>> > > GOOD NIGHT, WE WILL CALL THE DURHAM CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE TO ORDER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2013, AT 7:07 P.M. > > GREAT EVENING, EVERYONE. CONFIRMATION OF EVALUATION ROLL FOR WATER MAIN ON ARDMORE DRIVE >> > > ITEM 18 IS TO CARRY OUT A PUBLIC HEARING AND OBTAIN COMMENTS ON THE EVALUATION ROLL FOR WATER KEY IMPROVEMENT.STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THE VERIFICATION AS PRESENTED.
>> > > GOOD EVENING, WE WILL CERTAINLY CALL THE DURHAM CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE TO ORDER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2013, AT 7:07 P.M. > > GOOD EVENING. > > I GO TO HILL, I ' M A STUDENT. > > I GET TO REMARK? > > THANK YOU.> > THE GENT WAS REFERRING TO– > > STATE YOUR NAME. > > I WAS IN NEW YORK. > > SO WE FEELING A LOT OF SELF-CONFIDENCE.
> > THE GENTLEMAN WAS REFERRING TO– > > STATE YOUR NAME. > > NO TROUBLE. > > OK. > > THAT ' S ALREADY IN PROCEDURE. > > THAT IS WHAT I WAS LOOKING TO BE CLEAR OUT.I PRESUME WE GET A GREAT DEAL OF ADVANCEMENTS, A GREAT DEAL OF INTENDS THAT ARE BROUGHT BEFORE United States IN STIPULATIONS OF PREPARATION AND POINTS THAT WILL CERTAINLY OCCUR. I HAVE BEEN KIND OF INTRIGUED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT. SINCE THIS IS NEW TO OUR COMMUNITY IN STIPULATIONS OF A GREAT DEAL OF GROWTH AND FOLLOWERS. CONTAINER YOU REMIND United States AS TO HOW GUY UNITS ARE PREPARED FOR THIS? >> > > 1,314. I BELIEVE WE GO TO 1,300 NOW. WITH WHAT WE HAVE ON PAPER. SITE PREPARES HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR REGARDING 2/3 OF IT. 750. AND IF IF YOU KEEP IN MIND, THERE ARE SEVERAL PARCELS THAT ARE STILL UNDER A POSTPONEMENT THAT WE CAN'' T SUBMIT A WEBSITE INTEND ON QUITE YET. BUT PHASE ONE HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED. THE FACILITIES IS IN LOCATION. AND IT IS FOR 220-SOME-ODD DEVICES. REGIONAL PUMP STATION FOR BASE 25 IS BEING CONSTRUCTED. >> > > YOU HAD I WEAR'' T KNOW IF IT IS A RIBBON CUTTING OR OPEN RESIDENCE OR WHATEVER A FEW WEEKS AGO IN WHICH PEOPLE CAME OUT TO LOOK? >> > > WE HAD AN OPEN RESIDENCE. I WASN'' T INVITED TO IT. THAT IS An INDIVIDUAL DIG AT MY CLIENT.THERE WAS AN OPEN HOUSE EXPECTING ABOUT A THOUSAND INDIVIDUALS TO THE PUBLIC TO INTRODUCE THE DEL WEBB CAROLINA ARBORS TO THEM. OVER 2500 PEOPLE ENDED UP TURNING UP. MASS MAYHEM. > > WELL, I THOUGHT THAT WAS IMPRESSIVE TO SEE THOSE SORT OF NUMBERS FOR A PROJECT THAT IS BEING SUGGESTED. I ' M SURE THE SIGNATURE NAME DEL WEBB HAD QUITE A LITTLE BIT TO PERFORM WITH IT. THE REALITY THAT IT IS RIGHT HERE IN DURHAM, WE EAGERLY ANTICIPATE IT AT SOME POINT OPENING. I BELIEVED IT WAS EXTREMELY OUTSTANDING TO ME THAT YOU HAVE THAT LOTS OF PEOPLE COME OUT TO LOOK AT SOMETHING PLANNED AND PROPOSED FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD. > > THANKS, MAYOR. ONE LITTLE AD. IF YOU GO OUT TO CAROLINA ARBORS. >> YOU WILL CERTAINLY SEE A SALES CENTER. DO NOT THINK THAT IS THE CLUBHOUSE.THAT IS THE CLUB OF MANY REGULAR RESIDENTIAL UNITS THIS DIMENSION. THAT IS A SHORT-LIVED CONDITION. IT WILL BE REMOVED. WE ' RE CURRENTLY OBTAINING APPROVALS ON A CLUB THAT I 38,000 SQUARE FEET. BOTH INDOOR AND OUTDOOR SWIMMING POOLS, RUNNING AREA, TRACK ABOVE IT, GYM. IT IS A TOTAL PLAN. IT IS NOT– IT IS NOT YOUR NORMAL RESIDENTIAL GROWTH. > > WELL, THANKS. I ASSUMED IT WAS IMPRESSIVE TO ME. I WANTED TO SHARE THAT IN WHAT IS BEING RECOMMENDED. > > I WANT TO SAY THANKS TO THE COUNCIL AND STAFF. BOTH HAVE WORKED EXCEPTIONALLY DIFFICULT >> IN OBTAINING United States TO THIS POINT TODAY. I WANT TO THANKS PERSONALLY. > > OK. I DELIGHT A MOVEMENT ON THE THING. EFFECTIVELY MOVED AND SECONDED. MADAM CLERK, OPEN THE VOTE. SHUT THE BALLOT. > > IT PASSES 6-0. > > OK.
>> I ' M GOING TO >> RELOCATE– RATHER OF GOING TO PRODUCT 25, I DESIRED TO MOV TO PRODUCT 26. 26. COMBINED ADDITION ITEM: 2207 WEB PAGE ROAD WATER TOWE >> > > MANY THANKS, MR. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. RUB YOUNG ONCE AGAIN WITH THE INTENDING DEPARTMENT. THIS IS THE CONSOLIDATED ADDITION ITEM PERTAINING TO THE PROPOSED CITY OF DURHAM WATER TOWER 2207 PAGE ROADWAY. IT INCLUDES A VOLUNTEER ADDITION PETITION AND INITIAL ZONING TO RURAL RESIDENTIAL, WHICH IS THE LEAST INTENSE ZONING IN THE GROWTH RATE TO PERMIT THE RECOMMENDED USAGE. STAFF ADVISES THE COUNCIL ACCEPT THE VOLUNTEER ADDITION. 2207 WEB PAGE WATER TOWER AND ENJOY TO SOLUTION INQUIRIES. >> > > PUBLIC HEARING. I ASK FIRST, IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS BY MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL? OTHERWISE, ANY INDIVIDUAL IN THE GENERAL PUBLIC WANT TO REPRESENT OR AGAINST? NOBODY IN THE PUBLIC ASKED TO SPEAK.I STATE THE
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. MATTER IS PRIOR TO THE COUNCIL. PROPERLY MOVED AND SECONDED. OPEN THE VOTE. SHUT THE BALLOT. >> > > PASSES 6-0. WE RELOCATION TO ITEM 25. THE LAST THING ON THE AGENDA. 25. ZONING MAP CHANGE-CAROLINA CROSSING II (Z1200004) >> > > FOR THE LAST TIME TONIGHT, RUB YOUTHFUL. IT IS A REQUEST TO MODIFICATION THE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS OF 5.033 PARCEL ON FERRINGTON ROADWAY. FROM THE EXISTING CLASSIFICATION OF RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN 20 TO OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL WITH An ADVANCEMENT STRATEGY. THIS RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IS IN THE SUV TRANSIT AREA. THE DEMAND IS CONSTANT WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF THE EXTENSIVE STRATEGY. VARIOUS OTHER ADOPTED STATUTES and policies. THERE ASK A GROWTH PLAN CONNECTED WITH THIS INSTANCE THAT INCLUDE DEDICATIONS. NOT LIMITED TO ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS, PER THE SUGGESTION OF THE WEBSITE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND LONG-RANGE BICYCLE PLAN. AND A COMMITMENT TO LIMITATIONS OF USES TO TWO WORKPLACE STRUCTURES PURSUANT TO THE COMPACT COMMUNITY TIER REQUIREMENTS.
STAFF IDENTIFIES THIS DEMAND I CONSTANT WITH THE THOROUGH STRATEGY AND OTHER ADOPTED PLANS AND STATUTES AT THEIR JULY 9, 2013, CONFERENCE, THE SUGGESTION OF THE DENIA 8-4. I WILL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS? >> > > THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. I STATE THE GENERAL PUBLIC HEARING HOPE.– PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. IF STAFF HAS QUESTIONS, I ASK. I HAVE FOUR INDIVIDUALS SIGNED UP T SPEAK– ALLOW ME TO BACK UP. 3 INDIVIDUALS REGISTERED TO SPEA ON BEHALF OF THE PRODUCT. EXISTS ANYONE ELSE THAT WISHED TO TALK ON BEHALF OF THE THING TRYING TO OBTAIN A FEELING OF TIMING? IF YOU DON'' T MIND, COULD YOU GO TO THE STAFF'' S WORKDESK AND OBTAIN A CARD, PLEASE.
SO I HAVE FOUR PERSONS AUTHORIZED U TO SPEAK IN ASSISTANCE. I HAVE TWO PERSONS THAT ARE SUBSCRIBED TO SPEAK IN– LET ME BACK UP. I HAVE ROSEMARY KITCHEN. IS SHE PRESENT? ARE YOU IN SUPPORT OR AGAINST? YOU'' RE IN SUPPORT? TO MAKE SURE THAT MAKES 5. I HAVE ONE PERSON AUTHORIZED UP TO TALK AGAINST THIS PRODUCT. THAT IS VAN NOR. IS THERE ANY PERSON ELSE THAT WISHED TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS PRODUCT? YOU REMAIN IN OPPOSITION? PERMIT ME TO REDO MY NUMBERS, THEN. MS. COOKING AREA, YOU ARE IN OPPOSITION TO IT? ARE YOU AGAINST THIS? YOU ARE IN SUPPORT OF IT? I WILL DETERMINE HOW TO PERFORM YOU. ALLOW'' S DO THIS.I WILL CERTAINLY ENABLE 15 MINS ON EACH SIDE FOR THIS THING. I CALL KEN SPALDING, CARROLL LEWELL LEWELLYN, PRIEST JACK HUGHES AN WOMAN THAT GOES TO THE WORKDESK. FOR OR AGAINST? AGAINST. OK. >> > > EXCELLENT EVENING, MR. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY BOARD, MY NAME IS KENNETH SPALDING, I STAND FOR THE APPLICANT IN THIS MATTER. THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO STICK TO THE CITY COUNCIL, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, RESIDENTS, PLANNING STAFF HAVE AGREED WOUL BE THE FINEST LAND USE FOR THIS PLACE AND THIS PROPERTY. OFFICE ESTABLISHMENT. YOUR PREPARATION STAFF HAS THOROUGHLY AND EXTENSIVELY ASSESSED THIS APPLICATION AND HAVE FOUND IT TO BE COMPLETELY REGULAR WITH EVERY ONE OF YOUR ESTABLISHED AND ENACTED POLICIES. THIS REZONING WILL CERTAINLY ADDITIONALLY ENABLE FOR THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE CHANCE WHEREIN THE PROGRAMMER WILL BE CONTRIBUTING FROM THE PRIVATE MARKET APPROXIMATELY $1 MILLION FOR SIGNIFICANT and considerable AND QUITE TRUTHFULLY, MUCH-NEEDED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. OUR TAX BASE WILL CERTAINLY BE CONSIDERABLY BOOSTED CHARGE TO THE SIGNIFICANT PAYMENT TO DURHAM'' S TAX OBLIGATION BASE. THIS REZONING AND ITS ROAD ENHANCEMENTS WILL MATCH TH LONG-RANGE PREPARES OF THE I-4054 CORRIDOR STUDY BY OFFERING AS AN ENHANCEMENT AS THE DISCUSSION PROCEEDS IN THE SUGGESTED HUB.THIS REZONING
HAS BEEN PASSED. IT HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AND OUR RESIDENT D.O.T. IN PARTICULAR, THIS REZONING WILL SUPPLY FOR EXISTING and existing RENOVATIONS AS THE STATE REMAINS TO LOCATE APPROPRIATIONS FOR ESSENTIAL ROADWAY RENOVATIONS THROUGHOUT ALL 100 COUNTIES OF THIS STATE. TO CONCLUDE WE FEEL THIS REZONING WILL CERTAINLY SUPPLY THE CITY OF DURHAM SIGNIFICANT, CURRENT BENEFITS THAT WILL BE FELT IN MANY WAYS FOR LOTS, LOTS OF YEARS AHEAD. WE RESPECTFULLY SEEK AND REQUES AUTHORIZATION OF THIS REZONING AS PER YOUR EXISTING PLANS, YOUR LAWS, AND DEVELOP DURHAM CITY BOARD LAND USAGE COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY. THANKS, WE WOULD HOPE THAT YOU WOULD LISTEN NOW TO EARL LEWELLYN WHO WILL SPEAK MOSTLY WHEN DRIVING IMPROVEMENTS WHICH ARE A CONCER AND RATE OF INTEREST TO THE CITIZENS OF THIS COMMUNITY. >> > > EXCELLENT NIGHT,'I ' M EARL LEWELLYN, TRAFFIC ENGINEER WITH KIMBERLY HORN AFFILIATE LOCATED AT 200 NORTH MAGNUM STREET RIGHT HERE IN DURHAM.
I PREPARED THE TIA WHICH HAS BEEN EVALUATED BY NCDOT AND DURHAM TRANSPORT STAFF. WE KNOW THIS LOCATION IS CONGESTED DURING PEAK HOURS. I WON'' T STAND BELOW AND INFORM YOU ANYTHING DIFFERENT THAN THAT. WHAT I WOULD LOVE TO DO IS BEGI SETTING IN POINT OF VIEW, THE EFFECT OF THIS WEBSITE. THIS WEBSITE WEB TRAFFIC WILL CERTAINLY ADD ONLY 2.7% RISE IN THE WEB TRAFFIC ON NC 54. ALONG WITH THAT 2.7% INCREASE, THE WEB TRAFFIC RESEARCH INCLUDES 6% HISTORY WEBSITE TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT. SO INHERENTLY, THE ENHANCEMENTS ADDRESS OUR SITE TRAFFIC BUT OTHER GROWTH ALSO. THE TEAM REPORT VERIFIES THAT ALL EXISTING DEGREES OF SOLUTION WILL BE MAINTAINED IN CRITICAL AREAS AND ALL JUNCTIONS WILL CERTAINLY BE OPERATING AT DEGREE SERVICE D OR BETTER AT BUILDOUT WHICH IN ITSELF IS GOOD, BUT I WOULD SUBMIT THAT THERE ARE OTHER CRUCIAL ADVANTAGES THAT AREN'' T NECESSARILY APPARENT IN DOING An EASY PRIOR TO AND AFTER CONTRASTS OF SERVICE.I WILL TALK
MORE ABOUT THAT MOMENTARILY RIGHT HERE. NC 54 CORRIDOR RESEARCH WAS CARRIED OUT TO CONDUCT LONG-RANGE TRANSPORT RENOVATIONS. THE MOST CRITICAL OF THOSE ENHANCEMENTS IS THE WONDERFUL SEPARATION OF 54 WITH FERRINGTO ROADWAY. FERRINGTON ROAD WILL CERTAINLY REVIEW NC 54. THAT– THE TRANSFORMING MOVEMENTS AT THE EXISTING INTERSECTION WILL CERTAINLY BE REDIRECTED THROUGH ENTHUSIAST STREETS TO THE NEARBY FALCON BRIDGE CROSSWAY WHERE AN INTERCHANGE WILL CERTAINLY BE CONSTRUCTED when THAT IS DONE. THAT ALONG WITH FINISHING THE SIX-LANE CROSS-SECTION ON NC 54, THOSE COSTS TOTAL CONCERNING $40 MILLION. BUT THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO FUND ABLE OF FOR THE ELEMENTS OF THE PASSAGE RESEARCH STUDY. SOMETHING THE PASSAGE RESEARCH STUDY DOES NOT DO IS RECOMMEND INTERI ENHANCEMENTS AS WE'' RE LOOKING FOR FUNDING FOR THE $40 MILLION-PLUS.
THAT IS WHAT THIS PROJECT USES. THIS EXHIBIT SIMPLY DISPLAYS IN ORANGE THE PROPOSED ENHANCEMENTS THAT THE JOB HAS COMMITTED TO. THE NEW LANE ANNUAGE REMAINS IN ORAN. THIS IS FERRINGTON ROAD ON THE EXHIBITION. WITHIN FERRINGTON ROADWAY IS A CONCRETE MEAN, SHOWN IN RED. THIS IS AN TOTAL SIGHT. WHAT I WANT TO DO IS SWIFTLY STROLL WITH THE INDIVIDUAL IMPROVEMENTS. THIS ZOOMS IN IT ON THE NC 54 FERRINGTON ROAD JUNCTION. I TRANSFORMED– I EXCUSE ALTERING THE ALIGNMENT. NC 54 NOW RUNS EAST-WEST AND THIS IS FERRINGTON ROADWAY HERE. THE EASTBOUND METHOD WE WILL BE INCREASING THE CURRENT LEFT TURN LANE FROM 175 FEET OF STORAGE TO 300 FEET OF STORAGE. ALSO, CURRENTLY TO DATE, THERE WERE THREE THROUGH LANES ON THE EASTBOUND 54. THE OUTSIDE OR SOUTHERNMOST LANE IS A SHARED VIA RIGHT TURN LANE. THE VOLUME OF THE RIGHT TURNS, WHILE SMALL, SWITCHING ON FERRINGTON ROAD IS SIMPLY SUFFICIENT THAT INDIVIDUALS TEND TO PREVENT UTILIZING THAT TO GO THROUGH THE JUNCTION. THEY DON'' T WISH TO BE DECREASED BY THE RIGHT-TURNING VEHICLES.BY CONSTRUCTING THE NEW RIGHT TURN LANE, YOU GAIN THE RIGHT TRANSFORM CAPABILITY, BUT WE ASSISTANCE REALIZE THE FULL ABILITY OF TH THROUGH LANE. REALLY SIMILAR SITUATION ON WESTBOUND I-40. THIS AGAIN IS FERRINGTON ROAD BELOW. 54 AND THIS IS THE TERMINUS OF THE EASTBOUND I-40 RAMP. BELOW, TOO, WE HAVE THREE THROUG LANES, OOPS. 3 WITH LANES, OF WHICH THE NORTHERN MANY ONE IS A SHARED WITH RIGHT TURN LANE. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IN THIS SITUATION IS THAT THERE IS A VERY HEAVY VOLUME OF RIGHT TRANSFORMS COMING FROM 54 TURNING NORTHBOUND ON THE FERRINGTON ROAD. SO NO ONE REALLY WANTS TO GET I THAT VIA LANE BECAUSE THEY ARE GOING TO BE HELD UP BY RIGHT-TURNING VEHICLES. ESSENTIALLY, WHAT YOU HAVE IS THE CAPABILITY OF 2 VIA LANES. RIGHT HERE AGAIN, ADDING THE RIGHT TRANSFORM LANE GAINS YOU RIGHT-TURN ABILITY BUT IT ENABLES YOU TO REALIZE MORE OF THE WITH MOVEMENT ABILITY THAT IS ALREADY THERE. ANOTHER THING THAT THIS DOES IS AIDS SHORTEN QUEUES BETWEEN THIS VERY BRIEF DISTANCE BETWEE THE FERRINGTON ROADWAY QUIT BAR AN EXISTING RAMP TERMINUS OF I-40. PROMPTLY SWITCH OVER TO FERRINGTON ROADWAY, WHICH RUNS NORTH-SOUTH. THIS IS 54. THIS IS CLEERA DRIVE.
THE PROJECT SITE IS HERE. YOU CAN SEE THE EXISTING CHURCH STRUCTURE. CURRENTLY TODAY, DURING THE HEAVIEST COMPONENTS OF THE PEAK HOUR, WEBSITE TRAFFIC SUPPORTS ON FERRINGTON ROAD, SOMETIMES VIA CLEORA DRIVE. IT IS PRIMARILY A RESULT OF THE HEAVY SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURNS FROM FERRINGTON HOMES, 54 HEADED TOWARD 40 AND COMPONENTS OF THE EAST WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING IS DUAL LEFT TRANSFORMS AND NATURALLY, RECONSTRUCTING THE THROUGH LANE AND THE RIGHT KIP DOWN ENHANCEMENT TO THE WEST.YOU ALSO NOTIFICATION WHAT I STATE PRIOR TO IS THAT A MEAN WILL BE CONSTRUCTED FROM 54 APPROXIMATELY CLEORA DRIVE WHICH WILL RESTRICT THIS DRIVE AND THIS DRIVE TO
RIGHT TURN MOVEMENTS ONLY. THAT MINIMIZES FRICTION. REDUCES CLASHING ACTIVITIES IN IT THE LOCATION. I SAW WEIRD AND DANGEROUS MALE UFS OUT OF BELOW when I WAS OBSERVING THE INTERSECTION. I THINK THIS WILL CERTAINLY BE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVANTAGE. SERVING THE PROJECT ITSELF WOUL BE A LEFT TURN LANE HEADED NORTHBOUND ON TO CLEORA. THIS LEFT TURN EXTENDED COMPLETELY DOWN TO 54. WE DON ' T REQUIRED THAT MUCH STORAGE BUT AS A SECURITY PREVENTATIVE MEASURE, WE ESSENTIALLY MADE THAT A LANE THAT GOES ALL THE WAY BACK TO MAINTAIN WEB TRAFFIC FROM SPLASHING BACK INTO THE JUNCTION.'> > LET ' S RETURN TO THAT SLIDE. INDIVIDUAL UPCOMING OUT OF CAROLINA CROSSING 1, GENERALLY, IF THEY WISHED TO TURN LEFT, SINCE THE MEDIAN ISN ' T THEREIN THEY CONTAINER >> COME LEFT, NOW TURN RIGHT, TURN LEFT AHEAD BACK? > > YOU ARE ASKING An EXTREMELY EXCELLENT QUESTION.PART OF THE TASK INSTITUTES GO ACROSS GAIN ACCESS TO EASEMENTS FROM THE CHARACTERISTICS TO THE SOUTH WITH THE SUGGESTED SITE UP TO CLEORA DRIVE >> SO YOU PUT ON ' T HAVE TO MAKE THOSE MOVEMENTS. > > I MENTION PEOPLE UPCOMING OUT OF CAROLINA CROSSING ON THE BUILDING ON THE RIGHT. WHEN THEY APPEARED, THEY WOULD MAKE A LEFT TURN TO COME BACK TOWARDS 54th NOW IT RESEMBLES THEY HAVE TO MAKE A RIGHT TURN, MOST LIKELY TO CLEORA AND COME BACK. > > GO TO THIS MAP. THEY HAVE TWO DRIVEWAYS THERE. THIS IS RESTRICTED TO RIGHT TURN MOVEMENTS ONLY. THE ONE TO THE NORTH IS UP RIGHT HERE THAT PERMITS FULL-MOVEMENT GAIN ACCESS TO. GREAT INQUIRY, BECAUSE WHAT WE ' RE DOING AROUND
, BECAUSE THERE WAS A LEFT TURN LANE DOWN RIGHT HERE, WHICH WE ' RE ELIMINATING, WE ' RE MOVING THAT LEFT TURN LANE TO THIS DRIVE TO OFFER IT BETTER FOR THIS HOME YOU POINTED OUT ON THE EAST SIDE OF FERRINGTON ROAD. IN ENHANCEMENT THROUGH THIS AREA, WE ' RE OFFERING 4-FOOT BIKE LANE THROUGH THE WIDENING, WHICH PROLONGS CONCERNING A THOUSAND PHOTO.ALSO SUGGESTING TO ADD– THE CURSOR GO? THE CROSSWALK AND PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS AT THE 54-FERRINGTON CROSSWAY. THOSE WILL BE SUBJECT TO NCDOT APPROVAL AND THE STYLE WOULD B TOPIC TO THEIR AUTHORIZATION. > > SIR, COULD YOU INCLUDE A LITTLE EVEN MORE REGARDING THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS AND SIGNIFYING THERE? ARE THEY GON NA BE ON BOTH SIDES AND GO BOTH INSTRUCTIONS? HOW WILL THAT WORK? > > I ASSUME THAT IS A CONCERN FOR NCDOT. ONE OF THE PROBLEMS I WOULD LATER ON YOU TO RIGHT NOW IS I WOULD SUGGEST NOT PUTTING A CROSSWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF FERRINGTON ROAD ACROSS 54. WHAT THAT DOES IS SHORTEN THIS PILING RANGE. WHICH IS REALLY CRITICAL. BETWEEN THE I-40 >> RAMP AND FERRINGTON ROAD. WE COULD PROVIDE CROSSWALKS ON THIS SIDE OF IT HERE, AND ON WEST SIDE, AND THROUGHOUT FERRINGTO ROADWAY. I PUT ON ' T SEE TROUBLES KEEPING THAT. DID THAT ANSWER YOUR INQUIRY? > > COULD YOU STAND UP? TELL ME WHO OWNS THE RIGHT OF WAY CONCERNING THE AREAS YOU ARE DISCUSSING MAKING? > > DIFFICULT TO SEE. THE EXISTING RIGHT OFWAY PER CITY OF DURHAM GIK PROLONGS WITH HERE, UP THIS LINE AND ALL THE WAY OFF THE WEB PAGE ON THI SIDE. THE POINT BEING IT ' S A VERY WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THAT ' S CONCERNING THE CLOSEST PINCH POINT THAT WE HAVE RIGHT THERE. THERE IS ENOUGH RIGHT-OF-WAY TO DO THE RENOVATIONS. > > WHICH SUGGESTS YOU DON ' T NEED TO ACQUISITION IT, IT IS ALREADY THERE? > > THAT ' S CORRECT. > > OK. > > THAT OPTS FOR THE RENOVATIONS ALONG FERRINGTON AND THOSE ALONG 54. > > OK.
COUNCILMAN MOFFAT? > > SORRY TO KEEP INTERRUPTING YOUR DISCUSSION. > > THAT ' S PENALTY. > > DO I COMPREHEND WHAT YOU SAID WAS THAT THERE >> IS A PROFFER OF COMMITTED ELEMENT OF CROSSWALKS ON FERRINGTON AND NC 54? >> > > I WEAR ' T THINK THERE IS A DETAILS PROFFER WRITTEN ON THE GROWTH PLAN. >> BUT THAT IS SOMETHING THAT >> WE WOULD SEEK TO INCLUDE BASED ON D.O.T. AUTHORIZATION AS >> I MENTIONED BEFORE, THERE ARE DETAILS TO BE EXERCISED. AM I SPECIFYING CORRECTLY? > > FOR MY POINT OF INFORMATION, THERE IS NOT CURRENTLY A PROFFE FOR PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS ON N 54 THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE ONE MADE TONIGHT BY THE CANDIDATE AND WE WOULD HAVE TO MAKE SURE IT WAS ENFORCEABLE AND LEGAL. > > THE CANDIDATE IS SHAKING HIS HEAD. > > HE ' S NODDING HIS HEAD UP AND DOWN. > > SUBJECT TO NCDOT AUTHORIZATION. > > THEY ' RE MAYOR >>. I BELIEVE THERE IS CURRENTLY PATHWAY ON THREE OF THE EDGES, BUT NOT NECESSARILY TH ENTIRE CROSSWAY. SO HOW WOULD YOU PROPOSE TO TIE RIGHT INTO THOSE TO CONNECT THE CROSSWALK IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING WALKWAY AND OR FILL I ANY GAPS >>? > > , I ' M TRYING TO CONSIDER TH MAP >> AND FIND OUT WHICH OF THOSE SECTORS IS MISSING.> I THINK THERE MAY BE SOME WORRY FROM D.O.T. CONCERNING EXPANDING PATHWAY EASTWARD INT THE INTERCHANGE AREA. THAT, ONCE MORE, IS SOMETHING WE HAVE TO RESOLVE THE PROCESS. > > SO I ASSUME MAYBE TO REACH A POINT THIS EVENING, PERHAPS THERE COULD BE SOME DISCUSSION WITH LOCAL TRANSPORT PERSONNEL TO COME UP WITH SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO EVERYONE? REGARDING SUPPORTING FACILITIES AND SIDEWALKS, THINGS LIKE THAT? > > CERTAINLY WE WOULD WANT TO INCLUDE PEDESTRIAN HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE RAMPS IN WHICH THEY ARE REFERRED TO.BUT LIKEWISE, WE DON ' T WISH TO LEAD PEOPLE TO WHERE SIDEWALKS WILL TERMINATE AND NO BE USED IN THE FUTURE. I ASSUME THAT IS YOUR CONCERN. > > MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, IF I MIGHT, CONSULTANT WITH TRANSPORT STAFF, IF THE CANDIDATE MAKES IT CLEAR THAT THE RENOVATIONS WOULD BE CLEAR TO D.O.T. AUTHORIZATION AND SPECIFICATIONS THAT WOULD ENCOMPASS THINGS LIKE PROPER TERMINATION FACTOR, HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AND
OTHER CONNECTED PRODUCTS. > > THAT IS CERTAINLY WHAT WE ' RE PROPOSING, YES. AND PROFFERING. > > AT THE IDEAL >> TIME, CANISTER YOU READ THAT LANGUAGE RIGHT INTO THE DOCUMENT, FOR US? > > I WOULD ASK THAT THE APPLICANT SPECIFY THE PLACE OF THE AUTHORIZATIONS. I UNDERSTAND YOU CLAIMED SOMETHING EARLIER. WE WISH TO SEE TO IT WE UNDERSTAND. > > I ASSUME WE OUGHT TO SAY LIMITE GENERALLY TO THE INTERSECTION O 54 FERRINGTON ROADWAY. IF WE OBTAIN TO SPECIFIC AREAS I DON ' T INTEND TO MISLEAD WHERE THEY COULD BE BUT IT WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH D.O.T. PLAN. NOT TRYING TO STAY CLEAR OF. I PUT ON ' T INTEND TO OVERPROMISE AND UNDERDELIVER. > > CONSIDERING THAT WE HAVE THIS SCHEMATIC HERE, CAN YOU SPEAK TO WHERE THE TAKEOFF WOULD BE FOR THE FLYOVER ON FERRINGTON ROADWAY OVER? I UNDERSTAND THIS HAS >> BEEN PROPOSED. WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? > > BEAR WITH ME ONE SECONDLY WHILE A FIND THE SLIDE THAT IS PERHAPS BETTER TO CONSIDER THAT ON. THIS IS ONCE MORE, REORIENTED. NORTH IS UP IN THIS FIELD. THE STARTING POINT IN WHICH FERRINGTON ROADWAY WOULD LEAVE ITS EXISTING GRADE IS PROBABLY SOMEWHERE ABOUT 300-FOOT SOUTH OF THE JUNCTION. IT WOULD CONNECTION BACK INTO GRADE SOMEWHERE 300, 350 FEET NORTH O THE JUNCTION. > > DO YOU HAVE ANY CONCEPT HOW HIG THAT WOULD GO TO ANY POINT IN TIME? >> > > MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT TO ATTAIN TYPICAL CLEARANCE UNDER THE STRUCTURE, THAT THERE NEEDS TO BE 16.5 FEET OF CLEARANCE ON THIS SORT OF PATH. THE HIGHEST POINT WOULD BE 60-PLUS FEET? IS THAT WHAT YOU ARE CLAIMING? > > AND FROM THAT FACTOR, YOU WOULD HAVE THE ABILITY TO ATTAIN WHAT I STANDARD, A 6% TO 7%GRADE OFF OF THAT BRIDGE PULL BACK TO THE EXISTING QUALITY. > > AND THE HEIGHT OF THE CONSTRUCTING THAT YOU ' RE SUGGESTING ON YOUR WEBSITE ARE WHAT? HOW HIGH ARE THE STRUCTURES >>? > > I ' M TOLD THAT THEY ' RE SEVEN TALE. > > I HEARD– I ASSUMED I SAW 7 TALES. CAN I MULTIPLY 7 TIMES 8 TO OBTAIN THE COMPLETE ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING? WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? I ' M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND– I UNDERSTAND WE DISCUSSED THE$40 MILLION IN YEARS LATER ON BEFORE THIS OCCURS BUT I ' LOOKING TO OBTAIN A SENSE AS
>> TO HOW HIGH THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS THA YOU CARRY YOUR SITE ARE GOING TO LOOK FAMILY MEMBER TO THE OVERPASS >> AT FERRINGTON ROAD. >> > > MY NAME IS PHIL CUP. CENTRIC ENGINEERING.I APOLOGIZE. THE BELLS SUGGESTED ARE 7 TALES. IF YOU PRESUME ROUGHLY 12 FEET PER TALE. 12 TO 13 FEET PER STORY. BY THE TIME THE HIGHWAY WOULD B GOING DOWN IN BEFORE OUR BUILDING, IT ' S GON NA APPEAR LIKE A SIX AND A HALF TO 7 STORY ABOVE THE STREET'. BECAUSE THE FLYOVER AS IT BEGIN TO COME DOWN, IT WILL ACTUALLY HAVE TO DO WITH HALFWAY DOWN THE 16-FOOT ELEVATION BY THE TIME IT ENTERS FRONT OF OUR BUILDING. >> > > IF YOU COULD MENTION ON TH MAP WHERE YOU ' RE BUILDING
? > > THIS IS THE EXISTING CHURCH RIGHT BELOW. OUR BUILDING IS ACTUALLY PLACED– THE FRONT BUILDING IS PUT APPROXIMATELY IN THAT SETTING RIGHT THERE. > > OK. > > DOES THAT AID RESPONSE THE INQUIRY? > > YES, IT'GIVES A FAR BETTER VISUA IF IF I AM RESTING ON THE SIXTH FLOORING, WHAT AM I LOOKING AT? I ' M LOOKING AT A FLYOVER THAT IS UPCOMING DOWN, ALMOST AT THE ENDPOINT ON THE GROUND. >> > > PRACTICALLY, YEAH. > > OK. > > A FEW VARIOUS OTHER ADDED POINTS ARE >> NOTEWORTHY BELOW. AS A CHOOSING TO DEVELOP UNDER THE COMPACT COMMUNITY TIER CRITERIA, THE CITY ' S THOROUGH PLAN WILL CERTAINLY ALLOW LEVEL OF SOLUTION E AT >> FERRINGTON ROAD. OUR RENOVATIONS PRESERVE DEGREE SERVICE D, WHICH IS THE CITY ' S COMMON CRITERION. NEXT THE SITE WILL LIKELY INTERCEPT WEB TRAFFIC ALREADY ON TH NETWORK DESTINED FOR OTHER MEDICAL OFFICES WEST OF BELOW.
>> DECREASING THE EFFECT >> ON NC >> 54 WEST OF THE WEBSITE. LET ME BE CLEAR, THAT TYPE OF TRIP RECORD WAS NOT ASSUMED IN THE TRAFFIC RESEARCH STUDY. IT WAS DONE THAT MEANS TO BE TRADITIONALIST. > > ARE YOU TELLING ME THIS IS An ASSET? INDIVIDUALS THAT LIVE ON 54 THAT ARE GOING WEST WILL NOW SEE A GREAT DEAL OF WEBSITE TRAFFIC SINCE YOUR CLIENT WIL BE QUITING AT YOUR SITE? > > CERTAINLY MEDICAL OFFICE USES, A WHOLE LOT OF THEM TO THE WEST AND IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS COMPLICATED WOULD LIKELY INTERCEPT A GREAT DEAL OF THAT TRAFFIC BEFORE IF GOES FARTHER WEST DOWN NC 54.
SO IT REDUCES THE CAR MILES OF TRAVELING IS THE MOST EFFECTIVE TERMS I TIN THINK OF. IT SHORT CIRCUITS THEIR TRIP. >> MAKES IT SHORTER. > > IF THEY WERE GOING TO A MEDICAL FACILITY, AND I CLAIM, WELL YOU PUT ON ' T NEED TO CONCERN THE HEALTH CENTER CURRENTLY SINCE WE STEP YO BACK TO THE >> BUILDING, I TIN UNDERSTAND THAT.
> > THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. > > SORRY TO KEEP INTERRUPTING YOUR PRESENTATION. > > THIS IS THE EXISTING CHURCH RIGHT BELOW. > > DOES THAT ASSIST ANSWER THE CONCERN? > > ARE YOU INFORMING ME THIS IS A GREAT POINT?YOU ARE TELLING ME COMPETITION-WISE, YOU FEEL FAIRLY CERTAIN THAT THE MARKETPLACE THAT IS GOING TO WEST CHAPEL HILLSIDE WILL NOT EXIST BECAUSE THEY WILL BE IN SOME YOUR STRUCTURES THEREFORE NOT A WHOLE LOT O TRAFFIC GOING THIS WAY? >> > > I MAY DEMAND TO ASK THE APPLICANT TO TALK WITH THAT EVEN MORE DIRECTLY. >> > > I RAISE IT BECAUSE YOU RAISE IT. >> > > RIGHT. IT IS SOMETHING WE'' RE SEEING TAKING PLACE IS MEDICAL OFFICES, THE SUSTAINING FACILITIES ARE RELOCATING AWAY FROM THE HOSPITAL CENTERS.THEY ' RE TRYING TO END UP BEING EASIER TO WHERE THE WEBSITE TRAFFIC IS FREEING UP LOCATION IN THE HEALTHCARE FACILITIES FOR MORE BEDS. > > ARE YOU GOING TO RESPONSE THAT ALL RIGHT. >> > > THE LAST FACTOR I INTENDED TO MAKE HERE MERELY >> IS THAT THERE IS A UNIQUE, DEEDED ACCESSIBILITY TO FERRINGTON ROADWAY FROM THIS BUILDING, ACTUALLY, THE PROPERT TO THE SOUTH. THIS IT RETURNS TO THE POINT I MENTIONED A MINUTE AGO. WE ' LL BE PROVIDING CROSS ACCESS EASEMENTS TO THAT BUILDING VIA THE SUBJECT RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY APPROXIMATELY CLEORA DRIVE.AS An OUTCOME, D.O.T. WILL NOT BE BURDENED WITH HAVING TO INCUR PROBLEMS AS A RESULT OF REMOVING THE DEEDED ACCESS. I ASSUME THAT IS AN IMPORTANT POINT TO KEEP IN MIND. WHICH CONNECTS BACK TO THE IMPORTANCE OF HAVING CROSS GAIN ACCESS TO EASEMENTS, WHICH WE ARE PROPOSING. KEEPING THAT, PERMIT ME TO SUMMARIZE REA QUICK. WE ARE SUGGESTING $1 MILLION IN IMPROVEMENTS THAT ACCOMMODATE EVEN MORE THAN SIMPLY THE SITE WEBSITE TRAFFIC FOR THIS JOB. THESE IMPROVEMENTS WILL CERTAINLY GIVE ADDITIONAL CAPACITY. THEY WILL CERTAINLY MAKE MORE EFFICIENT USE OF EXISTING CAPABILITY. AND THEY WILL CERTAINLY LIKEWISE REDUCE TO HELP LINES. IT IS ESSENTIAL LIKEWISE TO UNDERSTAND THAT THERE ARE NO PROBLEMS BETWEEN THE NC 54 CORRIDOR STUDY AND THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WE ' RE MAKING. WE SIMPLY FEELING THAT UNTIL FINANCES CONTAINER BE GOTTEN TO CREATE THAT GRADE SEPARATION AND DO LONGER TOMORROW TRANSPORT RENOVATIONS, INTERIM SOLUTIONS ARE NEEDED RIGHT HERE WHICH ' S WHAT THIS TASK IS PROPOSING. PLEASED TO ADDRESS ANY OTHER QUESTIONS AT THE SUITABLE TIME. > > COUNCILMAN SCHEWEL. > > THANKS,'MR. MAYOR. I HAVE A FEW CONCERNS. ONE IS SIMPLY ON WEB PAGE 11 OF THE MEMO WORRYING THE STYLE COMMITMEN COMMITMENTS >>, I WASN ' T SURE– THE AREA ON AUTO PARKING DECKS THERE IS INCOMPLETE. AND IT SIMPLY LEAVES ME TO ASK A PERSON IN PLANNING, MAYBE WHETHER OR NOT THERE ARE VARIOUS OTHER DESIGN COMMITMENTS THAT ARE MISSING OUT ON IN THIS SUMMARY. IT YOU VIEW ON PAGE 11 OF THE TEAM MEMORANDUM. YOU WILL SEE WHERE IT SAYS PARKING DECKS, AN INCOMPLETE SENTENCE AT THE END OF THE SECTION.ARE THERE OTHER DESIGN DEDICATIONS THAT ARE NOT THEREIN OR IS THAT JUST THE END O THE SENTENCE THAT IS LEFT OFF? YOU SEE WHERE I AM SPEAKING ABOUT, RUB? FROM A GLANCE, MR. SCHEWEL,
IT LOOKS LIKE– REASON, COUNCILMAN SCHEWEL, IT APPEARS LIKE THERE ARE MISSING OUT ON WORDS THERE. THE BASE OF THE REDUCTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOES HAVE THE IN-DEPTH COMPLETE DEDICATION IN REGARDS TO STYLE COMMITMENTS, A-1 D ON THE PARKING DECK. IF VALUABLE, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO READ THOSE INTO THE RECORD. > > I WOULD LEAVE THAT TO SOMEONE ELSE THAT KNOWS EVEN MORE REGARDING WHETHER OR NOT WE REQUIREMENT TO DO THAT, BUT SIMPLY TO BE BE CLEAR, UM, YEAH, SO I ' M CURIOUS ABOUT WHAT THE VARIOUS OTHER STYLE COMMITMENTS >> ARE THAT I MAY BE MISSING IN THE RECAP? > > TRUTHFULLY, I WEAR ' T HAVE WHA THIS RECAP WAS WRITTEN OFF OF BUT I THINK WHAT ' S MISSING THERE IS JUST THE DISTANCE IN BETWEEN THOSE PILLARS. > > NO OTHER STYLE DEDICATIONS? >> THAT IS TYPE OF COMPLETION OF THE SECTION. > > I THINK THAT ' S CORRECT. I BELIEVE THE LAST COMPONENT OF THE LAYOUT DEDICATION. > > THAT ' S EXACTLY RIGHT. IT SAYS >> THEY WILL CERTAINLY EXTEND 12 INCHES DOWN AND AESTHETICALLY MATCH THE PARAPET AND LOCATED EVERY THREE BASE OPENINGS. >'> NO OTHER TO FOLLOW THAT. > > THERE IS ONE, BUT IT IS INCORPORATED IN THE SUMMARY OF THE STAFF RECORD, THAT IS THAT THE AUSTERE WILL CERTAINLY DEVELOP UNIQUE ARCHITECTURAL ATTRIBUTES. > > MANY THANKS. HOW DID THE TRAFFIC ENHANCEMENTS–> I HEARD MR. MALONE SAY THE TRAFFIC DEDICATIONS– WEB TRAFFIC RENOVATIONS ARE NOT IN PROBLEM WITH THE 54 CORRIDOR RESEARCH, WHICH CAUSED THE WALKWAY AT FERRINGTON ROADWAY. AND I WONDERED ONCE AGAIN, >> MORE THAN CURIOUS, I WAS ANXIOUS TO KNOW FROM OUR STAFF, IS THERE ANY FACTOR, IN YOUR MIND, THAT THESE RENOVATIONS SUGGESTED BY THE DESIGNER WOULD HINDER OUR CAPACITY TO MAKE THE CHANGES IN THE 54 CORRIDOR RESEARCH STUDY IF AND WHEN CASH IS AVAILABLE TO MAKE THE MODIFICATIONS? EXISTS ANY METHOD IN WHICH THIS REMAINS IN PROBLEM WITH THE RESEARCH O DOES IT COMPORT WITH THE FUTURE NEEDS OF THE RESEARCH STUDY? EXPENSE GENTRY TRANSPORTATION, WE ' RE NOT FAMILIAR WITH ANY IMPROVES WOULD PROBLEM WITH THE 54 RESEARCH STUDY OR IMPEDE IT. > > THANKS, MR. COURT. AS I CHECK OUT ADD-ON 9, THE LETTER FROM THE STATE D.O.T. IT CLAIMS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS ARE CONSTANT WITH THE PRODUCING OF WEBSITE TRAFFIC TO IMPACT THE HALLWAY. IT APPEARS THAT IS ALSO REAL IN THE OF OUR LOCAL D.O.T. IN ACCESSORY 9, PAGES 2 AND 3, DIVISION OF TRANSPORT LETTER FROM MICHELLE GRAY RUNDOWN A LISTING OF IMPROVES FOR LEVEL OF SOLUTION, WHICH IS ASSIGNED AS POOR AND NOT ALLOW THIS JUNCTION OBTAIN FURTHER BROKEN DOWN. I ASK YOURSELF WHAT IS WORSE THAN POOR? I PRESUME MAYBE SHE COULD HAVE CALLED IT HOR ENDOUS OR DISTRESSING OR TERRIBLE WOULD B THE NEXT LEVEL OF SERVICE DOWN. BUT I WONDER, MICHELLE GRAY ' S LETTER DETAILS THE SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS, I WAS QUESTIONING I THE RENOVATIONS YOU DETAILED, HAVE YOU TOOK ON ALL OF THESE SUGGESTED RENOVATIONS THAT THE D.O.T. SUGGESTED? OTHERWISE, WHICH ONES IS THE DEVELOPER NOT COMMITTED TO? > > WE HAVE ACTUALLY DEDICATED T EVERY ONE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS SUGGESTED BY NCDOT AND THE CITY OF DURHAM AND CURRENTLY THE EXTRA PROFFER FOR THE PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS. > > MANY THANKS. AND THIS IS A CONCERN FOR PLANNING PERSONNEL AGAIN. I RECOGNIZE THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF TH LEE TOWN TRANSIT STATION NEA THIS LOCATION HAS NOT BEEN ULTIMATELY CHOSEN. I UNDERSTAND IT HAS WALKED AROUND A LO LOT. A ASSUMING THE CHOICE OF THE TRANSPORTATION ROUTE, RUNS IN FRONT. HOW MUCH MIGHT THEY BE FROM THE TRANSIT STATION? COULD YOU
>> OFFER ME A SERIES OF RANGE GIVEN WHAT WE UNDERSTAND NOW ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF THE PLACE? > > 2,200, SO FIFTY PERCENT A MILE. > > 2,200. THANK YOU. > > THE OTHER PROBLEM THAT I LOOK FOR WITH THE 54 RESEARCH FOR POTENTIAL PROBLEM IS THAT THAT RESEARCH STUDY CALLS FOR THIS ITEM OF LAND TO BE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL. I ' M THINKING ABOUT HEARING FROM OUR STAFF. ANY THOUGHTS YOU HAVE ABOUT DEVIATING FROM THAT SUGGESTION. WE HAVEN ' T TOOK ON THAT REFERRAL. THAT IS NOT THE ZONING >> USE CURRENTLY. >> I WONDER IF YOU HAVE IDEAS O THAT, GIVEN THE PASSAGE RESEARCH. > > SURE, I DEALT WITH An EMPLOYEE ON THAT PARTICULAR STRATEGY WITH THE LAND USAGE SIDE OF IT. THE LAND USE MODEL SHOWN IN THE 54 PASSAGE STRATEGY IS MEANT AS A GUIDE.IT IS MEANT AS AN ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE OF HOW WE OUGHT TO DEVELO IN A NODAL FASHION AROUND THE TRANSPORTATION STATION. IT IS SIGNIFICANTLY CONSTANT WITH HOW WE HAVE DONE DETAILS IN DOWNTOWN AND IN THE NINE ROAD AREA ABOUT THE SUGGESTED TERMINALS THAT WILL CERTAINLY OCCUR THERE. IT IS NOT NECESSARILY MEANT TO TAKE THAT ILLUSTRATIVE DRAWING, AREA IT ON A PARCEL
MAP OF WHA EXISTS NOW AND NECESSARILY SAY THAT IS EXACTLY IN WHICH THE LINES OUGHT TO BE. IT WAS NEVER MEANT TO BE THIS WAY. WHAT IT WAS MEANT TO PERFORM IS PROVIDE A GUYS SO WHEN WE DO A SMALL LOCATION COMPACT NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN IN THE AREA, WE WOULD USAGE IT AS A GUIDE TO BE EVEN MORE SPECIFIC CONCERNING WHERE EXACTLY THE LINES OUGHT TO BE DRAWN. SO I WOULDN ' T CHARACTERIZE IT NECESSARILY AS A REDESIGNATION FROM A MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO WORKPLACE. RATHER THAT WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS HAVE THE A LOT OF INTENSE GROWTH. AND THE BEST MIX OF UTILIZES AROUND THE STATION AND TYPE OF CONCENTRIC RING VERSION WOULDN ' T BE EXACTLY CONCENTRIC RINGS BUT THAT WOULD LEAD AWAY FROM THE STATION. > > YOU REALLY FEEL THAT FITS IN WITH THAT CONCEPT?
> > IT COULD CERTAINLY FIT IN WITH THAT IDEA, YES. THIS WOULD BE WHAT THEY TELEPHONE CALL THE MIXED USE 2 AROUND THAT AREA. IT IS OBVIOUSLY NOT MIXED USAGE. IT IS NOT EXACTLY WHAT THEY CALL FOR IN THE 54 PASSAGE PLAN, BUT IT IS CERTAINLY CANISTER BE AS SOON AS THE REMAINDER OF THE LOCATION CREATES INCORPORATED'INTO THE T.O.D. DESIGN THAT WE WOULD PUT ON THE LOCATION. >> > > MANY THANKS. ONE EVEN MORE CONCERN. WE LEARNT THROUGH NEIGHBORS FROM THE FALCON RIDGE AREA ABOUT CONCERNS ABOUT UPCOMING OUT OF THEIR AREA, CROSSING LANES, THAT EXAMPLE. I QUESTION IF ANYBODY FROM OUR PERSONNEL WOULD INTEND TO TALK ABOUT THAT AND WHETHER OR NOT THIS PLAN HERE ALTERS THAT FORMULA IN ANY WAY? IF SO, DOES IT CHANGE IT FOR IT IS WORSE OR FOR THE BETTER? > > OBTAIN YOU TO CLARIFY VEHICULAR PEDESTRIAN, >> BOTH? > > I WAS TALKING VEHICULAR. > > NO, THIS PROPOSED OUGHT TO NOT HAVE ANY INFLUENCE, OTHER THAN OBVIOUSLY, A SLIGHT INCREASE OF TRAFFIC ON 54. MORE TRAFFIC GOOD POSSIBLY CAUSE MORE DELAYS BUT IT IS A SIGNALIZED JUNCTION, ALL OPERATING WITHIN OUR ADOPTED LEVEL OF SOLUTION WITHIN THE RESEARCH LOCATION. > > THANK YOU SIGNIFICANTLY. > > YOU ' RE WELCOME. IDENTIFY COUNCILMAN BROWN. > > MANY THANKS, MR. MAYOR. >> I WANT TO ADDRESS THIS TO THE WEBSITE TRAFFIC> INDIVIDUAL, PLEASE.
>> THE ERROR THAT THIS TASK WOULD GENERATE 2.7%BOOST IN WEB TRAFFIC ALONG FREEWAY 54. > > THAT ' S CORRECT. > > DOES THAT INCLUDE FERRINGTON ROADWAY OR DID YOU ASSESS THAT? > > THAT IS ONLY ON NC 54. I DIDN ' T COMPUTE WHAT THE CERTAIN INCREASE> WOULD GET ON FERRINGTON >> ROADWAY ITSELF. THE OVERALL IS A 4 %INCREASE. JUST RELUCTANT OF 4% INCREASE. > > MY COLLEAGUES AND I THINK DI RECEIVE A MEMO FROM A COUNCIL MEMBER IN CHURCH HILLSIDE THAT LIVES IN THIS COMMUNITY OR AROUND AND I ' LL> SIMPLY'ESTIMATE YOU WHAT HE
>> SAYS. IT IS PART THAT THE ZONING ACTIVITY WOULD ALLOW THE CANDIDATE TO >> GENERATE ABOUT 40 TIMES– 40 TIMES AS MUCH WEBSITE TRAFFIC AS THE PRESENT ZONING ALLOWS. IS THAT WHAT YOU DISCOVER IN YOUR ANALYSIS AS WELL? I ' M KIND OF CONFUSED BELOW >>. > > I WILL BE HONEST. PERHAPS THAT COMPARISON IS A LITTLE MISLEADING, COMPARED TO CHURCH ON A WEEKDAY. A CHURCH PRODUCES EXTREMELY LITTLE WEB TRAFFIC. SO PERHAPS MAYBE 40 TIMES. THE CHURCH GENERATES REALLY LITTLE WEB TRAFFIC ON A WEEKDAY SO PERHAPS OUR SITE DOES CREATE 40 TIMES WHAT IT DOES TODAY. IS THAT YOUR QUESTION OR AM I MISINTERPRETING? > > MAYBE I DIDN ' T UNDERSTAND YOUR FEEDBACK >>. I ' M STILL OVERWHELMED. > > I ' M INTERESTED IN HOW YOU CAN COME UP WITH THE 2.7%, IF YOU CAN QUICKLY SUMMARIZE THAT. > > SURE. BASICALLY, WHAT IT DOES IS USE THE ITE TRIP GENERATION MANUAL TO FIGURE OUT THE NUMBER OF TRIPS IN THE OFFICE IN THE A.M. AND P.M. HEIGHT HOURS AND SIMPLY USES THAT AS A PORTION OF THE EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT THE CROSSWAY. > > WHAT WAS THE OVERALL NUMBER OF TRIPS? > > COMPLETE NUMBER OF >> JOURNEYS PRODUCED IN THE TOP HOUR. A.M. AND P.M. SIMPLY TIMID OF 300 TRIPS. > > THAT STANDS FOR 4% OF THE >> WEB TRAFFIC? > > AT THE JUNCTION OVERALL, YES. > > WELL, THAT ASSISTS. THAT ASSISTS US. > > OK. > > THE 2ND PROBLEM WORRIES TH$40 MILLION AND APPARENTLY THAT WILL TRULY BE NEEDED TO RESOLV THE RATHER COMPLEX TRAFFIC PROBLEMS AT THIS POINT. >> AND WHAT YOU ' RE TELLING United States IS THAT THE >> STATE HAS ON THEIR PLANS THAT THEY WILL WITH ANY LUCK BUILD THE ENHANCEMENTS IN IF THE YEAR 2022? > >> > TOOK A RECENT TAKE A LOOK AT THE T.I.P., ACTUALLY TODAY. AND WHAT THEY ' RE PROVING IS >> ENHANCEMENTS– THERE IS SOME FUNDING >> $1.6 >> MILLION IS ALLOCATED IN 2014. AND THE DRAFT T.I.P. FOR A MINO CHANGE, A CONNECTION BETWEEN FERRINGTON ROAD AND I-40. THAT REALLY DOESN ' T ADDRESS THE WONDERFUL SPLITTING UP'OF FERRINGTON ROAD.THOSE MORE LONGER-REACHING, BIGGER TICKET PRODUCTS THAT WILL REALLY DO SOME ADVANTAGE TO THE JUNCTION, THEY BEGIN– NCDOT WOULD BEGIN ALLOCATING FUNDS IN YEAR 2020. I WILL TAKE A LOOK AT COSTS TO CLARIFY. I BELIEVE'THAT IS CORRECT. BUT IN OVERALL, THEY WOULD NOT HAVE TOTAL AMOUNT FINANCING TO DO THE ENHANCEMENTS TILL SOMETIME PAST THE T.I.P. PERSPECTIVE WHICH IS 2023. > > SO WHAT YOU ' RE SUGGESTING TO US IS THAT THIS WOULD BE An EXCELLENT INTERIM– I PUT ON ' T KNOW IF IT
WE CONTAINER USE THE WORD “REMEDY” TO THIS CROSSWAY BECAUSE IT ' S DONE DEAL IN RECOMMENDATION TO THIS? > > IT WOULD BE A GOOD MEANTIMES ACTION IN BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEE TODAY AND WHEN THOSE FARTHER GETTING TO RENOVATIONS CANISTER BE IMPLEMENTED. > > THANKS. > > ANY OTHER COUNCIL QUESTIONS, REMARKS? ALL RIGHT. > > EXCELLENT NIGHT LADIES AND GENTS, MAYOR BELL AND COUNCIL >> MEMBERS. I ' M THE PASTOR OF FERRINGTON ROADWAY CHURCH AND CHAPMAN OF THE AIR REQUIRE RESERVE.'AS A REPRESENTATIVE “OF THE CHURCH BODY, I ' M BELOW TO ASK YO TO ASSISTANCE THE REZONING, BECAUS IT IS VITAL FOR OUR AREA O FAITH.HAS CHURCH HAS ACTUALLY DEALT WITH SEVERAL OBSTACLES ONE IS A FUNDAMENTAL ISSUE IN THE STRUCTURE THAT WE CANISTER NOT AFFORD TO SOLUTION. AND THIS CHANCE >> TO RELOCATE AHEAD WITH THE GROWTH WILL PROVIDE US, NOT ONLY THE> CAPABILITY TO MOVE FAR FROM A CONGESTED CROSSWAY, BUT ALSO A NEW CHURCH CENTER FROM THE ACQUISITIONS OF OUR RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, WHICH WOULD LIE THREE MILES DOWN FERRINGTON ROAD, AND THIS WOULD LIKEWISE RESULT IN FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR OUR CHURCH. WHILE I THINK THAT THE REZONING IS CLEARLY BENEFICIAL TO OUR CHURCH, I BELIEVE IT IS ALSO BENEFICIAL TO THE AREA AND RIGHT CURRENTLY, WHERE WE ' RE AT I WE HAVE ARCHITECTURAL PREPARES, SITE PREPARES ALREADY INCLUDING CHURCH AUTHORIZATION FOR A BRAND-NEW CHURCH FACILITY THAT WOULD REALLY CHANGE THE TRAJECTORY OF OUR CHURCH FAMILY.SO WE JUST ASK THAT YOU WOULD CONSIDER THE FUTURE SERVICE OF OUR CHURCH IN THIS REZONING. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME? > > THANKS. THAT CONCLUDES THE INDIVIDUALS TALKING ON BEHALF OF THE PRODUCT. CURRENTLY TRANSFORM TO THE CHALLENGERS. VAN NOSH. AND JULIA … McMILLEN. > > OK. > > THANKS MAYOR. I DID INTEND TO SPEAK IN RESISTANCE. I RECOGNIZE THAT THE ZONING COMPENSATION VOTED AGAINST IT. THERE WERE 2 PEOPLE IN RESISTANCE IN IT. THE LIST OFFER IS PROBABLY AT SOURCE OF A GREAT DEAL OF EMAIL. MUCH OF IT HAD TO DO WITH THE CONCER REGARDING THE TRAFFIC, AS WE UNDERSTAND IT, THAT INTERCHANGE AND INTERSECTION ARE SOME OF TH BUSIEST IN NORTH CAROLINA. INCLUDING 2%TO THE BUSIEST >>, WHEN YOU INCREASE TIMES THE LARGEST CROSSWAY IN NORTH CAROLINA, IT IS HUGE, ESPECIALLY IF IT IS 4%. WE DIDN ' T KNOW MUCH ABOUT THAT. >> ROSEMARY>, WHO I THOUGHT WOULD SPEAK BEFORE ME, KEPT IN MIND THAT SHE STAYS ABREAST OF THE COUNTY INFORMATION.AND LET THE AREA KNOW CONCERNING IT. THE ZONING, I PASS THE ROADWAY AL THE MOMENT. THE ZONING INDICATOR WAS ALONGSIDE WEB TRAFFIC. I DIDN ' T NOTIFICATION IT UNTIL AFTER HER EMAIL. I ASSUME YOU WOULD OBTAIN EVEN MORE INFORMATION IF MORE FOLKS RECOGNIZED IT. WE DID GET A BUZZ. A WHOLE LOT OF FOLKS FIRST READIARE F DEVELOPMENT. I AM FOR GROWTH, SMART ADVANCEMENT. THERE IS A NUMBER DONE IN DURHA COUNTY IN THE LOCATION THAT ARE IN THE CITY THAT ARE CLEVER. I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS SOME BUSINESS STRAIGHT ACROSS INTERSTATE 40. CHURCH HILL IS WHERE EVERYBODY DESIRES TO
LIVE AND WORK IN HAVE. T. EVERY EARLY MORNING, IT IS A JAM. WHEN I SPEAK TO FOLKS IN MY OFFICE ABOUT THIS THAT DIDN ' T UNDERSTAND ABOUT THIS WHATSOEVER, THEY CLAIMED THEY WILL CERTAINLY ADD MORE TRAFFIC TO THE JUNCTION, WHICH I THINK IS PROBABLY THE SURPRISED FEEDBACK YOU RECEIVE FROM ANYBODY THAT TAKES A TRIP THAT ROAD. I RECOGNIZE THE CAROLINA HEALTHWAY, IT MAKES An EXCELLENT WEB PAGE.I UNDERSTAND THEIR WISH TO DEVELOP EVEN MORE FACILITIES AND THE CENTERS GOT UP AND DOWN THE FREEWAY FROM THE HEALTHCARE FACILITY RIGHT TO SOUTH POINT, BUT THE EXCELLENT PART ABOUT THAT IS IF CAROLINA CROSSING BECOMES PART OF THE CROSSWAY, YOU TIN RELOCATE ACROSS AND IT IS STILL IN THE COUNT. WHEN I WAS CHECKING OUT THAT', DRIVING AROUND, I SAW THE ZONIN SERVICE THE PALTIN APARTMENT OR CONDOS I WHAT YOU AUTHORIZED AT SOME POINT FORMERLY. IN THAT DOCUMENT, YOU REQUIRED THEM TO CONSIDER THE WEBSITE TRAFFIC OF CAROLINA CROSSING WHEN THEY WORKED WITH THOSE LEVEL SOLUTION C CROSSWAYS. AND I ASSUME YOU HAS TO A MINIMUM OF ASK THIS TEAM TO CONSIDE THE GREATER WEBSITE TRAFFIC FROM THOS RESEARCH STUDIES IN WHAT ' S OCCURRING IN THIS CROSSWAY. I ASSUME THAT THEY ARE FUNCTIONING A DIFFICULT AS THEY CANISTER TO REMAIN BELOW YOUR 110% IN YOUR PAPER. I BELIEVE SEVERAL OF THE NUMBERS AREN ' T RIGHT. , if YOU INCLUDE THE PEDESTRIANS YOU HAVE TO DELAY FOR THEM TO COME ACROSS.YOU DON ' T HAVE PEDESTRIANS THER NOW.. YOU TAKE YOUR LIFE IN YOUR HAND TO GO FROM ONE BUS STOP TO THE VARIOUS OTHER SIDE. NOW, THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO DO THAT. IT WILL ALTER THE DEGREE OF SOLUTION if YOU ADD THAT. IT WON ' T BE IN THE POSITIVE INSTRUCTIONS. I ' M FOR THE CROSSWALK. I ' M FOR SOME REASONABLE REMEDY. ADDING AS I RECALL', IT WAS 125 AVERAGE A DAY INTO 5,000 WHICH IS WHERE YOU GOT THE 40 NUMBER EARLIER. IT IS 5,000 AUTOMOBILES THAT WEAR ' T MAKE THE TURN TODAY IN THE JUNCTION'. THE VARIOUS OTHER THING THAT CONCERNS ME, IF YOU COME FROM 40 FROM THE 501 LOCATION, GOING EAST AND YOU GET OFF ON 54 THERE, THERE IS A WHOLE LOT OF INDIVIDUALS THAT CARRY THIS OUT. TURN– EVERYBODY THAT LIVES IN GOVERNOR ' S CLUB, EVERYONE IN THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE COUNTY MAKE THIS TURN, WHERE YOU DIVE, YOU WEAVE AS THEY REFER TO IT AS, IN WEB TRAFFIC, OVER FOUR LANES. WE WILL CERTAINLY MAKE THAT TO THE 5TH LANE NOW,'TO MAKE A LEFT-HAND TURN ON FERRINGTON ROADWAY. YOU WILL NOTE THE INSANE PEOPLE CUTTING YOU OFF LEFT AND RIGHT if YOU DRIVE WITH THERE. NOW WE WILL CERTAINLY HAVE PEOPLE, 5,000 DAY WEAVING THE VARIOUS OTHER WAY TO ENTER INTO THIS FACILITY. THE OTHER THING THAT STRUCK ME ABOUT IT IS DENSE ADVANCEMENT. THEY ' RE USING 70% OF THE LAND FOR THE FACILITY. AND IN IT THE APPROVAL IT ASKS YOU TO ACCEPT THAT THEY CANISTER BE WITHIN 25'FEET OF THE FRONT, 25 ' 1″ SIDE, 15 FEET. THEY ' RE JAMMING THIS UP AND WISH TO GO 120 FEET IN THE AIR. IF THEY DON ' T WANT TO GO 120 FEET AIRBORNE THEY CANISTER MODIFICATION THAT AND DECLINE IT DOWN.
A FOUR-STORY BUILDING, SOMETHIN MODEST, SOMETHING WITH GAIN ACCESS TO FROM THE OTHER CAROLINA CROSSING. I UNDERSTAND WHY THEY INTEND TO D IT FROM An ORGANIZATION POINT OFVIEW. IF YOU PLACE THE DEVELOPMENT IN AN AREA WHERE LIKE EQUIPMEDEVEL IS UNDERWAY, I ASSUME DURHAM IS OFFERED BETTER. THE HEALTH CENTER THERE IS SOME ACROSS OVER THERE. NOT THAT YOU HAVE TO REASON, IT SURE DOES LOOK SMART TO MAKE THAT TYPE OF POINT HAPPEN. I BELIEVE THAT ' S ALL I HAD. ROSEMARY IS KINDHEARTED AND WANTS CONSIDERATIONS PUT IN. THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS CONCERNED CONCERNING THE DEGREE OF SERVICE THER NOW. EACH TIME THE LEVEL OF SOLUTION DECREASES, YOU WILL LEAVE MOR AND MORE CARS THAT ARE GUSHING EXHAUST RIGHT INTO THE AREA, WAITING TO ENTER AND OUT OF THERE, PLUS THE WASTE OF POWER A WONDERFUL OPTION WOULD BE A FEW OTHER ENTRANCE TO CHURCH HILL, NOW, INDIVIDUALS THAT DON ' T TAKE THIS ENTRANCE, IT IS BECAUSE IT IS SO BAD. THEY ' RE GOING TO GO UP TO 5501. THE EVEN MORE WE TRY TO MAKE IT BETTER, THE EVEN MORE WE WILL CAUSE TRAFFIC. WE WILL CERTAINLY WIND UP WITH EVEN MORE TRAFFI BELCHING THEIR EXHAUST WHILE WAITING TO SURVIVE WHAT IS PROBABLY THE BUSIEST INTERCHANGE IN NORTH CAROLINA. I DID HAVE ONE POINT IN RESPONS TO THE WALKWAY AT FERRINGTON AND 54. WHEN THAT GOES IN THE RIGHT LAN THEY ' RE PREPARATION TO CONSTRUCT T OBTAIN INTO THE FACILITY WILL CERTAINLY NO MUCH LONGER BE PERFORMANCE. THEY ' LL TAKE INDIVIDUALS DOWN T WHAT IS PROPOSED AS AN OVERPASS AT THE'BRIDGE ROADWAY AND INCREASING BACK OR TAKING THIS WAY VIA IT. IF THE METHOD TO GET INVOLVED IN THAT CENTER IS ULTIMATELY GOING THROUGH THE VARIOUS OTHER CENTER, THE PERHAPS OBTAINING SOMETHING EVEN MORE SMALL AND PERMITTING THAT TO BE WHAT YOU– FOR ACCESS.BUT ALL TYPE OF FACTORS TO CONSIDER TO MAYBE LIMIT THE IMPACT ON WHAT IS PROBABLY AMONG THE BUSIEST INTERSECTIONS IN DURHAM > > MR. MAYOR, I ASSUME WE FELL SHORT TO GET THE NAME AND ADDRESS FRO THE SPEAKER? > > VAN'MORROW, ON FALCON BRIDGE ROAD, RIGHT THERE, PROBABLY 3/4 OF A MILE FROM THE CROSSWAY. > > ALSO, VAN, I DESIRED TO PROVIDE YO AN POSSIBILITY TO REPOSSESS THE STATEMENT YOU MADE. WHEN YOU STATED THAT EVERYONE IN IN THE LOCATION DESIRED TO RESIDE IN CHAPEL HILL. > > I’M SORRY, SIR? > > YOU MADE THE STATEMENT– I ' PARAPHRASING CURRENTLY, YOU CLAIMED EVERY PERSON IN THE AREA WISHED TO STAY IN CHAPEL HILLSIDE.
> > I ABSOLUTELY DIDN ' T SAY THAT. I SAY THAT EVERYONE IN SOME CHAPEL HILL WORKS IN RTP AND WANTS TO IT MAKE >> THE TRANSITION IT IS NOT ABOUT A CHOICE. ACTUALLY, I STAY IN DURHAM >> AND I ' M PLEASED TO BE LIVING IN APPROXIMATE– LIVING IN DURHAM ACTUALLY THE TAXES THEY PAY IN >> CHURCH HILL ARE A BIG FACTOR. > > AND WE LIKE TO THINK TOP QUALITY OF LIFE. > > I APPRECIATE THAT AS WELL. > > THANKS. > > ALL RIGHT, LET ' S MOST LIKELY TO MS. >> ROSEMARY KITCHENER. > >> EXCELLENT EVENING PARTICIPANTS, I' STARTED EVERY ONE OF THIS. I AM ROSEMARY COOKING AREA. I LIVE IN THE FALCON BRIDGE AREA, DURHAM CITY, DURHAM COUNTY AND I ' M DURHAM CENTRIC. I BELIEVE FINANCIAL ADVANCEMENT BENEFITS OUR CITY. I BELIEVE IT IS GOOD, BUT I AM NOT NIMBY IN THIS CASE. AN APPLAUD THE INSIGHT OF THE INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE SERVICING DOIN THIS. BECAUSE THERE ARE EXISTING CLINICAL CENTERS NEARBY IN ADJOINING FEATURES, I THINK THIS PROPERTY NEED TO BE >> DEVELOPED FOR THAT FUNCTION, RATHER THAN FOR RESIDENTIAL >>. I HAVE 2'PROBLEMS, NEVERTHELESS. >> THE FIRST IS AESTHETIC. THINK ABOUT THE PICKLE STRUCTURE IN DURHAM. CONSIDER THE ACCOUNT OF OUR AREA, SURROUNDING BUILDINGS, NEW AND EXISTING COMMERCIAL ARE ONE, 2, 3 STORY. NOW 27-STORY MINI PICKLE BUILDINGS. I WEAR ' T THINK THAT WILL BE AESTHETICALLY PLEASING. I ASK THE PROGRAMMERS REASSESS REGARDING THAT WHILE ESTABLISHING SUFFICIENT CAR PARKING. THE VARIOUS OTHER WEB TRAFFIC AND CONCERN IS THE WEB TRAFFIC. I ' M FEELING MUCH BETTER ABOUT THAT THAN I DID WHEN I STROLLED IN. I AM WORRIED ABOUT THE TEMPERATURE TA PEDESTRIANS, THE BUS PEDESTRIANS AND PEOPLE THAT MAY BE USING THE BIKE PATH.THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION OF MY THOUGHTS, AND ONCE MORE, I EXCUSE ALL THE E-MAILS FROM MY AREA. GOODNIGHT. > > THANKS. JULIA McMILLEN? > > HI, I THINK I ' M CONSIDERED OPPOSED BUT I BELIEVE I ' M EVEN MORE CONCERNED THAN ANYTHING. BUT FIRST, AS A PERSON THAT HASN ' T HAS A CIVICS LESSON IN 4 YEARS, I VALUE THE POSSIBILITY TO LISTEN TO HOW THOUGHTFULLY YOU THINK ABOUT ALL THE ITEMS ON THE PROGRAM TONIGHT.
> > TRUTHFULLY, I PUT ON ' T HAVE WHA THIS SUMMARY WAS WRITTEN OFF OF BUT I BELIEVE WHAT ' S MISSING OUT ON THERE IS JUST THE RANGE BETWEEN THOSE COLUMNS. > > I WAS CHATTING VEHICULAR. > > NO, THIS PROPOSED MUST NOT HAVE ANY INFLUENCE, OTHER THAN OBVIOUSLY, A MINOR BOOST OF WEB TRAFFIC ON 54. > > THANK YOU VERY MUCH. > > WELL, THAT ASSISTS.I'' M SORRY IT HAS TAKEN ME AS LONG TO GET TO A DURHAM CITY COUNCIL MEMBER. IT MAKES ME FEEL BETTER AS A DURHAM RESIDENT FOR 30-SOME YEARS TO KNOW YOU TAKE THESE POINTS SERIOUSLY. DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE CERTAINLY DO. I BELIEVE SEVERAL PEOPLE INCREASED THE CONCERN. I'' M A DELIGHTED CUSTOMER OF UNC HEALTHCARE. I FUNCTION OVER IN THE VARIOUS OTHER NEARBY COMMUNITY. A LITTLE OF MY ISSUE– POSSIBLY BECAUSE I MATURED IN FAYETTEVILLE THAT NEVER GOT THI RIGHT. 54 IS THE GATEWAY INTO DURHAM. IT IS A FIRST PERCEPTION, WHETHER FROM THE INTERSTATE OR FREEWAY 54, FERRINGTON, I BELIEVE OF THE PORTAL AS A PLEASURABLE EXPERIENCE. CURRENTLY, IT IS NOT. AND WHERE WE ARE A LITTLE WITH 2.7 AS AN BOOST ON PREVIOUS SMALL PERCENTAGES IS AN BUILDUP OF A MESS AT THAT INTERSECTION.I THINK YOU HAVE A
LABORIOUS OF VOTING ON MATTERS AS THEY COME U WHEN THEY ' RE IN SMALL INCREMENTS, BUT THE SAFETY AND SECURITY CONCERNS, FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, AND THE TRAFFIC CRANKINESS, THE STRESS IS A CONSIDERATION. I ASSUME SEVERAL PEOPLE RAISED INCONGRUITIES IN THIS. I PUT ON'' T KNOW QUITE THE PROVINCE OF THE INTENDING PAYMENT. BUT IT WAS DISTRESSING TO ME THEY ELECTED VERSUS THIS, AND IT COMES UP TO THE COMMON COUNCIL. POSSIBLY THAT IS A SUBTLETY I WEAR'' T UNDERSTAND. BUT I COUNT ON COMMISSIONS TO PUT TIME AND RESEARCH STUDY ON THAT PARTICULAR. THIS POINT MAY PROCEED. I BELIEVE WE'' RE HAVING A POSSIBILITY NOW TO THINK AS A CITY ABOUT A PROBLEM THAT MAJOR FUNDED IMPROVEMENT IS SOMETHING LIKE 2022.
THIS IS A LARGER TROUBLE THAT WE'' RE VOTING ON IN SMALL INCREMENTS. I SUPPOSE THIS WILL CERTAINLY GO ONWARD, BUT IT DOES WORRY ME THAT THIS IS A TROUBLE THAT WILL REMAIN TO DEVELOP. WE HAVE FOLKS PUNCTURE OUR COMMUNITY ALREADY WHO NATURALLY, WANT TO STAY CLEAR OF THE JUNCTION. AND THAT WILL CERTAINLY EXPAND. I MEAN, THAT'' S UNAVOIDABLE. THEY HAVE SENSE SUFFICIENT TO FIND THE SHORTCUT. I WOULD LIKE TO URGE YOU TO THINK ABOUT THE LASTING EFFECTS OF THIS. AND PERHAPS WITH THE ADJUSTMENTS YOU ASKED FOR, THIS WILL CERTAINLY EXERCISE FINE. AND I'' M SURE I WILL LOCATE MYSELF AS A CLIENT IN ONE OF THOSE OFFICES, AS MUCH OF United States WILL, BU I THINK YOUR THOUGHTFULNESS IS NECESSARY ON THIS VOTE. >> THANK YOU. > > YOUR WELCOME. ANY PERSON ELSE THAT WISHED TO PROMOTE OR AGAINST THIS AS I BRING IT BACK TO THE COUNCIL FOR COMMENTS. THE COUNCIL MAY HAVE QUESTIONS OF THE DEVELOPERS OR INDIVIDUALS THAT OFFERED STATEMENTS. I WOULD PROCLAIM THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. THE ISSUE IS PRIOR TO THE COUNCIL. I WANT TO ASK ONE QUESTION. I GOT LOST IN THE CONVERSATION. IT RELATES TO THE COUNCILMAN ED HARRISON'' S QUESTION REGARDING REQUESTING FOR THE PROFFER OF THE DEFENSE SIGNAL.WHAT DID WE HEAR ON
THAT? DID WE OBTAIN A REACTION TO THAT WHATSOEVER? > > MR. MAYOR, WHAT I CAN >> DO IS READ INTO THE RECORD THE NOTES DREW FROM THE PREVIOUS DISCUSSION AND SEE IF THE APPLICANT CONTAINER CONFIRM THE INTENT. I COMPOSED THE CANDIDATE WOULD COMMIT TO PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS ON THE WEST SIDE OF FERRINGTON TERMINATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NC 54 BASED ON CONFORMITY WITH ALL NCDOT AND CITY OF DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL B NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT. > > DOES THAT MEAN WE WILL PLACE A PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL SYSTEM THERE IF WE CAN? WHAT DOES IT MEAN? > > IT DOES, I WILL CERTAINLY HAVE THE TRANSPORT STAFF COME IN. DOT HAS REQUIREMENTS, AND THE CITY HAS DEMANDS TO MINUTIZE THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE. WE ASK THAT BOTH OF THOSE BE COMMITTED TO. IT IS COL VARY– IT EXPRESSES THE AIM OF WHAT THE COUNCIL AND AUDIO SPEAKERS HAVE STATED AND WHAT YOU STATED EARLIER, IF IS NOT, I ASK YOU TO CLARIFY. > > I THINK AS LONG AS WHAT WE ' R SPEAKING ABOUT IS UNDER THE PURVIEW OF CROSSWALKS
>> AND PEDESTRIAN TURNED ON SIGNALS THAT WE ' RE FINE. IF WE ' RE TALKING ABOUT FAR-REACHING DOWN THE CORRIDOR OR EXPANSION OF SIDEWALKS, BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS LOCATION, THAT ' S THE ONLY EXPLANATION I WOULD WANT FOR THE SECURITY OF MY CLIENT. I BELIEVE WE ' RE ON THE VERY SAME PAGE. > > HE IS NOT. > > FOR THE DOCUMENT– > > ONCE MORE, WE'NEED TO ENSURE THE COUNCIL> AND THE PEOPLE ' PROBLEMS ARE ADDRESSED. IT IS LIMITED TO CROSSWALKS AND PEDESTRIAN TURNED ON SIGNALS. THAT IS CLEAR. WE CONTAINER ENFORCE THAT. THE INTENT OF IDENTIFYING CITY AND STATE CRITERIA TO MAKE SURE THE STRIPING, MARKINGS, RAMPS WERE TO CITY AND STATE SPECIFICATIONS. > > WE ' RE CERTAINLY FINE KEEPING THAT. > > I THINK– ROSEMARY APOLOGIZED FOR> ALL THE EMAILS BUT THEY WERE HELPFUL, TO >> ME, I TRYING TO FRAME CONCERNS AND UNDERSTAND WHAT THE CONCERNS ARE FROM THE COMMUNITY ' S STANDPOINT.I WANT TO OBTAIN A MUCH BETTER FEELING REGARDING HOW DO WE STAY CLEAR OF ALL THIS CUT-THROUGH WEBSITE TRAFFIC? TELL ME WHY YOU THINK IT WON ' T HAPPEN AND WHY YOU BELIEVE THE SYSTEM YOU ARE PROPOSING WILL LESSEN THE WEBSITE TRAFFIC THEY ' RE TALKING ABOUT, WITH PEOPLE CUTTING VIA THE NEIGHBORHOO LIKE PEOPLE CLAIMED, INDIVIDUALS FOUND A SHORTER CUT? IS THERE ANYTHING TO THAT? > > I GUESS I WOULD ADD TWO POINTS. PRIMARY, I ' M NOT CERTAIN EXACTL WHAT COURSE OF CUT. THROUGH WEBSITE TRAFFIC SHE WAS> TALKING ABOUT. I WOULD ADD BY MAKING THE IMPROVEMENTS WE ' RE PROPOSING WE LESSEN THE PROBABILITY THAT INDIVIDUALS ARE GOING TO WANT TO SEARCH FOR AN ALTERNATE COURSE DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE'ARE INCLUDING ADDED CAPABILITY AND REALIZING EXISTING CAPABILITY EVEN MORE SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE RENOVATIONS WE ' RE MAKING. > > ROSEMARY, DO YOU INTEND TO SPEAK WITH THAT, PLEASE? > > AGAIN, ROSEMARY KITCHEN. REDUCING NORTH, ACQUIRING AS MUCH AS TO PREVENT THAT. THEY WILL CERTAINLY SHOW UP SEARCHING RIDGE ROADWAY TO> STAY CLEAR OF BEING ABLE TO TUR LEFT ON 54. > > WE WILL PLACE IN THIS BUMPS AS SOON AS WE CAN. THAT IS WHAT VAN IS TALKING ABOUT, THERE ARE YOUNG KIDS THAT ARE IN THE AREA. > > COULD YOU REPLY TO THAT? > > AGAIN, I THINK THAT GIVING– PEOPLE USAGE CUT-THROUGH WEBSITE TRAFFIC BECAUSE THEY PERCEIVE A FASTER COURSE. I BELIEVE MAKING THE ENHANCEMENTS WILL PREVENT THAT– > > COULD YOU >> PLACE THAT CROSSWAY UP ON THE >> DISPLAY ONCE MORE? > > I WEAR ' T HAVE ONE THAT GOES DOWN TO FALCON BRIDGE, WHICH IS FARTHER TO THE WEST. I WILL CERTAINLY INCLUDE NOT TO MAKE LIGHT OF THE CUT-THREW TRAFFIC >>, BUT IN THE FUTURE WITH THE QUALITY SPLITTING UP OF FERRINGTON ROAD, THERE NATURALLY IS GOING TO BE EVEN MORE WEB TRAFFIC AT FALCON BRIDGE. THAT ' S WHAT THE CORRIDOR– THE INFORM C 54 CORRIDOR PLAN CALLS FOR.WHILE I THINK WE CAN MAKE SOME ENHANCEMENTS THAT WILL HELP ALLEVIATE THAT FOR THE SHORT TERM, I THINK THE LASTING SERIES OF IMPROVEMENTS IS ONLY GOING TO CREATE MORE WEBSITE TRAFFIC IN THAT LOCATION BY LAYOUT DUE TO THE FACT THAT THAT IS WHERE THE INTERCHANGE WILL CERTAINLY BE. > > IF WE MOST LIKELY TO THE VISUAL APPEAL PIECE, TELL ME WHY WE DEMAND A SEVEN-STORY STRUCTURE? I KNOW YOU WILL TELL ME THIS IS An ORGANIZATION CASE. TELL ME ANYWAY. > > THE SEVEN-STORY BUILDINGS ACTUALLY WORK WITH THE PARKING DECK IN ORDER TO KIND OF MAXIMIZE HOW THE STRUCTURE IS PERFORMANCE WHILE LESSENING TH HEIGHT OF THE OVERALL VEHICLE PARKING DECK. THAT ' S A GREAT DEAL OF IT.BASICALLY, WHAT WE ARE ATTEMPTING T DO IS EQUILIBRIUM THE SITE OUT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PARKING >> DECK ACTUALLY FEATURES APPROPRIATELY FOR THE 2 BUILDINGS THAT WE ' RE PROPOSING. IN ADDITION, THE BUILDINGS ARE LOCATED SINCE WE ' RE UTILIZING TH COMPACT AREA TIER REQUIREMENTS, THE STRUCTURES
ARE IN FACT PLACED VERSUS THE STREET, DUE TO THE FACT THAT THAT IS A DEMAND OF THE COMPACT NEIGHBORHOOD RATE. THAT PERMITS FOR THE PARKING AS OPPOSED TO TO BE OUT TOWARDS TH HIGHWAY, TO BE INTERIOR'TO THE WEBSITE. THE ENTIRE POINT IS TO OBTAIN THE BUILDING OUT TO WHERE THEY CAN BE SEEN, VISIBLE AND HAVE THE CAR PARK HIDDEN WITHIN THE WEBSITE ITSELF. THE OTHER POINT TO INCLUDE IN THAT. DUE TO THE FACT THAT OF THE SIMPLICITY AM, THE SIT THAT IS DIRECTLY BEHIND US TO HAVE CROSS ACCESSIBILITY TO USE COMPONENT OF THE PARKING DECK. IT ACTUALLY ASSISTS TO SPREAD THE PARKING CENTERS AROUND A LITTLE BETTER. > > RECOGNIZE COUNCILWOMAN CATOTTI. > > I HAVE SEVERAL QUESTIONS. THANKS, MAYOR. I WILL CERTAINLY DIRECT THIS TO TRANSPORT PERSONNEL. IN SHA– ORIGINALLY, I THOUGHT I WAS CONCERNING CELESTE CIRCLE. THE WEB TRAFFIC YOU ' RE TALKING ABOU IS HEADING NORTH FROM CHATHAM COUNTY OR REALLY SOUTHERLY DURHAM REGION>, SWITCHING LEFT TO GO WEST INTO CHAPEL HILL. THIS TASK GETS ON THE NORTHSID OF 54. I PUT ON ' T KNOW HOW THIS ONE IS REALLY GOING TO– THIS TASK WOULD IMPACT'CUT-THROUGH TRAFFI IN FALCON BRIDGE. I WANT TO– IN TERMS OF GEOGRAPHY, I UNDERSTAND THERE IS An OBSTACLE. THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT THE INTERSECTION IS CHALLENGING AND REALLY THICK, BUT MARK COULD YOU OR'SOMEBODY COMMENT ON THE SUGGESTED COLLECTOR STREET PLAN AND CELESTE CIRCLE AND MAYBE YOU CAN SPEAK ABOUT CUT-THROUGH WEB TRAFFIC ON THE NORTHSIDE OF– IN YOUR CORNER OF 54? > > AS MUCH AS THE COLLECTOR ROAD STRATEGY, THERE ARE SIDES THAT CONNECT OVER TO A COLLECTO STREET SYSTEM OVER I BELIEVE AT FALCON BRIDGE ROAD.THAT WOULD OFFER A NORTH-SOUT CONNECTION AND EAST-WEST OVER TO IT. AS COMPONENT OF THE PASSAGE STUD THERE WERE SUGGESTIONS TO SUPPLY THAT CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN FERRING LOAD AND AND FALCON BRIDGE >>. > > THAT BEING 10 YEARS OUT, CONTAINER YOU DISCUSS CONNECTIVITY ON THE NORTHSIDE OF 54? > > I ' M CHRIS ALLEN, THE DEVELOPER
. I WISHED TO REFERENCE BRIEFLY, WE HAVE HAD A TERRIFIC CONNECTION, WE HAVE DEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY ON THREE QUADRANTS OF THIS CINEPLEX. WE HAVE HAD A LONGSTANDING RELATIONSHIP WITH THE FALCON BRIDGE HOA. I THINK LON JOHNSON WAS THE PREVIOUS HEAD OF STATE. WE HAVE DEALT WITH THEM QUITE A BIT. AS YOU AIMED OUT, I PUT ON ' T SEE THE LINK BELOW OF WHAT THEY ' RE TALKING READY TO OUR GROWTH. SO I WOULD AGREE WITH YOU, THE WEBSITE TRAFFIC SHE ' S SPEAKING
ABOUT IS NOT IMPACTED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT. > > TO REGARD CONNECTION I HAVE TO RESTATE WHAT EXPENSE JUDD STATED. THERE ARE STREETS THAT ATTACH FERRINGTON ROAD WITH FALCON BRIDGE, AND THOSE WILL CERTAINLY INEVITABLY WHEN THE INTERCHANGE IS BUILT SEE AN RISE IN TRAFFIC.I WOULD ALSO AGREE THAT I WEAR ' T SEE SHORT TERM, UNTIL THAT HAPPENS, ANY DEMAND OR CAPACITY TO PUNCTURE ON CLEORA AND CRESCENT DRIVE. > > I ASSUMED I HAD ANOTHER PERSON CONCERN. IF IT PROGRESSES, CAN YOU SPEAK ABOUT THE SAFETY PLAN, PROJECT CONCERNS AND HOW YOU WILL MANAGE CONSTRUCTION FUNCTION I AN INTERSECTION THAT IS SO HEAVILY TESTED NOW? > > THAT ' S ANOTHER PERSON GREAT QUESTION. IF I TIN RAISE ANOTHER PERSON MAP? THANK YOU. AMONG THE GREAT POINTS CONCERNING TH RENOVATIONS >> WE ' RE SUGGESTING IS THEY ALL HAPPEN ON THE OUTSIDE.WE ' RE NOT PROPOSING ANYTHING THAT NEEDS WIDENING BECAUSE THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT. IN OTHER WORDS, YOU ' RE DEALING WITH THE OUTSIDE WHILE TRAFFIC CONTAINER BE KEPT WITH THE PASSAGE. >> YOU ' LL ALSO NOTICE THAT ALL THE EXPANDING ON FERRINGTON ROAD IS ALL ON ONE SIDE. I ASSUME I DISCUSSED BEFORE THAT THAT IS INTENTIONAL SO WE DON ' T REDUCE THIS DISTANCE BACK RIGHT HERE
IN BETWEEN FERRINGTON AND I-40. I BELIEVE POSSIBLY WHAT YOU PERHAPS REFERRING TO IS AS FAR AS PHASING OF ENHANCEMENTS, THE ON COMMITMENT I HEARD A PROGRAMMER MAKE IS THAT REGULAR ADVANCEMENTS WOULD COME IN AND DO A PHASING ANALYSIS WITH THE FIRST BUILDING. THE CANDIDATE HAS ACTUALLY COMMITTED TO BUILD ALL OF THE IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE FIRST BUILDING. SO DISTURBANCE TO THE PUBLIC WOULD BE MINIMIZED. > > WELL, TO COMMENT THAT
I STAY IN SOUTHWEST DURHAM. I TRAVELED WITH THIS CROSSWAY QUITE REGULARLY. MY VET USED TO REMAIN IN IN THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY SO I ' M EXTREMELY AWARE OF HOW TESTING IT IS. I WAS ORIGINALLY COMPLETELY OPPOSED TO THIS PROJECT. IT WAS WITH SOME SURPRISE TO MYSELF WHEN I POUR OVER THE T.I.A. AND WENT THROUGH THE WEBSITE TRAFFIC ENHANCEMENTS THAT I THINK THIS WILL BE AN ENHANCEMENT TO THE INTERSECTION DEFINITELY IN THE SHORT TERM. I BELIEVE THE JOB MANAGES A SPECIFIED IN THE T.I.A. THAT TH CITY AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT CONCUR THAT YOU ' RE HANDLING THE WEBSITE TRAFFIC THAT YOUR PROJECT CREATES. I WAS WORRIED REGARDING PEDESTRIA ACTIVITY. WE HEARD COMPLAINTS FROM T.T.A. RIDERS, JUMPING ON AND OFF ON 64th. I APPRECIATE THE DEDICATION FOR PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AND ASSOCIATED ENHANCEMENT. I ACTUALLY THINK YOU ARE DOING An EXCELLENT TASK TO EFFECTIVELY HANDLE THE TRAFFIC AND AT THIS POINT, HEARING SOMETHING ELSE, I WILL CERTAINLY BE SUPPORTING THIS TASK THANK YOU. > > MANY THANKS, RECOGNIZE COUNCIL MEMBERS MOFFAT. > > I WANT THAT THANKS BY APPRECIATING THE PEOPLE RIGHT HERE, INDIVIDUALS SENDING United States E-MAILS, INDIVIDUALS REASONING ABOUT THIS, CONTRIBUTING FEEDBACK.I HAVE An INQUIRY, MR. LEWELLYN YOU STATED SOMETHING EARLIER AMONG THINGS I GO: WAIT A MINUTE, WHAT DID HE SAY? THE QUESTION I HAVE HAS TO DO WITH THE TRANSPORT– I ' M SORRY. THE T.I.P., THE TRANSPORT >> ENHANCEMENT PLAN. I ASSUMED I HEARD YOU SAY THERE IS >> $ 1.6 MILLION IN THE PREPARE FOR IMPROVING THE LINK BETWEEN FERRINGTON ROAD AND I-40 IN THE NEXT YEAR? > > IN THE DRAFT T.I.P.,
I WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF MARK OR WESLEY OR SOMEBODY IN TRANSPORTATION CONTAINER CONFIRM THIS. I LOOKED THIS MORNING IN THE DRAFT 2014 T.I.P., THERE IS $1.6 MILLION ALLOCATED TO THE SLIP RAMP FROM FERRINGTON ROAD TO I-40, YES. > > IT WOULD BE FANTASTIC IF A PERSON COULD TELL ME WHAT A SLIP RAMP IS. > > YES, THAT ' S CORRECT. IN THE EXISTING T.I.P., THERE IS A PROJECT TO CONSTRUCT THE SLIP RAMP >> FROM NORTHBOUND FERRING LOAD TO I-40. THAT IS ROUGHLY 1.6 MILLION. ANY COMPONENT OF THE LARGER PROJECT THAT WAS ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOR 2022, I THINK IN THE STAF RECORD, ANYTHING AFTER 2015 REALLY GO THROUGH THE BRAND-NEW STATE APPROPRIATION FORMULA THAT WAS PASSED THIS >> SUMMER.SO ALL THOSE PRACTICOJECTS WILL CERTAINLY TO GO THROUGH THE PRIORITIZATION WITH THE >> M.P.O., IT'COULD FUNCTION OUT WELL FOR THE HALLWAY, MAY BE FASTER UP, CASH MAY COME TO BE AVAILABLE. IT COULD SPLIT THE OTHER METHOD if THE ESTIMATIONS WEAR ' T WORK OUT. WE ANTICIPATE IT WILL AT THE VERY LEAST BE THE EXISTING DEGREE, IF NOT PRIOR TO AND ACCELERATE. > > IF I AM CLEAR CURRENTLY, THE CLIP RAMP GETS ON WHAT I BELIEVE IS TH SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE JUNCTION AND WOULD NOT BE AFFECTED BY EITHER ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IF THE APPLICANT I WORKING? > > THERE IS ANOTHER PERSON REASON THAT GUESS WE WOULD AGREE THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING WOULD LIKEL REQUIREMENT TO BE ON THE WEST SIDE DUE TO THE SLIP RAMP PROJECT. > > OK. THANKS. I DID HEAR SOMEBODY SAY WE SHOUL MOVE THE JOB ACROSS I-40, UNFORTUNATELY, THAT IS NOT IN THE PURSUE OF WHAT WE CONTAINER DO
>>. INDIVIDUALS BRING US PROJECTS, AND I THEY MEET A ZONING WE CONTAINER LOOK AT THE USE ZONES AND SEE IF THEY ' RE APPROPRIATE, BUT IT DEPENDS ON DEVELOPERS AND CANDIDATES TO CHOOSE WHERE TASKS TAKE PLACE. IF THEY ' RE WITHIN WHAT WE SINIS APPROPRIATE. I APPRECIATE THE CONCEPT. WHEN I TAKE A LOOK AT THIS, I CHECK OUT WHAT IS THE INFLUENCE ON OUR PEOPLE TODAY? WHAT IS THE INFLUENCE ON >> OUR CITIZENS IN THREE DECADES? TODAY IT IS WEB TRAFFIC. 30 YEARS FROM NOW, IT IS TRANSIT.AND ON WEBSITE TRAFFIC, WE HAVE HEARD INDIVIDUALS SAY– I ' VE HEARD YOU SA LOUD AND CLEAR THAT IT IS CLEAR THAT THE WEBSITE TRAFFIC HERE IS FRUSTRATING. IT ' S INTENSE, IT ' S DIFFICULT. I ALSO HEARD THAT THE ENHANCEMENTS THAT THIS TASK WILL CERTAINLY BRING WILL REALLY MAKE THAT SITUATION A BETTER– AT LEAST IN THE SHORT RUN, IF NOT IN THE LONG RUN. AND IF THEY DON ' T MAKE IT BETTE IN THE LONG RUN, IT WON ' T MAKE IT WORSE. AND UM, SO, UM, LIKE MY COWORKER, PRESENTLY, I'' M INCLINED TO VOTE IN– PENDING ANY FURTHER INFORMATION MIGHT STEP FORWARD, I ' M INCLINED TO'SUPPORT THIS PROJECT TONIGHT. THANK YOU. > > RECOGNIZE COUNCILMAN SCHEWEL. > > THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. MR. NOR ELEVATED THE INQUIRY ON WHETHER OR NOT THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK WILL DECREASE THE DEGREE OF SOLUTION. I WAS WONDERING IF OUR TRAFFIC– TRANSPORT PERSONNEL COULD DISCUSS THAT? > > YES, THE CROSSWALK BECAUSE O THE QUANTITY OF TIME IT HAS TO PROVIDE FOR PEDESTRIANS TO CROS THE 54, IT WILL CERTAINLY DECREASE THE LEVE OF SERVICE, PROVIDE HOLD-UPS. IT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO SUPPLY PEDESTRIAN PRESS BUTTONS SO THAT THAT >> DELAY ONLY TAKES PLACE WHEN THERE ARE >> PEDESTRIANS THERE. > > OK. THANK YOU. > > SIMPLY A NUMBER OF COMMENTS. ONE THOUGHT, I WANTED TO PRESENT, MS. KITCHEN, IS I BELIEVE IT MIGHT BE EVEN MORE LIKE ERWIN SQUARE, THAN IT IS LIKE THE PICKLE. SO I LIVE IRWIN SQUARE, WHICH I BELIEVE IS CLOSER IN ELEVATION TO THE BUILDINGS THAT WE ' RE TALKING REGARDING HERE THAN IS THE UNIVERSITY TOWER STRUCTURE, I THINK IT IS CALLED. I LIVE NOT MUCH FROM THAT BUILDING, AND CLOSER TO IT THAN I ANTICIPATE YOU WILL BE TO THESE BUILDINGS. AND MUCH TO MY SURPRISE, IT HAS >> BEEN ABSOLUTELY >> FINE TO HAVE THAT HIGH STRUCTURE THERE. IT IS IN An EXCELLENT LOCATION. I ASSUME IN MANY WAYS, THESE TAL BUILDINGS WILL CERTAINLY REMAIN IN A GREAT AREA. I PUT ON ' T KNOW IF THAT GIVES YOU ANY CONVENIENCE AT ALL, I DO WANT TO INFORM YOU MY EXPERIENCE'. AND OUR NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBORS LIKE YOURS EXPERIENCE A GREAT DEAL OF CUT-THROUGH AS WELL. I WILL CLAIM THE TRAFFIC HUMPS HAVE AIDED ON SOME STREETS. I WISH YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO GET THOSE. YOU KNOW, I THINK THIS IS A LOCATION THAT– IT ' S SIMPLY– THIS LOCATION IS A PROBLEM. THAT ' S NOT GON NA MODIFICATION, WHETHER OR NOT THIS DEVELOPMENT EXPERIENCES OR NOT. THERE IS A GREAT DEAL OF TRAFFIC ON TH ROADWAY AND EXCESSIVE WEB TRAFFIC IN TH JUNCTION. WHAT I WILL CERTAINLY SAY IS I HAD GONE INTO THIS PROCEDURE ASSUMING I WOULD PROBABLY BE IN RESISTANCE TO THIS DEVELOPMENT, BUT I, AFTER RESEARCHING THE TRANSPORTATION RENOVATIONS, COSTS A GREAT DEAL OF TIME WITH THE REPORT, ANALYSIS THE 54 CORRIDOR STUDY, I WEAR ' T THINK THAT THIS IN ANY WAY OPPOSES THAT STUDY.I THINK THAT THIS ACTUALLY, IN TERMS OF THE TRAFFIC, I BELIEVE THAT– OUR TEAM VERIFIES THAT I BELIEVE THAT THESE IMPROVEMENTS COMPORT WITH THAT RESEARCH. AND I THINK THAT IN LOTS OF WAYS, THIS WILL CERTAINLY BE An ASSISTANCE DISTRICT FOR THE TRANSPORTATION THAT WILL CERTAINLY ULTIMATELY COME. IT IS PERHAPS NOT QUITE AS CLOSE AS WE MIGHT HAVE DESIRED IT TO THAT TERMINAL, BUT IT IS REASONABLY CLOSE. WE TALK ABOUT EASE OF ACCESS OF JOBS ALONG THE TRANSPORTATION LINE.'AND GOD WILLING, AND THE CREEK DON ' T INCREASE, THAT TRANSPORTATION LINE WILL CERTAINLY AT SOME POINT HEAD OUT THERE, IT WILL BE A NODE FOR JOBS FOR INDIVIDUALS AND IT WILL CERTAINLY SUCCEED. SO I PLAN TO ASSISTANCE THIS AND I WISH TO SAY ANOTHER THING.WHICH IS AN APPRECIATE THE WORK OF OUR TEAM ON THIS. YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE COMMENTS FROM OUR TEAM, THE SEVERITIES WHICH THEY ALWAYS TAKE POINTS, THE PREPARING AND TRANSPORT PERSONNEL KNOW THIS TASK IN INTINATE DETAIL. IT IS USEFUL TO US. I INTEND TO THANK YOU ALL, ALL TH ORGANIZERS, TRANSPORTATION PEOPLE RIGHT HERE THIS EVENING. IT IS MUCH VALUED. THANKS, MR. MAYOR. > > ANY OTHER REMARKS? ACKNOWLEDGE COUNCILMAN BROWN. > > SORRY. MOST OF US KNOW AND AGREE ON ONE CONCERN. THAT IS THAT THE WEBSITE TRAFFIC AT THIS CROSSWAY IS
HORRENDOUS. AND WHAT WE ALSO KNOW IS THAT THAT CONDITION QUO WILL NOT CHANGE, UNLESS A TASK SUCH AS THIS IS AUTHORIZED. THAT WILL CERTAINLY BOOST AND EMBELLISH WHAT IS PROBLEMATIC TRAFFIC LOCATION. SO THE INQUIRY FOR ME IS: WILL THIS ADVANCEMENT IMPROVE THE TRAFFIC CIRCUMSTANCE AT THAT JUNCTION DURING THE MEANTIME? THE INT INTERIM, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, MAY BE EVEN MORE THAN 2022. IF YOU FOLLOW AND HAVE COGNIZANCE OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF TRANSPORT, PARTICULARLY. THEIR BUDGET PLAN PRIORITIES, AND TH REALITY THAT MONEY ' S BECOMING SCARCE. WE COULD BE– THIS IMPROVEMENT COULD BE MORE THAN SIMPLY A YEARS RENOVATION. IT COULD BE A 15-YEAR ENHANCEMENT. OR AN 18-YEAR ENHANCEMENT. I REALLY HOPE NOT, BUT THAT ' S THE HARS FACT WE NEED TO FACE. I WOULD NOT BE LEANING IN THE DIRECTION OF SUPPORTING THIS PROJECT WITHOUT THE MEANINGFUL, I ASSUME, PROFFE THAT THE PROGRAMMERS PROVIDED TONIGHT ON THE
PEDESTRIAN RIGHT-OF-WAY. WITHOUT A DOUBT, THAT WAS JUST ONE OF MY MAJOR CONCERNS THAT TO INVEST GREATER THAN A MILLION DOLLARS ON WEBSITE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT, BUT TO TRANSFORM THEIR BACK ON PEDESTRIANS WAS SOMETHING I COULD NOT SUPPORT, PERSONALLY. SO I AM PLEASED THAT YOU TOOK THE ACTIONS YOU DID TONIGHT. AND I WILL BE SUPPORTING THIS TASK AS WELL.THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. > > ANY OTHER COMMENTS, QUESTIONS? OTHERWISE, ENTERTAIN A MOVEMENT ON THE ITEM. DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THE MOVEMENT IS? > > ASSISTANCE, WITH THE EXTRA PROFFER. > > OK. MADAM CLERK, OPEN THE VOTE. SHUT THE BALLOT. > > IT PASSES 6-0. > > ANY OTHER ITEMS TO FIND BEFORE THE COUNCIL TONIGHT? > > YES, MR. MAYOR. > > RECOGNIZE CITY CLERK. > > YES, LOU W. ROSE RECEIVED 4 VOTES FOR THE CITY AREA PAYMENT. > > THANKS. SATISFYING ADJOURNED AT 9:38 P.M. THANKS.
> > I THOUGHT I HAD ANOTHER PERSON INQUIRY. > > THAT ' S ANOTHER VERY GOOD INQUIRY. > > IF I AM CLEAR NOW, THE CLIP RAMP IS ON WHAT I THINK IS TH SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE CROSSWAY AND WOULD NOT BE AFFECTED BY EITHER ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IF THE CANDIDATE I WORKING? > > RECOGNIZE COUNCILMAN SCHEWEL. > > YES, MR. MAYOR.