The following > > I ' m Smart ' s Genuine Residential or commercial property permit contract suggest clever personnel believes that they can figure out the security of the Jennings crossing and whether the city built or My study indicates that it can ' t do Short article 12 Section 8 of the California Constitution mentions that a public body like wise may not manage matters over which legislature gives governing power to the Public Utilities Commission.Public Utilities, code areas, 1, 2, 0, 1, 1, 2, 0, 2, and 9, 9, 1, 5, to provide peuc exclusive authority to approve a place. Just that ' s the restriction under the fee These are specific framework or facility kinds and the vital pieces that go to update or growth just because they ' re focusing on growth.It ' s commonly not upkeep of existing facilities as we can see from the table to the There ' s a details percent malfunction for the allocation. We ' ve noted a few out right here as examples of the projects that we ' ve done and what the amount of cff that ' s been gathered that goes into that.So, for instance, the bike and Overcrossing.
The next > > I ' m Smart ' s Genuine Residential or commercial property license agreement suggest wise team thinks that they can establish the safety and security of the Jennings going across and whether the city constructed or My study shows that it can ' t do Short article 12 Area 8 of the California Constitution states that a public body like clever might not regulate matters over which legislature gives governing power to the Public Utilities Commission.Public Utilities, code areas, 1, 2, 0, 1, 1, 2, 0, 2, and 9, 9, 1, 5, to give peuc unique authority to accept a place. And the developments clearly play right into that because that ' s the population that ' s increasing with those costs. Only that ' s the constraint under the fee These are particular facilities or center types and the important pieces that go to update or development just due to the fact that they ' re concentrating on growth.It ' s usually not maintenance of existing centers as we can see from the table to the There ' s a particular percent breakdown for the allocation. It ' s not a job that ' s market price. We ' ve listed a couple of out here as instances of the jobs that we ' ve done and what the quantity of cff that ' s been collected that goes into that.So, for instance, the bike and Overcrossing.Our referral would certainly be that if we ' re not backfilling or there isn ' t a clear backfilling to at the very least evaluate what that effect would certainly be throughout the web link to that waiver process.The 4th which I assume this is a piece where we currently have some points relocating in that instructions. If you ' re looking to examine the monetary impacts of minimizing particular costs and not increasing, then there ' s other versions to do that.We ' re utilizing the charge research study as a base. Actually, that ' s that ' s commonly a type of when prioritize to that.
As we went via our personnel analysis on you understand, we that I guess there ' s one major takeaway is that when you ' re looking a revenue comes in and one-time revenues at that. Thank you, Madam > > so if we ' re to think about the 62 next, a and I know you sanctuary ' t had time to investigate some of the proposals of come in some kind of asking you to assume in the abstract ABC 602, Texas study or policy. If you look at a decrease of the cost, you ' re not truly changing the methodology.What you ' re looking at is exactly how can the city deliver the jobs that are embedded in the checklist and what type of various other funding sources are offered for that. If you ' re looking to analyze the economic influences of reducing specific costs and not boosting, then there ' s other models to do that.We ' re utilizing the cost study as a base. Really, that ' s that ' s commonly a type of when focus on to that.And that ' s why I ' m concerned concerning the long-term impact, however, is we I feel like we put on ' t have enough details to do that. It ' s I ' m possibly not the finest on the the flight type of that ' s. Since it appears great and it continues to inform individuals that center open to housing and there ' s some quality to that or are we additionally chatting about making up for an economic climate where at the very least making it less complicated in an economic environment so that we obtain something when we or else could not get anything.I believe that ' s what I ' d be fascinated in hearing from individuals.
And that ' s why I ' m worried about the lasting influence, however, is we I feel like we don ' t have adequate details to do that. >'> And the presumption is, and it ' s it ' s simply exactly how design works with monitoring of infrastructure based on the number of rooms, there ' s an expected occupancy load in the buildings. That is And simply for the record, I want to make sure that we are presently in conformity >> with it ' s simply when we go via that research study again, that ' s really what it ' s looking at. Yeah, I believe what we ' ve seen there ' s there ' s been a couple of factors and actually some of this started in reaction to the Tubbs fire. Due to the fact that it appears excellent and it proceeds to tell people that focus open to housing and there ' s some quality to that or are we likewise talking about making up for a financial climate where at least making it much easier in a financial climate so that we obtain something when we otherwise might not get anything.I think that ' s what I ' d be intrigued in hearing from people.> > So I ' m I ' m just going throw couple of points out for me. I ' ve been hearing a whole lot regarding the lasting economic happens when we housing in building and I ' m not certain I ' m not a financial expert. I'assume that ' s part of the objective of however we can come back with with a solution especially there > > allow me I have the reserve numbers for you, however I think let me just due to the fact that we ' re sending a great deal of stuff to you in creating.
And I ' m wondering what what ' s in the pipeline? > > So I ' m I ' m just going throw few things out for me. > > There ' s there ' s 2 methods of looking at it either. I ' ve been hearing a great deal concerning the long-lasting financial occurs when we real estate in building and I ' m not certain I ' m not an economic expert. I'assume that ' s component of the objective of but we can come back with with a solution particularly there > > let me I have the reserve numbers for you, but I think allow me simply because we ' re sending out a whole lot of things to you in creating.You ' re either going to pay for the housing or you ' re going to pay to not have the real estate. I ' m I ' m right here today to sustain the proposal to right-sizing effect charge. I ' m below to voice support for economical housing and highlight the urgency of the housing dilemma in the with our area partnership with generation real estate, we ' ve been examining the housing environment and the city and region and discovering how youngsters and households can be uplifted via the cost effective real estate plans, specifically our family ' s most influenced by systemic and structural racism.As many of us know, availability to budget-friendly and secure housing is a huge precursor to positive health and development for family members with young kids.
You ' re either going to pay for the real estate or you ' re going to pay to not have the real estate. Every solitary dollar counts, influence fees or something that developers are borrowing either using the construction lending or the permanent'funding to pay back and those effect charges can be between 300,000 and a million dollars on something like a 40 million Buck project.So I really I ' m encouraged the council to act, keep asking those inquiries once again, to desires, comments to believe about the prices that are much more challenging to evaluate, then these impact costs that our area pays when we wear ' t have budget friendly Thank you. If you go to any dining establishment, Sonoma Region and appears working there is mostly Latino is if you go to the lodging facilities and see that ' s transforming down the beds in clean areas, mostly Latino is if you go to the vineyards in Sonoma Region, assumption who ' s functioning there? I ' m I ' m below today to support the proposition to right-sizing impact charge. I ' m here to voice support for economical real estate and emphasize the necessity of the housing dilemma in the through our neighborhood collaboration with generation real estate, we ' ve been analyzing the real estate environment and the city and county and learning how households and children can be uplifted via the economical real estate policies, particularly our family ' s most influenced by architectural and systemic racism.As most of us recognize, accessibility to cost effective and stable real estate is a substantial precursor to positive health and advancement for families with young kids.Don ' t know if that ' s going to take place. I ' m the brand-new outreach supporter generation housing.And right here ' s chat to you around right currently is the time for Affordable Home scene. When the cost of something doesn ' t come up.For instance, that house that was under$200,000, it ' s now$800,000.
Allred claims program completes much, a lot of what Sacramento is already doing and it'' s setting you back much less and will apply to even more than simply a deed limited cost effective units yet likewise deed limited moderate.A considerable portion of the present surplus of these has actually been collected off of this factor burst of new real estate that you ' ve heard all about developed during a time of one time restore funds. Don ' t know if that ' s going to happen. Unpredictable housing, enhances a youngster ' s a rating impacting the neither the moment end results that ' s instability. My name is Max and claiming I ' m I ' m the research supervisor at Generation real estate over the past, feels like 2 hours or so. I ' m the brand-new outreach supporter generation housing.And below ' s talk to you about right currently is the time for Affordable House scene.I do believe that it ' s everything I think its redevelopment going away and that ' s attempting to figure out exactly how to deal with that.I do assume that it ' s purpose in our city land and maintaining that UFOs of. >'> and just actually swiftly, the impressive inquiries that I didn ' t response the 2 council just to make certain we ' re conscious in the public has a response to that.The number of economical units that are actually pending, all set to relocate to building and construction is 301. It ' s not simply the council on the staff.It ' s it ' s likewise the members right here in the audience that have played a substantial duty in that.
> > If you ' re speaking regarding the gets for like the parks, I think one of the public commenters did say from their calculations it was 25 15, but that has not been vetted my understanding was it was 25 million that ' s been designated. Or else you ' re not going to obtain on the real estate and to the factor that we chatted around, we ' re not losing any type of money by reducing costs if nothing obtains built. I do think that it ' s every little thing I believe its redevelopment going away and that ' s attempting to figure out exactly how to fix that.I do assume that it ' s function in our city land and keeping that UFOs of. >'> and simply truly swiftly, the impressive questions that I didn ' t answer the 2 council just to make certain we ' re conscious in the public has a response to that.The number of budget friendly units that are really pending, ready to move to building and construction is 301. It ' s not just the council on the staff.It ' s it ' s also the members here in the target market that have actually played a considerable role in that.I put on ' t believe that it ' s exclusively a global concern. If you ' re amphitheater, we ' re not going to charge you separately for the stage. As much as Talk a little bit about the initial bullet factor there, just due to the fact that it ' s it ' s essential to what can be understood as a cost rise.
I put on ' t assume that it ' s only an international issue. That will certainly better direct us as a division in the future to look at these kinds of charges and give you people extra propositions that are based off of an ideology that we all concurred on and a company strategy so at this time it was truly just recognizing a few locations where we are conscious that having not enhanced costs because at least 2017, in some areas also longer, it ' s not every charge got changed in 2017, there ' s just a few locations for financial shots ability with our general fund properties to make sure that we resolve those areas. If you ' re auditorium, we ' re not going to bill you separately for the phase. Once more, these points that can be taken as a little petty concealed fees and that kind of things of right here right into the space and you obtain there and you truly desire a platform and we had simply a paper says it ' s OK, we ' re going to bill you an additional $15 for usage the podium. If we have offered for you, we ' re going give and we put on ' t need to have those added an added tack on costs.That is put on ' t don ' t be We will certainly still have the Ridgeway water side. I don ' t recognize why we had 2 of them, yet we put on ' t need them. Is that something that you would certainly desire us to explore'really look in the with the things is to state,'hey, allow ' s let ' s look at broadening that and placing a bigger discount on on resident costs than what we currently do.I ' m also looking at those points like the nonprofit or the league from just typical private rentals.
That is put on ' t put on ' t be We will certainly still have the Ridgeway water side. And so what we ' ve had in the past as we ' ve had an agreement come to you and get accepted. Is that something that you would certainly desire us to explore'really look in the with the things is to say,'hey, allow ' s let ' s look at expanding that and putting a bigger discount rate on on resident costs than what we currently do.I ' m likewise looking at those things like the not-for-profit or the league from just normal personal services. Simply if I ' m proposing, hi there, we ' ve obtained to elevate charges. And after that there are leads kids that don ' t have $500 to sign up for a leak took part and it makes it even harder the coaches have actually to either come out of their pocket to and they ' re already getting them cleats in spheres and all this various other stuff.When it comes to never ever Park parks where we do have the issue where we have leaders with that claimed tight-knit community or looking assistance kids from that limited weaved community.And there '
s a means to supply them rewards, whether it'' s weaver costs, whether it'' s it ' s preference on just how to provide them the park where they live. And I put on'' t know'possibly'we ' re we ' re we ' re three-quarters of the bulk of kids. That'' s the subscription fee that ' s currently there.When you pay subscription, you get the buck discount.
The version of moving like this one is to currently a component of our water facility where we'' ve already made all those lodgings at the Finley Aquatic Facility, I assume makes a lot more feeling now it'' s much less desirable due to the fact that it'' s not offered to the public all the and they have to pay and go admission to the family members community center.But for example, when the Residence parties to the White House park when that when need be restored was around the exact same time that those regulations, a weapon in place of the price tag, as well, certainly for for saving water, not having the biggest go down the drainpipe. When it comes to never Park parks where we do have the issue where we have leaders with that stated tight-knit area or looking aid children from that limited knit community.And there '
s a method to supply them motivations, whether it'' s weaver costs, whether it'' s it ' s choice on just how to use them the park where they live. And I put on'' t recognize'possibly'we ' re we ' re we ' re three-quarters of the bulk of youngsters. That'' s the subscription cost that ' s now there.When you pay membership, you obtain the dollar price cut. > > Alright, doesn'' t look like they ' re anywhere remarks.We ' re going to highlight some of the areas that our city lawyer ' s workplace supplied that. > > So I ' m I ' m really going to be discussing Smart ' s January 26th agreement. > > That wasn ' t a And the negotiations that we had with wise did start making use of some of the language that ' s recommended in this modified.
And that ' s where we ' re going to be beginning the conversation tonight. We ' re going to highlight some of the areas that our city attorney ' s office gave that. > > So I ' m I ' m truly going to be going over Smart ' s January 26th arrangement. We acknowledge that we weren ' t looking for a well balanced and reasonable alternative, but certainly a balanced choice so that the city ' s direct exposure is limited. That ' s not exactly what ' s on the table from wise.And the third thing below is even more of even more of a setting of where where at hop for And I know that it'' s undesirable. But the bottom line is if we'' re unable to achieve a an equally concurred upon permit between clever and the city, the court will certainly pull back. The crossing application and we will be back at him square one where we were in 2015 and I put on'' t really feel that if we can ' t come to an arrangement, I wear ' t seem like we await that. We need to wait for the judge to take that action. And so I'' ve incorporated that below for your consideration.Not due to the fact that staff has established it ' s the most effective strategy,'however it is a reasonable strategy provided where we ' re at in this program. And so that'' s why that has been included. Several of the parting items I simply desire to throw away there prior to I let you all dispute and ask One is there will come with this a construction contract that we have yet to go over with wise that construction arrangements mosting likely to be likely comparable to the one we checked in 2017 that went unsigned carried out by wise. It will establish the terms whereby the city pays for the building of the center. Smart will eventually and managing the contractor that would do that.We prepare for that that ' s concerning a 4 and a half million bucks. Overall building job and we have roughly about 1.1 million dollars offered in the account remaining from our earlier variation of trying to get in the ground. Once created this certificate contract. Establishes that they'' ll be a continuous upkeep, an element of our relationship. With the cities contract of either of these 2 a permit propositions we would take on 100% of the procedure and maintenance now smarts not mosting likely to have us employ service providers. They'' re mosting likely to work with the specialists and we ' re mosting likely to pay them for the services that they ' re service providers are offering at this particular place. It implies if something breaks will be paying the expense for whatever breaks and from a point of view, that'' s that ' s just fair. It ' s it ' s our going across. We asked for it. We intend to see that happen. And therefore, that ' s developed right into this as well as that the city will certainly handle that degree of responsibility.Exhibit B, which is not in right here today, however Exhibit B will certainly describe with detail the love of the areas that the city is liable for and the areas that the at that smart will be responsible for. I ' ve offered in the team report and example of what can be included our city and and clever responsibilities. But you need to recognize that includes an annual expense to the city also. When we think of responsibility for any of these incidents, the city has double and this is covered under our insurance plan. With our Joint Powers Authority. We do have a and have the ability to define more detail.
I we do have 1 million dollars insurance deductible basically, and that will be practical as we progress. That insurance policy costs will certainly change based upon the number and extent of insurance claims that occur over the course of time in that specific area. So while we feel that we'' re because we ' re appropriately covered from insurance policy viewpoint now, time will certainly inform with this certain location as to whether or not there'' s changes that might have a boosted our added burden to the company. If we move forward with this. And if we'' re successful, among the parts we intend to take into consideration is asking for not just the typical expansion from the administrative law judge, which the peuc commonly provides a two-year extension.And that ' s
what the last 2 expansions have actually been. Acknowledging we have a financial shortage. Also identifying that ought to we succeed coming to shared contract, this particular project would be very give worthy, but there'' s times at any time we handle competitive gives. We we would likely need even more time from the administrative law court to finish this the means an expansion is written. All work has actually to be finished in the crossing needs to be activated by the end of the extension in order to abide with the that they'' ve laid out. I desire to simply I simply wanted to supply you that extra information so that I'' ve been clear on. Where the job currently rests and several of the additional elements should we succeed moving on? And with that, Madam Errol, hand it back to you Adam and I are below to respond to any type of concerns. Thanks. Thank you for the discussion, yet additionally. Thanks. For all the working hours that >> > > you both have taken into to bringing this to today. And I understand that there'' s a lot of their staff that have also aided him been sustained a sight to so I would certainly such as to say thanks to them.Also.
> > Looking to council to see if there any type of questions council Cookie. >> > > Thank you really a lot, Madam To ensure that two-year expansion and and what are the effects? So let'' s say. 2 years.'And and we ' re 85 % full at work. What was the consequence of that? >> > > My idea is if we'' re in that position where submitting a request for the management legislation judge to prolong showing progress, I put on'' t see that they ' re mosting likely to deny us and extension of that. If in 2 years we have not begun. That'' s where my issue is. Is it for remaining to work out in one kind or another or if we'' re waiting on meeting a funding? That'' s where my location of worry is. And I and I and I wear'' t have an excellent feeling from the job that I'' ve had with the admin or that the experiences I'' ve had with the administrative legislation courts regarding whether or not they will certainly continue to bolster added extensions.And in simply one extra remark, I mean, if if the 2 entities involved a conference of the minds, > > they are normally two-year extensions >>. But when we enter front of Court Kelly in the not too remote future, if it shows up that we are close to, we have a meeting of the minds. We will request and extension well past 2 years. So we put on ' t come under that placement. > > In regards to the legal charges, can you verify >> for me that while we would certainly be liable lawful fees, we have no control over the lawful group. > > That is definitely real. And as I indicated, councilmember what >> they control the lawsuits, that ' s how their agreement is written and they ' re there is and inherent'problem of passion for my workplace. My litigation group to safeguard smart. They would never enable it. So they will. We will certainly have to settle on that they select as there litigators to protect any kind of theoretical claim.But they will certainly control that lawsuits group and we will be paying the products for. And as we talked about lacking any type of
last determination of unyielding transgression or negligent transgression under their arrangement has actually prepared we ' re going to pay any judgment. And one more issue that I have from a risk viewpoint is. Their legal representatives that the city is spending for are controlling that item lawsuits. And as a fellow litigator, if I know that my customer clever, if the handwriting is on the law that requisite court, that it shows up that the conclusion is going to be that they claim was triggered by smarts, gross carelessness or unyielding misbehavior they ' ll resolve the instance before we get the willful misconduct or reckless determination and we can ' t control that in which case. It in practically every situation we would be paying not just lawyers fees and litigation prices, but any settlement, bad judgment. > > Okay. When you know that, in your experience as a what constraints you put on yourself. Further fighting for perhaps a just settlement. That ' s what you assume you could obtain is too pricey to pursue. And by that, I imply, if that constraint doesn ' t exist for clever due to the fact that they ' re not paying the expense are they will certainly in your experience as a litigator. What does that sort of free theoretically of the litigation litigators for wise approximately reach they desire, even also it ' s for a dollar extra. > > I imply, frankly, concept with indemnity courses all the time since I-30 year plus litigator and you know what, Jason? I are aware, although he ' s managing the general supervisor, we understand that the clever lawyers are crafting the arrangement and I recognize down the I ' ve been doing this for years. Therefore I believe it ' s crystal clear why they consisted of the language that they did, which is so extremely frustrating to me as a litigator in someone'who defends the rate of interests of the city and whoever the city pays to safeguard wise facilities is going to take the very same when it come to their customer, wise against the interest of the city.Yeah, I think what I ' m trying to get at is is is. > > As you claim, if somebody else is paying the products, which I value the dual entendre there, the pun there with paying the > > if somebody else is paying it, we > > Then who cares? If you take much longer work even more or whatever, due to the fact that your customers not paying someone> else ' s? Is that sensible That is a sensible presumption and I would certainly really hope in my globe that invest the least amount to obtain the >> appropriate outcome. I am I have some actual >> problems the way this agreement is drafted. They have to do what ' s in the ideal interest of clever if lawyer is standing for the rate of interest of smart. Currently. They may likewise intend to acquire attorney ' s charges also. And as Jason showed, under our joint pool, fortunately is it will certainly cover any kind of and all insurance claims connected to this going across. However due to the fact that of the truth we have a one-million-dollar self-insured retention.But like, for instance, when I ' m prosecuting on part of the city. I ' m not. Charging the city lawyer'' s charges, however when outdoors guidance does that gnaws at the 1 million bucks S I R so for instance, in a theoretical case where we need to employ outside advise to protect outside and smart advice invests half a million dollars in attorneys fees. There ' s just half a million bucks left of the city ' s as IR. The concern is that the pool, as Jason claimed, our pool like any kind of joint powers swimming pool. They look Just how lots of cases is an entity in their swimming pool getting and what ' s the value of those claims? . It is mosting likely to be extra claims. There ' s going to be high payouts because the attorneys costs is going'to reduce right into a good portion of the city'' s underline 1 Million. that might increase our prices considerably with our pool. If you ' re defining is a loss proportion appearance at the legislations are a show. > >'Exactly how much cash we ' re getting rich is just how much you ' re'paying out.Very usual insurance coverage carrier point to do. Absolutely. I ' m at I assume our community is extremely well'aware of how common that is for insurance policy carry to do that. So you said I intend to be clear. You said our losses will be covered. Well, the lawful costs be covered. Have you validated that? Because those are 2 different things. Lawful'fees are not losses. >
> Beat due to the fact that we have confirmed that our swimming pool cover any kind of claims related to this crossing if it is built? Yes, the attorneys fees are covered. It exposes the swimming pool to higher payments due to the reality that again, I won ' t be able to defend clever. So our our million Siar would just be for like expert expenses, however as a result of the truth that we will certainly need to pay outside guidance, that ' s> going to occupy a lot of what the city needs to spend for the first million more pay out by the swimming pool, higher prices that we ' re going to suffer as a repercussion. > > All right. And seeing no added concerns from council members city attorney. Did you have something to say? > > I was simply mosting likely to to what has because city lawyer Adam Able said regarding the prices we would certainly have in that situation where we have preserved outdoors guidance to stand for wise. We would certainly not have control that we would usually have more than outside that the city hires periodically where we can assess the bells and really ensure the bill is being managed.The solutions are being managed. We would not have that capability. Our only recourse would really be a cost disagreement where we would need to verify to the court the charges were not practical. Therefore they would require to show that their charges within the array of being sensible, which looks a lot different than having the ability to go with and really manage to So it isn ' t without boundaries. A council participant. They can ' t just bill anything they desire and hand is the bill.There would be reasonableness requirement on those bells.
However once more, it ' s a quite difficult requirement since we wouldn ' t remain in the placement to be truly able to examine them. Evaluation the entries. And actually, we most likely would likewise be in the litigation. And so we they would certainly be litigating possibly versus us. And so we would additionally have the of safeguarding the city, which would either be interior the city and the group attorney ' s office outside advise. So we basically would be footing expense for for both defenses.
> >. I ' m not going to be unreasonable.Billings. What I ' m claiming remains in insurance asserts Houston location where we ' re not gon na spend$'20,000 to obtain $50,000. However if you ' re not pay the bill for that$ 20,000, the it ' s a totally free$ 50,000. > > That ' s a real they recognize Councilmember McDonald, thanks, Mayor. I just have an inquiry therefore I lost my train of believed it ' s getting also It was around the lawyer'costs, yet that ' s Need to miss it ' s. > > We will certainly come back remarks and to wrap it up after public comment. So with that, Madam City Staff, me please assist in public comment.' Thanks. We are now taking public remark on product 15.3. If you ' re in the council chamber would like to make remark however'have not yet supplied your name or a speaker card. Please make your means to the >> podium. You ' ll have 2 minutes in a countdown. Timer will notify at the end of that duration. For speaker will certainly be Victor, complied with by James than Alexa. Victor, you in the area. All right. >> James relocate to you. Please. Go ahead.James. > > Thanks. I ' m sorry. I thought another person was before me. I ' m James I ' ve been a party in support of the city in the underlying CPU see proceeding given that 2015. I have composed virtually 14 briefs to preserve the city ' s standing to build the crossing against the resistance of Smart and the CPSC staff who desired a crossing in a railway and the west location closed exchange for Jennings. That was their only factor. I urge you to have confidence in the cpc ' s judge.He ' s not only the current court the city ' s proceeding. He ' s additionally the court in a case that on my how once again, smart, which is beyond the scope of the conversation this night. So I would root cause of to follow up with your Recommendation B, send it to wise. Smart. Doesn ' t like You can clarify to the cpc ' s judge to his satisfaction. What ' s taking place below and he carry out activity to fix the circumstance. Also, you ought to be clear that the judge can not hack unilaterally. The payment itself, the 5 participants selected by the guv are the ones who make the decision. It'' s unlikely provided the patterns over time that they ' re mosting likely to knuckle under to clever system. it ' s extremely possible that in the short-term it will exercise much better for the city even worse for sparred and in the long-term, the citizens of Santa Rosa may determine they put on ' t requirement difficult and wise be more.If the way Spartz board is going to deal with residents right here. Thank > > Thank you. The following speaker will be Alexa followed by Chris. heiress. I am chosen. I need to utilize the file video camera which I ' ve never done before. > > Okay. I imply, I just over and after that it must turn up below on the screen and you simply need to concentrate it. There ' s a little focus toggle. Okay. Regarding that hold-up. I know we ' ve all been here for any can flip on the light right at the leading near > > There you go. That was actually on illegible. Just how do I'focus I ' ll.
someone know how to use that. Thank you so a lot. There >> ' s a focus switch on their I don ' t recognize if it ' s on > > Winds get on the the base of the unit that will certainly bring it right into instance that the yet >> this is focused. obtained it. I want many thanks. It was certainly you thanks. Hi, I ' m Alexa for Bikeable Santa Rose.Good night, Vice'mayor and council. > > I intend to just share a pair maps that we ' re in the discussion and likewise say thanks to the personnel of the unbelievable work that they ' ve done supporting for the city at this. This is a stretch of the smart tracks. These are the 2 crossings that currently exist. This is where there'' s currently no going across in Jennings. Both of these get on our high injury network, which indicates that if we ask individuals to stroll or ride their bikes there, they ' re most likely to obtain harmed. And so there ' s really not secure crossing even a mile out of the way >>. I intended to contrast that to this same size of track just southern of college to 3rd Street. There are 4 at quality crossings. It ' s truly hard for us to approve debates that this going across would certainly be harmful when these 4 crossings are safe. This is flexibility oppression show up the area of the city is complimentary to stir their neighborhood.This area of the city is not. And if you doubt that individuals need to utilize this crossing, certainly, there ' s cutting community on one side and there ' s times of solutions, restaurants target with house items. I simply want to focus on one destination. This is the risk-free paths to college develops these maps where the pupils that attend various institutions live. This Ellen Lehman Grade School. This mores than 50 grade school children that live to the eastern of the tracks and presently have no safe method to walk or ride to school. When we state we desire this going across, it ' s like
stating we intend to eat.Yeah, we wanted. We additionally require it. People need to be able to to relocate and clever has enforced a'one mile lengthy barrier on our neighborhood and they need to take responsibility for that. However U.S. leaders can not going across and it ' s not a wall surface. need. Thank you. > > So Idaho, remark prepared regarding exactly how important the crossing is. You people understand that our whole project exist to develop a sensible network for different transportation in the city. This is a truly essential connection. I won ' t belabor that. I ' m not a lawyer, but I ' m an individual. I ' m an adult. This'arrangement is a large middle finger from wise. And I don ' t think that they have stayed with the spirit of the contract assistant city manager, not general Cummins. So I think it ' s sensible to remain to discuss. I understand the council ' s in a truly challenging placement >>, but I assume it ' s really bad national politics for the city and for wise to neglect what the neighborhood is asking for here.It is not unreasonable. We ' ve helped it for one decade. We need to keep helping it. We absolutely need to not offer up and allow'them to bully us right into entry. So I wear ' t understand just how we arrive, yet I believe we have to keep battling. I additionally want to motivate the council. There ' s a great deal of speak about safety and security with this. I discover a great deal of the cases that clever makes concerning security, specious for the factors Alexa simply highlighted, individuals could go into the track at any of those other crossings and obtain eliminated 2 miles down the track. To ensure that ' s insane.
There ' s a great deal of talk concerning the price. And when I made remarks earlier on the influence charges, I said we ought to believe systemically. I believe that is true in this instance. So yes, we can avoid the migraine and the cost of this crossing. However if we offer up and we put on ' t have this crossing, we ' re going to have several, many even more migraines, several, a lot more prices in particular.This is not simply regarding individuals who move throughout that track. People all throughout town will gain from this going across due to the lowered traffic worry on our roads, which cost us millions and numerous bucks a year that'we do not have so developing this going across, creating a sensible network is a method to make our city job much better for all homeowners, not just people because Thanks. > > Thanks. The following speakers heiress. Harris Weaver as executive supervisor of Sonoma Area Bike Coalition. I obtain it concerns regarding responsibility. We were intimidated with a lawsuit in the previous year and it was a it was a pretty
pretty traumatic point and I ' ve been following this and being included with given that 2017. I assume you ' re entirely practical in submitting the revised arrangement that ' s extra favorable to the city. That ' s a lot more reasonable. And see what occurs with Yet for the life of me, I still can not understand why. Of the CPU C > > choices I sat in some steps. Hearings satisfied with among the previous administrative law >>. Judges. I don ' t get just how wise even is enabled to state no to this. Offered several of those previous judgments. I prompt you to not stop not go with choice 3 to send the changed variation and all certainly be doing part to affect clever to do the appropriate thing here and quit obstructing this as has actually been formerly mentioned.This going across is frantically needed. Their arguments are illogical. Their demands of the U R sensible. And please just still let them escape it. > > Don ' t let them get away with this.
The going across application and we will be back at him square one where we were in 2015 and I don'' t feel that if we can ' t come to an arrangement, I put on ' t really feel like we wait for that. They'' re going to hire the service providers and we ' re going to pay them for the solutions that they ' re specialists are offering at this certain location. I prompt you to have confidence in the cpc ' s judge.He ' s not just the current judge the city ' s continuing. And if you question that people need to utilize this crossing, of training course, there ' s reducing town on one side and there ' s times of services, dining establishments target with home items. If we provide up and we wear ' t have this going across, we ' re going to have several, many more frustrations, lots of, many more prices in particular.This is not just about the people who move across that track.We have Sonoma Region Tourist Center is a Metro Chamber and see Santa Rosa have actually all notified this document and truly what we ' re attempting to do is straighten language, understand regionally, how we ' re moving things in tandem. We did studies to understand'what the community wanted to see in this We received over 600 respondents in that survey was carried out both in English and Spanish in the styles normally from business proprietors and residents wouldn ' t actually we ' re focusing on real estate cost. And I wear ' t believe that ' s a surprise with what we ' ve seen come up in other locations as the following concern.
It ' s not because they ' re lazy. It'' s since it ' s required? And truly we ' re focusing on 3 major columns that you ' ll see is the style of this catch strategy. We did studies to understand'what the community desired to see in this We obtained over 600 respondents in that survey was carried out both in English and Spanish in the themes typically from organization owners and residents wouldn ' t truly we ' re prioritizing housing cost. And I don ' t assume that ' s a shock with what we ' ve seen come up in other locations as the following priority.> > And I ' ll simply as my last remarks that this it ' s hard to think regarding a lot more important for the city right currently for all the conversation that we ' re having about about budget plan problems. Another substantial goal that will educate just how we perform involvement is that we ' re attempting to fulfill individuals where they gather already not invite people to come out to satisfy me.That ' s where we ' re at and you ' ll see example, in some of the events that are consisted of in the strategy itself. And then finally, as was pointed out earlier birthday designating will certainly have a presence at Planet Will be showcasing the selection of intending initiatives that are happening throughout the city, consisting of the South ' s center ' s of Suffolk Plant.As component of the involvement for this procedure, we ' re going to adhere and engagement consultatory committee and this will certainly be a neighborhood of interested celebrations that the occupants individuals doing organization in the South Sooners, a strategy area This will inevitably represent their neighborhoods and with any luck bring others into the procedure that we wouldn ' t necessarily have straight accessibility to.
> > And I ' ll simply as my final remarks that this it ' s hard to assume regarding a lot more essential for the city right now for all the conversation that we ' re having concerning around budget problems. I want to wish no blood, but I ' m sure there ' s Mason, Sweat and tears into So I really do value it. We ' re attempting to highlight that the city ' s approach to engagement shows a dedication and a partnership to prepare with the neighborhood and not for the area. Another big objective that will educate just how we conduct involvement is that we ' re attempting to satisfy individuals where they collect already not invite individuals to come out to satisfy me.That ' s where we ' re at and you ' ll see example, in some of the events that are included in the strategy itself. And then ultimately, as was discussed earlier birthday celebration designating will certainly have an existence at Earth Will certainly be showcasing the selection of planning initiatives that are happening throughout the city, including the South ' s center ' s of Suffolk Plant.As component of the interaction for this process, we ' re going to adapt and engagement advising committee and this will be a neighborhood of interested parties that the tenants people doing organization in the South Sooners, a strategy location This will inevitably represent their areas and hopefully bring others right into the procedure that we wouldn ' t necessarily have direct access to.> > Per se would be looking at 4 > > giving ins area. > > So > > once again, the park dental implant the par growth costs that are they are all alloted >
>> > so there aren ' t. > > If if we were to. Change this out and possibly I ' m looking over right here and I ' m I ' m seeing responds and I put on ' t recognize if we ' re if that ' s specifically what what we ' re going to do.
> > Per se would be looking at 4 > > concessions location. > > I ' m delighted I discovered it. > > So > > once more, the park dental implant the par advancement charges that are they are all allocated >
>> > so there aren ' t. > > If if we were to. Switch this out and possibly I ' m looking over below and I ' m I ' m seeing nods and I don ' t recognize if we ' re if that ' s specifically what what we ' re going to do. > > Where we ' ve last reported on it and they ' ll be spoiler alert.> > Is 9.8% rise per Santa Rosa. > > Madam City staff me please call the vote. > > Thank Relocating to item in total of which is our authorization minutes.
> > Is 9.8% increase per Santa Rosa. > > Rogers? > > I would certainly be myself. > > Madam City clerk me please call the vote. > > Give thanks to Moving to thing in overall of which is our approval minutes.