>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PLEASE STAND >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> BY … > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > CITY OF SANTA ROSA > > PLEASE STAND >> >> BY …

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > CITY OF SANTA ROSA > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> CITY >> >> >> >> >> >> >> COUNCIL > > > > PLEASE STAND BY … > > >> > > > > > > >

>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PLEASE STAND BY … > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VICE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CITY OF SANTA ROSA CITY COUNCIL > > PLEASE STAND BY … > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: GREAT AFTERNOON, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, I WILL CERTAINLY PHONE CALL THE MEETING OF THE SANTA ROSA CITY COUNCIL TO ORDER. > > CONTAINER YOU REPEAT WHAT YOU SIMPLY SAID SO WE ARE CLEAR ON IT. > > SO, THERE WAS SEVERE DAMAGES AND ALSO THEN SUBSTANTIAL IMPACT.

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PLEASE STAND >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> BY … > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > CITY OF SANTA ROSA > > PLEASE STAND >> >> BY …

>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > CITY OF SANTA ROSA > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> CITY >> >> >> >> >> >> >> COUNCIL > > > > PLEASE STAND BY … > > >> > > > > > > >

>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PLEASE STAND BY … > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VICE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CITY OF SANTA ROSA CITY COUNCIL > > PLEASE STAND BY … > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: GREAT MID-DAY, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, I WILL TELEPHONE CALL THE FULFILLING OF THE SANTA ROSA CITY COUNCIL TO ORDER. > > GREAT AFTERNOON. > > YES, LET ME ASK YOU TO PLEASE SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE. > > SO, THERE WAS SEVERE DAMAGE AS WELL AS THEN SIGNIFICANT INFLUENCE. > > AND ALSO HERE YOU TIN SEE THIS IS STILL USING THE HUD METHOD WHERE WE APPLIED THE RANGE OF 1-5 AND ALSO APPLIED THE AVERAGE DAMAGE AMOUNT.YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE CURRENT ALLOCATION AS IT STANDS IN THE ASSIGNMENTS, AS WELL AS AFTER THAT THERE IS GOING TO BE A DEMAND, I SUSPECT, FOR United States TO ASK THE STATE TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL RESOURCES BASED ON WHAT WE SEE AS WELL AS IT MAY NOT BE THE ONLY TIME THAT WE DEMAND ADDITIONAL RESOURCE AS WE LEARN EVEN MORE CONCERNING THE IMPACTED OF THE DISASTER FROM LAST OCTOBER.

SO, I REALLY HOPE THAT PROVIDES A LITTLE CLEARNESS. THERE IS AN ASSIGNMENT OF DOLLARS, THOSE DOLLARS THAT THE STATE HAS ACTUALLY PROPOSED A PLAN. YOU ARE GOING TO COMMENT ON THAT PLAN, BUT THOSE DOLLAR JOBS DOES NOT MEET THE OVERALL UNMET REQUIREMENT. THAT'' S WHY WE BROUGHT HAGGERTY HERE. IF YOU ARE GOING TO DEMAND ADDITIONAL ACTION, WE NEED TO RESOLVE THE STATE. THE ELECTED OFFICIALS MADE THAT DEMAND TO ME THAT THE REQUEST NEED TO INVOLVE ME FROM THE STATE TO THE FEDS IN ORDER FOR THAT TO PROGRESS. I SUSPICIOUS THERE WILL BE AN OPPORTUNITY WITH UNFORTUNATE OTHER FIRES THAT HAVE OCCURRED IN 2018 TO MAKE A REQUEST AND AN EXTRA DEMAND. >> > > I THINK NOW WOULD BE A GOOD TIME TO MAKE CLEAR TO THE COUNCIL AND ALSO CLEAR TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC HOW WE ARE DOING THIS TONIGHT.

THERE IS TWO COMPONENTS BELOW THAT HAGGERTY IS TALKING ABOUT THEIR UNMET NEEDS ASSESSMENT. LATER WE'' LL BE DISCUSSING THE STATE ' S ACTION STRATEGY. POSSIBLY WE CONTAINER TALK A LITTLE NOW ABOUT HOW THESE TWO GO TOGETHER OR DON'' T FIT. > >> SO, I ASSUME THAT THIS IS OUR SPACE THAT WE HAVE OCCUPIED AS A CITY LOTS TIMES IN THIS PROCEDURE WHICH IS WE REALLY APPRECIATE THE AID AND ALSO ASSISTANCE THAT WE GOT FROM THE STATE AS WELL AS THE FEDERAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, BUT WE INTEND TO AS STAFF CONFIRM EVERY LITTLE THING, AND THIS IS THE VERIFICATION PROCESS. YOU ARE GETTING THE SPECIALISTS TEAM PRESENTATION AT THIS TIME WHICH IS ABOUT WHAT THEY HAVE DISCOVERED AS THE UNMET NEED THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS FACING. THAT UNMET REQUIREMENT AS YOU ARE HEARING DES NOT MATCH WHAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WAS UTILIZING TO MAKE DECISIONS CONCERNING DESIGNATING RESOURCES TO THE STATE OF THE GOLDEN STATE, AND THEREFORE TO THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA.

SO THIS IS OUR DISCUSSION ON WHAT THE UNMET REQUIREMENT FR THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA IS. OKAY, TO MAKE SURE THAT IS WHAT THIS STUDY SESSION IS ABOUT, AND THEN LATER TODAY, WE WILL HAVE AN RECORD ACTION THAT REVIEWS THOSE ACTION DOLLARS THAT WERE ASSIGNED. THIS IS THE NEEDS EVALUATION TO DAY, THERE WILL STILL BE VOID AS YOU ARE HEARING BECAUSE DATA BASE, BUT THE BIG MESSAGE HERE IS THAT THE EVALUATION DONE BY HAGGERTY HAS ACTUALLY SHOWN THAT THE FEDERAL PROGRAM DID NOT MEET THE UNMET NEEDS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. >> > > I THINK THE NUMBERS POSSIBLY VARIOUS, THE STYLE OF BOTH OF THESE IS GOING TO BE SIMILAR.

THE STATE IN THEIR REPORT THEY TALK ABOUT FEMA AND ALSO HUD'' S ANALYSIS OF UNMET REQUIRES STATEWIDE. I ASSUME IT'' S $922 MILLION, BUT BY THE STATE'' S ALTERNATE METHOD OF LOOKING AT IT, THEY THINK OF $2.5 BILLION OF UNMET REQUIRES. SO TWO 1/2 TIMES OF WHAT THE STATE IS DISCUSSING. I PUT ON'' T KNOW IF THE ELEMENTS COINCIDE FOR OURS AND ALSO TE STATES, BUT OBVIOUSLY,'WHAT ' S BEING OFFERED, WHAT'' S BEEN ALLOCATED FOR THIS DISASTER FALLS MUCH EXCEPT WHAT THE REQUIREMENT ARE. WE ARE GOING TO BARGAIN WITH THAT AND AFTERWARDS MAINTAIN PUSHING FOR EVEN MORE. >> > > THANKS, MAYOR. I JUST INTENDED TO COMPLY WITH U THAT I AM STRONGLY ENSURING THAT THE LOSS OF REVENUE NEED TO BE CONSISTED OF IN THE UNMET NEED. CLEANSERS, LANDSCAPERS, ETC. IT APPEARS LIKE IT MIGHT BE A TEAM THAT MAY OBTAIN> MISSED OUT ON. > > AFTER THAT I ' M GOING TO HAND IT BACK TO MATT HOCKSTEIN TO COVER THE FACILITIES. >> > > I WILL COVER THE FRAMEWORK. THIS IS THE THIRD LEG OF HUD'' S TECHNIQUE FOR LOOKING AT UNMET NEED.JUST SO YOU

RECOGNIZE AS WELL AS WE ARE GETTING A LOT OF CONCERNS AND SIMPLY TO REITERATE IN STIPULATIONS OF WHAT WE ARE LOOKING TO DO HERE IS WE ARE LOKING AT UNMET REQUIRES IN THE EYES OF HUD. THESE ARE THINGS THAT YOU TIN USAGE THE HUD MONEY TO ALLOCATE ON BECAUSE WE ARE DISCUSSING SOME GRAY AREAS AS WELL AS WHILE THERE IS, THERE IS ALWAYS GOING TO BE AN ADDED UNMET DEMAND BUT WE CANISTER TALK ABOUT HOW THIS PROGRAM I WHERE and developed THIS MONEY CAN BE USED FOR CDBG DOLLARS.THIS IS ANOTHER PERSON ONE

OF THESE CATEGORIES. WE HAVE 4 CONTAINERS HERE OF UNMET DEMAND THAT WE HAVE CALCULATED. THE FIRST IS THE REGIONAL SUIT FOR FEMA ' S ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR THE REBUILDING OF INFRASTRUCTURE. THERE IS A 10%PRICE CONNECTED WITH THOSE FUNDS AS WELL AS THAT ' S IN WHICH THE$20.7 MILLION ORIGINATES FROM. THE SECOND CONTAINER WE ARE CALLING OUR OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE. I BELIEVE THESE PROJECTS REMAIN IN APPEALS STATUS WITH CAL OES AND ALSO FEMA BUT THEY ARE STILL UNDER REVIEW. WE ARE INCLUDING THOSE IN THE UNMET DEMAND AS IF THEY ARE EVENTUALLY REFUTED, THOSE ARE THINGS THAT THE CITY WANTS AND NEEDS TO LUG AHEAD. THE BIG INCONSISTENCY THERE IS THE CITY IS STILL CALCULATING. AN INITIAL ESTIMATE WAS AROUND$30 MILLION FOR THE FIRST BULLET OF COFFEY PARK SIDEWALKS AND ALSO CURRENTLY WE ARE CHECKING OUT A$13.5 NUMBER. AGAIN, THIS SLIDE IS FLUID AND WILL CHANGE AS THESE PROGRAMS ADVANCE. THE THIRD BULL IT IS FEMA ' S RISK MITIGATION PROGRAM. THIS IS A'COMPETITIVE PROGRAM AT THE STATE LEVEL. SO, THESE FINANCES CONTAINER ACTUALLY BE USED FOR NON-DISASTER RELATED DAMAGE, BUT TO REBUILD INFRASTRUCTURE IN An EVEN MORE RESISTANT FASHION. THE CITY ' S GOT A VARIETY OF PROJECTS THAT THEY ADVANCE UNDER THIS PROGRAM.WE HAVE INCLUDED THE WHOLE UNIVERSE OF THOSE JOBS UNTIL WE DISCOVER WHAT ARE IN FACT AUTHORIZED UNDER THAT COMPETITIVE PROCEDURE. IF THEY ARE NOT ACCEPTED, AFTER THAT THEY WILL PROCEED TO BE AN UNMET DEMAND, OR THE CITY ' S SHARE OF THAT JOB WILL BE INCLUDED IN THAT NUMBER. THE LAST PIECE IS VARIOUS OTHER RESILIENCY JOBS. THESE ARE GATHERED THROUGH INTERVIEWS VIA DEPARTMENT DEGREE STAFF. THESE ARE ITEMS THAT WOULD RISE RESILIENCY THROUGHOUT THE CITY. AN EMERGENCY OPERATION CENTER IS ONE, ACTUALLY HAVING ONE THAT IS CONVENIENTLY OFFERED AS OPPOSED TO RELOCATING PARTS.WE SPOKE WITH THE EMERGENCY SUPERVISOR. WE CALCULATED CONCERNING$101 MILLION THERE IN PROPOSED

PROJECTS. THIS BUCKET WILL CERTAINLY LIKELY NOT REMAIN IN THE $124 MILLION BECAUSE FIRST TRENCH OF MILLION. THT IN THE$ 88 MILLION. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE PROJECTS BECAUSE BCKET FOR THAT SPECIFIC COMPONENT OF THE POGRAM. THAT ' S COMING DOWN THE ROAD AS WE MOVE FORWARD. > > SIMPLY FOR CLARITY ' S BENEFIT, IN THE$122 MILLION'THAT WERE ALLOCATED THROUGH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,$04 MILLION WAS ASSIGNED TO UNMET REQUIREMENTS AND ALSO APPROXIMATELY$80 MILLION WAS ASSIGNED TO ACATEGORY THAT HUD HAS YET TO DEFINE WHICH WAS REDUCTION PROJECTS. AGAIN, THAT ' S WHY THESE PROJECTS MAYBE THINGS THAT THE COUNCIL DESIRES TO EVENTUALLY CONSIDER AS COMPONENT OF THAT'MITIGATION PORTFOLIO IN PROJECTS, BUT THOSE DOLLARS ARE STILL AS WELL AS WHILE THEY HAVE ASKED United States FR INSTANCES OF PROJECTS SUCH AS THE FIRE TERMINAL RELOCATION PROJECTS. TEY ARE LOOKING ACROSS THE COUNTRY AS REQUIREMENT AS IT ASSOCIATES WITH MITIGATION AND HAVE NT DETAILED WHAT WOULD BE ELIGIBLE AT THIS MOMENT UNDER THAT PROGRAM. THEY HAVE ASKED A GREAT DEAL OF CONCERNS, BUT THEY HAVE NOT DELINEATED WAT THE REGULATIONS WOULD BE FOR REDUCTION PROJECTS. > > VIA THE MAYOR? GIVE THANKS TO

YOU. ACTING ON THE MITIGATION PROJECTS, I THOUGHT I HEARD A PERSON MENTION THAT SOMETHING LIKE THE >> BRAND-NEW ORLEANS WHOLE LOT LIKE THE NEXT DOOR TASK COULD GO UNDER THE CDBG REDUCTION, THAT ' S SORT OF A BUYBACK RELOCATION JOB. ARE WE DISCUSSING THAT BELOW OR AT ANOTHER TIME? IS THAT CONSISTED OF IN OUR DISCUSSIONS WITH? > > SINCE NOW I DON ' T BELIEVE A BUYBACK PROGRAM REMAINS IN THE STATE ' S ACTIVITY PLAN TO MAKE SURE THAT WOULD NOT REMAIN IN THE PROGRAM. > > IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED WE WOULD ASK THE STATE'TO INCLUDE IT? > > YES, YOU WOULD DEMAND TO ASK THE STATE FOR

>> CONSIDERATION TO INCLUDE IT EITHER IN THIS PROGRAM OR A FUTURE PROGRAM >>. > > O.K., EXISTS A POSSIBILITY OF ASSISTING WITH BOOSTED BUILDING METHODS OR BUILDING MATERIALS WITHIN THIS SET OR THE STATE SET? > > ADDITIONAL STRENGTH ACTIONS? > > YES, SO, FOR INSTANCE, THERE IS VENTS THAT MAKE A DISTINCTION IF WE NEED TO MOTIVATE THE FAMILY MEMBERS >> TO USAGE BETTER VENTS, IS IT BELOW OR IN THE STATES? > > THAT WOULD NORMALLY BE IN THE PROGRAM STYLE. IN THE ACTIVITY PLAN, THE STATE WILL ESTABLISH THE SPECIFIC NEEDS AS WELL AS STANDARDS AS WELL AS THAT WILL CERTAINLY BE CONSISTED OF IN THAT, BUT IT WOULD MAKE FEELING TO REFERENCE THAT IN DEVELOPMENT. > > O.K.. IT LOOKS LIKE WE NEEDS TO SPEAK ABOUT IT EVENTUALLY PRIOR TO WE GO AND SAY IN WHICH IS IT. THANK YOU. AND ALSO I HAVE ONE VARIOUS OTHER QUESTION ABOUT INFRASTRUCTURE. >> WE PUT A WHOLE LOT OF PRODUCT IN A GARBAGE DUMP WE HADN ' T INTENDED TO PUT IN A LANDFILL. SO WE ' VE LOST GARBAGE DUMP MATERIAL TIME. WE ' VE LOST TIME ON OUR LANDFILL. IS THAT'AN FRAMEWORK NEED THAT WE'CAN REQUEST HERE? > > SO I THINK THAT'COMPONENT OF THE ON GOING DISCUSSION

WITH THE STATE THAT THE REGION IS LEADING IS ASKING FOR MERCIES AND ALSO THIS IS A MULTICOUNTY EFFORT ON THE PARTICLES TRANSPORTING. I ' M NOT AWARE THAT THAT HAS ACTUALLY BEEN FIXED AT THAT PINT, BUT IF YOU DO INTEND TO MENTION I AS A REMARK,'WE MORE THAN HAPPY TO CONSIST OF IF THE COUNCIL WISHES TO RELOCATE THAT IN THE LATER REPORT THING. WE CAN NOTE THAT. IT HAS ACTUALLY NOT BEEN CONTEMPLATED TO DAY BECAUSE IT WAS WORKING THROUGH A PROCEDURES OF AS I STATED OF MERCY ON TE USEFUL LIFE DEGRADATION OF LANDFILLS TO NEED TO TAKE THE PRODUCT FROM THE FIRES. > > OK. POSSIBLY AT THE NEXT POINT, BUT NOT AT THIS FACTOR. THANK YOU. > > RIGHT, SIMPLY TO CLARIFY. THESE ARE THINGS THAT WE WOULD BE SPEAKING >> ABOUT IN OUR LATER DISCUSSION ABOUT THE STATE ACTIVITY STRATEGY. > > MANY THANKS >>. YEAH? > > [INAUDIBLE] > > THAT REALLY WRAPS UP THE DISCUSSION. WE HOPE IT WAS INFORMATIVE AND THAT MAY AID >> THE DISCUSSION FOR >> THE COMPLYING WITH THING, BUT WE ENJOY TO RESPONSE ANY INQUIRIES. > > ARE THERE ANY FURTHER INQUIRIES AT THIS MOMENT? > > I JUST INTENDED TO RESTATE THAT IT IS STAFF ' S INTENTION TO DEAL WITH A DEMAND OF THE STATE AND THOSE DISCUSSIONS IN FACT STARTED THE OTHER DAY WHEN HAGGERTY AS WELL AS THE STATE ' S CONSULTING TEAM SAT TO DEVELOP AN ADDITIONAL REQUEST FOR EXTRA DOLLARS BASED ON THIS EVALUATION. > > I JUST WISHED TO ENSURE THAT I ' M DOING MY MATHEMATICS APPROPRIATELY RIGHT HERE THAT OUR COMPANIED BELIEVE WE ' VE GOT ABOUT$300 MILLION IN ELIGIBLE UNMET REQUIRES AT THIS POINT, AND ALSO REGARDING$97 MLLION OF THOSE ARE REAL ESTATE REQUIRES? IS THAT CORRECT? > >> CORRECT. > > THANK YOU. WE ' VE GOT A PAIR OF CARDS ON THIS. TERRY SWAURDZ, COMPLIED WITH BY GREGORY. PUBLIC AUDIO SPEAKER: GOOD NIGHT, MAYOR COURSEY, CITY BOARD MEMBERS, TEAM CONSULTANTS AND MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC. MY NAME IS >> TERRY SHORE, THE REGIONAL SUPERVISOR FOR THE NORTH BAY FOR GREEN BELT ALLIANCE. I DID PROVIDE SOME DESCRIBED REMARKS THAT I E-MAILED TO YOU SHORTLY BEFORE THE CONFERENCE, SO I WILL SUM UP THOSE.I WILL CERTAINLY BEGINNING BY PHRASE I DID ATTEND TE PUBLIC HEARING LAST EVENING BY THE THE GOLDEN STATE HCD AND A REPRESENTATIVE WILL BE BELOW TONIGHT TO PROVIDE YOU A DISCUSSION AND ALSO IT WAS REALLY PRACTICAL IN UNDERSTANDING EVEN MORE OF WHAT WAS HAPPENING RIGHT HERE.

I WISH TO DISCUSS 2 POINTS WHICH IS THE ALLOCATION OF THE USAGE CALAMITY FUNDS FOR HOUSING. THE NUMBER THAT I HEARD LAST EVENING FOR MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS FROM THE STATE HAD TO DO WITH $38.5 MILLION, AND WE PROMPTED THE CITY COUNCIL TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT FINANCING GOES TO MOSTLY LOW INCOME REAL ESTATE AS WELL AS WE PROMPT YOU TO CONSIDER INVESTING STANDARD TO WHAT RESEMBLED WHAT WE HAD IN MEASURE M WHICH IS 75% MONEY GOING TO REAL ESTATE FOR UP TO 80 %AMI AND UP TO 120 AMI. PROJECTS SIMILAR TO THE CORITAS TASKS, WE WOULD HOPE YOU WOULD PRIORITIZE THOSE KINDS OF JOBS AND ALSO THE ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY ' S ELEMENTAL PRINCIPLES MOVING FORWARD. THE OTHER PRODUCT IS THE UNMET DEMANDS THAT WERE STATED. GREENBELT ALLIANCE WOULD URGE SANTA ROSA TO HAVE THE HARD DISCUSSIONS ABOUT LAND USAGE POLICY BECAUSE WE KNOW AND HAVE KNOWN FOR A VERY LENGTHY TIME THAT THE HIGHEST DANGER FOR LOSS OF RESIDENCE AND ALSO'LIFE IS BECAUSE OF REAL ESTATE THICKNESS AND THE PLACE OF THE HOMES. IT ' S A HIGHER VARIABLE THAN ANY OTHER FACTORS THAT WE ARE ACQUAINTED WITH LIKE TOPOGRAPHY, DEFENSABLE SPACE AND BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. THE HIGHEST POSSIBLE RISK FACTOR IS PLACE OF THE HOUSES, RURAL SPRAWL AND ALSO THE WUWI. I HAVE THIS BOOK THAT I INTEND TO PRESENT T THE MAYOR AND THE COUNCIL ABOUT THIS INCLUDING LAND USAGE AND ALSO INCLUDING GET AND VOLUNTARY OPPORTUNITIES FOR PEOPLE TO VACATE THE AREA AND DO THAT WITH SEVERAL OF THIS FUNDING, MAYBE DO A PILOT PROJECT HERE IN THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA FOR FOUNTAIN GROVE.SO I WOULD LOVE TO PRESENT THIS AND ALSO BRING THIS DOWN. > > THANKS. > > TO THE MAYOR RIGHT NOW. > > YOU CAN LEAVE THAT WITH JULIE UPSTAIRS THERE. > > AND ALSO LIKEWISE MY COMMENTS. > > GREGORY FURAN? PUBLIC AUDIO SPEAKER: MAYOR, MAYBES OF THE COUNCIL. MY NAME IS GREGORY FURAN. IF YOU TIN GO BACK TO THE SLIDE, I WANT TO NAME THE 3 FACTOR, THE 3 POINTS

, LOW TO MODERATE EARNINGS AND ALSO THE SLUMS AND ALSO REQUIREMENT TO >> HAVING A >> SPECIFIC URGENCY. >> THIS RECORD IS OBVIOUS, IT ' S A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY RECORD.> IT ' S NOT A PEOPLE REPORT. RENTERS AND HOMELESS ARE NOT ALSO TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION IN THIS. AND ALSO WE REALLY THINK THAT THOSE 2 POINTS PROFITING LOW AND ALSO MODERATE EARNINGS PARTICULARLY THOSE OUGHT TO BE GIVEN HIGHER TOP PRIORITY IS BEING HOMELESS AND ALSO A LOT OF THE REPAYMENT YOU ARE OBTAINING IS SHORT. THE STATE IS GETTING LSS FROM THE FEDS THAT THEY ANTICIPATE AND ALSO YOU ARE OBTAINING LESS FROM THE STATE THAT YOU EXPECT. IT WILL CERTAINLY BE HIGHER TO PRIORITIZE ON SUCH A TITAN REQUIREMENT BUT I INTEND TO REMIND YOU THE NED FOR THE HOMELESS AND LOW INCOME AND ALSO I WOULD REMIND YOU TO GO LOW TO INCREDIBLY LOW AND ALSO THOSE OTHER CLASSIFICATIONS HAVE BIG DEMANDS AS WELL AS THOSE ARE THE THE MAJORITY OF VULNERABLE AND I WOULD ASK YOU TO PLEASE CONSIDER THAT.THANK YOU. > > MANY THANKS. THOMAS PHELPS. SPEAKER: THANKS FOR THE POSSIBILITY TO COMING PRECISELY THE HEELS OF THE REAL ESTATE AUTHORITY MEETING IN WHICH WE WERE GIVEN THIS INFORMATION $38.5 MILLION UPCOMING PERHAPS FROM THE STATE, BUT DIRECTING TO MULTIFAMILY PRIMARILY. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO CALL YOUR INTEREST TO THE EXTREMELY LOW AND ALSO INCREDIBLY LOW INCOME SECTION OF THE REAL ESTATE COMPLIMENT. >> THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO MIGHT HAVE, I MEAN, I SIMPLY RETURNED FROM PARADISE AS WELL AS CHICO AND ALSO THERE WERE LOTS OF COMPARABLE TO RIGHT HERE WHO WERE MAYBE RENTING BUT NOT ON A LEASE, AND IF YOU WERE OUT A LASE, YOU DD NOT OBTAIN ANY ASSISTANCE FROM FEMA AND THAT OCCURRED OCCASIONALLY ARE LOTS OF PEOPLE WHO ARE HOMELESS FROM THAT AS WELL AS THEY WOULD NOT BE CONSISTED OF IN THOSE COMPONENTS AS A RESULT OF THEIR INCOMES AS WE ALREADY KOW THAT 80% OF SONOMA REGION PAID 50% OR MRE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING. THAT ' S REALLY CONSUMING SO MUCH OF THEIR BUDGETS AND THEY REALLY DON ' T COME UNDER ANY OF THESE CATEGORIES. IT TAKES 2-3 INDIVIDUALS TO ACTUALLY RENTAL FEE A LOCATION. PLEASE CONSIDER THE EXCEPTIONALLY LOW AND EXTREMELY LOW INCOME, AND ALSO SIMPLY OBTAINING A SMALL PORTION OF THIS $38.5 MILLION CANISTER FRUIT AND VEGETABLES REALLY LARGE CAUSE THAT AREA PARTICULARLY WITH RESPECT TO THE SECURE CAR PARK WHICH IS COMING AGAIN. LITTLE RESIDENCES, THESE THINGS CONTAINER REALLY PRODUCE A WONDERFUL ADVANTAGE FOR THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE HOMELESS OR IN THE PARTICULARLY IN THESE AREAS OF OR COULD BE HOMELESS OR ARE HOMELESS, LET ' S PUT IT THIS WAY BECAUSE THEY REMAIN IN THESE REALLY LOW EARNINGS CONSIDERING ALL THE RISE IN RENTS AND SO FORTH AS A RESULT OF THE FIRE. IT IS A FIRE REDUCTION, IF YOU WILL, THAT EVERYBODY IS BEING AFFECTED BY IT. AS A MATTER OF FACT, I WILL TAKE THE LAST FEW SEC TO SAY THAT INDIVIDUALS IN BUTTE COUNTY ARE BEING DELIVERED OT OF THE COUNTY. THEY DON ' T HAVE ANY HOUSING THERE. THEY DIDN ' T HAVE ANY REAL ESTATE AND ALSO THEY RESEMBLE 1%AND THEY ARE BEING PAID TO HEAD TO OTHER COUNTIES. THEY DON ' T HAVE SHELTERS IN BUTTE REGION. THEY ARE BEING SHELTERED IN YUBA AREA AND ALSO NORTHERN COUNTY. I CAN ' T RECALL THE NAME OF THE REGION NOW, BUT THEY HAVE BEEN MOVING THEM OUT OF THE AREA, AND ALSO THE FACT OF THOSE PEOPLE RELOCATED OUT OF THE REGION, THEY NO MORE HAVE A 10 %RENTAL FEE CAP, RIGHT? BECAUSE THERE IS NO PROCEDURE OF– DECLARATION OF EMERGENCIES IN THOSE COUNTIES. PLEASE CONSIDER THIS RIGHT HERE. THANK YOU. > >'THANKS, PETER TURNER? SPEAKER: THANKS. REGARDING USING WHAT FUNDS ARE READILY AVAILABLE FOR THE HOMELESS, I INDICATE, I WISH TO OFFER A THUMBS AS MUCH AS BOTH LAST TWO SPEAKERS FOREMAN– WE ARE ALL HOMELESS TILL WE OPEN THE LAND WHICH IS ISRAEL WHICH IS BENEATH OUR FEET. I WISH TO GIVE A CALL OUT TO ALL TRUE WARRIORS, ALL THE GOLDEN STATE VETS ON THIS SUBJECT RECOGNIZING THAT 74%OF ALL EARNINGS ACCUMULATED BY THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE COMES FROM THE GOLDEN STATE. AND ALSO GIVEN THAT THERE IS> NO CONCERN THAT THESE 2 YEARS ARE FEEDING INSTITUTIONS BE ILLUSORY OR TREATING THIS. I AM PETER AND ALSO I AM RESOLVING YOU AND ALSO TELLING YOU ALL THIS THIS DEBT OF THE FEDERAL DEBT IS GONE AND NEVER EXISTED. IT ' S ALL BASED ON TREASON AS WELL AS MURDER. IT ' S GONE. TO THE VETERINARIANS WHO DIED ON THE FIELD, MURDERED BY VACCINATIONS, WHO ARE AGED AMONG THE HOMELESS, VETERANS REALIZE THAT ROCKEFELLER SOLD TO CHINESE COMMUNIST ARMED FORCE. VETS WHO TAKE VOW TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND VETERANS WHO TAKE TO CALIFORNIA REGULATION ENFORCEMENT AS WELL AS FOR ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY BERET AND ALSO VETERANS HAVE ONE EVEN MORE TO TAKE AND THAT IS CAPITOL HILLSIDE. FOR YOU EXPERTS, I ASK, I REGULATE, I HOPE, A RISE AND RISEN OVER THIS BUSTED CHAIN WHICH IS PRISON. THE MOMENT IS CURRENTLY TO JOIN WHAT THE REMAINDER OF U AND SIMPLY ACQUIRING OFF PROTECTION. PAY SAY GOODBYE TO CASH, PAY NO MORE RENTAL FEES. WHAT ARE WE DOING? WE ARE PRESERVING THE REALLY INSANITY. AS I CAPTIVATE, THESE INDIVIDUALS ARE WANTING TO DO THE RIGHT THING, BUT THEY CONTAINER NOT DO WHAT THE EXPERTS, THE EMPLOYEES, WHAT THEY DO WITH EACH OTHER WHICH SUFFICES TO CHANGE THE WEATHER. THE SUPPLY AND ALSO DEMAND BY WHOSE COMMAND, THE LENDERS? I ' M NOT BELOW TO BE SLAVES TO THEM.THE 40-YEAR STRIKE EXTINGUISHES THEIR INSANITY, IT ' S LIKE FIRE, A RISK AND SERVANT THAT WILL BE MATCHED WITH THE NEEDS OF THE 48 STRIKE. THEY WILL CERTAINLY SUSTAIN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE PROFESSIONALS AS WE CLOSURE THIS VACATION OF THE CARNAGE OF CHRIST. > > THANK YOU. > > IT ' S CALLED SATAN. AKA SANTA. > > THANKS, WE ' LL BRING IT BACK TO COUNCIL. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE COUNCIL ON THIS? MR. TIBBETS? > > COUNCILMEMBER JACK TIBBETTS: THANK YOU, MAYOR, ONE CONCERN I HAD IS WHEN TAKING A LOOK AT THESE FINANCES ONE UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IT ' S PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE ONE OF THE MOST EVEN MORE BANG FOR YOUR BUCK IN MULTI-HOUSE. IS CDBG DR BEING ABLE TO BE USED FOR LOCAL SUIT FOR A GREAT DEAL OF THESE FINANCING SOURCES FRESHLY AUTHORIZED PROPOSAL ONE. WHAT I ' M LOOKING FOR IS WHAT IS THE >> FINEST USE OF THE CASH TO CREATE ONE OF THE MOST QUANTITIES> OF HOUSING? > >'IT COULD BE USED FOR RESIDENT MATCH IF THAT IS THE INTENT AND CURRENTLY VERIFIED BY THE STATE TO BE FOR >>LOCAL SUIT PASSED IN PROP 1 AS WELL AS 2. > > THANKS. > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: THANK YOU REALLY MUCH. > > WE ' LL GO ON TO THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING'. MR. GOMEZ, PLEASE PROGRAM. > > LET THE RECORD PROGRAM THAT ALL COUNCIL PARTICIPANTS ARE PRESENT EXCEPT– THE COUNCIL MET ON PRODUCT 2.1 AND OFFERED DIRECTION TO STAFF. > > THANKS, WE HAVE NO ANNOUNCEMENT OR DISCUSSIONS. IS THERE A PERSONNEL INSTRUCTION ON THE FIRE RECUPERATION? > > NOT THIS NIGHT. > > YES, MS. COMBS? >> > > COUNCILMEMBER JULIE COMBS: I HAVE A CONCERN GOING ON WITH THE CURRENT FIRE IN BUTTE. A VARIETY OF INDIVIDUALS WERE INFLUENCED

>> BECAUSE THEIR YOUNGSTERS NEEDED TO STAY AT HOME FROM SCHOOL, SO TEY HAD TO EITHER >> LOSE WORK OR HAD TO PAY CHILDCARE, AND A FEW OF THEM HAD MEDICAL EXPENDITURES CONNECTED WITH THE STUFF IN THE AIR THAT CAUSED LUNG CONCERNS. ARE ANY ONE OF OUR RESIDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR REPAYMENT THROUGH FEMA AS A RESULT OF THAT FIRE? >> > > WE WILL TAKE IT UNDER CONSIDERATION. I DO NOT HAVE AN SOLUTION THIS EENING. > > THANKS. > > THANK YOU>. CITY SUPERVISOR REPORT >> TNIGHT? >>> > YES, I DO HAVE A REPORT.I INTEND TO SAY THANKS TO THE CITY EMPLOYEES THAT I ' M GOING TO ACKNOWLEDGE TONIGHT. THEY EITHER HAVE OR REMAIN IN THE PROCEDURES OF OFFERING AS COMMON AID RESPONDERS AROUND THE STATE. FIRST OF ALL NEIL BREGMAN THAT WAS DOWN IN THE CITY OF MALIBU. THE FIRE AND ALSO FOLKS THAT HAVE ACTUALLY ALL AIDED IN BUTTE AREA IN THE FIRE AS WELL AS IN THE PROCEDURES AS WELL AS LOTS OF OFFERED UP THEIR THANKSGIVING TO PERFORM SO. FROM THE CITY SUPERVISORS OFFICE. JASON, FROM TRANSPORT> OF PUBLIC FUNCTIONS, DAVID DE LA ROSA FROM PREPARATION AND ALSO ECONOMIC ADVANCEMENT AND >> MLISSA AND ALSO DAVID DID YOU LIVE MALE FROM THE POLICE DIVISION>. THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT.

> > MAYOR CHRIS CURSEY: THANKS AND THANKS TO THOSE WORKERS FOR THEIR COMMON HELP WORK. WE GAINED FROM INDIVIDUALS FROM AROUND THE CITY AND THE STATE IN 2015 AS WELL AS IT ' S GOOD TO BE ABLE TO PAY THAT BACK. MS. GALLAGHER, DO YOU HAVE A RECORD TONIGHT? > > ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO RECORD THIS EVENING. > > THANK YOU. ANY STATEMENTS OF ABSTENTION FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS TONIGHT? > > MAYOR, I WS ABSENT FOM THE LAST MEETING. I WILL BE ABSTAINING FROM THOSE MINUTES. > > THANKS. WE ' LL ACTION ON TO MAYOR AND ALSO COUNCIL MEMBERS RECORDS. ANY PERSON INTEND TO BEGINNING THAT? ANYTHING DOWN HERE? MS. COMBS? > > COUNCILMEMBER JULIE COMBS: THANKS, MAYOR.

>>I ' M GOING TO LOSE CONSCIOUSNESS SOME PRODUCTS ON THE A LOT OF RECENT CASA COMPONENT RECAP. YOU MAY RECALL CASA IS THE LOCAL COMMITTEE TO HOUSING FOR THE BAY LOCATION DEVELOPED BY MTC AND A BAG AND IS WORKING ON CREATE– ING A COMPACT LIKELY TO MOVE FORWARD TO THE LEGISLATURE IN JANUARY>, AND THINGS HAVE BEEN CONTINUING TO RELOCATION RIGHT ALONG. SEVERAL THINGS HAVE BEEN– YOU WILL CERTAINLY NOTICE THAT IT ' S A 2-SIDED WEB PAGE. IT ' S GONE FROM 17 PRODUCTS TO 10 ITEMS. THERE IS A BRIEF RECAP THERE OF 10 PRODUCTS PRESENTLY TOGETHER IN THE COMPACT, AND THERE IS AN OVERLAY THAT DEMONSTRATES HOW SB 35 INFLUENCES INCLUSIONARY >>LAWS IN EACH LOCATION TODAY, AND ALSO THERE'IS STRONG CONVERSATION OF WHETHER OR NOT TO MAKE CHANGES TO THE WAY SB 35 IS AMENDED.SO THAT ' S GOING ONWARD. THERE IS A GREAT DEAL OF DISCUSSION ABOUT, AND ALSO WHAT HIGH THOUGHT WAS An INTERESTING PHRASE FROM THE LEGISLATURE IS CALLED DOUBLE SIGNED UP WITH. THE SUGGESTION IS THAT CANISTER ' T GO FRWARD WITHOUT THE OTHER ELEMENT.

> > THROUGH THE MAYOR? > > ADDED DURABILITY MEASURES? > > YOU TIN LEAVE THAT WITH JULIE UPSTAIRS THERE. > > THANK YOU. > > THANK YOU.S, THERE ARE SOME VERY WONDERFUL COMPONENTS FOR STREAM LINING, REDUCING EXPENSES, COVERING COSTS, IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC ATMOSPHERE FOR DEVELOPERS. IT HAS SPOKEN ABOUT DOUBLE JOINTING THOSE WTH TENET PROTECTIONS TO ENSURE THAT THEY BOTH MOVE FORWARD TOGETHER.

THAT'' S TYPE OF THE DIRECTION THINGS ARE GOING RIGHT NOW, AS WELL AS I WILL BE GOING TO NEW YORK CITY WITH THE GROUP AT THE END OF NEXT WEEK IN ORDER TO SEE SOME INFORMATION WITH REGARD TO REAL ESTATE PLANS THAT NEW YORK CITY HAS RELOCATED AHEAD EFFECTIVELY. I REMAIN TO MAKE THE SITUATION FOR OUR AREA THAT THERE REQUIRES T BE A GEOGRAPHICAL OVERLAY THAT IDENTIFIES THE FINANCIAL DISTINCTIONS IN BETWEEN CITIES. FOR EXAMPLE, A DEMAND OF 15% AFFORDABILITY FOR ALL JOBS MIGHT BE NO PROBLEM AT ALL FOR SAN FRANCISCO TO GET IT AS WELL AS NOT IMPACT THEIR MARKET AT ALL, BUT IT MAY CAUSE A PROBLEM RIGHT HERE OR 20% OR 5% IF IT'' S VERY OR VERY LOW. SO WE ARE TRYING, I'' M TRYING TO WORK ON OBTAINING AN OVERLAY TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT WE ARE USING A SCALPEL AS WELL AS NOT A HAMMER AS WE ARE RESOLVING SOME OF THE FINANCIAL ASPECTS. AND I HAVE ONE VARIOUS OTHER INQUIRY. I HAD THE GOOD LUCK OF HAVING THAT FIRST CONFERENCE ON THE LEADERSHIP BODY FOR THE HOMELESS WHAT YOU CALL COC, IT'' S LIKE A J PEG LIKE COC WITH MY COLLEAGUES, AND ALSO IT LOOKS AS IF WE WILL BE MAKING A SIGNIFICANT DECISION ON DECEMBER 10TH REGARDING ALLOCATIONS INTO BUCKETS.WE DON '

T HAVE TO SPECIFY ABOUT HOW THESE VARIOUS BUCKETS OF MONEY WILL CERTAINLY BE SPENT, TRENCHES PERHAPS, BUT WE WILL REQUIRE TO BE SAYING ROUGHLY THIS MUCH OR THIS PERCENT OF THE FUNDS ENTERS INTO THIS KEY IN OF HOMELESS SERVICE OR BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION OR THIS VARIOUS AREA. THERE ARE A NUMBERS OF VARIOUS BUCKETS THAT HUD WANTS TO LEARN THROUGH United States AND WE WILL CERTAINLY REQUIRE TO MAKE THAT DECISION ON DECEMBER 10TH.

WE AREN'' T GOING TO HAVE TIME TO SHARE WITH YOU ALL THE DETAILS IN BETWEEN FROM TIME TO TIME, AND ALSO THERE WILL CERTAINLY BE MORE IN-DEPTH DECISIONS BEING MADE IN JANUARY. SO, MY ASSOCIATE AND I ARE KIND OF TAKING IT TO THE COUNCIL. DO YOU WANT US TO PROCEED AND ALSO USE OUR BEST JUDGMENT REGARDING HOW THOSE PAILS ARE DESIGNATED OR– ALIGN OR DO YOU WANT US TO BRING THIS BACK TO YOU WHEN IT COME TO THOSE DOLLARS OR WHAT DO YOU VIEW OUR AUTHORITY TO B? >> > > BECAUSE THIS IS NOT ON THE PROGRAM THAT IS WHAT WE ARE GOING TO REQUIREMENT YOU TO PERFORM IS USAGE YOUR BEST JUDGMENT. >> > > THERE IS AN CHANCE TO HAVE A DISCUSSION THE FIRST WEEK IN DECEMBER, AND THEN THERE WOULD BE ANOTHER PERSON OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE IT AFTER THE PRELIMINARY PAILS ARE DETERMINED WHEN WE ARE DOING MORE FINE INFORMATION WORK. SO I ASSUMPTION W WOULD REQUIREMENT TO BRING THAT FORWARD IF WE INTEND TO HAVE THE DISCUSSION. >> > >'WE ' LL CHECK OUT THAT, YOUR CHOICES. >> > > MANY THANKS, I APPRECIATE IT. THANKS. >> > > IF I MAY, THE MATERIALS THAT YOU PROVIDED TO THE COUNCIL ON CASA, CAN WE SEE TO IT THERE ARE DUPLICATES ALSO READILY AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC? >> > > YES, AND ALSO I HAVE ADDITIONALS.

>> > > MANY THANKS >>. > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: THANK YOU, ANY OTHER COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS? SEEING NONE, WE'' LL PROCEED TO PRODUCT 10.2.1. LIBRARY COMMISSION, JOINT COMPENSATION APPOINTMENT. THIS RETURNED TO SEPTEMBER WHEN WE HAD THE APPOINTEES AS WELL AS THE COMPENSATION. I SAY SORRY TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF HOW A JOINT CITY COUNTY COMMISSIONER IS APPOINTED. I BELIEVE WE'' VE GOT THAT STRAIGHTENED. MYSELF AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CHAIRMAN GORE ARE ADVISING THE CONSULTATION OF KAREN SCHNEIDER TO THE CITY AREA PORT ON THE COMMISSION.SHE WAS THE COUNCIL ' S FRONT RUNNER, AND WE NEED TO RTIFY THAT AT THIS MOMENT TONIGHT. I WOULD ACTION THAT THE COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE APPOINTMENT OF KAREN SCHNEIDER AS THE CITY REGION COMMISSIONER TO THE SONOMA AREA COLLECTION COMPENSATION TO SERVE A 4-YEAR TERM. > > SECOND. > > THANKS, MR. TIBBETS. >> YOUR VOTES, PLEASE. THAT PASSES WITH 6 AYES. THANK YOU. CARRYING ON TO 10.3.1. >> > > WASN ' T THERE A SECOND SEAT? >> > > THERE WAS. ON SEPTEMBER 4TH, WE VOTED TO MAKE DAVID CAHILL THE SECONDLY CONSULTATION IF KAREN SCHNEIDER CAME TO BE THE APPOINTEE. OUR APPOINTEES ARE KAREN SCHNEIDER AND ALSO DAVID CAHILL. MULE MOVING ON 10.3.1. MR. TIBBETS, THIS WAS A REQUEST FROM YOU TO PUT THIS ON A FUTURE AGENDA. WHAT WE HAVE PRIOR TO United States TONIGHT IS TO ELECT AS TO WHETHER T PUT THIS ON A MORE SCHEDULE.

I HAVE A STACK OF CARDS PEOPLE WANTING TO DISCUSS THIS. IN THE PAST WE HAVE NOT PUT THIS ON AS AN ITEM FROM PUBLIC COMMENT TO PUT THIS ON COUNCIL. >> > > THANKS. I WOULD LIKE TO GAIN EVEN MORE DETAILS ON WHAT IS A CERTIFICATE FOR INFO UTILIZING RPTT FINANCES. IF WE CN RELOCATE THIS FORWARD FOR RPTT CERTIFICATE TO PROPOSE FURTHER REAL ESTATE. WE CAN PRODUCE A LOCAL MATCH CHANCE APPROXIMATELY $68 MILLION IF LEVERAGED FOR FINANCING IN THE JUST RECENTLY CONSISTED OF PROP 2 FUNDS TO ROUGHLY 5 HUNDRED $500 MILLION FOR REAL ESTATE AND ALSO BASED ON ALAMEDA EXPERIENCE RETURN FOR EACH $1 IN NEIGHBORHOOD SUIT. >> > > MR. TIBBETS, CONTAINER ISTOP YOU FOR 1 MIN. I'' M ASKING THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO REFRAIN FROM REMARK. THIS IS A WHETHER OR NOT ARE WE GOING TO PUT THIS ON THE AGENDA. I WEAR'' T KNOW IF SAYING THE POINT APPERTAINS >> AT THIS MOMENT. > > DUE TO THE FACT THAT SPEAKING WITH YOU AS WELL AS IN FACTOR TO CONSIDER OF THE BROWN ACT, I NEEDED TO KNOW IF THIS IS FEASIBLE AS WELL AS I INTEND TO SOLUTION THAT PLAINLY INDEED, IT IS.

>> > > ONCE MORE, MR. TIBBETS, IF WE CANISTER PUT THIS ON A CUNCIL SCHEDULE, WE CAN GET PERSONNEL INPUT ON THIS AND ALSO WE CONTAINER HAVE A ROBUST DISCUSSION AT COUNCIL LEVEL. TODAY IS WHETHER OR NOT WE ARE GOING TO PUT THAT ON THE SCHEDULE OR OTHERWISE. IS THERE A SECOND TO MR. TIBBETS? >> > > I WILL SECOND THAT. >> > > WE HAVE An ACTIVITY AND A SECONDLY. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? YOUR VOTES, PLEASE. THAT PASSES WITH 6 AYES. WE'' LL OBTAIN THAT AGENDAIZED IN THE FTURE. >> > > IF I MAY, PERHAPS THE CITY LAWYER CONTAINER EVALUATION THE DEVELOPMENT FOR HOW THIS SYSTEM ENTERED INTO IMPACT SINCE I THINK THERE WAS A PROBLEM AT THE TIME IT WAS DEVELOPED THAT THE FOUR COMPONENT VOTE HAD THE POSSIBILITY FOR CONVERSATION WHICH THAT'' S HOW IT HAPPENED. I JUST WISHED TO VALIDATE WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY IF THAT'' S CORRECT OR NOT AT A FUTURE TIME.

>> > > AND YOU CAN ALWAYS EVALUATION THESE POLICIES AT YOUR DISCRETION AS WELL AS I WOULD SUGGEST THAT AT OBJECTIVE ESTABLISHING THAT COULD BE A TOPIC FOR DISCUSSION. >>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: THANK YOU. GOING ON TO THING 11. AUTHORIZATION OF MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 16TH, OCTOBER 23, RD, I BELIEVE YOU SAID YOU ARE AVOIDING OCTOBER 16TH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, REVISIONS, IMPROVEMENTS? WE'' LL ACCEPT THOSE AS SUBMITTED. RELOCATING ON TO THE CONSENT CALENDAR. MR. McGLEN. >> > > YES, THING 12.1. RESOLUTION, PROFESSIONAL SOLUTIONS AGREEMENT WITH DYETT AS WELL AS BHATIA URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNERS DOWNTOWN STATION AREA SPECIFIC PLAN. 12.2. RESOLUTION, PROFESSIONAL SOLUTIONS AGREEMENT WITH CARLYLE MACY INC. TO SUPPLY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE SOLUTIONS TO PREPARE A PLAN OF ATTACK PRODUCT 12.3.

RESOLUTION STEP O OPTION GRANT PROGRAM CYCLE YEAR 2 FINANCING SUGGESTIONS AS WELL AS AUTHORIZATION TO APPROVE FINANCING CONTRACTS. >> > > PRODUCT 12.4. RESOLUTION APPROVAL OF 2ND CHANGE TO EXPERT SERVICES CONTRACTS WITH RENNIE PUBLIC REGULATION GROUP LLP FOR LABOR AND WORK SERVICES, THING 12.5. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZATION OF MUTES YOU'' LL NON-DISCLOSURE ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN SONOMA REGION ON SOLVE LLC THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA TO ALLOW THE USE OF CERTAIN SANTA ROSA WATER CONSUMER DATA FOR EMERGENCY NOTICE PURPOSES, THING 12.6, READING, THING 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, 12.9. 12.10. >> > > I HAVE An INQUIRY PERTAINING TO PRODUCT 12.9. I WANT TO MAKE SURE THIS IS NOTED THAT FOR CHILDREN, NO SPARRING UNDER THE AGE OF 14 YEARS.

SPARRING AND ALSO HEAD INJURY HAS BEEN KNOWN WITH BOXING. >> > > THE FUNDING FOR THE SALVATION ARMY DOUBLE PUNCHES IS ONLY FOR THE COACHING ASSISTANCE. >> > > THAT IS NOT WHAT IS IN OUR SUMMARY OF THE PROGRAM. THE SUMMARY OF THE PROGRAM SAYS ENHANCING FITNESS DEVELOPMENT BY BOXING. >> > > FOR THE COMPANY ITSELF, BUT OUR MONEY PARTICULARLY GOES TWARDS THE TUTORING PROGRAM. >> > > DO THEY DO BOXING WITH, ARE THEY SPARRING WITH CHILDREN UNDER THE AGES OF 14? >> > > NOT WITH OUR MONEY. >> > > NOT WITH OUR CASH, BUT THEY ARE DOING IT SOMEWHERE ELSE? >> > > YES. OUR MONEY ESPECIALLY DOES NOT GO TOWARDS ANY OF THE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF THE ORGANIZATION. >> > > I WANT TO PULL THIS ITEM BECAUSE I CAN NOT IN GREAT CONFIDENCE BALLOT FOR AN ITEM THAT CONSISTS OF YOUNGSTERS HITTING EACH OTHER IN THE HEAD. >> > > WE CAN BALLOT ON THAT PARTICULAR INDIVIDUALLY. >> > > THANKS >>. > > ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COUNCIL? >> YES, MR. SCHWEDHELM? > > ITEM 12.6. > >> HI, NEIL BREGMAN, EMERGENCY MANAGER. >> > > IN THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, WERE YOU CONSISTED OF IN THAT? >> >

>> > DEFINITELY. > > GREAT. WILL THIS SOFTWARE APPLICATION COMMUNICATE WITH THE COUNTY? > > NOW THE COUNTY DOESN'' T HAVE ANY SOFTWARE PROGRAM, BUT IF THE AREA DOESN ' T PURCHASE ONE, THEY CAN HAVE A READ ONLY VERSION BUT NOT UTILIZING PASS WORDS TO SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING. LATER ON, THIS SOFTWARE HAS THE ABILITY TO INTERFACE WITH ANYTHING THE COUNTY MAY ACQUISITION. THIS ON THE BACKSIDE NOT BEING TECHNOLOGICAL WE ARE SHOW TO INTERNET BOC. >> > > WILL THAT BE A FUTURE CONVERSATION OR WAS THERE A CONVERSATION FROM THE CITY ASKING THE COUNTY THAT WE ARE CONCERNING TO GET THIS? >> >

> THERE WAS. BRENDAN CAN SPEAK WITH THIS. WE LEFT THIS AS AN OPTION AS PART OF THE RFP THAT THE REGION CAN WITH PROPER VIEW CANISTER TESTIMONIAL THIS PROCEDURE. >> > > NOT ONLY FOR THE AREA BUT OBVIOUSLY THAT IS THE MOST TYPICAL ONE. >> > > ANY CITY >>. > > IN ORDER TO ASSIST IN A PROPER PURCHASE FOR FEMA GUIDELINES YOU NEED TO HAVE INCLUSIVITY WITH THE WHOLE PROCESS AND WE HAD THEM PARTICIPATE IN AND ALSO HELP WITH IN PHASE 2 OF THE ITEM. I'' M SPEAKING ON A REGULAR BASIS WITH MILES AN– MY COUNTER PART, SO THEY CAN TAKE A LOOK AT THIS HOLISTICALLY AND WE INCLUDED THE LANGUAGE TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT IT IS NOT ONLY PIGGY BACKABLE BY THE AREA BUT ALSO BY OTHER RESIDENT AGENCIES, TOWNS, CITIES WITHIN THE STATE.

>> > > FANTASTIC, THAT'' S REALLY VALUABLE. SINCE IT SPEAKS ABOUT VARIOUS EVENTS, in WHAT OTHER WAYS WILL CERTAINLY THIS SOFTWARE BE MADE USE OF. THE POLICE DIVISION DID SOME ACTIVE SHOOTER TRAINING. WILL THIS SOFTWARE BE AVAILABLE IN OTHER DEPARTMENTS AS WELL AS HOW WILL THEY BE UTILIZING THIS? >> > > DEFINITELY. THERE ARE A VARIETY OF USERS ON IT AND THAT WILL GO TO TO THIS IN THE CITY. THE MAYOR, TRAINING SENSIBLE THAT WILL CERTAINLY ACCOMMODATE A FRAMEWORK FOR AWARENESS AS WELL AS FOR EVENTS, THESE ARE AVAILABLE.AND YOU ASKED ABOUT ITS ABILITY TO BE ABLE TO INTERACT WITH OTHER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS. THERE ARE SUBJECTS FROM CITY FUNCTIONS THAT WILL CERTAINLY BE ABLE TO USE THIS AS WELL AS IT HAS MULTIPLE USES AS WELL AS WE INTEND TO USAGE ON A DAY TO DAY BASIS AS WELL AS AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE. THE PARADIGM IS NOT TO SIMPLY UTILIZE IT IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION BUT TO SHOT TO USE IT EVERYDAY SO PEOPLE KNOW WITH IT AND ALSO SO THEY CANISTER USE IT IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. > > THAT WAS MY CONCERN. >> WILL CERTAINLY IT BE SECURE TO BE AN ASSUMPTION THAT THEY WILL BE USING THIS SOFTWARE APPLICATION. >> > > YES, AND WE ARE IN INTERACTION WITH SEVERAL REGIONAL JURISDICTIONS AS WELL AS THE AREA AND ALSO THE LASTING STRATEGY CONCERNING RESPONSE AS WELL AS READINESS. SO THOSE DISCUSSIONS I WOULD EXPECT IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS TO BE MORE AS and concrete NEIL STATED IT'' S OUR OBJECTIVE TO HAVE A RESILIENT AS WELL AS INTER OPERABLE SYSTEM THROUGHOUT THE AREA.

>> > > MANY THANKS >>. > > OTHER QUESTIONS, COUNCIL? I HAD A FEW CARDS ON THESE ITEMS. GREG AND PETER TURNER. SPEAKER: THANKS. ON 12.1, I WILL CERTAINLY ALSO POSTPONE TO MISSPELLING OR MISPRONOUNCING THE NAME OF THE PROFESSIONAL. BUT WE DID SHOT TO GET IN TOUCH WITH THEM. THIS I A STATIONERY PLAN AS WELL AS AS YOU KNOW SANTA ROSA TOGETHER HAS ACTUALLY DEEPLY INCLUDED IN TRYING TO CONSTRUCT BASE UP PREPARATION FOR THE NEXT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE. WE REVIEWED THE STATION LOCATION PLAN AS WELL AS TO ESTABLISH WHAT SORT OF REAL ESTATE AND HOW HIGH TE REAL ESTATE NEED TO BE MIDTOWN AS WELL AS ESSENTIAL WITH THE PUBLIC INTERACTION AND SANTA ROSA ATTEMPTED TO DETERMINE HOW TO COMMUNITY– CONNECT WITH THEIR EXPERTS AS WELL AS I WASN'' T SIMPLE BUT WE FINALLY DETERMINED A MEANS TO COMMUNICATE BUT WE PLACE'' T HAD An ACTION. I DESIRE TO SAY THAT SANTA ROSA ASPIRES TO START A DURABLE DISCUSSION FOR THE TERMINAL LOCATION DOWNTOWN STRATEGY AS WELL AS WE HOPE THEY WILL SPEAK TO US. THANK YOU. >> > > THANKS, PETER TURNER? ADHERED TO BY ANITA– PUBLIC AUDIO SPEAKER: THANK YOU, IN RESOLVING 12.9 REGARDING THE LOCAL HOMELESS EMERGENCY SITUATION.

I PRESENT MOMENT BIND ALL CORRUPT ELUSIONS. I AM PETER, I AM AT THE HELM. DESCRIBE NOW WHY EXPERTS AE HOMELESS ESPECIALLY WITH THEIR HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS IN THE RAINFALL. TO THE GRANDE MEXICAN POPULATION, KNOW THAT ILLEGALS IN THE GOLDEN STATE AND MEXICO WERE WEASELED INTO OFFERING IN THE ARMED FORCE, BUT WHEN THEY ARE ELIMINATED, THEIR MEMBER OF THE FAMILY OBTAIN ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. THEY RECEIVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. MAYBE A LETTER. AND WHY ARE THESE HIGH RENTAL FEES TAKING PLACE? IT'' S SUPPLY AND ALSO NEED. YET BY WHOSE COMMAND, THE COMMAND OF THE INDIVIDUALS LENDERS. BENCH ASSOCIATION WITH THEIR 300,000 BAR LAWYERS IN THE GOLDEN STATE, THE SILICON VALLEY ELECTRONIC VIDEO GAMING MARKET. THAT IS WHAT IS CREATING THESE FABRICATED HIGH RENTS. THERE IS NO ANSWER WITHIN THE SYSTEM.AS I HAVE HIGHLIGHTED MANY TIMES, THESE INDIVIDUALS UP THERE ON THE DAIS EVEN IF THEY INTENDED TO THEY CANISTER ' T FIX THIS. THAT ' S WHY IT'' S AS MUCH AS INDIVIDUAL, IT ' S UP TO THE PROFESSIONALS, THE FAMILY MEMBERS MEMBERS, APPROXIMATELY OUR LABOR. IN SOME WAY, WE HAVE THIS STOCKHOLM DISORDER TROUBLED MOST. CONTINUE TO BE ANXIETY ICY AND END UP LIKE TOAST, LIKE A CANCER CELLS BE THE PROPHECY OF A 40-DAY STRIKE. LIKE A CHIMP SECURED IN A CAGE HIS WHOLE LIFE. HIS REALITY HAS BEEN REDUCED TO QUARREL. IN SOME CASES HE'' LL PROTEST THROWING FOODS AS WELL AS FECES, THE LENGTHIEST REQUISITION AFTER BEING CONDITIONED BY ENERGY A LOT TO MAKE SURE THAT EVEN WHEN SHOWN THE OPEN DOOR REFUSES TO GO OUT.

WHILE THE GROWN CHIMP AND LET United States APPREHENSION WHILE THE GROWN UP PRIMATES IS ABLE TO REST. THIS IS HOW WE END UP BEING THE CURE. FOR EFFECTIVE ANGELS HAVE ACTUALLY LISTENED TO THE REGULATING PHONE CALL BY THE SEA AS THEY HAVE REGULATED JOURNALISM WHO ARE GENUINELY HAD TAKING THE MASSACRE RESIDENCE AND ALSO INDUSTRY OF OIL. FOR THIS IS HOW CALIFORNIANS RISE. THE FAITHFUL RISE AS REAL YOUNGSTERS OF ISRAEL. WE ARE THE POWER, THE MOMENT IS AT HAND. COMPLY WITH YEE THIS COMMAND. THAT IS HOW ALL OF US RISE. >> > > THANKS. ANITA LAFAYETTE. SPEAKER: SORRY, I CAN'' T

SEE. I ' M NOT GOING TO INFORM YOU WHAT I DID THIS MID-DAY. I WAS SOAKING DAMP OUT IN THE RAINFALL TRYING TO HELP THESE HOMELESS POPLE. THEY HAVE NO PLACE TO GO. AND SO WE ARE NOT GOING TO BUILD OUR ESCAPE OF THIS, SO YOU CAN PUT AS MANY FUNDS THAT YOU WANT TO INTO HOUSING. I SAW A BUNCH OFF OF FULTON. THERE IS A GREAT DEAL OF HOUSING AROUND, A LT O HOMES, BUT THEY ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR PEOPLE TO USAGE. I WON'' T TELL YOU WHY. NOW, THE CDC LICENSED ANOTHER PERSON BRUSH UP OF THE TRAIL. IT WAS A HORRIFIC MOVE IN THIS POURING DOWN RAIN AND THE COPS WOULDN'' T EVEN LET TEM KEEP THERE SO THEY MADE THEM STROLL ON THE SIDEWALK OUT IN FRONT BECAUSE THEY COULDN'' T OBTAIN A RIDE OVER TO SAM JONES EVEN IF THEY WISHED TO MOST LIKELY TO SAM JONES.

OK, BECAUSE WE NEEDED TRUCKS TO TAKE THEIR DETAILS. THEY COULDN'' T LEAVE THEIR THINGS BEHIND. I IMPLY THAT'' S THE ONLY THINGS THEY HAVE. IS THERE NO MEANS TO EVER CHARM TO THE THOUGHTFUL HEART OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA SINCE I'' M REALLY DOUBTING IT. THE COPS WERE OBSCENE. THEY THREATENED TO APPREHENSION INDIVIDUALS AND ALSO THEY THREATENED TO APPREHENSION ME. CONTAINER YOU THINK THAT? BECAUSE I WAS STANDING IN FRONT OF THE STORE, THE BUCK TREE. I WAS STANDING IN FRONT WHICH PROTESTS THE LAW. DUE TO THE FACT THAT I WAS LOITERING. I WAS LOOKING TO AID INDIVIDUALS OBTAIN SOMEWHERE INSTEAD OF WANDER AROUND IN THE DOWNPOURING RIN. FOR HOW LONG CONTAINER A HUMAN BEING BEING LAST IN A DOWNPOURING RAINFALL? THAT'' S An EXCELLENT CONCERN BECAUSE YOU HAVEN ' T THOUGHT ABOUT IT. YOU ARE THE ONES THAT ACCEPTED THIS SWEEP, RGHT? AS WELL AS I'' M GOING TO MAKE An INDIVIDUAL GRIEVANCE TO THE POLICE DIVISION SINCE I DON'' T THINK IT WAS LAWFUL FOR TEM TO ENDANGER ME WITH ARREST.I DON ' T THINK THAT ' S EVEN HUMAN BEING WHEN I ' M TRYING TO HELP THE HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS LOCATE A PLACE FOR SHELTER. SURE THE HOST TEAM WAS AVAILABLE. YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY STATED, THERE IS NO ROOM AT SAM JONES. THEY INFORMED ME THAT. WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO GO. NO PERSON IS LISTENING. INFORM ME TO BE QUIET. > > PAT NICHOLSON. >> > > SO I WAS ALSO AT THAT LOCATION TODAY AND ALSO I WAS TOLD MY PRESENCE WAS TRESPASSING. ALTHOUGH IF THAT'' S TRUE, THEN, I ' M GOOD, I ' M GOOD. IF THAT'' S REAL AS WELL AS I WAS TRESPASSING I ' M AT A CRIMINAL ACTIVITY SCENE. THE ONLY POINT I WAS DOING WAS STANDING THERE AND SPEAKING WITH THE COPS THAT WERE THERE.THAT WAS THE TOTALITY OF THE HAZARD I OFFERED AT THAT TIME AND I WAS TOLD THAT I WAS ESCORTED FROM THE AREA WHERE I WAS. I WAS TOLD THAT I WAS TRESPASSING AS WELL AS I NEEDED TO LEAVE. I'' M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHY. IS IT BECAUSE THERE ARE HOMELESS THERE AS WELL AS IT'' S CURRENTLY OFF BOUNDARY TO United States, INDIVIDUAL WHO LIVE THERE TILL THE GROWTH STARTS. SINCE WE ARE NO LONGER ALLOWED ACCESS, all THERE IS GOING TO BE AT THE FENCING. I RECOMMEND THAT THE CURRENT PLAN YOU PEOPLE ADHERE TO WORRYING THE HOMELESS DOESN'' T FUNCTION. THAT EVERYONE SEEMS TO SHED BEHIND IT, AND ALSO IT WOULD BE A LOT BETTER IF EVERYBODY COULD CONSIDER A MANNER IN WHICH MOST OF US WIN BEHIND IT, AND ALSO INSTEAD OF US TELLING YU PLEASE DO SOMETHING TO MODIFICATION THIS, WE CANISTER GO, THANKS. YOU TRANSFORMED THIS, AS WELL AS IT'' S BETTER AND WE ARE REALLY GLAD YOU DID THAT. ECAUSE WHAT YOU ARE DOING CURRENTLY DOESN'' T SEEM TO HAVE THAT RING TO IT. AND ALSO MAYBE I ' M RIGHT DUE TO THE FACT THAT I HAVE BEEN UP BELOW PRIOR TO A TOLD YOU DETAILS AND I WAS RIGHT ABOUT THEM ADVERTISEMENT YOU DIDN'' T LISTEN TO AT THE TIME AND AFTER THAT YOU CLAIMED, YEAH, I WAS RIGHT.IT IS POSSIBLE

PERHAPS THAT THIS COMES THAT YOU PRESENTLY PURSUE COULD BE ALTERED FOR THE BETTER AND INSTEAD OF US BEING UP SATISFIED WITH THINGS, WE CANISTER ADJUSTMENT THE WHOLE PICTURE SINCE I THINK IT'' S POSSIBLE. IT ' S BEEN DONE AND BEING DONE. WE ARE NOT CURRENTLY DOING IT BUT WE COULD, AND MAYBE SOMEONE ELSE WOULD LIKE MY HALF MIN THAT'' S. THAT ' S ALL >>I REALLY HAVE TO SAY. > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: THANKS, THOMAS ALS. PUBLIC SPEAKER: THANKS FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK AND I A LOT HOPE YOU DO PASS THESE RESOLUTIONS FOR THE LOCAL EMERGENCY FOR THE FIRE AS WELL AS REGIONAL EMERGENCY FOR HOMELESS EMERGENCY. I WAS JUST IN PARADISE, ATTEMPTED TO GET AS CLOSE AS I COULD. PARADISE, IN BUTTE AREA DOWN IN CHICO AND SOME THAT ASSOCIATE WITH BOTH OF THESE DETAILS, HOMELESS EMERGENCY CLINIC AND ALSO FIRE EMERGENCY SITUATION. I SAW WHERE THE FIRE WENT, WHERE THERE WAS BURNED AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN SINCE.

THE TREES HAVE BEEN KNOCKED DOWN, LOWER, SAWED DOWN. THOSE TREES DIDN'' T BURN. THERE WERE LOTS OF GREENERY ON THOSE TREES, THERE WAS MANZANITA THAT DIDN'' T BURN AS WELL AS DEAD TREES THAT DIDN ' T BURN. I PUT ON ' T MEAN MISSED BY THE FIRE, THEY WERE SCORCHED BY THE FIRE. EVEN THESE TREES THAT HAD GREENERY THE BARK BURNED. THE BARK BURNED AND THIS APPEARS LIKE IT GOT ON FIRE AND ALSO THE TREE HEADS OUT. THAT'' S WHAT WE NEED FOR THE FIRE. WE NEED THE FIRE TO GO OUT ON THE TREES. WE SIMPLY DON'' T WANT IT TO IMPACT AROUND LIKE IT WAS. THESE TREES ARE NOT DEAD AND ALSO NOT PERISHING, THEY ARE GOING TO LIVE. I SAW MANZANITA PLANTS THAT WOULD BECOME A ROMAN CANDLE LIGHT AND ALSO DID NOT MELT. DESPITE THE FACT THAT THEY WERE SCORCHED. WE HAVE A LOCAL FIRE EMERGENCY SITUATION WITH THE HOUSING AND THIS PROVIDES YOUR HOUSE WITH THE HOMELESS. WE HAD THE COUNT IN 2014 OF 20,000 INDIVIDUALS COUCH SURFING AND 10-11,000 ARE AS A RESULT OF THE FIRE AD THEY GET ON THE VERGE OF HOMELESS AS YOU RECOGNIZE.

I EXISTED AS WELL AS THEY ARE FOCUSING THE PEOPLE FROM GRIDLY TO BE MOVED TO THE FAIRGROUNDS. AS MENTIONED BY MS. NICHOLSON, YOU HAD THE RECORD THAT PERHAPS THIS HOMELESS PLAN ISN'' T WORKING SO EXCELLENT AND ALSO I WEAR'' T THINK THAT WAS ON THE MINDS OF INDIVIDUAL WHO HEADED OUT TO ROSELAND AND ALSO THE COAST, BUT THEY EXISTED AND THEY WERE EVICTED TODAY IN THE RAINFALL AND ALSO THERE DOESN'' T SEEM TO BE I A LOT OF REASON TO ACCOMPLISH THAT. THERE IS NO FUNCTION GOING ON, THERE IS NO PREPARATION FOR ANYTHING. THANKS. >> > > THANK YOU, GEORGE? PUBLIC SPEAKER: HOW ARE YOU? I HAVE OBSERVED A WHOLE LOT OF EX-ASPIRATION– OF THE WORK THAT REQUIRES TO BE DONE AND WE UNDERSTAND THE RIGHT THING TO PERFORM AS WELL AS YOU KNOW THAT AS WELL AS YOU ARE REFRAINING FROM DOING IT.

I BELIEVE WE ARE BAFFLED CONCERNING HOW WE CANISTER MAKE YOU DO IT, BUT NOT ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT IT NEEDS TO BE DONE. HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED An AREA TO GO. WE DON'' T GIVE IT TO THEM, WE ARE KILLING THEM. YOU DECLARE A STATE OF EMERGENCY AND ENFORCE THIS PRESENT FOR 2 YEARS. ENFORCING A STATE OF EMERGENCY SITUATION, YOU ARE KILLING SOMEONE. YOU ARE HOLDING A PERSON UNDERWATER. I WISH TO LISTEN TO THE REPORT, IT'' S CALLED THE VOICE OF THE VOICELESS RECORD. I DON'' T WANT TELL YOU SOMETHING YOU CURRENTLY DO KNOW BUT YOU NEED TO KNOW. IT'' S DISCRIMINATORY AS WELL AS HOMELESS INCARCERATION. HOMELESS ROUTINELY OBTAIN CITATIONS FOR MINOR OFFENSES SUCH AS DRINKING IN PUBLIC. WHAT HOMELESS IS UNABLE TO PAY A FINE, THEY BECOME A SUBJECT TO WARRANT. LOTS ARE HOMELESS AS WELL AS THESE ARE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE PROBATION. THIS COMPRISES VICIOUS AND DEGRATING TREATMENT IN THE ARTICLE 9. THE RESOLUTION CALLS FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF A RISK-FREE OUTDOOR CAMPING LOCATION.

THE SONOMA COUNTY PHASE OF THE ACLU STATES THAT HOMELESSNESS IN SONOMA COUNTY IS A SIGNIFICANT CATASTROPHE. THAT REPRESSIVE ACTIONS VERSUS HOMELESS ARE PROCEEDING AND SECURE CAMPING, CAR PARKING AND ALSO FACILITY WITH SMALL SANCTUARIES, NO RISK-FREE PARKING AND ALSO SECURE OUTDOOR CAMPING I CURRENTLY ON THE AGENDA FOR CITY OFFICIALS. THANK YOU. DEAL WITH YOURSELF. SPEAKER: TODAY, PETE, THOSE SEEKING POLITICAL ASYLUM FOR HIDEOUS CONDITIONS THAT WE HAVE CREATED ARE BEING BRUTALLY STRUCK. SOME OF THEM GET ON OUR SOUTHERN BORDER, SOME OF THEM UNDER OUR NOSES IN THE SOUTHWESTERN EDGE OF SANTA ROSA. AS GEORGE JUST EXPLAINED, THAT'' S TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION IN HUMAN THERAPY THERAPY.

> > ONCE MORE, MR. TIBBETS, IF WE CONTAINER PUT THIS ON A CUNCIL SCHEDULE, WE CONTAINER GET STAFF INPUT ON THIS AND WE CONTAINER HAVE A ROBUST DISCUSSION AT COUNCIL LEVEL. > > YES, PRODUCT 12.1. > > THAT IS NOT WHAT IS IN OUR DESCRIPTION OF THE PROGRAM. > > YES. > > YES, AND WE ARE IN INTERACTION WITH SEVERAL REGIONAL JURISDICTIONS AS WELL AS THE AREA AND THE LONG-LASTING STRATEGY REGARDING REACTION AND ALSO READINESS.IT'' S CRUEL AS WELL AS UNCOMMON. THAT'' S BEEN DETERMINED BY THE UN, IT ' S BEEN DETERMINED BY OUR OWN COMMISSION FOR HUMAN CIVIL LIBERTIES BELOW IN SONOMA COUNTY. RESIDENT, NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN LEGAL RIGHTS COMPANIES, HAVE CALLED IT IN PERSON. THE REPORT YOU SIMPLY GOT FROM YOUR EXTREMELY OWN POLICE AUDITOR HIGHLY INDICATES THIS IS IN PERSON AS WELL AS THINGS OUT REALLY PLAINLY THAT IT'' S INEFFECTIVE.

OUT BELOW IN THIS RAIN, PEOPLE ARE INTIMIDATED WITH ARREST WHO ARE SCATTERED AGAIN FOR LOOKING FOR ASYLUM WHEN YOU PROVIDE NO SUFFICIENT ALTERNATIVE THAT PROTECTS INDIVIDUALS'' S SELF-RESPECT AND ALSO THEIR FREEDOM COMPARED TO SURVIVING THE ROADS. THIS IS TERRIBLE. AND ALSO YOU ARE HAPPENING WITH BUSINESS CUSTOMARILY AS INDIVIDUALS ARE BEING ABUSED. BEFORE YOU AIM THE FINISHING– FINGER AT THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, YOU SUPPLY YOUR POLICE FOR THIS SERVICE. YOU PUT ON'' T HAVE TO. IT'' S UNCONSTITUTIONAL, IT ' S IN HUMAN, AND STRONG PRIORITY HAS BEEN COLLECTION THEY ARE JUST ADHERING TO ORDERS. MULTIPLY– MUCH OF THIS IS ON THEM AS WELL WHEN DOING SO IS ABUSIVE, IN HUMAN, UNCONSTITUTIONAL: AND GOES AGAINST HUMAN CIVIL LIBERTIES IS NOT AN REASON. DO BETTER. >> > > KATHERINE FINNEGAN. SPEAKER: EXCELLENT AFTERNOON, EVERY PERSON. I DON'' T HAVE ANY PREPARED COMMENTS, BUT I DO NOT TO MENTION THAT REALLY NOW I'' M REALLY FEELING LOWER THAN A SERPENT IN A WAGON TRACK. THAT'' S FROM A TRACK. THE FACTOR THAT HAS TO DO WITH WHAT ' S HAPPENING IN MY HOME TOWN NOW.

SO THERE ARE TWO THINGS THAT ARE DISTURBING TO ME. ONE IS WHEN BOB ROBINSON MADE HS REPORT TO YOUR ANNOYANCE, I DON'' T RECALL THAT EITHER AMONG YOU SAID SOMETHING ABOUT, WELL, WE MAY NOT AGREE WITH YOU REGARDING OUR EVALUATION, ABOUT OUR PLAN, BUT WE ARE CONCERNED REGARDING COPS MORALE. I DID NOT LEARN THROUGH EITHER ONE OF YOU CONCERNING THIS WORRY. THE SECONDLY IS HAVING TO DO WITH THE EVICTION TAKING AREA TODAY IN THE DRIVING RAINFALL. I WAS THERE VIEWING PEOPLE WITH NO RAIN GEAR, NOT EVEN A COAT, SOAKING DAMP IN THE DRIVING RAIN TRYING TO PACK UP THEIR TENTS, AS WELL AS I WANT TO KNOW FW– IF THERE IS ANY REASON ON GOD'' S PLANET WHY THIS COULDN ' T HAVE WAITED ON A COUPLE DAYS. PLEASE, YOU ARE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THIS. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE AND I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO DO ABOUT IT.

THANKS. >>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: THANK YOU, BACK TO THE COUNCIL. IN THE ABSENCE OF VICE-MAYOR ROGERS, I WILL CERTAINLY MOVE PRODUCTS 12.1 THROUGH 12.9 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THING 12.3. >> > > SECONDLY >>. > > YOUR BALLOTS ON 12.1 VIA 12.9 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF 12.3. SORRY. I WAS LATE ON THAT PARTICULAR. CONTAINER YOU RESET. THOSE THINGS PASS 6-0. RELOCATE THING 12.3. >> > > CONTAINER WE SPARATE 12.3 SO IT INCLUDES EVERYTHING OTHER THAN THE DOUBLE STRIKES. THE OTHERS ARE PENALTY. IT'' S THE DUAL PUNCHES PROGRAM THAT I WOULD LOVE TO VOTE SEPARATE ON. IT ' S THE ONE WITH THE– IT ' S IN THE EVEN MORE DETAILED REPORT AND NOT IN THE PRESENTATION. THERE IS A CHART OF THE OTHER ITEMS. O.K.. SORRY ABOUT THAT. >> I THINK WE ARE LOOKING IF WE CAN DO THAT. > > YES, YOU CAN BALLOT TO OMIT THAT HONOR FOR THE REDEMPTION MILITARY DOUBLE PUNCHES IF YOU SO

>> WISH. > > I WOULD ASK THAT YOU TAKE >> THAT ONE OUT. > > DO YOU DESIRED TO SUGGEST AN CHANGE TO MY ACTIVITY? > > THE CHANGE I ' M SUGGESTING IS THAT YOU INITIALLY MOVE 12.3 WITH ALL THE PRODUCTS INCLUDED EXCEPT THE DOUBLE >> PUNCHES THING. > > IS THERE A SECONDLY FOR THAT? I ' M NT SURE I LISTEN TO A SECOND. I WILL CERTAINLY ACCEPT YOUR CHANGE TO MY ACTIVITY. IS THERE A SECONDLY TO THAT? I'' M NOT LISTENING TO A SECONDLY >>. > > DOUBLE PUNCHES, COULD WE MAKE THE MODIFICATION TO ENSURE THAT WE APPROVE THE COMPLETE PACKAGE AND ALSO MAKE OUR FNDS CONDITIONAL IN DOUBLE PUNCHES ON THOSE UNDER 14 YEARS OF AGE, DON'' T DO HEAD COMPETING >>? > > I APPRECIATE THAT THERE IS A HOMEWORK RESEARCH PROGRAM IN ADDITION TO THE BOXING PROGRAM. MAKE CLEAR FOR ME THE AMOUNT OF YOUNGSTERS PUT ON'' T BOX OR SPAR, BUT ONLY DO THE HOMEWORK? > > ANY PERSON THAT ' S 14 AND UNDER DOES NOT HAVE ANY KIND OF HEAD CALL. THAT'' S MONEYED BY MEASURE O FUNDING. >> > I UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE NOT MONEYING IT. WE ARE FINANCING THE AFTER INSTITUTION STUDY ITEM OF THIS.

BUT THEY STILL IN ORDER TO DO THE AFTER SCHOOL PIECE OF THIS, PARTICIPATE IN THE BOXING PROGRAM. >> > > NO, THEY ARE SEPARATE. >> > > THEY ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT AS WELL AS YOU TIN BE IN ONE PROGRAM WITHOUT THE OTHER PROGRAM? >> > > CORRECT. >> > > AND THE AMOUNT OF YOUNGSTERS DO THAT? >> > > I WEAR ' T HAVE THAT RESPONSE, BUT I CAN GET THAT FOR YOU. >> > > OK, IWOULD LIKE THAT SOLUTION. I HAVE ACTUALLY EXPRESSED THIS CONCERN CONCERNING SUPPORTING A PROGRAM OF YOUNGSTERS UNDERAGE 14 CAN RECEIVE A HEAD INJURY BY SPARRING AND WE HAVE NOT HAD COLLABORATION BY THIS GROUP TO STOP SPARRING BY THIS AGE. THE PEDIATRIC MEDICINE ASSOCIATION PHRASE THAT YOUNGSTERS UNDER 14 NEED TO NOT BE SPARRING. I RECOGNIZE THERE IS WONDERFUL RELATIONSHIP AND ALSO FRIENDSHIP AS WELL AS GREAT OUTCOMES UNDER THIS PROGRAM, BUT THOSE END RESULTS ARE MITIGATED BY THOSE THAT DEVELOP INJURY CHANCES THAT WE MUST NOT BE FUNDING.I UNDERSTAND THAT IN SOME WAY WE HAVE FIGURED HOW TO FUND THE PROGRAM SO THERE IS SOME SEPARATION OF THE FUNDS. IT FEELS INCORRECT TO ME. I ' M SORRY. IF WE CAN'' T DIFFERENT THAT, I ' M STILL GOING TO NEED TO VOTE NO>. > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: ALL RIGHT. I DIDN'' T HEAR ANY SUPPORT FOR SEPARATING IT OUT >>.'> > I ' M PLEASED TO SEPARATE IT OUT SO THEY– SHE CONTAINER TAKE A BALLOT OF RESISTANCE. I WILL CERTAINLY OFFER A 2ND FOR THAT. >> > > MANY THANKS >>. > > THAT WAS THE ACTIVITY THAT AT FIRST DIDN'' T HAVE A SECOND NOW IT HAS A SECOND. YOUR BALLOTS, PLEASE. > > CANISTER YOU SIMPLY CLEAR UP WHAT THE MOVEMENT IS >>. >> > > PLEASE. > > WE ARE BALLOT O THE SELECTION GIVE ITEM. ALL OF THE SELECTION GRANTS EXCEPT FOR THE REDEMPTION MILITARY GRANT IN THIS VOTE. >> > >'WE ' LL DO THE REDEMPTION IN >> THE NEXT ROUND. > > CAN WE COVER THIS IN THIS ACTIVITY>? > > YOU DEFINITELY ARE WELCOME TO PERFORM THAT. >> > > FURTHER CLARIFICATION? >> > > WHAT'I ' M SECONDING TO BE CLEAR IS GVING JLIE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PULL 12.3 OUT OF THE CONSENT SCHEDULE AS WELL AS OPPOSE IT MUST SHE CHOOSE IT.

>> > > WE ALREADY DID THAT. I'' M ASKING THAT WE ALLOW ME TO VOTE IN SUPPORT OF THE VARIOUS OTHER PRODUCTS THAT ARE GOING AHEAD UNDER 12.3 BECAUSE THERE ARE A COLLECTIONS OF ITEMS GOING ONWARD. TO MAKE SURE THAT WE JUST PULL DUAL PUNCHES. >> > > OKAY, I APOLOGIZE THE COUNCIL FOR COMPLICATING DETAILS BUT I DO BELIEVE JULIE HAS A RIGHT TO ELECT THESE SERVICES. >> > > ACTIVITY IS TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE EXEMPTION OF THE REDEMPTION ARMY GIVE. YOUR VOTES PLEASE. >> > > THANKS. THAT PASSES 5-1 WITH MR. SCHWEDHELM OPPOSED. NOW I'' M GOING TO MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE SALVATION MILITARY OPTION GIVE. >> > > SCOND. >> > > YOUR BALLOTS, PLEASE. WHICH PASSES 5-1 WITH MS. COMBS AGAINST IT. >> > > THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN. >> > > PROCEEDING TO PUBLIC TALK ABOUT ITEMS THAT ARE NOT ON TONIGHT'' S AGENDA. GREGORY FURAN COMPLIED WITH BY PETER TURNER. PETER TURNER COMPLIED WITH BY MILES BURGUNDY. PUBLIC AUDIO SPEAKER: I WAS NEVER A BIG FOLLOWER OF THE ROLLING ROCKS, BUT I SUCH AS THAT A PERSON PART WHERE HE CLAIMED, AFTER ALL THAT KLLED THE KENNEDIES.

IT WAS YOU AS WELL AS ME. SIMPLY ABOVE THE COMPREHENSION OF WHAT THAT SUGGESTS TO ME AS WELL AS YOU. WE MET THE POWER– POGO THAT CLAIMS WE MET THE opponent as well as the adversary I YOU AND ALSO US. ALL SMALL THE CONSTITUTION WHERE THE POWER LIVES AS WELL AS THE CONSTITUTION WILL NEVER BE THE UNWRITTEN LAW AS WELL AS YET IT'' S A STUNNING DOCUMENT TALENTED BY A MAY MATRIARCHAL SOCIETY. YOU WHETHER OR NT YOU ARE ONE OF THE MOST EFFECTIVE, YOU SPECIFICALLY THE FAITHFUL AMONGST YOU FREE YOURSELF OF ALL ORGANIZATION OF A SYSTEM.

HUMAN FREEDOM WILL BE GRANTED AFTER YOU FREE THOSE WHO CONTAINER NOT FREE THEMSELVES, THE planet and the pet. SPIRITUALS AUTUMN MORE THAN THEIR PERCEPTION. APPARENTLY POLICE KNOWS THIS. AS WE FIRSTLY SHOWED WE CARED. POLICE OFFICERS MEANT BACKWARDS IS SPOCH. SPIRITUAL CONFUSION. THEY ABIDE BY SPIRITUAL LAW. WHEN YOU GRUMBLE ABOUT THEM, KNOW THIS, POLICE ABIDES BY THE VERY SYSTEM THAT THE SORTS OF YOU WHINE ALL FINANCIALLY SUPPORTING BY SUPPORTING THE FLUSH INDUSTRY, THE VERY SAME PHONE MARKET, THE COMPUTER SYSTEM SECTOR. GO AHEAD, KEEP DOING AS YOU ARE DOING AS WELL AS YOU WILL CERTAINLY CONTINUE GETTING WHAT YOU ARE GETTING. YOU HAVE THE CHOICE TO ABIDE BY SPIRITUAL LAW. I AM PETER AS WELL AS I AM HECK BENT AS WELL AS PARADISE SENT. TO THE POWER OF THE KINGDOM TO REJECT ME, REFUTE YOURSELF AS WELL AS THEREFORE DENYING THE LIVING LORD, THE ONLY AUTHORITY THAT LAYS DOWN THE SWORD OF THE U.S.MLITARY TO THE HOMELESS ENDURE THAT MASSACRE HOUSEBOUND WOULD GREATFULLY PROFESSION An AREA WITH YOU. THOSE WE UNDERSTAND THAT THOSE (1) 400-0000 MURDERS A DAY. THAT'' S BEEN 2-3 MINS ALREADY. NO CHANCE. THE BASE LINE TO THOSE THAT ARE REMOVED TO BUYING OF SERVANT LABOR. THANKS. MILES, BERGMAN. >> > > [INDISTINCT]>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: MR. BERGMAN, PLEASE SIT DWN. MILESBERGAN, MICROPHONE. SPEAKER: EXCELLENT NIGHT, MR. MAYOR AND ALSO COUNCIL, MY NAME I MILESBERG AN, I LIVE IN SANTA ROSA. EARLIER THERE WAS A RECORD ENTITLED THE STATE OF SANTA ROSA. CURRENTLY IN OUR COUNTY, ONE IN FOUR PEOPLE RESIDE IN HARDSHIP. IN THE LAST 40 YEARS, REAL SALARY FOR THE BOTTOM 20% OF THE WAGE INCOME EARNERS DROPPED TO GREATER THAN 40%.

WAGE EARNERS EVERY ONE OF THE WAGE GROWTH HAS GONE TO THE TOP 10% OF THE EARNERS. THIS IS EXPECTED TO GET WORSE. 75% OF THE PREDICTED WORK GROWTH OVER SONOMA COUNTY OVER THE NEXT 20 YEARS IS EXPECTED TO PAY LESS THAN $20 AN HR, THIS IS WHEN A FAMILY OF FOUR IN A COUNTY NECESSITY HAVE BOTH MOMS AND DADS FUNCTIONING FULL-TIME TO BE ABLE TO AFFORD THE FUNDAMENTAL REQUIREMENTS. WHAT CANISTER WE DO ABOUT THIS EXISTENTIAL DILEMMA IN EARNINGS INEQUALITY. SIMILAR TO THE NEEDS OF DECREASING PRICE IN HEALTHCARE AND ALSO ONE EVEN MORE WHICH IS FOCUSING ON SMALL BUSINESSES. SMALL BUSINESSES HAVE A SUBSTANTIAL FAVORABLE EFFECT ON OUR RESIDENT ECONOMIC CLIMATE. IN OUR LAST WEEKEND, THE MAYOR SHOWED A GRAPHIC ON FACEBOOK REVEALS THAT $100 ACQUISITION ON AMAZON.COM WOULD ON– ONLY WEB United States $1. AT THE SAME TIME THESE BIG BOX SHOP PROFIT FROM THESE INCOME WHILE DRIVING OUT LOCAL BUSINESSES. MY QUESTION IS THIS VILLAGE SERVICE BETTER TO United States, WHY DO WE HAVE A FLAT COMPANY TAX OBLIGATION, AND ALSO WHY DO WE ALOW CORPORATIONS TO DODGE ALL TAXES ON THEIR REVENUE I BELIEVE THIS IS BACKWARDS AS WELL AS I URGE THE COUNCIL TO FEE THE TAX OBLIGATION PRICES AND 2, ELIMINATING OPTIMUM OR GENERAL BUSINESS TAX OBLIGATION AND ALSO THREE, ELEVATING THE LEVEL FROM WHICH TAX BEGINS AT $25,000 FOR INCOMES AS WELL AS FUND PROGRAMS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES AND FOSTER ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS WELL AS HANDLE THE MUCH NEEDED RISE IN BASE PAY.

IF WE ARE EVER BEFORE GOING TO GENUINELY ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF REVENUE INEQUALITY AND ALSO MASS DISTURBANCE OF RICHES FROM OUR AREA, WE NECESSITY BUILD PATHWAYS OUT OF POVERTY AS WELL AS NECESSITY FIND An IMPLIES FROM WORKER TO EMPLOYER. WE NEED TO SUPPORT THOSE WHO DO THE RIGHT THINGS BY THEIR EMPLOYEES BUT CAN'' T AFFORD TO. MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, WE DEMAND A SERVICE TAX OBLIGATION. THANK YOU SIGNIFICANTLY. >>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: MIKE TURNER, FOLLOWED BY BOB HANSEN. SPEAKER: EXCELLENT MID-DAY, COUNCIL MEMBERS, MIKE TO THE MOST EFFECTIVE URJEN. GOOD FRIENDS OF THE CLIMATE ACTION STRATEGY. I CAME TO MAKE COMMENTS OF THE RESEARCH STUDY SESSION IN WHICH WE GOT TO CHECK OUT AN STATUTE FOR ALL ELECTRIC READY CONSTRUCTION, AND MY GENERAL ASSUMPTION WAS THAT WE WOULD BE LOOKING FOR A WAY TO COME TO SOME RESOLUTION ABOUT THIS IN A TIMELY WAY. SO, I COME. THAT STUDY SESSION WAS OCTOBER 23RD, AS WELL AS GIVEN THAT THEN WE HAVE HAD THE HORRIFIC FIRES IN HEAVEN. SO, I GUESS I'' M A LITTLE BIT BAFFLED. THE REPORT PRODUCT IT LOOKS LIKE IT OBTAINED PUSHED TO FEBRUARY 26TH WHICH IS 4 MONTHS AWAY, AS WELL AS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE NEW ENVIRONMENT STUDY THAT CAME TO LIGHT IN THE LAST FEW DAYS, IT JUST SEEMS THAT A LOW HANGING FRUIT SORT OF PROCEDURE SUCH AS THIS IS THE LEAST THAT WE WOULD EVER ASK OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA TO SUPPLY A FEW WIRES THAT COULD PREVENT INDIVIDUALS FROM HAVEN'' T TO INVEST THOUSANDS, PROBABLY LATER WHEN THEY NEED TO RETROFIT THEIR HOMES WHEN THE GOLDEN STATE NEEDS TO GO TO ALL ELECTRIC RESIDENCES.

IT SEEMS CONSIDERING THAT WE HAVE A FEELING THAT THERE IS A GREAT DEAL OF MOMENTUM TO GET THINGS DONE. I'' M NOT HAPPENING CONTENTIOUS. I APOLOGIZE IF IT APPEARS THIS WAY. I'' M ASKING IF YOU CAN STEP THINGS UP. DESPITE THE FACT THAT IT ' S ON INDIVIDUALS ' S MIND AND PEOPLE WEAR ' T HAVE WORDS TO EXPRESS ABOUT THEIR ANXIETY ABOUT THE CLIMATE PROCEDURES AND ALSO WHAT WE ' LL BE TAKING CARE OF. THANKS FOR LISTENING TO ME OUT AND ALSO I VALUE FUNCTIONING WITH ALL OF US. I'' M JUST COMING OUT OF A LITTLE BIT OF DISAPPOINTMENT. THANK YOU. PUBLIC SPEAKER: GREAT EVENING, EVERYONE. MY NAME IS ROBERT HANSON.

FR ME, I I'' M FAMILIAR WITH An ISSUE, I'DON ' T ADDRESS THAT TROUBLE. I ' M AS GUILTY AS THE ANNOYING CELEBRATIONS. WE HAVE A TROUBLE IN SONOMA COUNTY, MARIN AREA AS WELL AS I SUSPECT EVERY AREA IN THE STATE OF THE GOLDEN STATE AND ALSO THAT ' S OUT FAMILY MEMBERS COURT SYSTEM. THIS IS A COURT SYSTEM WHERE OUR CHILDREN UNDER 14 HAVE NO LEGAL RIGHTS. OUR GRANDPARENTS HAVE NO LEGAL CIVIL LIBERTIES. ACROSS OUR NATION GRANDPARENTS ARE OFFERED IN THE FINANCIAL FOR OUR YOUNGSTERS. THEY ARE GIVING THE ETHICAL CLARITY GOT VIA EXPERIENCE FOR OUR GRANDPARENTS, FOR OUR GRAND KIDS. IN A WORLD GONE RIDICULOUS, MORAL CLEARNESS IS NECESSARY FOR OUR GRAND CHILDREN. I MATURED IN A WORLD WHERE THERE WAS NO HOMELESS. THE HOMELESS WE HAD IN OUR COUNTRY WERE HOBOS AND ALSO THEY SELECTED THAT. NOW, OUR FAMILY MEMBERS COURT STATE FAMILY COURT SYSTEM IS ABDUCTING OUR KIDS. I HAVE OBTAINED AN 11-YEAR-OLD GRANDDAUGHTER, SADDIE ROSE. FOR THE FIRST YEARS OF HER LIFE, HER FATHER HAD NO CALL WITH HER. AFTER A YEAR 1/2 OF COURT GUARDIANSHIP WITH HER DADDY, SHE REJECTED ANY PROTECTION WITH THIS MAN. CONSUMING ALCOHOL AND ALSO SPOUSAL MISUSE AND ALSO CHILD ABUSE PLEASE THE NO GET IN TOUCH WITH. AFTER REUNIFICATION SPECIALIST, THAT'' S TE NAME IN THIS VIDEO GAME IN THE FAMILY COURT SYSTEM.

THEY COULD NOT BREAK THE SPIRIT OF MY GRANDDAUGHTER. SHE DECLINED ANY CALL WITH THIS GUY. MY DAUGHTER MISSED OUT ON A COURT DATE AUGUST 15TH, I WAS IN THE VA HOSPITAL. COURT ROBERT ORDERED A 90-DAY SAFEKEEPING COUPLED WHAT 90-DAY COMMUNICATIONS BLOCK ON AN 11-YEAR-OLD LITTLE GIRL. NO COMMUNICATION BETWEEN HER HOUSEHOLD, HER GOOD FRIENDS, THAT ORDER WAS REPROVED NOVEMBER 15TH, ANOTHER 90-DAY CUSTODIANSHIP. NO COMMUNICATION BLOCKED ON AN 11-YEAR-OLD WOMAN. WHAT TYPE OF MAN DOES THAT TO AN 11-YEAR-OLD LADY? JUDGE ROBERT BOYD DID. AS I SAT BEFORE COURT BOYD OCTOBER 3RD AND ALSO HE REFUTED MY DEMAND FOR GRANDPA VISITATION. I CHECKED OUT THE MALE AND ALSO THERE WAS NOBODY THERE. NO ONE RESIDENCE. >> > > MR. HANSON, YOU HAVE TO COVER IT UP.I ' M SORRY FOR YOUR PROBLEMS. >> > > THOSE ARE NOT MY DIFFICULTIES, THEY ARE YOUR PROBLEMS. OUR CHILDREN ARE BEING ABDUCTED. SPEAKER: GOOD NIGHT, EVERYONE. I HAVE SPENT THE LAST PAIR OF DAYS SEEING AS WELL AS SUSTAINING A TEAM OF HOMELESS PEOPLE, A NUMBER OF THEM ELDERLY, LOTS OF OF THEM SICKNESS THAT COLLABORATED TO HELP EACH OTHER SURVIVE KNOWING THAT THE RAIN WAS UPCOMING, HAVING BEEN MVED UP HOME BY THE CHP THAT THEY HAVE BEEN CAMPED ON, A BLOCK OF THEM. THEY HAD IT AS WELL AS THEY STATED WE REQUIREMENT SOMETHING DIFFERENT. THEY RETURNED TO BUILDING THAT LAGGED THE DOLLAR STORE AS WELL AS STARTED CALLING United States TO SAY CAN YOU HELP United States, WE ARE HERE. IT'' S BEEN A REAL FACT CHECK TO SEE WHAT KIND OF TORMENT INDIVIDUALS ARE NEEDING TO RESIDE IN DUE TO OUR POLICIES AS WELL AS OUR PASSIVITY. AS WELL AS I RESOLVE COMING BELOW EVEN THOUGH I'' M A BIT EXHAUSTED TO SAY THAT I DESIRED TO STAND WITH BOB AARONSON AND ALSO I INTENDED TO APPLAUD BOB AARONSON. AS AN INDEPENDENT POLICE AUDITOR, HE DID WHAT WE DESIRED POLICE AUDITOR'' S TO DO.HE TOLD US HOW HE SAW IT. HE HAD THE DIGESTIVE TRACTS AS WELL AS HE HAD THE NERVES, AND ALSO THAT IS WHAT WE WANT. YOU MAY DISAGREE WITH A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENT POINT OF VIEWS. I HEARD ONE SAY, THIS POLICY IS NOT WORKING AND 2, IT'' S BAD FOR SPIRITS ON THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY BUT YOU MAY NOT AGREE WITH THAT. I REALLY THINK YOU REQUIRED TO ASSISTANCE A PERSON WHO IS WILLING TO TELL THE TRUTH HOW HE SEE'' S IT ABOUT POLICE IN THIS AREA IN THIS CITY. IT ' S CRITICAL FOR EVERYBODY. I WISH TO SUPPORT THE EXPANSION OF THE PROHIBITION ON SERVICE REAL ESTATE PRICE GOUGING. BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY THIS INFLUENCES HOMELESSNESS ON EVERY DEGREE, AND I WANT TO WELCOME YOU ALL TO AN OCCASION SATURDAY FROM 1-3 IN THIS CHAMBER WHICH COUNCILWOMAN JULIE COMBS HAS SPONSORED AS WELL AS THIS IS GOING TO BE A LITTLE BIT OF AN UP BEAT THING DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE HAVE ABOUT $4 MILLION UPCOMING TO THE CITY ON A STATE FUND.THE STATE

HAS ACTUALLY REALLY REASONABLY STATED THERE IS REAL ESTATE CRISIS. WE ARE GOING TO THROW CASH RIGHT INTO THE CITIES AND THE REGIONS AND ALSO YOU ALL DETERMINE THE VERY BEST METHOD TO LOOK AFTER THIS DILEMMA FOR YOUR COMMUNITIES, YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS IS A CONFERENCE TO SAY, WHAT ARE SOME CONCEPTS FOR DOING THAT, HOW NEEDS TO THAT MONEY BE SPENT. I WELCOME YOU ALL BELOW. IT'' S A FREE OCCASION FROM 1-3 ON SATURDAY. THANKS. >>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: KEVIN CONWAY. SPEAKER: GREAT NIGHT, MAYOR AND ALSO COUNCIL MEMBERS. I'' M BELOW TO EXPRESS MY DISAPPOINTMENT AS WELL AS PERHAPS CONFUSION AND ALSO REGARDLESS OF THE DEBATE CONCERNING THE CITY REGULATION AND ALSO WHAT THE CITY WAS COMPOSING OR LOOKING INTO CREATING SUCH AN STATUTE AND ALSO THE FACT THAT THE COUNCIL SEEM TO FEEL IT'' S AN SIMPLE LIFT AND THE OMINOUS MEDIA AND FOR PUTTING THIS OFF.IT ' S NOW NOTED AS PENDING AND ALSO WILL NOT GET ON ANY COUNCIL AGENDA PRIOR TO FEBRUARY 26TH AND ALSO PERHAPS EVEN LATER THAN. I DON'' T KNOW THE LOGISTICS BEHIND THIS AND ALSO WHY OR IF AS WELL AS HOW A DECISION CAN BE REVERSED, BUT WHATEVER THE PROCESS IS, IF THERE IS A PROCEDURE FOR REVERSING IT, I REALLY FEEL THAT NEED TO HAPPEN. THE PROCEDURE DEMONSTRATE ANY NECESSITY ABOUT YOUR ENVIRONMENT PROCESS AS WELL AS THE REGARD FOR CONCERNED PEOPLE THAT WNT TO JOIN OPEN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN A JOINT WAY AND WHICH IS TO ADVERTISE GOVERNMENT AND ENVIRONMENT AND ALSO SUSTAINABILITY. A GROWING NUMBER OF PEOPLE ARE BEING DENIED THE BENEFIT OF A FUTURE RISK-FREE HOME. I WISH TO REPEAT THAT, AS EVEN MORE AND ALSO MORE PERMITS ARE PROCESSED, INCREASINGLY MORE CITIZENS ARE BEING DENIED THE ADVANTAGES OF A FUTURE RISK-FREE RESIDENCE.

AFTER WHAT WE ARE ALL EXPERIENCING AS WELL AS GOING THROUGH THESE FIRES, I WEAR'' T UNDERSTAND IT. I WISH A PERSON WILL CERTAINLY HAVE THE SENSE OF URGENCY AND LEADERSHIP THAT IS NEEDED TO GET THIS REGULATION TALKED ABOUT EARLIER THAN LATE FEBRUARY OR MARCH. IT'' S DIFFICULT TO IMAGINE An ISSUE THAT IS WORTHY OF EVEN MORE NECESSITY THAN THIS, THANK YOU. >>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: AARON DAVIS FOLLOWED BY KEITH WOODS. PUBLIC AUDIO SPEAKER: HI, THIS REMARK IS ABOUT GENERAL POLITICAL INTERACTION AND ALSO IT'' S SORT OF HRD TO MAKE. BOTH ARE OPPRESSORS and also allies REQUIRED LIABILITY AND ALSO IN SOME CASES THE LINE IN BETWEEN 2 IS A LITTLE MURKY. THE MAJORITY OF OUR CITY COUNCIL IS TRADITIONALIST. IT MAKES NO QUALMS ABOUT BEING ON THE SIDE OF INDUSTRY AND ALSO An ORGANIZATION GENERALLY. JULIE, WORDS ARE ONE VOTES and thing ARE ONE POINTS AND ALSO ACTIVITY IS ANOTHER PERSON. IT'' S EXCELLENT THAT YOUES PARTNER POSITIONS THAT STAND UP FOR US. IT ' S EXCELLENT THAT YOU ELECT GRADUALLY ON CONCERNS, BUT YOU ARE ALSO EQUINE TRADING WITH INDIVIDUALS AS WELL AS DOING BUSINESS AS USUAL WHEN THERE ARE GROSS CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS RIGHT IN THIS CHAMBER AND ALSO OUT THERE ON THE STREETS.I THINK W HAVE GIVEN YOU EXCESSIVE CREDIT SCORE HERE PUBLICALLY WITHOUT SAYING A BIT REGARDING IT. I WOULD TRULY INVITE YOU. I JUST REVIEW AN ARTICLE A PAIR WEEKS BACK CONCERNING 2 CITY BOARD MEMBERS WHO STOOD WITH THEIR PEOPLE AGAINST BIG SERVICES AND ALSO GOT ARRESTED BY THEIR OWN AUTHORITIES FORCES. IT IS FEASIBLE TO STAND WITH United States TO RATHER THAN DOING COMPANY AS USUAL DOWN THERE WITH ORGANIZATION PEOPLE AND ALSO COPS, TO BE UP HERE WITH US TO USAGE YOUR BULLY PULPIT TO LEAD AS WELL AS TO OBTAIN HUNDREDS AS WELL AS THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE BEHIND OUR MOVEMENT TO BOOST PRODUCT CONDITIONS, TO IMPROVE OUR POLITICS, TO IMPROVE OUR AUTONOMOUS PARTICIPATION.

TO ENCOURAGE OUR AREAS AND OURSELVES INDIVIDUALLY AND ALSO NOT JUST A BLESSED FEW. IT'' S WONDERFUL THAT YOU PLAGUE PEOPLE CONCERNING GETTING SECURE CAR PARKING ON THE AGENDA. COMMONLY, AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE, AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE, BUT THEN YOU JOIN THE CHOOSE OPENING MAKING PUBLIC CAR PARKING FREE BEYOND OR NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS HERE AS THROUGHOUT THE HOLIDAYS WHICH REGARDING I UNDERSTAND HAS NO SAFETY PROVISIONS FOR THE POOR. YOU ARE UP THERE DOING BUSINESS AS USUAL. WE REQUIREMENT TO BE DISRUPTING THINGS THAT OPPRESS US. WE NEED TO BE STANDING HIGHLY AGAINST CIVILS RIGHTS ABUSES. SIGNS UP WITH US ON THIS SIDE, PLEASE. DON'' T SIMPLY SAY IT. >>DO IT. > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: THANKS, KEITH WOODS. SPEAKER: MAYOR COURSEY, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, THANKS, MY NAME IS STEVE WOODS.I HELP THE

NORTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE. I WANT TO THANK TO THOSE WHO AIDED US WITH OUR PROBLEM AND FOUND An OPTION FOR THOSE THAT WERE IN THE HOMELESS CAMPMENT– ENCAMPMENT IN OUR RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FOR 6 MONTHS. IT WAS A HORRIBLE SITUATION NOT SIMPLY FOR THE TENNANTS BUT THE INDIVIDUALS. MY HEART WENT OUT TO THEM BECAUSE I COULD SEE HOW DIFFICULT LIFE HAD END UP BEING. I DESIRE TO SELECT A FEW INDIVIDUALS FOR ADDRESSING THE ISSUE WITH REGARD AND DIGNITY AND NOT ONLY THOSE THAT DEALT WITH United States BUT THOSE PEOPLE THAT WERE SHORT-LIVED NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBORS.

I WISH TO SELECT ALL INDIVIDUAL IN THE MAYOR'' S OFFICE, THE CITY ATTORNEY, KELLY, DAVID RED WINE, THAT DOESN'' T APPEARANCE LIKE A SMART ACCOUNTING PROFESSIONAL, AS WELL AS THE POLICE HAD A CHALLENGING JOB. I UNDERSTAND YOU WERE HAM STRUNG FOR A WHILE OWN WHAT YOU COULD AND ALSO COULDN'' T DO AND I RECOGNIZE WHAT WE ARE DEALING WITH WITH ON THE BEING HOMELESS IN THE LOCATION. 2 INSIDE THIS STOOD OUT, ONE, ON THE HOMELESS PROBLEM AS I WAS FAMILIAR WITH LOTS OF OF THEM THROUGHOUT THE ROAD AND ALSO IN YOUR AREA. I BEGAN TO REALIZE THAT HOMELESSNESS IS NOT YOUR PROBLEM. IT'' S NOT SIMPLY GOVERNMENT ' S PROBLEM. THIS IS A SOCIETAL ISSUE THAT WE'' VE GOT TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT. IT'' S GOTTEN SO SERIOUS NT SIMPLY FOR PEOPLE THAT ARE INFLUENCED LIKE ORGANIZATION OWNERS LIKE US, THAT'' S NOT THE PROBLEM, BUT BY NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS, BUSINESS NEIGHBORHOOD, GROUPS LIKE OURS, WE NEED TO REPAIR THIS.I MET MORE NICE PEOPLE ACROSS THE ROAD THAT DESERVE A BETTER LIFE THAN THEY ARE LEADING AS WELL AS IT'' S NOT YOUR MISTAKE.

> > ANYBODY THAT ' S 14 AND UNDER DOES NOT HAVE ANY KIND OF HEAD CONTACT. > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: ALL. > > I ' M SATISFIED TO SEPARATE IT OUT SO THEY– SHE CANISTER TAKE A BALLOT OF OPPOSITION. > > WE ARE BALLOT O THE SELECTION GIVE PRODUCT. > > WE ALREADY DID THAT.IT'' S EVERY ONE OF OUR MISTAKE OF WHAT WE HAVE CREATED AND ALSO IT'' S UNFAIR TO REFER TO THE HOMELESS AS IF IT'' S ONE BIG AN AMORPHOUS GROUP. MANY OF THEM ARE TRULY GOOD INDIVIDUALS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD COMBINED BY A FEW THAT CREATE ISSUES. THEY ARE NOT JUST THE HOMELESS, THEY ARE PEOPLE MOMENTARILY WITHOUT SHELTER AND THEY DESERVE OUR REGARD AS WELL AS AID FOR SEVERAL YEARS TO WE as well as come WANT TO BELONG OF THAT. ANYWAY, I'' M BELOW TO THANK FOR THE ATTENTION YOU OFFERED TO US AND ALSO SPECIFICALLY, KELLY, DAVID, JENNY OF CATHOLIC CHAIRS AND ALSO– CHARITIES AS WELL AS THE COPS DIVISION. LET'' S ALL DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM>. > > MANY THANKS. BRIANA? PUBLIC SPEAKER: HI, I JUST DESIRED TO SAY THAT EVERYONE HERE APPEARS TO BE SAYING THE SAME POINT WEEK AFTER WEEK, AND WHILE I PUT ON'' T FEELING LIKE JULIE SHOULD BE THE ONE TO HEAD TO JAIL FOR THIS, IT'' S ARGUABLE THAT YOU GUYS ARE ALL BREAKING THE LEGISLATION AND ALSO YOU MUST BE RESTING YOUR HEAD IN A CHILLY JAIL CLL TONIGHT. IT'' S SAD THAT WE AS A CULTURE WHICH I STATE THAT FREELY BECAUSE WE ARE NOT HAVE DOOMED THESE INDIVIDUALS TO HAVE THEIR STUFF STOLEN BY EITHER THE POLICES OR MORE HOSTILE INDIVIDUALS AND ALSO HAVE EVERY ONE OF THEIR THINGS THREW OUT THAT THEY TORTUROUSLY SPENT WEEKS OR MONTHS TRYING TO SIMPLY GATHER FROM PEOPLE WHO INVEST DAYS AS WELL AS ALL OF THEIR HARD MADE MONEY TRY TO OFFER TO THEM AS CHARITY AS WELL AS SIMPLY TAKING THAT STUFF AWAY FROM PEOPLE AS WELL AS LEAVING THEM AVAILABLE IN THE COLD AND ALSO HAVE THEIR THINGS STOLEN LIKE MONDAY NIGHT. THE BUDDHIST GAVE OUT 100 BACKPACKS. THEY BROKE DOWN 100 OF THEM. IT WAS AMAZING. AT LEAST 20-30 WERE STOLEN IN ONE NIGHT. AND YOU HAVE NOTHING ONCE MORE WTH ALL RIGHT STUFF THAT WERE STOLEN.IT ' S A

LITTLE SAD IS THAT WE HAVE THIS COMPOSTING ISSUE. WE DON'' T KNOW WHERE TO SEND OUR COMPOSTING BUT WE CANISTER HAVE FARMS OF PEOPLE MANAGING OUR YARD SQUANDERED I SONOMA REGION MARKETING THAT COMPOST, COLLECTING THE REUSING OFF THE SIDE OF THE ROADWAY. REQUIRED MANAGEMENT. IT'' S TRULY ABSURD THAT YOU HAVE A FARCE OF A COMPANIES AND $48 STAYING IN OUR COUNTY WHEN $52 GO OUT AT TE GREATEST. SO WE CAN BE MAKING EVEN MORE STUFF AS WELL AS BEING A BETTER SONOMA AREA THAT THE REMAINDER OF THE GLOBE WANTS TO FOR AGRICULTURAL AND ALSO CULTURAL, YOU KNOW, SIMPLY RELOCATING FORWARD.

IT'' S THAT PROGRESS. WE ARE NOT REALLY PROS PROGRESSIVE TODAY, WE ARE REGRESSIVE AND ALSO IT'' S DISGUSTING TO SEE WHAT'' S HAPPENING IN SONOMA AREA RIGHT NOW. YOU SHOULD PERHAPS BE ALL JAILED TONIGHT REGRETTABLY. [PRAISE]>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: THANKS, PROCEEDING TO OUR REPORT ITEMS, 14.1. MR. McGLEN. >> > > PRODUCT 14.1. REPORT-REVIEW AS WELL AS TALK ABOUT THE STATE OF THE GOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY GROWTH BLOCK GIVE CATASTROPHE RECOVERY DRAFT ACTIVITY PLAN AND ALSO GIVE DIRECTION IF SANTA ROSA OUGHT TO REQUEST AND ALSO BARGAIN A TUBBS NUN FIRE RECUPERATION STATE SUBRECIPIENT STANDING.

DAVE GIEN, SUPERVISOR OF HUSING SOCIAL WORK PRESENTING. >> > > COUNCIL MEMBERS, THIS IS A MOUTH OF A TITLE OF A RECORD BUT FOLLOWS UP FROM A RESEARCH STUDY SESSION THIS AFTERNOON. YOU HEARD FORMERLY WHAT THE SANTA ROSA STUDY REVEALS AS AN UNMET DEMAND POST CALAMITY. THIS IS A DRAFT ACTION STRATEGY PROVIDED BY THE STATE ON HOW TO TAKE THE FIRST STEPS TO ADDRESS THE HEALING.

WE ARE GOING TO GO THROUGH WHAT IS AN ACTION PLAN, WHAT'' S IT INCLUDE AS WELL AS SHUT WHAT CONVERSATION ON WHETHER WE MUST SEEK SUBRECIPIENT STANDINGS RIGHT NOW BASED ON INFORMATION WE HAVE AS OF LATE RECENTLY. >> > > THANKS. SO, FIRST WE ARE TO SPECIFY WHAT AN ACTIVITY STRATEGY IS AND WHAT IS IN FRONT OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT NOW FOR REMARK. ESSENTIALLY AS SOON AS CONGRESS LICENSES FUNDING UNDER CDBG DR COMMUNITY GROWTH CATASTROPHE GRANT, CATASTROPHE HEALING, A FEDERAL REGISTER IS PROVIDED. THIS GOES OUT, OUTLINING BASICALLY A RELEVANT CALAMITY, THE METHODOLOGY THAT WILL ENTER INTO INVESTING THE MONEY AND ADDITIONALLY DETERMINING UNMET REQUIREMENTS WHICH WE COVERED EARLIER. THE BENEFICIARIES AND THE ASOCIATED ALLOWANCES THAT WILL MAKEUP THE GRANT.SO IN THIS

INSTANCE, AFTER THE OCCASION, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WAS ONE OF THESE GRANTEES. UNDER THE FEDERAL REGISTER AND ESSENTIALLY HUD REQUIRES AN ACTIVITY STRATEGY TO BE ESTABLISHED AS PART OF THIS PROGRAM. SO HCD REAL ESTATE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT AT THIS DEGREE HAS GONE THROUGH THIS PROCEDURES AS WELL AS HAS THINK OF AN ACTIVITY PLAN WHAT I CLL A PLAN FOR THE GIVE. IT IS NOT GOING TO OFFER YOU ALL RESPONSES AS TO HOW THE PROGRAM WILL CERTAINLY RUN. IT IS BASICALLY A BASE FOR A STRATEGY FOR HOW THAT GRANT WILL OPERATE. IT WILL CERTAINLY TELL YOU WHERE THE CASH IS GOING, ARE WHAT PROGRAMS ARE ELIGIBLE, AND ALSO IT WILL CERTAINLY GIVE YOU SOME FIRST GUIDE AS WELL AS RULES AND REGULATIONS ON HOW THE GIVE WILL RUN. IT ADDITIONALLY WILL CERTAINLY INFORM YOU WHERE THE NATIONAL OBJECTIVES THAT WE DISCUSSED EARLIER. HOW IT'' S GOING TO INFLUENCE THE LOW T MODEST REVENUE, AFFLICTION, AS WELL AS IMMEDIATE NEED. AS WELL AS IT'' S LIKEWISE AN DEVELOPING DOCUMENT. IT'' S GOING TO ALTER WITH TIME THROUGH AN MODIFICATION PROCESS AND AS THE RECOVERY REVOLVES AS WELL AS THERE IS A GREAT DEAL OF DIFFERENT REASONS MODIFICATIONS CONTAINER OCCUR, BUT IT'' S DEFINITELY A LIVING PAPER THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF RECUPERATION.

AS PART OF THE PROCESS, THERE IS A PUBLIC COMMENT DURATION. ONCE THE FEDERAL REGISTER IS INITIATED, THE TIMELINE STARTS. ESSENTIALLY THE GRANTEE HAS 120 DAYS UNDER THIS FEDERAL REGISTER TO PRODUCE THE ACTIVITY STRATEGY. WITHIN THAT TIMELINE, 1 MONTH ARE REQUIRED FOR THE DOCUMENT TO BE OUT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. THIS WOULD BASICALLY INTEGRATE ANY REMARKS THAT ARE BEING AVAILABLE IN FROM THE GENERAL PUBLIC THAT COULD BE UPCOMING FROM INDIVIDUALS OR BODIES LKE YOURSELVES, BUT ESSENTIALLY ANY INDIVIDUAL HAS THE ABILITY TO REVIEW AS WELL AS REMARK ON THE DOCUMENT.

HCD WILL CERTAINLY THEN EVALUATION THOSE REMARKS, ADJUDICATE THEM AND ALSO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE GOING TO MODIFY THE DOCUMENT BASED UPON THOSE COMMENTS OBTAINED. EVERY ONE OF THOSE WILL CERTAINLY IN FACT GO IN SOME SHAPE OR FORM SO YOU WILL CERTAINLY SEE THOSE BUT THEY WILL CERTAINLY ABSOLUTELY BE ADJUDICATED AND ALSO NONES WILL CERTAINLY AFFECT THE ACTUAL DAFT THAT WILL MOST LIKELY TO HUD FOR APPROVAL. IN REGARDS TO THE ACTUAL ACTIVITY PREPARE FOR THIS OCCASION, WITHIN THE FEDERAL REGISTER, THERE WAS A GEOGRAPHIC CIRCULATION FOR THE MANY DAMAGED OR TROUBLED LOCATIONS AND ALSO BASICALLY WHAT THAT INDICATES IS THAT 80% OF THE WHOLE GRANT NEEDS TO BE USED OR ALLOCATED IN THOSE LOCATIONS WHICH THE CITY WAS ONE. THERE IS A VARIETY OF CITY CODES THERE. AS YOU ARE MINDFUL THE CITY WAS MAJORLY AFFECTED WITH THIS EVENT AS TO THE VARIOUS OTHER LOCATIONS WITHIN THE STATE THAT ARE ELIGIBLE UNDER THE GRANT.

80% OF THE FINANCING HAS BEEN IN THE ACTIVITY PLAN ALLOCATED ACROSS THOSE AREAS. ESSENTIALLY THERE WERE THREE SIGNIFICANT PROGRAMS THAT WERE DESIGNED IN THE ACTION PLAN. ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS THE PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR HOW THE GRANT WILL BE SPENT. THERE WAS AN OWNER OCCUPIED PROGRAM THAT WILL CERTAINLY BE RUN, ADMINISTERED AND EXECUTED AT THE STATE DEGREE. 47600000. THERE WAS A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROGRAM, $67.7 MILLION, AND THERE WAS ALSO AN FRAMEWORK PROGRAM OF $3.5 MILLION WHICH WAS RESERVE TO BE SOLELY USED FOR THE REGIONAL MATCH VIA FEMA'' S PUBLIC AID PROGRAM >>. > > MR. HEXSTEIN, FOLKS, CAN YOU TAKE YOUR DISCUSSION OUTSIDE SO WE CONTAINER HEAR THIS PRESENTATION? THANKS. >> > > ONE LAST NOTE, IF YOU ARE DOING MATH ON THIS, THERE WILL CERTAINLY ADDITIONALLY BE A 5% MANAGEMENT FEE, ADMINISTRATION RESERVE TO ADMINISTER THE PROGRAM WHICH THE STATE HAS RECOGNIZED IN THE ACTIVITY PLAN.

THAT IS THE CILING FOR WHAT HUD PERMITS FOR THE BENEFICIARY TO COLLECTION ASIDE FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE GIVE. THIS IS YOUR GRANT MONITORINGS AND COMPLIANCE AND TRACKING. BUT THAT'' S ALSO PART OF THE GENERAL ALLOWANCE. IN REGARDS TO THE CITY AND HOW THIS EFFECTS SECIFICALLY, IN TERMS OF THE PROPRIETOR INHABITED PROGRAM, THAT ONCE MORE WILL BE STATE RUN, STATE IMPLEMENTED. THAT WILL BE APPLICATION DRIVEN. INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE AFFECTED BY THE OCCASION CONTAINER APPLY FOR THIS SOLUTION AS WELL AS THE STATE WILL DESIGN A PROGRAM, COLLECTION UP AN APPLICATION FOR THIS PROGRAM. THEY SET A PROGRAM CAP OF $150,000 FOR EACH AND EVERY OF THOSE CANDIDATES. ESSENTIALLY WHAT THAT IMPLIES FOR THE CITY IS THAT THERE IS NO DETAILS ALLOT FOR THIS PROGRAM, BUT CITY RESIDENTS CONTAINER APPLY BASED UPON THEIR NEED.IN TERMS

OF DIRECT ALLOTMENTS, THE CITY WAS IDENTIFIED FOR $38.4 COUNTLESS THE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROGRAM. THE HCD ESSENTIALLY HAD A COMPUTATION MAKING USE OF THE FEMA INDIVIDUAL ASSISTANCE APPLICATION INFORMATION TO TRY TO ESTABLISH OR UNDERSTAND WHERE THE VOLUME WAS UPCOMING FROM IN TRYING TO MAKE THAT DECISION. THAT'' S DETAILED IN THE ACTIVITY PLAN, BUT THE CITY'' S PORTION OF THAT PARTICULAR ALLOCATION IS $38.4 MILLION, THEN ON THE FRAMEWORK MTCH PROGRAM, THE CITY WAS NOT ESPECIALLY CALLED OUT. THE REGION WAS AT $1.2 MILLION OF THE $3.5 MILLION AND ALSO ONCE AGAIN THAT WAS BASED UPON THE H CD'' S UNMET NEEDS AS COMPONENT OF THE ACTION STRATEGY PROCEDURE >>. > > SO WE PUT THE SLIDE SUMMARIZING THE SANTA ROSA TRUST FUND AFFORDABLE HOUSING PIPELINE JUST TO EMPHASIZE THAT THIS IS BASED ON ONE OF THE MOST RECENT NOTICE OF FINANCING AVAILABILITY, THE REAL ESTATE AUTHORITY RAN THIS PAST JULY.

THERE WERE 9 JOBS CONTINUING TO BE AMOUNTING TO JUST OVER 900 DEVICES AND ALOCAL SUIT REQUIREMENTS OF $45 MILLION. AND ALSO SO THIS REMAINS IN ENHANCEMENT TO 2 JOBS THAT THE HOUSING AUTHORITY CURRENTLY FUNDED THAT WOULD BE LANTANA 48 UNITS AND PARK WOOD 56 UNITS. IT DOES NOT CONSIST OF THE CROSSING ON AS STONS AND I INTEND TO INCLUDE TO SHOW THAT WITH THIS RESEARCH WE CANISTER MOVE THIS TASK ONWARD. >> > > THANKS. >> > > SIMPLY A QUICK QUESTION ON THAT PARTICULAR. DO WE DEMAND TO IDENTIFY THE PROJECTS THAT THIS WOULD BE USED ON AHEAD OF TIME? >> > > NO, IT WOULD BE STAFF'' S RECOMMENDATION THAT WHEN WE EXECUTE OUR STANDARD CONTRACT WITH THE STATE TO RECEIVE THIS SOURCE THAT WE WOULD MEET THE COUNCIL AND GO THROUGH ANOTHER NOTICE OF FINANCING AVAILABILITY PROCESS BASED ON BASIC CRITERIA THAT IS VERY IMPORTANT. ONE KEY VARIABLE WOULD BE TASK PREPAREDNESS AS WELL AS DEVELOP EXPERIENCES AS WELL AS LEVEL OF COST BUT THERE MIGHT BE VARIOUS OTHER POINTS THE COUNCIL MIGHT NEED T CONSIDER AS WELL AS THE DECISION TO PROCEDURE YOURSELF OR DEDICATE THAT TO THE REAL ESTATE AUTHORITY. >> > > THANK YOU >>. > > EXCELLENT. THIS MOVE IS DESIGNED TO SHOT TO DETERMINE SEVERAL OF THE ADVANTAGES AND ALSO DIFFICULTIES OF WHERE THE CITY WILL SIT AS IT ASSOCIATES TO HOW THE ACTIVITY STRATEGY WAS CREATED.

AS I STATED THAT ONER INHABITED PROGRAM WOULD BE STATE RUN AND ALSO IMPLEMENTED AND ALSO ADMINISTERED, BUT IN THE ACTION PLAN, THE CITY IS IDENTIFIED AS A SUBGRANTEE OR SUBRECIPIENT. THOSE ARE INTERCHANGEABLE TERMS FROM HUD, SO THERE WILL BE DUTIES FROM THE CITY VIEWPOINT AS IT ASSOCIATES TO THAT STANDING. SEVERAL OF THE ADVANTAGES ARE AS DAVE JUST EXPLAINED, YOU WILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO SELECT THE JOBS WHERE YOU INTEND TO USE THOSE FUNDS, AND NOT ACTUALLY BE TOLD WHERE TO INVEST THEM.THAT '

S DEFINITELY AN ADVANTAGE. THERE IS ALSO, YOU HAVE A STRAIGHT APPROPRIATION THAT IS COMMUNICATED TO YOU WHICH WILL BE COMPONENT OF A TYPICAL CONTRACT THAT THE CITY WILL GET IN WITH HCD WHICH BUCK TOTAL WILL BE LOCKED IN SO YOU WON'' T BE NECESSARILY SEEING DECREASES OR THINGS LIKE THAT IN TIME IF YOU ARE NOT WITHIN THAT CONDITION. THE LAST POINT, DAVE IS GOING TO SPEAK ABOUT THE SATISFYING WE HAD WITH HCD WILL MOST LIKELY NOT HOLD HCD'' S STRATEGY TO SERVE IN THAT ADMINISTRATION CAPABILITY, BUT THE CITY WILL CERTAINLY STILL BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR MONITORING AND ALSO CONFORMITY. HCD WILL CAN BE FOUND IN– A TRACKING AND ALSO COMPLIANT DUTY EXAMINING THAT THE CITY IS MEETING THE LETTER OF THE CONTRACT. THAT CANISTER BE IN OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES THAT WE'' VE SEEN A SUBRECIPIENT CANISTER HAVE THAT ROLE, BUT TAT WILL NOT ALWAYS BE THE SITUATION HERE.

THE BIG THING ON THE CHALLENGE SIDE TO IMPLEMENT THIS IS ABILITY TO MAKE CERTAIN YOU HAVE THE RESOURCES, THE ABILITIES TO HANDLE THE $38 MILLION AS WELL AS ANYTHING THAT COMES VIA THE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM IN TIME. THAT'' S TYPICALLY A 5-6-YEAR TIMELINE. THAT CONTAINER BE A SUBSTANTIAL BURDEN FROM A CAPABILITY POINT OF VIEW. I LIKEWISE JUST DISCUSSED WHEN YOU PARTICIPATE IN THIS AGREEMENT, ONCE THE CITY BECOMES PART OF THIS CONTRACT, YOU GO THROUGH THAT SURVEILLANCE AND ALSO CONFORMITIES WHICH CAN PRODUCE AN EXTRA BURDEN ON THE CITY IN TERMS OF TAKING CARE OF THE TOTAL BUCK OVERALL. TYPICALLY, WHEN WE GO THROUGH THAT, WE ARE ASKED HOW IS THAT FUNDED.SO THROUGH

THIS PROGRAM DOES HVE WAYS TO PAY FOR SERVICES DEPENDING UPON HOW THE SUBGRANTEE DESIGNS THEIR PROGRAM OR HOW THEY ARE GOING TO CARRY OUT THE PROGRAM, BUT THERE IS TYPICALLY A MAXIMUM OF 5% OF THE COMPLETE HONOR THAT CONTAINER BE COLLECTION ASIDE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION PRICES. HCD HAS ACTUALLY IDENTIFIED THAT IN THE ACTIVITY STRATEGY, AS WELL AS I ASSUME PLANS TO SERVE IN THAT ABILITY ACROSS ALL OF THE PROGRAMS. THIS CITY HOWEVER IN THIS INSTANCE WITH THE SUBGRANTEE CONTRACT WOULD BE ABLE TO CATEGORIES UP TO 50% OF THE $38 NUMEROUS WHAT WILL BE CALLED PROJECT SHIPMENT. ANYTHING PERTAINING TO THE LIST I SIMPLY COOPERATED REGARDS TO GETTING THOSE JOBS UP AND RUNNING, YOU WILL CERTAINLY HAVE THE ABILITY TO USAGE A 50% SET ASIDE ESSENTIALLY TO SPEND FOR THOSE KINDS OF SOLUTIONS. THERE IS REALLY NO EXPENSE IF YOU WILL. THE PROGRAM IS MADE TO COVER SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH PROGRAMS. UNFORTUNATELY IN ALL OF THESE INSTANCES, THAT INTERFERES WITH THE COMPLETE BUCK QUANTITY. THAT IS OUT TOP OF ANYTHING THAT HAS BEEN ALLOCATED. IT APPEARS OF THE ALLOTMENT TO SPEND FOR THOSE SOLUTIONS.

>> > > SO WE HAVE A 2 PART RECOMMENDATION. THE FIRST'IS WITH THE MAYOR ' S RESIDENCE IS A COLLECTIVE COUNCIL AND/OR LEGISLATIVE BODY REGARDING THE ACTIVITY PLAN AS WELL AS LIKEWISE THE CONSIDERATION AS WELL AS CONVERSATION WHETHER WE NEED TO REQUEST SUBRECIPIENT STATUS. SINCE THIS WENT TO PRINT AND FURTHER DISCUSSIONS WITH HCD AND WE HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE RIGHT HERE THIS EVENING IS THAT OUT OF THE 3 PROGRAMS THAT YOU JUST SAW, PROPRIETOR OWNER REAL ESTATE, MULTIFAMILY AND ALSO FRAMEWORK, THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA WOULD BE TREATED AS A SUBGRANTEE FOR MULTIFAMILY AND ALSO FACILITIES. TO PUT IT SIMPLY, WE WOULD RECEIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE TO RUN OUR MULTIFAMILY AND ALSO OUR OWN PROGRAM SYSTEM AS LONG AS WE FOLLOW THE BLOCK GRANT POLICIES WHICH WE UNDERSTAND HOW TO DO AND ALSO WE COULD LOOK FOR DIRECTLY FOR FRAMEWORK TASKS AND WATER RECOVERY. IT WOULD MEET SIMPLY THE PROPRIETOR OWNER PROGRAM THAT WE WOULD BE CONSIDERING TONIGHT AND ALSO IT WOULD BE OUR REFERRAL THAT WE DEAL WITH THE STATE TO ENABLE THEM TO ACHIEVE SUCCESS THAT OUR LOCAL RESIDENTS ARE MADE CONSCIOUS OF IT WHEN THAT PROGRAM IS TURNED OUT AND ALSO MONITOR IT FROM THERE AS WELL AS IF THERE ARE ISSUES RETURN AND HAVE THAT CONVERSATION AT A LATER POINT.THAT ENDS OUR PRESENTATION. I WILL MORE THAN HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY CONCERNS. > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: THANK YOU, WHO WISHES TO START WITH QUESTIONS. MR. TIBBETS? > > COUNCILMEMBER JACK TIBBETTS: THANK YOU, MAYOR >>. ON SLIDE 6, I INTENDED TO HAVE AN CONCEPT OF THE NUMBER OF UNITS ALL OF THOSE CONSOLIDATED REPRESENT? > > CURRENTLY, BASED ON THEIR PERFORMANCE IT STANDS FOR 981 SYSTEMS.> > > 981 DEVICES, THAT ' S FANTASTIC. I ' M REALLY EXCITED ABOUT THAT. OKAY. THE JOB SHIPMENT, IS THAT ANOTHER PERSON TERM FOR MANAGEMENT EXPENSE? > > YES. WE HAVE 5 YEARS TO EXPEND THE CASH ON MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS AND DISTRICT PROJECTS. > > OKAY, THAT ' S MY ONLY INQUIRIES. I HAVE A FEW COMMENTS LATER. THANKS. >> > > MR. SCHWEDHELM? > > COUNCILMEMBER TOM SCHWEDHELM: THANKS, >> MAYOR. ON SLIDE 6 >>6981 UNITS BECAUSE THIS IS FEDERAL MONEY, ARE THERE CONSTRAINTS, FR EXAMPLE UNDOCUMENTED RESIDENTS THAT WOULD BE RELOCATING RIGHT INTO THESE LOCATIONS. EXIST ANY RESTRICTIONS FROM HUD, THAT SAYS NO, IF YOU ARE NOT QUALIFIED TO APPLY FOR FEDERAL FINANCING, DOES THAT RESTRICTION THE KIND OF INDIVIDUALS THAT WOULD BE OCCUPANTS THAT SOME OF THIS FUNDING ASSISTS CREATE? > > YES, WE ARE TOLD IT WOULD NOT BE LIMITED TO THAT AS LONG AS THE RENTAL SYSTEMS ARE BUILT WITHIN THE CITY PURVIEW TO HELP THOSE DISPLACED BY THE FIRE. > > WHO IS GOING TO BE OCCUPYING THOSE TENANTS, IS THE CITY GOING TO RECOGNIZE WHO THOSE ARE? >

>> > TYPICALLY WE DO THE HOME PROPRIETOR DO THE OPTION AND CERTIFICATION FOR REVENUE AND >> SCHEDULE? > > ARE THOSE GOING TO BE SUPPLIED TO HUD OR FEMA? > > IF THE RENTER REGISTERED UNDER FEMA WE ' LL >> HAVE THAT INFORMATION BUT IT ' S OPTIONAL. > > LET ' S SAY THEY DIDN ' T, WILL CERTAINLY THE CITY PROVIDE THIS, GOING BACK TO THE UNDOCUMENTED POPULATION THAT WE KNOW ARE >> AFFLICTED BY THIS AND ALSO NOT ELIGIBLE FOR FEMA FINANCING. IF SOME OF THIS FUNDING ACTUALLY BUILT MULTI-HOUSING AND ALSO I ' M CERTAIN THOSE ISSUES, SOME MEMBERS OF OUR AREA DON ' T WANT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO KNOW WHERE THEY ARE LIVING, WOULD WE BE REQUIRED'TO OFFER THAT NAME? > > THE HUD POLICY AS IT STANDS THAT A PERSON MEMBER OF THE RESIDENCE HAS TO AT LEAST BE An U.S. RESIDENT IN ORDER TO GET APPROVED FOR A SERVICE DEVICE. > > ARE YOU CLAIMING THAT WOULD BE APPLYING TO THIS? > >

I THINK, YES. > > IF WE CANISTER GET CLARIFICATION ON THAT PARTICULAR BECAUSE I RECOGNIZE THERE ARE SOME MEMBERS OF OUR AREA WITH OUR SET ASIDE HOUSING VOUCHERS WHERE I KNOW AT THE VERY LEAST 1CASE WHERE THEY HAVE DECLINED THAT DUE TO TAT VERY MAKE OUT. > > I JUST SAW A NODDING HE HEAD-FROM THE STATE HCD. I ' M PRETTY CERTAIN. > > REGARDING THE OWNER INHABITED, FOR THE APPLICATION PROCESS, DO WE HAVE ANY CONCEPT ON HOW THE STATE WILL BE PRIORITIZING THAT GTS THE FUNDING? IT ' S MY UNDERSTANDING ONCE THE MONEY IS GONE IS GONE.HOW IS THAT PRIORITIZATION GOING TO BE ESTABLISHED AND HOW WILL WE KNOW? > > I WILL INTRODUCE MR. ZAHNEER'. I ' M GOING TO MASSACRE HIS NAME.

HE CANISTER EXPLAIN. > > GOOD NIGHT, MR. MAYOR AND ALSO MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. MY NAME IS ZAUGE FROM THE STATEHOUSING DIVISION. THIS IS A STRATEGY TO OCCUPY THE STATE PROGRAM IN THE FOUR RATES. THE FIRST RATE ARE FOR THE RESIDENTS IMPACTED BY THIS AREA WHICH IS SONOMA COUNTY AND THE LOW TO MODERATE REVENUE INDIVIDUALS. THE SECONDLY RATE IS ANY INDIVIDUAL IN THE INSURANCE COVERAGE AREAS FOR THE 2 CATASTROPHES COVERED BY THESE FINANCES THAT ARE LIKEWISE LOW MODERATE EARNINGS. THE THIRD RATE ARE HOMEOWNERS RESIDING IN THE IMPACTED AS WELL AS DISTRESSED AREAS OF ALL REVENUE VARIES AND ALSO THE 4TH RATE IS ANY ONE OF THE LOCATION STAYING IN THIS LOCATION. THE ONE CAVEAT IS THAT WE WILL CERTAINLY PRIORITIZE A HOUSEHOLD WITH ANY RELATIVE WITH EASE OF ACCESS PROBLEMS THAT WILL BE RELOCATED TO THE FIRST. THE OBJECTIVE IS TO SPEND IS

MONEY DOWN THESE TIERS UNTIL WE RUN OUT OF MONEY. > > SO RATE ONE STANDARD COULD EXTINGUISH ALL THE FUNDS? > > WE DON ' T KNOW, SIR. THAT ' S WHY COMPONENT OF THE STATE ' S ACTION PLAN PROPOSES TO PERFORM A >> SURVEY TO OBTAIN AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT ' S THE LAY> OF THE'LAND NOW AS WELL AS WHAT ' S TE'REAL DEMAND. TILL AFTER THAT, WE WON ' T KNOW. > > I BELIEVE THAT ' S UP TO$ 150,000. EXIST OTHER BUCK QUANTITIES AS WELL AS HOW IS THAT GOING TO BE DECIDED IF IT ' S> NOT OPTIMUM QUANTITY, HOW WILL THAT BE DECIDED? > > IT ' S A PARTICULAR COMPUTATION OF ENSURING NO FRINGE BENEFIT. THIS IS A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DEMAND. WE ' LL BEGINNING WITH WHAT YOUR VOID IS AND ALSO REDUCE WHATEVER FEMA OR SBA AND ALSO

WHATEVER FINANCIAL RESOURCES REMAIN IN AREA WHICH IDENTIFIES YOUR VOID. > > WHEN WILL WE UNDERSTAND HOW THAT PROCESS IS ESTABLISH? > > THE ACTIVITY PLAN IS PRIORITIZING FACILITIES NEEDED TO DEVELOP HOUSING THAT ' S THE FEMA >> SUIT RECOMMENDING IN THE ACTIVITY PLAN. > > SO $1.4 MILLION IS NOT THAT FAR OF WHAT I KNOW TO BE IN SONOMA COUNTY. HOW WLL THEY BE PRIORITIZING SAY THE COUNTY HAS SOMETHING AND THE AREA OF SONOMA AS WELL AS THE REQUIREMENTS OF$ 1.2 MILLION I ' M SPECULATING WILL CERTAINLY NOT GO TOO MUCH. > > THIS IS WHAT WE ' LL NEED TO TESTIMONIAL GOING AHEAD. THERE ARE REALLY RESTRICTED FUNDS. I INTEND TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THESE DOLLARS ARE NOT GOING TO MAKE'EVERYONE WHOLE. EVERYBODY I WOULD$1 >> BILLION IN NEEDS'AND WE ARE DISCUSSING$124 MILLION, SO THEY ARE SPEAKING ABOUT PUTTING ROOFINGS OVER PEOPLE ' S HEADS AND WE ' LL SEE IF WE CANISTER ACCOMPLISH THAT. > > WE ARE TO CHECK OUT EVALUATING THE STATE AND ALSO EVALUATE WHAT THIS NEED WAS AND ALSO AIDS ADDRESS THESE CLASSIFICATIONS THROUGHOUT THIS BOARD. > > THOSE ARE 2 DISCUSSIONS WE'ARE HAVING BELOW BECAUSE WITH THOSE BASED IN

>> HOW WE WISH TO CATEGORIES THAT AND YOU ARE DISCUSSING THE ADDED REQUIREMENT. > > CORRECT. > > THAT ' S ALL THE CONCERNS I HAVE NOW. > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: MS. COMBS? > > COUNCILMEMBER JULIE COMBS: THANK YOU, I VALUE IT. > > > > SO, IF I ' M UNDERSTANDING CORRECTLY, WITH REGARD TO THE PROPRIETOR OCCUPIED HOUSING PROGRAM, >> THERE IS TIERING. DOES THE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROGRAM HAVE COMPARABLE TIERING, FOR INSTANCE, WOULD >>A RENTER WHO WAS DISPLACED IN SANTA ROSA HAVE A PRIORITY OVER A >> >> LESSEE THAT WAS DISPLACED SOMEWHERE ELSE IN AN INFLUENCED REGION? > > THE ACTIVITY PLAN PRESENTLY DOES NOT TALK TO TIERING IN THE MULTIFAMILY PROGRAM. WHEN WE COME BACK TO THE CUNCIL ON A DRAFT OF NOTIFICATION OF FINANCING SCHEDULE AND ALSO THE COUNCIL INTENDED TO INCLUDE SOME ADDITIONAL PROBLEMS, WE COULD CERTAINLY DO SO AT THAT TIME. > > IT DISCUSSES LOW TO >> MODERATE. DO YOU INTEND TO CONSIST OF EXTREMELY LOW TO EXTREMELY LOW WHEN YOU CLAIM LOW, OR ARE YOU CLAIMING LOW DUE TO THE FACT THAT YOU ARE MAKING USE OF THAT LOW AS A REGARD TO ART? > > AGAIN, WE COULD DO AND TARGET ANYTHING BUT THE NOTICE OF THE FUNDING SCHEDULE CHOICE FOR HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS, VERY >> LOW, TYPICALLY WHEN WE RATE AND ALSO RANKING APPLICATIONS FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY WE TAKE A LOOK AT THE LEVEL OF PRICE, THE DEPTH OF AFFORDABILITY AND ALSO THE CLIENT. > > DO WE USE THE SUSCEPTABILITY INDEX? > > WE DID NOT. > > OKAY, I WOULD HAVE AN INTEREST IN THAT. AND IN MAKING CERTAIN THAT OUR SANTA ROSA HOMELESS AS WELL AS OUR SANTA ROSA DISPLACED HAVE HIGHER CONCERN THAN OTHERS WITHOUT REMOVING IT TOTALLY. DO WE HAVE PLANS TO OFFER AID FOR USING FOR THE PROPRIETOR INHABITED HOUSING PROGRAM? I ' M SEEING PROGRAMS WHERE SPECIFIC HOME OWNERS ARE EXPECTED TO KNOW AND ALSO UNDERSTAND HOW TO PERFORM SOMETHING AND ALSO THAT CONTAINER BE REALLY TOUGH. > > I WOULD BE HAPPY TO TAKE THAT ONE. IN THE STATES PREPARE ACTION PLAN, THERE WILL CERTAINLY BE INSTANCE MANAGERS TO AID THE HOUSE OWNERS STROLL THROUGH ' VERY DIFFICULT PROCEDURAL PROCEDURE. > > IS THAT MISTAKE TO THE STATE TO FUND OR THE CITY TO FUND? > > THE STATE. THIS BELONGS TO THE CENTRALIZED OWN YOU ARE INHABITED. > > O.K., YOU STATED THE FEMA FACILITIES MATCH PROGRAM, IN OUR NOTES IT CLAIMS >> ALLOCATED JOINTLY TO SONOMA AREA AND THE CITY, BUT LATER MENTIONED THE 1$ 1.2 MILLION GOING TO THE REGION.

> > COUNCIL MEMBERS, THIS IS A MOUTH OF A TITLE OF A RECORD BUT COMPLIES WITH UP FROM A STUDY SESSION THIS MID-DAY. > > SIMPLY A FAST INQUIRY ON THAT. > > TERRIFIC. > > WE DON ' T KNOW, SIR. > > THAT ' S ALL THE INQUIRIES I HAVE RIGHT CURRENTLY.IS IT GOING TO THE COUNTY OR COTTAGE– COMING BELOW COLLECTIVELY? >> > > ONCE AGAIN, IT ' S AMBIGUOUS IN THE ACTION AND THE STATE WILL TAKE A LOK AT THE DAMAGES WHEN RESOLVING THIS SPECIFIC RESOURCE. >> > > O.K., CURRENTLY, I HAD ACTUALLY STATED FORMERLY, I'' M HAVING A LITTLE TROUBLE INFORMING WHAT I WAS MEANT TO SAY AT THE EARLIER RESEARCH SESSION AND ALSO WHAT I WAS SUPPOSED TO ASK ABOUT BELOW. I HAD ASKED EARLIER AT THE RESEARCH STUDY SESSION ABOUT THE FACILITIES OF OH YOU ARE GARBAGE DUMP WHICH HAS HAD SO MUCH DISCARDED IN IT BECAUSE OF THE ADDED WASTE THAT WE HAVE CONSIDERABLY SHORTENED THE LIFE OF OUR LAND FILL.

DOES THAT CONSIDER WHEN FEMA DOES INTO THE SUIT PROGRAM? >> > > NO >>. > > OKAY, I WOULD DESIRE THAT WE TAKE A LOOK AT A VARIETY OF GAPS, INCLUDING THAT DUE TO THE FACT THAT THAT APPEARS TO ME TO BE A SIGNIFICANT COST. I'' M NOT SEEING IN HERE WHERE I BELIEVED I WOULD SEE DURABILITY OR REDUCTION STEPS. WHICH CATEGORY HAS THE RESILIENCE AS WELL AS MITIGATION STEPS? >> > > THE RESILIENT AS WELL AS MITIGATION PROCEDURES ARE SHOWING UP UNDER A DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK THAT WILL BE OUT IN A MONTH OR SO. THAT'' S WHERE THAT DISCUSSION WILL CERTAINLY EXIST. > > I TOUGHT CDBG DR CONSISTED OF STRENGTH AND FRAMEWORK. IS THIS An ITEM OF CDBG? >> > > I BELIEVE, COUNCIL MEMBERS, YOU TIN GIVE DIRECTION TO THE STATE T TAKE THAT RIGHT INTO FACTOR TO CONSIDER. WHAT THE STATE HAS ACTUALLY PROPOSED IS AN ACTIVITY PLAN TO SATISFY THE PARTICULAR PROGRAM WHICH THEY HAVE DETERMINED AS ONE OF THE MOST PUSHING AS INDIVIDUALS ATTEMPT TO RESTRUGGLE WITH RESTORING.

SO THAT IS OPEN I BELIEVE FOR CONSIDERATION. THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL MONIES TO ADDRESS REDUCTION OR RESILIENCY BUT YOU COULD APPROXIMATELY THIS FACTOR OFFER DIRECTION FOR THE STATE TO INCLUDE THAT ON AN PRIVATE HOME OWNER PROGRAM. >> > > I WOULD HOPE THE STATE WOULD APPEARANCE AT THREAT MITIGATION PROGRAMS AS GET OR MOVING AS WELL AS IMPROVEMENTS IN STRUCTURE MTERIALS AND GUARANTEEING FAR BETTER FIRE SECURE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION. THE CASE IN POINT IS THE UNIQUE VENTING SYSTEM THAT COST ADDITIONAL. IT DOESN'' T MAKE GOOD SENSE TO SPEED UP HOMES THAT WILL CERTAINLY REFUTE THE MEANS THEY DID. THAT DOESN'' T MAKE SENSE. IF WE ARE GOING TO HAVE ADDITIONAL FUNDS UPCOMING IN, LET'' S MITIGATE AND MAKE MORE RESISTANT WHILE WE ARE DOING IT. THANKS QUITE, I APPRECIATE IT. >> > > MR. VICE-MAYOR? >> > > MANY THANKS, MR.MAYOR, I INTENDED TO DISCUSS THE FOUR RATES AND ALSO IF YOU TIN FUND IN TIERS ONE AS WELL AS HAVING TO GO TO TIERS 2, 3, 4. THERE IS AN IMPLIED INQUIRY THERE ABOUT TIMELINE. IF YOU PROVIDED United States ENOUGH TIME WE CAN EXHAUST ANY BASICS INDICATED– FUNDS ALLOTED TO United States FROM EACH RATE, I GUARANTEE YOU. EXISTS A PLAN WHERE TO SPEND THOSE FUNDS ON? >> > > WE HAVE An OVERALL OF 6 YEARS TO SPEND THESE DOLLARS. WHATEVER IS LEFT OVER, POOF, IT DISAPPEARED. SO WE WILL CERTAINLY BE DILIGENTLY TRACKING IN WHICH EXPENSES ARE HAPPENING AND ALSO MOVING THE CASHES AROUND, I THINK THIS IS WHAT MATT WAS REFERRING REGARDING THE AMENDMENTS TO THE ACTION PLAN. WE ARE GAINING FROM OUR– FLORIDA. THAT THERE ARE DOZENS OF AMENDMENTS TO THEIR ACTION STRATEGY AND THEY ARE ONLY A FEW YEARS INTO IT.WE HAVE TO SEE WHAT THE NEED IS BEFORE WE CAN STEP ANY OF THOSE CASH AROUND. >> > > FOR SIX 6 YEARS TO HAVE THE FUNDS DESIGNATED TO THE CITY, SHOVELS IN THE GROUND. >> > > 6 YEARS I SPENDING THE MONEY, NOT JUST– INCUMBERED. >> > > DOES THE STATE TAKE THAT 5%. >> > > WHOEVER TAKES THAT GENERAL, AS YOU TAKE An APPEARANCE AT THE PORTION. AT THIS MOMENT THE OWN YOU ARE OCCUPANT PROGRAM WILL BE RUNNING AT A NEIGHBORHOOD DEGREE WHICH WILL MAKE THE FUNDS TO BE AVAILABLE. >> > > EXCELLENT. WHEN IT CONCERNS THE TWO AREAS WHERE WE ARE POSSIBLY ASKING FOR SUBRECIPIENT CONDITION, I HEARD THE STATE WILL CERTAINLY STILL HAVE OVERSIGHT AS WELL AS COMPLIANCE OVER THE TASK. IF SOMETHING IS OUT OF CONFORMITY ULTIMATELY, DOES THAT MEAN THE STATE STILL TAKES ON OBLIGATION. WE'' VE HEARD HORROR TALES WHERE 6 YEARS LATER ON FEMA SAYS WE SHOULDN'' T HAVE GIVEN YU THOSE DOLLARS, GIVE

US THE DOLLARS BACK.WHO HAS THE OBLIGATION IF WE ARE OUT OF COMPLIANCE BECAUSE SITUATION? >> > > THE HUD TEAM HAS MADE IT VERY CLEAR THAT THE BUCK STOPS AT HCD. IF THERE IS A NON-COMPLIANCE ISSUE AND ALSO SETTLEMENT ISSUE, IT'' S AT THE STATE LEVEL. THE STATE MAY ACT, BUT WE ARE FULLY IN CHARGE OF EERY SINGLE DOLLAR OF THE DR MONEY. >> > > EXCELLENT. I WISH TO ECHO MY COLLEAGUES REMARKS IN THE DIRECTION OF RESILIENCY OF THE GARBAGE DUMP AND POSSIBLE I BELIEVE WHAT WAS PRICED QUOTE EARLIER IN THE DISCUSSION WAS THE NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBOR PROGRAM AND WHOLE LOT NEXT DOOR PROGRAM. I WOULD BE INTERESTED IN United States HAVING THAT CONVERSATION TOO. I UNDERSTAND THAT THAT IS LIKELY TO CME WITH THE $88 MILLION FOR RESILIENCY, BUT I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE THAT DISCUSSION AND ALSO MY FINAL AND ALSO I KEEP ASKING THIS OF TEAM THAT THIS IS AN INCOMPLETE PROGRAM, IT'' S A SHELL, UNDERSTANDING THAT WE WILL BE RETURNING FOR MORE RESOURCES LATER. THIS IS A QUESTION TO THE MAYOR, DID YOU INFORM THIS PARTICULAR PUT US IN A POSITION WHERE IT'' S FEASIBLE FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OR STATE GOVERNMENT TO AT THE END OF THIS SAY THE THE MAJORITY OF AFFECTED LOCATIONS HAVE APPROVED WHAT OUR PLAN WAS WE ARE GOING TO MOVE ONTO OTHER DISASTERS THAT HAVE TOOK PLACE OR DO YOU FEEL WE ARE IN A STRONGER SETTING TO ADDITIONALLY ARGUE FOR UNMET DEMAND? >> > > I THINK EARLIER TODAY WAS AND ONCE AGAIN, I BELIEVE I CLAIMED EARLIER, I ASSUME WHAT WOULD BE EXTREMELY HELPFUL IS THE COUNCIL WOULD GIVE EXPLICIT INSTRUCTIONS BASED ON THE UNMET REQUIREMENTS AND ALSO EVALUATIONS THAT HAGGERTY HAS PUT FOR THE CITY TO DIRECT TEAM TO FUNCTION WITH THE STATE TO DEMAND ADDITIONAL RESOURCES BASED ON OUR STUDIES ON UNMET NEED.I THINK THESE ARE TWO PARALLEL TRACKS THAT WE NEED TO INVOLVE ON AS WELL AS TRUTHFULLY AS A RESULT OF THE CHANCE IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS, ADDITIONAL DR CASH MAY BE BECOMING AVAILABLE AS A RESULT OF THE DISASTERS REGRETTABLY IN THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND ALSO SOUTHERN THE GOLDEN STATE AREA THAT WOULD BE PRACTICAL FOR US AND ALSO SUPPLY QUALITY TO THE STATE THAT THIS IS EXACTLY WHERE YOU WANT United States TO GO. >> > > ALL. THANK YOU SO MUCH. >> > > A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS ON THE $88 MILLION. THAT IS GOING TO NEED A DIFFERENT ACTION STRATEGY FROM THE STATE TO USAGE THAT CASH? AND WHAT'' S THE TIMELINE FOR THAT? >> > > WE DON ' T KNOW YET UP UNTIL THE FEDERAL REGISTER IS PUBLISHED AND ALSO OBTAINS THE CLOCK GOING. WE'' VE GOTTEN SOME EVENTS– INDICATORS THAT IT MIGHT HAPPEN IN DECEMBER. >> > > O.K., THAT WILL COINCIDE TIME CLOCK AS THE $124 MILLION WAS? >> > > WE ARE PRESUMING THAT, YES. >> > > I WILL CERTAINLY SIMPLY ADVISE COUNCIL THAT FOR THE AUGUST ACTION STRATEGY WE HAD BEEN INFORMED THROUGHOUT THIS SUMMER THAT IT WOULD BE MAY, JUNE, JULY, AUGUST.

I WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED IF IT DOES NOT GO INTO NEXT YEAR. >> > > SO, IT ' S BEEN SUGGESTED THAT WE REQUEST THE CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT PROGRAMS SUCH AS BUYING PROPERTY AND ALSO NOT RESTORING ON IT TO AVOID FUTURE FIRES. IF WE WERE ABLE TO PERFORM THAT, WOULD WE BE RESTRICTED TO ONLY ACQUIRING RESIDENCES FROM PEOPLE WHO MET THE INCOME REQUIREMENTS? >> > > 70 %OF THE FUNDS MUST BENEFIT IN SUCH A WAY TO THOSE LOW TO MODERATE. THESE FUNDS CONTAINER ONLY GO TO PAY TO DOCUMENTED IMPACTS FROM THE DISASTER. I ASSUME IT'' S A DOUBLE MIX OF WHO WAS IMPACTED AND THEN AN EARNINGS LEVEL. >> > > OK. THERE IS ASO A POINTER THAT WE PUT A PARTICULAR NEED ON MULTIFAMILY HOUSING THAT WE HAD ICLUDED IN THE OBJECTIVES THAT WE HAD FOR OUR STEP N BOND, THE REAL ESTATE BOND THAT FELL SHORT IN NOVEMBER. SUCH AS TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT, EARNINGS RESTRICTED NET ABSOLUTELY NO POWER, THOSE KINDS OF THINGS.WOULD WE BE ABLE TO CREATE FOR HOUSING WITH THESE FUNDS? > > GENERALLY, >> THESE ARE IN YOUR AREA DRIVEN AND THEY ARE GOING TO COLLECTION WHAT THEIR NEEDS ARE FOR THE AREA. WE WILL CERTAINLY FOLLOW UP ON THAT. WHAT WE ARE SEARCHING FOR IS COMPLIANCE FOR THE CDBG DR NEEDS. > > AND ALSO, AND ALSO WE WILL DO THAT AS YOU HAVE CLAIMED PRIOR TO. > > ANY CONCERNS? I HAVE A FEW CARDS. GEORGE? SPEAKER: THANKS, COUNCIL MEMBERS, YOU ARE ALL DOING YOUR BEST TO PUT THIS CHAMBER TO REST. I WEAR ' T KNOW IF IT ' S GOING TO WORK. I WEAR'' T KNOW IF YU HEARD THE GENERAL PUBLIC BUT THEY ARE MAD. I WAS LISTENING TO THE EXPERTS FROM THE STATE. REGARDING THESE CDBG FUNDS, I'' M SO GLAD WE ARE CHATTING ABOUT IT BECAUSE I LIKEWISE HEARD THINGS LIKE A CAP, 5% CAP ON WHAT YOU GUYS CANISTER PAY YOURSELVES FOR DEALING WITH THE HOMELESS ISSUE.70% HAS TO GO TO THE HOMELESS, IT NEEDS TO GO TO INDIVIDUAL WHO IN FACT NEED THIS MONEY. WE COULD NOT SIMPLY PAY A LOTS OF BUREAUCRATS TO ADMINISTER SOMETHING THAT DOESN'' T AID. I HAVE GOT THAT RIGHT HERE. THIS IS TO ASSIST PEOPLE WITH AIDS. THAT ' S A CDBG PROGRAM. THIS IS FROM FEBRUARY 22ND OF THIS YEAR. RIGHT? NOW, THIS MONEY HAS A CAP ON IT, 15% FOR SOLUTIONS.

10%, INTENDING AS WELL AS MANAGEMENT? RIGHT RIGHT HERE I SEE $249,520.31. I BELIEVE I ALSO LISTENED TO COMPLIANCE. KEEPING TRACK OF COMPLIANCE. WE GOT ALSO PUBLIC SERVICES. $188,000. 42.76%. CURRENTLY, SUBTOTAL FOR HOUSING $16,791. THAT'' S 6.31%. REAL ESTATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH AIDS. THAT DO YOU BELIEVE PROFITED ONE OF THE MOST FROM THAT? THE PEOPLE WITH AIDS THAT DON'' T HAVE ANYWHERE TO REST OR THE INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE SUPPOSED TO ADMINISTER THE PROGRAM? I PUT ON'' T THINK IT ' S A SECRET AS WELL AS I WEAR ' T THINK THE PEOPLE WHO WERE SUPPOSED TO ADMINISTER THAT PROGRAM ARE CONFUSED. ARE WE SUPPOSED TO PAY OURSELVES 2% OF THAT MONEY. I DON'' T THINK ANY O United States ARE CONFUSED ABOUT WHAT THIS MEANS. INDIVIDUALS ARE NO MORE BEARING WITH THIS GOOD POLICE OFFICER NEGATIVE POLICE OFFICER. THERE IS NO CHANCE FOR YOU TO KNOW WHAT OCCURRED TO THIS MONEY. WE NEED TO QUIT CLAIMING LIKE YOU ARE THE GOD MAN. ALL. JANUARY 26TH, YOU GUYS WANT TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS, JANUARY 26TH AT THE FRANCIS. I HAVE ACTUALLY SEARCHED FOR THE POLICE ORGANIZATIONS THAT YOU CONTAINER CONTACT THESE INDIVIDUALS. IT'' S TAKEN YEARS TO ACCOMPLISH IT BUT IF YOU WANT TO OBTAIN SOMETHING DONE ABOUT IT JANUARY 26TH.

APPEAR TO PUT THESE INDIVIDUALS BEHIND BARS. PUBLIC AUDIO SPEAKER: OK, I'' M RIGHT HERE TO VOICE MY OPPOSITION TO THIS FEMA AND ALSO FEDERAL MONIES. WE ARE DISCUSSING TREASON, MURDERERS THAT INVEST BILLIONS FROM THE GOLDEN STATE AND OFFER US A RATION BY CONTRAST. TAKE A LOOK AT THE TABLE RIGHT DOWN THERE IN SPECIFIC, 5 INDIVIDUALS, WE ARE PROHIBITED TO DROP THERE. WE ARE FORBIDDEN TO USAGE THE RESTROOMS THAT WE PAY FOR AND ALSO THESE INDIVIDUALS MAKE MORE MONEY OFF OUR TAX OBLIGATIONS THAN THESE PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE ASSEMBLE TWO TIMES.

THESE ARE THE KIND OF INDIVIDUALS THAT WILL CERTAINLY BUY THESE RESIDENCES AND LEASE THEM OUT AND MEXICAN FAMILIES WILL REMAIN IN ONE HOUSE AS WELL AS THEY ARE CHARGED UP AS WELL AS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING CHANGES. FINANCIALLY WE DISTRIBUTE OUR POWER AND ECONOMICALLY A LOT OF United States GET ON SMELLS WHILE FEMA OPERATES DECEPTIVENESS. NONE OF THIS IS GOING TO ONE OF THE MOST NEED, RIGHT? A PLAN THAT FUNCTIONS, PULLING CORRUPTION TO ITS KNEES. ALL MY– GRANTEES ALL INDIVIDUAL IN SONOMA REGION OBTAIN THOUGH PAY THEIR LEAS. AFTER 2 MONTHS, MOST OF US AGREE TO PAY 25% THAN BEFORE. THE CITY HAS NO RECORE. THE REGULATION FACILITY WILL CERTAINLY APPLAUD YOU. AND SO THAT ALL INSTRUCTORS, CITY, COUNTY, STATE EMPLOYEES CANISTER GO TO A 20-HOUR WORKWEEK AND MAKE MORE THAN BEFORE. WE JUST OPENED 43,000 EVEN MORE WORK. THEY ARE NOT STUPID PEOPLE. THEY FIND OUT ABOUT INJUSTICE. SEEING AT THE MALLS AND ALSO THE SHOP. WE ARE KEEPING OUR OWN INJUSTICE. MAINTAINING ALL BATTLE, BOTH INTERNATIONAL AND DOMESTIC. BE and also occur CONQUERING AND ALSO BEING REALLY MAJESTIC.FOR WHAT IS XMAS REPRESENT? THE CARNAGE OF CHRIST. TRUTH POWER AND THE LIGHT THAT THE WORLD IS SOUGHT TO HEIST. WE ARE ONE OF THE MOST EFFECTIVE INDIVIDUALS ON THE COUNCIL. AND THE UNITED STATE CONSTITUTION, YOU ALL CONTINUE TO BE ON THIS MESS. THE AUTHORITIES MIND TO SAY AS IDO. THE AUTHORITY IS YOURS TO MAKE IT BECOME A REALITY. >> > > THANK YOU >>. > > [> INDISTINCT] > > THANK >> YOU, MR. TURNIF. > > WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A 5-MINUTE BREAK. >> > [DAMAGE]> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: I ' M GOING TO CALL THIS MEETING BACK TO ORDER.WE HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF ITEMS ON A great deal and the program TO MAKE IT THROUGH. WE WISH TO MAKE IT THROUGH THIS AND ALSO I WISH YOU WILL CERTAINLY WISH TO SURVIVE THIS. I APPRECIATE YOUR PERSISTENCE. >> > > YOU WERE SPEAKING ON THING 14.1. I INVITE YOU TO PROCEED. >> > > THANK YOU, MAYOR COURSEY AN MEMBERS. STEVE WITH THE LAND USAGE COALITION. WE FAVOR COMPACT GROWTH DOWNTOWN, TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT APPEALS TO US AND ALSO WE ARE PLEASED TO HEAR THAT IS COMPONENT OF THIS PROGRAM. I WAS A LITTLE WORRIED WHEN YOU ELEVATED THE QUESTION CONCERNING THE SPLIT BETWEEN CITY AND ALSO REGION FINANCING AND ALSO THAT THAT HAS NOT YET BEEN RESOLVED.

WE ARE WORRIED THAT IN ACTION TO THE VARIATION OF THE FIRES, A LT OF PEOPLE HAVE RELOCATED FAR FROM THE CITY CENTERED AND THEY ARE TEMPTED TO SITUATE IN THE REGION. WE WISH TO NOT SEE THESE FUNDS ADVERTISED WITH THESE FUNDS. WE WANT TO SEE INDIVIDUALS RELOCATED BACK RIGHT INTO THE CITY AS CHILD AS POSSIBLE. THAT CONCERN THAT THAT HAS NOT BEEN FIXED BOTHERS US A LITTLE LITTLE BIT AS WELL AS WOULD LIKE TO OBTAIN IT SOLVED. THANK YOU. >> > > MANY THANKS. THAT ' S ALL THE ACADEMY– CARDS I HAVE AND WOULD LIKE TO BRING IT BACK TO COUNCIL.MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE$38.5 MILLION FOR MULTIFAMILY HOUSING IS FOR THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA. THERE IS A SEPARATE ALLOWANCE IF YOU WILL IF THE STATE'' S ACTIVITY STRATEGY SPECIFICALLY FOR SONOMA AREA, IS THAT CORRECT? >> > > THAT ' S CORRECT >>. >> > > THANK YOU. > > MR. McGLEN, YOU ARE REQUESTING FOR DIRECTION ON TWO PRODUCTS HERE, ONE IS THE CHOICE TO BE A SUBRECIPIENT FOR THE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING FUNDS $38.5 MILLION APPROXIMATELY, AND ALSO THE OTHER IS TO OFFER DIRECTION ON WHAT WE NEED TO BE ASKING FOR WITHIN THE ACTION PLAN ITSELF AND FOR THE FUTURE. I RECOGNIZE YOU'' VE BEEN TAKING NTES.I THINK THAT WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST IS THAT WE REQUEST WHAT WE BELIEVE IS THE UNMET REQUIREMENT IN SANTA ROSA AS WELL AS SIMPLY TO GET INFORMATION ONCE AGAIN, THAT UNMET REQUIRED AS DETERMINED BY OUR PROFESSIONAL THAT HAVE DONE A GREAT DEAL OF WORK WITH THIS CONCERN IS $300 MILLION, IS THAT CORRECT? >> > > THAT ' S THE FIGURE, YES, THAT ' S CORRECT. > > THEN THAT ' S WHAT WE MUST BE GOING AFTER. YOU UNDERSTAND, I KNOW THAT FUNDS ARE TIGHT ALL OVER, BUT WE HAVE AN UNMET REQUIREMENT. THE PROGRAMS ARE CREATED TO FILL THOSE UNMET DEMAND. SO LET'' S PURSUE EVERY PENNY THAT WE CANISTER FOR THE HOMEOWNERS OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. I WILL CERTAINLY SIMPLY FINISH MY OWN REMARKS HERE AND ALSO THAT'' S THAT I THINK WE NEED TO HAVE SUBRECIPIENTS ON THE MULTIFAMILY'FUNDS, I ' M FINE WITH THE STATE TACKLING THE OBLIGATION FOR THE SINGLE HOUSEHOLD RESIDENCE SECTION OF THIS AS WELL AS THE FACILITIES PART OF THIS. I THINK THAT THE FACILITIES PART IS CONCERN FULLY UNDERFUNDED– BUT HAVING A DIFFICULT TIME SEARCHING FOR FINANCING SOMEWHERE ELSE. SO I THINK FACILITIES WE ARE GOING TO NEED TO LOK AT THE NEXT ROUND. >> > > AT THE POINT OF CLARIFICATION, THE SUBRECIPIENT STANDING PROLONGS TO THE SMALL FACILITIES POT TOO. >> > > OH, I'' M SORRY. >> > > SO, WHAT I WOULD SIMPLY BE URGING IS THAT THAT BE BETTER DEFINED AND ALSO SHOW THE ACTUAL DAMAGES AS WELL AS IF IT'' S GOING TO BE TIED TO REAL ESTATE AS WELL AS REAL ESTATE SARTS THAT THAT BE REFLECTED LIKEWISE TO WAT WAS ALLOCATED IN THE MULTIFAMILY CONVERSATION. THAT'' S WHERE WE WISH TO HAVE SOME GUIDELINE TO THE STATE TO CONSIDER SANTA ROSA'' S PLACEMENT ON THE INFRASTRUCTURE SIDE NOT SIMPLY THE COUNTY.

>> > > OK. I WILL LET THE COUNCIL WEIGH IN NOW? >>> > COUNCILMEMBER TOM SCHWEDHELM: GIVING WHAT THE COUNCIL AS WELL AS INQUIRIES as well as remarks, YOU HAVE BEEN LIVING AND ALSO BREATHING THIS EVERYDAY. WHAT ELSE IS MISSING? >> > > I THINK THAT THIS IS AN IMPERFECT CONVERSATION. STAFF WILL CERTAINLY BE SURVEILLANCE HOW EXACTLY THE STATE EXECUTES THE SOLITARY HOUSEHOLD HOUSE PROGRAM AND ALSO WE'' LL BE REPORTING BACK TO THE COUNCIL FREQUENTLY BECAUSE WE PERHAPS REQUESTING CONSIDERATION FROM THE STATE DEPENDING O HOW THAT CREATES I REVISION.

SO WE ARE GING TO BE TIPPING FAR FROM THAT WHERE THERE IS PERSONNEL TIME AS WELL AS RESOURCES DEVOTED. AS I STATED EARLIER, WE TRUST FUND OUR PARTNERS, BUT WE NEED TO REMAIN IN THE VERIFICATION BUSINESS ALSO. >>> > > > MR. ROGERS? > >>VICE MAYOR CHRIS ROGERS: THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. DO WE HAVE ANY MOTION ON SIDEWALKS AND TREES BEING INCLUDED AS ELIGIBLE MEASURES IN INFRASTRUCTURE? >> > > AMONG THINGS THAT WE ARE GOING TO BE DEBUTING VERY SOON AND ALSO THE ADVERTISEMENT HOC, THE REBUILD AS WELL AS RECOVERY IS THE LITTLE SNEAK PEEK TO THIS IS THE DASHBOARD AROUND THOSE SPECIFIC PROBLEMS, THEY ARE STILL IN THE APPEALS PROCESS.

WE'' VE HAD A CONSTRUCTIVE CONVERSATION WITH FEMA. I WILL CERTAINLY STATE INSTRUCTIVE as well as positive, BUT I WON'' T SAY THAT IT HAS ANY BEARING ON THE LAST RESOLUTION. THOSE ARE STILL AS WELL AS AN APPELLANT SETTING AT THIS POINT. >> > > SO THE$300 MILLION THAT THE MAYOR PRICED ESTIMATE, DOES THAT CONSIST OF TREES as well as sidewalks? >> > > YES, IT DOES INCLUDE THAT. >> > > GREAT. AFTER THAT I'' M FULLY SUPPORTIVE OF BOTH OF THE SUBRECIPIENT CONDITION ALONG WITH ADING THE EXTRA FUNDS. >> > > MS. COMBS? OMBS BRUSH– >>> > COUNCILMEMBER JULIE COMBS: THANKS. DOES THIS CONSIST OF ALSO THE LAND FILL OR ANY ONE OF THE MITIGATION PROGRAMS THAT WE MIGHT HAVE BEEN DISCUSSING? >> > > ONCE AGAIN, THE GARBAGE DUMP IS SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE TO EVALUATE. WE CAN CONSIDER THAT AND BRING IT BACK FOR FUTURE CONVERSATION. AS I STATED BEFORE, THE LAST CONVERSATIONS HAD BEEN INVOLVING THE STATE AND WE'' LL PROVIDE AN UPDATE TO COUNCIL, AND AFTER THAT AS WE GET CLOSER TO THE MITIGATION MONIES, OBVIOUSLY THERE IS GOING TO BE ANOTHER ACTION PLAN THAT'' S REQUIRED OF THE MITIGATION AS WELL AS THERE ARE SOME SUBJECTS TO THE CONVERSATION TO BE HAD O THAT FINANCING SWIMMING POOL.

>> > > WITHIN HOUSING, OUR UNMET DEMAND IN REAL ESTATE ALONE WAS $97 MILLION. I'' M HAVING DIFFICULTY SEEING WHAT IS BEING USED, I'' M SEEING $138.4 MILLION FOR MULTIFAMILY. IS THAT WHERE THE SPACE IS. THE $97 OF THE $38.4, HOW DO I INCLUDE THE HOUSING PROGRAM IN TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE SPACE THERE? SO WE THINK WE HAVE A $97 MILLION NEED AND ALSO I'' M NOT SEEING HOW TO ARRIVE? >> > > SO THE$97 MILLION IS USING THE HUD APPROACH. WE HAVE A MULTIPLIER IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER TO USE AGAINST THE COMPLETE OF THE GROUPS TO DETERMINE THAT NUMBER.

THAT'' S THE UNMET NEED. HOW THE $38 MILLION IS ALLOCATE REMAINS IN THE ACTION PLAN. >> > > SO, FOR OWNER OCCUPIED REAL ESTATE DO I SUBTRACT THE $38 FROM THE 97? >> > > I THINK YOU COULD DO THAT BUT THIS IS AN ON GOING DISCUSSION. I UNDERSTAND THE CONSULTING TEAMS WITH THE COUNTYING AND ALSO– REGION AND THE CITY HAD A DISCUSSION. WE WOULD LOVE TO COME BACK TO CRAFT A DECLARATION ABOUT THAT NEED THAT WE'' LL SHOW COUNCIL, BUT IN ITS TOTALITY, THIS IS AN ITERATIVE PROCEDURES AND THE FIRST STAB AT IT IS TO REACH THE $300 MILLION MARKER AS WELL AS POSSIBLY WIDEN THE ASK. I ASSUME THOSE ARE COMPONENT OF THE DISCUSSIONS THAT ARE GOING TO DEMAND TO UNFOLD. >> > > WE MAKE SURE NOT THE ONLY ENTITY THAT HAS BEEN SIGNIFICANTLY MISS UNDER ESTIMATED. >> > > I ASSUME ONCE ONCE MORE AS YOU HEARD THIS MID-DAY EARLIER, THE NATURE OF HOW FEMA DOES ITS COMPUTATION ON FLOOD AS WELL AS STORM IS THE MOST PROFICIENT METHODS OF DOING COMPANY FOR THEM. WE ARE PLAYING CATCH UP AND ALSO THIS COMMUNITY UNFORTUNATELY IS SETTING THE REQUIREMENT THROUGH WHICH OTHER COMMUNITIES ARE GOING TO BE ABLE TO MAKE THE MOST OF WHAT WE HAVE DISCOVERED IN THE EXPERIENCES THAT WE'' VE BROUGHT TO THE TABLE.

>> > > SO IT REALLY BEHOVES US TO ACCOMPLISH IT EXTREMELY WELL FOR INDIVIDUAL THAT ARE ADHERING TO IN OUR UNFORTUNATE STEPS. >> > > ABSOLUTELY. >> > > I AM NEUTRAL ON WHETHER THE EMPTY REAL ESTATE PROGRAM NEED TO BE RUN BY THE STATE OR OTHERWISE. THAT'' S PENALTY. I LIKE THAT THE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROGRAM WOULD BE CITY GO FOR LEAST TO CONSIST OF POGRAMS FROM THE HOUSING AUTHORITY. IT'' S THE REAL ESTATE AUTHORITY ' S CHOICE, I THINK WE NEED TO HAVE INPUT FROM THE HOUSING AUTHORITY. IS IT FEASIBLE UNDER THE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROGRAM TO INCLUDE LITTLE RESIDENCE VILLAGES OR SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THAT? >> > > BRIEFLY YES, IF WE CONTAINER DESCRIBE WHAT OUR PRIORITIES MIGHT BE. >> > > OK, I ASSUME IT MAY BE A GREAT CONCEPT. AND ONCE AGAIN I INTEND TO BE CLEAR THAT WE NEED TO HAVE CLEARNESS ON IF THE ALLOTMENT IS GOING TO THE COUNTY FOR FACILITIES OR NOT.

AND WHAT'' S CMING TO THE CITY. THE CITY HAS CONSIDERABLE INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIRES SEPARATE FROM THE REGION'' S INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS. AS WELL AS I WEAR'' T KNOW, THIS MILLION DOESN ' T EVEN ACQUIRE United States A MILE OF ROAD. THANKS. >>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: MR. SCHWEDHELM? >> > > THANKS, IF I TIN SIMPLY GET CLARITY. MR. MAYOR, I HEARD YOU SAY TWO DIFFERENT THINGS AND ITHOUGHT THERE WERE 3 THINGS, THE ONE, $38 MILLION AS WELL AS $2.5 MILLION AND DIFFERENT REMARKS AS WELL AS THIS AMOUNT AS WELL AS THE $300 MILLION RECOGNIZED INCLUDED TO YOUR RECORD, AM I PROPER SINCE I WILL BE PRODUCTION THOSE ACTIVITIES? >> > > PERSONNEL WOULD BE REALLY COMFORTABLE WITH THAT MOVEMENT.

>> > > THOSE 3. OKAY, AS WELL AS DAVE, WAS THE PROJECT NAMED? >> > > I THINK AMONG THEM IS SUPPORTIVE REAL ESTATE. ARE ANY OF THE OTHERS FOR HELPFUL HOUSING? I'' M BELIEVING WITH THE WARMTH FINANCING AND ALSO COUNCIL MEMBER COMBS AS WELL AS I WILL CERTAINLY BE HAVING THAT DISCUSSION AND ALSO THERE IS SOME CROSSROADS THAT I BELIEVE WE'' LL BE COMPLETING WITH THIS. >> > > ONE OF THE TASKS THAT IS CONSIDERED TO BE ENCOURAGING REAL ESTATE. THERE ARE SOME UNITS PROPOSED TO BE ALLOT AT RIDGE POINT TO BE THE SAME. AGAIN WITH THE NVA FINANCING SCHEDULE AS WELL AS IF THAT WAS AUTHORIZED BY COUNCIL FOR EVEN MORE ECONOMICAL REAL ESTATE, WE WILL MAKE THAT KNOWN TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

>> > > SO, AGAIN, RELATIVELY SHORT IN 6 YEARS TO SPEND THIS CASH, EXIST VARIOUS OTHER SUPPORTIVE PROGRAMS IN REAL ESTATE IN THE PIPELINE THAT ARE NOT HERE? >> > > NOT TO MY KNOWLEDGE. >> > > OK, MANY THANKS. THAT'' S ALL I HAVE FOR NOW. >>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: MR. TIBBETS? >>> > COUNCILMEMBER JACK TIBBETTS: THANKS, MAYOR, I SAY SORRY, IF ANYBODY FROM HUD HERE TONIGHT? >> > > NO. >> > > I DESIRE TO SAY THANK YOU. IT ISN'' T DAY-TO-DAY THAT $38.5 MILLION GOES DOWN RIGHT INTO YOUR HOME FOR AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE. THIS IS A BIG REQUIREMENT.

> > I TOUGHT CDBG DR INCLUDED DURABILITY AS WELL AS FACILITIES. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: I ' M GOING TO CALL THIS CONFERENCE BACK TO ORDER.WE HAVE A WHOLE LOT OF ITEMS ON THE SCHEDULE AND ALSO A GREAT DEAL TO OBTAIN THROUGH. > > THANK YOU. > > AFTER THAT THAT ' S WHAT WE SHOULD BE GOING AFTER. > > > MR. ROGERS?I WANT TO THANK YOU YOU SIR, FROM HCS WHICH IS AN ON GOING PROBLEM IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. $98 MILLION IS NOT A SMALL QUANTITY FOR HOUSING. IF WE CONTINUE IN THAT PIPELINE, WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A NOTICEABLE PIPE.

I ASSUME THAT OVER ARCHING OBJECTIVE WILL CERTAINLY BE WHAT THIS COUNCIL STRIVES TO DO AS WELL AS ALTHOUGH THIS IS A NEW ACCOMPLISHMENT FOR THIS COUNCIL. IF WE DEMAND TO SUPPLEMENT THAT QUANTITY, WE WILL CERTAINLY NEED TO DO THAT AND ALSO LOOK AT A FEW OF THE HEEDE FUNDS TO GUARANTEE WE ARE NOT HAVING AN OVERLAP ON FINANCING. IT APPEARS TO ME TO BE AN POSSIBLE OBJECTIVE. AS FOR THE FUNDING, I WISH TO SEE United States EMPHASIS ON MULTIFAMILY REAL ESTATE. SOMEHOW WE ARE GOING TO ATTAIN THE A LOT OF UNITS BUILT AND ALSO GET THE VERY BEST ROI FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD MATCH DOLLARS WE ARE ADVANCING.

WHEN IT COMES TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, I WOULD REALLY HUMBLY DEMAND TO THE STATE THAT THEY DO PROVIDE EVEN MORE ASSISTANCE NOT TO JUST THIS NEIGHBORHOOD BUT OTHER COMMUNITIES THAT ARE THROUGHOUT THE STATE THAT ARE CALAMITY RAVAGED. I WANT TO REMIND EVERYBODY THAT THE STATE HAS A $13 BILLION GET FR DISASTERS. I HOPE THAT SINCE WE BECOME PART OF THEIR TERRITORY THEY WILL TAKE THAT RIGHT INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN WE ASK FOR THAT ADDITIONAL UNMET REQUIREMENT. I JUST DESIRED TO THANK THE FOLKS FOR PUTTING THIS WITH EACH OTHER, THE PROFESSIONALS, THIS IS GOING TO BE GOOD FOR SANTA ROSA. >>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: M. SCHWEDHELM, YOU DO THIS ITEM AND ALSO I WILL CERTAINLY PLACE IT IN YOUR LAP. >>> > COUNCILMEMBER TOM SCHWEDHELM: PERMIT ME TO START WITH THE FIRST OE WHERE I WILL COME WITH THE MOVEMENT THAT THE CITY APPROVE THIS CONDITION FOR THE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING AND THE FEMA FRAMEWORK FUNDING RESOURCE BASED ON THEIR ACTIVITY STRATEGY. >> > > SECOND >>. > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: DO WE REQUIREMENT TO BALLOT ON EACH OF THESE, MS. GALLAGHER? >> > > THAT WOULD BE THE A LOT OF HELPFUL TO VOTE INDIVIDUALLY. >> > > YOUR BALLOT, PLEASE >>. > > THAT PASSES ALL >>. > > I MAKE ANOTHER PERSON ACTIVITY TO ACCEPT, BASICALLY TO ACCEPT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA HOUSING AND ALSO COMMUNITY ADVANCEMENT DIVISION'' S DRAFT ACTIVITY PLAN AS IT CONCERNS TE CITY OF SANTA ROSA AS WELL AS FINANCING COMING TO OUR JURISDICTION.

>> > > SECONDLY >>. > > IS THAT OPEN AFTER THAT TO A FUTURE AMENDMENT AS STATED? >> > > I ASSUME YOU MIGHT INTEND TO INCLUDE THAT. >> > > WOULD YOU AS A PLEASANT MODIFICATION CONSIDER WITH FEASIBLE FUTURE AENDMENTS? >> > > WITH THE EXPECTED FUTURE CHANGES? >> > > ANOTHER PERSON QUESTION, MR. TIBBETS? >>> > COUNCILMEMBER JACK TIBBETTS: I JUST HAD A QUICK COMMENT. IT DOESN'' T NEED TO BE AN MODIFICATION. I'' M HAPPY THE STATE IS GOING TO BE ADD M– ADMINISTERING THIS $38.5 MILLION AND FOR THE PROCEDURES AND ALSO LOOKING AT IT TOO IN PERSONAL ORGANIZER, IT WAS A FANTASTIC EXPERIENCE.

JUST A FRIENDLY IDEA. >>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: WE HAVE An ACTIVITY AND ALSO A SECONDLY. YOUR BALLOTS, PLEASE. WAS THAT CLEAR TO TEAM? >> > > I LEARNT THROUGH COUNCIL MEMBER TIBBETS. I ' M NOT TAKING THAT AS An ACTIVITY TODAY BUT AS COMMENTS. > > YOUR VOTES. THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. AFTER THAT MAKE A MOTION THAT WE DRAFT A LETTER ASKING FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA'' S REAL ESTATE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TO INCREASE THE FINANCING FOR THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA BASED ON OUR HAGGERTY REPORT AS WELL AS THE PROCESSES CONSISTED OF WITHIN THAT RECORD. >> > > I WOULD IMPULSE, I ASSUME WHAT I WOULD SAY IS URGING THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN EVEN MORE THAN JUST HCD TO PURSUE ADDED FINANCING IN SUPPORT OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA BASED ON OUR UNMET NEED RECORD.

>> > > EXACTLY WHAT I WAS GOING TO SAY. >> > > SECONDLY >>. > > [LUGHTER]>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: YOUR BALLOTS, PLEASE. THAT PASSES ALL. THANKS ALL QUITE. >> > > MR. McGLEN, 14.2. ITEM 14.2. REPORT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH SONOMA COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE DISTRICT AS WELL AS SCJCD ASSOCIATED TRAINEES FOR CITY BUS LIMITLESS GAIN ACCESS TO PASS PROGRAM FOR SANTA ROSA JUNIOR UNIVERSITY PUPILS. TRANSIT PLANNER PROVIDING. >> > > MANY THANKS, COUNCIL, GOOD EVENING. I ' M THE TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR FOR THE TRANSIT DIVISION WITH PUBLIC FUNCTIONS. WE ' LL BE HERE PRIOR TO YOU THIS EVENING ON THIS ISSUE. THE TRAINEES IN 2017 PASSED A STUDENT TRANSPORT FEE TO SPEND FOR UNLIMITED TRANSPORTATION RIDERSHIP PROGRAMS WITHIN THE SONOMA AREA TRANSIT. >> > > PULL TAT MICROPHONE DOWN SIMPLY A LITTLE LITTLE BIT.

>> > > MANY THANKS, SIR. WHEN BOARDING THE BUS, the SRJC NOW HAS AGREEMENTS IN PLACE FOR TO NOT ONLY USAGE THE CITY BUS AND PETALUMA TRANSPORTATION BY SHOGAN SRJC TO THE CHAUFFEUR. FOR THE FALL 2018 AND– THE RECOMMENDED MOU WOULD START A NEW AGREEMENT MOVING THE PROGRAM OUT OF ITS PILOT PHASE AND EXTEND THE PROGRAM ADVANTAGES TO THE STUDENTS WITH JUNE 2020. WITH AN APPROXIMATED EARNINGS OF $194,000 FOR CITY BUS AT $0.84 PER RIDE. THIS IS BROKEN OUT INTO ABOUT $59,000 FOR SPRING, 2019, AND SPRING 2020 SEMESTERS AND ALSO $17,000 FOR THE SUMMERTIME 2019-SEMESTER.

IF RIDERSHIP EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS, WE ANTICIPATE A MAXIMUM LOSS REVENUE BY THE CITY TO BE $25,000. THAT BEING SAID, THAT'' S OUR JC PUPIL TRANSPORT FUND MAY HAVE AN UNOBLIGATED EARNINGS AND THE CITY PERHAPS ABLE TO GET COMPENSATION FOR ADDITIONAL RIDES. THIS IS DISPLAYING 2 PIECES OF INFO. THE RIDERSHIP ON 3 ENDLESS and present PASS PROGRAMS, THE VTERAN RIDERSHIP PROGRAM THAT COUNCIL LAUNCHED? JULY 2018 THAT IS AVERAGING CONCERNING 630 TRIPS PER WEEK, AND ALSO THE PARATRANSIT UNLIMITED GAIN ACCESS TO PROGRAM. BECAUSE OF THEIR ABILITY CONTAINER NOT RIDE, THIS IS A PROGRAM FOR INDIVIDUALS QUALIFIED TO RIDE THE PROGRAM. THIS IS CONSIDERED THE VERY BEST METHOD AND ALSO OFFERS CYCLISTS A LOW SET YOU BACK OF JOURNEY OPTION WHILE LOWERING ALL OVERALL EXPENSE. THIS IS ABOUT 1,000 WEEKLY. FINALLY THE SEMESTERS IN WHICH THE LIMITLESS PROGRAM HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.

YOU CAN SEE THAT IN FALL 2017, WE ARE AT ABOUT 2500 RIDERS A WEEK AND I AUTUMN 2018, WE GO TO 4500 RIDES EACH WEEK. THE ADVANTAGES OF THE PROGRAM CONSIST OF DECREASING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. IT'' S ONE OF THE OBJECTIVES WITHIN THE CITY ' S CLIMATE ACTION STRATEGY. IT GIVES THE UNIVERSITY THE CAPACITY TO GIVE ACCESS TO EDUCATIONAL SERVICES TO A FEW OF THE COUNTIES A LOT OF ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS, RISES STUDENT GAIN ACCESS TO TO THE CAMPUS AS WELL AS AIDS RECRUIT AS WELL AS KEEP TRAINEES AND REDUCES THE OVERALL COST TO RIDE TO J C. THE RIDERSHIP PROGRAM HAS INCLUDED A 5% INCREASE AT THE BUS STOPS. LASTLY IT IS ADVISED BY THE TRANSPORTATION AS WELL AS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT COUNCIL BY RESOLUTION APPROVE THE MOU WITH THE SONOMA COUNTY JUNIOR UNIVERSITY DISTRICT AND ALSO THE SCJCD CONNECTED TRAINEES ESTABLISHING THE CITY BUS UNLIMITED PASS PROGRAM FOR SANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE STUDENTS VIA JUNE 30, 2020. THANKS AND ALSO WE ARE PREPARED TO ANSWER ANY INQUIRIES. ALSO THE DEPUTY SUPERVISOR RACHEL IS AVAILABLE. >> > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: EXCELLENT, THANK YOU QUITE. ANY QUESTIONS? MR. ROGERS? >>> > VICE MAYOR CHRIS ROGERS: THANK YOU, A REALLY QUICK QUESTION, WE SPOKE WHEN IMPLEMENTING THIS PROGRAM THAT GIVING OTHERS ACCESS TO RIDE COULD RISE OUR FEDERAL FUNDING BECAUSE IT INCREASES RIDERSHIP.

WITH THIS 5% RISE WITH THE STOPS AS WELL AS THE RIDERSHIP GOING UP, HAVE WE ATUALLY SEEN AN RISE IN FEDERAL FUNDING COMING IN BECAUSE OF THIS? >> > > THE FEDERAL FINANCING WILL DO NOT HAVE A YEAR OR SO WITH THE DATA AS WELL AS WHEN YOUR RIDERSHIP DIPS. WE DID EXPLORE THAT QUESTION A LITTLE BIT AND ALSO CONSIDERED THE FORMULA. THE PATH OF MILES TRAVELED YOU GET THAT BY INCREASING YOUR HIDE– RIDERSHIP. WE ARE SO SMALL. IF LA CITY HAS A 1% RIDERSHIP BOOST, THAT'' S GOING TO HAVE A FAR GREATER EFFECT IN OUR APPROPRIATION THAN ANYTHING THAT WE CONTAINER DO AT THAT TYPE OF LOWER PORTION DEGREE. I BELIEVE IN GENERAL, WE WOULD ANTICIPATE THIS ENHANCE TO OBTAIN CLEANED INTO, YOU UNDERSTAND, THE FEDERAL DISTRIBUTION OF FINANCES THROUGHOUT THE NATION. THAT STATED, THERE ARE VARIOUS OTHER FUNDING PROGRAMS WE HAVE WHERE RIDERSHIP IS A VARIABLE AND RISES OUR PRODUCT ACTIVITY IN STIPULATIONS OF PASSENGERS PER HOUR AND IT DOES HLP US WITH A NUMBER OF OUR FUNDING PROGRAMS TO HAVE A RIDE SHIP INCREASE SUCH AS WE ARE SEEING FROM THIS PROGRAM.

>> > > UNDERSTANDING THAT YOU ARE NOT A RESEARCH INSTITUTION, HAVE WE ATTEMPTED TO MEASURE IN ANY WAY INCREASE IN DOLLARS VERSUS BEING SPENT? >> >'> I ' M UNCERTAIN I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN. > > COMPONENT OF THE REASON WHERE I ASK IS WHERE ARE THE BOOSTS FOR VARIOUS OTHER LOCATIONS BASED ON DOLLARS FOR RIDERSHIP, WE'OBVIOUSLY WE ' VE LOOKED AT VETERANS, PUPILS, PARATRANSIT, I'' M INTERESTED IF WE CONTAINER SHOW THROUGH SOME INFORMATION WHETHER O NOT ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS IN PUBLIC TRANSIT THAT LOWER THE OVERALL COST ACTUALLY OFFSETS ITSELF IN TAKING IN ADDITIONAL DOLLARS FROM OTHER SOURCES? >> > > SURE, SO WE CONTAINER CHECK OUT THAT MORE GLOBALLY OVER OUR FINANCING SOURCES.

OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD AS WELL AS I PUT ON'' T WANT TO SPECULATE ALSO MUCH BUT I ASSUME THE CARE IN THAT IS FOR OUR BIG FINANCING SOURCES LIKE FEDERAL FINANCES AS WELL AS TDA FROM THE STATE. THERE ARE VARIOUS OTHER MOTORISTS THAT ARE FUNDING GREATER THAN OUR RIDERSHIP. FOR INSTANCE, TDA IS BASED ON SALES TAX. WHAT'' S HAPPENING IN THIS AREA WITH SALES TAX OBLIGATION INVOICES IS GOING TO HAVE A FAR BETTER INFLUENCE. MAYBE REALLY CHALLENGING TO SHOT TO IMPACT OUR RIDERSHIP ON SEVERAL OF THESE FUNDING SOURCES. HAPPY TO APPEARANCE AT THAT BEYOND FEDERAL FUNDS. WE DID DIG RATHER FAR AND WE HAD OTHERS TAKE A LOOK AT IT AND ALSO THE RESPONSES WAS WE ARE SMALL POTATOES AND ALSO WITH THESE BIG WORKFLOW SUCH AS SAN FRANCISCO AND CHICAGO, IT CONTAINER BE BIG. WE CANISTER RETURN TO YOU WITH AN SOLUTION. >> > > WITH THE CAUTION THAT I KNOW THAT THERE IS AN INNATE VALUE TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND THERE DOESN'' T NEED TO BE A DOLLARS FOR DOLLARS CONTRAST BUT THE ADDITIONAL CHATTING CONCERNING THE RELEVANCE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IF WE CONTAINER PROGRAM THAT.

>> > > SURE. >> THANK YOU. > > CANISTER WE EXPLAIN OR CAN YOU REMIND ME HOW A TRAINEE TRANSPORT FEE FEATURES? >> > > IM GOING TO ALLOW HIM EXPLAIN THAT. >> > >'IT ' S ADOLLAR FOR EVERY DEBT. A $10 FEE FOR STUDENTS. IF THEY ARE TAKING 3 LEVELS, DEGREES, IT'' S A $10 CHARGE. > >> DID YOU STATE IT'' S A NET COST TO THE CITY? ARE WE GETTING $25,000 OR LOSING $ 25,000. I GOT LOST ON THE DETAILS HIGHWAY WITH THE TEAM RECORD. I TYPE OF GOT LOST IN THE NUMBERS.

>> > > DEFINITELY. WE'' VE TRIED TO QUOTE, WE HAVE AN AVERAGE FARE BOX REVENUE. SO IT'' S TOTAL INCOME THAT WE TAKE IN DIVIDED BY OVERALL RIDERS. THAT'' S ABOUT THAT $0.84,$0.83. THAT'' S WHAT WE ARE SEEING IT EXPENSE. JUST HOW MUCH CASH WE TAKE IN FOR EVERY RIDER. THAT'' S WHAT WE ARE CHARGING THE SRJC. BY OUR COMPUTATION AND PRICE QUOTES OF VARIETY OF RIDERS, WE'' VE IDENTIFIED A CEILING OF $59,000 FOR A SEMESTER IS WHAT SRJC WILL PAY US BECAUSE THEY HAVE A LIMITED AMOUNT O FUNDS.

WE MAY GIVE EVEN MORE TRIPS THAN WHAT $59,000 WILL PAY FOR AND ALSO THAT'' S A POTENTIAL LOSS OF INCOME. > > THE BUSES ARE STILL RELOCATING. THE STUDENTS ARE OBTAINING WHERE THEY REQUIRED AS WELL BIG AND ALSO– TO GO AS WELL AS THIS IS An ESTIMATION. IT'' S RALLY HRD TO PULL SOMETHING BACK WHEN A PROGRAM REMAINS IN AREA AND ALSO PEOPLE ADJUST IT. TO SEE SOMETHING AS POSITIVE OF THIS. I WISHED TO LOOK AT THE SUSTAINABILITY OF THIS PROGRAM. >> > > TO COMMENT, IF RIDERSHIP PROCEEDS AT THE CURRENT AND PLATEAUED THE FINANCIAL DANGER THE FINANCIAL LOSS IS ABOUT $9,000 FOR THE PROFITS WE WOULDN'' T OBTAIN PER CYCLIST. THE RIDERSHIP PROCEEDS TO RISE IF WE HAVEN'' T PLATEAUED. ONE POINT TO KEEP AN EYE ON IS WE HAVE OBTAIN THE FINANCING AND ALSO FOR THIS FINANCING. IF WE OBTAIN TO THE POINT OF THIS FALL WHERE WE REMAIN TO SEE THIS RIDERSHIP RISE, WE COULD DEVELOP INTO THAT GRANT PROGRAM OF PIECE TO ASSISTANCE THIS PROGRAM T BE MADE WHOLE WITH THE ENHANCEMENT OF THOSE GRANT FUNDS. WHEN I CONSIDER THIS OVERALL FINANCIAL POINT OF VIEW IN STIPULATIONS OF OUR PRICE PROFITS, THERE ARE VARIOUS OTHER RESOURCES WE CANISTER POTENTIALLY LEVERAGE TO ADD WHAT THE JC CANISTER GIVE.

I BELIEVE IT IS EXTREMELY LOW THREAT. >> > > I APPRECIATE THAT AS WELL AS THE IMAGINATION OF YOUR DIVISION BECAUSE THAT IS CLEARLY WHAT IT REQUIRES TO RUN A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. THANK YOU. >>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: MR. TIBBETS? >>> > COUNCILMEMBER JACK TIBBETTS: THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. I SEEM TO REMEMBER WITH THIS WAS CONCERNING COUNCIL ABOUT A YEAR AGO. THERE WAS DISCUSSION LARGELY ROUND HEADED BY THE TO P AND ALSO THE RIDERSHIP. IS THERE ANY CONVERSATIONS TAKING PLACE WITH THE MANAGEMENT OF THE INSTITUTION ITSELF AS WELL AS HOW THEY ACCEPTED A SELF IMPOSED CHARGE TO MAKE THAT TAKE PLACE AND ALSO IS THERE AN PASSION TO DO THIS WITH K- 12 SCHOOLS. AND ALSO CONSIDERING THE POSSIBLE BENEFIT AND ALSO WHAT I FIND OUT ABOUT INEXPENSIVE HOUSING AND WHAT ABOUT TRAFFIC. THIS IS STRAIGHT RUNNING VERSUS RAISING WEB TRAFFIC. IT'' S A FANTASTIC PROGRAM. > >> YEAH, WE SANCTUARY'' T HAD ANY CURRENT CONVERSATIONS WITH THE INSTITUTION DISTRICT ABOUT THAT. I UNDERSTAND THAT'' S BEEN SOMETHING'THAT ' S BEEN OF PASSION TO THE AREA AS WELL AS COUNCIL FOR A LONG TIME AND ALSO IT ' S CERTAINLY WE WOULD MORE THAN HAPPY TO WRK ON AS WELL AS CONSIDER AS WELL AS WE WOULD MORE THAN HAPPY TO GET TO OUT TO THE SCHOOL AREA TO SEE IF THERE ARE ANY POSSIBILITIES TO RELOCATE THAT CONVERSATION FORWARD.I THINK IT '

S ALSO SOMETHING WE CANISTER WATCH ON FOR CREATIVE WAYS TO FUND. RIGHT NOW WE ARE SIMPLY DRAWING OURSELVES OUT OF OUR OWN FINANCIAL CHALLENGES. WE ARE GETTING BACK TO A POINT IN WHICH WE MAY BE ABLE TO THINK A LITTLE BIT EVEN MORE CREATIVELY ABOUT HOW TO GET SOMETHING LIKE THAT DONE. SO I'' M DELIGHTED TO DO THAT AS WELL AS TRICK YOU PUBLISHED. >> > > MANY THANKS >>. > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: OTHER QUESTIONS? I THINK THIS IS A TERRIFIC PROGRAM.I DON '

T MEAN THIS CONCERN TO TAKE ANYTHING FAR FROM IT AT ALL, BUT CAN ANY ONE OF THIS ADDITIONAL RIDERSHIP BE CREDITED TO INCREASING HEAD WAYS AND RELOCATING BUSES ALONG ENCINO OPPORTUNITY? >> > > YOU UNDERSTAND, IT CERTAINLY COULD. WE PROVIDED A HIGHER TOP QUALITY OF SOLUTION BECAUSE HALLWAY. SHORTLY BEFORE THIS PROGRAM WAS SET UP AND THAT'' S BEEN A REALLY GREAT HARMONY AND ALSO GREAT POINT WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO OFFER THE SANTA ROSA UNIVERSITY STUDENT FOR THEM GIVING THIS PROFITS FOR UNLIMITED ACCESSIBILITY. ONE POINT THAT IS REALLY INTERESTING AS WELL AS I WILL CERTAINLY LIKEWISE CLAIM THIS, IT'' S A LITTLE HARD TO AFTER THAT TRACK THE IMPACTS SINCE WE'' VE TRANSFORMED THE WHOLE SYSTEM IN THE CENTER OF ALL THIS, BUT WHEN WE CONSIDER THE BUS QUITS AROUND THE JUNIOR COLLEGE AS WELL AS SEE THIS 5 PERCENT RISE FOR SEPTEMBER, YEAR OVER YEAR COMPARED TO WHAT WE HAD COMPARED TO DECEMBER 17TH TO WHEN THIS PROGRAM WAS SET UP, YOU RECOGNIZE, I ASSUME, WHAT I SEE IS THE POOR INCREASE PARTLY SINCE OF THE FIRE CALAMITY, WE HAD ABOUT A 6% REDUCTION IN RIDERSHIP.IF WE ARE SEEING AN BOOST IN THOSE BUS STOPS IN THE JC VICINITY, WHEN SYSTEM WIDE WE ' VE HAD A REDUCTION, YOU UNDERSTAND, THAT ' S TELLING ME THERE IS PROBABLY ANOTHER THING HAPPENING THERE IN WHICH THE BENEFIT OF THE FREE RIDES IS ENCOURAGING ADDITIONAL RIDERSHIP BEYOND WHAT WE HAVE SYSTEM WIDE. SO, I CAN ' T GIVE YOU A FORENSIC RESPONSE TO THAT,'BUT THAT ' S KIND OF WHAT YOU SEE FROM THE INFORMATION'. > > O.K., THERE WASN ' T ANY DATA. >> ARTICLE TO IMAGINE TOTALLY FREE RIDES THAT SHOWED ANY UP PARTICULAR AT– UP TICK? > > I WILL CERTAINLY STATE TO THE NEW SYSTEM ON THAT PARTICULAR PASSAGE. IT'' S BEEN INTERESTING BECAUSE WE IMPLEMENTED THIS IN MAY OF 2016. IF THE SUMMER AND ALSO WE HAD THE SCHOOL OPEN FOR A FEW MONTHS AND ALSO AFTER THAT THE FIRES AND CURRENTLY THE RIDERSHIP IN OCTOBER, back. CURRENTLY WE CONTAINER OBTAIN BACK TO MAKE A REPUTABLE CONTRAST TO MAKE AND ALSO WHAT WE ARE SEEING IS POSITIVE. WHAT I'' M SEEING IN OCTOBER 2018, IS AGOOD LEVEL AS WELL AS THAT'' S A GOOD IDEA BECAUSE THE DESCENDING ON THE RIDERSHIP THROUGHOUT THE BAY AREAS IS WHAT WE ARE SEING.

THE EXISTING MOTORCYCLIST WAS BRING ABOUT 10,000 A MONTH AND NOW 30,000 BIKERS A MONTH. WE ARE DUPLICATING THE HONOR ON THAT PARTICULAR CORRIDOR FOR SURE. TO MAKE SURE THAT'' S VERY CLEAR. >> > > DESPITE THE FACTORS, THIS IS A SUCCESS STORY. I HAVE A CARD HERE FROM ROBERT. PUBLIC AUDIO SPEAKER: MAYOR COURSEY, COUNCIL, IT'' S An ENJOYMENT TO BE HERE TONITE TO SAY THANK YOU FOR THE PARTNERSHIP. MY NAME IS ROBERT, THE DEAN OF PUPILS, SRJC, IT'' S BEEN An ENJOYMENT TO WORK WITH RACHEL AND ALSO URI. THIS IS ONE OF THE FAVORABLE THINGS THAT STUDENTS ARE FIRED UP ABOUT. ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND THE STAFF, THANK YOU. I WALK ROUGHLY as well as universities GREATER THAN 10% OF THE STUDENTS ARE THANKFUL AS WELL AS FOR THE A LOT OF AT RISK PUPILS, THIS I THE REASON THEY REMAIN IN INSTITUTION USING THIS TO AND FRO TO USE TE CITY BUS, AND ALSO WE ALSO HAVE A PROGRAM WITH COUNTY.IT ' S A

WIN VICTORY. IT'' S LOWERING OUR CARBON FOOTPRINT AS WELL AS DECREASING SPACES IN OUR AUTO PARKING LOTS. THANKS FOR YOUR COLLABORATION AND FOR YOUR SUPPORT OF THIS MOU. >>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: THANK YOU. MORE QUESTIONS OR REMARKS? MR. TIBBETS? THIS IS YOUR THING? >>> > COUNCILMEMBER JACK TIBBETTS: I RELOCATE THE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH SONOMA AREA JUNIOR COLLEGE DISTRICT AND ALSO SCJCD CONNECTED TRAINEES AS WELL AS WAVE FURTHER READING OF THE MESSAGE. >> > > SECONDLY >>. > > BALLOTS? THAT PASSES ALL. THANKS SIGNIFICANTLY. MOVING ON FROM THE I DIDN'' T THINK– YING TO THE YANG. >> > > 14.3 RECORD, SUSPEND PARK SMART SHUTTLE BUS ON MARCH 1, 2019, AND ALSO USAGE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES TO CONNECTING DOWNTOWN SMART STATION AND RAILWAY SQUARE WITH DOWNTOWN AND CITY AUTO PARKING GARAGES. >> > > EXCELLENT EVENING, ONCE AGAIN, COUNCIL. TRANSIT COORDINATOR FOR THE TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION WITH PUBLIC FUNCTIONS. PRIOR TO THE INITIATION OF CLEVER TRAINS, CITY OF SANTA ROSA WRE IMPLEMENTING THE LAST MILE SOLUTIONS TO SUPPLY THE PUBLIC GAIN ACCESS TO TO THE WISE TRAIN.

COUNCIL INITIATED A FLOWED SHUTTLE BUS FOR THE EXPENSES OF $180,000. WHAT WE PHONE CALL THE PARK SMART SHUTTLE BUS BEGAN SERVICE DECEMBER 13TH, ALMOST 1 YEAR AGO. FOR THOSE THAT HAVEN'' T RIDDEN THE SERVICE, IT OPERATES TWICE AN HR FROM THE START OF SMART SOLUTION FROM 420:20:20 A.M. UNTIL 9:30 P.M. WITH GAPS OUTSIDE COMMUTER HOURS WHILE ALSO PROVIDING SOME INSURANCE COVERAGE DURING THE LUNCH HOURS. IT HAS 6 STOPS. THE SHUTTLE BUS IS THE SOUTH AND NORTHBOUND AS WELL AS MAKES CERTAIN THEY FULFILL THE SOUTHBOUND TRAIN WHILE OFFERING CONNECTIONS TO THE SOUTHBOUND TRAIN. THE SERVICE WAS BRANDED AS PARK SMART. STAFF HAS ACTUALLY TAKEN PART IN THE REGIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD MARKETING PLAN. THE LOGO DESIGN GOES TO EACH BUS QUIT. THERE ARE BANNERS AT GARAGE ONE AS WELL AS 12. THE MAJOR PARKING LOT AT THE ENTRYWAY.

WITH THE BROCHURE AS WELL AS THE SIDEWALKS OUTSIDE THE DOWNTOWN SMART STATION AS WELL AS THE GARAGE ON 7TH ROAD HAD A LARGE SYSTEM MAP PUT ON THE CONCRETE SO THAT CYCLISTS COULD QUICKLY SEE AND DISCOVER THEIR MEANS TO WHERE THEY WERE HEADED ON THE SERVICE. PERSONNEL HAND SUPPLIED ROUTINES TO BUSINESSES AS WELL AS DOWNTOWN SQUARE. STAFF PROCEED TO DELIVER THE TIMETABLES TO THE PLATFORM AND ALSO VISITOR CENTER.

SMART RIDERSHIP AT THE SANTA ROSA MIDTOWN STATION SO FAR GENERALLY ALIGN– WITH THE CLEVER INTEGRATION STRATEGY. RIDERSHIP ON PARK SMART BOOSTED WITH RIDERS ON DECEMBER 2017 WITH RIDERSHIP A LITTLE PULL BACK TO ABOUT 15 MOTORCYCLISTS EACH DAY. IN ORDER TO TAKE A DEEPER CHECK OUT THE RIDERSHIP, TEAM EXAMINED THE RIDERSHIP BY HR. THIS FIRST PRESENTS THAT EARLY MORNING AS WELL AS NIGHT SOLUTION IS NOT PRODUCTIVE WITH LESS THAN A MOTORCYCLIST AN HOUR AND THE 1:00 P.M. HOURS IS LOW BECAUSE OF THE FACT WITH THE SERVICES SUPPLYING An EXTREMELY SMALL COMPONENT OF THAT HOUR. THE SERVICES WAS INITIALLY CREATED AROUND SATISFYING THE NEEDS OF THE WISE COMMUTERS. BASED ON THE INFORMATION, THE TOP USAGE IN MIDTOWN SANTA ROSA TERMINAL SEEM TO BE THE MID-STAGE OF SANTA ROSA RIDERS AT THE DOWNTOWN STATION, NOT THE TRAVELER PATTERN.

THIS CONTAINER BE SEEN IN THE NOONTIME AND 3:00 P.M. PARK SMART RIDERSHIP WHERE THAT SPIKE GETS ON THOSE CHARTS. AT FIRST LOOK, IT APPEARS THAT THERE MAY BE AN CHANCE TO REORIENT THE HOURS OF TE SERVICE TO ANTICIPATE A HIGHER RIDERSHIP AT THE DOWNTOWN WISE TERMINAL. THERE IS A SPIKE IN RIDERSHIP. IT IS RATHER UNDERWHELMING AT A 2.5 BIKERS PER HR AND DRAMATICALLY BELOW OUR OWN BENCH MARKS AND ALSO OTHER COMPARABLE SERVICES. BEYER TO THE BEGINNING OF SMART TEAM COLLECTION BENCH MARKS TO ASSESS THIS SOLUTION. IN THE FIRST COLUMN FROM MARCH THROUGH JUNE 2018, THAT'' S THE PARK CLEVER DATA. YOU SEE THE AVERAGE TRAVELER TRIPS EACH MONTH AT 295, THE AVERAGE OF PASSENGER JOURNEYS PER HOUR, 1.2, THE STANDARD GUEST JOURNEYS PER DAY AND ALSO THE PRICE PER GUEST TIP AS WELL AS EXPENSE PER HR AS WELL AS THROUGHOUT THE CHART, YOU TIN SEE THE EXACT SAME FIGURES FOR PARATRANSIT, OAK MONT AND FIXED PATH AND IN 2016.

THERE ARE TWO PRIMARY BENCH MARKS RELATED TO PARK SMART. ONE PERTAINING TO LINKING SMART TO PUBLIC AUTO PARKING IN DOWNTOWN OF WHICH THE PARKING DIVISION HAS DETERMINED TWO AUTO PARKING ALLOWS THAT OIGINALLY BOUGHT FOR GRAGES ON 7TH STREET TO ACCESSIBILITY THE CLEVER SHUTTLE. BOTH OF THOSE ARE NO MORE ACTIVE. THE SECONDLY PART IS FOR THE SHUTTLE THEMSELVES ESPECIALLY FOR THE RIDERSHIP AND COST. PARK CLEVER SERVICE IS BELOW THE RIDERSHIP AND ALSO BELOW THE OAK MONT SERVICES WHICH OERATES MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY. EVEN IF WE RETURN TO THE LAST SLIDE AND ALSO YOU SEE THE SPIKES DURING THE NOON AND ALSO 3:00 P.M. HR, IT IS STILL LESS THAN THE OVERALL STANDARD RIDERSHIP OF OAK MONT WHICH IS 3.6 PER HR. THIS IS EVEN IF THE PERSONNEL REORIENT AROUND THE TOP SMART SERVICE, IT WILL REMAIN TO BE LOW AS A TRANSPORTATION ORGANIZER, IT INDICATED TO ME THAT THIS SERVICE IS UNDER PRFORMING AND THERE ARE OTHER LOWER PRICE SOLUTIONS THAT CAN SERVE THESE LIMITED RIDERS. BASED OFF THIS LEVEL INFORMATION, WE CAN SEE THAT EXTREMELY FEW ARE UTILIZING THIS SOLUTION FOR FLOW DOWN ON THIRD AND PLAZA AS WELL AS THIRD AND ALSO WILSON AND ALSO THE SQUARE ON RIDERSHIP.

ON THE SILVER LINING, IT SILVER LINING, IT SHOWS UP THAT EXISTING TRANSIT CAN OFFER THESE MOTORCYCLISTS, BIKERS UTILIZE VARIOUS OTHER METHODS TO GET BACK TO THE STATION. THE RDERSHIP SUGGEST THAT RIDERS ARE BOARDING BELOW, PARKING THEIR CARS AND ALSO RETURNING VIA PARK SMART. THE TRUTH THAT MORE PEOPLE ARE GETTING OFF THE PARK WISE AT THE TRANSIT SHOPPING CENTER MAYBE BECAUSE IT IS TE 1ST QUIT AND ALSO THEY MAYBE USED IN THE EXISTING CITY BUS SERVICE. THEY OPERATE ON THIRD ROAD WITH THE DOWNTOWN CLEVER TERMINALS. WISE CITY BUS ARE TOTALLY FREE UTILIZING THE CLIPPER CARDS. ON THE RETURN JOURNEY, IF A CYCLIST SPENDS FOR THE CITY BUS RIDE WITH THE CLIPPER CARD, THEY RECEIVE $1 CREDIT SCORE TOWARDS THEIR SMART CARD. TEAM HAVE DETERMINED SOME REASONS FOR BAD PERFORMANCE OF A WISE CAR. PARK CLEVER IS A A LITTLE REDUNDANT SOLUTION SIGNIFICANCE THAT THE PUBLIC CANISTER USE THE CITY BUS TO MAKE THE SAME TRIPS OR UTILIZE THE VEHICLE PARKING WITHIN THE SQUARE OR THE STREET GARAGE. FURTHERMORE THE PUBLIC CONTAINER UTILIZE THE EXISTING WALKWAYS AS WELL AS BICYCLE FRAMEWORK AND THE TAXIS OR UBER WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN AREA.ALL OF THESE FACTORS CONTRIBUTE TO THE LOW UTILIZATION OF THE LOW USE.

> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: WE HAVE An ACTIVITY AND A SECOND. > > I LISTENED TO FROM COUNCIL PARTICIPANT TIBBETS. > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: YOUR VOTES, PLEASE. > > COUNCILMEMBER JACK TIBBETTS: THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. > > REGARDLESS OF THE FACTORS, THIS IS A SUCCESS TALE.> > I BELIEVE FROM THE DATA SANTA ROSA ' S MIDTOWNS QUIT WAS THE THIRD MANY MADE USE OF DEPENDING ON WHEN YOU LOOKED, BUT HAD A HIGHER TOP ON THE WEEKEND BREAK AND ALSO A REDUCED TOP DURING THE WEEK DAY WHICH WOULD SUGGEST THAT IT ' S MORE PEOPLE COMING TO ENJOY MIDTOWN ON THE WEEKEND BUT NOT COMMUTERS. > > WE DID NOT DO INVESTIGATIONS WITHIN THE CITY. > > OK.

> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: THANK YOU. > > I WILL CERTAINLY RELOCATE THE COUNCIL ACCEPT THIS PRODUCT TO REINFORCE THE WEB LINK BETWEEN DOWNTOWN TERMINAL AND DOWNTOWN SANTA ROSA THROUGH JUNE 30, 2020, AND WAVE FURTHER ANALYSIS OF THE MESSAGE. > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: YOUR VOTES. > > NOT PROSECUTE. > > WE DID NOT DO INVESTIGATIONS WITHIN THE CITY.IT ' S ALWAYS BEEN CHEAP, AFFORDABLE, RATHER FOR 9 THEN and also years AND EVERYBODY THOUGHT THEY WERE SAFE, AFTER THAT ALL OF A SUDDEN, IT WASN ' T WITHOUT ANY DESCRIPTION NO LONGER AFFORDABLE.'I ' M ONE OF THE SAFE ONES BUT I ' M ENTHUSIASTIC CONCERNING THE ILITERALLY and also homeless TAKE FOOD TO HOMELESS PEOPLE ABOUT EVERY WEEK AND ALSO A FIFTY PERCENT AS WELL AS TO THEIR PETS AND ALSO CLOTHING LATELY. I ' M IMPRESSING WITH THE CONCERN THAT I ' M HEARING FROM THE CITY COUNCIL AND ALSO I ' M VERY STUNNED BY IT.KEEP IT UP.

THAT DOESN ' T INCLUDE– ALRIGHT PUBLIC AUDIO SPEAKER: I ' M GOING TO BEGIN WITH WHAT EVERYBODY RECOGNIZES, WE ARE IN A TERRIBLE HOUSING SITUATION. I ' M EXTREMELY NEGATIVE AT MA, IF– MATHEMATICS, BUT IF YOU ARE RAISING RENTAL FEE, WHY CANISTER ' T YOU DO THIS FOR FAMILIES? I HAVE HEARD THAT WE HAVE MORE HOUSING AVAILABLE, BUT AS SOON AS YOU ARE DISPLACED, YOU REQUIRED FIRST AS WELL AS LAST MONTH ' S RENTAL FEES AND MANY PEOPLE DON ' T HAVE THAT MNEY TO PUT OUT SO THEY ARE SOFA SURFING OR LIVING WITH VARIOUS OTHER HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS.'I ' M ONE OF THE RISK-FREE ONES BUT I ' M ENTHUSIASTIC REGARDING THE HOMELESS AND ILITERALLY TAKE FOOD TO HOMELESS PEOPLE ABOUT EVERY WEEK AND ALSO A FIFTY PERCENT AS WELL AS TO THEIR DOGS AND ALSO APPAREL RECENTLY. I ' M EXCITING WITH THE CONCERN THAT I ' M HEARING FROM THE CITY COUNCIL AND ALSO I ' M REALLY SURPRISED BY IT.KEEP IT UP.I RECOGNIZE WE DEMAND TO TAKE A LOOK AT OHER LONG-TERM HOUSE SOLUTIONS. OTHERS REQUIRED TO CONSIDER ALONG THOSE LINES BUT IN THE SHORT-TERM, WE ARE STILL IN AN EMERGENCY AND WE NEED TO RESTORE THIS REGULATION. >>> > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: THANKS. DAISY FOLLOWED– >> > > HI. DAISY, SONOMA REGION CONSERVATION ACTION.

I GREW UP HERE AND ALSO CRAZY TO MOVE BACK AFTER THE FIRES AND ALSO IT'' S TAKEN ME MONTHS TO MOVE. I HAVE RELOCATED FROM SAN FRANCISCO AS WELL AS PAYING THE RENTAL FEE NEAR OF WHAT I WAS PAYING IN SFWRANS– SAN FRANCISCO WHICH IS CRAZY. I'HAVE WORKERS AS WELL AS I ' M STRUGGLING TO MAINTAIN THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE HAVING PROBLEM SEARCHING FOR HOUSING AND ALSO THIS PREVAILS WHEN I LISTEN TO FROM COMPANIES TALKING WITH YOUR PERSONNEL WITH EVERY ONE OF THE COMPANIES IN THE AREA, THEY CONTAINER'' T PAY THEIR WORKER ENOUGH TO LIVE HERE. SIMILAR TO THE FIRES, MANY INDIVIDUAL HAVE LEFT. LOTS PEOPLE HAVE LEFT WHO WOULD HAVE SPOKEN AOUT THE CONCERNS AS WELL.WE WILL PROCEED TO COME TO BE A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT IS LARGELY FULL OF GETAWAY HOMES AND A PLAYGROUND FOR THE WEALTHY IF WE DON'' T PRODUCE HOUSING FOR THE EMPLOYEES, FOR THE ELDERLY AS WELL AS FOR THE YOUNG INDIVIDUALS WHO INTENDED TO RAISE FAMILIES HERE. THIS ISN'' T NEARLY RENT CONTROL BUT WE REQUIREMENT TO PRODUCE MORE OPTIONS. THIS IS REAL ESTATE SUPPLY AND ALSO DEVELOP MULTIFAMILY HOUSING, SMALLER UNITS AS WELL AS HOUSES THAT ARE NATURALLY AFFORDABLE. WE ARE IN A SITUATION. THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST INDIVIDUALS THAT HAVE BEEN IN YOUR CHAMBERS IN A LONG TIME AND I HOPE THAT IS RESONATING WITH EACH OF YOU. IF THEY KNEW ABOUT THIS, I RECOGNIZE EACH OF YOU HAVE SEVERAL CONSTITUENTS IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. MR. OLIVARES, OBVIOUSLY YOUR AREA IS RIGHT HERE. MR. SAWYER, I PUT ON'' T KNOW WHAT OCCURRED WITH LOTS OF OF YOUR CITIZENS, BUT I WISH YOU WOULD BE SUPPORTING THIS. SPEAKER: GOOD AFTERNOON. I WOULD LIKE FOR YOU TO THINK ABOUT THE DECISION FOR THOSE TAT ARE INCREASING THE RENT THERE ARE THOSE FUNCTIONING 3-4 JOBS AND STILL CONTAINER NOT AFFORD TO PAY THE RENTAL FEE. MAYBE A FEW OF YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY OF OWNING YOUR OWN RESIDENCE, BUT SOME OF US HAVE TO RENT IT TO LIVE.

IN YOUR DECISION, HOPEFULLY YOU CAN THINK OF THE INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE NOT ABLE TO PAY RENTAL FEE. THANK YOU. PUBLIC AUDIO SPEAKER: HI, MY NAME IS BONNIE PETTY. A NEIGHBOR OF MAYOR COURSEY. I'' M BELOW WITH THE JOBS OF JUSTICE, A NEIGHBORHOOD LABOR UNION OF NEIGHBORHOOD BASED COMPANIES WHICH STRONGLY SUPPORTS THE EXPANSION OF THE 10% RENTAL FEE CAP FOR THE RENTAL PROPERTIES AS WELL AS FOR FOOD AND MEDICINE AND ALSO OTHER NECESSARY PRODUCTS. IT'' S OBVIOUS THAT WE ARE STILL IN DILEMMA HERE, AS WELL AS I BELIEVE THAT WHAT WE ARE SEEING IS THAT WE ARE NOW IN THE VERGE OF SEEING A SUBSTANTIAL VARIATION OF CITIZEN RENTERS.MY FAMILY MEMBERS HAS GIVEN UP AND ALSO RELOCATED TO RENO NEVADA AS WELL AS NOT UPCOMING BACK AND THEY HAVE BEEN RIGHT HERE FOR 50 YEARS. IT ' S JUST A TRAGEDY. LATELY, A JOB RECORD RELEASED A RECORD THAT GIVES SIGNIFICANT DATA SOME OF WHICH HAS BEEN EXPRESSED RIGHT HERE THIS EVENING. THIS REPORT CAN BE FOUND ON THE WEBSITE AT NORTH BAY JOBS WITH JUSTICE.ORG/ RECORDS. I HOPE YOU WILL CONSIDER IT AND MOVE FORWARD AND ALSO CHOOSE ON A MONTHLY BASIS NEEDS TO YOU CHOOSE TO ACCOMPLISH THIS. AS YOU DECIDE ON A MONTHLY

BASIS AS AN SERIOUSNESS TO THIS SCENARIO. MY FAMILY IS ONE OF THOSE AS THOSE HAVE STATED THAT IN SPITE OF 2 RATHER OKAY EARNINGS, WE PAY OUT OVER 40% OF OUR INCOME TO PAY RENTAL FEE. I ' M FORTUNATE SINCE I'HAVE A FANTASTIC LANDLORD AND SO MUCH WE CAN STILL SOMEHOW HANDLE TO PAY OUR LEASE, BUT THAT CONTAINER CHANGE LITERALLY IN A HEARTBEAT. ALL I HAVE TO DO IS HAVE MY PROPERTY MANAGER MARKET AND IT'' S THROUGHOUT.

I'' M FORTUNATE, BUT LUCK IS NOT A BUDGETING TOOL FOR OCCUPANTS. IT IS NOT TE METHOD TO LIVE AND HOW YOU SURVIVE LIFE. IN REALITY, KISMET HAS FOR THE A LOT OF PART TRANSFORMED HER BACK ON SONOMA RENTERS. PLEASE ACTORS THIS EXTENSION. THANK YOU. SPEAKER: EXCELLENT NIGHT, MY NAME IS LINDA EVANS. A MEMBER OF THE JOB COMPEL AS WELL AS ORGANIZING JOB. I WANT TO THANK MAYOR COURSEY FOR CANGING THE ORDER DUE TO THE FACT THAT I RECOGNIZE SOME INDIVIDUALS HAVE HAD TO LEAVE ALREADY. I FUNCTION WITH UNDOCU FUNDS AND ALSO ALONG WITH IMMIGRANTS FROM THE JOB WE and also compel HAVE CONDUCTED INTERVIEWS FROM INDIVIDUALS WITH THE FIRES RELATING TO THEIR SITUATION. IT'' S CLEAR THAT THE EMERGENCY SITUATION CONTINUES. I APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT THE COUNCIL APPEARS TO RECOGNIZE THAT.HOWEVER, OUR AREA HAS BEEN AFFECTED UNEQUALLY BY THE FIRES, IMMIGRANT INDIVIDUALS AND UNDOCUMENTED PEOPLE ARE ENDURING STILL. THEY ARE UNABLE TO OBTAIN REAL ESTATE AND LIVING 2-3 FAMILIES TOGETHER IN A ONE BED ROOM HOME BECAUSE THEY CONTAINER NOT FIND AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE. IT ' S IMMEDIATE. I CHOSE MY COMMON COUNCIL TO REPRESENT OUR ENTIRE AREA. ALL OF THE RESIDENTS OF SANTA ROSA AS WELL AS PEOPLE IN OUR REGION. I FEEL THAT YOU MUST HAVE THE MOST EFFECTIVE INTEREST OF OUR ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD AT HEART ALTHOUGH YOU MAY NOT SPECIFICALLY REPRESENT PEOPLE WHO CAN ' T BALLOT. IT IS IN EVERY ONE OF OUR RATE OF INTEREST FOR'THERE TO

BE EQUAL RIGHTS AS WELL AS REAL ESTATE. I THINK IT ' S CRITICAL THAT YOU LIKEWISE CONSIDER THE BIGGER PICTURE AND ALSO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT IN ORDER FOR PEOPLE T LIVE RIGHT HERE, THEY NEED TO HAVE HIGHER INCOMES. WE NEED TO HAVE A LIVING WAGE IN SONOMA COUNTY SO INDIVIDUALS CONTAINER AFFORD TO LIVE BELOW. IN THE DESCRIPTION, SOMETHING TOOK PLACE TO ME, PERHAPS THERE IS A METHOD TO DISCOVER SOME RENT STABLIZING. PERHAPS A METHOD TO TIE THE RENT INCREASES TO THE ACTUAL COST-OF-LIVING IS FOR THE COMMON COUNCIL TO IMPLEMENT TO PASS AS WELL AS APPLY A RATE GOUGING REGULATION THAT IS SPECIFIC TO THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA THAT WILL ACTUALLY CONNECT RENT RISES TO COST-OF-LIVING INCREASES AS WAS PROPOSED IN THE RENT STABILIZATION BALLOT ACTION. PUBLIC AUDIO SPEAKER: GOOD NIGHT, MAYOR, GOOD EVENING CITY COUNCIL. I REPRESENT CITIZENS AS WELL AS REAL ESTATE CARRIERS. WHATEVER YOU MAKE A DECISION TO ACCOMPLISH TONIGHT REPRESENTING THOSE PEOPLE THAT I ENGAGE WITH REGULARLY, WHATEVER YOU CHOOSE TO DO, THEY ARE GOING TO HONOR. I GET PHONE CALLS AND INQUIRIES FROM DOZENS OF INDIVIDUALS AT ANY GIVEN TIME WANTING TO KNOW WHAT THE ITENTION IS OF THE AREA OF THE CITY OF THE STATE. WHAT ARE THEY ALLOWED TO PERFORM, WHAT ARE THEY NOT ALLOWED TO DO AS WELL AS HOW DO THEY STAY IN CONFORMITY WITH TE LAW. A PERSON EARLIER WAS SAYING THANK BENEFITS IT ' S ONLY 10% BECAUSE GIVEN THE POSSIBILITY, LANDLORDS WOULD FEE EVEN MORE. I WOULD BEG TO DIFFER AS WELL AS SINCE THE FIRE AND SOMEBODY WAS AKING TO LEARN MORE, OUR LAST YEAR RISE WAS 5%. IT COULD BE 10 %, WE DIDN ' T. USUALLY IT WAS 5. AND ALSO EVERY PROPERTY OWNER WHO STATED I CAN DO 10 %, WE HAD THOSE THAT DID NOTHING. A LOT OF OUR CHARACTERISTICS ARE STILL WHAT THEY WERE PRIOR TO THE FIRE.OUR STANDARD OCCUPANCY IS EVEN MORE TAN FOUR YEARS AND WE ARE COGNIZANT OF THE REALITY THAT IT IS DIFFICULT TO LIVE AS MUCH AS COST. I WLL MENTION THAT THIS IS NOT AN ACTUAL

10% CAP DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE LONGER IT EXTENDS, THE LESS OF A PERCENT IT IS BECAUSE IF YOU DO IT OVER 2 YEARS IT ' S 5%. IF YOU DO IT EVEN MORE THAN THAT, IT ' S LESS. WHAT I WOULD SAY IS I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT WE REMAIN IN THE disaster and also a catastrophe WILL CERTAINLY TAKE PLACE FOR A VERY LONG TIME. I WOULD DEMAND THAT THE COUNCIL PLEASE CONSIDER REVISITING THIS AS A SPECIFIC TIME IN THE FUTURE RATHER THAN LINKING IT TO THE TRUTH THAT THE CITY IS IN A CONTINUOUS STATE OF CATASTROPHE AND ALSO WLL BE FOR A WHILE. THANKS. SPEAKER: GOOD NIGHT, COUNCIL MEMBERS, MY NAME IS MARTY BENNETT WITH SOCIAL FOR JUSTICE. OUR ORGANIZATION IS STRUGGLING TO ASSISTANCE THE EXTENSION OF THE 10% CAP. WE CANISTER ' T EM EMPHASIZE SUFFICIENT THAT THE RENTAL PROP HAS PUT United States IN A TIGHT SPOT. OUR NEW RECORD, THE STATE OF WORKING SONOMA REGION 2018 GIVES THE ADHERING TO DATA: IN BETWEEN 2000-2016 MEAN RENTS BOOSTED BY 2,000 IN THE AREA WHILE MEDIAN EARNINGS RENTERS INCREASED BY 9% AND THE GAP HAS ACTUALLY DEFINITELY EXPANDED ALSO MORE BY 6% IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE TUBBS FIRE. NEARLY ONE IN 2 RENTAL HOUSEHOLDS CAN PAY VERY LITTLE FOR LEASE. 70% OF THESE LOW INCOME FAMILIES PAY MORE THAN 30 %OF THEIR GROSS MONTHLY INCOME FOR LEASE. OUR NEAR CATASTROPHIC HOUSING CRISIS MINIMALLY REQUIRES THE 6% LEASING CAPS, IN LOS ANGELES REGION, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SIMPLY MANDATED A 3 %RENT CAP ON ALL RENTAL QUALITIES FOR 6 MONTHS. GOING FORWARD TO STOP MASS VARIATION, SANTA ROSA OUGHT TO CONSIDER A LOWER RENTAL FEE CAP

COMPARABLE TO LOS ANGELES. THANKS QUITE. SPEAKER: GOOD AFTERNOON, MY NAME IS MARRY– I ' M THE VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE CBI GROUP. WE ARE STRESSED REGARDING THE 10 %CAP. THERE IS INDIVIDUALS THAT THEIR RENTAL FEE HAS ACTUALLY RAISED GREATER THAN WHAT THEY ACTUALLY EARN. THERE ARE STILL INDIVIDUALS THAT HAVEN ' T RECOVERED FROM THE FIRES. THERE IS PEOPLE THAT SHED RESIDENCES AND ALSO THEY ARE NOT WELL PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY. LET'' S NOT ADD ANOTHER TENSION TO THEM AND CONTINUE INCREASING THE 10% CAP. THANK YOU. > > MANY THANKS, MAYOR AND ALSO MEMBERS. AS I ' M LISTENING TO PEOPLE TRYING TO DESCRIBE THEIR SCENARIOS, I HAVE PUT MYSELF IN THEIR SHOES AND CONSIDER A PERSON WHO DOESN ' T HAVE A DEALT WITH MORTGAGE. FOR YEARS, I RECOGNIZED FOR THE NEXT AS LONG AS I'WANTED TO RESIDE IN MY HOME, I WOULD BE PAYING A FIXED PRICE. BEING AT THE GRACE OF A MARKET IS >> ONE THAT IS DISTURBED AS WELL AS IS A MAJOR NEGATIVE ASPECT. NOT JUST TO INDIVIDUALS THAT LEASE. IT ' S A DOWNSIDE BECAUSE An AREA ONLY ENDURES IF IT HAS'A RANGE OF POINTS. I AGREE WE SHOULDN ' T REMAIN IN THIS CRISIS FOREVER BUT WE ARE NOT FROM IT TODAY. EXTENDING THIS 10% CAP FOR AT LEAST THE NEXT SIX MONTHS IS A GREAT CONCEPT. THANK YOU. > > I WANT TO READ TO YOU THE THE GOLDEN STATE CODE OF LEGISLATION. OF CRIMES AGAINST THE PUBLIC WELLNESS AND ALSO SECURITY. DURING A STATE OF EMERGENCY SITUATION, A NEIGHBORHOOD EMERGENCY SITUATION'INCLUDING BUT NOT– IT GOES ON AND ON. THE POINT IS ENACTING IN 1972. IT ' S NECESSARY NOW. IT ' S NECESSARY IN THE FUTURE WE HAVEN ' T HAD REAL ESTATE CRISIS LIKE THIS. I TOLD YOU IN BUTTE AREA, THEY ARE SHIPPING INDIVIDUALS OUT OF THE COUNTY. WE HAD BEFORE THE FIRES 80% OF INDIVIDUALS PAYING GREATER THAN 50% OF THEIR EARNINGS FOR RENT AS WELL AS TRANSPORTATION. THAT ' S THE GREATEST IN THE WHOLE NATION. IT'WAS SOMETHING LIKE 75 %OR SOMETHING IN NEW YORK CITY CITY AND ALSO APPROXIMATELY SIMILAR IN

SAN FRANCISCO. WE ARE WAY HIGHER. AS WELL AS A LOT OF IT IS A CONSIDERABLE PART IS TRANSPORTATION; KEEPING THAT CLAIMED, THAT MEANS ONLY 20 %IS PAYING LESS. ROUGHLY LIKE 25% ARE BETWEEN A TOTAL OF 25 SPECIFICALLY IN BETWEEN 20 AND ALSO 55 AND ALSO( 2 )055-6015 BETWEEN 60 AND ALSO 65. 10 PERCENT AND ALSO EVERYBODY NEAR TO 75%. REGULAR RENTALS ARE BASED ON THE CONTRAST OF THE MARKET. INDIVIDUALS PUT AN EXPECTATION OF LEASE, A VERY HIGH RENT. THANKS. PUBLIC AUDIO SPEAKER: ONE IS THAT THE COST CAP AND THE RENTAL FEE IS INJURING United States. IF YOUR RENT WAS $1,000 OCTOBER 9, 2017, LANDLORDS CONTAINER NOT ELEVATE IT ABOVE$ 1100. THE ONLY FACTOR THEY WOULD HOLD OUT ON A BUILDING IS IF THEY IDEA THEY CONTAINER COST $1500 THE DAY THE LEASE CAP VANISHES. THAT MIGHT NOT BE COST GOUGING LEGITIMATELY WHEN IT TAKES PLACE, BUT IT ' S NOT A FACTOR TO NOT EXTEND THE RENT CAP. 2, ENFORCEMENT, YOU ARE SUGGESTING THAT IF YOU TIN ' T FIND SOMEONE TO ENFORCE THIS, YOU SHOULDN ' T DO THIS. YOU STRONGLY IMPLIED THAT, A NUMBER OF YOU. BUT IF THEY WON ' T IMPLEMENT IT, THAT ' S ON THEM. IF YOU DON ' T ALSO PROVIDE THEM SOMETHING TO ENFORCE, THAT ' S ON YOU. AD THIRD, I RECOGNIZE IN AN EARLIER ITEM THIS SURFACED'AS WELL AS IT ' S BEEN TALKED CONCERNING A LITTLE LITTLE BIT. DOES THIS PUT ON HOMELESS PEOPLE GENERALLY'OR TO PEOPLE DISPLACED BY THE FIRES? WELL, IT IS NOT

RECOGNIZED BY THE HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS THAT WERE DISPLACED BY THE FIRES'. THERE WERE LOTS OF THAT HAD A STABLE LNGSTANDING AREAS AND THE FIRES DID YOUR TASK FOR YOU, THE'WORK THAT YOU HAVE CHOSEN TO DO AND SCATTERING THEM TO THE WIND EQUALLY AS HEARTLESSLY'. THANK YOU. > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: DAVE HARTMAN? > > PUBLIC AUDIO SPEAKER: OK, TALKING OF BEING WORN OUT as well as old, A GREAT DEAL OF United States ARE. AS WELL AS MY NAME IS ALTHEA HARTMAN. THANK YOU, MAYOR COURSEY AND OTHER FRIENDS AS WELL AS SOON TO B FRIENDS. I INTEND TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF INCREASING THE 10% CAP. I ' M A RETIRED PROFESSIONAL.I LIVE AT VANTAGE PARK APARTMENTS WHICH ARE SENIOR APARTMENTS. JUSTINE HAD EVERYONE RAISE THEIR HANDS. THESE INDIVIDUALS HAVE COME, WE ARE AL OLD AND ALSO WE >>ALL STAYED UP LATE. I NEEDED TO GO TO THE BATHROOM>. I HAVE A WALKER AND ALSO THE WASHROOM WAS SECURED. I WISH TO ALLOW YOU UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE RIGHT HERE AGAINST HARDSHIP TO TELL YOU THIS IS A MINOR CHALLENGES AS WELL AS WHAT WE ARE CONFRONTING WITH LEASE IS A SIGNIFICANT DIFFICULTY. WE RESIDE IN An AREA THAT I NOT HUD AND YOU PROBABLY

HEARD THEM DISCUSS THEM.TEY ARE EXPECTED TO BE AFFORDABLE AND ALSO THEY ARE NOT. A COUPLE YEARS BACK THEY BEGAN ELEVATING THE RENTAL FEE A WHOLE LOT. WITH TE FIRE, THEY WANTED TO ELEVATE I MORE, BUT THEY COULDN ' T SINCE OF THE 10%, BUT THEY HAD BEEN GIVEN AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE IT EVEN MORE. MANY OF U PAY EVEN MORE THAN 50 %OF OUR EARNINGS AS WELL AS RENT. WHEN YOUR INCOME IS ONLY $1,000 A MONTH, and. THAT LEAVES YOU WITH EXTREMELY LITTLE TO INVEST. PEOPLE ARE NOW WHERE I LIVE ARE NW GOING WITHOUT REQUIREMENTS LIKE HOME HEATING AND ALSO MEDICINE. WE GAVE UP OUR LITTLE SALL LUXURIES LONG AGO. WE WERE ALL MIDDLE-CLASS ONCE. ALL OF US CAME HERE. A LOT OF United States CAME FROM NICE HOUSES AND WE HAD CARS AND WE HAD FAMILY MEMBERS. > > > > MAYOR CHRIS COURSEY: THANK YOU, MS. HARTMAN. > > THANK YOU. IF YOU WANT TEM, as well as I HAVE STANDING. > > > > > > > >.

AS I ' M LISTENING TO INDIVIDUALS TRYING TO DESCRIBE THEIR SITUATIONS, I HAVE PUT MYSELF IN THEIR SHOES AND ALSO THINK OF A PERSON THAT DOESN ' T HAVE A FIXED HOME MORTGAGE. IT ' S NECESSARY IN THE FUTURE WE HAVEN ' T HAD HOUSING SITUATION LIKE THIS. 2, ENFORCEMENT, YOU ARE IMPLYING THAT IF YOU CAN ' T FIND SOMEBODY TO ENFORCE THIS, YOU SHOULDN ' T DO IT. IF THEY WON ' T ENFORCE IT, THAT ' S ON THEM. IF YOU PUT ON ' T ALSO PROVIDE THEM SOMETHING TO IMPLEMENT, THAT ' S ON YOU.

As found on YouTube

PEOPLE – SERVICES – IMPACT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © The Vega Family Foundation. All rights reserved.