> > IT ' S LOT 2 RIGHT RIGHT HERE, THE ADU IS RIGHT LEER AND THE GARAGE WILL CERTAINLY GO ABOVE IT. > > YES, SINCE NO FRAMEWORK IS ALLOWED AND PART OF THIS CONSISTED OF– ON LOTS 3 AND 4, THEY EVEN HAVE LANDINGS THAT TRESPASSED INTO THAT TROUBLE AND WE HAD THE CANDIDATE REMOVE THOSE TOUCHDOWNS, THEY GOT RID OF THE DOOR AS WELL BECAUSE I THINK BUILDING CODE WOULD REQUIRE THE LANDINGS BUT THEY WERE SECOND DOORS FROM THE GARAGE TO THE BACKYARD AND THEY WERE ABLE ELIMINATE THOSE FROM THE LAYOUT THAT– WHERE THERE WAS ONLY ONE TOUCHDOWN ON EACH DEVICE OUTSIDE OF THAT 30 FOOT CREEK SETBACK, BUT THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN ITSELF IS ALLOWED WITHIN THIS. > > I ALSO VISITOR THE WEBSITE AND HAVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING FURTHER TO DISCLOSE.
> > WITH THAT, WE ' LL STEP ON TO THE AUTHORIZATION OF OUR JUNE 13 MINS, ANY COMMENTS OR CORRECTIONS ON THOSE MINS? ER >> > > THANK YOU, CHAIR CISCO. > > YES, DUE TO THE FACT THAT NO FRAMEWORK IS ALLOWED AND COMPONENT OF THIS CONSISTED OF– ON LOTS 3 AND 4, THEY EVEN HAVE LANDINGS THAT ENCROACHED RIGHT INTO THAT SETBACK AND WE HAD THE CANDIDATE REMOVE THOSE TOUCHDOWNS, THEY REMOVED THE DOOR AS WELL BECAUSE I THINK BUILDING CODE WOULD CALL FOR THE LANDINGS BUT THEY WERE SECONDLY DOORS FROM THE GARAGE TO THE YARD AND THEY WERE ABLE GET RID OF THOSE FROM THE STYLE THAT– WHERE THERE WAS JUST ONE LANDING ON EACH DEVICE OUTSIDE OF THAT 30 FOOT CREEK TROUBLE, BUT THE LANDSCAPING ITSELF IS ALLOWED WITHIN THIS. > > INCLUDING EARTH DISTURBING ACTIVITIES LIKE PAVING AND TINGS and walls? > > TERRIFIC QUESTION.WHERE THEY GET DOWN TO THOSE TWO FEET, THOSE ARE FEATURES THAT GAIN ACCESS TO ON TO COMMON AREAS, IT'' S NOT LIKE IT ' S ON A STREET FRONTAGE. I'' M HAPPY YOU ' VE ALL BEEN OUT THERE AND HAD A POSSIBILITY TO LOOK AT THE WEBSITE, BUT AS YOU RECOGNIZE, IT ' S TRULY AN INFILL JOB, IT ' S SURROUNDED BY EXISTING RESIDENCES, IT HAS A GREAT DEAL OF AMENITIES AND SOLUTIONS, SCHOOLS IN THE AREA. THAT'' S SIMPLY A RECAP OF WHAT I THINK WE ' VE PRETTY MUCH COVERED.
WHERE THEY GET DOWN TO THOSE 2 FEET, THOSE ARE CHARACTERISTICS THAT ACCESSIBILITY ON TO COMMON AREAS, IT'' S NOT LIKE IT ' S ON A ROAD FRONTAGE. TO SUMMARIZE, PARKING WHICH WE'' VE ALREADY DISCUSSED, THE STATE INFORMS United States WHAT WE ARE PERMITTED TO ASK FOR WITH THE THICKNESS BENEFIT, THAT'' S ALLOWED BY RIGHT AND WE– THAT'' S NOT A FACTOR OF NEGOTIATION. I'' M HAPPY YOU ' VE ALL BEEN OUT THERE AND HAD A POSSIBILITY TO LOOK AT THE SITE, BUT AS YOU UNDERSTAND, IT ' S TRULY AN INFILL PROJECT, IT ' S SURROUNDED BY EXISTING RESIDENCES, IT HAS A LOT OF SERVICES AND SOLUTIONS, SCHOOLS IN THE AREA. WE HAVE SIX HOUSE ON THE EXTERIOR, SO THE FOUR TO THE RIGHT OF NA STRATEGY AND THEN 2 FOLLOWING AROUND ON TO ACACIA, THOSE ARE MORE WE CALL THEM TYPICAL HOUSE, THEY'' RE TWO TALE WITH ATTACHED TANDEM GARAGES MAKING USE OF THE STREET FRONTAGE. THAT'' S SIMPLY A RECAP OF WHAT I ASSUME WE ' VE PRETTY MUCH COVERED.IF A QUESTION STANDS OUT UP FOR YOU, PLEASE LISTEN BECAUSE YOU MAY GET IT ANSWERED AS YOU PAY ATTENTION TO OUR CONVERSATION, IF YOU DON ' T OBTAIN THAT CONCERN RESPONDED TO, YU EEL BE ABLE TO SPEAK WITH THE CANDIDATE OR STAFF BEFORE THE PRODUCT HAS ENDED, PLEASE DON ' T INTERRUPT OUR PROCESS, WE WANT TO BE RESPECTFUL BOTH WAYSSINGER, WAE WANT TO LISTEN TO WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY AND YOU HAVE TO LISTEN TO WHAT WE HAVE TO SAY.WITH THAT, I ' M GOING TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IF ANY PERSON WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, GO AHEAD AND RELOCATION TO A MICROPHONE. I ASSUME NA ' S REGARDING ALL WE HAD, I DESIRED TO VALUE ONCE AGAIN THE DESIGNERS FOR CHANGING THAT BACK LINE TO ALL STRATEGY 1 RESIDENCE WHEN– I BELIEVE WE ' LL BE FINE WITH THAT AFTER IT GETS IN THERE BUT THESE OTHER CONSIDERATIONS ARE THINGS WE COULD OFFER WITH RIGHT NOW THAT MIGHT– WOULD HELP US A GREAT DEAL AND I WEAR ' T THINK WOULD TROUBLE THE ADVANCEMENT OR THE DESIGNERS TOO MUCH.THANK YOU REALLY MUCH. WE HAVE APPROXIMATELY 130 HOUSE IN THAT Z OUR COMMUNITIES THAT ONLY HAVE TWO GAIN ACCESS TO FACTORS, HAVING THIS THIRD GAIN ACCESS TO POINT WILL CERTAINLY ALLEVIATE SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT WE HAVE ESPECIALLY DURING TRAVELER HOURESS GOING IN AND OUT OF OUR SUBDIVISION.MANY TIMES WHEN I ' M DRIVING HOME AT EVENING FROM 4-6 IN THE NIGHT, I ' M WORRIED ABOUT GETTING HIT FROM HIGH RAY 12 WHEN I ' M TURNED IN TO MIDDLE RINCON, THERE ' S TOO LOTS AUTOS TURNING IN.
O.K., SO WE ' RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND RELOCATE ON'TO OUR PUBLIC HEAR K. I PUT ON ' T HAVE ANY CARDS ON THIS BUT I ' M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND EXPLAIN HOW THIS FUNCTIONS FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT SANCTUARY ' T BEEN RIGHT HERE PRIOR TO. IF An INQUIRY POPS UP FOR YOU, PLEASE LISTEN BECAUSE YOU MAY GET IT ADDRESSED AS YOU LISTEN TO OUR DISCUSSION, IF YOU PUT ON ' T OBTAIN THAT INQUIRY RESPONDED TO, YU EEL BE ABLE TO SPEAK WITH THE APPLICANT OR STAFF BEFORE THE PRODUCT HAS ACTUALLY ENDED, PLEASE DON ' T INTERRUPT OUR PROCESS, WE WANT TO BE RESPECTFUL BOTH WAYSSINGER, WAE NEED TO HEAR WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY AND YOU HAVE TO HEAR WHAT WE HAVE TO SAY.WITH THAT, I ' M GOING TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, GO AHEAD AND RELOCATION TO A MICROPHONE. I BELIEVE NA ' S REGARDING ALL WE HAD, I WANT TO APPRECIATE WHEN ONCE MORE THE DESIGNERS FOR TRANSFORMING THAT BACK LINE TO ALL STRATEGY 1 HOMES WHEN– I ASSUME WE ' LL BE FINE WITH THAT AFTER IT OBTAINS IN THERE BUT THESE OTHER CONSIDERATIONS ARE THINGS WE COULD DEAL WITH RIGHT NOW THAT MAY– WOULD HELP US A WHOLE LOT AND I WEAR ' T THINK WOULD INCONVENIENCE THE ADVANCEMENT OR THE DESIGNERS TOO MUCH.THANK YOU EXTREMELY MUCH. WE HAVE APPROXIMATELY 130 RESIDENCE IN THAT Z OUR SUBDIVISIONS THAT JUST HAVE TWO ACCESSIBILITIES POINTS, HAVING THIS THIRD GAIN ACCESS TO POINT WILL EASE SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT WE HAVE ESPECIALLY DURING COMMUTER HOURESS GOING IN AND OUT OF OUR SUBDIVISION.MANY TIMES WHEN I ' M DRIVING HOME AT EVENING FROM 4-6 IN THE NIGHT, I ' M CONCERNED ABOUT OBTAINING HIT FROM HIGH RAY 12 WHEN I ' M TURNED IN TO MIDDLE RINCON, THERE ' S TOO MANY VEHICLES TURNING IN. I ' M NOT SEEING ANYONE RELOCATE SO I ' M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.SPRINKLE HERE SOON, BUT THERE ARE WORRIES AND I UNDERSTAND IT'' S PROBLEM FOR ME IN LOOKING HOW WINDING CREEK WILL CERTAINLY EVENTUALLY SIGN UP WITH ACACIA LANE. THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE GOING TO BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINE? I MEAN, THERE'' S TYPE OF An AREA WHERE IT ZIGZAGS OUT, HOW IS THAT GOING TO BE TAKEN CARE OF AND IT LOOKS LIKE THE DAC INDICATED THERE WILL BE FIFTY PERCENT IMPROVEMENTS O WINDING CREEK AND TYPE OF A PVEMENT AND A CREEK ON THE VARIOUS OTHER SIDE SO IT'' S PERHAPS DRIVABLE BUT POSSIBLY YOU CANISTER DESCRIBE WHAT ' S GOING T HAPPEN ON WINDING CREEK? >> > ON THE TASK SIDE OF THE ROAD, SINCE THERE ISN'' T THE CAPABILITIES OF HAVING A VEHICLE PARKING LANE THERE BECAUSE THE SPACING TOF DRIVEWAY RESTRICTS ANY CAR PARKING IN BETWEEN THEM, THE PARKING LANE IS NOT THERE AND THE TRAVELING LNE IS THEN EXPANDED TO 12 FEET, AND AFTERWARDS ON THE VARIOUS OTHER SIDE OF THE ROAD, IT'' S LIKEWISE 12 FEET AND AFTERWARDS THAT HAS SIMPLY A CRITERION AC BERM, BUTS THEREUNTO REALLY ANY MEANS TO GET VEHICLE PARKING THERE ANYHOW, SO HAVING THAT OPEN AND NOT BE ABLE TO HAVE CAR PARKING ON IT IS NOT– WOULD MAKE IT UNNECESSARILY WIDE AND A RALLY WIDE STREET MAKES IT LOOK EVEN MORE LIKE AN OPENING FOR FAST DRIVING.
>> > > BUT THE VARIOUS OTHER FIFTY PERCENT SIDE OF WINDING CREEK WILL BE SMOOTH WITH AN ASPHALT BERM, IT'' S NOT JUST GOING TO BE RAVELER THE METHOD ACACIA LANE IS RIGHT NOW? IT WILL BE DRIVABLE? >> > > NO >>. > > THE TRAVELING LANE IS GOING TO COINCIDE ON BOTH SIDES TOFZ ROAD BUT IT'' S KAULD OUT ON FIFTY PERCENT SIZE IMPRAO * UFPTS ON EACH SIDE SINCE STHE ARE VARIOUS ALONG THE CURB LINE, BUT THE PAVEMENT WILL CERTAINLY BE THE EXACT SAME ALONG BOTH SIDES. >> > > OKAY >>. > > AND AS A RESULT OF THAT NARROWNESS, I REALIZE MR. SPRINKLE IS GOING THE TALK TO THIS, WOULD THE BULB-OUT BE A TROUBLE GIN THAT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE? >> > > IT WOULD LOWER AUTO PARKING TOWARDS THE JUNCTION WITH BREEDAN, TAT MAY BE AN TROUBLE TO HOMEOWNER THERE THAT WOULD OTHERWISE INTEND TO PARK THERE, O * UT OF THAT, I WEAR'' T ENVISION IT WOULD PROTRUDE FURTHER THAN THE PARKING LANE ITSELF SO IT WOULD PROBABLY NECK TO THE WIDTH OF WINDING CREEK ALONG THE SOUTHERLY PART WHICH IS 24 FEET.
>> > > OKAY. AND AFTERWARDS USUALLY FOR MR. [INAUDIBLE] PROBLEM, I COMPREHEND THAT THE ONE TASK THAT'' S CURRENTLY BEING BUILT ON ACACIA, THEY'' RE DOING THEIR HALF STREET IMPROVEMENTS, THE HALF STREET IN FRONT OF THIS TASK WILL REMAIN AS GRAVEL UNTIL IT'' S BUILT AND THEY DO THEIR IMPROVEMENTS, BUT IS THERE ANY OTHER PREPARES, CIP INTENDS OR ANYTHING FOR VARIOUS OTHER RENOVATIONS TO ACACIA LANE OR ARE WE GOING TO WAIT ON DEVELOPMENT? >> > > ESSENTIALLY AS IT HAS BEEN OCCURRING ALONG THIS STREET, IT IS LIKELY TO HAPPEN SIMILARLY, IT WILL BE BUILT THROUGH GROWTH. NOT SEE ANY PLANS THROUGH CIP FOR ANY ENHANCEMENTS ALONG THAT CORRIDOR. >> > > OK. ALRIGHT. SO, THEN I BELIEVE MAYBE THE REMAINDER ARE FOR MR. SPRINKLE TO TALK TO, QUIT INDICATIONS, LIGHT BULB OUTS, WEBSITE TRAFFIC CALMING, STRIPING. >> > > CHAIR CISCO, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, THANK YOU, I'' M ROB SPRINKLE, WEB TRAFFIC DESIGNER, I DID INTEND TO MAKE ONE EXPLANATION, THE BULB-OUT THAT ' S BEING SUGGESTED GOES TO THE JUNCTION OF BREEDAN AND WINDING CREEK, NT AT THE WEBSITE LOCATION. > > OH, O.K.. >> I DIDN ' T GET THAT. >> > > THAT ' S– > > IT TO MAKE TAT CLEAR. > > THAT WOULDN ' T WITHIN THE PROVINCE OF >> THIS ADVANCEMENT, CORRECT? > > IT COULD BE AN >> OFF-SITE ENHANCEMENT.> EMERGENCY ROOM > > IT COULD, OK. > > IT ' S MY UNDERSTANDING. CORRECT. THE STOP REGULATES CANISTER DEFINITELY BE OPTIONAL. I DON ' T KNOW THAT THEY WOULD MEET FULL WARRANTS BUT I UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEMS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS FOR THE INSTALLMENT, AS WAS MENTIONED, THEY ARE NOISY BUZZ IT DOES STOP TRAFFIC AT THAT AREA SO IT'' S CONSIDER WE CONTAINER MAKE AND IT'' S SOMETHING WE COULD LOOK AT WITH THE JOB OR FOLLOWING THE JOB FIT'' S REQUIRED AT A LATER DAY SO IT ' S SOMETHING THAT ' S WITHIN WEB TRAFFIC DESIGN ' S PREVIEW TO INSTALL, SO WE CANISTER MOLD AND MILDEW OFF AND WAIT AND INSTALL AT A LATER DAY OR DOING IT WITH THIS PROJECT, WE'' RE OPEN UP TO EITHER. >> > > O.K. >>. > > AS FOR THE– DID YOU HAVE An INQUIRY? > >> NO, GO ON. >> > > AS MUCH AS THE BULB-OUTS ARE WORRIED, MY IDEA WITH THOSE WOULD BE SIMPLY TO BULB-OUT THE DIRECTION OF WINDING CREEK BECAUSE THAT IS ONE MORE OF THE INSTRUCTIONS OF ISSUE, AS YOU DO BULB-OUT, THE CURB RETURNS, YOU DO DIMINISH THE CAPACITY TO PARK NEAR THOSE EDGES SO IF PARKING IS A PROBLEM WHICH SEEMS LIKE T WE NEED TO SUPPLY AS MUCH AUTO PARKING AS POSSIBLE FOR TE EXISTING LOCAL, WE DON'' T WANT TO BILLION BULB-OUT THE ENTIRE SECTION.THERE WAS ALSO MENTION ABOUT CONDITIONING SOME EDGE LINE STRIPING I WE and believe ' RE TOTALLY ON BOARD KEEPING THAT, THAT ' S SOMETHING WE WOULD SUPPORT TOO'. YOU DID MENTION BOTH ON ACACIA AND I ' LL CHECK ON THAT WITH THE CIP. I DON ' T THINK WE HAVE ANY CIP PROJECTS HOWEVER WE MAY HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO SOME TEMPORARY PAIRING IF THAT IS AN PROBLEM THROUGH OUR MAINTENANCE STAFF SO I ' LL CHECK IN ON THAT. > > IT ' S EXTREMELY DEPRESSING AVAILABLE, STRESSFUL TO DRIVE. > > I'RECOGNIZE, THAT ' S ANOTHER PERSON TRAFFIC CALMING ACTION. > > YEAH'. > > SPEED LIMITATION SIGNS WERE ALSO BROUGHT >> UP, WE >> DEFINITELY CANISTER EVALUATION THAT, TAKE A LOOK AT SETTING UP ADDITIONAL RATE LIMITATION INDICATION IFS THAT ' S A WORRY. TYPICALLY W DO POST SPEED RESTRICTION AND IS HAVE LIMIT AUTHORIZES ON THE SPRI * F ENTRANCE TO AREA BUT NOT THROUGHOUT. WE CANISTER SUPPLEMENT THE EXISTING INDICATIONS IF THEY ' RE NOT THERE OR IF EXTRA ONES ARE APPROPRIATE. I BELIEVE THAT COVERS– UNLESS THERE ' S OTHER CONCERNS, I ' M SATISFIED TO RESPONSE. > > OTHER COMMISSIONERS MAY HAVE QUESTIONS BUT AGAIN, IT SOUNDS LIKE >> ALL OF THOSE COULD BE HANDLED WITHOUT United States CHANGE A CONDITION ON THE DAC OR WOULD SOMETHING NEED TO BE CHANGED ON THE DAC IF WE CHOOSE TO ACCOMPLISH SO? > > I ASSUME WE– I WEAR ' T KNOW, I ' LL LET THEM– > > THEY WROTE IT SO I PRESUME THEY BETTER ANSWER. > > I'THINK THE BULB-OUTS> COULD BE CONNECTED TO THE PROJECT BUT ANYTHING ELSE THAT COULD BE AT THE DISCERNMENT OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NOT ATTACH TODAY THE TASK, I THINK THAT WOULD BE PREFERRED. > > OKAY. TERRIFIC. COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS OF PERSONNEL? YEAH, COMMISSIONER DUGGAN? > > SO, SIMPLY TO MAKE CLEAR, ON THE BULB-OUT, MR. ROSE THA, WOULD ONLY >> BE AT WINDING CREEK AND BREEDAN, BUT AT WINDING CREEK– > > IT WAS AS MR. SPRINKLE EXPLAINED IT. > > OK, BECAUSE IT AUDIO LIKE–> I WANT TODAY ASK THE CANDIDATE, IT SOUND LIKE THEY WERE RESISTANT TO HAVING BULB-OUTS CONDITIONED BUT IT SEEMS LIKE ALONG THEIR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY FRONTAGE, I ' M NOT EXACTLY SURE OF THAT. > > WELL, I THINK TEAM WOULD RECOMMEND IF THERE ' S ANYTHING TO BE >> PROPOSED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT ' S NOT THE DRAFT, WE CERTAINLY MUST MAKE INQUIRIES WITH THE APPLICANT TO SEE WHAT THEIR IDEA GETS ON THAT. > > O * BLG, AND ALSO I HAD A CONCERN OR An INQUISITIVENESS REGARDING THE PROBLEM OF >> THE RUBBISH PICKUP AFTER 8 A.M. AND IS THIS BECAUSE THE WASTE TRUCK WOULD NOT BE THE SME VEHICLE MAKING THE ROUNDS IN THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT ' S SELECTING UP A DUMPSTER? > > YEAH, TYPICALLY IT IS A DIFFERENT TRUCK THAT GRABS DUMPSTERS >> RATHER THAN THE RESIDENTIAL GARBAGE BINS. > > I UNDERSTAND THAT LOT OF THE RESIDENTIAL GARBAGE CAN, THEY COME VIA THE– > > THEY DO I MINE ALSO, BUT THE FACTOR FOR THAT IS WHEN THEY OPEN UP THE STORAGE> LOCATION AND THEY HAVE TO WHEEL THEM OUT SOMETIMES, NE EAR UNABLE TO PULL IN AND GIVEN THE LIMITED LOCATION THERE, THAT WOULD SIMPLY MAKE EVEN MORE NOISE. > > OK. THANKS. THAT ' S ALL I HAVE TODAY. > > O.K., ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF >> PERSONNEL? COMMISSIONER CARTER? > > YEAH, MY QUESTIONS RELATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROAD NETWORK AS A WHOLE IN >> TE NEIGHBORHOOD. I DISCOVERED INDICATORS ON POSSIBILITY, ONE TO THE NORTH OF PROSPECT BY THE CREEK AT CABERA OR SOMETHING, ANYWAY, WINDING CREEK ALL HAD INDICATORS SUGGESTING FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS OF THOSE ROADS BUT I ' M LISTEN TO DESPISING THERE ' S NOTHING ANYTHING IN THE CIP FOR THOSE EXPANSIONS OR THE TOTAL RENOVATION OF ACACIA, IS THAT CORRECT TO MY UNDERSTANDING? > > I THINK THE FACTOR FOR THE SIGNS AND YOU COULD CORRECT ME IF I ' M MISINTERPRETING MY QUESTION, FUTURE TRAFFIC WILL CERTAINLY GET ON THE STREETS DUE TO THE EXTENSION– THIS IS EXACTLY THE REASON THAT THOSE INDICATIONS ARE PLACED IS TO ALERT THE CITIZENS AS THEY ARE CHECKING OUT BUYING HOME INS THE AREA THAT THE STREET WILL AT SOME POINT ACCORDING TO THE BASIC STRATEGY BE LINKED TO ANOTHER PERSON STREET AND WILL CERTAINLY NOT BE A STUMBLING BLOCK. > > SO, THERE ARE VARIOUS OTHER ROADS IN YOUR AREA THAT WILL– > > PROSPECT TO THE NORTH WILL LIKEWISE LINK OVER TO PRO PEKT ON>> THE WEST WILL ATTACH TO POSSIBILITY TO THE EAST THAT ' S TO THE NORTH OF THIS AREA. > > THANKS. > > COMMISSIONER OKREPKIE? > > YES, THE CANDIDATE INDICATED THAT'HE HAD MADE INQUIRIES REGARDING NOT SPENDING WINDING CREEK WHICH THE CITY AND FIRE WERE NOT RESPONSIVE >> TO THAT, IS THAT CORRECT? > > YES TLA, ' S CORRECT, THAT ' S COMPONENT OFZ A FLOW PLAN THAT ' S BEEN AUTHORIZED. > > IS THERE ANY TYPE OF >> GROWTH ON TIS SPECIFIC PARCEL THAT IT WOULD BE AMENABLE NOT TO PROLONG WINDING CREEK? > > I WEAR ' T THINK SO, THE SITE IS TARGETED FOR RESIDENTIAL UTILIZES AND I BELIEVE ANY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT PROPOSED AT IT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PERFORM THAT ROAD RENOVATION. > > OK, THANK YOU. > > ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF PERSONNEL RIGHT NOW? YES, COMMISSIONER DUGGAN? FRJT I HAVE ANOTHER REGARDING ACACIA LANE, THE UNPAVED SECTION. >> IF THIS JOB GOES >> FORWARD AND THEY DO THEIR FIFTY PERCENT ROAD IMPROVEMENT ON ACACIA AND THE ONE CHANCES u CURRENTLY AROUND UNDER CONSTRUCTION DOES THEIR HALF STREET IMPRAO * UFRMENT, DO WE UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH OF ACACIA WOULD REMAIN UNPAVE AND HAD WOULD THAT BE COVERED BY A CIP PROJECT? FRJTS I ASSUME JESUS ADDRESSED THAT, THE ROAD WILL BE COMPLETED VIA ADVANCEMENT PROJECTS AND ROB HAS RECOMMENDED THAT PERHAPS WHERE IT ' S NOT TOTAL VIA THE CONSTRUCTION OF ACACIA TOWN THAT PROBABLY– AND WE DON ' T KNOW THAT, BUT PERHAPS WE ' LL EXPLORE DOING A TEMPORARY PAVING IN WHICH IT'' S NOT THE SAME AS THE ROAD AND IT ' S– > > LIKE PROSPECT AND AFTER THAT WHATEVER IS ON THE OTHER– > > SO, JESUS'IS INFORMING ME THAT PORTIONS OF ACACIA LANE MAY BE PRIVATE IN WHICH WE DON ' T HAVE JURISDICTIONS PRIOR TO WE >> DO PAVING, THAT ' S WHY I PUT ON ' T KNOW EACTLY IF WE CANISTER DO IT, WE HAVE T MAKE THOSE INFORMATION PRIOR TO WE DIVE OUT AND BEGIN PAVING'. > > IF I MAY CHIME IN ON THAT, THESE ITEMS GIVEN THAT WHAT YU ' RE HEAR, WE COULD IMPLEMENT THEM AND EVALUATE THEM BY THEMSELVES IF THEY ' RE FEASIBLE AND IF
>> THEY ' RE NEEDED, PERSONNEL WOULD RECOMMEND TLA ' S THE APPROACH THAT ' S TAKEN AS OPPOSED TO ATTACH THESE TO THE PROJECT, PARTICULARLY IF THEY'' RE OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS BECAUSE THIS NEEDS TO BE A CLEAR NEXUS AND WE HAVE ACTUALLY NOT DONE THAT EXAMINATION SO I THINK STAFF SUGGESTION FOR EVERY ONE OF THESE ITEMS WE ' RE DISCUSSING, THEY BE LEFT TO THE ANALYSIS AND TO THE DISCERNMENT OF THE CITY WEB TRAFFIC DESIGN DEPARTMENT. > > O.K.. THAT INCLUDES THE BULB-OUTS? OF COURSE, WONDERFUL, OKAY THA, ' S WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW. ANY QUESTIONS OF THE CANDIDATE? YEAH, MR. OKREPKIE? > > YEAH, REGARDING WEBSITE TRAFFIC, IS YOUR WEB TRAFFIC DESIGNER HERE? > > NO, WE DO NOT HAVE A WEBSITE TRAFFIC DESIGNER BELOW, THE PROJECT ENGINEER, CIVIL ENGINEER IS BELOW. > > OKAY, MY >> QUESTION EXISTS ' S A WEB 226 TRIPS ON RIGHT HERE AND WITH AM OF AN ADDITIONAL 24 NET AND PM OF ADDITIONAL NET FOR A TOTAL OF 42 YET THERE ' S 185 MISSING OUT ON THERE, AND IT >> WAS REGARDED TO BE LESS THAN SUBSTANTIAL INFLUENCE, EVEN IF YOU ' RE UTILIZING 10 JOURNEYS OR 10 HOURS IN BETWEEN THOSE HEIGHT HOURS, THAT ' S 18.5 JOURNEYS, SO YOU ' RE EXPRESSION YOUR PEAK HOUR ARES THE SAME AS YOUR REGULAR HOURS, I ' M JUST WONDERING HOW'THAT DECISION WAS MADE. > > I ' M AFRAID I CAN ' T TELL YOU. I WOULD NEED THE TRAFFIC DESIGNER TO ADDRESS THAT. > > I BELIEVE I COMPREHEND YOUR QUESTION. THE'TRIP THAT IS ARE NOTED HERE ARE PRODUCE FRAMED THE I.T. TRANSPORT DESIGN MANUAL FOR A GENERATION OF SINGLE FAMILY TRIPS FOR SOLITARY FAMILY MEMBERS RESIDENCES, THE REQUIREMENT >> RATE IS– IT ' S ABOUT TEN JOURNEYS DAILY PER FAMILY SXIT ' S 9.44 TO MAKE SURE THAT DOESN ' T INCREASE ANY PROBLEMS FOR ME. THE COMPLETE BEING 227 INTERNET I HAVE ON MY SHEET, MAYBE IT ' S VARIOUS THAN YOURS. AND AFTER THAT HAVING– O.K., I THINK I SEE WHAT YOU ' RE EXPRESSION, SO THE A.M. TRIPS BEING 18, THAT ' S BASICALLY THE COLLECTIONS OF PEOPLE GOING TO WORK OR PERHAPS RETURNING FROM FUNCTION AND AFTERWARDS THE 24 IN THE P.M. OPTIMAL, AGAIN, PEOPLE RETURNING FROM FUNCTION, THROUGHOUT THE REMAINDER OF THE DAY, IT ' S NOT SIMPLY THE REST TOF MIDDLE OF THE DAY, IT ' S THE REST OF THE WHOLE DAY, ALL THE 24 HR WHICH THIS 226 OR 27 JOURNEY ARES BEING CREATED IS SPREAD OVER BASICALLY.IS THAT ANSWERING YOUR QUESTION OR NOT EXACTLY? > > A BIT, BUT I INDICATE, I GUESS IT ' S JUST WHEN I ' M LOOKING AT IT, YOU ' RE AVERAGING 10 DRIP TRIPS AN HOUR AT 3 IN THE EARLY MORNING, 4 IN THE MORNING, >> 2 IN THE MORNING 1 IN THE MORNING WHEN WH * THAT ' S MOST LIKELY NOT LIKELY AND TO ME, IT RESEMBLES UTILIZING– IT LOOKS LIKE THERE ' S A GREAT DEAL OF TRIP THAT IS ARE BEING EXPAND, NOT IN PEAK HOURS WHICH WOULD BE ONE OF THE MOST LIKELY USAGE OF THOSE SO IT DOESN ' T HIT THAT 50 JOURNEY THRESHOLD. > > WE DON ' T ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO SPREAD THE JOURNEY GENERATION, THIS IS WHAT ' S GENERATED IN THE ACTUAL HANDBOOK SO THEY DON ' T HAVE THE LATITUDE TO ACCOMPLISH THAT.
>> THE METHOD'WE– IF WE LOOK AT IT SIMPLY ON A ROUGH TIMETABLE, WE WOULD SAY THAT REALLY THE JOURNEY ARES SPREAD OVER TO 10-12'HOUR DURATION IS BASICALLY WHAT WE ' RE LOOKING AT, SO 10-12 HOUR DURATION, 24 BEING ONE OF THE MOST, ET CETERA OF THE TRIPS THROUGHOUT THE DAY BEING CONCERNING EQUAL BUT LESS WOULD ACCUMULATE'TO THE 226 TRIPS THAT I ASSUME YOU ' RE TALKING ABOUT. > > YEAH, IT DOESN ' T SEEM TO ME THAT 2 ADDED JOURNEYS WOULD EQUIVALENT TOP HOURS VERSUS ON NON-PEAK HOURS. EMERGENCY ROOM > > I SEE SPECIFICALLY WHAT YOU'' RE SAYING. >> YOU KNOWER. > > I UNDERSTAND YOU PUT ON ' T HAVE AN SOLUTION, THAT ' S JUST An ISSUE. > > WE DO CHECK THESE FIGURES TO WHAT THE >> MANUAL IS THAT THEY ARE CORRECT, WE DO DOUBLE CHECK THOSE THINGS>. > > AND IF I CAN'JUST CHIME IN, THE ANALYSIS THAT WAS DONE T CONDITIONS THAT WERE APPLY TODAY THIS PROJECT, IT ' S CONSISTENT TYPICAL CONVENTION TO HOW WE EVALUATE THE TRAFFIC >> STUDY AND HOW WE CONDITION THESE PROJECTS TO ENSURE THAT SAME APPROACH IS USED CONSISTENTLY THROUGHOUT THIS KIND OF PROJECT. > > VICE CHAIR WEEKS? > > THIS IS An INQUIRY FOR THE CANDIDATE. CAN YU TELL ME WHAT ARE THE BED ROOM SIZES IN THE LOW INCOME UNITS? > > WELL, THE DEVICES HAVEN ' T BEEN MADE YET, BUT THEY ' LL BE THE THREE
>> OR 4 BEDROOM UNITS >>, I CAN ' T REALLY COMMENT AS TO WHAT SIZES THEY ' LL BE, BUT– WELL, I TIN SAY THEY WILL CERTAINLY BE CONSISTENT, REALLY SIMILAR, NOT'NECESSARILY IDENTICAL BUT SIMILAR TO THE MARKETPLACE PRICE UNITS, SO THEY ' LL BE REASONABLY SZED. > > SO, I THINKS MY INQUIRY IS REALLY, ARE YOU INTENDING ON HAVING THEM BE JUST THE 2 BEDROOM UNITS OR THE THREE OR THE FOUR, OR YOU WEAR ' T KNOW YET? > > THEY'' LL PROBABLY BE FOUR >> BEDROOM UNITS SO THEY ' LL PROBABLY BE FAMILY SYSTEMS. > > AND WHEN DO YOU PERFORM THE AGREEMENT WITH THE REAL ESTATE AUTHORITY? > > WELL, SUSIE WOULD HAVE TO ANSWER THAT. > > THEY ' LL HAVE TO CARRY OUT THE AGREEMENT BEFORE THE'LAST MAP IS VIDEOTAPED I BELIEVE.
>> CERTAINLY PRIOR TO THE BUILDING LICENSE ISSUANCE, BUT IT ' S IN FACT– IT ' S A DEED LIMITATION ON THE FINAL MAP. > > ANYTHING ELSE FROM STAFF OR THE– COMMISSIONER CARTER? > > YEAH, I HOPE I ' M NOT GOING BACK ALSO MUCH BELOW, BUT WHEN THE HOUSING INCENTIVE FUND WAS OFFERED, IN THE STAFF >> REPORT, IT CLAIMED IT WAS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ENHANCEMENTS, WERE THERE DETERMINED FRAMEWORK IMPROVEMENTS TAT TIME? > > I ' M GOING THE DEFER TO THE CANDIDATE DUE TO THE FACT THAT THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS HANDLED WITH THE HOUSING DEPARTMENT AND PREPARATION PERSONNEL WAS NOT INVOLVED IN THAT DISCUSSION.WE JUST KIND OF PUT THE BRAKES ON THE ENTITLEMENT PROCEDURE UNTIL IT WAS FIXED. > > I ' M HAPPY TO RESPONSE THAT. YES, THE IMPROVEMENTS WERE THE OFF-SITE ENHANCEMENTS TO SO * THE FUNCTION TO ACACIA LANE AND THE EXTENSION OF WINDING CREEK, THOSE WERE THE ENHANCEMENTS. IT DESIRED WE MADE THAT PRICE QUOTE THAT THE JOB NEARBY WHICH WAS ALREADY AUTHORIZED STARTED AND THAT TRANSFORMED THE RANGE OF WHAT WE WOULD HAVE TO DO, IT REDUCED THE SCOPE OF WHAT WE HAD TO PERFORM BUT THAT WAS THE WORK THAT WAS MEANT. > > SO, THE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT THAT IS YOU ' VE INCLUDE IN YOUR JOB WERE THE ONE THAT IS WERE RECOGNIZED FOR THE MOTIVATION FUND. > > EXACTLY THE SAME ONES, YES. >> > > THANK YOU. > > OK. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? O.K.. THANK YOU. I ' LL PROCEED AND HAVE THE COMPENSATIONS RELOCATE A RESOLUTION, WE ' LL BEGINNING WITH THE CONDITIONAL USAGE PERMIT RESOLUTION FOR PURPOSES OF CONVERSATION. >> > > I ' LL STEP A RESOLUTION OF THE'INTENDING COMPENSATION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA MAKING FINDINGS AND DECISIONS AND AUTHORIZE AGO CONDITIONAL USAGE LICENSE FOR ACACIA VILLAGE A SMALL WHOLE LOT CLASS LOCATED AT 746 ACACIA LANE, FILE NUMBER PRJ18-036 AND FORGO ADDITIONAL READING. > > I ' LL SECONDLY. > > OK. THAT WAS MOVED BY COMMISSIONER DUGGAN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PETERSON, VICE CHAIR WEEKS, YOU WISHED TO START ON THIS SET? > > SURE. I AM GOING TO BE SUPPORTING THE PROJECT.I D APPRECIATE THAT YOU ' VE FUNCTION WITCHED THE NEIGHBORS AND SOME OF THEIR ISSUES, NOT ALL OF THEM, BUT I DO APPRECIATE THAT YOU HAVE ALTERED SEVERAL OF THE LAYOUT DUE TO THAT AND >> THAT YU ' RE GIVING SOME LOW INCOME RENTALS, SO
I ' LL BE SUPPORTIVE OF'THE PROJECT, I CAN MAKE ALL THE FINDINGS. > > COMMISSIONER PETERSON? > > I ALSO ASSUMES THAT THIS IS A TERRIFIC EXAMPLE OF WHAT SHOWS UP TO ME TO BE POSITIVE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE COMMUNITY AND THE PROGRAMMER WHERE WITH TYPE'OF A BACKWARD AND FORWARD THAT WAS ABLE TO GENERATE A BETTER DESIGN, BETTER INTEGRATED PLAN SO I COMPLIMENT THE NEIGHBORHOODS AND THE DESIGNER FOR THAT. I THINK IN A GENERAL FEELING, WHAT WE AO * EFZ LEARNT THROUGH THE GENERAL PUBLIC, BOTH IN THE WRITTEN COMMENT AND IS TONIGHT WAS CARS ARE THE TROUBLE AND WHETHER IT ' S SPEEDING, THE NOISE, PARKING, THE DANGERS TO CHILDREN, WE ' RE STRUGGLING WITH IN A WHOLE LOT OF THESE PROJECTS AND ESPECIALLY IN INFILL PROJECTS ARE THE ISSUES AROUND CARS AND TRUCKS, IN WHICH DO YOU KEEP THEM, WHAT ARE THEY DOING, HOW ' S IT IMPACTING THE personality and the neighborhood AND I THINK KIND OF COUNTERSBAOUR STIFFLY WHAT THE DEVELOPER HAS ACTUALLY SUGGESTED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT AMONG THE SOLUTIONS, IF WE OBTAIN DENSER REAL ESTATE, IF WE GET PEOPLE OUT OF THEIR AUTOMOBILE, IF WE GET WALKABLE COMMUNITIES, IF WE OBTAIN THAT LEVEL OF THICKNESS THAT VALIDATES HAVING SERVICES NEIGHBORING, WHETHER IT ' S A SUPERMARKET OR DRY CLEANSER, PARKS, EVERY ONE OF THESE MATTERS INDIVIDUALS WANT IN A WALKABLE COMMUNITY, I ASSUME YOU RESOLVE THE CR PROBLEM, I THINK IF PEOPLE DON ' T REQUIRED TWO AUTOMOBILES OR THEY DON ' T REQUIREMENT TO HAVE– ENTER THEIR AUTOMOBILE TO GO CHECK OUT A CLOSE FRIEND OR RUN ERRAND, I ASSUME IT WOULD REALLY ADJUSTMENT TYPE OF THE NATURE OF THESE KINDS OF CALCULATIONS THAT WE MAKE AT THE PREPARING COMMISSION LEVEL.RELATED TO THAT IN TERMS OF'THE DESIGN AND THE ADVANCEMENT, I ASSUME AS WAS MENTIONED BY THE DESIGNER, I ASSUME IT ' S EXCELLENT TO HAVE THESE MRE MODESTLY SZED HOUSES. THERE WAS AN WRITE-UP IN THE WALL STREET JOURNAL THAT SAID THESE BOOMER RETIREES CAN ' T UNLOAD THEIR 5
, 6Z, 7 THOUSAND SQUARE FOOT RESIDENCES BECAUSE NO ONE DESIRES THEM AND THEY CANISTER ' T KEEP GOING UP AND DOWN THE STAIRESS, THEY'CAN ' T MAINTAIN THE YARDS OR KEEP IT CLEAN, SO I THINK HAVING An EMPHASIS MORE EXTERNALLY SOLVES ISSUES LIKE THAT IN ADDITION TO SAFETY, PROTECTION, THE SENSE OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS AND SAFETY AND SECURITY OFZ THE KIDS PLAYING OUTSIDE AND SO I THINK'IT ' S A VERY THOUGHTFULLY MADE GROWTH AND I ASSUME WITH THE GIVING INS THE DEVELOPER HAS GIVEN TO THE COMMUNITY IN TERMSER OF THE ALIGNMENTS OF YOUR HOUSE AND IS THE LIGHTS, I THINK ACTUALLY MAKES SENSE FOR THE LOCATION AND AS A MODEL GOING AHEAD, THE SPECIFIC CONCERNS THAT HAVE BEEN IN'FRONT PEOPLE THAT HAVE SHOW UP FROM PUBLIC COMMENTS AS WELL AS QUESTION FROM THE PAYMENT, I ' M NOT EXACTLY SURE I WOULD TEND TO INCLUDE A LIGHT BULB OUT AS PART OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE PROJECT.I EM INTERESTED TO LEARN THROUGH MY OTHER COMMISSIONERS ON THAT PARTICULAR BUT THAT ' S CERTAINLY THE WAY I ' M LEANING. I WOULD BE EVEN MORE INCLINED TO THERE OF ACCEPT MR. SPRINKLE ' S TECHNIQUE WHICH IS TO HAVE THE GROWTH GO IN, OBTAIN FEEDBACK FROM THE AREAS AND THE PROGRAMMERS SEE WAT WITH FUNCTION
BEST, WHETHER IT ' S TWO METHOD STOP, 4 MEANS STOP, NO QUIT, THAT ' S TYPE OF THE SENSE'I OBTAIN IS THE IDEAL TECHNIQUE.
> > OKAY. > > THAT ' S– > > IT TO MAKE TAT CLEAR. > > I THINK WE– I PUT ON ' T KNOW, I ' LL LET THEM– > > THEY COMPOSED IT SO I THINK THEY BETTER RESPONSE. > > NO, WE DO NOT HAVE A TRAFFIC DESIGNER BELOW, THE TASK ENGINEER, CIVIL DESIGNER IS RIGHT HERE. > > I ' M AFRAID I CAN ' T TELL YOU.SO, KEEPING THAT, PENDING DISCUSSION AMONGST THE COMMISSION ON THAT CONCERN, I BELIEVE I WOULD HAVE THE ABILITY TO MAKE ALL NEEDED SEARCHINGS FOR FOR THIS TASK. >> > > AND I BELIEVE THAT WAS TEAM ' S SUGGESTION THAT WE NOT SHOT TO PROBLEM EVEN THE BULB-OUTS, THAT WE JUST ALLOW IT GO THROUGH THAT PROCEDURE, SO I CONCUR WITH THAT TOO, SO COMMISSIONER OKREPKIE? >> > > THERE ' S A WHOLE LOT TO LIKE ABOUT THIS JOB AND THIS APPLICATION, LOW REVENUE REAL ESTATE ESPECIALLY ON THE EAST SIDE, THE TREE CONSERVATION, I'' M PLEASED THE APPLICANT MADE SOME CONCESSIONS, I WILL CERTAINLY SI THAT I WAS EXTREMELY PLEASED TO HEAR THE TO AND FRO AND HOW RESPECTFUL AND BOTH WAYS IT WAS INCLUDING PUBLIC REMARK THA,'' S NOT ALWAYS THE METHOD IT GOES IN DOCUMENT OR IN THIS ROOM.I AGREE WITH MY COLLEAGUES, IT'' S A WONDERFUL EXAMPLE OF INFILL WITH THE COMMUNITY SPACES AND THE NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBORS, FORCING THEM, AND WITH THE WINDING CREEK EXTENSION BEING INESCAPABLE WITH ANY ADVANCEMENT OF ANY KIND, MY ONLY WORRY WOULD BE THE WEB TRAFFIC THAT I BROUGHT UP BUT MY QUALMS AREN'' T SO MUCH WITH THE CANDIDATE AND PERSONNEL BUT THE APPROACHES THAT ARE USED TO OBTAIN TO THOSE NUMBERS, SO EVERYTHING APART, I AM– I WILL CERTAINLY REMAIN IN SUPPORT OF THIS JOB, I'' M ALSO GOING TO LSTEN TO PERSONNEL ' S RECOMMENDATION AND NOT PROBLEM THIS IN ALL AND I TIN MAKE ALL THE REQUIRED FINDINGS. >> > > COMMISSIONER DUGGAN >>? > > I TIN ALSO MAKE ALL THE REQUIRED SEARCHINGS FOR, I BELIEVE IT'' S A WONDERFUL JOB. I SUCH AS THE COMMON AREA AND THE FRONT PORCH AND IS THE USUAL FACILITIES AND THE FAK THAT THE APPLICANT HAS FUNCTIONED SO HARD WITH THE MADE and neighbors SOME CHANGES AS A RESULT OF THE AREA INPUT, I THINK THAT'' S A TERRIFIC BEGINNING TO An EFFECTIVE JOB WHEN INTEGRATING WITH AN EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD.I LIKE THE BUDGET FRIENDLY
SYSTEMS AND IT ' S An AVAILABLE FOR SALE TASK, SO I'' M COMPLETELY ON BEHALF OF IT. >> > > COMMISSIONER KALIA? >> > > I ALSO CONCUR WITH ALL MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS. I REALLY VALUE THE TO AND FRO WITH THE AREAS AND THE PROGRAMMER AS COMMISSIONER O KEP CAOE CLAIMED, THAT'' S NOT ALWAYS THE WAY THINGS GO. I THINK THIS CHEAT SOEFPT A POCKET NEIGHBORHOOD IS REALLY INTERESTING AD I BELIEVE IT'' S A FANTASTIC USAGE FOR THIS SITE AND WITH THE SMALLER SIZED WHOLE LOTS AND SMALLER HOUSES AND HAVING REALLY CREATING AREA WITH THE AREA IS REALLY INTERESTING TO ME, AND I TIN MAKE ALL THE REQUIRED FINDINGS AND WILL BE SUPPORTING THIS PROJECT. >> > > AND COMMISSIONER CARTER? >> > > I NORMALLY AGREE WITH MY COLLEAGUES THAT THIS IS ANOTHER IMAGINATIVELY DESIGNED INFILL HOUSING TASK. I DO BELIEVE THAT AS WE STRATEGY EVEN MORE URBAN DENSITIES AND APPEARANCE INS THIS PART OF COMMUNITY, I ASSUME WE NEED TO PAY CAREFUL ATTENTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF FRAMEWORK NOT TO IMPROVE WEBSITE TRAFFIC BUT TO GIVE POSSIBILITIES FOR CONNECTION FOR ALL SETTINGS OF TRAVEL.I THINK ACACIA
LANE IS GOING TO COME TO BE AVERY IMPORTANT CONNECTION TO THIS NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE SOONER WITH CANISTER GET A FULL SOLUTION ACACIA LANE THAT SERVES ALL SETTINGS OFZ TRAVEL, THE BTTER OFF WE'' LL BE SO I MOTIVATE A TEAM TO GO AFTER A CIP PROGRAM THAT WILL GET A STREET NETWORK IN BELOW TO ASSISTANCE THIS SORT OF THICKNESS AND IMAGINATIVE INTENDING AND I BELIEVE WITH THAT SAID, I TIN MAKE ALL OF THE SEARCHINGS FOR. >> > > AND I WOULD JUST ECHO ALL THAT'' S BEEN SAID AND PARTICULARLY RECOGNIZING THE TO AND FRO WITH THE COMMUNITY AND THE APPLICANT, IT'' S ALWAYS SUCH A SATISFACTION FOR United States TO SEE MANY FAVORABLE POINTS THAT HAVE BEEN STATED THAT I WON'' T REPEAT BUT I WOULD SIMPLY REPEAT FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD THERE THAT THE CONNECTIVITY IS REALLY, REALLY IMPORTANT.EVERY TIME WE STRATEGY
ANYTHING ANYWHERE AND ROADS ARE INVOLVED, WE ' RE LOOKING AT WHERE THE NEXT JOB COULD BE AND HOW D WE– WE GT A FLOW ROUTE, TO MAKE SURE THAT WEBSITE TRAFFIC IS REDUCED, SO I VALUE THE DESIRE TO REMAIN TO HAVE YOUR FENCING THERE OR YOUR FIRE ESCAPE THERE BUT THAT JUST ACTUALLY ISN'' T HOW THE CITY IS DESIGNED TO WORK AND HOW OUR GENERAL PLAN FUNCTIONS. SO,– AND I DEFINITELY WOULD BALLOT FOR ANYTHING THAT COULD BE DONE TO BOOST ACACIA LANE WHEREVER IT COULD B ENHANCED SINCE I KNOW I WAS FEARING GOING OUT TO CHECK OUT THE WEBSITE BECAUSE I'' VE BEEN ON THAT PARTICULAR ROAD PRIOR TO AND IT REQUIRES A GREAT DEAL OF AID. SO, THIS TASK WILL DEFINITELY OBTAIN THE FRONT SECTION OF IT TO RISE TO WHERE YOU GIES ARE, BUT CHILD, IT'' S NOT PLEASURABLE. WITH THAT, THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WAS MOVED BY COMMISSIONER DUGGAN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER PETERSON, AND YOUR BALLOTS, PLEASE. WHICH PASSES WITH 7 AYES, AND AFTERWARDS WE HAVE ANOTHER PERSON RESOLUTION, I BELIEVE, THE TENTATIVE MAP.ER >
> I'' LL RELOCATION THE RESOLUTION THAT THE INTENDING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA APROVER POINT ACACIA VILLAGE TENTATIVE MAP, FILE NMBER PRJ18-036 AND FORGO FURTHER ANALYSIS. >> >'> I ' LL >> SECONDLY. > > OK, SO THAT RESOLUTION WAS RELOCATED BY COMMISSIONER DUGGAN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER PETERSON. ANY OTHER CONVERSATION OR REMARKS? GREAT, YOUR VOTES, PLEASE. WHICH PASSES WITH 7 AYES. AND I THINK THAT CONCLUDES OUR BUSINESS THIS EVENING.I HAVE WORD
THAT OUR JULY 11TH MEET ISING BEING CANCELLED SO I'' LL GO AHEAD AND ADJOURN THIS CONFERENCE TO OUR SECOND MEETING IN JULY. (METING IS ADJOURNED ).
> > I TIN ADDITIONALLY MAKE ALL THE REQUIRED FINDINGS, I THINK IT'' S A WONDERFUL TASK. I TRULY APPRECIATE THE BACK AND FORTH WITH THE COMMUNITY AND THE DESIGNER AS COMMISSIONER O KEP CAOE CLAIMED, THAT'' S NOT ALWAYS THE MEANS THINGS GO. > > AND I WOULD JUST MIRROR ALL THAT'' S BEEN CLAIMED AND IN SPECIFIC RECOGNIZING THE BACK AND FORTH WITH THE applicant and the area, IT'' S ALWAYS SUCH An ENJOYMENT FOR US TO SEE SO MANY FAVORABLE THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN STATED THAT I WON'' T REPEAT BUT I WOULD SIMPLY REPEAT FOR THE ADVANTAGES OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD THERE THAT THE CONNECTION IS REALLY, REALLY IMPORTANT.EVERY TIME WE PLAN
ANYTHING ANYWHERE AND STREETS ARE ENTAILED, WE ' RE LOOKING AT IN WHICH THE NEXT TASK MAY BE AND HOW D WE– WE GT A BLOOD CIRCULATION PATH, SO THAT WEB TRAFFIC IS REDUCED, SO I VALUE THE DESIRE TO CONTINUE TO HAVE YOUR FENCING THERE OR YOUR EMERGENCY SITUATION EXIT THERE BUT THAT SIMPLY ACTUALLY ISN'' T HOW THE CITY IS DESIGNED TO WORK AND HOW OUR GENERAL PLAN WORKS. AND I BELIEVE THAT WRAPS UP OUR BUSINESS THIS EVENING.I HAVE WORD
THAT OUR JULY 11TH MEET ISING BEING CANCELLED SO I'' LL GO AHEAD AND ADJOURN THIS CONFERENCE TO OUR SECONDLY CONFERENCE IN JULY.