the landed range program aims to reinforce important land governance parts for males ladies and youth to contribute to architectural comprehensive and just sustainable change at range in lower and center earnings countries areas and landscapes this program is sustained by the ministry of foreign events of the netherlands and the netherlands venture firm knowledge management is vital to the effective implementation of the landed range program it is developed in an extensive and adaptive method that incorporates documentation knowing and sharing understanding management suggests generating modern insights to reinforce interventions connecting to make relevant knowledge readily available to the ideal individuals at the correct time and sharing lessons learned in the program with a broad target market in this collection of short videos we explore three vital facets of the understanding administration program within land at range these are flexible programming south exchange and tracking and examination each of the video clip offers evidence and insights from specialists working in the land governance market this video clip is concentrated on tracking and assessment and how it associates with knowledge administration tracking and examination is utilized to assess the efficiency of projects with the goal of improving existing and future administration of results end results and influences in this video clip professionals address a variety of inquiries that offer understandings in their experiences um ilc has a mixed m e system allow'' s say we gauge influence uh primarily via our landex initiative and after that we have our corporate tracking and assessment in which we report mostly on changes in plans and techniques and in doing so we stabilize both qualitative and quantitative info and use them both to tell our tales evaluate our results and check them in the past training we have presented our payment evaluation that we normally do on uh country level efforts namely our nationwide interaction approaches so for initiatives that have an effect at nation degree let'' s state and we do these uh we have embarked on these to'far better map ioc ' s contribution to changes in policies and techniques for people centered land administration that is our goal and we likewise do them to obtain this summary that we discover with this evaluation identified and verified by a bigger audience that is generally the platform that carries out the national interaction method and in doing so this evaluation generally we offer additionally lessons found out as well as challenges on ways to progress additionally so i said we kind of balance both measurable and qualitative descriptions of modification because as we understand when it involves advocacy policy modification numbers count but they need to be counterbalanced by a summary of those numbers and that is specifically what we attempt to do in terms you you certainly need a mix of quantitative and and qualitative for for expertise management there are particular quantitative signs that you can make use of as a as an entry factor yet i would certainly significantly warn that they ought to be entry factors just and not just taken um you recognize taken as a procedure by themselves so placed even more favorably you require to make certain that those quantitative indicators are actually recording the um your target audience i believe that is one concern i believe the you understand one of the obstacles that we constantly face is what level do you set for your measurable signs i mean um you can you have particular referral factors um in you recognize in communication success as as land website is much better than than anyone really um that you can have um you recognize uh average figures that you can use as reference factors yet i think it'' s extremely tough to evaluate you understand what what kind of target you must be setting i assume that qualitative signs are you know are especially crucial in terms of people'' s action endorsement of uh of the knowledge that you have actually been creating it can be a challenge to establish that system we had uh an emini log where we would certainly place in you understand we we would archive every every e-mail that was available in with an endorsement or a favorable recommendation but then we needed to adhere to that up with with studies you recognize targeted at at particularly essential groups and stakeholders um to inquire to to react about how useful they had located the expertise created and one of the troubles there in fact is is is always people'' s restricted capacity to respond you know offered their other pressures the job the extent of job we are doing is very intricate in the feeling that you can not utilize one technique to to resolve the issue you require a triangulation you require to bring our blended method you require to even more quantitative and a lot more qualitative and it is really remarkable to see just how qualitative information highlight some annoyance in an important discovery searching for on what we are doing we measure perception we determine level of participation which are it gives you more a narrative on exactly how these numbers like for instance variety of hectares variety of communities are developed all right became simply the number without the explanation behind where these numbers are from and exactly how and what it'' s not sufficient it is trivial to provide you the full um story of the fact happening on the ground we have uh established this technique let'' s state that we call payment analysis in which we assess what occurs in a country or in a provided initiative and these contribution analysis were thought and were made to have a reflection workshop with the systems with the actors of those systems to pick up from their achievements but additionally on the difficulties and to use those lessons discovered for future preparation unfortunately on considering that concealed hits the platform has actually been mostly taken part in verifying the outcomes that we have been seeing as opposed to really taking part in these reflection uh workshops so with this new method and with the brand-new strat m e technique and system that is starting uh next year we will certainly further reinforce this cycle where we wish to work together more with discovering more with uh with interactions but we have actually likewise included understanding administration in this cycle since we see in our experience that the m e info and data and also the evaluation that includes it is the beginning indicate lastly then get a better interaction to a larger target market on what ielts achieves what the obstacles were and more that as i stated we experience learning and assessing those obstacles and exactly how to sort of enhance in the future however we also consist of currently in these payment evaluation that are central to our system allow'' s state we include knowledge administration as part of the exercise in further analyzing what appears and what exists in the contribution analysis and which great technique emerged from them so that they can be even more made use of in various other learning exercises and exchanges in between systems for instance it belongs to our strategy and [Music] we are now establishing an integrated method to ensure that it can be strongly integrated monitoring and discovering and knowledge advancement we have the the framework that has been created which regrettably i can not it'' s hard to share with you throughout this meeting so you see the various components and now we remain in the this next phase is to truly integrate it however considering that we the real center was still very young organization growing we began piloting this in a hot way and trying to collect several of the data and seeing how it can function and after that currently it is the time now we are simplifying and incorporating it and into the system i often tend to go back again to these payment analysis because these are truly our main uh allow'' s claim m e work uh in which we truly attempt to connect uh those contribution evaluation workshops these representation minutes two intending minutes which implies that we have an initially a moment in which uh members together sit and reflect on the outcomes they have actually accomplished and likewise on the challenges they have dealt with and the obstacles and more to make use of uh those representations in further preparation to adapt what they plan to what they what is has been arising from the past also uh in general um this payment analysis that our evaluations of what we do absorb consideration longer timespan so for example in many cases even the whole life of an effort that can increase to 10 years and this in doing these evaluation you plainly see that little setbacks can still become part of an effective story so especially when it pertains to policy influencing ensuring that those policies get implemented it takes such a lengthy time framework to in fact see adjustment taking place that no setback is really a problem um it actually begins with having a connection of trust fund and a great deal of transparency and continual discussion i believe if job implementers feel that they can speak to the the task supervisors from the funders side uh very honestly about what is what is taking place and can show that they are you know they'' re doing their utmost to uh to implement the project properly then having that partnership of depend on makes it makes it possible to to to have a secure room i think to chat about what is failing and what is not and i assume one means of actually helping to set up that connection and be very clear about assumptions is having you understand solid um you understand factor sensible amount of time for the inception period no task is being penalized for not being accomplished a target in the feeling that telugu security is not an objective it is really crucial for us to recognize this that'' s why in some we speak about advancing tenure it'' s a process and when you simplify as a process based signs and look at what has been attained within that 2 years towards the new protection after that you we have a great deal of information a great deal of data a great deal of ideal techniques that you can package and knowledge items uh ielts has actually been um creating great practices and requesting excellent methods from its participant for participants from a long period of time so when in m e we do our evaluation or our assessments we always utilize uh these excellent techniques as part of the wealth of details that is essential to understand uh what our participants have actually been doing country degree or in their efforts so definitely these are constantly a resource these excellent practices from our members are always a resource for details when it comes to our examinations we have um gathered greater than 150 good methods that become part of a data source that is readily available to every person the database of great techniques intends at gathering vital materials that can notify participants and other individuals of the work of our participants and likewise notify individuals concerning what our members have actually done to overcome specific obstacles so the focus is on the devices the procedures and the methods that they have actually come up with and applied to improve their circumstance at country level to get over details difficulties and to accomplish people-centered land governance while specific procedures can be abstracted and later on duplicated by others um they are commonly fairly context specific therefore it'' s vital additionally to explain the context in which they were um they were executed a really concrete example is that in in tale we did an extensive evaluation of land tenure regularization at scale so exactly how to um boost you understand improve period protection at scale we did a testimonial of the uk federal government'' s programs um to to regularize land period and took out some some actually strong lessons from that you know concerning the the operationalization of it um concerning the concept of change and regarding the significance of of political economic climate analysis and those lessons have been um taken forward right into the layout of the technological aid center that the uk government is is is mosting likely to launch and the choice support unit that will certainly accompany that with which has a strong certainly a strong expertise management function and a solid m d feature uh you know the lessons from that uh that report that evaluation were shared among um the series of of donors uh through the benefactor working group ashore um and having that sychronisation mechanism and and being able to route finding out to a group of funders who can talk use that then to discuss their own experiences i believe is truly is actually critical let me make use of liberia where we uh returning facility conducted the pr am a a pilot procedure there before the enactment of the land at land right regulation and during that pilot procedure all the expertise products from that pile of procedure have been extremely crucial in in in the enactment of the the the the legal framework and it is has been very currently really useful currently in the me procedure for instance during the pilot the pilot helped to establish a self-identification guide which is not the structure and the first action in the process of formalization of normal land right in liberia and this step is not really incorporated in the task me procedure and how they report on on how these the various communities are organizing self-organizing themselves following that standards in that self-identification protocol which was a a product a knowledge item from the tenure center pilot and a knowledge product that the federal government additionally get in and make it as an organization as an one of the leaguer and the regulative structure for the implementation of the land right act you
