Nazis learned from different people in the United States and I ' m referring to Margaret Sanger and also William Gates the initial, the finest means to get rid of the individuals you put on ' t desire is to obtain rid of them
prior to they'' re born, which is why all the Planned Being a parent ' s around the United States are in the internal cities.So there ' s a great deal of deception going on.- There will certainly be time later in the conference as well, however you ' re welcome to make your comments currently if you can ' t stay ' til then. I ' d like to ask the CAO, if you can address rapidly to highlight the area ' s initiatives to reconstruct our reserves which I completely sustain including those designated for building as well as obligation, which is a concern.I think we ' re not at the objective we require to be in those areas.
Nazis learned from various individuals in the United States as well as I ' m referring to Margaret Sanger as well as William Gates the first, the ideal method to obtain rid of the people you wear ' t want is to get rid of them
prior to they'' re born, which is why all the Planned Parenthood ' s around the United States are in the inner cities.So there ' s a great deal of deceptiveness going on. It ' s very crucial for us, particularly in our area in the City of Watsonville due to the fact that you ' re well mindful, it ' s essential that the Ombudsman has paid the volunteers in order to offer defense for our elders. I live in South Area and also it ' s great to get anywhere north before 10 o ' clock in the early morning and also after that there ' s not traveler traffic. You can talk after that, or if you can ' t keep ' til after that, you ' re welcome to speak now. I ' d like to ask the CAO, if you can respond to promptly to highlight the county ' s initiatives to reconstruct our books which I totally support including those designated for residential property and responsibility, which is a concern.I think we ' re not at the goal we need to be in those locations.In addition, the number of housing project ' s currently in the County ' s allowing pipe, as well as the elevated license activity we ' ve seen in recent years point to a possible increase in demand for market rate permits, that might continue via following year.It ' s also important to consider that state regulations proceeds to fine-tune state housing in ADU regulations and pass extra bills intended at improving real estate permits, an enhancing infill growth such as Us senate Costs 9, which allows up to 4 systems to be builds on existing single family great deals. We can ' t offer enough public services to fulfill the development of more citizens yet there ' s likewise, to me, the opposite going on here because we sanctuary ' t grown, we can provide adequate public solutions, and also we see that in terms of our restrictions on our capacity to work with. As far as the State ' s worried, we beat the required, but what I ' m getting at is fair share for the whole County.And we ' ve seen even more of that in the last couple of years, which is excellent.
The DOF also keeps in mind that the state ' s current negative growth prices is the outcome of a couple of significant aspects consisting of the continuing decrease in all-natural boost as infant boomers age and also that ' s births minus deaths.Continuing declines, in kind, foreign immigration, which has been accelerated by recent federal plan delays in procedure rise fatalities associated with the COVID-19 pandemic as well as boost in domestic out-migration. In enhancement, the number of housing project ' s currently in the County ' s permitting pipe, as well as the elevated license task we ' ve seen in current years point to a potential increase in need for market price permits, that might continue through following year.It ' s additionally vital to consider that state regulations proceeds to improve state housing in ADU laws and also pass additional costs aimed at streamlining real estate permits, an enhancing infill development such as Senate Bill 9, which allows up to 4 devices to be builds on existing single family lots. Sometimes they do assume that they ' re in conflict also, so we don ' t differ with you. We can ' t deal sufficient public services to meet the development of more locals yet there ' s also, to me, the opposite going on here due to the fact that we haven ' t grown, we can provide sufficient public services, and also we see that in terms of our constraints on our capability to hire. As far as the State ' s worried, we defeated the required, yet what I ' m obtaining at is reasonable share for the whole County.And we ' ve seen even more of that in the last few years, which is great.Exactly how many residences that are actually building? – I don'' t have those in front of me today, but I can obtain you those numbers, if you'' re interested. – It'' s rather very easy to see some Districts sanctuary'' t included much in any way as well as I know, 2 or 3 have that in mostly all of them. – I will certainly state that Measure J does, it sets established the USL, the Urban Solutions Line, therefore, we are mandated by Step J as well as also by our housing that are meant to route advancement in the direction of the Urban Solutions Line within that area.
– Okay. Yes, thank you extremely much. – Mm-hmm. – Thank you. Manager Caput. I certainly appreciate the sentiment of designating the units equally between the areas. I think if you look, at the very least, at the thickness reward info, economical thickness incentive details included in this item. You see, I mean, I think every among those jobs was in the 1st Area. And I assume that'' s easy to understand considered that a large component of the area that'' s both unincorporated and also within the Urban Solutions Line is in either the 1st or the 2nd. I don'' t believe that 20 %, as you state, would certainly be appropriate always on the north coastline, beyond the Urban Solutions Line, yet within the third District. Or certainly, we wouldn'' t desire to improve … -In fact, if you check out Area 4, we have the smallest unincorporated area of each district. So since the populace is focused around Watsonville, we have a smaller location than a few of the other areas. – Okay. Thanks. If there'' s nothing else comments from Board Members, we ' ll open it for public comment.Sitting down here
in chambers, exists any individual online? – Yes, Chair. We do have audio speakers online. Calling customer 1, your microphone is currently available. – [inaudible] affordable for whom? We have increasingly more homeless individuals, and also as you build out the facilities, you'' re building out all these broadband that numerous of those supervisors are pushing. And also I see on the authorization program right here, [inaudible] the permission schedule [inaudible] 24 state'' s consent products include regular company that does not require conversation. What it needs to say, it'' s just the elite Board of Supervisors might discuss these products, however the public is excluded from reviewing them. What'' s incorrect? I intend to refer people, and also I raised the question of problem of rate of interest of particular Board participants with this wireless microwave broadband- – Ms. Garett, we'' re going over the Growth Goal, [crosstalk] not cordless broadband. – Yeah. A frequently asked concerns, I'' m referring to cellphonetaskforce.org, [email protected] Ms. Garett, please straight your item, [crosstalk] your remarks to the Product handy. -I ' m 80 years of ages and I'wish to comment. What is cordless technology-[ crosstalk] -Thanks Ms. Garett. [faint]-Customer finishing in 2915, your microphone is now readily available. -Thank you. This is Becky Steinbruner. Can you hear me? -Yes, thank you. – Thank you. I wish to comment that the Development Objective for the county in 2020 as well as 2021 was really lower than 0.5%. It was 0.25% to acknowledge the genuine problems, and also particularly the constraints of infrastructure in our county. So this is not the least expensive and I request that it be decreased to 0.25%, to once more, mirror the constraints of infrastructure to serve these individuals. I mosted likely to a seminar of MBAP. You had an audio speaker from there earlier. And at the time, Legislator Wiener was talking about how we require to construct, construct, build. There were people from the Salinas Valley saying, “” Yeah, well, we can'' t, due to the fact that we wear ' t have the water, we'don ' t have the facilities.” His reply was, “” Well, if you build, develop, construct, as well as points obtain miserable sufficient for the individuals, they will concur to pass a tax to assist you obtain the cash to make the improvements.”” Which'' s what I bother with here.
I think this is not CEQA excluded. You have raised the Development Objective from in 2014 as well as the previous year, there requires to be CEQA analysis of the impacts of that on power, infrastructure and water. I believe that this county must enhance the Action J need to be much more according to the city of Watsonville'' s 20%economical demands, as well as to enhance the allocation to really low as well as low earnings people. Stating it'' s budget-friendly is one point,'but when it ' s for modest revenue, that is a great deal of cash if you take a look at the mean income in this region, and those who are really bad are not being offered. I additionally assume we need to include rentals. That was omitted from the county'' s Action J work … by the real estate. – Thanks, Ms. Steinbruner. – Orchard House, your microphone is now offered. – Great early morning, everybody. Can you hear me? – Yes. – Impressive. Thank you for your time. Well, I found that discussion very intriguing, specifically our boost and decrease in population over the last years. And also what'' s not being attended to because, that I assume we should take notification is, the age of which our population is raising and growing.I have a buddy of mine that'' s an elderly manager at Pajaro Valley Unified College District, our biggest area. And also he tells me that our registration over the last 5 years approximately has decreased by around 10 to 15%. And if that fad proceeds, we'' re visiting institution starting to be forced to be folded and such. In truth, we'' re currently seeing that Good Shepherd shut. Therefore, as we talked regarding the housing that we require, I wish to advise the Board as well as preparing division to think about that we need real estate that'' s additionally particular for this generation, that is actually being hit hardest by this. Our school teachers or people beginning out in occupations, they are entirely evaluated right now.And we ' re losing population because important segment that provides services for all of us. So I wish you guys consider that, and also we move on in an enhancing variety of RV utilized and small homes and starter homes like that can be paid for. And also that this brand-new growth not be done simply by big inexpensive housing developers, that you enable us in the area to really take part in this, because we can construct it more inexpensive than anybody else. Thank you. -Thanks.-We have no further audio speakers online, Chair. – All right. We have a speaker right here in chambers. -Greetings again. My name is James Ewing Whitman. I should confess, I ' m gon na require to look up what Procedure J is specifies in 1979. I question what other regulations, policies, legislations, or programs really plainly meant out then that are taking place currently. With the growth of structure and also stuff in the population, who knows what ' s mosting likely to take place. To go back to a fact that was shared throughout public remarks as much as, the people that actually died from COVID, that was 73%. The really reason why I ' m standing up right here is, I made a note of federal legislation being broken by someone quiting a person else from speaking.So I guess, I obtained to take the time to discover out what that federal regulation is, so that stops occurring because Marilyn Garett is attaching some dots that would take rather a bit of time to actually connect as well as make the connections, yet they are genuine and they are precise, so thank you.-Thanks, Mr. Whitman. I see no various other participant that desires to deal with on this Product, I ' ll return to the board for action. -Thanks. Mr. Chair, I move the advised action.-Second. -Activity by Supervisor McPherson. Second by Manager Good friend to take on the recommended action. Any type of further conversation? Seeing none, Clerk, roll call that, please. -Manager Pal?- Aye.- Coonerty?-Aye. -Caput?-Aye.-McPherson?-Aye. -And Koenig?- Aye. -Thing passes all.-Thank you, Ms. Williams. We ' ll currently continue to Product 8, a public hearing to think about in idea regulation of the Board of Supervisors of the Area of Santa Cruz, amending Santa Cruz Region Code Chapter 13.10, to add Provisions pertaining to tiny homes on wheels.Adopt resolution affirming changes are exempt from the California Environmental High Quality Act. Arrange of the regulation for final fostering on October 18th, 2022.
Generally, the actions is outline of the memorandum of the Replacement County Administrative Police Officer, as well as Supervisor of Community Advancement and Infrastructure. And also for record on this Product, we have Source Coordinator David Carlson. Mr. Carlson take it away.-Thanks, Chair. [time out] Okay, got the modern technology figured out. This project is regarding allowing for the initial time, the usage of small homes on wheels as an extra real estate choice in the Region to address the County ' s housing requirements. The discussion will certainly describe what a small residence is, summarized the planning process in the approach to producing the statute, describe the ordinance and also some details about the ordinance. And also then ultimately offer a staff suggestion. A Tiny Residence on Wheels is a particular kind of non-motorized rv called a park trailer as well as it ' s specified in the California Wellness As well as Security code 18009.3. It ' s a residence on a trailer, no larger than 400 gross square feet as well as no'broader than 14 feet as well as it ' s built on a solitary framework trailer typically, they are developed to appear like a small residence using numerous layout and also product options.They are signed up as a park trailer with the DMV and also they can be hauled on public roadways with an unique permit from the DMV. They can be bought from a certified producer that has actually created the Tiny Home on Wheels according to a well-known National Requirement for park trailers or they can be constructed by a proprietor home builder on website under the supervision of a qualified evaluation firm. The Tiny Residence on Tires would certainly feature a certification recording the Tiny Home on Wheels fulfills the approved requirement for park trailers. For this sort of framework, the regional structure inspector would be validating the unit has the third-party qualification and also would just be inspecting the on-site setup according to the accepted site plan as well as link to utilities. So, team was previously directed by the Board of Supervisors to pursue this task. My colleague Sissy Allen conducted a huge amount of outreach in the kind of community conferences, surveys, and research study as prep work for development of the proposed regulations. Real Estate Advisory Commission have given input and instructions at previous meetings finishing in the Preparation Compensation ' s.The Preparation Commission and the suggestion that the Board of Supervisors adopt the suggested ordinance offered today. The Planning Commission recommended the regulation be restricted right now to
enable Tiny Residence on Wheels to work as a new building and construction ADU, anywhere an ADU is allowed. In creating the ordinance, personnel tried to keep the most basic strategy feasible as well as construct a recommended regulation that does not duplicate existing needs that relate to ADUs. The ordinance simply resolves the special elements of small houses and integrates all various other existing demands by reference. The policies in the suggested ordinance would not transform anything relative to needs of fire agencies, water, sewage disposal requirements, as well as environmental resources and constraints that may influence a residential or commercial property. Other factors to consider include that Tiny Homes on Wheels since they are registered with the DMV are not assessed for the function of property tax; however, enhancements to the property such as the framework connected with the Tiny Residence on Tires may come for the purposes of residential or commercial property tax.Tiny House on Wheels can count towards the area ' s local housing demands or allotment or arena under certain conditions which team believes holds true under the suggested ordinance alterations. The recommended statute would certainly allow a Tiny Residence on Wheels to work as the or else enabled brand-new construction ADU on a building such that the total number of units does not surpass what is currently permitted on the home. The majority of jurisdictions in the state that have comparable ordinances have taken this path. Typically the building would certainly already be established with solitary household house and also may even have a junior ADU, as well as this would certainly allow an optimum 400 square foot 14-foot high, tiny residence to operate as the new building ADU. It additionally must be noted that the proposed ordinance would certainly have prospective advantages for those that lost their residences in the CZU fire and that the ADU policies permit the building of an ADU before the main residence when it comes to rebuilding after a calamity. The area of the main home should be revealed on the website prepares for the ADU authorization, yet there ' s no demand or timeline for really building the main unit.This provision is currently in the ADU policies as well as it can be utilized now to construct an ADU on a conventional foundation, as well as this ordinance would permit that ADU to be a tiny residence on wheels. Regarding location on the parcel as a whole, the Tiny House might be located anywhere that an ADU could be located under existing regulations. A parking pad would certainly need to be attended to
the Tiny Residence in an area that would certainly permit the Tiny Home to be securely relocated onto or off the car park as well as the property pad can not be situated in the existing driveway. Attach to utilities would certainly have to fulfill current plumbing and also electrical code requirements and also there are arrangements for making use of solar power, and limitations on using generators. The regulation includes some layout as well as materials standards that are meant to mimic a normal house and also recommendations the fire safety criteria in the instance of a Tiny House on Tires situated in the wildland metropolitan user interface area.For the Planning Payment direction, the license would go through revival every 3 years or when the Tiny House on Wheels is communicated to a brand-new owner or when the Tiny Residence on Wheels is eliminated from the building, whichever occurs initially. The license process would resemble the normal license process for an ADU except the strategy check would involve validating the system fulfills the ANSI A119.5 criterion for Park Design Motor homes and has valid DMV registration for towing onto the residential property. The staff recommendation is that the Board of Supervisors conducts a public hearing to take into consideration proposed amendments to the county code and neighborhood coastal program that provide regulations associated to Tiny Residences on Tires, take on the affixed resolution, finding the proposed amendments are constant with the basic plan and also local Coastal program, as well as exempt from more ecological testimonial under the California Environmental Top Quality Act, as well as guiding staff to submit the CEQA Notice of Exception and send the local coastal program amendments to the California Coastal Compensation for certification. A tried and tested principle and also regulation amending region code Phase 13.10 to include arrangements relating to Tiny Residence on Wheels, schedule the regulation for second analysis as well as final adoption on October 18, 2022, and also direct personnel to carry out modifications outside the seaside zone on the 31st day after final adoption inside the seaside zone upon final certification by the Coastal Compensation which ends my presentation.I ' m available for remarks or inquiries. Thanks. Mr. Carlson. Are there remarks or inquiries from members of the board?-Yes, Mr. Chair. I do have some if that ' s proper now.-Proceed. -All. Thank you, Mr. Carlson for discussion. I am supportive, as a whole, of the idea of what ' s being offered today. I do have some clearing up questions and also I assume some alterations in the statute that need to be made, and then one simply kind of more comprehensive concern pertaining to on the evaluation side. My initial concern does take care of, I ' d listen to the Preparation Compensation conversation, I didn ' t see anywhere within the statute that it was explicit that all those seemed the wish of the Planning Payment, and I think when the board had our initial discussions concerning the procedure here that the Tiny Homes on Tires would be restricted to 1 per property.Is there something that I ' ve missed out on within the ordinance that details that straight of a remark?-I believe just by procedure of just how the statute is established, that is mosting likely to hold true because in enabling them in location of the new construction ADU, our existing ADU laws only enable one ADU per home along the road of a Junior ADU which would certainly become part of the existing single-family residence. This ordinance would not boost the permitted thickness on a residential or commercial property above as well as past what ' s currently allowed in State and regional regulations.
So, that would certainly be in the regular case with a solitary household local 3 systems that single-family homeowners ' the major unit possible Junior ADU and after that the possible New Construction ADU. -Okay. Well, if the board is in arrangement with several of the various other clean-up language or tips that I have when it ' s feasible, it would certainly just make that more explicit on a very first read stepping forward due to the fact that I believe that in some cases it ' s where, I assume many of the time, is ideal to simply have actually something explicitly laid out in order so there isn ' t really any concern of analysis on that.In Section E-1, there is a discussion regarding solar and in certain about the generators, as you had discussed. The generator can ' t be a main source of power within the country as well as urban. I do have a problem though that it'seems to enable it as a key resource outside of that but I do recognize that in my district, we received– however first of, the board with a few of the– as you know, due to the fact that your department brought it onward, we ' ve made generator'changes to attempt as well as avoid generators as any kind of kind of
key source of power for environmental noise reasons. There are circumstances beyond the country solutions line where property lines are the habitable structures or truly nearby to, fairly frankly, one more habitable structure also though they may be on [faint] large acreage.Those have been conflict indicate your code compliance has actually had to handle when generators have actually run in some cases for essentially months at once as a primary source of power. Am I correct in analysis that under the existing statute as suggested, if it was outside of the rural solutions line, a generator could be used as a main power resource, or is the language maybe simply inartful in a method where I ' m misunderstanding that and also we need to clarify that I can ' t?-I believe it ' s the last. Maybe the language is unartful however it does say that beyond the rural as well as metropolitan solutions line of Tiny House on Wheels may include arrangements for connection to a generator, and after that it goes on to say that, that standby emergency situation generator requires to adhere to the provisions of 1315 sound preparation, which just allows a generator to be made use of to finish on an emergency situation standby basis in a single-family zone.So, I assume it might probably be written. I assume you ' re appropriate. I assume it probably might be composed clearly, but that ' s the intent. -Okay. And the reason I ask is due to the fact that we define within the metropolitan and also rural services line that it shall not rely on it as a main source and after that we set apart outside of that without that very same language? I assume that period, it shouldn ' t be a primary resource and after that we need to have some type of clarity of defining what an emergency situation is within the noise. I indicate, if it isn ' t promptly defined within sound preparation since we ' ve had challenges within the backwoods of individuals declaring that these generators were required under that construct that'made enforcement tough. I suggest, genuinely we ' re not trying to find 128 dB circumstance within a hundred feet of someone ' s house to be running 24/7 even under an emergency basis. Well, somebody ' s specifying it as an emergency basis. I do believe'that we simply require some clearing up language as well as clean-up language in concerns to that.You just have a [ inaudible] the other elements of the code as well as additionally to integrate within that. So, I appreciate that clearness, but if I review it the way I read it, after that I think of that it can be interpreted differently by others too. The last as well as third problem I have carried the ordinance present language is in concerns to H2 and also you would certainly state this, this is just concerning the'revival of the 3-year renewal.There ' s kind of some contradictory language in between 2 and also 3 that I know it can just be tidied up, which is that when a permit will expire, but after that on number 2, and afterwards on number 3, it claims that it shall be subject to renewal every 3 years, and also after that mentions or when it ' s communicated, however above it, it says that if it ' s shared, after that basically, there ' s no license anymore. You require a new permit. So there ' s clashing language there, that I believe just needs to be cleaned up, which is we can design this after the, as you discussed, the trip [ inaudible] which is very clear that simply says, it will end on the first business day'on or after the day, 3 years of the date of approval.It doesn ' t convey duration, and if it obtains moved, etcetera. Therefore, I simply assume that on 2 as well as 3, that language likewise needs to be tidied up. My last point is really a much more comprehensive point, as well as this gets on the plan side which remains in regards to the reality that it'doesn ' t get approved for a residential property tax obligation evaluation and also I totally recognize why. I do have a'question of whether we ' ve run any kind of kind of analysis regarding what the influences would be to services in relation to this. In specific, if people are electing to do it which is in fact I believe among the objectives below basically to replace it, to be a less easier-to-do and also pricey ADU element. ADUs as you know are allowed to do reassessments of the home. So the region is getting funds connected with it for necessary civil services. In this situation, we would be getting nothing from what I can gather. So has your personnel done an analysis concerning what those influences would certainly be? If so, is that baked right into what you would certainly translate the authorization cost to be or simply help me understand just how the county would certainly get charges of what services would certainly be called for'with the proliferation or expansion of this?-We have had some discussions with the assessor ' s workplace, although we place ' t done a measurable evaluation of what this would certainly mean.I think one of the factors that the Planning Commission did not desire to allow these as main units as if they would certainly set up this pretty raw fairness issue where you may have bordering residential or commercial properties, one paying real estate tax on a single-family home and also the various other one beside it with a tiny house is the primary device not paying real estate tax on that particular device.
My very first inquiry does deal with, I ' d listen to the Preparation Compensation conversation, I didn ' t see anywhere within the statute that it was explicit that all those appeared to be the need of the Preparation Commission, as well as I believe when the board had our initial conversations concerning the process here that the Tiny Residences on Wheels would be limited to 1 per property.Is there something that I ' ve missed within the regulation that lays out that straight of a remark? Well, if the board is in arrangement with some of the various other clean-up language or pointers that I have when it ' s possible, it would certainly just make that more explicit on a first read coming ahead due to the fact that I think that occasionally it ' s where, I think many of the time, is ideal to just have something explicitly laid out in order so there isn ' t actually any concern of interpretation on that.In Section E-1, there is a discussion about solar and also in certain about the generators, as you had stated. I suggest, realistically we ' re not looking for 128 dB situation within a hundred feet of someone ' s house to be running 24/7 also under an emergency basis. The third and last problem I have had on the regulation current language is in regards to H2 and also you would certainly mention this, this is just about the'renewal of the 3-year renewal.There ' s kind of some contradictory language in between 2 as well as 3 that I know it can simply be cleaned up, which is that when a license shall run out, however then on number 2, and after that on number 3, it states that it will be subject to renewal every 3 years, and after that points out or when it ' s conveyed, yet above it, it claims that if it ' s shared, then in essence, there ' s no license any longer.-We have had some discussions with the assessor ' s workplace, although we haven ' t done a quantitative analysis of what this would mean.I believe one of the reasons that the Preparation Payment did not desire to enable these as key devices as if they would certainly set up this rather stark fairness concern where you might have bordering homes, one paying residential property tax obligation on a single-family house and also the various other one following to it with a small house is the primary unit not paying home tax obligation on that system.And also after that the quantity of property tax that would be type of forgone or not forgone, I presume, but you understand, not gathered since they'' re registered with the DMV, they ' re not evaluated as real home, was not seen as a substantial or actually significant sufficient to that. It ' s in, and it ' s out, and also simply have the 2 authorizations required for simply those 2 instances. I'believe it ' s achievable, but I put on ' t know that it appears unneeded to me.It seems also that ministerial authorization processing would use for little houses on wheels within 60 days of invoice.
As well as after that the amount of residential property tax obligation that would certainly be sort of forgone or not discarded, I guess, yet you know, not accumulated due to the fact that they'' re registered with the DMV, they ' re not analyzed as genuine residential or commercial property, was not seen as a significant or actually significant adequate to that. I wasn ' t promoting on the main component as well as I agree with the Planning Payment ' s analysis of that. We wear'' t understand what the replacement component would certainly be and also component of this from a policy viewpoint is ensuring that we in fact allow this as a less pricey alternative to do exactly that.But then I
think that we shall have or need to have a measurable evaluation done so we have an understanding of what the fees would be based on the effects as well as at the board if we'' re already cleaning up the other language, we would have some sense of what that is when it comes back so that we can have it all constructed into a very first read in October, to just recognize what those costs are. It ' s in, and also it ' s out, and simply have the 2 permits needed for just those 2 instances. I'think it ' s practical, yet I put on ' t understand that it appears unneeded to me.It seems also that pastoral license processing would apply for tiny homes on wheels within 60 days of invoice.When it comes to taxes, individuals don ' t treatment if it ' s building taxes or not due to the fact that you ' re gon na have to pay sales tax on this. And as far as the 5-year authorization, once more, you ' re asking for irreversible infrastructure of that financial investment as well as I ' m going to have to come back every few years to retest that.That has the possibility for a property owner to take a large loss if there ' s any type of regulation adjustments from right here and also there. And also, it ' s not going to match the pitch of the roofing of the building where it ' s going to be placed.That ' s simply 1 example out of your 6 layout aspects that I believe will certainly make it extremely hard and essentially impossible.
-No, I think we wouldn'' t since I wear ' t believe there ' s other comparable stipulations in other jurisdictions, statutes in terms of permit renewal. If they ' re all on wheels, I wear ' t understand. When it comes to tax obligations, individuals don ' t treatment if it ' s residential property taxes or not because you ' re gon na have to pay sales tax obligation on this. And also as far as the 5-year permit, once more, you ' re asking for permanent framework of that investment and also I ' m going to have to come back every couple of years to retest that.That has the possibility for a property owner to take a huge loss if there ' s any kind of policy adjustments from right here and also there. And, it ' s not going to match the pitch of the roofing system of the structure where it ' s going to be placed.That ' s just 1 example out of your 6 design elements that I think will make it very hard and also basically impossible.- I ' d like to include it as well as if you put on ' t believe it ' s going to make that much of a difference or if any difference at all. And so I wear ' t understand exactly how it would certainly be in result by altering that to a key house, but that ' s what I ' m attempting to make clear that there wouldn ' t be well, two. I would certainly instead have a policy that includes in this worry currently as well as if the issue is found to be really excessively restrictive or unneeded, then that ' s something that can be part of the review in a year or whenever, whatever causes the testimonial to come back to us so that I recognize that you ' re doing the Preparation Compensation at 25, yet if you desire to have a time particular on that, it doesn ' t requirement to be component of this activity because I believe it ' s supplementary to the regulation, but I ' m still going to stick to the method the motion is presently provided.
– I ' d like to include it and also if you don ' t think it ' s going to make that much of a difference or if any type of difference at all. As well as so I put on ' t recognize just how it would be in effect by transforming that to a main residence, yet that ' s what I ' m trying to make clear that there wouldn ' t be well, two. I mean, we ' re simply trying to be very certain because of the code.While I understand programmatically, however doesn ' t clearly claim that they ' re currently limited to one. I would rather have a policy that adds in this worry currently and if the concern is discovered to be in fact extremely limiting or unnecessary, then that ' s something that can be component of the evaluation in a year or whenever, whatever activates the evaluation to come back to us so that I recognize that you ' re doing the Preparation Payment at 25, however if you want to have a time particular on that, it doesn ' t demand to be part of this movement because I assume it ' s ancillary to the statute, but I ' m still going to stick to the means the activity is presently offered.-I don ' t see just how that ' s different from the language I ' ve been chatting concerning for the last 15 mins.For the past couple of weeks, our staff has actually functioned carefully to pull this item and discussion with each other. My remorse is that we wear'' t have even more time to prepare and also go over for this obstacle which we weren'' t a lot more positive with the pending deadline for Coastal Compensation to do something about it on our LCP Change. Keeping that, I do wish to turn the microphone over to David Carlson that will certainly provide a discussion and will certainly offer more information to this subject. Thanks. – Okay. Thanks, Matt for that intro. The presentation will certainly concentrate on the Coastal Payment discuss the Area'' s Regional Coastal Program Amendments concerning coastal risks and just how we can move the project ahead. The discussion will evaluate a short background and timeline of the task, sum up the major issues, and supply a team suggestion. In late June, very early July of this year, the Regional Coastal Commission Office educated the County, they would recommend the Coastal Commission reject the Neighborhood Coastal Program Change and also recommended that the County withdraw the amendments.If the Area doesn ' t withdraw the amendments, the team referral for rejection would go on the Compensation ' s October 12th with 14th schedule for action before the October 21st, 2022 due date for the Commission to do something about it. The Coastal Payment team has interacted a variety of issues with the current LCP Amendment, yet this slide shows the overarching difference between the region'' s existing amendments and Coastal Compensation shared policy.The key distinction involves shoreline security frameworks or armoring. The Region Plan follows the Coastal Act in that just existing frameworks might qualify for coastline armory. Nevertheless, the interpretation of existing growth or an existing home is where the policies split. The county has constantly defined existing growth as whatever is legally feeding on the home when an application is submitted. The Coastal Act doesn'' t define an existing structure but the Coastal Compensation ' s interpretation is that structures built after the implementation of the Coastal Act on January first, 1977, or older frameworks that have been redeveloped considering that enactment of the Coastal Act are no much longer existing frameworks and are not entitled to any kind of type of coastline armoring, whether the armoring is existing or recommended. In this context, the interpretation of redevelopment ends up being truly essential and this is an additional area where plans deviate. The consolidated policy differences have substantial effects for residential or commercial properties on seaside bluffs pertaining to the capacity to redevelop and the capability to count on or construct shoreline armoring.This map shows the about 192 coastal bluff buildings in red, where the result of the Coastal Compensation ' s policy method would certainly be really felt most'really. Coastal bluffs in this field go through route wave assault and also coastline armoring is common. Because of the different characteristics on that part of the coastline, the exact same plans would apply in the orange area but the impact on coastal bluff residential or commercial properties would be generally much less severe. This slide is additionally implied to show that overall, compared to the numerous tens of hundreds of developable residential properties in the county, these numbers stand for a tiny fraction in a harmful location that will just end up being a lot more hazardous in the future as coastal disintegration continues as well as water level rises.And the Coastal Payment ' s plan approach is not almost growth in an unsafe location.
The aversion to new coastline'armoring as well as dependence on existing armoring is based on the recognized geologic concept that coastline armoring adds to the loss of public coastlines of all sizes. This is the severe and classic before-and-after shot of loss of beach to the coastline armoring and recovery of the beach after the armoring is eliminated. This is not meant to support for elimination of frameworks as component of the LCP Modification. It ' s just a significant illustration of the unpreventable issue with shoreline armoring on a wearing down coastline. The Region ' s proposed LCP Modification consists of maintaining existing plans concerning existing development as well as its relationship to the coastline armory. And it consists of a suite of added policies we called a hybrid approach. This consists of re-evaluation and also maintenance of existing coastline armoring to minimize effect on coastal resources. An example of this is getting rid of riprap, boulders from the beach as well as restacking them. It includes a reduction cost program, a demand that homeowner accept the dangers and also think responsibility associated to developing on an eroding shoreline, and it includes the shoreline security exception location, allowing coastline armoring along the opal high cliff ' s bluffs, continuing the pattern established by the effective county projects at Pleasure Factor as well as the Hook.However, this method has actually been overshadowed by the major policy differences on existing advancement as well as shoreline depot. During the local approval process in 2020, The majority of the
Payment personnel did send letters to both the Region Planning Commission as well as the Board of Supervisors discussing their opposition to our proposed modifications as well as their placement relating to existing development in coastline armoring. As well as their setting hasn ' t transformed. Nonetheless, County Planning Division management at the time, believed that our hybrid technique wasn ' t a reasonable compromise and as such, had an opportunity of succeeding at the Coastal Payment level. The Compensation in their taken on sea-level increase plan advice file reviewed such a hybrid method as well as the Area took that seriously. The compensation has actually continually preserved their position that these major plan considerations are non-negotiable. Their placement is substantiated by various actions on comparable LCP Changes brought ahead by various other local coastal territories as well as in conferences with a local federal government working team. If the Board selects to take out
, Region personnel is devoted to going after the clearest as well as quickest path to an LCP change that can be licensed by the Coastal Commission. There are areas where additional job with payment team may result in endanger as well as consensus. The stakeholders as well as problems are widely known and to obtain staff settlement on the concerns appears like a proper course of activity at this factor to see how we can progress. A restored neighborhood procedure on a revised LCP Change would include conferences with stakeholders, extra public hearings at the Preparation Commission and Board of Supervisors prior to a public hearing at the Coastal Payment to license a changed LCP Modification. And the goal would certainly be to obtain this performed in 2023 to synchronize with the update of the housing element due to the fact that both are associated in terms of needed timelines and updates.So, a withdrawal of the present LCP Amendment seems the only sensible path forward now. The LCP Modification includes some cutting-edge strategies to preserving seaside access while retaining the ability for bluff leading house owners to continue to safeguard their
frameworks and public infrastructure from erosion and preserving these approaches in our LCP Change is a goal.The personnel is concerned that going to the Coastal Compensation with the current strategy as well as a team report advising denial might require the payment to make an initial resolution pertaining to a few of these essential attributes such as the shoreline security exemption location based on the existing context and this might
prevent our ability to efficiently include them into a future proposition. Therefore, staff is recommending that your Board take into consideration routing team to send out a letter to the Coastal Commission taking out the Amendments, or keep the standing quo and also allow the Coastal Payment to act upon the Changes. And also that ends my staff presentation.-Thank you, Mr. Carlson and Supervisor Machado. Exist questions or remarks from participants of the Board?-Mr. Chair, if I may? -Supervisor Close friend, yeah.- Thanks, Mr.Chair, and thanks Mr. Carlson. As well as thank you, Director Machado for your introductory comments. I indicate, it ' s most likely not unusual. I ' m disappointed that these items are before us at this late of an hour, when a few years back, the Board gave direction to send this to the Commission, and now it ' s existing with really, sort of a Hobson ' s option as to what we can do below. I ' ll state to … that at the time of approval a couple of years back, I'made a remark and also making the activity that the Coastal Compensation has actually been extremely clear as well as very constant as Mr.Carlson claimed that they did not support what the Board was recommending to send out to them. That what we required was to have a decision made on our end in order to open up that discussion in certain, actually have the Compensation take activity with some sort of guidance that could be very clear to neighborhood members as well as Region personnel as to what the specifications that would certainly be accepted from the Coastal Commission would certainly be due to the fact that this has been really done at a staff degree, both at the Region as well as at the Coastal Compensation staff.I think everyone ' s working in good belief, yet there isn ' t truly a sense of, I suggest, other than us, because we in fact cast a ballot as electives, there isn ' t actually a sense of what the Commission itself assumes, just what the actual personnel thinks. Therefore, I ' m not actually helpful of the withdrawal because I feel like, at some factor, we require clarity in order to send I suggest, if it ' s rejected, it ' s refuted. I put on ' t differ that the Payment personnel is mosting likely to suggest denial in the'greatest way. They ' ve been extremely consistent by doing this. I ' m not delusional regarding that. I'do believe that we need to have that clearness though from Payment members to have an understanding regarding what it'is that they ' re trying to find due to the fact that I indicate, look, we obtained some letters of assistance for withdrawal from some community participants of my area that believe that a withdrawal means that we ' re mosting likely to finish up with a much more liberal document for homeowner. And I assume that, that is a really unlikely end result of this.I believe that the reason that Coastal Commission team is advising rejection is they think that what we ' re doing is not in conformance with the Coastal Act currently, and also what we ' re proposing, that is'as well permissive to homeowner. So I wear ' t really think that involving in added discussion is going to do something that actually brings along several of the concerned homeowner in the 2nd as well as first areas toward this. We would certainly have that … that we would in fact recognize for a reality, if this in fact went to the Commission for about. So, once again, I seem like there was a great deal of time that this could have been brought back to the Board for a discussion.So to have it be where it ' s essentially a pair of days prior to when personnel records are because of the Coastal Compensation for them to make their searchings for is, I suggest, at best, regrettable, but I imply, I truly think it requires the Board right into a choice we shouldn ' t be compelled to make in this kind of degree. There was 2 years of chance for discussion.
Those discussions really didn ' t happen, and that ' s what I ' m actually dissatisfied concerning. Yet also this Board did offer instructions to in fact send it to the Commission for a ballot, and now, it appears that that ' s actually not what'' s being suggested. Therefore, I just believe that this is mosting likely to leave us because purgatory of not actually recognizing what it is the Payment members themselves think, instead we just have what Region personnel as well as coastal personnel once again, running in excellent belief. I have no doubt on either side of that, yet there isn ' t that quality. Therefore that ' s why it ' s hard for me to sustain that initial personnel suggestion. Thank you, Mr. Chair for me revealing those thoughts.-Thank you, Manager Buddy.-I ' ll jump in here and state I agree with Manager Pal. It ' s been represented that, like, this is a negotiation yet it ' s. [chuckles] it ' s not a negotiation when one side that tells exactly just how it ' s going to be as well as, we ' re expected to come right into compliance when we passed these regulations
a number of years ago, I think all of us keep in mind that we were hammered by coastal homeowner that this was far too restrictive and also entirely undesirable what we are doing.And currently we ' re claiming it to the Coastal Payment. The Coastal Compensation says'it ' s not limiting enough. I believe we should send this to the Coastal Compensation as well as the Coastal Commission need to listen to from residential property proprietors and also there ought to be a much more clear, straight arrangement, around this issue. It doesn ' t really feel like it ' s an excellent use our time to continue to be'pilloried by both sides essentially and when we wear ' t actually have apparently the authority to find compromise or find a center ground. And after that the final point I ' ll state is, I claimed this a number of years ago however, like, this is our tactical strategy and our County values focus around equity as well as we ' ve invested a massive amount of personnel time on very costly seaside residential or commercial properties problems, as well as that comes at an expense of much less time to various other housing projects in our districts. Therefore, investing more time going back and also forth, in between these two sides, doesn ' t strike me as a topic.'We could use the moment as well as I ' d rather the Coastal Commission straight describe, what can and need to be done as well as then, and afterwards we can go from there.'-Mr. Chair.- Thank you, Manager Coonerty. Manager McPherson?-Yeah, I agree with that. That it ' s the 9th inning, or the fourth quarter, the 2-minute warning, or whatever season you ' re in yet it ' s not an excellent one for residential or commercial property proprietors, along the coastline in Santa Cruz County as well as I'actually value the Planning personnel ' s effort as well as time that ' s took into the last 2 years to try to
reach a contract with Coastal Compensation. But regardless of the great efforts, the Compensation has yet to show any versatility, that we require concerning the choices that can be offered to residential property proprietors, and I ' m open to sustaining the team referral to take out the Local Coastal Plan Amendments, as well as we really hope that our Area staff'can remain to their discussion with the Commission team and the home owners, however yeah, time is getting short, that ' s for sure.That ' s regrettable. I want the Coastal Payment would have jumped on this or responded, kindly earlier than this.-Thank you, Manager McPherson. Yeah, I imply, absolutely, [inaudible] this will certainly influence my area extremely. I think all the red residential properties revealed on that map are in the first district. Currently, I can see the reasoning in the team referral to try as well as take out to negotiate, I suggest, although it seems, as has been said, that we sanctuary ' t accomplished that over the last 2 years and also I put on ' t see just how we can get involved in a basically various type of conversation one means or another.I mean, yeah, I guess a pair of inquiries. Is there any means we can get them to, actually, like, get to some kind of a resolution previously in the year? I imply, like February or March amount of time? Exactly how do we prevent obtaining right into … if we did take out, or if it ' s heard and is rejected and after that we need to create a new application. I indicate, how do we ensure that we get there by the end of next year when we require a licensed safety and security element or for housing element? -Well, as I pointed out in the presentation, we are definitely dedicated to that time framework since it does possibly effect our housing element.So, 2023 is the time structure for getting this done, so I can assure you that the team'is dedicated ahead back with something asap, based upon our conversations with Coastal Compensation personnel. They ' ve detailed you know, they ' ve offered us a draft outline as affixed to that letter of what they assume our policy needs to include and also we would certainly use that as a basis for or building something that we believe will benefit us.-Mm-hmm. Exists any distinction in terms of application fees? I indicate, if we withdraw was there an application cost to submit this to begin with? And also we ' re going to have to have an application for'you to … -No,'there ' s no application fees. -[ clicks tongue] I imply, it ' s hard. I seem like I could sort of go regardless. I imply, somehow, we ' ve reached rest down and also discuss these products with Coastal staff. As well as I certainly see Supervisor Friend ' s argument. It would certainly be good to at the very least daytime what the real Commissioners themselves are assuming about these concerns instead of, simply keep it behind closed doors.On the various other hand, it ' s nice to be able to still keep some of the alternatives in play so to speak. I wear ' t understand what might occur to actually transform Coastal staff ' s point of view on'those different items. Allow ' s open it for public comment if there ' s no more comments or concerns. Seeing no one right here in board chambers, exists any individual online?-Yes, Chair. We do have speakers online. Brian, your microphone is now readily available.-Yes, hi.
This is Brian Peoples with Trail Currently. Of all, I suggest that you provide this discussion to the Regional Transportation Payment, that believes that they can spend construct a billion-dollar train along the seaside bluff and really are relocating forward and many of the Supervisors are preferring that. Therefore, I ' m really shocked by Supervisor Coonerty ' s comment that basically, he ' s not actually absolutely resolving fact when it pertains to purchasing the coastal hallway or investing in the coastal bluff. For our community to think that we ' re going to spend, purchase a train along the seaside bluff is exactly the reason the California Coastal Payment is pressing back on you all because you ' re not reasonable and you need to be even more realistic.And it actually injures our community due to the fact that we lose out on opportunities. Check Out Monterey County.'They simply got$25 million give for a bus manner in which goes from Marina to Sand City. In the meanwhile, we ' re spending millions for a short-term depot up by Davenport, a momentary seawall. That kind of management you can ' t go off and claim, “Well, we put on ' t recognize what to do.” No, you know what to do. As well as sadly, you ' re reluctant to route the neighborhood in the best direction.You can ' t go, and also we require you to direct the area as well as be sensible, and meet the requirements of the California Transport or Coastal Commission on what you can do on buying that coastal bluff. So, please draw back on your demand with the Coastal Compensation. Thanks.- Thanks, Mr. Peoples.- Laura, your microphone is now readily available.-Hi, great early morning. I ' m Laura Walsh with “Browse Biker Santa Cruz Region Chapters.” Talking on behalf of our thousands of participants who make use of the coastline here in Santa Cruz. The County ' s LCP update for sea degree surge actually presently places pleasure point in severe danger. This is just one of California ' s most renowned surf breaks and a coastline security exception location along Pleasure Factor as well as Opal Cliffs will shield the homes in the area, however harm the general public area that every person enjoys.Going forward with the LCP as is will shield personal property along Opal Cliffs, and also compromise the beaches as well as waves from climbing seas over the coming decades. Beaches right here are normally narrow and if we armor the coastline there, sea degree rise will at some point fulfill the sea wall surfaces, start causing backwash, and after that irreversible high trend problems in the surf in coming decades will make this area unattainable. And also the waves won ' t be trustworthy due to refraction, which we ' re all already seeing. So we do actually hope this Board reevaluates this strategy, and comes up with policies that put on ' t bargain away the all-natural seaside procedures and also recreational resources that everyone take advantage of. This is the bedrock of state legislation and we ' re not trying to work out far from it.Surf Rider wishes to be here to claim that the coastline comes from all Californians as well as not simply those fortunate adequate to own bluff top residences in this stunning area. We challenge the coastline defense exemption area, the meaning of existing growth and re-development setback calculations and also numerous bothersome policies that place public resources in risk. And we ' ve described this in a series of letters sent on September 17th of this year, April 15, 2021 as well as September 9, 2020. Thank you so much.-Thank you, Ms. Walsh.-Caller finishing in 2915, your microphone is now readily available.-Hello there, this is Becky Steinbruner. Can you hear me?-Yes, we can.-Thanks. I have actually'sent this in the on-line remark but the
recap of the LCP Modification problems as well as the withdrawal letter to the Coastal Compensation links on your internet site are damaged. I ' m unable to read them whatsoever. So, I hope that that will be repaired really quickly.I need to question this procedure. Exactly how did this fall between the fractures? And also what can we do to boost our preparation division evaluation process, so that this does not happen again? The September 9, 2020 letter from the Coastal Commission plainly described what they wanted the Region to send in location of the Amendment proposed.
13 pages, a very clearly worded referral suggested [laughes] by the Coastal Commission. Exactly how did that not come back to the Planning Payment? How did that not pertain to the Board of Supervisors? Where did it crumble? And also I identify that was all during COVID as well as a whole lot of points were upside down, but this is a really crucial problem as we ' re seeing. And currently, I check out that, it rests on having the ability to obtain$500 million well worth of cash from the seaside conservancy. So what can we do to make this far better? I wear ' t recognize if withdrawing is the most effective or if it would certainly buy us more time to attempt to discuss with the plan of the Coastal Commission and get something that will assist us get an authorized housing element by our deadline.Thank you. -Thanks, Ms. Steinbruner. -Jeffrey, your microphone ' s currently readily available. [removes throat] Jeffrey your microphone is available, I do reveal that you ' re unmuted. [take a breath] It appears we ' re having problems with this audio speaker, we ' ll return to this individual later on. Mandy, your microphone is now offered.-Hi, Mandy Outlet with the Surf Biker Structure. Hello There, Chair Koenig as well as Supervisors. If the Region moves ahead with the seaside danger update policies including the Shoreline Defense Exception Area along Enjoyment Factor and Opal Cliffs, as well as the wrong interpretation of existing advancement and various other plans that we detailed in our letter, which is in your schedule package from our legal director. [inhales] If it does move ahead, are we, beaches and waves will not stand a possibility? The waves along Enjoyment Factor deserve
doing whatever we possibly can to guarantee they ' re secured. This is one trick location where seawall exceptions ought to never be approved.
I ' m disappointed that these products are before us at this late of an hour, when a couple of years back, the Board provided instructions to send this to the Payment, as well as currently it ' s being offered with truly, kind of a Hobson ' s choice as to what we can do below. That what we required was to have actually a choice made on our end in order to open up that discussion in specific, really have the Commission take activity with some sort of support that could be really clear to area members as well as Region staff as to what the parameters that would certainly be approved from the Coastal Commission would be due to the fact that this has been truly done at a personnel degree, both at the Region and at the Coastal Compensation staff.I think everybody ' s functioning in excellent faith, yet there isn ' t really a feeling of, I imply, other than us, since we in fact cast a vote as electives, there isn ' t truly a sense of what the Payment itself believes, simply what the actual team believes. And also so, I ' m not really encouraging of the withdrawal since I really feel like, at some factor, we require clearness in order to send I suggest, if it ' s denied, it ' s denied. Those conversations truly didn ' t take place, and also that ' s what I ' m really let down about. And so, I ' m extremely surprised by Manager Coonerty ' s remark that generally, he ' s not really truly dealing with fact when it comes to investing in the seaside hallway or investing in the coastal bluff.The The Golden State Coastal Act was developed 5 decades ago to protect our public resources along the coast, and also it does this by grandfathering an existing pre-coastal act development to remain placed. If required up until the end of its helpful life, rely on seawalls. Yet it likewise necessitates that we eventually alter our pattern of development, so that new growth as well as significant remodels can no much longer be right up versus the bluff edge or coast. And it does that by developing obstacles, making sure new development does not rely upon seawalls. Santa Cruz can not have an exception. That is the bedrock of our law. The Area'' s Shoreline Security Exception Location would basically secure this pattern of development for the next century. Excuse me. This is not only unlawful, it'' s likewise dishonest. We concur with Coastal Compensation personnel that the Region'' s plan is irregular with the law.Surf Biker and also
Coastal Payment had sack, have been claiming this all along. We'' ve submitted 3 letters. We hope you'' ll work to upgrade the plans to shield our public sources, not just personal residential property, and also that you'' ll do everything you can to save our beaches and waves. Thank you a lot. – Thanks, Ms. Outlet. – Carol, your microphone is now readily available. – Hi, this is Carol Turley. It'' s my understanding that if the Commission considers this application, they can make alterations to it as well as accept it in their state. And if the Board of Supervisors doesn'' t refute that, those changes within a short amount of time, that it becomes our new local coastal program. That'' s concerning to me since a few of the important things that have been discussed earlier in this meeting that are bothersome will be compelled upon us. I believe if you put on'' t pull the application, we might be stuck with those draconian coastal commission measures.I impulse you to
take out the application as several other areas as well as cities have actually done so far. Thanks. – Calling individual 1, your microphone is currently available. – Hi, [removes throat] Marilyn Garett. I keep desiring to listen to even more of the audio speakers because I keep finding out more concerning what'' s taking place. We certainly should be securing public sources as well as not placing them in jeopardy to the priority of private rate of interests. This is under the title, Coastal Hazards Update. There are many seaside threats below. Among the ones I see additionally is fire, as well as fire vulnerable PG&E so called the clever meters that are placed on utility pole going up the coast of Freeway 1. There have been numerous fires connected with these towers and also meters. The Board has been given images and info on this. I also consider this cell tower 4G/5G constant seaside radiation on these utility poles by Verizon 4G/5G a danger to all life consisting of the coastal birds as well as bees.Serious fire problems as well as ecological dangers, getting these radiation releasing towers. In addition, I simply listened to last week that trees were virtually clear cut off of Highway 1 by fog line ranch under the high-voltage line. I assume we need to be saving the trees and also stopping fires, and not clear-cutting. Are you familiar with that? That ' s evidently–Thanks, Ms. Garett.-Sean, your microphone is currently offered. – Hi. Can you hear me? -Yes – All right. Thank you, Honorable Supervisors. My name is Sean Burns.I am birthed as well as elevated in Santa Cruz, and also a longtime
devoted surfer and frequenter of Satisfaction Factor of as well as exclusive surf breaks. I ' m below in support of Save The Waves provision, a neighborhood non-profit organization dedicated to protecting browse environments around the globe and more particularly right here at the Santa Cruz world collection. Opal Cliff ' s area is partially Santa Cruz ' s world surfing book, which is marked over ten years ago, by the Save The Waves union. This world surfing reserve does not currently have any legal designation of security. It is a commitment of the community of Santa Cruz led by local stewardship council which includes surfers, researchers, policymakers, along with all the individuals who take pleasure in the incredible coast of Santa Cruz to secure our coastal resources from dangers, that effect the waves as well as atmosphere. Save the Waves coalition and also the Globe Surfing Reserves is concerned about the Santa Cruz Area Local Coastal Program Change as it lacks any type of boost defense for the browse breaks while permitting boosted and or prolonged duration of existing shoreline arm array. Enhanced extends and also life-spans of aquatic or postal frameworks created considerable changes to the coast and also have the potential to adversely impact the coastal procedures, accessibility, as well as surf breaks.Save the Waves believes together with the Santa Cruz Globe Searching Book that even more community engagement is necessary for bringing a need of the Coastal Commission. And also more interest and
conversation have to be offered to the pertinent effect on coastal sources and browse breaks. Conserve the Waves as well as the World Browsing Reserve can use appropriate outreach platform for reviewing this important LCP Change with the regional neighborhood and making certain a remedies to coastal erosion, think about the pertinent impacts of browse breaks, and coastal features of the Santa Cruz World Searching Reserve. Thanks.-Thank you, Mr. Burns.-Chair, if you put on ' t mind, we ' ll circle around to the caller that was having troubles earlier. Jeffrey R, if you ' d like to speak, please increase your hand. Chair, the
customer has actually not increased their hand. I think they do'not want to'speak right now. -Okay. I will additionally return to the Board for deliberation as well as action. -Well, Mr. Chair allow me to say that I concur with your assessment concerning going in either case. I mean, the factor I feel the method I do is simply to provide some kind of finality, but also for individuals that are asking to take out to several of that is a legitimate method as well as I agree that team wants to operate in excellent belief with the Coastal Payment. I imply, in concerns to Ms. Turley ' s remarks, there is no wish and it ' s been made clear by the Coastal Commission in their letters.They ' re not mosting likely to suggest any type of alterations at a Coastal Compensation meeting because they really feel that what we brought onward remains in offense of the Coastal Act. Therefore, there isn ' t actually a flexible paper but once again,
without listening to the actual commissioners himself. I likewise understand what Supervisor McPherson ' s stating concerning a chance for a reset. It wasn ' t said precisely that way. I ' m not adamantly opposed to the concept of withdrawal. I just wear ' t believe that anything ' s mosting likely to considerably alter as well as I believe that when you have like ecological organizations and home civil liberties companies coming ahead asking you take out since they both think that they ' re gon na get better components of what they ' re requesting, then you acknowledge that no person actually knows what ' s concerning to come down the pike.And so, I believe what ' s gon na come down the pike is, not something that I indicate, well, I put on ' t know. However I ' m open for ongoing conversation on this and like'I said, I ' m going to sustain sending it to the Compensation yet I understand there ' s a board bulk
that wants to withdraw'. I mean, I ' m not married to what I ' m claiming. I'' m just sitting with the critical viewpoint. It makes one of the most feeling to have the Commission in fact go on the record with where they depend on something.-Thank you. [removes throat]-Yeah, I'' ll make the exact same comment, as well as argue that it really would be a lot more effective for the Coastal Compensation to explain exposition and progress, instead of individuals have a perception that the Region has a whole lot of freedom in this as well as can satisfy the needs of the opposing sides in this.It ' s ultimately not our decision, but individuals are coming to our conferences wanting us to evaluate in and also be much better for that to occur in a public transparent method than us doing shuttle bus settlements to and fro, when we don ' t'actually have the authority to set policy and mix. -Thanks, Manager Coonerty. I mean, I presume I would certainly ask personnel, exists anything that would certainly be substantive? Is there anything either happening out there in the basic argument? I indicate, whether it ' s a legal action or the status of other LCP ' s submitted by various other locations that went to basically alter this conversation anyway over the next year? As well as are we truly from your viewpoint, much better or even worse circumstance withdrawing versus you understand, have essentially having a denial on our hands?-Well, I assume the message that we ' re attempting to communicate from these personnels ' point of view is remaining in a favorable position on this with the Shore Payment team, as well as not intending to see that come to be negative with the Coastal Payment Activity that rejects it.I mean, that ' s kind of the basis for our recommendation. I ' m not knowledgeable about truly any kind of significant task or progression on these basic problems when it come to various other regional territories that have withdrawn their applications. There are currently lawsuits.
I know that there is a claim pending today on this meaning of existing advancement as the subject yet I mean, I ' m no specialist, it ' s at the test level now so for the time to solve that is probably considerable, longer than a year, I would state in my experience. [breathes in] That ' s among the important things, so, I don ' t assume we ' re visiting any kind of significant movement in the placements of either side and also over the following year.Mm-hmm. No. So, especially the Coastal Compensation, I indicate, they ' ve been really clear on'this, and it'' s immovable on these standard policy problems. -Okay, thanks. [inhales]
Manager McPherson.-I don ' t believe Manager Coonerty second this acts motion. I will do that. I ' m just … -I didn ' t make a movement in fact. Sorry, sorry. [chuckles] [crosstalk] [inaudible] – Well, allow me simply ask a concern that, before that.I ' m simply a little concerned that the coastal could needs something much more restrictive. And I wear ' t recognize how they could obtaining their conversation however … -I think that there ' s some areas where we can bargain. I'' ll simply offer you one example of the interpretation of re-development. Having to show all of the job that ' s been done on a residence, going back to 1977 is not feasible in this County. [chuckles] We don ' t have the documents to do that precisely as well as relatively. So we need ahead to a few other … We need to'discuss that. I mean, we can ' t agree to something that ' s essentially impossible for us to do.'There ' s just one instance where we think we can discuss with Coastal Payment staff to come up with something that could be practical for us based on our documents.-Thank you.-I indicate, proceed, Supervisor Coonerty.- Yeah. I mean, for the purpose of moving points along right here. I ' ll move that we send our application to the Coastal Compensation.-And I ' ll 2nd, and also as I said, I can see either disagreement, therefore the Board bulk intends to go the other means as well as withdraw the application. And also recognizing this timeline in the idea of keeping relationships with Coastal. I'actually totally can see that part. I assume we would certainly just, we ' ll have that absence of information concerning what the actual Commission members themselves believe. Yet you understand, this is really just a judgment phone call, as well as I don ' t believe there ' s in fact a right answer, rather truthfully, however that ' s why I ' m seconding this movement, yet I can recognize why somebody would sustain the general personnel suggestion. -All. So, we have a movement by Supervisor Coonerty as well as 2nd by Manager Friend.Any additionally conversation? [faint'] -I mean, there ' s no extra activities? There ' s no substitute activities? – No. -No.- Okay. -All right, seeing none, clerk, roll call that please.
-Supervisor Friend? -Aye. -Coonerty? – Aye.-Caput?-Aye.-McPherson.-Aye.- And also Koenig? -Aye.'- Item passes with one voice. – All. Thank you everybody. We ' ll currently continue with thing 10. To take into consideration approval as well as principle of an ordinance repealing and changing chapter 8.43 of the Santa Cruz Region Code pertaining to tenant securities against revenge and harassment [inhales] routine second analysis, and final fostering of the statute on October 18th, 2022, as well as guide the County Communications Supervisor to distribute a press and create release as well as lessee civil liberties flyer in English as well as Spanish to disperse with the counties media and area dealing with networks of communication as described in the memorandum of Manager Koenig as well as Supervisor Caput. I believe we have any kind of staff discussion on this. As well as I ' ll simply claim, obviously, we ' ve had a durable discussion on this product at our last conference. [inhales] The statute that ' s been reminded us, I think shows the issues of both the lessee area along with the property neighborhood. And, I assume that [inaudible]
is it fair compromise? I think that'the occupants ' rights flyer, we ' ll make certain the area does our part as far as making certain every person comprehends the law and their ability to use it on either side. Exists any kind of remarks or concerns from Board members?-' Yeah, Mr. Chair. I thanks and also Supervisor Caput for bringing this. I think the largest instant thing we can do about our homeless housing crisis is not to allow more people get [inhales] become homeless. And I think, we require to sustain both the renters and homeowner in maintaining people in their systems to the best degree possible. And also I think this is an action towards that end, so congratulations. I assume this is a great move. I ' ll action, make the motion that we accept their suggest the actions.- If you just hang on a minute. Thank you for your remarks. We intend to ensure we take public remark before a motion. Any various other remarks or questions from the board participants? Seeing none,
exists anybody from the public that desires to resolve us on this product? There ' s no one below in chambers. Is there anybody on Zoom? -Yes, Chair. We do have a speaker online.Barbara, your microphone is now offered.-Yes, thank you. Barbara Meister, Leader at Holy Cross Catholic Church as well as COPA. And also I wan na say thanks to Manager Koenig for taking the lead to actually rejuvenate the Area Statute to protect occupants from harassment and also revenge. COPA ' s listened to thousands of stories of the stress that tenants are facing as well as this regulation is a very important initial action. And again, I thank you all. To Senator McPherson ' s aim that I was shocked to check out in the Sentinel, the Area ' s homeless count as well as thorough study report data. It truly emphasizes the requirement for higher efforts to keep our lessees housed. The survey located that the leading reason for homelessness was expulsion. 39%of those evaluated had formerly been housed as well as were evicted. Therefore, COPA wants to proceed to strategizing with you about added steps we can take to protect against evictions from taking place to begin with as well as maintain family members in their houses. And last week, yes, we had a durable conversation and also you listened to tales from COPA leaders regarding the high degree of worry that renters have towards their landlords, so much to ensure that they endure mistreatment, as well as typically are terrified to stand as well as assert their rights.So this side proposal for a solid communications plan is necessary to both inform lessees concerning their civil liberties, but also to inform property managers to support the regulation. For instance, it is unlawful to victimize Section 8 vouchers, Elizabeth Cruz was preparing to be below with us to testify and also share how when she sought locations, it was constantly out. There were lots of advertisements saying Area 8, need
not apply.Well, that is not the law so this suggestion of a durable interaction will truly serve. As well as I motivate you as well, Region personnel to assemble a conference of the community-based companies that are entailed in eviction avoidance, as well as additionally that are giving rental assistance to co-design this communication plan as well as products to ensure that the information is exact as well as appropriate, and also plainly connected in modern technology or
terminology that any type of lessee can understand. And additionally to ensure that people recognize where to choose support. Once again, COPA appreciates your management. We stand all set to continue to plan on even more remedies. Thank you.-Thanks, Ms. Meister. -Caller finishing in 1705, your microphone is now available. -Hello, Board. Can you hear me? -Yes.-Great. This is Eric Robert. Thank you for taking my comments.I desire to say thanks to Chair Koenig as well as the rest of the Board for paying attention to my concerns recently, and also obtaining that Area D that we had worries concerning. As well as I fully sustain the thing as you ' ve changed it. I agree, it ' s crucial to secure prone lessees from abusive actions. I wear ' t believe it takes place that frequently. Even one event of such misuse is reprehensible, and we should do everything we can to stop it. Also, I did send a letter expressing my thanks and also assistance, and also it doesn ' t seem to have actually jumped on to the package. I submitted in time. And also I ' m specific that several others did, so', I put on ' t understand what happened with those letters.But I did confirm with the staff ' s office the other day that they were received. So [ gets rid of throat] whatever blooper occurred if those that enter into the record due to the fact that I do intend to share my support for the Board, for taking this action and also for hearing our issues'. Thank you very much once again. – Thank you. -Caller 2915, your microphone is now offered.-It ' s Becky Steinbruner, can you hear me?-Yes.
-Thanks. I also sustain safeguarding the susceptible people who are leasing their real estate. I likewise intend to respect the legal rights of the property owners, when there really truly is a trouble with a lessee. Because there are tenants in them that are unsafe, I have close friends that have themselves self forced out from real estate facilities. And the property owner has no capability to address them venturing out. [chuckles] So, what can we do to also protect the proprietor ' s capability, as well as therefore, the safety as well as health of others who are renting? When there are these issue occupants, medicine handling, residential physical violence, hooking, it is all taking place as well as a great deal of it in some of the economical housing complicateds that I ' m mindful of in Live Oak. So, I want to have someplace that landlords have the ability to appeal any type of choice, and how will this new regulation be enforced and monitored for its performance? Thank you.-Thank you, Ms. Steinbruner'. -We have no more audio speakers for this item, Chair.-Currently, I ' ll go back to the Board for activity and deliberation.We have motion from Manager McPherson.- Yeah, Mr. Chair, I ' ll second it. Let me likewise just guarantee that previous caller, that we did get those letters. They really were submitted to us from the Board of Supervisors. They may not have actually made it in the packet, but we absolutely did get that package of assistance letters. I want him to be guaranteed of that. – Great, thank you. Movement by Manager McPherson, 2nd by Manager Good friend. Any additional conversation? Seeing none, roll telephone call that, please.
-Manager Buddy?- Aye.-Coonerty? – Aye. -Caput?'-Aye. -McPherson? -Aye.-And Koenig?-Aye.-Item passes unanimously.-Thank you, then we ' ll now move to Thing 31, which was removed from the approval agenda to the routine agenda, which is to take on resolution approving an expected profits of 10,660,000 from the California Department of Real Estate and also Area Growth for Job Homekey Park Haven Plaza. License the execution for Area Product Contract with 2838 Park Avenue LP regarding services as well as FPI Building Management, track the Human Provider Department to return on or before November 15, 2022, to validate the arrangements and take relevant actions as advised by the Director of Human Services.And on this thing, we have our Director of Housing for Wellness, Dr. Ratner.- Hi. Thank you for considering this item and also I ' m pleased to answer any type of inquiries that the Board may have pertaining to the suggested activities. This is a follow-up to the discussion that our department provided to the Board in our real estate for a healthy and balanced Santa Cruz update, our 6-month update.And throughout that discussion, we stated we had sent 4 applications for Homekey awards and received notice that 2 of the tasks had gotten a statement from HCD that they were granted funds. This is just one of those 2 tasks. The various other task is the Veterans Village Job in Ben Lomond. And also both of these jobs take place to be in unincorporated areas of the Region. And safeguarding of these funds aids the Board as well as the community attain one of our specified objectives which is to increase the variety of supportive housing and also housing tasks in unincorporated locations of the county. [breathes in] The particular project fits before you, was
initially offered back in January with a request to request financing for the project. And also the state introduced that the task got a financing award in June. As well as we ' ve lastly gotten documentation back from the state around the basic contract and the buck quantity. So the activities prior to you today are to enable us as team to collaborate with the state as [ faint] division people and also perform the arrangement and also bring the funds in to support the projects.Just a quick overview on the job as well as after that I ' m delighted to respond to inquiries. It ' s a 36-unit development and it ' s going to be developed with modular building. The address of the job is 2838 Park Opportunity, extremely near Cabrillo. And also it ' s a novel task for producing more licenses for housing and also that it ' s modular building as well as the closeness to the area college, is unique statewide. There are 3 main target populaces that we ' re gon na be serving there. Among the professionals experiencing being homeless. And at our last upgrade, we show the Board that there ' s some worrying information that the variety of professionals in the county experiencing being homeless has actually risen to 17 devices.
As well as the project will certainly be for professionals, 14 for young people, that ' ve remained in the foster care system, either homeless or at threat of being homeless', as well as 4 for households plus one property manager unit. The housing authority of the area sustains the job as an invested, supportive, rental subsidies to connect with the structure. As well as the approval of the Board for the job will aid it to relocate ahead. On the whole, the growth ' s estimated expenses around 20 millions.
I indicate, in regards to Ms. Turley ' s comments, there is no need and it ' s been made clear by the Coastal Payment in their letters.They ' re not going to recommend any adjustments at a Coastal Commission meeting due to the fact that they really feel that what we brought forward is in offense of the Coastal Act. I simply put on ' t think that anything ' s going to significantly change and I believe that when you have like ecological organizations and also residential or commercial property legal rights organizations coming forward asking you take out due to the fact that they both think that they ' re gon na get better components of what they ' re asking for, then you acknowledge that no one actually understands what ' s about to come down the pike.And so, I assume what ' s gon na come down the pike is, not something that I suggest, well, I don ' t know.-Well, I assume the message that we ' re attempting to share from these teams ' perspective is staying in a positive position on this with the Coastline Compensation team, as well as not desiring to see that ended up being adverse with the Coastal Commission Activity that refutes it.I mean, that ' s kind of the basis for our referral. That ' s one of the things, so, I don ' t believe we ' re going to see any type of kind of substantial motion in the placements of either side and over the next year.Mm-hmm. You understand, this is really simply a judgment call, and I don ' t believe there ' s really an ideal answer, quite honestly, but that ' s why I ' m seconding this activity, but I can comprehend why somebody would support the general team recommendation.I think it ' s crucial to keep in mind that the Professional ' s Village Job which is the Second task that was likewise awarded Homekey funding was approved on consent. Locals will certainly profit from all of the services readily available to professionals and families at Cabrillo College.I ' ve had the satisfaction of growing up in Santa Cruz and also I went to Harbor High College and also it ' s just an honor to be able to come back to the area I expanded up in, and provide back and develop a long-term encouraging housing. The following regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors will be October 18th, at 9 A.M., and we ' ll now move to shut session.It is 12:40 right now, so, we ' ll convene at 12:55.
And also then we additionally, in our workplace, have a newsletter that we send out with around 900 clients to allow individuals understand what'' s happening with some of the work of the real estate for Health Office. I assume it ' s important to note that the Professional ' s Town Project which is the 2nd job that was likewise granted Homekey financing was approved on consent. Homeowners will certainly benefit from all of the services offered to experts and also family members at Cabrillo College.I ' ve had the satisfaction of expanding up in Santa Cruz and I went to Harbor High College and also it ' s simply an honor to be able to come back to the community I expanded up in, and also offer back and build a long-term helpful real estate. -'Mr. Chair, we did received a whole lot of letters, so I ' m a little bit stunned that individuals didn ' t come to talk today.But, I do recognize the importance of this as well as I actually value the job of Dr. Ratner. The next routine meeting of the Board of Supervisors will certainly be October 18th, at 9 A.M., and also we ' ll currently move to shut session.It is 12:40 right now, so, we ' ll assemble at 12:55.