATING THE APPEARANCE OF UNITS AS WELL AS I DO WANT TO SEE TO IT ON THE RECORD. ONCE MORE, ANY LAYOUT KRASHGTISTICS DUPLEX WOULD BE MORE PROBABLE TO BE FOUND IN SINGLE FAMILY TO HIGHLIGHT THE POINT MR. SUPPLY WAS MAKING. > > SECOND QUESTION, AS I PRESENTLY COMPREHEND IT, THE ONLY TOOK ON POLICY STATEMENT OR PO POLICY NEARBY IS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING 15 %IN THE AREAS AROUND STYLE AREAS AROUND THE TRANSIT TERMINALS.
WE DON ' T THINK THIS TASK WILL RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT REDUCTIONS IN HOUSING RATES, WHAT IT ' LL DO IS ALOU US OUR HOUSING UNIT MAINTAIN SPEED WITH POPULACE GROWTH AS WELL AS DEVELOPING IN THE PROCEDURES DEVELOP EVEN MORE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PEOPLE TO REMAIN IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS AS WELL AS LIVE IN DURHAM.YOU ' RE GOING HER EVEN MORE FROM MICHAEL BUT IN ADDITION TO THAT PURCHASING DOWN THE LADDER IMPACT, A WHOLE LOT OF MISSION BASED NON-PROFIT CONTRACTORS ALREADY HAVE LOTS OF LOFTS IN TOWN IN URBAN TIER AS WELL AS WITH THIS PROPOSITION USING AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE THICKNESS INCENTIVE CAN GO FROM ONE SYSTEM TO 2 DUPLEXES. WE ' VE TAKEN An APPEARANCE AT NUMBERS CURRENTLY ONTHE PUBLICATIONS FOR ZONING DISTRICTS AND ALSO USE THOSE FOR MODIFICATIONS AS YOU ' VE SEEN AND HOPEFULLY YOU ' VE SEEN IN DOCUMENTS AS WELL AS THROUGH OPEN HOUSES YOU ' VE SEEN THESE WAT WE ' RE PROPOSING AT THIS TIME TO CHANGE THEM DOWN BY ONE STEP.AND AFTER THAT DENSITY CHANGES ARE REALLY TO ALIGN THE WHOLE LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS WITH MAXIMUM DENSITY CONNECTED WITH THOSE HOOKING AT MAP AND ALSO MAKING SURE THOSE OPTIMUM DO NOT PROBLEM WITH FLUM DESTINATIONS. WE HEARD COMMENTS OR RATE OF INTEREST IN ALLOWING INDIVIDUALS TO DO– THERE ' S NO MINIMUM– THE ZONING DOES NOT NEED A MINIMAL RESIDENCE DIMENSION AND ALSO THERE ' S BEEN A LOT OF PASSION IN SMALL HOMES– NOT SPEAKING CONCERNING TINY HOMES, BUT SMALLER HOUSES AS WELL AS THAT THERE ' S NOT A REQUIRED FOR LARGER LO FOR A SMALLER RESIDENCE. I WEAR ' T KNOW IF WE ' LL BE MOVING ONWARD WITH THOSE ENERGETIC TIME BECAUSE OF THE REQUIREMENT TO SET ASIDE LAND JUST FOR OPEN ROOM, NOT QUITER SURE THESE ARE REALLY'REINFORCEMENT BUT URBAN TIR SETTING, BUT THEY ' LL BE CHECKED OUT VIA COMPENSATION STRATEGY AND SUCH.THERE ARE VARIOUS OTHER ADDITIONAL CHANGES THAT WE ' VE NOTED IN THE POSTERS AS WELL AS ONLINE THAT I ' LL BE THANKFUL TO RESPONSE FOR YOU. AS WELL AS AFTER THAT AS SOON AS YOU ' VE MADE REFERRAL, WE ' LL TIMETABLE FOR ELECTED BODIES, WE ' RE SHOOTING FOR APRIL, MAY AT THE LATEST.THERE YOU ARE.WHAT, IN THESE PROPOSALS, COMPARES TO ACQUIRING AFFORDABLE HOUSING THERE IF ANYTHING? >> > > THIS IS An EMPHASIS AROUND PRIMARILY THE URBAN RATE WHICH THERE ARE SOME, THE TRANS TERMINALS HAVE THEIR OWN DESIGNATION WHICH ARE THE COMPACT AREA TIER. >> > > SO THIS IS NOT LIKELY TO AID IN THE COMPACT AREA RATE, IS THAT WHAT I'' M HEARING YOU STATE? > >> WELL, WE RECOGNIZE THERE IS A SELECTION OF VARIOUS GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES AND ALSO OPTIONS WE CANISTER PROVIDE.WE BRIEFLY DISCUSSED IT ON ONE OF THE SLIDES THAT DURHAM ' S GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE A LOOK AT THERE ' S SOME STRUCTURE OUT CURRENTLY UH SEEN IN TYPICAL SUBURBAN ADVANCEMENT TOWARDS THE JS AND ALSO THAT ' S BECOMING EVEN THAT'IS STARTING TO BECOME MORE AND ALSO MORE EXPENSIVE AS LAND IS SIMPLY GENERALLY COMING TO BE AN INCREASING NUMBER OF EXPENSIVE AND TH DIFFICULTIES, THERE ' S NO EASY LAND AROUND TO DEELOP. THERE'' S GREAT DEALS OF ECOLOGICAL OBSTACLES SPECIFICALLY WITH THAT SAID LAND OR BUILDING UP WHICH IS HAVING A LOOK AT GENERALLY AROUND MIDTOWN IN WHICH YOUR COMPACT NEIGHBORHOOD TIERS AND AFTER THAT HAVING A LOOK AT WHT ASPECTS OF BUILDING IN CANISTER WE ACCOMPLISH. >> > > O.K.. ONE LAST QUESTION. THIS STUDENT WAS AVAILABLE IN SOUTH DURHAM. IF YOU'' RE NOT CAREFUL, WHAT IS LIKELY TO HAPPEN BASED ON SOME DEVELOPERS I'' VE TALKED WITH IS IF THEY CANISTER GET IT FROM THE PROPRIETORS THEY WANT THE TOWN HOMES. TOWN HALL SEEM TO BE RIGHT NOW. EXISTS ANY METHOD THAT THESE ADJUSTMENTS CAN MAYBE HELP INDIVIDUALS DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT, MAKE THINGS IN THIS LAND THAT'' S AVAILABLE MORE AFFORDABLE? >> > > I SUGGEST THAT ' S A DIFFICULT INQUIRY TO
ANSWER.I MEAN, LAND IS JUST GOING ENDING UP BEING INCREASINGLY MORE EXPENSIVE AND COMMUNITY RESIDENCES ARE PREFERRED BECAUSE, A, YOU TIN OFFER MORE UNITS BASED UPON THE LAND YOU'' RE PAYING FOR AS WELL AS IT'' S BUILT UNDER SAME DRN WHEN UH YOU GET TWO QUADS AS WELL AS SMLL APARTMENTS YOUR UNDER BUSINESS CODE AND STRIKING HOST OF ADDITIONAL REGULAR HATORY REQUIREMENTS. >> > > MANY THANKS. COMMISSIONER MILLER. >> > > AMONG THE POINTS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO UNDERSTAND IS THE– FORGIVE ME, PATRICK YOU MIGHT INTEND TO ACTION IN– IF I RECOGNIZE THE EXISTING PLAN FOR APPLY KABILITY IS GOING TO BE ANYTHING IN THE OPEN RATE EXCEPT FOR RS-20.
THE MOST SIGNIFICANT RS-20 I RECOGNIZE IS WOODLAND HILLS. >> > > NO INTEBT TO EXEMPT THAT COMMUNITY, THE INTENTION WAS TO APPLY TO THE URBAN RATE AS WELL AS TO THE URBAN RESIDENTIAL URBAN RU ZONING DISTRICTS SEVERAL OF WHICH ARE IN THE URBAN TIER. COMMISSIONER SALT WATER INQUIRED ABOUT PALSY. >> > > BUT WE ALSO HAVE RS ZONES IN– SO RS # AS WELL AS RS-10 REMAIN IN THE URBAN RATE AND ALSO WE'' RE APPLYING IT TO THAT. NOT APPLYING IT TO UNUSED LAND. IF I RECOGNIZE THIS PROPERLY, WHAT WOULD BE THE MAXIMUM ADVERTISEMENT NUSHGS RS-20. >> > > ADU STIPULATION WOULD RELATE TO ANY UH RESIDENTIAL. IT'' S NOT LIMITED.AS I TRIED TO EMPHASIZE IN MY COMMENTS, WE DESIRED TO ENSURE THESE PROPOSITIONS REMAINED IN CONTEXT AS WELL AS INC. MENTAL. 20 IS MUCH LESS DENSITY ZONING AREA AND ALSO FULL APPLICATION OF ALL OF THESE PROVISIONS WE DID ELUDE TO ADU STANDARDS AND SOME WOULD APPLY RS-20 BUT TO APPLY UH ALL CRITERIA WOULD RUN OUT CONTEXT. WE WANT COMMENTS ON THAT PARTICULAR. >> > > I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW RATIONALE IS. I'' M NOT ARGUING. >> > > SURE >>. > > SO I ALSO WANT TO UNDERSTAND THE– STRIKE THAT– THE ADU LOCATION PROPOSITION. AMONG MY BIGGEST CONCERNS BASED ON THE OLD WEST DURHAM EXPERIENCE IS THE IN A NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE THE LOTS ARE 50 BY 150 OR 50 BY 100 OR SMALLER AS WELL AS A PERSON DEVELOPS AN ADU YARD, IT CANISTER CONTROL THE BACKYARD PRIVACY IF YOUR HOUSE HAS IT ON EITHER SIDE. RESEMBLES YOU'' RE TRYING TO ADDRESS THAT TO MAKE CERTAIN AD SUSHGS CLOSER TO CONCEPT RESIDENCE. WHAT I DIDN'' T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ' RE CLAIMING ON THE POSTER FOR THAT, CONTAINER YOU EXPLAIN IT FOR ME SO I RECOGNIZE IT BETTER.
>> > > BIGGEST ADJUSTMENT WITH LOCATION DEMAND NOW THEY'' RE REQUIRED TO BE TO THE REAR OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. WHAT'WE ' RE PROPOSING IS TO ALLOW POSSIBILITY TOTHE SIDE. >> > > TO THE SIDE, DOYOU MEAN AROUND LITERALLY SIDEWAYS. >> > > THE SIDE OF IT. A NUMBER OF YOU HAVE SEEN SEPARATED GARAGES THAT ARE SIDEWAYS OF A RESIDENCE, SO WE'' RE LOOKING TO MAKE THAT ALLOCATION ALLY TO ADUs. GENERALLY PROPOSING IS TO THE BACK HALF OF YOUR HOME SO IT'' S NOT RIGHT UP FRONT WITH THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. >> > > THAT ' S THE PART I DIDN'' T UNDERSTAND. WHAT ' S THE BACK FIFTY PERCENT? >> > WALK DOWN TE SIDE OF YOUR HOUSE YOU HAVE FRONT HALF AS WELL AS BACK HALF. >> > > OKAY >>. > > WHEN WE BRING MESSAGE WITH YOU, WE'' RE HAVING A HARD TIME WIH THE APPROPRIATE WORDING FOR THAT TOO BUT THAT'' S GENERAL THINK SUGGESTION. >> > > MY OWN PREFERENCE ADUs IS THEY BE UP CLOSER TO THE FRAMEWORK TO WHICH THEY'' RE ACCESSORIZED, THEREFORE THE BACKYARDS ARE COST-FREE SINCE I BELIEVE THAT'' S WHAT NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBOR SUBJECT TO.ALSO REQUIRING TRUTH AND ALSO I PUT ON'' T UNDERSTAND, STRUGGLING BY THE TREE TO BE HOME WINDOW DRESSING TO ME.RS – LINE UP WITH THE SCENARIO OF IN WHICH ON A SMALL GREAT DEAL YOU TIN HAVE A DEEP BREAK AND ADU AND LIKEWISE REQUIRE A TREE IN THE BACKYARD NOT GOING TO HAVE MUCH ROOM FOR IT. I'' M UNCERTAIN I COMPREHEND IT, WHAT IF THE TREE DIES? >> ZONING INFRACTION? > > YEAH. THE TREE DEMAND IS ACTUALLY STOLEN FROM THE OLD WEST DURHAM. >> > > AND'I ' M NOT MAKING ENJOYABLE, I ' M WORRIED ABOUT– > > TREE DEMAND– SO WHAT THE TREE NEED DOES IS PAIR THINGS.A, IT HELPS ADDRESS POTENTIAL LOSS OF TREE CAN P PI WHICH IF YOU'' RE GOING ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT YOU'' RE GOING LOSE TREES. YOU ' LL BE SEEING ACTUALLY A SEPARATE ZONING MESSAGE AMENDMENT WHICH BRINGS MORE TREE INSURANCE COVERAGE NEEDS AND SUCH NEXT MONTH ALSO. BUT WHAT IT ALSO DOES IS BEGIN TO REDUCE OR PREVENT ADDED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA, SO IF YOU HAVE TO HAVE A TREE OR PROGRAM EITHER RETAIN A TREE OR PLANT ONE, YOU BEGIN TO REQUIRED A LITTLE LESS IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. PAIRED LIKEWISE WITH THE DRIVEWAY REQUIREMENTS, MINIMIZING SIZE OF THE DRIVEWAY. >> > > DRIVEWAY DEMAND WAS MAKE SENSE, I WAS HAVING TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING HOW THE TREE POINT WAS GOING TO FUNCTION. >> > > TREE WAS REAL LAY STRAIGHTFORWARD BUT EFFECTIVE WAY OF TRYING TO PRESENT MORE TREE CANISTER AND ALSO A REALLY EASY WAY OF DOING IT THAT'' S UNDERSTANDABLE TO ANYBODY THAT'' S LOOKING TO JUST CONSTRUCT A RESIDENCE OR AN ADU OR SOMETHING. > > TREE IS GOING TO SPEAK ABOUT TREE CONTAINER SPOI THIS HAS GOT TO BE A COVER TREE. >> > > TREE COVER WE'' RE TALKING ABOUT EITHER UNDERSTORY OR CANOPY TREE BECAUSE THERE ARE DIFFERENT PLANTING LOCATION NEEDS AS WELL AS LIABILITIES FOR HEALTH.ALSO UNDERSTAND WE HAVE CURRENT STREET REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED ON PRIVATE HOME SO THOSE ARE LIKEWISE CURRENTLY EVALUATED AND IMPOSED, SO REALLY IT ' S JUST ADDING AN ADDED CHECK BOX TO SEE IF THERE ' S A TREE THERE WHETHER MAINTAINED OR PLANTED. > > AND AFTER THAT IN FILL STANDARD POINT, IF I COMPREHEND IT APPROPRIATELY TODAY, THE IN FILL CRITERIA BASED UPON THE IDEA OF TURN PROBLEMATIC WRITTEN INTO THE CODE, LOTS AS WELL AS GREAT DEALS OF THEM [INDISCERNIBLE] IF I UNDERSTAND IT CORRECTLY IN FILL RESIDENCE IN THERE HAS TO BE [BASICALLY STATES INDISCERNIBLE] SOMEHOW TO THE STANDARD HEIGHTS OF SOMEHOW OF YOUR HOMES ON THE BLOCK BASE, BUT IF YOU HAVE GREATER THAN 25 SEPARATION FROM NEAREST HOUSE YOU INCLUDE 14 FEET TO THAT STANDARD FIGURE AS LONG AS YOU PUT ON ' T MAX OUT 85 FEET NEED; IS THAT RIGHT, THAT ' S THE CURRENT? > > NO, LITTLE BIT DIFFERENTLY AND THAT ' S WHY WE ' RE CHANGING IT.YOUR HELD TO EITHER THE ZONING HEIGHT OR 1 FEET WHICHEVER IS LESSER. THAT 25 FOOT YO ' RE TALKING ABOUT IS DUMPING THAT 14 FOOT HAT, PER SE.
SO WE ' RE CLARIFYING HOW AS WELL AS ACTION YOU COMPARE THE ELEVATION TO– > > 35 FOOT IS'DEMAND NO ISSUE WHAT. > > IT ALSO REQUIRES YOU WHAT WOULD BE THE LESSER. IF THE LESSER IS WHAT IS– > > AREA OF ONE STORY HOUSES AS WELL AS> UNDER THE CURRENT GUIDELINES YOU CAN ' T CONSTRUCT ANYTHING CONSIDERABLE OR LARGER THAN A ONE STORY HOME UNLESS YOU ' VE GOT 25 FOOT SPLITTING UP>;? > > NO. YOU CA ADD, IT PERMITS AN ADDITIONAL TALE, 14 FEET GIVES YOU AN'ADDED TALE. > > REALLY NOT A STANDARD ADVANCEMENT [INDISCERNIBLE] BECAUSE AVERAGE SINGLE FAMILY MEMBERS LOCAL UNLESS FLAT ROOF COVERING IS SAY ROUND 18-22 FEET. YOU ' RE SETTING [INDISTINCT]>. THIS IS JUST SQUANDERED PAPER IN THE CODE. > > WE CONTAINER TAKE A LOOK AT IT. THAT ' S A COMMENT WE ' D LIKE TO LEARN THROUGH. > > I PUT ON ' T THINK'OUR USUAL CRITERIA ARE– IF JEFF WAS STRUCTURE THAT CREATED A LOT LEGISLATION THERE UNDER EXISTING IN FILL SPECIFICATIONS TO>> DEVELOP AN MPO FOR THEM, OUR IN FILL'SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT SPECIFICATIONS. >> THAT ' S MY MONITORING. YOU PUT ON ' T HAVE TO RESPOND. > > I UH WASN ' T GOING TO. [GIGGLING] > > I WANT TO HAVE BECAUSE COMPONENT OF YOUR DISCUSSION, PATRICK, IS THAT'WE WISH TO SAFEGUARD THE CHARACTER OF NEIGHBORHOODS AS WELL AS DO THAT WITH IB FILL SPECIFICATIONS BUT I PUT ON ' T THINK WE HAVE IN FILL STANDARDS.WE ' RE TALKING ABOUT PRODUCTION RELAXING THEM BUT IT ' S ONLY A PAIR FEET OFF THE MAXIMUM IS ANYWAY. IT ' S MORE OF An IRRITATION THAN PERSONALITY DEFENSE AND ALSO I ' M ALL FOR CHECKING CHARACTER, I ' M VERSUS LAW FOR THE FUNCTION OR E EFFECTIVE MERELY IR'STATING. > > APPRECIATE YOUR POIT. WE DO TAKE THE NEED TO PROTECT CONTEXT EXTREMELY SERIOUSLY. WE ALSO CONCERN CANDIDLY, THAT AN INDIVIDUAL PROTECTION OVER LAY IS GREAT TOOL FOR AREA BUT COLLECTIVELY GRADUALLY LIKE CHURCH HILLSIDE AND ALSO RALEIGH WHO HAVE EVEN MORE THAN A DOZEN, IT ENDS UP BEING CONSIDERABLE CONSTRAIN ON HOUSING SUPPLY AS WELL AS AFFORDABILITY.WE THINK IT ' S REALLY IMPORTANT IF YOU COULD HELP US, WERE ALL EARS, TRULY, TO CRAFT REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE CONSIDERABLE SIGNIFICANT IN FILL SPECIFICATIONS THAT ARE AMRIBLG AND DEFENSIBLE THAT COULD BE APPLIED THROUGHOUT BAN RIGHT HERE TO ENABLES– THROUGHOUT URBAN RATE. WE STRUGGLE DAILY TO SHOT
TO DISCOVER THAT'. IT APPEARS LIKE YOU SEEM LIKE WE ' VE MISSED THE MARK. WE ' D LOVE YOUR INP PUT ON SPECIFICATIONS WE COULD APPLY BROADLY THAT WOULD GET THAT DEEPER LEVEL OF NEIGHBORHOOD BUY IN. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT ALL COMMUNITIES ARE BATTLING WITH. NORTH CAROLINA HAS MADE IT MUCH, MUCH HARDER BY NOT ALLOWING US TO MANAGE LAYOUT O STYLE. I ' M A FOLLOWER THAT IF YOU STYLE STYLE WE COULD OBTAIN 90%OF THE WAY THERE. > > I UNDERSTAND THAT AS WELL AS I WANT TO MAKE MY FINAL POINT. I AM WORRIED THAT BY DOING EVERY ONE OF THIS BY-RIGHT, EXCLUDES ORDINARY INDIVIDUALS INTERESTED IN WHOLE PLANNING PROCEDURE IS THE HOUSE THEY BUY O IN WHICH THEY LIVE FROM HAVING ACTIVE ONGOING SAY IN THEIR CREATING REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT.ZONING VIABLE ONLY IF IT SAFEGUARDS THE GENERAL PUBLIC WELFARE BUT MAKE IT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE GENERAL PUBLIC CONTAINER ' T GET INVOLVED EFFECTIVELY AT THE SAME TIMES AND ALSO WE ' VE BEEN GREAT AT THIS, WE ' VE REDUCED PUBLIC COMING TO THESE HEARINGS AND CLAIMING NO– DO THAT ANYMORE, I CHALLENGE THAT.
A FEW OF THESE SPECIAL THINK DUKE PLACE PROPOSAL NOT HAVING An USE AUTHORIZATION WHICH AFTER THAT WOULD PERMITTED A DROESZ IMPOSE CONDITION– WORRY ABOUT THIS WHOLE POINT TO GO AWAY. AS LONG AS'ORDINARY INDIVIDUALS WOULD HAVE A SNA THE METHOD THEY OFFERED CHANGE. USAGE PERMIT COME UP AS WELL AS SAY I PUT ON ' T SIMILAR TO THIS AND BOARD OF CHANGE SAY DON ' T WORK WITH INDIVIDUALS [INDISCERNIBLE] DIDN ' T LIKE IT, THAT ' S NOT OUR REASON FOR TURNING IT DOWN, BUT I THINK WE CAN HAE STANDARDS, PARTICULARLY AS IT CONNECTS TO COMPATIBILITY AND CAR PARKINGS AND OTHER CONCERNS WE CURRENTLY ADDRESS IN OUR REQUIREMENTS FOR'USE PERMITS.—- ALSO ALLOW ORDINARY PEOPLE TO'CONTINUE HAVE HAVE A HAND ON THE GUIDING WHEEL IN ZONING and also planning ENVIRONMENT.THAT ' S MY BIGGEST ISSUE. > > THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS AND ALSO COMMISSIONER BAKERER AND AFTER THAT COMMISSIONER AL-TURK. > > I NEGLECTED. > > WE ' LL COME BACK TO YOU AND IF YOU REMEMBER. COMMISSIONER BAKER. > > I BELIEVE THIS IS REALLY GOOD FUNCTION, REALLY IMPORTANT FUNCTION. >> I UH DEFINITELY ASSISTANCE THE SPIRIT OF THE WHAT YOU ' RE DOING. DISADVANTAGE TICKET WALL SURFACE COMPATIBILITY CRITERIA >> I BELIEVE, ARE SOMETHING THAT MIGHT REQUIRED TO BE DUG INTO EVEN MORE. >> I DO THINK IT ' S POSSIBLE TO INCREASE DENSITY AND IN FILL SITUATIONS WITHOUT SPOILING CHARACTER OF NEIGHBORHOODS. I ASSUME WE COULD ACTUALLY IMPROVE CHARACTER OF AREA, A GREAT DEAL OF OUR FAVORITE NEIGHBORHOODS IN THE CITY ARE NEIGHBORHOODS WITH VARIETY REAL ESTATE TYPES THAT TEND TO BE HISTORIC. I DO THINK SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THIS WILL POSSIBLY EXPERIENCE, WILL BE PASSED AND ALSO END UP BEING NEIGHBORHOOD REGULATION. I DO THINK UH THERE WILL BE DEVELOPERS AVAILABLE THAT WILL CAPITALIZE IN ORDER TO DEVELOP REGIONAL GROWTH SO ANTICIPATING TO THE BEST EXTENT FEASIBLE MAKING SURE WE ' RE LOOKING AHEAD TO AS HIGH AS WE CONTAINER REALLY IMPORTANT HAVE SOMETHING SOME OF THE IMPORTANT THINGS THAT COMMISSIONER MILLER DISCUSSED, MAYBE REASONING ABOUT HOW CANISTER WE MAYBE NOT MAKE EVERYTHING BY RIGHT BUT SAY YOU WISH TO GO UP TO 2 OR THREE OR FOUR SYSTEMS, RIGHT HERE ' S WHAT YOU REQUIRED TO PROVIDE.I DON ' T KNOW QUITE SUFFICIENT ABOUT THE REGULATIONS IN STIPULATIONS OF WHAT IS ACTUALLY ALIGNED WITH DESIGN CRITERIA. , if THERE ' S SOME OF OF INCENTIVIZING HIGHER DENSITY THROUGH LAYOUT REQUIREMENTS.. NATURALLY IT ' S MOTIVATION FOR AREA TO ALLOW NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBOR SOMETHING THAT ' S HIGHER DENSITY 4 OR
FIVE SYSTEMS OR MORE WITH LAYOUT SPECIFICATIONS IF THAT ' S POSSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT MIGHT BE A MEANS OF ENCOURAGING INDIVIDUALS TO ASSISTANCE THIS'. IT LOOKS LIKE EVERY ONE OF THIS IS DWA DW DW DW DWAERED TAILORED TOWARDS IN FILL. I QUESTION– A LOT OF PEOPLE BEING PUSHED OUT OF IN FILL AREAS.I DON ' T KNOW IF YOU CANISTER TALK TO ANYTHING THAT PERTAINS ABOUT COMMUNITY DESOIN REQUIREMENTS. > > WE ' RE LOOKING TO ADJUSTMENT THE CROSS CLASS NEED WHICH IS WE ' RE SEEING A GREAT DEAL MORE ASK FOR AS WELL AS PRESERVATION TO ENABLE MORE RANGE OF REAL ESTATE TYPES TO BE PROVIDE WITHIN THOSE GROWTHS, PARTICULARLY DUPLEXES THROUGHOUT EVEN WITH CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS COMMUNITY HOUSES TOO. CURRENTLY HAVE THOROUGHFARE DENSITY BONUS THAT PERMITS TOWN HOUSES. I BELIEVE THIS COULD BE EVEN MORE URBAN TIER, I COULD BE'MISDOING. THIS IS THE ONE PLACE WHERE WE ARE PRESENTING MULTIPLEX CHOICE. MULTIPLEXES ARE CURRENTLY A HOUSING ALTERNATIVE WITHIN UDO, JUST SMALL STRUCTURES, PROPOSING THEM ALONG MJOR THOROUGHFARES AS WELL AS BOULEVARDS, SO WE ' RE STARTING TO CHECK OUT THAT. I ASSUME WHEN WE GO THROUGH THE COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY PROCEDURES AS WELL AS HAVE A LOOK AT HOW DURHAM SEES ITSELF GROWING IN NEXT COUPLE DECADES WE ' LL HAVE BETTER DEAL WITH ON WHERE TO PRESENT THESE EVEN EVEN MORE VARIOUS MORE EXTREME REAL ESTATE KINDS, THE 3 OR FIVE-UNIT HOUSING, GARDEN-STYLE HOUSES, AND AFTER THAT LIKEWISE PRESENT CONNECTED DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR THOSE TOO BECAUSE WE DO ANTICIPATE THERE WILL CERTAINLY BE SOME CHANGES TO THE ORDINANCE ONCE THE DETAILED PLAN IS TAKEN ON. > > SWIFTLY ADD ON TO WHAT MICHAEL CLAIMED. I BELIEVE COMMISSIONER BAKERER AS WELL AS MILLER AS I PROMISED COMMISSIONER MILLER WE WILL TAKE A DIFFICULT CHECK OUT THE IN FILL REQUIREMENTS AND N PRODUCTION SURE WE GO AS MUCH AS E WE CANISTER UNDER LAW TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT THEY ARE PROTECTIVE O EXISTING CHARACTER, BUT IN REQUISITES OF– AS WELL AS WE ' LL CONTINUE TO EXAMINE– ALL RIGHT DONE WORK CONSIDERING CITIES AND ATTORNEY ' S OFFICE TO EXAMINATION WORLD OF WHAT ' S FEASIBLE AND LEGAL. IT ' S LEGITIMATELY FEASIBLE TO MAKE A LOT OF WHAT YOU LEARNT THROUGH MICHAEL APPROVAL FOR USAGE LICENSE OR OTHER PROCESS. WE HAVE WRAPPED UP THAT SINCE OF LIMITATIONS ON THE LAYOUT IN STATE LAW AND SINGLE FAMILY AS WELL AS TWO FAMILY THERE ' S NO DISTINCTION IN BETWEEN ONE AND 2 FAMILY BESIDES ENABLING SOMEONE TO DEVELOP 100%EVEN MORE REAL ESTATE CHANCES IF THEY ' RE ABLE TO BUILD A DUPLEX, WHICH ' S WHY WE PLACE ' T FELT IT WAS REQUIRED OR NEEDED TO HAVE A SUPPLEMENTAL USAGE LICENSE AT THAT.BUT WE WILL CERTAINLY TAKE A LOO -JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW WHERE WE ' RE'AT, PRESENTLY AND APPRECIATE YOUR RESPONSES AND ALSO INVESTIGATE THAT FURTHER. > > MANY THANKS. COMMISSIONER AL-TURK. > > THANK YOU. CONCERN ABOUT THE STUDY. DO YOU HAVE A SENSE OF'HOW REPRESENTATIVE IT IS OF THE POPULACE AS A WHOLE IN REGARDS TO EARNINGS, race, as well as location? >
> THE ONE OVER THE SUMMER? > > YEAH. > > THE ONE OVER THE SUMMER SEASON WE'DID NOT ASK THOSE CONCERNS. > > OKAY. > > IF M RECOLLECTION AND ALSO ONCE MORE IT ' S RECOLLECTION >> SO DON ' T HOLD ME TO IT, USUALLY RATHER> BAD, THOSE REACTIONS WEREN ' T ABLE TO TRACK WHERE INDIVIDUALS LIVED OR WHERE THEY WERE ACCESSING IT FROM AND IT WAS SOMEWHAT BY RECOLLECTION RATHER AGENT AROUND DIFFERENT> AREAS OF DURHAM AND OUTSIDE >> OF DURHAM TOO IT EVEN HIT PLACES IN EUROPE TOO, ODDLY. [> GIGGLING] IT WAS PRETTY AGENT'THROUGHOUT. > > I SIMPLY WISHED TO ENSURE 70% OF PEOPLE ARE FINE WITH DUPLEXES BUT IT ' S NOT BECAUSE THEY ALL STAY IN SANDY PARK OR– I HAVE A COUPLE SMALL QUESTIONS.ONE ON THE ADUs. THIS WAS AMONG THINGS ABOUT MPO THAT I DID NOT LIKE WHICH IS THE 800 SQUARE FOOT OPTIMUM. MAKE IT MORE ADAPTABLE BY REMOVING 30 %BUT THAT ' S LIKEWISE MAKING IT MORE ARE RESTRICTIVE. IF AMONG THE OBJECTIVES IS TO MAKE ADUs Even More PROINENT >>, NOT SIMPLY IN URBAN CORE BUT THROUGHOUT, THEN I ' M NO CERTAIN WHAT ' S THE POINT OF COVERING IT AT 100 RATHER THAN BOOSTING PERCENT OR POSSIBLY DOING IT
TO WHERE IT ' S URBAN RATE IT ' S OPTIMUMS OF 800, SOME OTHER THINGS YOU GO UP TO A THOUSAND OR 1,200 OR SOMETHING? > > WE CAN EXPLORE THAT'. I THINK WHAT WAS CRITICAL WE THOUGHT WAS HAVING A SET OPTIMUM TO MAKE SURE THAT THE INDUSTRY ENGINEERS, DESIGNERS AS WELL AS SMALL BUILDERS COULD HAVE A STANDARDIZED STRATEGY THAT THEY COULD USAGE IN COLLABORATING WITH NEIGHBORHOOD PHASE ON AHEAD WITH STANDARD DESIGN FOR THE 800 SQUARE FEET UNIT, BUT IN REQUISITES OF– OUR AMONG OUR PRIMARY CONCERNS TO THE COMMENT THAT IS MR.MILLER AS WELL AS BAKER MADE WAS ENSURING THAT ADUs REMAIN DEVICE. WE DID DO SOME INVESTIGATE AND ALSO RESEARCH TO PROGRAM THAT IF YOU ' VE GOT A NEIGHBORHOOD PRIMARY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ONCE KWU YOU OVERCOME A SQUARE VIDEO LOOKING AND ALSO SEEMING LIKE A 2ND PRIMARY STRUCTURE. WE ' LL REMAIN TO CHECK OUT THAT WHERE THERE ' S MUCH LARGER LOTS WE COULD DO THAT HOWEVER, FOR URBAN RATE WE FEEL HIGHLY FOR 800. > > MANY THANKS. THE VARIOUS OTHER CONCERNS REGARDING
DUPLEXES.NOW UH I TIN ' T REMEMBER EXACTLY BUT FROM WHAT– SO THE FOCUS IS ON DUPLEXES OR CHANGING SOME LAWS WITHIN THE URBAN TIER, BUT AGAIN IT ' S A FACTOR NOT TO EXTEND THAT TO THE RURAL TIER. I OBTAIN THAT A LOT OF INDIVIDUALS IN THOSE COMMUNITIES ARE GOING TO BE AGAINST DUPLEXES BUT WHY– SPECIFICALLY IF THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS LIKE THE RS-10 AND ALSO 8, WHY NOT ENABLE DUPLEXES THERE? > > >> WE COULD TAKE A LOOK AT THAT AS WELL. I THINK I THERE WERE TWO PRIMARY REASONS. ONE'IS SOMETHING I TRY UHHED TO THWART TO IN MY DISCUSSION IS DESIRED TO REALLY I CONCENTRATES THESE ADJUSTMENTS WHERE THE GREATEST NEED WAS AND TREMENDOUS DIFFERENTIAL MULTIP APPROXIMATELIES IN STIPULATIONS OF PER SQUARE FOOT URBAN TIER A GREAT DEAL OF THESE NEIGHBORHOODS ARE SUR BURR INTOON WE FELT LIKE THE UTIZATION OF THIS ACCESSIBILITY WOULD BE HIGHER. SECOND IS THAT SUBURBAN RATE THERE ' S A MUCH HIGHER INCIDENCE >> OF FUNCTIONAL RESIDENCE OWNERS ORGANIZATIONS WITH LIMITING COMMITMENTS THAT FEATURE [INDISCERNIBLE] WOULD LIKELY EVEN IF YOUR ZONING ALLOWED IT WOULD PROHIBIT OR AVERT THE USE OF THAT.MANY OF TESE COVENANTS NEIGHWIDE ARE SOMETHING THAT RESTRICT HOUSE SUPPLY INCREASES USES COST PROHIBIT ASIDE FROM SINGLE HOUSEHOLD DEVICES. > > SO MAYBE THE BIGGER QUESTIO I UH HAVE YOU ' RE NT FOCUSING ON MULTIPLEXES AT THIS TERMINAL AND ALSO PAT YOU ADDITIONALLY CLAIMED THIS IS JEBT L APPROACH, I GUESS THE INQUIRY IS, BECAUSE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PRESENTATION IT PRACTICALLY APPEARED LIKE END OFTHE WORLD LIKE WE ' VE GOT MANY INDIVIDUALS IN DURHAM AND WE DON ' T HAVE SUFFICIENT SUPPLY. SO WHY TAKE MILD L TECHNIQUE, WHY NOT CONCENTRATE ON MULTIPLEXES CONTAINER YOU TALK THROUGH THE THINKING? > > 2 PRIMARY REASONS. SOMEBODY USEFUL AND ONE IS PHILOSOPHICAL.WE THNK IT ' S REALLY VITAL TO HAVE GREATER LEVEL ALTHOUGH WE THINK WE ' VE DONE A GOOD TASK OVER LAST FEW MONTHS GREATER COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT TALKING TO THEM AS WELL AS LISTENING TO THEM ABOUT THE PROBLEM. WE PRESENTED IT TO YOU TONIGHT TO ENSURE THAT WE CANISTER OBTAIN A HIGHER DEGREE OF BUY IN FROM THE BROADSER AREA ON THOSE BIGGER SALE OPTIONS, THE YARD APARTMENTS AND ALSO FOUR PLEXES. WE THINK UH THE DETAILED STRATEGY IS A SIGNIFICANT CAR TO PERFORM THAT [INDISCERNIBLE] ASSISTANCE US COMMUNICATION AS WELL AS OUTREACH AS WELL AS BE ABLE TO ESSENTIALLY TELL THIS STORY MAYBE THAN I UH HAVE TONIGHT IN MORE PLACES IN THE AREA PRIOR TO WE PROPOSE'THOSE ADJUSTMENT WHICH CAN BE PERCEIVED. 2ND FACTOR IS PRACTICAL. ZONING IS ONLY ONE ITEM OF THE PROBLEM. THE OTHER PIECES ARE THINGS LIKE STORMWATER NEEDS, ROADWAY CRITERIA RQUIRE CERTAIN WIDTH OF ROADWAYS FOR TRASH TRUCKS AS WELL AS FIRE ENGINE TURN-AROUNDS AS WELL AS UTILITY REQUIREMENTS THAT OUR TEAMED BELIEVE IF WE GO TO THREE PLEXES, 4 PLEXES OR GARDEN APARTMENTS WE HAVE TO APPEARANCE A THESE OTHER CRITERIA AND ALSO ENSURE WE HAVE FIRE EQUIPMENT THAT CONTAINER GO INTO SMALLER HIGHWAYS AND ALSO SERVICE THESE HIGHER INTENSITY AREAS.WE NEED TO CONSIDER HOW WE MANAGE OUR STORMWATER SPECIFICATIONS THAT PRESENTLY HAVE TO BE ON-SITE. BECAUSE OF THESE OTHER LAWS HAMPERING THAT, WE FELT LIKE IF WE DID PRESS FOR EVEN MORE INTENSE VARIETY OF USES IN MORE PLACES WE WOULDN ' T BE ABLE TO CARRY OUT THEM. MAKE SENSE? > > HELPFUL. THANK YOU. > > I UH KNOW THE HR IS LATE. I DID WANT TO SAY PAIR QUICK THINGS AS WE COVER UP. RUB, I ' M THANKFUL YOU RAISED THE STORMWATER STANDARDS. THE CONCERN IS SOMETHING WE ARE NEED TO WATCH ON ALONG WITH THE TRE CANISTER P PI PROBLEM UH WHICH YOU ' RE WORKING TO ADDRESS IN THIS PROPOSAL. I ' VE BEEN EXCITED WITH THE EQUILIBRIUM OF ACQUIRING PUBLIC FEEDBACK BUT TRYING TO MOVE THIS VIA RAPIDLY P.FOUND THE BALANCE. SOMETHING TO CONCENTRATE ON IS THE POST– IF THIS DOES GO FORWARD AS WELL AS GET AUTHORIZED WE HAVE TO STRIVE TO SEE TO IT WE REMAIN TO ENLIGHTEN the public and engage OR WE ' LL SEE WHAT WE SAW WITH PINE CREST IN WHICH INDIVIDUALS WERE APPEARING AND ALSO STATING WHEN DID THIS HAPPEN THAT OUR COMMUNITY ALTERED THE RATE WE ' RE> IN AND WENT VIA OBVIOUSLY VERY INTENSIVE PUBLIC PROCEDURE BUT IT ' S EASY TO SURVIVE THE PROCESS AND SAY WE ' VE MADE IT BUT WE REQUIREMENT TO MAKE CERTAIN WE ' RE EDUCATING COMMUNITY TO UNDERSTAND THE MODIFICATIONS THAT ARE COMING HEE.
> > TREE COVER WE'' RE TALKING ABOUT EITHER UNDERSTORY OR COVER TREE BECAUSE THERE ARE VARIOUS PLANTING AREA DEMANDS AND OBLIGATIONS FOR HEALTH.ALSO UNDERSTAND WE HAVE CURRENT STREET CRITERIA THAT ARE REQUIRED ON PRIVATE BUILDING SO THOSE ARE ALSO PRESENTLY EXAMINED AND ENFORCED, SO REALLY IT ' S SIMPLY INCLUDING AN ADDITIONAL CHECK BOX TO SEE IF THERE ' S A TREE THERE WHETHER MAINTAINED OR PLANTED. > > I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE BECAUSE COMPONENT OF YOUR DISCUSSION, PATRICK, IS THAT'WE NEED TO SHIELD THE CHARACTER OF NEIGHBORHOODS AS WELL AS DO THAT WITH IB FILL CRITERIA BUT I PUT ON ' T THINK WE HAVE IN FILL STANDARDS.WE ' RE TALKING ABOUT PRODUCTION RELAXING THEM BUT IT ' S ONLY A PAIR FEET OFF THE MAXIMUM IS ANYWAY. I DO THINK UH THERE WILL BE DEVELOPERS OUT THERE THAT WILL TAKE ADVANTAGE IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT NEIGHBORHOOD GROWTH SO ANTICIPATING TO THE BEST EXTENT POSSIBLE MAKING CERTAIN WE ' RE LOOKING AHEAD TO AS MUCH AS WE CONTAINER REALLY IMPORTANT HAVE SOMETHING SOME OF THE POINTS THAT COMMISSIONER MILLER TALKED ABOUT, MAYBE THINKING ABOUT HOW CANISTER WE MAYBE NOT MAKE EVERYTHING BY RIGHT BUT SAY YOU WANT TO GO UP TO 2 OR 3 OR FOUR SYSTEMS, RIGHT HERE ' S WHAT YOU REQUIRED TO PROVIDE.I DON ' T KNOW QUITE SUFFICIENT ABOUT THE LEGISLATION IN REQUISITES OF WHAT IS ACTUALLY ALIGNED WITH DESIGN STANDARDS. > > SO MAYBE THE BIGGER QUESTIO I UH HAVE YOU ' RE NT FOCUSING ON MULTIPLEXES AT THIS STATION AND ALSO PAT YOU ADDITIONALLY STATED THIS IS JEBT L METHOD, I PRESUME THE QUESTION IS, DUE TO THE FACT THAT AT THE BEGINNING OF THE DISCUSSION IT NEARLY APPEARED LIKE DOOMSDAY LIKE WE ' VE GOT SO LOTS OF PEOPLE IN DURHAM AND WE DON ' T HAVE SUFFICIENT SUPPLY. SOMETHING TO FOCUS ON IS THE BLOG POST– IF THIS DOES GO FORWARD AND ALSO GET ACCEPTED WE HAVE TO FUNCTION HARD TO MAKE CERTAIN WE CONTINUE TO ENGAGE AND ENLIGHTEN THE PUBLIC OR WE ' LL SEE WHAT WE SAW WITH PINE CREST IN WHICH INDIVIDUALS WERE REVEALING UP AND ALSO STATING WHEN DID THIS HAPPEN THAT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ALTERED THE TIER WE ' RE> IN AND WENT THROUGH OBVIOUSLY VERY EXTENSIVE PUBLIC PROCEDURE BUT IT ' S EASY TO GET THROUGH THE PROCESS AND SAY WE ' VE MADE IT BUT WE NEED TO MAKE SURE WE ' RE EDUCATING COMMUNITY TO UNDERSTAND THE ADJUSTMENTS THAT ARE COMING HEE.I BELIEVE I WE'' RE STUNNING WONDERFUL EQUILIBRIUM IN REQUISITES NOT RELOCATING TOO PROMPTLY UH BUT WE– YOU'' RE GOING HEAR A LOT IF INDIVIDUALS SEE THE INDIVIDUALS as well as changes DIDN'' T UNDERSTAND AND ALSO MISSED THIS INTERACTION PROCESS.I ' M HOPING
THERE WILL CERTAINLY BE A POST EDUCATION PROCEDURES THAT THE TEAM COULD HANG OUT THINKING ABOUT. KEEPING THAT CLAIMED, I DON'' T SEE ANY EXTRA COMMENTS– COMMISSIONER– LET'' S KEEP THEM FAST BECAUSE THE HOUR IS LATE. >> > > I UH IDEA THE PRESENTATION WAS REMARKABLE AND ALSO ADDRESS PROBLEMS IN REGARDS TO Location ADUs AND– SOMETHING THAT MAKES IT TOUGH FOR STANDARD ADULT IS NAVIGATING STAIRS. HAVING THE ABILITY TO DEVELOP ATMOSPHERE TO MAINTAIN DURHAM RESIDENTS. MOST OF THE RESISTANCE WE RECEIVE ARE FROM THOSE THAT ARE OVER 50 AND OVER 40 AND ALSO I'' M COMING CLOSE TO 40 MYSELF AND I RECOGNIZE A GREAT DEAL OF MY PEERS THAT ARE LIFERS IN DURHAM AS I AM, THE QUESTION PERTAINS TO ME OFTEN AS WELL AS IT'' S AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE BUT AFFORDABLE FOR'WHO? I ' VE BEEN IN DURHAM MY WHOLE LIFE, WHAT ARE THEY DOING FOR US.WE ' VE SUR PROOI VOOIFED REAL ESTATE AS WELL AS– ENDURED RESIDENCE AS WELL AS ECONOMIC DILEMMA. BECAUSE IT WILL AID INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE VESTED BELOW AS WELL AS THEY WANT TO CONTINUE TO BE RIGHT HERE, obtaining THAT INP PUT WOULD BE INVALUABLE. THEN WE DON'' T HAVE THESE CHANGES AS A RESULT OF THE GROWTH DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE GOT TO LOCATE BALANCE CONCERNING HOW DOES GROWTH AS WELL AS A RETENTION COHABITATE IN SME AREA AND ALSO THAT SUMS UP A MINIMUM OF WHAT I SEEN THROUGHOUT MY TENURE RIGHT HERE.
>> > > THANK YOU. >>. > > THAT ' S AS BRIEF AS I COULD MAINTAIN IT >>. > > THAT WAS QUICK. >> COMMISSIONER GIBBS. > > THIS WILL BE BRIEF. YOU DISCUSSED STORMWATER. EVERY TIME I LISTEN TO WATER AS WELL AS HIGHER GROWTH AS WELL AS AN INCREASING NUMBER OF PEOPLE I THINK ABOUT WATER SYSTEM, AND ALSO I AM SPEAKING ABOUT DEFINITELY ENOUGH WATER. WE'' RE STRAINED ON OUR EQUIPMENT NOW AND ALSO WITH LOCATIONS LIKE SHRIVER PARK, HOW THEY GOING TO OBTAIN WATER FOR THAT. ANYWAY, I SAY IT'' S GOING TO BE FAST AND ALSO IT IS. , if YOU PASS ALONG TO THE WATER PEOPLE STORMWATER AND WATER SUPPLY IS A BIG ISSUE AND HAS BEEN WITH ME FOR YEARS.. THANK YOU. >> > > MANY THANKS. THIS IS IT FOR THE MEETING.TWO FAST FINAL THINGS. NUMBER ONE, I UH INTENDED TO LET YOU KNOW THAT BETWEEN NOW AS WELL AS TUESDAY, THIS IS THE NEW YEAR AS WELL AS IT ' S BEEN A LONG TIME'BECAUSE WE ' VE DONE THIS, WE'ARE GOING TO WORK TO REWORK OUR SEATS JOB, SO THE SEATS ASIEMENT IS THE CHAIR THAT HAS ABILITY ANY TIME TO CHANGE THE SEATS ASIEMENT. WE HAVEN'' T DONE IT IN YEARS. BASICALLY, EACH OF YOU HAVE BE AVAILABLE IN YOU'' VE JUST FILLED IN THE INDIVIDUAL WHOM YOU REPLACED IN THE SEAT THEY HAD. WE'' RE GOING TO WORK TO REWORK THE SEATING AND SO WHEN YOU COME BELOW ON TUESDAY, WE'' LL OBTAIN THIS TO YOU BEFOREHAND, DON'' T SIMPLY COME AND ALSO SIT IN YOUR REGULAR SEAT, SIMPLY TAKE A MINUTE AND WE'' LL DETERMINE THE NEW SEATING PLAN FOR THE NEW YEAR.THE SECONDLY AS WELL AS
FINAL POINT, ANYTHING ELSE FROM STAFF FOR THIS EVENING? >> > > NO THANKS. I WAS GOING TO SAY UNLESS YOU WISH TO SIT IN SOMEBODY ELSE'' S SEAT AND ALSO BE THEM FOR TONIGHT, YOU MAY DO THAT. WE DON'' T RECOMMEND IT >>. > > IF YOU HAVE A SEATING PUBLIC RELATIONS CHOICE, THE BARTERING– WITH THAT WE'' RE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU AS WELL AS WE'' LL SEE YOU UH ON TUESDAY. BLTHSDZ.
I ' VE BEEN IN DURHAM MY WHOLE LIFE, WHAT ARE THEY DOING FOR US.WE ' VE SUR PROOI VOOIFED HOUSING AND– MADE IT THROUGH HOUSE AND FINANCIAL SITUATION. WE'' RE TIRED ON OUR SOLUTION NOW AS WELL AS WITH PLACES LIKE SHRIVER PARK, HOW THEY GOING TO OBTAIN WATER FOR THAT. AT ANY PRICE, I STATE IT'' S GOING TO BE QUICK AS WELL AS IT IS. WE HAVEN'' T DONE IT IN YEARS. > > IF YOU HAVE A SEATS PR PREFERENCE, THE BARTERING– WITH THAT WE'' RE ADJOURNED.