YYCCC 2011-03-07 Calgary City Council – Video Archive – March 7, 2011 – Secondary Suites

Hi there I'' m Gord,
developer of child UI application. apple iphone/ iPAD/ iPOD application for BABIES! I was looking for an app suitable for my boy. The trouble is most iPhone apps call for option
of menu choices to correctly utilize the app. With Baby UI application, you revolve the tool
to alter settings instead. He might not purposely rotate the tool
in the beginning, but he'' ll come across it conveniently. It will certainly reply to shake, react to touch. If the apple iphone is face-down, it makes sounds.He selects it

as much as examine and also he'' s. engaging with the iPhone once more. I'' ve obtained a variation for iPad as a native app. There'' s no details buttons, no advertising and marketing. It is just purely Child Interface,.
nothing more. Aaaaaaagggggghhhhhhhaaaaaa! I'' ll get that back to you in just a sec. I'' m structure fragment systems for child UI.
included as complimentary updates up until my boy is old sufficient that he has various other iPhone applications that catch his.
interest. State “” bye-bye”” to the wonderful people! They'' re much more likely to buy the app.
, if you act cute.. Offer them a wave.GOOD early morning, EVERYBODY. I FEEL LIKE WE SANCTUARY ' T BEEN. TOGETHER IN A VERY LONG TIME
. I ' M EXTREMELY DELIGHTED TO BE DANGLING.
OUT WITH YOU ALL ONCE MORE. WE'' RE GOING TO BEGIN THIS
. MORNING WITH A SPECIAL.
DISCUSSION AND RECOGNITION AS WELL AS LIKE TO INVITE GM LOGAN TO TALK.
TO US ABOUT THE UNITED WAY.
>> > > GOOD EARLY MORNING, YOUR PRAYER. AND ALSO FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE.
THAT AREN'' T AWARE OF ME
, I ' M. THE GENERAL SUPERVISOR OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE CITY. MAYOR NENSHI, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.
AS WELL AS ATTENDEES, IT'' S MY EXCELLENT ENJOYMENT TODAY TO SHOW TO YOU.
SOME EXCELLENT NEWS CONCERNING THE END OF.
OUR 2010 UNITED MEANS PROJECT. AS YOU UNDERSTAND, UNITED METHOD IS THE.
CITY OF CALGARY'' S CHARITY OF.
OPTION AS WELL AS WE GARNER TREMENDOUS SUPPORT FOR THE UNITED MEANS.
THROUGH STAFF MEMBERS OF THE CITY OF.
CALGARY. HEADING INTO IN 2015'' S. PROJECT, WE WEREN ' T QUITE SURE.
WHAT TO ANTICIPATE. WE WERE IN THIS– ABOUT THE.
3RD YEAR OF AN ECONOMIC.
SLUMP. WE NEEDED TO REASSESS THE MEANS.
THAT WE WERE TAKING ON UNITED METHOD.
PROJECT. AND ALSO WE ALSO UNDERSTOOD THAT THERE WAS.
MORE REQUIREMENT FOR OUR SUPPORT THAN.
EVER. SO RETAINING THAT IN MIND, WE SET.
OUR TARGET AT $375.000 FOR THE.
2010 CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD BE DUPLICATING THE PRIOR YEAR'' S. CAMPAIGN. WE RETURNED TO OUR TRIED AND ALSO REAL CORPORATE FUNDRAISING.
METHODS. ANCHORING OUR CAMPAIGN WAS OUR CORPORATE CONTRIBUTIONS THROUGH OUR.
PAY-ROLL REDUCTIONS OR THROUGH.
DESIGNATED DONATIONS FROM STAFF MEMBERS AT THE CITY OF.
CALGARY. AND WHAT WE GOT OUT OF THAT PROJECT THIS YEAR WAS AN.
BOOSTED QUANTITY, NOT ONLY IN.
TOTAL DONATIONS BUT IN– AN BOOST IN THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS.
THAT HAVE CONTRIBUTED GREATER THAN A.
THOUSAND DOLLARS PER PERSON.IT ' S QUITE

AMAZING IF YOU SEE.
THE NUMBER OF CITY PERSONNEL DO THAT. WE HAD A VARIETY OF OTHER EFFORTS. WE STARTED LAST SPRING WITH.
OUR CITIES MIN TO WIN IT WHICH WAS A LITTLE OF.
FUNDRAISING AS WELL AS.
FUNDRAISING AS WELL AS WE TOOK PLACE TO AMONG OUR MAJOR PROJECTS WHICH.
IS THE BLOSSOM DAY. YOU MAY JOIN THE FLOWER DAY WITH YOUR TEAM AND.
BUY FLOWERS FOR CHOCOLATE OR.
REAL CHOCOLATE. THIS YEAR WE EXTENDED IT TO THE.
DISHES ON WHEELS. AND ALSO 550 CITY TEAM PARTICIPANTS GOT BLOSSOMS FOR ANONYMOUS.
I THOUGHT THAT WAS A REALLY GREAT THING WE'' VE DONE THIS YEAR. OF FOR THE LAST FEW YEARS WE'' VE.
RECENTLY TO ABOUT $7,500 WHICH WAS A NEW DEGREE FOR United States. WE DO AN ON-LINE SILENT AUCTION. WE'' VE HAD GOLF COMPETITIONS. IT'' S REALLY BEEN A TREMENDOUS. PROJECT AND ALSO WE DO HAVE A WHOLE LOT OF. SUCCESS AND ALSO A GREAT DEAL OF INVOLVEMENT. OVERALL, WE REACH OVER 17.000. TEAM MEMBER IN ABOUT A HUNDRED VARIOUS LOCATIONS AROUND THE. CITY OF CALGARY. AND ALSO WE CERTAINLY GET THE MESSAGE BENT ON EVERY TEAM
AND ALSO WE. MOTIVATE PEOPLE TO PARTICIPATE.
IF FOR THE THROUGH A DONATION THROUGH GETTING INVOLVED IN ONE OF.
OUR OCCASIONS. WE HAD A GREAT DEAL OF OTHER FUN DETAILS TO DO LIKE PAPER PLANE TRAVELING.
IF, contests INSIDE THE ROOM.
YOU WERE HERE THAT DAY.WE HAD OUR FIRST ANNUAL ARTISANS.
AUCTION. BAKE BUSINESS, PUBLICATION BUSINESS, PRECIOUS JEWELRY BUSINESS, ALL TYPES OF OTHER MATTERS.
IN VARIOUS BUSINESS DEVICES. LOADS AND ALSO DOZENS OF OCCASIONS ACROSS VARIOUS AREAS AROUND.
THE CITY. WE ATTEMPTED SOME NEW THINGS LIKE BUSKING FOR BUCKS. WE HAD A BAND NIGHT WHERE SOME.
FOLKS IN THE AREA ORIENTED DEVICES PLACE ON A SPECIAL NIGHT.
WITH 3 BANDS. AND FUNDED THE CONSERVE A KIDS LOCATION. IT'' S WONDERFUL TO HAVE UNITED WAY.
OCCASIONS THAT ARE TARGETED IN THE DIRECTION OF DETAILS CHARITIES, NOT SIMPLY.
TOWARDS THE GENERAL GENERAL.
FUND.SO THE OVERALL COLLABORATIVE. INITIATIVES HAVE MANAGED
TO ELEVATE. OVER $438.000.
AND ALSO THE INTEREST THAT WAS.
VISUALIZED BY THE GROUP WAS ACTUALLY.
TREMENDOUS AND I'' D LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE A FEW OF THE INDIVIDUALS. THAT CONTRIBUTED IN MAKING.
THIS A SUCCESS. OFF JASON MAYER. HE LED OUR CAMPAIGN. HE WAS SECONDED FROM ROADWAYS FOR THE YEAR. TRANSPORT IS LEADING THE.
PROGRAM FOR TWO YEARS, AND ALSO WE SECOND An EMPLOYEE TO LEAD.
JASON WAS THIS YEAR'' S. NEXT YEAR IT ' S GOING TO AN. INDIVIDUAL IN CALGARY TRANSPORTATION.
STAND UP WHO ARE HERE PRESENT TO BE ACKNOWLEDGED.
[Applause] MANY THANKS, JASON. I'' D ALSO LIKE TO THANK OWEN. TOLBERT FOR HIS RECURRING SUPPORT. AND ALL MEMBERS FOR THEIR ONGOING ASSISTANCE AS WELL AS PUT OUT A.
PUT TO ALL THE INDIVIDUAL.

SPONSORS AND ALSO SPECIFIC VOLUNTEERS THAT MAKE EACH EVENT.
COME OFF EFFECTIVELY. AS WE ARE ALL CITY CIVIL CIVI SE TAKE SATISFACTION IN DOING WONDERFUL THINGS.
FOR THE CITY OF CALGARY. THE UNITED MEANS CAMPAIGN DEMONSTRATES JUST HOW MUCH CITY.
WORKERS TREATMENT ABOUT THE CITY.
THEY HELP AS WELL AS OPERATE IN AND STAY IN. SO I'' D CURRENTLY LIKE TO INVITE THE.
ADHERING TO PEOPLE UP FOR THE CHEQUE PRESENTATION. MAYOR NENSHI, OWEN TOLBERT AND.
THE CALGARY CHAIR OF UNITED MEANS RUTH RAMSDEN TIMBER AS WELL AS OUR.
CAMPAIGN LEAD JASON ADVANTAGE.
[Faint] [Praise]>> > > THANK YOU ALL. THANKS SPECIFICALLY TO OUR 40 PLANNERS WHO ARE
. ACTIVELY STIMULATED IN THIS.
CAMPAIGN.BUT THIS IS ALL

CONCERNING STRUCTURE A. GREAT CITY TOGETHER. ARE RELOCATING INDIVIDUALS OUT OF DESTITUTION, STRUCTURE STRONG.
WITH EACH OTHER WITH CITY OF CALGARY WORKERS. AND WE ' RE THRILLED THAT THEY.
PROVIDING BACK TO OUR COMMUNITY. AS WELL AS STRUCTURE A CITY WITH EVERYBODY. AND ALSO THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR.
PARTICIPATION, TO THE MAYOR FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP AND ALSO THANKS.
FOR YOUR INVOLVEMENT. OURVE BEEN A PARTICIPANT OF CAMPAIGN CABINET THIS YEAR. YOU'' VE GONE
WELL ABOVE AS WELL AS. PAST YOUR NORMAL TRAINING COURSES OF DUTIES TO BE INVOLVED IN A THE.
NEIGHBORHOOD DIFFERENTLY. THANK YOU EXTREMELY MUCH FOR THAT. THANKS.
ALLOW ME ADD MY PERMANEN PERSONALO THE CITY OF CALGARY STAFF MEMBERS.
THAT WORKED SO HARD TO MAKE THIS.
A CAMPAIGN SUCH A SUCCESS. GOING ON TO THE PROGRAM, THEN. ON CONCERN PERIOD, ALDERMAN.
JONES. >> > > I PUT ON ' T KNOW WHO THE CONCERN. IS FOR BUT A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO. I ASKED A CONCERN IN REGARDS TO ALLOWING CELL TOWERS ON MR WEBSITES.
AND SPECIFICALLY NEIGHBORHOOD SITES.
COMMUNITIES COULD GET THE BENEFIT OF THE MONEY. EVER SINCE, I'' VE GONE THROUGH. PEOPLE IN PARKS AS WELL AS RECREATION, GONE THROUGH PEOPLE IN PLANNING,.
GONE THROUGH PEOPLE IN.
TRANSPORT. I'' VE GONE THROUGH INDIVIDUALS IN LEGISLATION. AND ALSO NOW I'' VE
HEARD IT ' S. CORPORATE QUALITIES ISSUE. ARE WE GOING TO COORDINATE A. RESPONSE AT SOME TIME SOON SO I.
CAN DISCOVER WHETHER I NEED TO DO A NOTIFICATION OF MOVEMENT OR IS IT.

GOING TO FIND FORWARD WITH.
AMONG THE DEPARTMENTS I JUST MENTIONED?
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
Mr. WATSON IS VOLUNTEERING TO SOLUTION THE QUESTION.
>> > > I AM VOLUNTEERING TO SOLUTION.
THE CONCERN AND ALSO TRY TO WORK WITH ALL THESE THINGS. YOU'' RE DEAD-ON. THERE'' S A VARIETIES OF PLAYERS.WE ARE CREATING A REPORT, AND IT.
SLIDES MY MIND, BUT I RECOGNIZE IT'' S. COMING BACK IN THE FIRST HALF OF THIS YEAR, COMING OUT OF THE.
LAST COUNCIL CONVERSATION ON THIS. WHICH WILL CERTAINLY BELONG TO THAT REPORT.
>> > > ARE WE ALSO GOING TO CHECK OUT.
THE FACT THAT THERE'' S REGARDING 400 OF THESE YET TO COME AS WELL AS ALL. WE ' RE DOING TODAY IS.
ANNOYING A GREAT DEAL OF INDIVIDUALS BY SETTING THEM BEHIND THEIR FENCE? WE'' RE CERTAINLY ANNOYING A WHOLE LOT.
OF INDIVIDUALS, I CERTAINLY HEAR ABOUT IT. ALDERMAN JONES, AS I'' M CERTAIN
YOU. KNOW WE HAVE EXTREMELY LITTLE POWER ON THIS WHOLE DATA AND I TIN.
TAKE A LOOK AROUND THE TABLE, ALMOST.
ALL OF YOU HAVE PROBLEMS WITH CELLPHONES IN YOUR WARD.
SOMEWHERE. AS WELL AS, YOU'' RE RIGHT, IF WE CAN RELOCATION THEM ALL TO MR THAT WOULD.
BE ONE POINT, BUT THERE ARE.
CHALLENGES DOING THAT. WE'' LL BRING IT ALL BACK AND ALSO LET. COUNCIL MAKE SOME VERSIONS.
>> > > IT WILL GO THROUGH LAND USE? >> > > IT WILL COME THROUGH LPT.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU, ALDERMAN JONES.ON QUESTION DURATION, ALDERMAN. CHABOT? > > MANY THANKS.
I ASSUME THIS WOULD BE FOR. I WAS TALKING TO A LOCAL JUST RECENTLY CONCERNING An ITEM THAT.
ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY AND OFFER MAYBE SOME ALLEVIATION TO. A FEW OF THE CALGARIANS IN.
PERTAINS TO TO TRACTION CONTROL.
THIS PRODUCT CALLED ECOTRACK. IF YOU WERE, I WAS WONDERING. FAMILIAR WITH IT AS WELL AS WHETHER OR NOT WE
HAD CONSIDERED USING IT. APPARENTLY REALLY ECOLOGICALLY. FRIENDLY I AND ALSO DOES SUPPLY SUBSTANTIAL GRIP IMPROVEMENT. TO THE ROADWAYS DURING SNOW EVENTS.
> > YOUR PRAISE, I ' M NOT KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THAT PARTICULAR. TRADEMARK NAME. I ' D WELCOME DETAILS ON
IT OR IF SOMEBODY INTENDED TO CALL. OUR OFFICE OR RYAN JESTIN THE. SUPERVISOR OF ROADS TO SPEAK ABOUT THIS SPECIFIC PRODUCT. I ' VE HEARD WONDER MELT, A. NUMBER OF VARIOUS POINTS THAT HAVE BEEN– THAT HAVE
DIFFERENT. CHEMICAL FEATURES THAT HAVE A. LOWER MELTING FACTOR. > > APPARENTLY THIS WAS IN CITY. >> NEWSPAPER ON THE 28th.
FEBRUARY.
APPARENTLY THERE'' S An INTERNET SITE. IF YOU COULD PERHAPS, AVAILABLE.
EXPLORE THAT, Mr.LOGAN, I '

D APPRECIATE IT.
>> > > ECOTRACK>>? > > ECOTRACK. THANKS, YOUR PRAISE.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN CHABOT. ANY PERSON ELSE ON INQUIRY PERIOD. I'' LL TAKE An ACTIVITY TO AUTHORIZE. THE PROGRAM. MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN MAR. DO I HAVE A SECONDER? THANKS, ALDERMAN STEVENSON. ON THE PROGRAM ALDERMAN CHABOT>. > > MANY THANKS, YOUR PRAISE. WELL, A NUMBER OF DETAILS.
FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO.
ASK YOU TO ADVANCE AND. HANDLE CPC 2011-27 BEFORE MANAGING CPC 2011-001 AND ALSO.
THAT'' S A LAND USE BYLAW. AMENDMENT FOR THE SIGNS.
I THINK WE SHOULD MOST LIKELY BARGAIN.
WITH THAT PRIOR TO MANAGING. THE CERTAIN INDICATOR. AND PROBABLY HAVE A NUMBER OF IN.
ELECTRONIC CAMERA THINGS THAT REQUIRED TO BE.
ADDED. I'' M NOT SURE IF THE CHAIR OF.
PLAN IT WISHED TO RELOCATE THE.
ADDITION OF THOSE. I BELIEVE THAT'' S IMMEDIATE. COMPANY, THAT? >> IS THAT CORRECT? > > YOUR PRAYER, THERE ARE
3. PRODUCTS CURRENTLY PROVIDED IN THE IN.
CAM ITEMS.LAS 2011-04, 05

, 066 ARE ALREADY.
ON THE SCHEDULE.
>> > > THERE ARE NO ADDED ONES? >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: HAVE I.
AN ADDITIONAL IN CA CAM PRODUCT.
>> > > HAVE I NOTHING ELSE AMENDMENTS TO PROPOSE AT THIS POINT.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: DO I.
HAVE A SECONDER FOR THOSE? MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN DEMONG. ARE WE AGREED? I BELIEVE WE'' VE GOT A COUPLE EVEN MORE– I'' LL TAKE A MOVEMENT TO.
ADD A PAIR MORE IMMEDIATE.
SERVICE PRODUCTS. THERE IS THE IMMEDIATE COMPANY.
AS WELL AS ONE MORE IN CAMERA URGENT. SERVICE ON THE AIRPORT TERMINAL TUNNEL.CAN I HAVE A MOVEMENT TO ADD.
THOSE? THANKS, ALDERMAN STEVENSON. DO I HAVE A SECONDER? MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN HODGES. AS WELL AS ALDERMAN FARRELL WILL CERTAINLY SECOND. ALL. SO ON THOSE AFTER THAT ARE WE CONCURRED? ANY OPPOSED? CARRIED. ANYTHING ELSE. ON THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE AGENDA.
ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? LUGGED. ALL RIGHT. VERIFICATION OF THE MINUTES. CANISTER I HAVE An ACTIVITY TO APPROVE.
THESE THREE COLLECTIONS OF MINS,.
MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN JONES. SECONDED ALDERMAN MacLEOD. JUST A COUPLE.ON THE FIRST SET OF MINUTES,.
PAGE 18 OF 50, ALTHOUGH IT MAY.
BE A SMALL CHANGE, TYPICALLY ON THIRST READING AUTHORIZATION FOR.
THIRD ANALYSIS AS WELL AS I'' VE SEEN THIS.
WHEN, throughout THE MINUTES IT DOES SAY CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
IT'' S– THE ACTIVITY IS PUT. AS WELL AS IN THE CENTER OF PAGE 18 OF 50 AUTHORIZATION FOR THIRD.
READING, IT CLAIMS CARRIED BUT IT.
DOES NOT SAY BROUGHT ALL AND IT'' S REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THREE
. READINGS. SO ADD UNANIMOUSLY TO THE MINUTES.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: WE CANISTER.
TAKE THAT AS A CLERICAL ENHANCEMENT.
>> > > PAGE 41 OF 50 OF THE VERY SAME COLLECTION.
THAT ' S INTEGRATED THROUGHOUT THE CHANGED MOTION. > > THAT ' S WHAT I DO. THAT ' S MY NEXT TASK.
AGENDA. THE CONSENT SCHEDULE.
THANKS, ALDERMAN PINCOTT.
DO I HAVE A SECONDER? THANKS, ALDERMAN STEVENSON AND. ALDERMAN HODGES. > > YES, THANKS, YOUR PRAYER.
I ' D LIKE >> TO PULL UE 201106 THE. MULTIFAMILY RECYCLING OPPORTUNITIES OUT OF THE PERMISSION. SCHEDULE– I WASN ' T AT THE.
MEETING FOR THIS SCHEDULE.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I WILL. MOVE THAT TO 10.4.2 UNDER.
UTILITIES ENVIRONMENT SPCP DO I NEED An ACTIVITY FOR THAT? CAN I HAVE An ACTIVITY TO THAT WITH. OWN OF CONSENWITH– YOU TIN ' T, N'CHABOT? MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN CARRA. ON THAT PARTICULAR ONE ARE WE CONCURRED? ANY OPPOSED? DONE. ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO CARRY OUT THE CONSENT AGENDA. WE HAVE An ACTIVITY TO APPROVE THE.
CONSENT PROGRAM. THAT TAKES United States THEN TO OUR PUBLIC.
HEARING PRODUCTS. >> > > YOUR WORSHIP, IT WAS FUTURE.
MEMBER I WANTED TO PULL OUT.
> > LATER ON IN THE SCHEDULE. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: IF WE'' RE GOING TO PULL THEM OFF.
CONSENT PROGRAM LET'' S PUT THEM. WITH THE BOARD. ALL RIGHT. AS WELL AS GIVEN THE CHANGE THAT.
ALDERMAN CHABOT PUT TO OUR SCHEDULE, WE'' RE GOING TO DEAL WITH.
ITEM 7.2 IN YOUR AGENDA PRIOR TO.
7.17.2 IS CPC 2011-027 AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND USAGE.
LAW. AND ALSO WE'' LL SIMPLY DO A LITTLE MUSIC CHAIRS UP HERE. AND THEN WE'' LL BE EXCELLENT TO GO. YOU ALL SET FOR US >>? > > YES, EXCELLENT MORNING, YOUR.
PRAYER AS WELL AS COUNCIL. MY NAME IS LAURIE KIMBER AS WELL AS I'' M BELOW REPRESENTING THE.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CALGARY.
PLANNING PAYMENT FOR CPC 2011-027 TO ALLOW DIGITAL THIRD.
CELEBRATION MARKETING AND ALSO MESSAGE.
INDICATORS IN CALGARY.WITH ME TODAY ON MY LEFT IS. Mr. KEN MELONSON.
OF IRREVERSIBLE PLAN AS WELL AS POLICIES
. AT THAT TIME, THE INTERIM REGULATIONS. OF A DIGITAL THIRD EVENT ADVERTISING INDICATOR.
THEY ARE DESIGNED AS WELL AS POSITIONED TO OBTAIN THE FOCUS OF DRIVERS. AND ALSO PASSENGERS IN MOTOR AUTOMOBILES.
IN ORDER TO CONNECT AN ADVERTISING AND MARKETING MESSAGE. THEY ARE CALLED 3RD EVENT.
SITE.THIS PICTURE SHOWS AN INSTANCE.
OF AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE SIGN. BECAUSE, it IS VARIOUS THAN A THIRD CELEBRATION ADVERTISING INDICATOR. IT SHARES MESSAGES CONCERNING. BUSINESSES AS WELL AS THE ASSOCIATED PRODUCTS THAT ARE LOCATED ON THE.
WEBSITE. THE GUIDELINES FOR OTHER KINDS OF SIGNS IN CALGARY INCLUDING.
ADVERTISING AS WELL AS MESSAGE SIGNS, AND ALSO CONVENTIONAL ONES ARE SHOWN
. REVIEW THE STANDINGS OF CALGARY ' S PRESENT INDICATION REGULATIONS AS WELL AS EXPLAIN. ENABLE DIGITAL SIGNS IN SOME AREAS OF CALGARY ARE BEING.
THE OVERHEAD REVEALS A BASIC HISTORY OF CALGARY ' S SIGN RULES. BEING THE SIGNBOARD GUIDELINES AS WELL AS.
POLICY IN 1999. THERE WAS SOME REORGANIZATION OF.

THE INDICATION GUIDELINES IN BYLAW 1 P. 2011.
BUT THE APPROACH WAS THAT–.
2007. A REVIEW WOULD BE DONE AFTER THE FIRST IMPLEMENTATION AS WELL AS. MONITORING WOULD BE DONE.
IT WILL DESCRIBED APPOINTMENT WITH COMMUNITY GROUPS AND THE. PUBLIC. AT THE MAY 13th, 2010 MEETING OF THE CALGARY PLANNING. PAYMENT IT WAS REQUESTED.
ADMINISTRATION MANAGE DIGITAL SIGNS. THIS MOVEMENT WAS BASED ON AN.
FAST FOSTERING OF DIGITAL INDICATOR MODERN TECHNOLOGY IN CALGARY AS IT WAS. BEING EXECUTED QUICKLY BY THE.
MARKETING INDUSTRY BEFORE ANY NEW INDICATION RULES AS WELL AS PLAN. AND ALSO PRIOR TO INTERACTION WITH.
THE INCREASING NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS FOR DIGITAL. ADVERTISING AND MARKETING SIGNS IN CALGARY.
WITH 7 OF 9 APPLICATIONS IN 2009 BEING AUTHORIZED BY THE SDAB,. INCREASING TO 15 APPLICATIONS IN. 2010. THIS MAP ON THE OVERHEAD

REVEALS. THE PLACES OF SOME
OF THE.

OVER 300 3RD PARTY ADVERTISING SIGNS IN CALGARY. THE PURPLE CELEBRITIES SHOW WHERE THE.
CITY HAS ACTUALLY APPROVED DIGITAL INDICATORS AND ALSO THE GREEN STARS PROGRAM IN WHICH.
DIGITAL SIGNS HAVE BEEN APPROVED.
BY THE SDAB. A FEW OF THESE DIGITAL SIGNS HAVE.
REPLACED PREVIOUSLY EXISTING.
STANDARD ADVERTISING SIGNS AS WELL AS THE GOLD CIRCLES REPRESENT.
THESE CONVENTIONAL ADVERTISING.
INDICATIONS. AS WELL AS ULTIMATELY, YOUR PRAISE, THE.
RED DOTS PROGRAM THE LOCATIONS OF.
THE DIGITAL 3RD PARTY ADVERTISING AND MARKETING SIGNS THAT ARE.
CURRENTLY IN PROGRESSION. IN DEVELOPING THE MODIFICATIONS TODAY, WE MET AND LISTENED TO.
STAKEHOLDERS. THREE MEETINGS WERE ACCEPTED NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP AGENTS.
IN APRIL, SEPTEMBER AND.
OCTOBER 2010.

THE GENERAL CONSENSUS WAS NOT IN.
FAVOUR OF DIGITAL THIRD CELEBRATION.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING SIGNS DUE TO CONCERNS EXPRESSED ABOUT HOW.
THEIR VISIBILITY IMPACTS THE.
ENVIRONMENT AND HOW– THE IMPACT THAT THEY HAVE ON THE USE.
AND ENJOYMENT OF RESIDENCE UNITS.
WHEN THEY'' RE ADVICABLE. AREA STAKEHOLDERS SHARED.
A WISH FOR POLICIES THAT REQUIRED.
DIGITAL SIGNS TO BE A MINIMAL AWAY FROM STRUCTURES. THE STRUCTURE OF THE PROPOSED.
REGULATIONS WAS DISTRIBUTED TO INDUSTRY ORGANIZATIONS ON.
NOVEMBER 1st, 2010. AND WHILE NO CONSENSUS ON THE POLICIES WAS ACCOMPLISHED, THERE WAS.
GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT THE.
GUIDELINES GOVERNING ILLUMINATIONS, LOCATION AND ALSO PICTURE REFRESH.
PERIODS WERE NEEDED. THE FUNCTION THESE DAYS'' S MODIFICATION ARE RULES TO OVERVIEW IN WHICH DIGITAL. INDICATIONS CAN FIND AS WELL AS HOW THEY.
RUN. BECAUSE CALGARY'' S EXISTING RULES. WERE NOT DESIGNED TO HANDLE LED. TECHNOLOGY, WE DO NOT HAVE RULES TO MANAGE INDICATOR ILLUMINATION,.
ACTION TO AMBIENT LIGHT, IMAGE.
REFRESH TIMING, THE DISTANCE FROM THE SIGN TO THE HIGHWAY,.
THE EFFECT ON RESIDENTIAL MAKES USE OF.
OR PLAN THAT GUIDES WHAT LAND USAGE DISTRICTS ARE APPROPRIATE.
FOR DIGITAL SIGNS. THE TECHNOLOGY USED FOR DIGITAL SIGNS IS SIMILAR TO TV. THE PHOTOS CAN CHANGE PROMPTLY AS.
WELL AS THE COLOURS AND ALSO THE BRIGHTNESS DEGREES. THERE IS SOME PROOF THAT.
DIGITAL SIGNS HAVE A DIFFERENT ESTHETIC AND ALSO SECURITY IMPACT AS.
CONTRASTED TO NONDIGITAL SIGNS. THE REASON THEY MAY HAVE A DIFFERENT SAFETY EFFECT IS THAT.
THE PICTURES ARE BRIGHTER AND ALSO CONTAINER.
CHANGE PROMPTLY, POSSIBLY ORDERING THE ATTENTION AND ALSO THE.
EXPECTATIONS OF THE MOTORIST OF A.
VEHICLE ABOUT THE PRESENT AND ALSO THE UPCOMING PICTURE. THE FASTER THE SIGN IMAGES.
REMEMBER FRESH, THE GREATER THE POTENTIAL FOR DRIVER.
INTERRUPTION. A RECORD BY An IDENTIFIED EXPERT IN THE FIELD ENGINEERING.
PSYCHOLOGIST GERRY WACHTEL ON.
THE SECURE IMPACTS OF DIGITAL SIGN MODERN TECHNOLOGY SHOWS THE.
HUMAN EYE IS HARD WIRED TO BE.
DRAWN TO THE BRIGHTEST THINGS ON THE SCENE AS WELL AS THOSE THAT DISPLAY SCREEN.
MOVEMENT OR APPARENT ACTIVITY. MARKETING SIGNS ARE VARIOUS THAN COMPANY IDENTIFICATION.
INDICATORS. SINCE THE PHOTOS AND ALSO MESSAGE ARE MADE BY MARKETING.
PROFESSIONALS TO DELIBERATELY.
RECORD THE ATTENTION OF DRIVERS AND PASSENGERS AND ALSO TO EMPHASIS THAT.
INTEREST OF DRIVERS ON THE.
MARKETING MESSAGE.BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION SIGNS. SHOWN ON THE EXPENSES HAVE A. DIFFERENT RESULT ON
DRIVERS THAN DIGITAL ADVERTISING BECAUSE THEY.
SELL An ITEM. THE EFFECT OF BUSINESS RECOGNITION AUTHORIZES IS.
ALLEVIATED BY THE ESSENTIAL.
WAY-FINDING OBJECTIVE THAT THEY OFFER. THE ESTHETIC CONCERNS ABOUT.
DIGITAL INDICATORS CONNECT TO THEIR COMPATIBILITY AS WELL AS IMPACT ON.
NEARBY USES. SIGNBOARDS CAN MESS THE SETTING AS WELL AS CANISTER BE.
ARCHITECTURALLY INCOMPATIBLE.
WITH NEARBY BUILDINGS. THE BRIGHTNESS LEVELS CAN EFFECT.
THE HIGH QUALITY OF LIFE ON MIXED USAGE.
AS WELL AS RESIDENTIAL AREAS. THEY CANISTER ALSO AFFECT THE.
ENJOYMENT OF PARKS AND PATHWAYS.
AND THE AESTHETIC QUALITY OF THE METROPOLITAN LANDSCAPE. SOME OF THESE ISSUES HAVE.
ALREADY HAPPENED IN CANADA. AS SHOWN BY THIS RECENT POST.
REGARDING THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL.
JOIN HOUSE UNITS IN THE CITY OF WINNIPEG. CALGARY'' S METROPOLITAN ADVANCEMENT.
PLAN PICTURES AS WELL AS ADVERTISES HIGHER DENSITY AT ROADWAY.
CORRIDORS. LARGE DIGITAL SIGNS ARE NOT ORIENTED IN THE DIRECTION OF PEDESTRIANS BUT.
RATHER IN THE DIRECTION OF THE DRIVERS OF.
AUTOMOBILES AS WELL AS THE EFFECTS OF THESE SIGNS MY DISCOURAGE INDIVIDUALS FROM.
WANTING TO RESIDE IN THE AREAS.
WHERE OUR POLICIES SEEK TO PROMOTE VIBRANT, EFFECTIVE MIXED.
USAGE AREAS. St.JOHN ' S, TORONTO AND ALSO QUEBEC CITY HAVE MINIMUM 10-SECOND.
MESSAGE TIMES ALONG WITH AMBIENT.
LIGHT EMISSION SPECIFICATIONS. AS WELL AS SOME RESTRICTIONS ON.
PLACE. THE CITY OF VANCOUVER DOES NOT ALLOW ANY NEW BILLBOARDS WHATSOEVER.
INCLUDING DIGITAL BILLBOARDS. THERE ARE LIKEWISE A SELECTION OF RULES IN NUMEROUS U.S. CITIES AND ALSO.
STATES WHERE ARE MINIMUM MESSAGE.
REFRESH TIMES VARIETY FROM 6 SECONDS TO 60 MINS WHILE LOTS OF.
CITIES HAVE STRAIGHT-OUT BANS ON.
DIGITAL BILLBOARDS INCLUDING DENVER AND ALSO DALLAS. THE PROPOSED POLICIES DO.
ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THERE IS An AREA FOR DIGITAL SIGNS IN.
CALGARY. THE POLICIES ARE CREATED TO ALLOW BUT TO CONSERVATIVELY MANAGE.
THOSE INDICATORS UP UNTIL COUNCIL.
APPROVES PERMANENT PLAN AS WELL AS RULES. THE POLICIES RECOMMENDED IN BYLAW 15 P.
2011 INCLUDE A MINIMUM MESSAGE TIME OF 10 SECONDS WITH A.
MAXIMUM 1-SECOND CHANGE.
TIME. THE 10-SECOND INTERVAL MINIMIZES.
THE POSSIBLE FOR DRIVER.
DIVERSION. FULL MOVEMENT VIDEO BLINKING OR.
MODIFICATIONS IN COMPARISON OR.
BRIGHTNESS THROUGHOUT A MESSAGE ARE PROHIBITED. A MAXIMUM ILLUMINATION LEVEL.
DURING THE DAY AND AT NIGHT IS INCLUDED IN THE RULES. AND INDICATIONS MUST NOT OVERLY GO BEYOND.
THE AMBIENT LIGHT LEVELS.DIGITAL ADVERTISING AND MARKETING

SIGNS AND. DIGITAL MESSAGE INDICATIONS MUST BE. SEPARATED BY 300 METRES.
REFLECTING A LONG-STANDING. EXISTING RULE IN THE LAND USE. BYLAW.

THAT AREN'' T FAMILIAR WITH ME
, I ' M. JASON WAS THIS YEAR'' S. NEXT YEAR IT ' S GOING TO AN. AS WELL AS NOW I'' VE
HEARD IT ' S. CORPORATE PROPERTIES QUALITIESISSUE > > YOUR PRAISE, I ' M NOT FAMILIAR WITH THAT SPECIFIC. > > THAT ' S WHAT I DO.AS WELL AS DIGITAL SIGNS NECESSITY NOT BE
LOCATED WITHIN 30 METRES OF A.
ROAD INTERSECTION. THE REGULATIONS ADDITIONALLY SUGGEST THE.
DIGITAL SIGNS SIGNS NOT BE.
LOCATED WITHIN 150 METRES OF THE DWELLING SYSTEM IN THE BELT LINE.
OR DOWNTOWN. AND 300 METRES OF A RESIDENCE SYSTEM IN OTHER PLACES IN THE CITY. THE TECHNIQUE UTILIZED TO PROCEDURE THE.
PROBLEM IS SHOWN ON THE EXPENSES. THIS OVERHEAD REVEALS A DIGITAL.
INDICATIONS AT A 300 METRE RANGE, YOUR PRAISE. THE RULES ALSO CALL FOR THAT.
DIGITAL THIRD CELEBRATION ADVERTISING AUTHORIZES BE LOCATED 14 METRES FROM.
A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE WHICH IS BASED.
ON AN 80 KILOMETRE-AN-HOUR SUPPOSED RATE LIMITATION. THIS DEMAND CAN BE RELAXED.
WHEN THE POSTED SPEED RESTRICTION IS 60 KILOMETRES AN, DOWN TO 6 METRES.
HR OR LESS. THE PROPOSED GUIDELINES LIKEWISE CALL FOR THE DIGITAL SIGNS BE SHUT OFF.
WHEN CLOSE TO, at SPECIFIC HRS.
RESIDENTIAL UTILIZES WITH THIS RULE ALSO BEING RELAXABLE. THE REMAINDER OF THE RULES FOR.
DIGITAL THIRD CELEBRATION MARKETING SIGNS IN STIPULATIONS OF SIGHTING AND.
PROBLEMS FROM MAJOR PARKS, THEIR.
DIMENSION AND ALSO RESTRICTED ROADS CONTINUE TO BE THE LIKE FOR.
TRADITIONAL INDICATIONS. THE REGULATIONS IN DISTRICTS IN WHICH CONVENTIONAL THIRD CELEBRATION.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING SIGNS CAN OCCUR.
STAY UNCHANGED BUT DIGITAL 3RD PARTY ADVERTISING AND MARKETING SIGNS.
ARE NOT PROPOSED TO BE PROVIDED AS.
DISCRETIONARY MAKES USE OF IN THE NEIGHBOURHOOD, NEIGHBORHOOD AND.
COMMERCIAL HALLWAY BLENDED USE.
AREAS WHERE STAYING DEVICES ARE ENABLED AND INDEED.
URGED. GOING ONWARD, YOUR WORSHIP, MANAGEMENT WILL REMAIN TO.
INTERACT AS WELL AS CONSULT WITH THE.
PUBLIC, NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS AS WELL AS THE INDICATOR AS WELL AS ADVERTISING.
SECTOR TO COMPLETE THE EVALUATION.
AND THE REDESIGN OF THE INDICATION POLICIES. WITH CONCLUSION TARGETED AT THE.
END OF 2012.

CALGARY PLANNING PAYMENT.
RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL ADOPT.
THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO LAW 1 P 2007 AND GIVE 3 ANALYSES.
TO BYLAW 15 P 2011.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: MANY THANKS REALLY MUCH. ONE FAST QUESTION FOR.
INFORMATION WHICH IS GIVEN THAT WE'' RE LOOKING AT THESE.
BYLAWS TODAY AS WELL AS YOU REVEALED ON A.
MAP THE PLACE OF A VARIETY OF INDICATORS, ARE THEY ALL ILLEGAL.
TODAY AND YET THEY'' RE UP. ANYHOW? > >> YOUR PRAISE, A NUMBER OF.
DIGITAL CELEBRATION MARKETING INDICATORS.
HAVE BEEN ABRUISED BY THE SDAB.– ACCEPTED. THERE HAVE BEEN A FEW BY.
ADMINISTRATION AND THERE'' S AT LEAST ONE–.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
THEY'' VE BEEN ACCEPTED IN A POLICY VACUUM CLEANER IS THAT FAIR TO.
SAY?
>>> >, THAT IN A VACUUM CLEANER FROM ANY GUIDELINES THAT ARE OVERT.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU.QUESTION OF INFORMATION,. ALDERMAN MAR.
YOU GET QUESTIONS FOR ADMINISTRATION LATER. > > IT IS IN FACT A GENUINE QUESTION.
TO THE IMAGES WHERE IT'' S NIGHTTIME– AMONG THE VERY.
FIRST SLIDES. INDEED. SOMETHING LIKE THAT. CURRENTLY, YOU'' D STATED IN YOUR. DISCUSSION THAT THERE WERE DIFFERENT ILLUMINATION DEGREES FOR
. NIGHT AND ALSO DAY? IS THAT CORRECT? DO YOU HAVE AN IMAGE OF ONE FOR.
THE DAY OR OTHERWISE? NOTHING CLOSER? BECAUSE THAT I TIN HARDLY SEE.
DESPITE MY GLASSES.
>> > > I DON ' T KNOW IF HE CAN ZOOM– IS THERE SOMETHING. CLOSER? > > IF THAT ' S ALL WE ' VE GOT, THAT ' S ALL WE ' VE GOT. THAT WAS MY INQUIRY. I WISHED TO KNOW IF THERE WAS A DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE NIGHT.

SHOT AS WELL AS THE DAY SHOT.
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:. THANKS, ALDERMAN MAR FOR REALLY> A CONCERN OF INFORMATION. ALDERMAN CHABOT? > > THANKS, YOUR WORSHIP. A NUMBER OF QUESTIONS OF. INFORMATION.
THE FIRST ONE CONCERNS THE ONE-SECOND TRANSITION TIME THAT. YOU REFERENCED.
THAT DOESN ' T SEEM TO MAKE
SENSE FEELING ME. THE MAXIMUM CANISTER ' T EXCEED ONE. > > YOUR PRAISE, THE OBJECTIVE OF.
TRANSITION FROM ONE INDICATION TO THE. NEXT.
IN OTHER WORDS, THERE IS A SIGN. PHOTO UP AND AFTER THAT THE INDICATOR PHOTO
. DISAPPEARS AND THE NEXT INDICATION PICTURE >> TURNS UP. RATHER THAN FADE IN, FADE OUT,.'MOVEMENT RIGHT, MOTION LEFT. > > BUT THE MEANS IT ' S WRITTEN, IT. DOESN ' T SAY THAT. IT STATES THE MAXIMUM IS ONE SECOND. TO ENSURE THAT MEANS I COULD HAVE IT
>>. 1/10 OF A 2ND WHICH WOULD LOOK LIKE A

FLASH. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I. THINK WHAT Mr.KIMBER IS
SAYING IT WITH INSTANTANEOUSLY. SWITCH TO ANOTHER PERSON PICTURE. WHAT THE IMPACT OF THE POLICY IS TO PREVENT COMPUTER ANIMATION. BUS THAT'' S WHAT ' S DISTRACTING. , if IT WAS EVEN MORE THAN ONE SECONDLY YOU COULD HAVE
AN ANIMATIONCOMPUTER ANIMATION. GOING ON AT THE VERY SAME TIME.
>> > > NO, BECAUSE– ANYWAYS, I TIN GO INTO INFORMATION FURTHER ABOUT.
THAT YOU TIN'' T HAVE IT FADE IN OR FADE OUT. VIA THE TRANSITION TIME. IT NEED TO BE A MINIMAL OF ONE SECONDLY, NOT An OPTIMUM.
DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT COULD BE 1/100 OF A.
SECOND WHICH WOULD LOOK LIKE A FLASH. I WILL CERTAINLY SUGGEST THAT POINT LATER. THE 6 SECONDS VERSUS TEN SECONDS THAT YOU REFERENCED, I'' M. JUST WONDERING, DUE TO THE FACT THAT I ' VE. LISTENED TO OR ELSE IN REGARDS TO WHAT IS THE CRITERION. AND ALSO YOU STATE THE COMMON IS EVEN MORE.
IN THE 10-SECOND TIME FRAMEWORK.

>> >'> I ' LL ASK Mr. MELONSON TO.
PUT UP THE VERY BEST TECHNIQUE.
RESEARCH STUDY. A VARIETY OF CITIES ARE START.
TO HANDLE IT. THE BEST PRACTICES THAT WE'' VE IDENTIFIED FROM St. JOHN'' S,. QUEBEC CITY AND TORONTO ARE THAT.
THERE IS A 10-SECOND MESSAGE LAYOUT ON A 6-SECOND MESSAGE.
INDICATION. THE PURPOSE, YOUR PRAISE, OF THE MESSAGE PERIOD IS THAT–.
OR THE CONCEPT BEHIND IT IS.
THE FASTER THE IMAGES FRESHEN, THE EVEN MORE QUICKLY THEY REFRESH,.
THE GREATER CAPACITY THERE IS.
FOR CHAUFFEUR DIVERSION SO THAT THE DRIVER'' S INTEREST IS. ORIENTED TOWARDS THE INDICATIONS,.
PREPARING FOR THE NEXT INDICATION AND THE NEXT SIGN. SO THE LONGER PERIOD DECREASES.
THAT– >> > > YOU ' RE GOING WAY BEYOND THE
. QUESTION WHICH IS JUST WHAT IS.
THE STANDARD, 10 SECONDLY VERSUS 6 SECONDS IF YOU HAD FURTHER.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: WE ' RE ACQUIRING INTO ARGUMENT FROM. > > THANK YOU, Mr. KIMBER. AS WELL AS WHAT'' S THE GENESIS– OR WHAT'' S THE BASIS, WHAT ' S THE.
MUCH AWAY THE INDICATOR IS> FROM THE. STREET? > > YES, YOUR PRAYER.
I MIGHT NEED TO CALL ON MY. ASSOCIATE TO EXPLAIN THE RECOMMENDATION TO SPEED IN THE.
>> DIFFERENT OBSTACLES. > > YOUR PRAISE, MAYOR NENSHI, I ' M WITH THE TRANSPORTATION. PLANNING. THE FIELD OF VIEW, FIELD OF VIEW, IS CHANGING DEPENDING ON.
RATE. AT 60 KILOMETRES AN HOUR, FIELD OF VISION IS 20 ° AS WELL AS HUNDRED.
KILOMETRES AN HOUR IS 10 °. AND ALSO THE SIDE RANGE IS ALTERING WITH THE SPEED. FURTHERMORE, CEASING SIGHT.
DISTANCE IS CHANGING AS WELL FOR A VEHICLE TO COME TO A FULL.
QUIT. AT 60 KILOMETRES AN HOUR IS 85 METRES. AND ALSO AT HUNDRED KILOMETRES PER.
HR, WHICH IS FIRST COLUMN, IS …
[Indiscernible]>> > > WHAT IS THE BASIS ON WHICH THIS TABLE WAS ESTABLISHED? WAS THIS CREATED FOR THIRD.
CELEBRATION INDICATORS OR ESTABLISHED FOR FREEWAY SIGNAGE?
>> > > THESE ARE PREVIOUSLY OWNED FOR– IT.
IS– THE TOOL IS CALLED– IT IS DEVELOPED FOR FREEWAY INDICATORS. IF YOU'' RE TO STOP BEFORE
THE RED. LIGHT– > > IN VARIOUS OTHER WORDS IF I WAS.
DRIVING DOWN A FREEWAY, THAT'' S. FOR HOW LONG IT WOULD TAKE ME TO IDENTIFY AN DEPARTURE INDICATION SO I.
COULD ACTUALLY MANEUVER INTO THE.
LEAVE AT A PROVIDED SPEED.

>>> >, THAT>>. > > IT IS REALLY ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO PERFORM.
> > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAISE. >> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANKS, ALDERMAN LOWE.
INFORMATION, I'' M REALLY FASCINATED BY THIS VISUAL, I.
HAVE NO SUGGESTION HOW TO READ IT BUT.
I LIKE WHOLE LOTS OF NUMBERS, SO MANY THANKS FOR THAT. I WILL ASK, THEN, IF THERE ARE.
PARTICIPANTS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC EXISTING WHO WISH TO SPEAK IN.
FAVOUR OF THIS PROPOSAL. ANYBODY THAT WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOUR OF THIS PROPOSITION. ANY PERSON WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK.
> > THAT IS A MASSIVE ALLEVIATION. GOOD EARLY MORNING, YOUR WORSHIP, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.
VICE-PRESIDENT OF PATTISON OUTDOOR MARKETING. I HAVE 35 COPIES OF OUR.
ENTRY FOR DISCUSSION IF I MAY. MY INTENT IS TO BRIEFLY PROGRAM YOU.
AN ACTUAL STATIC DIGITAL BILLBOARD AD AS WELL AS MAKE SOME.
TOTAL REMARKS. OUR INDUSTRY HAS BEEN PART OF THIS CITY FOR GREATER THAN A.
HUNDRED YEARS. AS WELL AS THROUGH THE YEARS, WE'' VE EMPLOYED LOTS OF NEW DIFFERENT.
INNOVATIONS FROM HAND PAINTING.
TO SILK TESTING TO ROTARY POSTERS THAT SCREEN 3.
VARIOUS ADS ON SLABBERS 3 TO 4.
SECONDS AS YOU CURRENTLY SEE ON THE STREET. WE'' RE NOW IN THE DIGITAL AGE AND.
WHAT YOU SEE RIGHT HERE IS OUR STATIC DIGITAL POSTER. THERE'' S A SMOOTH SHIFT BETWEEN ADS.
INCLUDED AT ALL.ONLY STATIC PHOTOS. THE BILLBOARD ' S SIZE IS A. REQUIREMENT CALGARY DIMENSION, 10 FEET BY 20 FEET. THE INDICATORS ARE OUTFITTED WITH. LIGHT SENSORS TO ADJUST TO LIGHT LEVELS AND A CAM SO THEY ARE. MONITORED IN ALL TIMES.
THIS STYLE OF BILLBOARD DOES AWAY WITH PAPER MODERN TECHNOLOGY AND ALSO. NEEDS MUCH LESS MAINTENANCE.
THAN EXISTING BILLBOARDS.
OUR SECTOR HAS NO CONCERN WITH. MEANTIME REGULATION OF THIS TYPE.
OF SIGNS. IT IS NOT A NEW PRODUCT. IT HAS BEEN USED AROUND THE. WORLD FOR OVER TEN YEARS. AS WELL AS IN CANADA FOR ABOUT 3. THE MAJORITY OF JURISDICTIONS THAT HAVE. INDICATIONS SIMILAR TO THIS UTILIZE A SIX-SECOND REFRESH RATE LIKE WE. DO. IN EDMONTON THEY SIMPLY COMPLETED A NEW COLLECTION OF RULES, AND ALSO. THAT WAS ONE OF THINGS THAT. THEY RECENTLY AGREED TO RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL. THERE IS SUFFICIENT EXPERIENCE OUT. THERE WITH USING THIS INNOVATION TO BE ABLE TO. DETERMINE ITS INFLUENCE AND ALSO REGULATE.
THEM FOR THE EXCELLENT OF ALL INVOLVED.
WHEN I SAY “ALL” I SUGGEST TO. CONSIST OF THE “SECTOR AND ALSO THE HUNDREDS OF BUSINESSES AND. CHARITIES IN CALGARY THAT. TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS FORM OF MARKETING. AS RESIDENTS THAT ARE. EDUCATED BY IT.THAT CLAIMED, OUR DIFFERENCES WITH.

MANAGEMENT NOW.
BECAUSE THEY HAVE APPROACHED THIS TYPES OF SIGNAGE, arise MOSTLY. AS SOMETHING DRASTICALLY NEW AND ALSO.
HAVE BEEN IN THEIR WORD “TRADITIONALIST” WITH THESE REGULATIONS. WHERE INDUSTRY SEES A REASONABLE. REGULATIVE SERVICE FOR TROUBLES WHICH MANAGEMENT DETERMINES,. THE SUGGESTED OPTIONS BEFORE. COUNCIL TODAY ARE OF A COMPLETELY PROHIBITORY NATURE.
CONCURRED TO LIGHT LEVEL AND ALSO IN A THREE-YEAR TERM FOR DIGITAL. WE DO NOT THINGS TO MOST OF THE BRAND-NEW REGULATIONS.
HOWEVER, THERE ARE FIVE OF THEM. WHICH WILL CERTAINLY SIGNIFICANTLY INFLUENCE US AS WELL AS OUR CUSTOMERS, AND THESE WE. CAN NOT AGREE WITH. WE HAVE TRANSPORTATION AND LIGHTING EXPERTS BELOW THESE DAYS TO. ADDRESS SOME OF THOSE RULES AND ALSO. MY COLLEAGUES WILL HANDLE THEM ALSO. WE SINCERELY HOPE THAT COUNCIL. WILL AUTHORIZE THE GUIDELINES WITH THE AFFORDABLE CHANGES WE WOULD LIKE.
TO SEE MADE TO THEM. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU QUITE. I WAS REALLY TEMPTED TO SAY THAT I COULDN ' T CONCENTRATE ON WHAT YOU.
SIDETRACKED BY THE INDICATOR BUT THAT WOULD BE MEAN. CONCERNS FOR Mr. FORSYTHE.
> > Mr. FORSYTHE, IF YOU PUT. THE PHOTO OR THE PHOTO BACK.
WHERE IS THE CAM? > > THE VIDEO CAMERA, YOU CAN SEE IT JUST TO THE RIGHT–
>>. > > BUT I CAN ' T SEE. THAT ' S WHY I ' M ASKING YOU. SO IS'IT ON THE'FRAMEWORK? > > THERE ' S A POLE>> STICKING OUT. OF THE– TO THE INDICATION TO THE BASE RIGHT OF IT. AND THAT IS A CAM AT THE END.
OF IT. SO IT IS TOTALLY CHECKED AT.
ALL TIMES.
>> > > BUT DOES IT MONITOR THE VEHICLES OR DOES IT CHECK THE.
SIGN?
>> > > IT CHECKS THE INDICATOR TO MAKE CERTAIN IT'' S PERFORMANCE CORRECTLY.
>> > > SUPPOSE IT ISN'' T? > > THEN IT ' S SEEN BY THE INDIVIDUALS THAT CHECK IT AS WELL AS CAN BE
SHUT. DOWN IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.
>> >

> OKAY.DO YOU HAVE A LITTLE REMINDER OR.
SOMETHING THAT CAN SHOW ME WHERE.
THIS VIDEO CAMERA IS? THE ARM EXPANDING OUT THE BASE.
HAND CORNER.
>> > > YEAH. ALL OF OUR SIGNS, IT IS HARD TO.
SEE, BUT THERE IS A VIDEO CAMERA ON.
EVERY ONE. >> > > NOW, THIS IS A MODEST DIMENSION,.
, if WE WERE REASONING IN STIPULATIONS OF.
.
BILLBOARDS. IS THIS A TYPICAL DIMENSION, MAXIMUM.
SIZE OR CRITERION DIMENSION?
>> > > THIS IS THE COMMON CALGARY DIMENSION THAT YOU SEE MOST.
ANYWHERE, 10 FEET BY 20 FEET.
>> > > LOOKS A LITTLE SHORTER, IS THIS 10 BY 20?
>> > > YEAH.
10 BY 20. ALL OF OUR SIGNS HAVE REPLACED.
EXISTING INDICATIONS, 10 BY 20 INDICATORS.
> > IT SIMPLY
LOOKS A LITTLE. THANK YOU. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: WE GOT SOME SPEAKERS CHECKLIST FOR YOU,.
Mr. FORSYTHE. THANK YOU, Mr.FORSYTHE.
QUESTIONS CONCERNING LIGHT FOR. ADMINISTRATION AND AS'I COMPREHEND IT, THERE ' S DIFFERENT.
EVENING. AND ALSO YOUR DISCUSSION
YOU CLAIMED. THERE IS A CAMERA WHICH I CAN. SEE AS WELL AS THAT KEEPS AN EYE ON THE INDICATION.
DOES THAT LIKEWISE ALTER AS WELL AS.
SIGN OVER TIME? > > AMBIENT LIGHT DOES MODIFICATION THE. > > I WOULD LIKE TO DEFER YOUR INQUIRY TO SOME ILLUMINATION INDIVIDUALS.
THAT DO UNDERSTAND THE TECHNICAL.
ELEMENTS OF IT BETTER THAN I DO I DO.
>> > > O.K.. PLEASE. WHOMEVER CAN SOLUTION THE.
INQUIRY.
>> > > YOUR PRAISES AS WELL AS MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, I'' M WITH PATTISON. OUTDOOR MARKETING.
>> > > WOULD YOU MIND REACTIVATING THAT?
>> >'> I ' LL REACTIVATE IT>> ONCE AGAIN. > > IN SOLUTION TO THE INQUIRY, THE CAM OFFERS A DIFFERENT.
FEATURE SIMPLY FOR SECURITY AND.
KEEP THE INTEGRITY OF THE SIGN AS WELL AS WE'' RE WATCHING IT FOR.
MAINTENANCE PERSONS, AS WELL AS OUR.
OPERATIONS CENTRE CONTAINER ENJOY IT.THE SECONDLY CONCERN WITH THE.
CHAIR, VIA THE MAYOR IS THE.
LIGHT SENSOR, AGAIN DIFFICULT TO SEE BUT ON THE VERY TOP OF THE.
SIGNBOARD IS THE LIGHT SENSING UNIT ON.
LEADING OF THE DIGITAL BILLBOARD IS A LIGHT SENSING UNIT SHAPE OF A.
BEEHIVE. YOU TIN HARDLY SEE IT OVER HER HEAD THERE, A LITTLE WHITE.
DEVICE. THAT PROCEDURES THE AMBIENT ILLUMINATION LEVELS AROUND THE AREA. WHEN THE INDICATOR– SO DURING.
THE DAY, THE INDICATION INTENSITY FUNCTIONS THE MANY UP THE.
SUNSHINE. AND ALSO AT EVENING, IT DECLINE DOWNS TO 10% DEGREES UNDOUBTEDLY AS A RESULT OF.
NIGHTTIME LEVELS THE SIGN.
DOESN'' T REQUIRED TO BE AS LIT LITTLE AS IT IS NOW, GOES DOWN DOWN TO 10%.
OF THE DAYTIME DEGREE.
90% DROP.

>> > > THAT ' S INTERESTING. AND ALSO I PRESUME IT ADJUSTMENTS– IT.
> > CORRECT. CLOUDY DAY IT IS WOULD BE LESS.
THAN WARM DAYS AND MORE.
>> > > SO THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE KNOW WITH EITHER THE PLAIN BILLBOARD.
THAT'' S PAPERED UP AND YOU SEE.
THE PEOPLE PLACING IT UP. THERE'' S THE ONES WHICH ARE. TRIANGULAR IN FORM AND ALSO THEY.
ADJUST. HOW IS THIS DIFFERENT IN STIPULATIONS.
OF THE TIMING OF THE ROTATING.
MECHANICAL ONES VERSUS THIS DIGITAL ONE?
>> > > GREAT CONCERN. I CAN PROBABLY SHOW A VIDEO OF IT BUT I TIN EXPLAIN IT.
RAPIDLY.
>> > > YOU ' RE GOING TO PROGRAM A VIDEO? POSSIBLY THERE'' S EVEN MORE.
>> PRESENTATION. > > I'CAN PREPARE– I ' M THE NEXT SPEAKER AND I TIN
PREPARE AN. >> RESPONSE TO THAT INQUIRY.
AESTHETICALLY. > > YOUR PRAYER, PERHAPS WHAT
I ' LL. DO IS LET THEM SURFACE THE. DISCUSSIONS AND ALSO PUT MY WEB LINK BACK IN. THANK YOU. >'> THANK YOU, YOUR PRAISE. NUMBER OF INQUIRIES. IF YOU SAW, I ' M NOT CERTAIN. ADMINISTRATION '
S PRESENTATION,
BUT THEY DID SHOW A CONE THAT. THEY WOULD BE USING AS THEIR. OVERVIEW IN REGARDS TO
THE OBSTACLES FROM RESIDENTIAL INNER CITY. VERSUS THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS. AND ALSO I ' M JUST WONDERING WHAT YOUR THOUGHTS REMAIN IN REGARDS TO THAT.
NEW KIND OF PROPOSITION.
>> > > I ASSUME, ONCE MORE, ALDERMAN CHABOT, SEVERAL OF THE PEOPLE THAT. WE HAVE HERE WILL BE ADDRESSING.
THAT ISSUE.SO THAT WILL CERTAINLY COME AS PART OF OUR. DISCUSSION.
> > 6 SECONDLY VERSUS 10 SECOND. ADMINISTRATION HAS ACTUALLY SUGGESTED THE STANDARD IS EVEN MORE TEN SECONDS.
EXPERIENCE OR YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS–.
>> > > ONCE MORE, THAT WILL BE COVERED. WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE. WE WILL CERTAINLY BE COVERING THAT ISSUE.
REGARDING WHERE OUR SIGNS HAVE A.
SIX-SECOND REFRESH PRICE IN ADDITION TO LOTS OF OTHERS. MUCH MORE IN-DEPTH DETAILS.
ON THAT. >> > > WHAT QUESTIONS WOULD YOU LIKE.
ME TO ASK YOU?
>> > > WELL … REALLY, YES, HAPPY TO SOLUTION.
CONCERNS BUT POSSIBLY AT THE.
END.WE DO HAVE SPECIFIC DETAILED.
DISCUSSIONS THAT HAVE COVERED.
ALL OF THESE AS WELL AS I ASSUME IT'' S BEST TO HAVE THEM ANSWER FOR.
YOU. THEY HAVE CHARTS AS WELL AS GRAPHS IN SOME CIRCUMSTANCES AS WELL AS ADMITTED ILLUMINATION.
SPECIALISTS AS WELL AS TRANSPORTATION.
SPECIALISTS. >> > > O.K.. Mr. FORSYTHE THEN, WHAT ABOUT.
LAND USE ONES? > > CONTAINER WE HAVE THE FULL.
PRESENTATION AND ALSO THEN MAYBE ASK.
CONCERNS? >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: NO. BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE A METHOD OF.
A PERSON GETTING METHOD GREATER THAN THEIR 5 MINS THAN THEY'' RE. FORMERLY ALLOTTED. YOU DON'' T OBTAIN TO COME BACK, SO ANSWER WHAT YOU CONDITIO YOU CA.
>> > > I ASSUME I ' LL ACCEPT THAT.
OFFER.THANK YOU.

> > A FEW OF THE>> LAND USE THAT ARE.
FORBIDDEN, IS THAT SOMETHING YOU ASSUME SHOULD BE AMENDED? I RECOGNIZE I'' D MET WITH AMONG YOUR. ASSOCIATES SPECIFICALLY IN CONNECTION WITH C-CORE DISTRICTS.
BEING BANNED.
>> > > WE DO HAVE GRAVE CONCERNS CONCERNING THE DISTRICTS THAT ARE CURRENTLY.
CONSISTED OF THAT ADMINISTRATION HAS.
BROUGHT ONWARD. ONCE AGAIN, I THINK Mr.REBEKAS IN.
HIS PRESENTATION WILL CERTAINLY BE DID YOU.
EVERRINCOVERINGIN SOME DETIL DE.

>> > > I NOTICED THE SIGN WAS.
CHANGING QUICKLY FROM ONE TO THE.
NEXT AND ALSO TO ME A SUDDEN ADJUSTMENT LIKE THAT IS SOMETHING THAT.
WOULD DRAW MY FOCUS. IT'' S AKIN TO FLASH.
IT MAY NOT BE A FLASH BUT.
SINCE THERE ' S A PARTICULAR LIGHT. OUTPUT RELATED TO THESE DEVICES, THIS IS NOT A REFLECTED.
LIGHT PROBLEM

, THIS IS A. TRANSMITTED LIGHT.SO WHEN YOU ALTER FROM
ONE. IMAGE TO THE NEXT, LIKE THAT,.
WITHOUT A TRANSITION TIME RELATED TO IT, OR MINIMAL.
SHIFT TIME, IT LOOKS LIKE A.
FLASH. IT DRAWS MY ATTENTION. ANY TYPE OF A MODIFICATION LIKE THAT.
WILL CERTAINLY DRAW PEOPLE'' S ATTENTION. AND ALSO THE TECHNOLOGY EXISTS FOR.
YOU GUYS TO MAKE THAT CHANGE.
WITH X NUMBER OF PIXELS APPROXIMATELY LOTS OF LINES AS A CHANGE OVER.
THE WHOLE DISPLAY OVER A LONGER.
AMOUNT OF TIME WHICH WOULD APPEAR LESS LIKE A FLASH. EVEN MORE– SOMETHING THAT'' S EVEN MORE. COMPARABLE TO THE MECHANICAL ONES THAT WE SEE WHERE THEY TURN OVER.
ONE SECTION AT A TIME. IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU WOULD CONSIDER AS COMPONENT OF THE.
TRANSITION BETWEEN THE TWO AS.
OPPOSED TO THIS SUDDEN MODIFICATION? >> > > CERTAINLY THE MODERN TECHNOLOGY.
WOULD EXIST. THIS IS OUR CURRENT VERSION THAT WE UTILIZE THROUGHOUT THE.
DISTRICT AS WELL AS THROUGH MANY OF THE.
COUNTRY.AGAIN, THE TECHNOLOGICAL SIDE OF IT. IN REGARDS TO HOW
THAT WOULD. INFLUENCE OUR SIGNAGE PROBABLY BETTS LEFT WITH Mr. REBEKAS. WHO KNOWS MORE ABOUT THE.
OPERATIONS OF THE INDICATION. > > AND LAWS CONTACTED.> FIT THAT SORT OF.
TRANSITION.
AS WELL AS, TO ME, THAT IS WRONG. WHEN IT TRANSFORMS ALL OF A SUDDEN LIKE.
THAT, IT'' S AKIN TO A FLASH. DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT ' S An UNEXPECTED ADJUSTMENT LIKE THAT, IT AUTOMATICALLY.
DRAWS YOUR ATTENTION TO IT. AND ALSO THAT COULD BE DISTRACTING. AND– WHICH IS WHY I WOULD.
PREFER TO HAVE SEEN SOMETHING.
THAT HAD A LONGER TRANSITION TIME IN BETWEEN ONE DISPLAY AND ALSO THE.
NEXT. AND BEING AS IT BELONGED TO YOUR PRESENTATION, I THOUGHT I'' D. ADDRESS IT BELOW WITH YOU NOW. BECAUSE IT, I HAVE NO FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR YOU AT THIS FACTOR.
WOULD SEEP THAT SEEM THAT I WIE.
TO ADDRESS SEVERAL OF MY QUESTIONS WITH OTHER PRESENTERS.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
ALDERMAN CARRA? >> > > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAISE. CONTAINER YOU TYPE OF– YOU'' RE HERE. REPRESENTING THE EXPERT 3RD PARTY SIGN SECTOR. CANISTER YOU PERHAPS SEPARATE.
BETWEEN THE WORK THAT YOU GUYS DO AND ALSO SOME OF THE KIND OF.
BILLBOARD FLASHY SIGNS THAT WE.
SEE ON MACLEOD PATH THESE DAYS? >> > > WELL, I– I CAN ONLY TALK.
TO REALLY OUR SPECIFIC INDICATORS. OUR FIRM HAS ALWAYS EMBRACED THIS DESIGN THAT YOU SEE BELOW.
WHICH REPRESENTS STATIC.
TECHNOLOGY.WE ' VE DONE

A GREAT DEAL OF FUNCTION AND.
DONE A GREAT DEAL OF RESEARCHES AND FIND.
THAT FOR OUR VERSION OF COMPANY, 3RD PARTY ADVERTISING, IT IS.
THE PRODUCT AS WELL AS THIS IS THE.
FUNCTIONS OF THE INDICATION THAT ARE BEST FOR United States. THERE ARE I BELIEVE SOME FIRST.
CELEBRATION SIGN REPRESENTATIVES THAT ARE LIKELY RIGHT HERE THESE DAYS THAT CANISTER.
TALK TO THE FLASHY VIDEO INDICATION. SEVERAL OF THE INDICATORS– A I'' M NOT KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT THE SOME and authorizations–.
ON SEVERAL OF THE VARIOUS OTHER ONES. I DO KNOW McMAHON ARENA AT CROWCHILD TRAIL IS An ENTIRE.
SEPARATE CONCERN THAT DOES HAVE.
THE VIDEO CLIP INDICATION AS WELL AS WE'' RE OFTEN CONFUSED AS WELL AS IT'' S– OUR– THAT.
IT ' S OUR INDICATION >> BUT THAT IS NOT.
>> OUR MODERN TECHNOLOGY. > > MANY THANKS. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:. THANKS, ALDERMAN CARRA. ALDERMAN LOWE?
>> > > THANK YOU. AND ALSO YOU MAY NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO ANSWER THIS, I CAN MOST LIKELY TO THE.
NEXT INDIVIDUAL. I'' M CURIOUS ABOUT TROUBLE FROM THE SIDE OF THE ROADWAY INDICATOR. IF YOU'' RE NOT, I TIN
CHECK WITH. Mr.REBEKAS WHENEVER HE STANDS. I'' M INTERESTED IN THE RATE.
LIMITATION WHEN DRIVING THAT PASSES THERE AS WELL AS WHETHER OR NOT THAT.
AFFECTS YOUR BUSINESS'' S. RESOLUTION OF AN APPROPRIATE VETBACK FROM A ROAD. AND IF YOU TIN'' T SOLUTION THAT, I. CONTAINER APPRECIATE THAT. >> > > CERTAINLY I BELIEVE IT'' S. PROBABLY BEST LEFT WITH.
Mr. REBEKAS WHO IS THE PROFESSIONAL BECAUSE AREA.
>> > > MY LAST INQUIRY IS DOES.
PATTISON AS WELL AS I'' M ASSUMING OF PICADILLY CIRCUS, THAT'' S THIRD.
CELEBRATION ADVERTISING, TIMES SQUARE. DO WE HAVE ANY EXAMPLES OF THAT IN THE CITY THAT YOUR COMPANY.
OPERATES?
>> > > THAT OUR FIRM RUNS, NO.
>> > > ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY ONE OF THAT.
KIND OF 3RD PARTY SIGNS– >> > > THE JUST ONE THAT TRULY.
COMES CLOSE WIDESPREAD IS.
THE ONE ON– AT McMAHON STADIUM.

> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
LIGHT– > > IN OTHER WORDS IF I WAS.
> > I WOULD LIKE TO POSTPONE YOUR INQUIRY TO SOME LIGHTING INDIVIDUALS.
> > 6 SECONDLY VERSUS TEN SECONDLY. > > CONTAINER WE HAVE THE FULL.ON A LARGE BASIS, ON
> > AND THAT ' S ON FROM WHAT I.
UNDERSTAND FEDERAL LAND NOT SUBJECT TOPIC THE CITY. UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY FEDERAL–.
> >'IT ' S U OF C LAND. >> > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAISE. I ' M NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE EXTENT OF YOUR FIRM ' S PROCEDURES.
ACROSS CANADA, BUT I DO KNOW.
THAT IN TORONTO FOR INSTANCE IN THE YONGE ROAD HALLWAY THERE.
ARE A GREAT DEAL OF MOVING VIDEO.
> > THE MAJORITY OF ARE NOT. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: CONTAINER. > > WELL, TORONTO ' S A CONFUSING.
MAY HAVE SEEN A VARIETY OF.
VARIOUS SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES AND ALSO DUNDAS SQUARE IS An ENTIRE LOCATION SIMILAR.
TO A SMALLER TIMES SQUARE, IF.
YOU WILL. DIFFERENT REGULATIONS AND ALSO CIRCUMSTANCES. I'' M NOT– A GREAT DEAL OF THAT IS A. SEPARATE THIRD CELEBRATION ADVERTISING ON-PREMISE SIGNS IN SOME.
INSTANCES. I'' M NOT COMPLETELY WEA CONSCIOUS OFL THE INFORMATION OF THAT. OUR KIND OF SIGN, GENERALLY WE.
USE A SMALLER DIMENSION OF 10 BY 20 THAT ARE DIFFERENT FROM THOSE.
COLLECTION LOCATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN.
BUILT ESPECIALLY WITHIN A CITY.

>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: IF.
YOU. ALDERMAN KEATING. >> > > MANY THANKS, YOUR WORSHIP. I HAVE A COUPLE BASIC QUESTIONS,. I GUESS, AS WELL AS WE ' VE DISCUSSED THE VARIOUS KINDS OF INDICATORS AS WELL AS
. WE UNDERSTAND THE MECHANICAL ONES THAT.
TURN AND THE FIXED ONES. THOSE OBVIOUSLY ARE LIT UP FROM.
WITHIN SO THERE'' S NO EXTERNAL.
LIGHT BEAMING ON THE SIGN DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT IS THE INDICATOR THAT IS.
LIT ITSELF.
>> > > CORRECT >>. > > WE DO HAVE SIGNS THAT ARE LIT.
WITHOUT. IN OTHER WORDS, THEY HAVE OVERHANGING LIGHTS OR ONES.
BENEATH AND AFTER THAT WE HAVE THE.
>

>> > CORRECT. > > HOW IS'THIS– IT ' S REALLY.
THREE VARIOUS KINDS OF INDICATIONS? SO I'' M SEARCHING FOR THINGS LIKE THE LUMINATION, DIFFERENT THAN.
THE ONES THAT HAVE THE.
STATIONARY OR THE REVOLVING LOCATION-WISE, ALL OF THOSE.
SORTS OF THINGS. I'' M REALLY LOOKING AT– IF I TAKE A LOOK AT THIS SIGN,
IT MAY BE A. LESS INTRUSIVE– I'' M NOT EXACTLY SURE. SINCE THE VARIOUS OTHER ONES MAY ACTUALLY GIVE YOU MORE.
LUMINATION THAN THIS ONE DOES IN.
A RESIDENTIAL LOCATION. I WEAR'' T KNOW, WHICH ' S WHAT.
I ' >> M LOOKING FOR, SOMETHING ALONG.
> > OUR SIGNS HAVE INVARIABLY. SOME ARE FRONT LIT FROM ABOVE OR
BELOW, OTHERS ARE BACK LIT SIGNSINDICATORS > > I PRESUME SIMPLY SO THAT WE.
ADHERE TO UP, WHERE I'' M COMING FROM IS I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW HOW. THESE NEW REGULATIONS DEAL WITH.
THESE DIFFERENTLY THAN TECHNICALLY ANY OTHER INDICATOR. SINCE IN MY SIGHT, ALL INDICATORS.
> > WITHIN REASON WE AGREE. A DIGITAL– WE ARE DIGITAL.
EVERYTHING CURRENTLY. AS WELL AS WE DO SEE THIS AS A.
TRANSITION FROM OUR EXISTING.
INDICATORS. THE ROTARY ONES THAT CHANGE.
EVERY 3 TO 4 SECONDS TO SIGNS.
THAT TRANSFORM EVERY 6 SEC CURRENTLY. >> > > IF THESE ARE LIMITED IN A.
CERTAIN AREA, CONTRASTED TO OTHER.
INDICATORS, BUT THE LUMINATION ON THE OTHER SIGNS IS MORE THAN THIS.
I WONDER WHY.
>> > > AMONG OUR TERRIFIC ISSUES. CORRECT.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
THANKS, ALDERMAN KEATING. EL ADAM? KEAT ALDERMAN.
DEMONG? >> > > HOW FAR ARE WE FROM.
THIS?
>> > > KID, THAT'' S NOT AN SIMPLE INQUIRY. WE ' RE– >> NEARBY,. OBVIOUSLY– > > SIMPLY REFERRING IN RECOMMENDATION.
I SUGGEST JUST THOUGHT IF YOU'' RE MAKING A PRESENTATION. > > THANK YOU.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THAT. THANK YOU, ALDERMAN DEMONG.
I ' M TRYING TO DEVELOP IN ON YOUR. DISCUSSION.
I SIMPLY GOT IT TODAY.

IF YOU COULD– I WANT TO DEVELOP. KNOW THE RECOMMENDATION.SO I ASSUME THAT ' S UNDER TAB ONE,.
> > CORRECT. > > SO COULD WE GO THROUGH THOSE. TO BAN THIRD PARTY ADVERTISING AND MARKETING.
WHERE EXACTLY IN THE LAW ARE.
YOU REFERRING TO THIS.
>> FACTOR? HAVE YOU CONSIDERED THAT? > > I ASK FORGIVENESS, ALDERMAN. Mr. BARDSLY WILL BE ABLE TO TAKE CARE OF THAT
CONCERN IN HIS.
>> SUGGESTIONS. > > SO YOU AGREE WITH THE RECOMMENDED DISTRICTS OTHER THAN FOR.
THE ONES THAT YOU'' VE OUTLINED.
THERE.CAN YOU EXPLAIN

WHY. OR HAVE YOU DONE THAT SOMEPLACE.
> > OK. > > HOW ABOUT THE SECONDLY. SUGGESTION THAT YOU ' RE ASKING THAT THIS NOT BE EMBRACED.
AS WELL AS– IS ANOTHER PERSON GOING TO. TALK ABOUT THAT ONE
>>? > > YES. > > AS WELL AS WHAT ABOUT THE NEXT ONE? SECTOR ASKS FOR THIS NOT TO BE ADOPTED. WHY?
>> > > ONCE AGAIN– >> > > SAME>>? > > YES.
>> > > AS WELL AS THE EXACT SAME WITH THE LAST ONE? OK. DO YOU HAVE OTHER AMENDMENTS THAT YOU'' RE BRINGING ONWARD? WILL SOMEONE ELSE BE DEALING.
WITH THAT TOO? >> > > THEY WILL
>>. >'> IT ' S UNFORTUNATE'THAT WE ' VE. GONE THIS– I INDICATE, IT ' S NOT UNCOMMON FOR US TO HAVE COMBINED.
PRESENTATIONS AS WELL AS CONCERNS.
IF IT DOES TAKE LONGER THAN THE FIVE, around EACH– EVEN. SO THIS IS DIFFERENT PROCEDURE. IT TRULY DOESN'' T REACH THE IDEAL DISCUSSION CONCERNING THIS.
ISSUE.
>> > > AND ALSO I ASK FORGIVENESS FOR

THAT.IT WAS MY OBJECTIVE TO PRESENT THE.
ITEM AND ALSO PROVIDE ESSENTIALLY AN.
DESCRIBE AND AFTER THAT– >> > > THE AMOUNT OF OTHERS WILL BE.
TALKING?
>> > > WE HAVE 4. > > 4 OTHERS. SO I THINK WE ' LL ALL STAND,. ASK THE SAME QUESTIONS, WE WON'' T OBTAIN THE ANSWERS, WE'' LL TAKE A SEAT. AND AFTER THAT WE'' LL TAKE PLACE. >> IT ' S UNFORTUNATE. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: AS WELL AS,. UNFORTUNATELY, IF THAT ' S HOW THE. INDUSTRY INTENDED TO'DO IT, THAT ' S HOW THEY INTENDED TO DO THIS. WE WOULD HAVE TALKED ABOUT A.
COMBINED PRESENTATION.THAT IS AS IT IS.

RULES ARE IN AREA FOR A FACTOR. ALDERMAN POOTMANS? > > THANKS, YOUR WORSHIP.> TWO QUICK QUESTIONS, I ' M. INTERESTED IN THE COMMENT MADE IN PASSING AWAY THAT IF THERE ' S A. ISSUE WITH An INDICATION AS DETECTED. BY THE ELECTRONIC CAMERA, SOMEBODY WOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY PROBABLY. SWIFTLY TO CLEAR OUT AS WELL AS CONSIDER. IT. POTENTIALLY THERE MAY BE A. VERY SERIOUS ISSUE WITH THE.
INDICATOR FLASHING IRREGULARLY AS WELL AS I ' M WONDERING WHAT TYPE OF. CONTROLS ARE IN LOCATION TO SHUT.
DONE THE INDICATION OR CUSTOMIZE THE MESSAGING OR IF THERE IS. SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
IS THERE SOME CAR PROCESSES OR GUIDEBOOK PROCESS? > > THE SIGN IS SWITCHED OFF>>. PROMPTLY IF THERE ' S AN ALARM THAT CAN BE FOUND IN THAT THERE IS. SOMETHING ESSENTIALLY INCORRECT.
> > THERE ' S A DEFAULT THAT IT SIMPLY SHUTS DOWN. > > NEXT SPEAKER.
> > THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALDERMAN JONES.
> > THANK YOU, YOUR WORSHIP. I'SIMPLY HAVE ONE AFTER THAT.
> > DIGITAL POSTERS ARE THE KIND.
YOU SEE BELOW, DIGITAL SHOPPING MALL UNITS ARE An ITEM WE HAVE IN MALLS.
LIKE SOUTHCENTRE THAT ARE.
SMALLER, OBVIOUS KIOSK KIND THAT WILL CERTAINLY HAVE WAY LISTE HAVE-FINDINS.
WELL. SUNRIDGE MALL HAS THERM, FOR INSTANCE. AS WELL AS DIGITAL SPECTACULARS ARE THE.
LARGE– USUALLY 14 FEET HIGH BY 48 FEET LONG, SPECTACULARS. MUCH LARGER. WE ARE UNABLE TO– WE DO NOT BUILD THOSE IN CALGARY, BUT WE.
HAVE BUILT THOSE AT THE CALGARY.
FLIGHT TERMINAL ON AIRPORT TERMINAL TRAIL.AND YOU MAY

SEE THEM IN OTHER PLACES.
IN THE PROVINCE IN YOUR TRAVELING.
>> > > WE HAVE ONE IN CALGARY. WHERE IS IT?
>> > > ON AIRPORT TERMINAL PATH. AND WE ALSO HAVE ONE AT– SIMPLY SOUTH OF AIRDRIE ON HIGHWAY 2–.
>> >'> I ' VE SEEN THAT. JUST An ISSUE OF THE DIMENSION OF>> THE SIGN. > > EXACTLY. AMAZING BEING A STUNNING SIZE.
>> > > MANY THANKS, YOUR PRAYER. >> > THAT IS THE MANY COMMON KIND OF CHECK IN THE UNITED STATES,.
ACTUALLY. THAT WE WERE DISCUSSING. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN JONES. I ' M WONDERING IF WE CONTAINER REASSESS.
HOW THIS COMPONENT OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC HEARING IS WORKING AS WELL AS ASK THE.
PRESENTERS IF THEY WOULD LIKE A.
COMBINED DISCUSSION WHERE THEY EACH GET FIVE MINUTES. WE'' LL BE ABLE TO ASK ANY
OF. THE PRESENTERS THE INQUIRIES? DUE TO THE FACT THAT I TIN
SEE US REPEATING. THIS FOR EACH PRESENTER. WOULD YOU PLEASE– >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
ALDERMAN PINCOTT?
>> > > JOHN SMITH. THEY CAN LEAD TO THAT. I WAS SIMPLY GOING TO SAY THIS.
WAS A PROCEDURE WE WERE INFORMED TO FOLLOW.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
THERE'' S NO REAL CAPACITY FOR A JOINT DISCUSSION. WHAT WE CONTAINER DO IS ALDERMAN.
FARRELL IS SUGGESTING IS LISTEN TO EVERY ONE OF THEM AND AFTERWARDS ASK.
INQUIRIES AT THE END.
>> > > THAT ' S WHAT WE WERE DISCUSSING BUT I WANTED TO LET.
COUNCIL KNOW THIS IS THE.
PROCEDURE THE MANNER IN WHICH THE TREATMENT BYLAW MANDATES, NOT.
SOMETHING–.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: FRANKLY IT'' S A LITTLE BIT OFF.
YOU OUGHT TO HAVE FIVE MINUTES TO. EXISTING YOUR CASE.PERIOD. AND I COMPREHEND THAT YOU HAVE A. BUNCH OF VARIOUS SUBTLETIES THAT I WILL STATE THAT THIS IS A BIT.
NAVIGATING THE REGULATIONS THAT WE.
RUN UNDER. IF IT IS WHAT IT IS, YOU.
BROUGHT INDIVIDUALS, YOU HAVE.
> > WITH REGARD, YOUR PRAYER,. MANAGEMENT DOES I EXPECT THAT WOULD BE FINE TOO INCLUDING.
QUESTIONS BUT THAT WOULD KEEP United States.
HERE FOR QUITE SOME TIME, WOULD IT NOT, WITH REGARD.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: IN MY.
LIFE, SIR, I HAVE OFFERED TO THIS COUNCIL MANY WHEREBY MANY.
TIMES PRIOR TO I REACHED SIT OVER.
HERE. AS ALDERMAN COLLEY-URQUHART WELL.
KNOWS, WHEN SHE ASKS ME.
CONCERNS, WE CANISTER TAKE PLACE FOR AN HOUR. MY OPTIMUM WAS AN HOUR AND 20.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: LET'' S. SIMPLY BE CLEAR ON WHAT WE ' RE
. CHATTING ABOUT. IT ' S NOT BECAUSE OF IN WHICH WE.
> > I SAY SORRY PROFUSELY. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU.

>> > > I SAY SORRY ONCE MORE.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
IALDERMAN PINCOTT. >> > > THANKS. , if IT WOULD MAKE IT EASIER I.
WOULD MOVE A MOTION MOVEMENT WE ASK THE PRESENTERS SPEAKERS DO A COMBINED.
.
PRESENTATION OF NO EVEN MORE THAN 20.
> > SORRY, 15 MINS AFTER THAT? I WILL CERTAINLY MOVE THAT MOTION. SINCE THAT MEANS WE COULD GO.
AROUND– WE CANISTER DO IT AS A COUNCIL MOVEMENT.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: MADAME.
ON THAT ONE ARE WE CONCURRED? EXTREMELY WELL THEN. > > I HAVE ONE INQUIRY WHICH MOST LIKELY WILL CERTAINLY GO TO THE NEXT.
PERSON. AND ALSO IT'' S TYPE OF FOLLOWING UP ON WHAT ALDERMAN KEATING WAS ASKING.
ABOUT, COMPARING LOOKING AT THE.
LIGHTING OF DIFFERENT INDICATIONS. THESE ARE NOT THE ONLY INDICATIONS.
THAT ARE LIT. WE HAVE OTHER SIGNS THAT ARE LIT, BUT THEY'' RE LIT FROM THE. OUTSIDE. RIGHT? > > FROM THE EXTERIOR AND WE DO.
HAVE SOME BACK LIT INTERIOR.
INDICATORS. >> > > ARE THERE ANY AMBIENT LIGHT.
MEASUREMENT DEMANDS ON ANY.
OF THOSE INDICATORS? >> > > NOT TO MY UNDERSTANDING. NO.
>> > > DO YOU GAUGE THE LIGHT LEVELS COMING OFF THOSE INDICATOR?
>> > > WE HAVE NOT
>>. > > BECAUSE YOU DON ' T DEMAND TO.IT ' S NOT COMPONENT OF THE POLICY. OKAY. THANKS. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
WHY DON'' T WE TAKE THE NEXT
. AGAIN I ' LL ASK CLERK TO TRANSFORM
THE. > > YOUR PRAISE, MEMBERS OF.
COUNCIL, MY NAME'' S CHRIS. REBEKAS, DIRECTOR OF RENTING WITH PATTISON OUTDOOR.
ADVERTISING. I GUESS I CANISTER HANDLE THE CONCERNS AFTER. I'' LL GO INTO MY DISCUSSION. I'' M RIGHT HERE TO SPEAK TO– AND TO SPEAK AGAINST THE POLICIES THAT
ARE. OF TERRIFIC CONCERN TO THE.
MARKET. THE FIRST REGULATION ELIMINATES SIGNS.
AS A DISCRETIONARY USAGE IN C-CORE.
ONE, C-CORE TWO, INDUSTRIAL SIDE, SCRI DISTRICTS. THE 2ND REGULATION– SORRY, THE.
SECOND POLICY IS ABOLISHING THE INDICATIONS FROM 300 METRES FROM A.
BUILDING CONTAINING A HOME.
UNIT.AND 150 METRES

FROM FROM A DWEG.
UNIT IN THE CORE OF CALGARY,.
CITY OF CALGARY. AND ALSO THESE POLICIES ARE NOT.
RELAXABLE. THE LAST 2 I SIMPLY MENTIONED … [Indistinct] CANISTER'' T GO TO THE ALLURE BOARD AND.
SAY IF THE INDICATOR IS NOT EVEN VISIBLE, IF THERE'' S BUILDINGS IN.
BETWEEN A SIGN AS WELL AS THE. RESIDENTIAL, WE CONTAINER ' T ARGUE THAT INSTANCE. 3RD POLICY IS THE REQUIRED 14.
METRE PROBLEM. TODAY THE RULE IS 6 METRES. AND MAINTAIN IN MIND THIS IS TROUBLE.
FROM THE BUILDING LINE, NOT FROM THE EDGE OF THE ROADWAY. SO ON TOP OF THAT AS WE UNDERSTAND FROM.
THE SIDE OF THE ROAD THERE'' S OTHER TROUBLES BETWEEN THE SIDE. COULD ALREADY BE EXTENSIVE.
PROBLEMS ALREADY IN LOCATION. AS WELL AS THE 4TH REGULATION IS THE SEPARATION OF DIGITAL SIGNBOARD,.
3RD PARTY INDICATION WITH ELECTRONIC.
MESSAGE SIGN. SO ANY TYPE OF INDICATOR THAT HAS A.
LITTLE DIGITAL ELECTRONIC.
PART WOULD REQUIRE 300 METRE SEPARATION. AS WELL AS THE FINAL POLICY WHICH WOULD.
BE THE NEXT SPEAKER WILL ADDRESS IS THE REFRESH RATE. THAT'' S BEEN DISCUSSED A PAIR. TIMES AS'WELL. WE ' RE HERE TO DEMAND THAT THE 6. SECONDLY BE THE STANDARD AS CITIES IN. OTHER AREAS.IT WAS ONLY JUST RECENTLY EXPLAINED.
TO United States THAT LED ADMINISTRATION TO.
RECOMMEND THESE POLICIES THAT I'' M ADDRESSING. AS WELL AS AS MENTIONED, WE REMAIN IN.
ARGUMENT WITH THE TECHNIQUE ADMINISTRATION HAS TAKEN TO.
THESE MATTERS WHICH ARE EVEN MORE.
PROHIBITORY THAN REGULATORY CONSIDERING THESE ARE ONLY.
ACTING RULES. THESE POLICIES WILL SIGNIFICANTLY HINDER THE SECTOR AND ALSO THE COUNTLESS.
BUSINESSES AND ALSO CHARITIES WHICH.
USE THIS TYPE OF ADVERTISING AND MARKETING ADMINISTRATION WANTS TO PROHIBIT.
DIGITAL BILLBOARDS IN A NUMBER.
OF LAND USAGE DISTRICTS WHERE BILLBOARDS ARE NOW ENABLED. AS MENTIONED BEFORE, THESE ARE.
C-CORE 1, 2, SCRI. WE UNDERSTAND THE.
ADMINISTRATION'' S REASONING FOR. THIS IS THAT IN THE FIRST 2 DISTRICTS, C-CORE 1 and also twos.
THESE ARE PEDESTRIAN LOCATIONS AND.
ADMINISTRATION ARE ASSUMING OF BANNING ALL THIRD.
CELEBRATION INDICATORS FROM THEM IN FEE.
PROGRAM. THAT IS OVER THE NEXT 12 TO 18.
MONTHS AS WE MEET TO TESTIMONIAL THE.
BYLAW WHICH WILL ADDRESS INDICATIONS– ALL THIRD EVENT INDICATORS.
ALONG WITH DIGITAL SIGNS.
BEFORE YOU TODAY. MANAGEMENT REALLY FEELS THAT IF.
THEY ARE THINKING IN THAT.
DIRECTION, IT WOULD BE BEST NOT TO LET INDUSTRY PUT UP ANY.
DIGITAL BILLBOARDS WHILE THIS.
IF, TESTIMONIAL IS ONGOING AS IT WOULD THEN BE HARD TO OBTAIN THEM–.
THE BAN IS ESTABLISHED DOWN THE.
ROAD IT WOULD BE TOUGH TO OBTAIN THEM OUT. THEY ALSO GIVE A FEW OTHER.
FACTORS SUCH AS ESTHETICS FOR SUSTAINING SUCH A BAN NOW. I WANTED TO PROVIDE YOU A NUMBER OF.
INSTANCES OF IMPACT OF– SORRY, SIMPLY VOCALLY, C-CORE 1, 2s.
COMMON ROADWAYS THAT''
S NO. ZONINGS ARE FOUND ARE MACLEOD TRAIL AND 16th Opportunity. THOSE ARE HIGHWAYS THAT.
CURRENTLY ALLOW THIRD CELEBRATION ADVERTISING INDICATORS, FIGURE, SD.
IF YOU WILL CERTAINLY AND HAVE, billboards.
BEEN A, COMMON AREA YOU DISCOVER THESE SIGNS IN. OUR WORRY IS WE HAVE NOT BEEN.
ABLE TO TRANSFORM OR ADD TO OUR BILLBOARDS ON MACLEOD PATH AND ALSO.
16th AVENUES AND ALSO DIFFER.
THAT THESE KIND EVER ZONING NEED TO BE BANNED FROM IT. SCIR IS A ZONING THAT IS.
DEFINITELY FOR THE MANY COMPONENT RAILWAY CHARACTERISTICS, TRAIN.
LINES, RIGHT OF WAYS AND SIGNS.
MAY THERE TODAY.THE RESTRICTION OF A DIGITAL. SIGNBOARD, I ' LL MANAGE'THE.
2ND RULE HERE, WITHIN 300 METRES OF A BUILDING CONTAINING.
A RESIDENCE UNIT IS A CHALLENGE.
FOR United States. THERE IS ALREADY A POLICY IN LOCATION.
IN THE LAW THAT PROHINTS THE.
EFFECTS OF 3RD PARTY JOINS RESIDENTIAL AREAS. BY CHANGING THAT TO THE WORDS.
HOUSE UNIT OR BUILDING CONSISTING OF A HOUSE DEVICE, AND.
BY PRODUCTION THIS PROHIBITION NOT.
RELAXABLE, MANAGEMENT IS BROADENING OF THE RANGE OF THE.
POLICY AND CLAIMING IN NO.
SITUATIONS CAN THE IMPACT OF SUCH An INDICATOR WITHIN 300 METRES BE.
RESOLVED BY GROWTH PERMIT.
REVIEW WHATSOEVER.WE FUNDAMENTALLY DISAGREE WITH. THAT. SO ON THIS LAYOUT I ' M HIGHLIGHTING SOME SIGNS HERE ON. MACLEOD PATH In Between 42nd.
AND 45th method.
THIS IS SIMPLY AN INSTANCE OF.
THREE, FOUR 3RD PARTY SIGNS.
THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED, HAVE A LICENSE AND IF WE WERE TO.
METHOD THE CITY TODAY AND ALSO.
TRANSFORM ONE OF THOSE INDICATIONS TO A DIGITAL, THE CITY WOULD SAY NO.
SINCE THEY WOULD TAKE THE.
COMPASS FACTOR, DO THE 300 METRE AREA AS WELL AS SAY IF THERE'' S. ANY RESIDENTIAL WITHIN 300.
METRES OR A STRUCTURE ON MACLEOD TRAIL THAT HAS A RESIDENTIAL.
HOME ON TOP OF IT YO YOU WD.
BE ALLOWED. WHETHER IT'' S NOTICEABLE OR NOT, A.
BUFFER BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL AND.
INDUSTRIAL TODAY THIS WOULD NOT PERMIT ANY DIGITAL IN THIS AREA. THAT HAVE ALLOWED THIRD CELEBRATION IN.
THE PAST. ONCE AGAIN, IT TURNS OUT IN THIS SITUATION.
INDUSTRIAL TO THE WEST, WHEN.
AGAIN, ANY SIGNS WOULD BE UNTOUCHABLE FOR DIGITAL.
SIGNBOARD REGARDLESS IF THEY'' RE. IF RESIDENTIAL IS MUCH AWAY FROM, SEEN OR NOT AND REGARDLESS.
THIS INDUSTRIAL AREA. FURTHERMORE, IN THE TARGET MARKET TOO WE HAVE An ILLUMINATION DESIGNER.
FROM STANTEC THAT IS RIGHT HERE, WILL.
SAY A FEW WORDS AS WELL AS SHOW COUNCIL THAT THE LIGHT ACTORS FROM THESE.
INDICATIONS IS NOT An ELEMENT AS WELL AS IS.
LESSER DISTANCE OF A VARIABLE WHATSOEVER WHE WHEN YOU CONTRAST IT TO 0.
METRES. WHY IS THIS REGULATION PROPOSED AND WHY IN THIS FORM? EXISTING OF PROPOSED REGULATIONS TO.
WHICH WE DO NOT ITEM, THE EXISTING POLICIES TODAY WHICH.
SECURE RESIDENTIAL, AND THE.
SUGGESTED RULES WHICH A VARIETY OF THEM WE HAVE ALREADY ACCEPTED.
ARE EVEN MORE THAN SUFFICIENT TO.
ADDRESS ANY PERCEIVED INFLUENCES OF THESE SIGNS ON RESIDENTIAL AREAS.
OR RESIDENCE DEVICES. WHAWHAT THAT I IS WHAT THE ADVANCEMENT PERMIT PROCEDURE IS.
FOR. WHY TAKE THIS FAR FROM THE INDUSTRY IN THIS STYLE? THE THIRD GUIDELINE, THE 14 METRE.
TROUBLE AS MENTIONED …

AS MENTIONED TODAY, THE 6 METRES.
IS An OBSTACLE TYPICAL TODAY FROM.
A HOME LINE. SO ALREADY THERE'' S ALREADY A.
BARRIER FROM United States OFF THE STREET.
THEY'' RE PROPOSING TO BOOST. THAT TO 14 METRES.
BOARD IS KIND OF THE COMEBACK.
TO United States. THE DIFFICULTY WITH THE 14.
METRES, IS A NUMBER OF THINGS. ALL OF A SUDDEN THE SIGN– YOU if YOU GO THAT MUCH PROBLEM.
BEGIN QUESTIONING THE VISIBLITY.
OF THE SIGN. WHETHER IT'' S EVEN EFFICIENT WITH.
VARIOUS OTHER STRUCTURES AS WELL AS TREES.
REALLY DESTRUCTIVE TO OUR COMPANY. THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GUIDELINES.
WHICH WE DO NOT ITEM TO ARE MORE THAN ENOUGH TO ADDRESS.
ANY PERCEIVED IMPACT OF THESE.
INDICATIONS. THE CASE BY SITUATION EVALUATION OF.
THE IMPACT OF THE SIGN IS WHAT.
THE GROWTH PROCESS IS FOR. ONCE MORE, WHY TAKE THIS AWAY FROM.
United States? THANKS. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU, SIR AND I SHOULD CAUTION YOU.
THAT YOU'' VE TAKEN TEN OF THE FIFTEEN ALLOTTED MINUTES THERE. BUT I'' LL STOP THE TIMER FOR A.
SECONDLY AND RECOGNIZE ALDERMAN DEMONG.
>> >'> I ' M PLEASED TO INTRODUCE OUR.
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT COLLEGE CLASS FOR TODAY. THEY ARE 23 QUALITY 5 AS WELL AS 6.
STUDENTS FROM PRINCE OF WALES SCHOOL IN PARKLAND ACCOMPANIED.
BY THEIR TEACHER JENNIFER.
ENGLAND.THEIR EMPHASIS FOR

TODAY WILL. BE HOW DO OUR PAST AND
OFFERS. IMPACT OUR FUTURE? IF YOU WOULD PLEASE STAND TO BE. RECOGNIZED. [
PRAISE] AND SIMPLY TO ALLOW YOU ALL KNOW,. YOU ' RE NOW ON T.V.
>> > > MANY THANKS, ALL AND I'' M LOOKING ONWARD TO SEEING YOU IN MY.
> > EXCELLENT EARLY MORNING. MY NAME IS NICOLET AA McDONALD.
AS WELL AS I'' M THE DIRECTOR OF BUSINESS AT PATIS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING. I'' M RIGHT HERE TO SPEAK TO THE 10
.
CURRENTLY THE ADS CHANGE EVERY 6.
SECONDS. THE PLANNERS DID ACTUALLY DISCUSS THIS PROBLEM WITH INDUSTRY.
BUT THEY WERE DETERMINED THAT THE.
REFRESH PRICE BE 10 SECS. WE'' RE NOT EXACTLY SURE WHY SO.
TAKEN CARE OF ON THIS PRICE. IN THE UNITED STATE 40 ONLY TENUOUS THE 4 SECOND REFRESH RATE AS WELL AS THE.
REST USE IN BETWEEN EIGHT AND 10.
SECS. IN CANADA ALL MARKETS USE 10.
SECS AND EDMONTON HAVE.
APPROVED 6 SECONDS. THE TEN LOW-GRADE WHICH THE.
COORDINATORS WANT IS NOT SECTOR.
BASIC AS WELL AS IT USED BY ONLY THREE CANADIAN CITIES THAT WE.
KNOW OF, TORONTO, MONTREAL AND.
HALIFAX.THE 6 SECOND-RATE

ALLOWS. PATTISON TO ALLOW ONE SECONDLY PER. MINUTE TO NON-PROFIT CHARITIES FOR FREE. THIS IS GREATLY APPRECIATED AS. THE LETTERS IN OUR PRODUCT PROGRAM YOU. NEIGHBORHOOD EVENTS, DISTRESS UNIT. MEANS, UNITED WAY, GLENBOW MUSEUM, A RANGE OF CALGARY ARTISTS ARE.
ARE JUST A FEW WHO HAVE SBEFTED.
FROM OUR DAMAGE TALL BOARDS. SIMPLY THIS PAST CHRISTMAS THEY.
INCLUDED SAMARITAN'' S BAG TO.
AID WITH THE CHOLERA OUTFWLAEK HAITI OVER THE HOLIDAYS. THAT WAS AN INSTANT CRISIS.
BECAUSE OF THE, that WE WERE ONLY ABLE TO RESPOND TO.
DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND ALSO OUR.
DEDICATION TO PRESERVE ONE AREA TO PSA. IF THE REFRESH PRICE IS COMPETED TO.
WHERE THE PLANNERS WANT IT AT 10 SECONDS THIS TIME OF PROGRAM.
BECOMES ECONOMICALLY CHALLENGING.
TO DEAL. NROZ COMPELLING FACTOR TO ADJUSTMENT.
THE REFRESH RATE FROM THE.
MARKET CRITERIA OF 6 SECONDS AND ALSO INDUSTRY ASKED ASKS THE.
COUNCIL TO ACCEPT THE REFRESH.
RATE OF 6 SECONDS AS WELL AS REJECT THE 10 SECOND REFRESH PRICE REQUESTED.
BY THE ORGANIZERS. THANK YOU. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU. WE'' VE GOT ONE EVEN MORE, I BELIEVE? >> > > EXCUSE ME?
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I JUST.
SAID WE'' VE GOT ANOTHER PERSON? >> > > YOUR PRAYER AS WELL AS COUNCIL MY.
NAME IS BRUCE NELLIGAN, THE.
MANAGER OF HEAD OF STATE AT V WATT CONSULTING. WE'' VE BEEN DEALING WITH THE.
INDUSTRY OVER THE PAST MONTHS.I ' VE

RIGHT HERE TO RESPONSE ANY.
TECHNOLOGICAL CONCERNS ABOUT THE.
BILLBOARDS OR ANY ASPECTS AS THEY RELATE TO SAFETY AND SECURITY.

> > AND ALSO THAT ' S ON FROM WHAT I.
UNDERSTAND FEDERAL LAND NOT SUBJECT TOPIC THE CITY. > > WITHIN REASON WE AGREE. > > ONE OF OUR GREAT WORRIES. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: AS WELL AS,. > > ON AIRPORT TERMINAL ROUTE.> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK YOU. WAS THERE ONE MORE, SORRY?
THERE'' S FOUR. >> >'I ' M SHAHEEN, A LIGHTS DESIGNER.
I HAVE DONE A RESEARCH STUDY FOR AMONG THE EXISTING DIGITAL WORLDS AT 9th Opportunity And Also 5th Road AND I ' LL MORE THAN HAPPY TO RESPONSE NIL QUESTIONS. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK YOU QUITE. WE WILL MOST LIKELY TO QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL, THEN FOR ANY/OR EVERY ONE OF
> > WELL, Mr. BRDSLY WERE YOU STILL GOING TO PRESIDE? > > I JUST HAD THE SUMMARY. RATHER OF SAYING ANYTHING I.
WONDER MARVEL YOU WOULD ALLOW ME TO.
PLACE IT UP ON THE EXPENSES. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: YOU.
COULD SAY IT. COUNCIL ' S TIME.
> > THIS IS SIMPLY THE SUMMARY,. PARAGRAPH 1 IS WHAT THE INDUSTRY WOULD LIKE SEE TRANSFORMED AS WELL AS THE. TALL SIZED PARTS ARE SIMPLY.
THE REASONS FOR IF.YOU ' VE HEARD ALL THESE BEFORE.
ANYWAY SO I'' M NOT GOING
TO. >> BELABOR IT. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: ARE. MOTIFS THE ONES THAT ARE IN THE.
PRESENTATION THAT WAS HANDED O OUT–.
>> > > RATHER WELL EXCEPT THERE'' S. 2 ADDITIONAL ONES TO THIS. WHEN WE GAVE THE PRESENTATION.
PRODUCTS OUT, WE DIDN'' T REALIZE. THE CSRI STRICT WAS IN THAT BUNCH SO WE HAD TO ADD THAT. THE ONLY OTHER ONE THAT'' S. DIFFERENT IS I ASSUME WE HAD A BETTER CONSIDER THE 300m.
SPLITTING UP FOR DIGITAL SIGNS,. SUGGESTING THE ELECTRONIC ESIGN COURSES WHICH IS THE ON PREMISES. INDICATOR, TO A BILLBOARD. AS WELL AS THAT WE HAVE PERTAIN TO CONCLUDE IS A POINT THAT WE.
WOULD LIKE TO SEE RESEARCHED MORE.
WHICH'' S BEEN ADDED.FOR COUNCIL'' S INFO, EXTREMELY,.
EXTREMELY RAPIDLY, THE CURRENT. GUIDELINES FOR 3RD CELEBRATION INDICATIONS WEAR ' T HAVE
ANY SPLITTING UP. FROM THESE KINDS OF SIGNS. BUT THERE IS A 30m SEPARATION FROM AN IDENT INDICATION. THE RECOMMENDATION PERSONNEL MAKING.
TEMPTCLASS INDICATION AND ALSO THAT'' S. SOMETHING WE THINK NEEDS A LITTLE MORE FUNCTION SO THAT'' S BEEN. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
ALDERMAN
LOWE? > > THANK YOU.
THE GROUP UP THERE … Mr. REBE REBECCUS, LE BOIL BOARD THAT WAS.
IN YOUR INITIAL DISPLAY SCREEN, YOU.
YOUR– THE FIRST VIDEO YOU INSTALL ON THERE, HOW FAR WAS THAT–.
WHAT WAS THE PROBLEM OF THAT.
INDICATOR? >> > > SO I ' M GOING SURMISE BELOW
. FROM MY RECOLLECTION, WE DON'' T. HAVE THE SITE PLAN WITH United States, IT'' S AN 80km/h Highway, McKNIGHT
. BLVD AROUND. THERE'' S AN EXTENSIVE OBSTACLE ALREADY BECAUSE OF THE ROAD,.
McKNIGHT BLVD IS A LAWN.
BLVD, APPROXIMATELY THE FENCING. AND AFTERWARDS WE'' RE COLLECTION BACK FROM THE
.
FROM THE RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY LINE WE ' RE ABOUT 3 TO 6m FROM THE PROPERTY. THERE'' S A. SETBACK OF THE
GRASS YARD. WE ' RE QUITE FAR FROM McKNIGHT BOULEVARD HIGHWAY.
AS WELL AS IF YOU ADDED THE TURF BOULEVARD SET BACK AND YOU WENT.
IN FROM THE FENCE PROPERTY LINE.
Another person 14m, YOU WOULD BE IN THE CENTER OF THE sign and the lot.
WOULD BE VIRTUALLY INEFFECTIVE.
DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT'' S SO FAR FROM THE ROADWAY WAY.
>> > > BUT THE PICTURE HE SHOULD.
REVEALED US TO YOUR RECOLLECTION, WHAT WAS WHATEVER THE BOULEVARD.
SIZE WAS AND ALSO 3 TO 6m–.
>> > > FROM THE FENCING, YEAH.

>> > > AND ALSO THE SFED ON McKNIGHT.
BLVD THEN YOU STATE.
IS 80 SDMRIKS >> > > 80km/h, CORRE CORRECT.
>> > > I REQUIRED TO UNDERSTAND FROM.
WHOMEVER THE RELATIONSHIP IN BETWEEN RATE AS WELL AS SETBACK FOR.
THIRD CELEBRATION SIGNS. AS WELL AS I'' M GOING BACK TO THE TABLE THAT WAS PUT UP BY.
TRANSPORTATION, WHICH OBVIOUSLY,.
WAS REALLY RELATED TO if I UNDERSTOOD THE PROOF PROPERLY.
MY ABILITY TO RECOGNIZE A.
HIGHWAY SIGN, TO READ IT, TO TAKE THE RESTORATIVE ACTIVITY.
ESSENTIAL TO ABIDE BY.
WHATEVER THAT INDICATION MAY BE INSTRUCTING ME TO DO, INCLUDING.
SOME DECISION TIME AS WELL AS IF I WANT.
TO OBTAIN OFF THE ROADWAY AT THAT POINT. SO IS THERE A CORRESPONDING.
RESEARCH WITH RELATION TO DIGITAL COSTS–.
OBVIOUSLY YOU DESIRED THEM READ, SO.
THAT THERE'' S REACHED BE SOMETHING IN
>> THERE. > > YURNGS VIA COUNCILLOR.
LOWE, THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE SPEED AS WELL AS THE PLACEMENT OF.
THE INDICATIONS IS SOMETHING THAT CAME.
OUT OF THE WORK THAT WE HAD BEEN DOING IN BEHALF OF THE.
ADVERTISING SECTOR AS WELL AS WORKING.
THERE ISN'' T A LOT OF STUDY. NRERTS THE HIGHWAY, THAT IT'' S. LESS SAFE OR– THERE REALLY ISN'' T A GREAT DEAL OF.
DESIGNER TO SAY WHETHER IT ' S APPRECIATE UNSAFE. THERE ' S BEEN A WHOLE LOT OF RESEARCH STUDY.
ADVERTISING SIGNS TO SAFETY. SO TO REACT TO THE CITY'' S DEMAND TO PERFORM A SAFETY AND SECURITY RECORD ON.
A SPECIFIC INDICATION, WE STARTED.
CONSIDERING SOME OF THE ENGINEERING METHODS THAT WE.
USE FOR THE PLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC.
OF WEBSITE TRAFFIC SIGNALS, ONE OF THE. POINTS THAT WE LOOK AT IS THE QUIT SITE RANGE, WHICH IS.
YOU ' RE GOING, THE LONGER IT TAKES FOR YOU TO STOP. THE STOP IN SIGHT RANGE AND THE RANGE THAT YOU SAW ON IN. CAME FROM WAS THE STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE WHICH CHANGES AS.
IT WASN ' T TO DO WITH OUTDOOR–. YOU RECOGNIZE, THE OUTDOOR MARKETING SIGNS PER SE, BUT IT.
PUT ON THIS PARTICULAR TOP TAKE SHOT TO HELP United States IN. FIGURING OUT WHERE THE INDICATION COULD.
BE POSITIONED. > > DID YOU FIND THAT–.
WAS THE CONTRAST USEFUL? > > WELL, IT WAS SOMETHING THAT WE USED TO TAKE A LOOK AT> SPECIFIC. WEBSITES AS WELL AS TO SAY WHETHER IT WAS. IN THE PRIMARY CONE OF VISION OR THE SECONDARY
CONE OF VISION. BUT IT WAS SOMETHING THAT WE. CONSIDERED BUT WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS
USEFUL IN–. YOU UNDERSTAND, IN FIGURING OUT THE.
PRECISE POSITIONING OF IT, IT ' S QUESTIONABLE. > > O.K..
ROADWAY, ADMITTEDLY ADVERTISING IS TO GET MY ATTENTION TO READ THE. INDICATION. AND ALSO I ' M WONDERING, DID YOU CHECK OUT ANY STUDIES THAT SAYS THAT MY. CONCENTRATE ON MY PRIMARY FUNCTION IS. SIDETRACKED BY A SIGNBOARD OVER RIGHT HERE, BE IT LIT OR OTHERWISE?
> > THERE ' S BEEN A GREAT DEAL OF. RESEARCH STUDY ON THE DRIVING>> MARKET AS WELL AS SIGNS, BILLBOARDS AS WELL AS HOW IT. TYING BILLBOARDS TO SAFETY AND SECURITY, ROAD.
I BELIEVE THE INDUSTRY AND ALSO THE.

RESEARCH STUDY SETTLES ON, IS THAT GLANCE OF LONGER THAN TWO.
SECONDS COULD BE PROBLEMATIC IN. TERMS OF ROADWAY SECURITY PERSPECTI POINT OF VIEW. THERE HAS
BEEN RESEARCHSTUDY THAT HAS BEEN DONE THAT SAYS THAT, GENERALLY, AN OUTDOOR.
MARKETING INDICATOR OR BILLBOARD. WILL CERTAINLY ATTRACT A GLANCE OF ABOUT A HALF A SECONDLY TO ONE SECOND.
TO MAKE SURE THAT ' S THE SORT OF RESEARCH. THAT ' S BEEN DONE, AS WELL AS THAT ' S WHAT WE
' VE BEEN USING IN STIPULATIONS.'OF FUNCTIONING'WITH ADMINISTRATION.
ON THE APPLICATIONS FOR THESE SIGNS
. > > CORRECT. > > WITH REGARD TO THE AMBIENT.
LIGHTING PROBLEM, AS WELL AS I'' M HARKE. HARKENING BACK TO– YOU'' LL REMEMBER WE HAD A PROBLEM UP IN.
SIMON'' S VALLEY WITH An INDICATION THAT. WAS BOTTOM-LIT THAT WAS PROBLEMATIC. IS THAT ILLUMINATION CONTROLLED AT.
ALL OTHER THAN OFF/ON? AS WELL AS HOW DOES IT RELATE IN.
RELATIONSHIP TO THE TYPE OF LIGHT–.
AMBIENT LIGHTING THAT WOULD HAPPEN FROM A DIGITAL BILLBOARD,.
WHICH MANAGES YOU'' RE PROPOSING.
ON IT? >> > > SORRY, FOR CLARIFICATION, SO.
THE FIRST PART OF THE INQUIRY.
IS REGARDING WHETHER– WHAT KIND OF EFFECT– WHAT.
CHANGES THE ILLUMINATION CAN DO FOR.
DIGITAL, HOW IT'' S CHANGED? >> > > NO, MY CONCERN IS IF–.
I'' M USING THAT– I PUT ON'' T KNOW. IF YOU REMEMBER THE ONE WE BROUGHT UP IN SIMON'' S VALLEY, OVERLOOKED.
SAGE HILL THERE. YOU RECOGNIZE, THAT WAS– DURING THE NIGHT IT WAS JUST A GLARING.
INTENSE LIGHT. WHAT I RECOGNIZE IS THE ELECTRONIC INDICATIONS, YOU CAN CHANGE THAT DOWN,.
IS THAT CORRECT?
>> > > THAT IS CORRECT AS WELL AS I DO HAVE OUR LIGHTS EXPERT TO.
> > WELL, SO WHAT THEY'' VE DONE–. ACTUALLY THAT ' S AN EARLIER QUESTION, SOMEBODY ASKED THE.
EXISTINGING BILLBOARDS TODAY AND DIGITAL. TODAY FOR REQUIREMENT BILLBOARDS.
WHICH USE LIGHTS THAT CAN BE USED AT THE BASES OF THE SIGNS,.
RADIATING UPWARDS OR THE TOP OF.
THE INDICATOR SHINING DOWNWARD, THAT'' S PHYSICAL LIGHT ONTO THE.
SIGN SURFACE OF A PAPER, VINE I.
WILL BILLBOARD.THAT ' S ALWAYS BEEN APPROVED. THEY ' VE NEVER BEEN MEASURED AS WELL AS. THE REGULATIONS– AS WELL AS THERE ' S NO GUIDELINES IN LOCATION IN. THE LAW THAT NEEDS CERTAIN.
LIGHTING REGULATES ON THOSE EXISTING
INDICATORS. WITH DIGITAL BILLBOARDS, MOST OF US. IDENTIFY THAT THE INDUSTRY, THE CITY, MANUFACTURERS RECOGNIZE,. INDEED, THESE SIGNS ARE–.
TEND TO BE MORE INTENSE SO WHAT THE ADMINISTRATION DID WAS THEY. SPOKE TO MANUFACTURERS,.
SURPASS A CERTAIN AMOUNT– IN THIS INSTANCE IN THE LAW, IT'' S 500. HOW IT'' S DETERMINED IS ACTUALLY. I ' LL
FINISH THE QUESTION INQUIRYAS WELL AS
THAT BUT UNLIKE CRITERION.
BILLBOARDS, THIS IS THE VERY FIRST TIME– AND WE RECOGNIZE THAT.
DUE TO TECHNOLOGY, THERE IS.
LIGHTS LEVELS IN POSITION. AND ALSO ALSO BEFORE THESE RULES WERE.
TALKED ABOUT OR PASSED, OUR SIGNS.
HAVE ALREADY BEEN PUT VIA THE PEEL BOARD ADS I CLAIMED.
EARLIER AS WELL AS IT WAS DONE.
SEPARATELY, THEY MEASURED THE INDICATIONS AND ALSO IN REALITY OUR SIGNS WILL.
HAVE ALREADY NEIL THOSE.
GUIDELINES ALSO BEFORE WE STARTED DETERMINING THEM. SO THE DIGITAL COSTS DISORDERS.
BOARDS YOU SEE FULFILL THOSE STANDARDS THAT REMAIN IN COUNCIL.
PRIOR TO YOU TODAY AS WELL AS AS YOU CONTAINER.
SEE IN OUR ARGUMENTS, THIS IS NOT BROUGHT UP TODAY, WE'' RE
NOT. INTERESTED IN THE LIGHTS.
LEVELS AS BROUGHT FORTH BY PAD EMERGENCIES. THAT DROPPED SUBSTANTIALLY SINCE.
WE FIRST BEGAN NEGOTIATIONS BUT WE FELT IT WAS A NECESSARY.
CONCESSION AND ALSO WE ACCEPTED THE.
FACT THAT THE LEVELS WERE REDUCED. AND I'' LL DESCRIBE–>>. > > SORRY, BEFORE YOU GO AND ALSO MAYBE YOUR ILLUMINATION EXPERT CANISTER.
TELL ME THIS BUT WHAT'' S
THE. RESULT OF– I GUESS I NEED TO KNOW WHAT A NIT IS BUT WHAT'' S. THE EFFECT OF THE LOWERED.
ILLUMINATION AS YOU MOVE FAR FROM 100m, 150m, 200m, 300m, SUPPOS.
ALLEGEDLY INTO A RESIDENTIAL.
LOCATION? DOES THAT QUANTITY OF LIGHT–.
AT WHAT POINT DOES IT END UP BEING.
UNDISCERNABLE? >> > >'IT ' S CONSIDERABLE AS WELL AS YEAH,.
THE QUESTION YOU'' RE ASKING IS. WHERE DOES THE AMBIENT LIGHT KIND OF SWALLOW UP THE INDICATION
.
CONTEXT VERSUS RURAL, FREEWAY.
CONTEXT WHICH IS WHERE SIGNS HAVE LITTLE AMBIENT LIGHTING TO.
TAKE ON OUT THERE. BUT IT DOES DROP SUBSTANTIALLY AND ALSO I'' VE GOT SOME NUMBERS RIGHT HERE.
FROM OUR ILLUMINATION PROFESSIONAL TO.
GIVE United States PROVIDE YOU AN SUGGESTION OF HOW FAR THEY DROP DOWN AND WHAT.
DEGREE IS PROBABLY A GOOD.
MEASUREMENT LEVEL FOR An INDICATOR TO ACTION AT.
>> > > POSSIBLY I COULD ASK YOU, JUST.
FOR MY HELP, TELL ME WHAT A NIT IS. GIVE ME SOMETHING–.
HOW MANY NITS HAVE WE GOT IN BELOW CURRENTLY?
>> > > A NIT IS A CANDLE PER METERS.
SQUARE F YOU'' RE LOOKING AT ANY LIGHT SETUP OR IT COULD BE.
EVEN LIKE FROM SOMETHING–.
IF YOU'' RE LOOKING AT ANY LIGHT, THE LIGHT UPCOMING FROM THAT. SOURCE IS THE ILLUMINATION. > > SO– AND ONCE MORE FOR ME–.
I'' M SORRY, YOUR PRAISE, FOR ME. TO TRY TO PUT IT IN POINT OF VIEW, ENOUGH LIGHT FROM A FLASHLIGHT.
FOR A METER FOR ME TO READ A.
WEB PAGE IN A 12 TYPEFACE, THE NUMBER OF NITS WOULD I REQUIRED TO PERFORM THAT?
>> > > THERE ARE 2 POINTS. ONE IS BRIGHT NELLS AND ALSO THE VARIOUS OTHER IS FOOT CANDLE LIGHT LEVELS SO.
WHEN YOU ARE SPEAKING–.
LIKE, WHEN YOU WANT TO READ SOMETHING, YOU WOULD REQUIREMENT.
SOMETHING THAT'' S REFLECTIVE FROM.
THE ANALYSIS PRODUCT SO THAT WOULD BE–.
THAT IS MEASURED IN–.
, if YOU DESIRED TO READ SOMETHING AT NIGHT AS WELL AS THE LIGHTS DEGREE.
.
DEPENDS UPON THE PERSON, WHETH.
WHETHER– WE HAVE TO MAKE CERTAIN THEY CAN READ.
10 TIMES LESS LIGHT THAN I TIN,.
AND ALSO AS WE AGE WE NEED MORE LIGHT SO IT''
S–. IT VARIES. BUT GENERALLY, IF YOU INTENDED TO READ SOMETHING, 200 OR 250 LUX.
> > I JUST HAVE TO FACTOR OUT THAT ALDERMAN PINCOTT IS PERISHING TO. > > I SIMPLY–
. > > LET ME SIMPLY HELP.NITS IS A WAY OF MEASURING.
> > YOU MEASURE
>> INTENSITY IN >> A. DIFFERENT MEASUREMENT BY WHAT ' S. DOWN RIGHT HERE SO YOU CONTAINER HAVE'An EXTREMELY INTENSE– EXTREMELY BRILLIANT RESOURCE IN. THE CORNER OF THAT SPACE WHICH.
FAIRLY LOW NITS BY HIGH FOOT CANDLES SO NITS IS PERCEIVED. BRIGHTNESS, WHICH WE MEASURE.
DOWN RIGHT HERE IS LIGHT I STRENGTH, SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. WHICH SHE TRANSCRIBED ATTEMPTED TO.
EXPLAIN AROUND FOOT CANDLES SO IT ' S TWO DIFFERENT THINGS THAT. YOU ' RE MEASURING.
THE'BRIGHTNESS– ILLUMINATIONS WHICH IS–.
ILLUMINATION, WILLS THE RESOURCE–.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: AS WELL AS FIY, FOR THOSE IN THE GALLERY IF.
YOU'' RE WONDERING ABOUT THAT.
EXCHANGE ALDERMAN PINCOTT IN HIS PREVIOUS LIFE WAS A REALLY WELL.
PROMINENT AND MULTIPLE.
PRIZE-WINNING ILLUMINATION DESIGNER SO HE HAS SOME PROFICIENCY IN THIS.
LOCATION–.
> > O.K.,'I ' M–. GO AHEAD. > > I LIKEWISE HAVE 35 REPORTS, IF– WITH YOUR CONSENT IF IT COULD.
BE DISTRIBUTED. POSSIBLY THAT WOULD MAKE THINGS EASIER.
>> > > THAT ' S PENALTY, THANK YOU.
>> > > THANKS REALLY MUCH.

>> > > MY LAST QUESTION HAS TO DO.
WITH THE CONE THAT WE SEE BEING.
UTILIZED REGARDLESS OF TOP TOMB. YOU UNDERSTAND, IF WE HAVE–.
I BELIEVE BARLOW TRAIL, YOUR.
INSTANCE OF BARLOW PATH IS IS A TRULY GREAT ONE WHERE THE INDICATIONS.
GET ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ROADWAY.
THE RESIDENTIAL IS ON THE WEST SIDE, BUT SIGNIFICANTLY BELOW.
THE ROADWAY. — BUT IF I PUNS THE PROPOSITION PROPERLY, BECAUSE WITHIN 300m.
IT WOULD NOT MAY TODAY. DO I UNDERSTAND THAT– IS THAT THE NUX OF YOUR PROBLEM.
WITH THAT SAID?
>> > > THAT ' S SPECIFICALLY CORRECT. IT IS A CHALLENGE FOR United States TO.
STEP IN SOME Place 300m.
AND ALSO IF THERE'' S A BUILDING SYSTEM WOULD BE PROHIBITED SO BLACKFOOT.
TRAIL, MACLEOD TRAIL, THOSE KIND.
OF ROADWAYS WOULD BE PROHIBITED. >> > > NOW, IF THE–.
IT APPEARED TO THINK–.
AS WELL AS IT APPEARED TO THINK TO ME THAT THEY WERE ASSUMING THAT ALL.
SIGNS WERE PLACED AT RIGHT.
ANGLES TO THE ROAD. IT'' S MY EXPERIENCE THAT VERY FEW.
ARE, IN FACTOR OF TRUTH. YOU OFTEN TEND TO ANGLE YOUR SIGNS TO MAKE SURE THAT ONCOMING TRAFFIC CONTENDS.
THAT– YOUR ADVERTISER HAS A.
CHANCE IN THE ONCOMING WEB TRAFFIC, I'' LL PUT IT THIS WAY. SO EXISTS ANY PROVISION WITHIN.
THE BYLAW AS YOU READ IT TO CUT OFF THAT ARC LIMITING IT TO THE.
ROADWAY, PARTICULARLY IN WHICH YOU.
HAVE A TOPOGRAPHICAL FUNCTION THAT DROPS AWAY, OR CONVERSELY A.
CLIMB?
>> > > NO, AS WELL AS THAT'' S WHY WE'MADE IT A SOLID CASE AND WHY WE ' RE BELOW.
TODAY IN CON TIG SIR SIMILAR TO THIS.

SINCE OF THAT TYPE OF RULE.THE CHALLENGE IS TWOFOLD. ONE, THERE IS NO CONTINGENCY FOR.
POPPOGRAPHY, STRUCTURE, TREES AHEAD, ANY TYPE OF BARRIER.
BETWEEN THE INDICATION AND 300m IS.
TAKEN OUT OF THE FORMULA. AND ALSO SECONDLY, IT'' S NOT RELAXABLE. DOUBLE WHAIM FOR THE INDUSTRY.
— WHAT AMY FOR THE SECTOR.
>> > > I THINK I FIRST MET YOU WHILE.
I WAS ON DA RECOMMENDATION I UNDERSTAND ABOUT RELAXABLE. MY LAST QUESTION IS IN YOUR.
POSITIONING OF YOUR CURRENT INDICATORS, YOUR STANDARD SIGNS, THE RATE.
OF THE STREET A CONSIDERATION.
IN ANY WAY? >> > > NO, THE BYLAW TODAY HAS NO.
ADDRESS–.
DOES NOT ADDRESS– THERE'' S NO ISSUE WHETHER THE.
SPEED RESTRICTION IS 50, 60, 70 OR 80.
KILOMETRES. TODAY THEY HAVE PROBLEMS, ZONING.
AND AS THEY DID IN EDMONTON,.
THEY SIMPLY INCLUDED DIGITAL BILLBOARDS TO THE EXISTING POLICIES.
AS WELL AS SAY WHERE BILLBOARDS EXIST.
TODAY, DIGITAL IS FINE TOO, JUST TWO PROVISIONS PLEASE, NO VIDEO.
OR ACTIVITY AS WELL AS CONTROL THE.
ILLUMINATION AND ALSO WE'' RE HAPPY.SO HERE THEY'' VE TAKEN IT BEYOND.
THAT AND ALSO THEY'' VE LIMITED.
SPECIFIC ZONINGS, THEY HAVE A HUGE SEPARATION, ET CETERA SO IT.
IS QUITE DIFFERENT.
>> > > OKAY. THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU SIGNIFICANTLY, ALDERMAN LOWE. I'' M GOING TO REFRAIN–.
THE PUNS WRITE THEMSELVES. ALDERMAN JONES? >> > > Mr. RUBECUS IN REFERRAL.
NUMBER 2, 150m FROM A HOUSE.
URNGTS YOU PUT ON'' T REALLY ADDRESS WHAT YOUR ISSUES ARE REGARDING THE.
DISTANCE. IS IT THAT YOU COULD BE NEAR A RESORT, IS THAT CLASS THE AS A.
HOME UNIT ON A MAJOR ROADWAY? IS IT A WORRY THAT THE RESIDENCE DEVICE MAY BE BEHIND.
YOU AS WELL AS THE SIGN REMAINS IN FRONT AND ALSO.
IT'' S NOT BEAMING BACK THERE, SO THAT THE ISSUE OR–.
>> > > COMPONENT OF IT, YES. THE CONCERN IS– AND TO CLARIFY THE 300m FROM A DWELLING SYSTEM.
AND 150m FROM A HOUSE SYSTEM.
ARE THE SAME.IT ' S JUST THE CONTEXT, WHERE. THE 150m Guideline THAT YOU REFERRED.
TO, WITH THE CHAIR, THROUGH THE MAYOR IS FOR THE DOWNTOWN.
CORE. AND OUR CONCERN FOR THAT IS, OBVIOUSLY, THE CORE IS HEAVILY.
CREATED AS WELL AS TO PUT A SIGN UP.
ON A WALL SURFACE, AS AN EXAMPLE, WE JUST OBTAINED AUTHORIZATION TO PUT UP An INDICATION.
AGAINST THE INTERNATIONAL HOTEL,.
UP VERSUS THE WALL OF THE BUILDING BUT IF IT'' S A. RESIDENTIAL NEXT DOOR DO THAT.
BUILDING, ALTHOUGH THE INTERNATIONAL HOTEL IS IN.
BETWEEN THE SIGN AND ALSO THE APARTMENT,.
IT WOULD BE– IT WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED BASED ON.
THE GUIDELINES TODAY IS THE 150m, OUR.
WORRY EXISTS COULD BE– IT COULD BE DEVELOPED, THE INDICATOR.
MAY NOTTEN VISIBLE WHATSOEVER IN.
THE CORE DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT'' S SO HEAVILY CONCENTRATED ADVANCEMENT WISE. OUTSIDE THE CORE IS THE 300m.
300m SET BACK BUT WHICH WOULDN ' T. BE ABLE TO SEE THE INDICATOR IF– NO ISSUE HOW YOU TRIED
, EVEN IF. > > CORRECT, BECAUSE OUR SIGNS– ONCE AGAIN–. SORRY
>>, NOT AGAIN BUT IN TODAY ' S. RULES OUR HEIGHT IS MAXIMUM OPTIMUM 26 FEET SO WE ' RE NOT.
OPTIMUM 26 FEET SO CONSEQUENTLY. OF THAT YOU DROP MACLEOD ROUTE, 16th Opportunity, YOU PLACE A. COMMERCIAL BUILDING BETWEEN OUR. INDICATION AND ALSO RESIDENTIAL, OUR INDICATION IS
NOT VISIBLE. > > I NOTICED HERE IN YOUR 4. RECOMMENDATIONS THAT YOU HAVE YOU ' RE ASKING> INDUSTRY– OR.
YOU ' RE ASKING United States NOT TO TAKE ON. THESE BUT YOU ' RE NOT PROVIDING United States AN CHOICE OF WHAT YOU WANT.
EMBRACED– OR A MINIMUM OF I HAVEN ' T. SEEN IT LOOKING THROUGH THIS BOOK. > > SORRY, BEST WAY TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT.
IS ACTUALLY THESE ONES RIGHT HERE.
>> > > SORRY, I CAN ' T SEE
THAT. > > IT ' S SIMPLY NOT SIMPLY TAKE ON,. IT ' S TO DELETE>>. SO WHEN THEY SUGGEST THAT.
THERE ' S 4 ZONINGS TODAY,.
C-CORD 1, C-CHORD 1, SCI AND INDUSTRIAL EDGE, THE BILLBOARDS. ALLOWED TODAY IN THOSE AREAS.
WE ' RE ASKING FOR THEM TO
BE'DELETED FROM THE BYLAW. RECOMMENDATION BEFORE YOU TODAY. AS WELL AS AFTER THAT THE REMAINDER OF THE REGULATIONS–. THAT ' S AN EXAMPLE OF'ONE SO. WE ' RE ASKING FOR DELETE.THE SECOND RULE, AGAIN 300m,.

BECAUSE 300m, 150m SEPARATION,. THAT ' S THE 2ND GUIDELINE, WE ' RE ASKING THAT TO'BE DELEAD,. NOT-FOR-PROFIT TOOK ON BUT TO BE. REMOVED FOR THE FACTORS OFFER IN THE REPORT AND AS MENTIONED, THE. SPLITTING UP–.
THIS IS OUR– THE SPLITTINGS UP ARE CRITICAL AND ALSO.
INFLUENCE OUR INDICATION INDUSTRY. THE THIRD GUIDELINE WE'' RE ASKING IS TO CHANGE FROM 10 SECONDS TO 6.
SECONDS. THE 4TH REGULATION IS ANOTHER PERSON REMOVAL, THE 300m SEPARATION.
FROM DIGITAL TO ELECTRONIC SIGN. ONCE AGAIN TO REMOVE. AND ALSO AGAIN–.
AS WELL AS THE FINAL RULE IS THE 14m.
TROUBLE, AGAIN TO REMOVE. THERE'' S ALSO PROVISION IN THE.
LAW FOR 6m SETBACK TO WE'' RE. ASKING IT TO BE DELETED FROM 14 TO 6 SO IT'' S MOSTLY DELETIONS.
AS WELL AS ONE TRANSFORM FROM 10 SECS.
TO 6 SEC. THE OTHER 4 ARE STRAIGHT.
DELETIONS.
>> > > O.K.. I HAVE ONE QUESTION FOR YOUR.
ILLUMINATION INDIVIDUAL. AS WELL AS IT WAS An INQUIRY BASED ON WHAT ALDERMAN LOWE HAD ASKED. THERE HAS BEEN RESEARCH STUDIES PERFORMED IN.
BETWEEN ACCIDENTS AND
CARS OR–. > > ACTUALLY, THERE ARE– THIS SPECIFIC SUBJECT IS REALLY.

> > SO I ' M GOING SURMISE RIGHT HERE
. > > THERE ' S BEEN A GREAT DEAL OF. > > THAT ' S EXACTLY CORRECT. > > SORRY, I TIN ' T SEE
THAT. > > IT ' S SIMPLY NOT SIMPLY EMBRACE,.THERE ARE NUMEROUS STANDARDS AVAILABLE BASED ON REMOVAL
ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF NORTH
AMERICA SO WHAT WE HAVE DONE IS WE HAVE DONE A RESEARCH OF THE
EXISTING DIGITAL BOARD WHICH ARE
FROM PATTISON WHICH LIES BETWEEN 9th AVENUE As Well As 5th
ROAD. I TIN SHOW YOU– THIS IS FOR BASICALLY A LOT OF
THE INQUIRY HAS BEEN AS
REGARDING THIS. JUST TO UNDERSTAND THE STRENGTH
OF LIGHT UPCOMING OUT OF THE LED,
THE DIGITAL BOARD, IF YOU'' RE STANDING STRAIGHT, PERPENDICULAR
YOU WILL CERTAINLY EXPERIENCE OPTIMUM OF LIGHT. AS WELL AS AT EVERY 100 FEET WE DID A. MEASUREMENT. 2 SETS OF MEASUREMENTS FOR NIT.
METERS, THAT'' S THE ILLUMINATION. MEASUREMENT, AS WELL AS THE OTHER ONE IS THE LIGHTING LEVEL. MEASUREMENT. AS WELL AS WE DID TWO SETS OF READINGS. ONE IS DAYTIME AND AT NIGHTTIME.
BALLS THE LIGHTING LEVEL DIFFERS.
AT BOTH TIMES. SO I WILL BE REVEALING YOU 2.
TABLES, WHEREIN WHICH TOOK THE.
DIMENSION– THE TABLE THAT YOU SEE BELOW IS.
THE LUX METER ANALYSIS. AND THIS TABLE REVEALS THE NIT METER READING. NOW, IN THIS SPECIFIC TABLE,.
AS YOU TIN SEE, AT NIGHTTIME, AT NONE OF THE POINTS THE NIT METER.
READING IS GOING BEYOND 500 NITS.
WHICH IS NOT THE TOPIC OF CONVERSATION IN BETWEEN SO–.
THIS IS THE ILLUMINATION TRESPASS.
SUGGESTION THAT'' S AVAILABLE SO EACH OF THE AREA CAN BE
. DIVIDED INTO NUMEROUS ZONES. THE EXISTING LIGHTS RESEARCH STUDY THAT WE DID, WE BASED IT ON AM BENT.
LIGHT BRIGHTNESS–.
AMBIENT LIGHT BRIGHTNESS.THAT ' S ZONE 3. WHAT THE BASIC SAYS IS.
WHATEVER THE AMBIENT ILLUMINATION IS–.
FOR INSTANCE, IF THE AMBIENT.
LIGHTS LEVEL IS ONE FOOT CANDLE LIGHT, THE CONSOLIDATED LIGHTS.
WITH THE DIGITAL SIGNAGE CAN NOT.
EXCEED 1.8 FOOT CANDLES. SO.8, WHAT YOU SEE IS THE.
ENABLED TRESPASS. WHAT WE WRAPPED UP LOOKING AT THE VARIOUS ANALYSES, THE.
LIGHTING LEVEL WAS NEVER PAST.
THE ADVISED AMBIENT LEVEL. DOES THAT SOLUTION YOUR INQUIRY?
>> > > I WAS GOING TO SAY–. TO RESPONSE MY CONCERN, IS THAT A YES OR A NO? IS THERE ANY RESEARCHES BEEN DONE. THAT– I GUESS THE CONCERN WAS IS THERE ANY STUDIES THAT IS.
> > THERE ARE NUMEROUS RESEARCH STUDIES,. NOT FROM ONE BUT VARIOUS VARIOUS ASSOCIATIONS HAVE DO. > > I'THINK WHAT I ' M SEARCHING.
FOR IS IF SOMEBODY IS EXPRESSION. THAT WE NEED A TROUBLE DUE TO
DRIVER SAFETY AND SECURITY AND THE SE. SETBACK–. THE FARTHER SETBACK IS THE DID HE STATE INTERRUPTION IT IS NOR A. MOTORIST, EXISTS
ANYTHING THAT. REVEALS THAT THERE IS A CORRELATION BETWEEN DIGITALLY.
LIT SIGNS AS WELL AS AUTO MISHAPS?
>> > > YOUR PRAYER, THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF STUDY DONE ON THE.
DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND ALSO TRYING TO.
ASSOCIATE OR TRY TO UNDERSTAND HOW THEY EFFECT SECURITY. NONE OF THE STUDY TO DATE IS.
IF DOES TRIGGER EVEN MORE ACCIDENTS, definitive IN INDICATING THAT. THERE HAS BEEN RESEARCH STUDY DONE.
THAT REVEALS THAT IT IS AND IT ISN'' T', AS WELL AS SINCE IT ' S. RELATIVELY NEW, THERE ' S STILL. CONTINUOUS RESEARCH STUDY, WHERE THE FHWA IN THE U.S.IS DOING QUITE A.
COMPREHENSIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM.
RIGHT NOW TO TRY TO UNDERSTAND THAT BETTER. BUT THAT DETAILS IS NOT.
AVAILABLE YET BUT THE INFORMATION THAT'' S BEEN. GATHERED TO DATE IS INCLUSIVE.
>> > > IS IT NOT AVAILABLE JUST BECAUSE IT''
S–. DIGITAL SIGNS ARE SO NEW TO
THE. MARKET? >> > YES, DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE STUDY IN.
THE DIGITAL BILLBOARDS STARTED.
IN THE EARLY 2000s BUT TO DAY AS I STATED THERE'' S BEEN A WHOLE LOT
OF. RECORDS DONE BUT NOTHING.
CONCLUSIVE, TYING THAT TO SAFE SAFETY.
>> > > SO THERE– I NOTICE IN THE.
RECORD THEY'' RE ASKING FOR 10 SECS AS OPPOSED TO 6. IS IT DUE TO THE– AS.
ALDERMAN CHABOT SAYS, IT APPEARS LIKE A FLASH AND ALSO THE LESS.
FLASHES THERE ARE, THE BETTER.
OFF YOU ARE? >> > > I THINK WHAT ' S MORE CRUCIAL.
IS THE DIRECT EXPOSURES OF THE MOTORISTS.
TO A CERTAIN NUMBER OF ADS, AS WELL AS FROM WHAT WE'' VE SEEN–. INCREASE FROM SOME COMPUTATIONS.
THAT WE'' VE DONE, IT REALLY DOESN ' T MAKE A WHOLE LOT OF DIFFERENCE.
IN TERMS OF THE PRICE WHETHER.
IT'' S A 6 SECONDLY OR 10 SECOND.THE VEHICLE DRIVER IS GENERALLY GOING TO.
BE EXPOSED TO TWO ADS SO.
DEPENDING ON ON WHAT PART OF THE CYCLE THEY'' RE GETTING HERE AT THE.
INDICATOR, MANY ARE GOING TO SEE AT.
LEAST ONE TRANSITION ANYWAYS IF IT'' S 6 OR 10 SECS AS WELL AS THERE ' S. BEEN NO RESEARCH STUDY TO SAY THAT 6.
SEC IS LESS SAFE THAN 10 SECS.
>> > > SO THAT ' S THE ARGUMENT IN THE. INDUSTRY, IS NURT GOING TO SIT THERE
AND WATCH TEN OF THEM GO. BY AS YOU'' RE DRIVE,
YOU ' RE ONLY. GOING TO SEE An OPTIMUM>> 2 OR THREE ANYWAY? > >
>> CORRECT. > > THANK YOU, YOUR >> PRAYER. > > MANY THANKS QUITE, ALDERMAN. JONES. ALDERMAN KEATING? > > MANY THANKS, YOUR PRAISE. I ' LL RETURN TO MY ORIGINAL.
INQUIRY BECAUSE I REALLY DO BELIEVE THAT NITS, NATS, CANDLES.
WITH FEET MUST ALL BE.
MANAGED SINCE WE HAVE TO BECAUSE THAT SPEAKS ABOUT THE.
DISTURBANCE OF BRIGHTNESS.
>> > > WHAT WE ' RE DOING WITH THESE IS WE'' RE ACTUALLY CARING FOR. THEM VARIOUS REGARDING.
IMPACT. THERE ARE CERTAIN POINTS THAT.
HAVE TO BE REGULATED WITHOUT.
QUESTION BUT REGARDING LOCATION INDICATORS AND ALSO ALL OF.
THESE, THESE ARE BEING TREATED.
DIFFERENT THAN ANY OTHER INDICATOR? >> > > CORRECT. OUR IDEA TODAY–.
TODAY'' S LAWS WITH THE 6m SET BACK, THAT THESE SIGNS JUST BE.
ALLOWED IN COMMERCIAL.
INDUSTRIAL PARKS AND ALSO THAT THESE SIGNS DO NOT EFFECT.
RESIDENTIAL, THESE ARE.
EXISTING REGULATIONS TODAY IN AREA IN THE BYLAW. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN KEATING. PRAISE, BUT THANK YOU.

>

> I ' VE GOT A PAIR OF.
QUESTIONS.NOT SURE THAT TO ADDRESS THIS.
ONE WITH BUT I ' VE GOT A NUMBER.
OF AMENDMENTS THAT I WAS SUGGESTING. SOME OF WHICH–.
I ' M NOT SURE TO ADDRESS WITH WHICH WITH WHOM BUT AMONG THE.
RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE. CHANGES THAT I HAD PROPOSED HAD TO DO WITH SOME OF THE. THINGS THAT WERE PRESENTED IN.
CONCERNS TO THE OBSTACLES. ABOUT RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY LINE VERSUS.
REFERRALS INCLUDE 60m ON.
>> 60km/h OR LESS, 10m OR 70km/h OR LESS As Well As 14m FOR 80.
KILOMETRES OR GREATER. I ' M JUST WONDERING WHAT YOUR THOUGHTS REMAIN IN REGARDS TO. THOSE RECOMMENDED CHANGES.
> > WE ARE'AVAILABLE TO THAT'. FOR THE 14m SETBACK, IF IT ' S. FINISHED BOOST, BASED ON.
SPEED LIMITATIONS, WE ' RE OPEN UP TO THAT CONCESSION. AS MENTIONED IN THE ORIGINAL.
PRESENTATION, WE DON ' T THINK IT ' S NECESSARY AS SHOWN BY OUR. UNIQUE SICKNESS AND ALSO THE TRUTH THERE ' S ALREADY A 6m Trouble. > > I ASKED An INQUIRY EARLIER.

THE ONE 2ND CHANGE. VERSUS NO GREATER THAN ONE SECOND SHIFT. > > AS MENTIONED, THE.
TECHNOLOGY ALLOWS THE TRANSITION TO CHANGE, CORRECT.
THE VERSION THAT WE HAVE TODAY.
IS IT SIMPLY UNDER A SECOND SAND IT FULFILLS THE PROPOSED GUIDELINES.
AS WELL AS ADMINISTRATION MENTIONED.
MUST BE GREATER THAN A SECONDLY, AND WE CANISTER CHANGE IT TO BE. CLOSER TO A SECONDLY, JUST OVER. A SECONDLY, IT COULD BE 1.1.
MODERN TECHNOLOGY ALLOWS CHANGE.
TO BE CHANGED. OUR FACTOR, I PRESUME, IS THAT THESE SIGNS HAVE BEEN IN AREA.
FOR ALBERTA FOR TWO-PLUS YEARS. AT THIS VERSION. THEY ' VE WORKED EFFICIENTLY. WE ' RE NOT AWAY–.
KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT ANY CHALLENGES OR SECURITY CONCERNS AND ALSO
THE ONES. IN THE CITY OF CALGARY TODAY. THROUGHOUT CHARM BOARD HAVE BEEN OPERATING 6 MONTHS PLUS,.
AS McNOOISMGT AND THIS.
DESIGN– ONCE MORE THERE HAVE BEEN NO.
CONCERNS THAT WE'' RE KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT.
WITH THE DESIGN RUNNING TODAY.BUT INNOVATION

PERMITS IT TO BE.
TRANSFORMED, CORRECT.
>> BECAUSE I WAS GOING TO SAY I ' VE SEEN OTHER MANUFACTURERS, > >.
OR OTHER COMPANIES HAVE.
CHANGE TIMES CONNECTED WITH A FEW OF THEIR LED.
PRESENTS AS AGAINST WHAT I.
SAW ON THE DISPLAY HERE, WHICH WAS BASICALLY LIKE 1/100 OF A.
SECOND BETWEEN DIFFERENT.
ADS. SO YOU WOULD NOT BE OPPOSED TO.
HAVING IT A MINIMUM OF ONE.
> > CORRECT. > > OKAY.
DISAGREEMENT LATER. IT ISN'' T ONE OF THE PROPOSED. AMENDMENTS THAT I HAD. THERE ARE SOME OTHER THINGS IN RIGHT HERE AND I'' M UNCERTAIN IF YOU. SAW THE ASSIGNMENT ALLEGATION.
RELATED TO MY RECOMMENDED CHANGES. ALDERMAN FARRELL, MYSELF AND.
ALDERMAN PINCOTT HAD A CHANCE TO SPEAK TO MANAGEMENT.
AS WELL AS A FEW OF THE WEB TRAFFIC.
DESIGN INDIVIDUALS IN REGARDS TO WHY THEY HAD ACTUALLY INTEGRATED.
SEVERAL OF THE SETBACKS THAT THEY.
HAD, AREA OF SIGHT AS YOU LISTENED TO, INTENSITY AS WELL AS THE.
CHANGE IN THE WAY THAT.
ADMINISTRATION WILL CERTAINLY REVIEW THOSE BASED ON THE CONE AS YOU.
PROBABLY VIEWED AS OPPOSED TO THE.
CONCENTRIC CIRCLE THAT WAS ORIGINALLY RECOMMENDED AND WAS.
CONSISTED OF IN THE BYLAW. CHANGING IT FROM THE FACE OF AS WELL AS TAKING A LOOK AT THAT CONE AS WELL AS I.
DON'' T KNOW IF YOU HAD A CHANCE. TO APPEARANCE AT THAT CONE BEFORE BUT IT–. WHAT I SAW FROM YOUR PROFESSIONAL.
THERE ON THE LIGHTS FROM STANTECH, SHE DID KIND OF.
DEMONSTRATE THAT THERE WOULD.
BE REDUCED STRENGTH AS YOU RELOCATED OUTSIDE OF THAT CONE. WITHIN THAT CONE, IT KIND.
OF SUGGESTED THAT THE STRENGTH WAS RELATIVELY.
CONCENTRATED IN THOSE AREAS AS.
ILLUMINATION PERSPECTIVE ON THE. CONE THAT WAS OFFERED BY MANAGEMENT AS WELL AS HOW YOU SEE. DIMENSION AS DONE BY THE.
LIGHTS EXPERT IS DONE DIRECTLY ON. DIRECTLY IN THE DIRECTION OF THE INDICATION
SO RIGHT OFF THE BAT WHEN YOU ' RE.
DIGITAL IS OFF IS THESET BACK 6m, 8m, 10, 14m YOU'' RE. BEGINNING TO GET AWAY FROM THE.
30 ° CONE OF VISION ALREADY OFF THE BAT. AS WELL AS YES, 30 ° IS ONE OF THE MOST.
INCIDENCE STRAINED– MOST INTENSE AS WELL AS BASED ON HER.
DIMENSIONS IS GOES DOWN OFF AT.
Concerning 80m.

AT ABOUT 80m FROM THE INDICATION IS.
WHEN AMBIENT LIGHTING PRETTY.
WELL TAKES OVER AND ALSO THAT THE SIGN–.
IF YOU'' RE GOING TO MEASURE IT. FROM 80m As Well As TURN THE INDICATION OFF, YOU OBTAIN THE EXACT SAME DIMENSION.
SPHERES OF THE AMBIENT> ILLUMINATION. IN THE AREA.
> > O.K.', THAT ' S INTERESTING. 80m, I ' M NOT CERTAIN IF I HAD. NOT'LOOKING AT SOMETHING THAT ' S MORE VIBRANT SUCH AS MAYBE.
COMPARISON WITH CONNECTIONS TO. PROXIMITY? AT WHAT POINT WOULD THE FULL. MOON BE BRIGHTER THAN THE.
LIGHT OUTPUT OF An INDICATOR AT 500 NITS DURING THE NIGHT? DO YOU HAVE ANY SORT OF.
COMPARISONS TO KIND OF OFFER M ME–.
>> > > ACTUALLY, YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT.
WOULD BE A GOOD COMPARISON AS WELL AS SHAHEEN WOULD BE THE VERY BEST.
INDIVIDUAL TO ANSWER THIS, WHEN.
SHE MEASURED MEASURES A SIGN SHE COMPARED IT TO NORTH.
AMERICAN ILLUMINATION STANDARDS.
FOR LIGHTING AS WELL AS LIGHT SPECIFICATIONS THAT THE CITY OF.
CALGARY MAKES USE OF, LIGHTING THAT.
YOU DO INSIDE AN LEAVE OF A BUILDING, FOR CIRCUMSTANCES,.
SPECIFIC LIGHTS DEGREE.
INDICATOR– LIGHT BRIGHT COMPARED TO THE. NORMAL LIGHT STANDARDS THAT.
THE CITY UTILIZES IN SURROUNDING AREAS. WOULD THAT BE SDWRESH A SENSE. OF REFERENCE IN REGARDS TO OUTDOOR–. INSIDE YOUR HOME IT ' S A SEPARATE CONCERN
. HDTVs SELF-ADJUST BUT THEY DON ' T HAVE TO TAKE ON. AMBIENT LIGHT INDOORS SO IF.
YOU TRANSFORM OUT ALL THE LIGHTS ON THE
INSIDE THE SCREEN WILL. DECLINE DOWN TO ABOUT 450 NITS.
WELL, WITH– IF YOU OPEN UP THE CURTAINS, YOU. WON ' T HAVE THE ABILITY TO SEE IT.'DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT ONLY PUTS OUT TYPICALLY MAX OF A THOUSAND.
NITS SO HENCE THE FACTOR FOR.
5,000 KNITS NITS DURING THE DAY FOR AN OUTDOOR SIGN SO.
SIMPLY A SENSE OF–.
PLACING THINGS INTO POINT OF VIEW IN COMPARISON TO.
OTHER POINTS, IF YOU COULD.
OFFER ME SOME COMPARATIVE EVALUATION ON THAT.
>> > > YEAH, SHAHEEN CANISTER TALK.
ABOUT A FEW OTHER LIGHTS STHADZ THE CITY UTILIZES TO.
STEP BASIC LIGHTING.
OUTSIDE.

>> > > THE ILLUMINATION LEVEL.
GENERALLY–.
IF YOU'' RE TALKING LIKE EAST VILLAGE, LIKE PATHWAY IS LIKE.
1.5, 1.8 FOOT CANDLE LIGHTS. THAT'' S THE LIGHTING LEVEL. NOW, THE DIGITAL BOARD RESEARCH.
THAT WE DID, MANY OF THE.
IF YOU TIN SEE THE READ THAT, analysis– I CAN PUT IT AGAIN–.
GO WE TOOK, THE MAXIMUM THAT.
WE GOT WAS 1.98 FOOT CANDLES SO IF YOU TAKE REGULAR.
LIGHTS LEVEL FOR DOWNTOWN,.
LIKE I WOULD SAY IT NEED TO RESEMBLE ABOUT ONE FOOT CANDLE SO.
ALLOWED THE–.
THE OPTIMUM ALLOWED TRESPASS IS.8 FOOT CANDLES SO ONE FOOT.
CANDLE AMBIENT ANDS ALSO THE LIGHT.
TRESPASS VIA THE DIGITAL SIGNAGE, IF YOU ASSEMBLE,.
IT'' S LIKE 1.8 FOOT CANDLES. SOME PLACES IT MAY BE SLIGHTLY EVEN MORE, 1.2 FOOT.
CANDLES PLUS.8 SO IT'' S ABOUT. 2 FOOT CANDLES SO IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE ILLUMINATION LEVELS THAT WE.
GOT IT'' S LESS THAN 2 FOOT.
CANDLES, SIMPLY THE LIGHTING DEGREE.
>> > > JUST HOW MUCH IT WOULD ELIMINATE.
THE GROUND DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE INDICATION?
>> > > AGAIN, WHEN YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE.
DIGITAL SIGNS, IT DEPENDS UPON– LIKE, THE RESEARCH THAT.
WE DID, IT WAS FOR THE.
DOWNTOWN.NOW, A VARIOUS STANDARD. WOULD APPLY IF THIS IS FOR A.
RESIDENTIAL AREA.
if IT ' S A RESIDENTIAL LOCATION. THE LIGHT TRESPASS LIMITATION.
IS LOWER COMPARED TO THE MEDIUM MIXED USE UNIT THAT WE.
IT'' S SUBJECTIVE AND ALSO IT DEPENDS WHERE IT'' S BEING USED. > > WHETHER IT'' S TRANSMITTED.
ONE CANDLEABRA OR ONE CANNEDA. DIMENSION, LIKE ONE CANDLEA PER METERS SETTLED?
>> > > THAT ' S RIGHT
>>. > > AS A MEASUREMENT WHETHER IT'' S REFLECTED OR TRANSMITTED. SO FOR AN I WILL HUGE NATURED.
INDICATOR THAT'' S LIT FROM A STATISTIC INCANDESCENT LIGHT.
THAT'' S SHOWED OFF OF A SIGN,.
HAS THERE BEEN ANY TYPE OF MEASUREMENTS DONE CON SEVERAL OF.
THOSE EXISTING INDICATORS?
>> > > YES AS A MATTER OF FACT WHEN WE WERE DOING THE RESEARCH STUDY WE ALSO TOOK A.
DIMENSION FROM AMONG THE.
LIGHTING WHICH WAS STANDARD, CONVENTIONAL. IF YOU ARE LOOKING AT THE.
TRADITIONAL BOARD, THIS IS WHAT YOU WOULD OBTAIN.
APPROXIMATELY. ANOTHER PERSON THING TO MENTION, THAT THE READ THAT IS YOU WILL SEE,.
IT'' S OBTAINED AS WHITE.

BACKGROUND.THAT ' S ONE OF THE MOST–.
MAXINE TENSITY–.
OPTIMUM STRENGTH SO ALL THE ANALYSES THAT YOU SEE IS THE.
WHITE BACKGROUND OF DIGITAL.
SIGNAGE. >> > > OH. SO THIS NOT LED SIGNBOARD THAT.
YOU'' RE REFERENCING, THAT WASN'' T NECESSARILY A FULL.
WHITE HISTORY?
>> > > IT WAS PARTLY. LIKE THE ONE WHICH I TOOK–.
IT HAD SOME WHITE HISTORY.
> > ALL.– INTERESTING. ONCE AGAIN, LIMITED TO–.
BECAUSE CAKE TICK SITUATION ON THOSE TYPE OF SIGNS ON A.
BILLBOARD, THE INTENSITY.
WOULDN'' T VARY DEPENDING ON THE ANGLE OF SIGHT. YOU WOULDN ' T HAVE THAT.
LIMITING CONE THAT YOU WOULD HAVE WITH AN LED?
>> > > THAT ' S CORRECT NCHT.
>> > > IT WOULD BE SAME OUTPUT? >> > > YES>>. > > LARGE RANGE?
>> > > THAT ' S RIGHT

>>. > > AS OPPOSED TO An EXTREMELY
. CONCENTRATED OUT PUT WITH AN LED?
>> > > THAT ' S RIGHT >>. > > THANK YOU.
>> THAT ASSISTS. > > ONE EVEN MORE FACTOR, I DISCOVERED KNOW WITH THE CONVENTIONAL.
BOARD, WE HAVE THE UP LIGHTS.
— WHICH WE GENERALLY DON'' T ACCOUNT– THERE'' S A GREAT DEAL OF.
LIGHT SPILLED THAT GOES UP,. WHEREAS FOR THE DIGITAL BOARD, IT'' S PRIMARILY COMING OUT OF IT.
AS WELL AS DOWNWARDS SO NOTHING GOING.
UP. >> > > NO LIGHT DILG CONTAMINATION? THANKS, OK. THEREFORE I'' M UNSURE IF YOU HAD HAD An OPPORTUNITY TO CONSIDER SOME.
OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS,.
INCLUDING SOME OF THE RELAXATIONS ON THE LAW.
GUIDELINES– I'' M UNCERTAIN. THAT CANISTER REMARK ON EVERY ONE OF THESE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS THAT.
WE WERE GOING TO ADVANCE.
THERE ' S ABDOMINAL MUSCLE, C, D, E AND F, G, H
AND I AND AS WELL AS AS PART COMPONENT THE. IS THERE ANYTHING IN HERE THAT YOU DO LIKE OTHER THAN THE TEN. DON ' T LIKE?
THAT YOU ASSUME IS SOMETHING.
THAT YOU COULD COLLABORATE WITH? >> > > YOUR WORSHIP, WITH THE.
CHAIR PROBABLY I'' M BEST TO.
RESPONSE THAT.THE SHORT

ANSWER ALDERMAN.
CHABOT IS THE AMENDMENTS THAT.
ARE SUGGESTED HANDLE SOME MATTERS WHICH WE DON'' T HAVE AN. ISSUE WITH. THEY DEAL WITH A FEW OTHER THINGS THAT THE SECTOR.
DOESN'' T HAVE AN'CONCERN WITH. YOU ' VE HEARD THE RESPONSE REGARDING THE FINISHED OBSTACLE–.
YOU OBTAINED YOUR SOLUTION, 20.
SECS. THE PROBLEM WITH THE 300m as well as.
THE TROUBLE WITH THE 150m EVEN.
IF YOU TAKE IT FROM THE FRONT, WHICH IS An EXCELLENT IMPROVEMENT I.
ADMIT, IT DOESN'' T TAKE CARE OF. WHAT YOU ' RE TRYING TO ACCESS WHICH IS LAST ACTORS AND.
EXPOSURE. YOU'' VE HEARD EVIDENCE OF THE MEASUREMENT, FOR INSTANCE, IT.
SAYS 08m IS ABOUT IN WHICH IT.
IT DOESN'' T ALLOW ONE TO DEAL. WITH THE CIRCUMSTANCE THAT YOU'' RE. DEALING WITH, WHERE THE INDICATOR IS IN WHICH IT'' S POINTING AND SO.
WHAT WE WOULD LIKE YOU TO. DO IS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THAT HIS GREAT DEAL OF SITUATIONAL ISSUES.
TO DEAL WITH THERE. NOBODY HAS A TROUBLE WITH NOT BEAM FARMING LIGHT INTO A.
RESIDENTIAL HOUSE SYSTEM. IT'' S A GOOD BEGINNING FROM THE FRONT. IT'' S GREAT THAT THE.
RECOMMENDATION IS TO BE RELAXABLE, TRYING TO RELAX.
THAT SORT OF REGULATION AT STAB IS.
CHALLENGING IF IT'' S IRONCLAD, LIKE FORBADE SO THERE'' S A. BIT OF A WORDING PROBLEM SO THAT.
WILL LOOK AFTER THAT. THE COURSE E INDICATION AND ALSO THE.
KLASMT F SIGN SPACING WE'' VE. ALREADY CHATTED ABOUT, I PUT ON'' T THINK YOU ' VE ADDRESSED THAT.
AS WELL AS'LAND USE DISTRICTS, I. DON ' T KNOW THAT THOSE WERE ADDRESSED IN YOUR AMENDMENT, I.
DIDN'' T SEE THEM. THAT ' S A VARIOUS ISSUE TOTALLY. SO WITH RESPECT TO THE.
CHANGE, THE GRUMBLING TO SAY ANY RULES ARE RELAXABLE IS.
WELCOME. THE SPLITTING UP FROM HOME LINE RATES. AGREEMENTED ON SPEED. THE MEASUREMENT OF RESULT ON A RESIDENTIAL HOUSE UNIT FROM.
THE FACE OF INDICATOR IS WELCOME.
WE WOULD LIKE A LITTLE EVEN MORE TUNING UP DONE BASED ON.
WHAT YOU'' VE HEARD TODAY.
>> > > SO YOU ' RE SAYING THE 80m MEASUREMENT WOULD BE SOMETHING.
THAT YOU WOULD BE EVEN MORE.
INCLINED TO ASSISTANCE AS OPPOSED TO 150 OR 300?
>> > > YES, YOUR PRAYER.
>> >

>> > O.K.. > > ACTUALLY, I HAVE NO FURTHER. INQUIRIES AT THIS POINT
. HAVE LOTS TO DEBATE FURTHER.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I'' M A. LITTLE BIT SHOCKED, ALDERMAN CHABOT. I WAS ALL CLEARING UP IN FOR THE.
> > THANK YOU. A GREAT DEAL OF MY QUESTIONS WERE AROUND LIGHTING AS WELL AS THE REAL.
INFLUENCE ON LIGHTING– ON THE.
LIGHT RESULT OF THESE DETAILS. AND YOU'' VE DONE A GREAT DEAL OF FUNCTION.
TO TRY AS WELL AS OBTAIN US TO.
UNDERSTAND THAT AND ALSO I APPRECIATE THAT. WHEN WE TAKE An APPEARANCE AT YOUR.
ILLUSTRATION OF ESSENTIALLY THE DROP-OFF AS WE GO OFF FROM.
THE CHECKING OUT ANGLE, DID YOU.
COMPUTE THAT AS A PERCENTAGE, WHAT TYPE OF DROP-OFF AT 30%,.
70%–.
AT 70 °, 30 °? OR DO WE SIMPLY HAVE IT AS SIMPLY.
THE STRAIGHT DIMENSIONS?
>> > > THIS DIMENSION ACTUALLY COMES FROM THE PRODUCER OF.
THE LED, ANYONE WHO PRODUCED.
THE DIGITAL SO WE GOT IF FROM THEM BUT WE DIDN'' T TAKE
IT THE. MEANS IT IS. WE ACTUALLY DID A DIMENSION AT WEBSITE WHICH WAS REALLY CLOSE.
TO WHAT THEY HAVE SUGGESTED.
>> >

> OKAY.AND WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE AESNA.
STANDARDS, WHEN WE TAKE A.
CONSIDER SAY THE STANDARDS FOR AMBIENT STREET LIGHT, STREET.
LEVEL INTENSITY REQUIRED FOR.
SAFETY ON A WALKWAY, SAY FOR YOU UNDERSTAND A PEDESTRIAN, WHAT'' S. THE MINIMAL LEVEL FOOT CANDLES.
THAT WE REQUIREMENT ON A SIDEWALK FOR NIGHTTIME SAFETY?
>> > > WHEN WE DEFINED LIKE.
PATHWAY SAFETY AND SECURITY, THERE ARE AREAS THAT COULD BE SPECIFIED. THE AREA–.
THERE COULD BE AREA THAT IS SAFE AND ALSO WOULD REQUIRE LOWER.
FOOT CANDLES AND ALSO THERE COULD.
BE AREA WHICH CALLS FOR HIGH SAFETY SO I MAY–.
CHATTING ABOUT HIGH SAFETY,.
THE NEED IS REGARDING 1.5 FOOT CANDLE LIGHTS.
>> > > 1.5 BEING O.K..
>> > > THERE ARE LOCATIONS WHICH WE HAVE DESIGNED WHICH LIKEWISE DEALS.
WITH.5 FOOT CANDLES ROUNDS.
THAT'' S NOT A VERY SECURITY ISSUE LOCATION.
>> > > SO SORT OF.5 IS THE POINT–.
SO IF I RETURN– IF I GO AFTER THAT TO YOUR TABLE.
THAT IS MEASURING–.
WHERE YOU'' RE DETERMINING FOOT CANDLES FAR FROM THE INDICATOR,.
WHEN WE'' RE HAVING A LOOK AFTER THAT,. SAY.5 FOOT CANDLES AS TYPE OF A NIGHTTIME AMBIENT LIGHT.
LEVEL FROM GUIDELINES FOR.
SECURITY, MOST OF THESE, EXCEPT FOR THE ONES THAT ARE.
IN YELLOW, WHICH YOU ARE–.
ARE LISTED BELOW THAT DEGREE, RIGHT? >> > > THAT ' S RIGHT
>>. > > AND ALSO THE ONES IN YELLOW ARE
. DIMENSIONS THAT WRM TAKEN AS YOU RELOCATED AWAY THAT YOU ENDED.
IT UP BEING CLOSE TO A STREET.
LIGHT? >> > > THAT ' S. WHEREVER IT'' S HIGHLIGHTED IS

. YELLOW.THERE WAS A LIGHTING REQUIREMENT.
EXTREMELY CLOSE TO WHERE WE WERE.
TAKING THE DIMENSION, THAT'' S WHY WE HIGHLIGHTED IT.
SEPARATELY.
>> > > O.K.. AND AFTER THAT THE ONES THAT ARE NA,.
IS THAT DUE TO THE FACT THAT THERE WAS– I.
DON'' T KNOW– A STRUCTURE OR SOMETHING IN THE SFWHA >> > > YES,.
THERE WAS A BUILDING.

> > SO THAT ' S THE DISAGREEMENT IN THE. > > CORRECT. > > IT WAS PARTLY. > > THERE ARE LOCATIONS WHICH WE HAVE DESIGNED WHICH LIKEWISE DEALS.
> > THAT ' S.IT WAS DROPPING INSIDE– SEVERAL OF THE POINTS WERE
FALLING INSIDE THE BUILDING
SINCE FOSSIL FUELS A.
HIGHWAY FREEWAY WE HAD JUST SIMPLY, as well as SOME FACTOR IT WAS NOT SAFE TO TAKE.
THOSE FACTORS. >> > > EXPAND YOUR FURTHEST AWAY.
MEASUREMENT– YOU DID THIS IN.
HUNDRED FOOT INCREMENTS SO YOUR OUTERMOST AWAY WAS 300.
FEET SO–.
>> > > THAT ' S CORRECT >>. > > TO ASSEMBLE FOR A INTO. METERS, A HUNDRED METERS MAX>>? > > JESMT WAS THE OUTERMOST YOU WERE AWAY. AND IN ALMOST ALL LOCATIONS,.
EXCEPT FOR STRAIGHT ON, IF YOU HELD YOUR HAND UP, YOU.
WOULDN'' T REALLY SEE A SHADOW? BECAUSE YOU ARE BELOW AMBIENT LIGHT LEVELS?
>> > > AS WELL AS ADDITIONALLY THE READINGS THAT.
WE TOOK, JUST TO MENTION TO THE COUNCIL, THE READ THAT GO.
WE TOOK WAS AT EYE LEVEL.
SAY THANKS TO YOU.I SIMPLY–. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK
. > > THANK YOU, PRAYER.
THE GUIDELINES AS WELL AS THE IMPACTS.
THAT IT'' S GOING TO HAVE. NOW, I COMPREHEND THAT THE 6.
2ND REGULATION VERSUS THE 10.
SECOND REGULATION, WHAT CURRENTLY I IS–.
AS WELL AS CORRECT ME IF I'' M MISDOING.
WHAT CURRENTLY IS ALLOWED WITH THE FLIPPY ONES IS 6.
SECONDS, IS THAT RIGHT? SO YOU'' RE– OR IS IT 10 SECS? >> > CURRENTLY–.
IN FACT I'' M GOING TO SHOW IT VISUALLY. CURRENTLY THERE''
S NO. THEY'' RE ON A PRISM EXPAND WE'' LL PLAY ONE NOW.
MUCH BETTER BUT– >> > > ACTUALLY CAN YOU GO TO THE.
FULL SCREEN TOO. THERE IT IS, THE ONE LEFT WING. , if YOU WANT TO BEGINNING MANUALLY.
.
COUNTING IT THAT'' S UP FOR ABOUT 3 TO 4 SECS AND AFTER THAT.
THERE'' S A PHYSICAL MOVEMENT. WHICH IS ANOTHER 2 SECS PLUS. SO YOU REACH BE LIKE 5, 6.
SWEKDZ THE ADVERTISEMENT AND THE MOTION.AND AFTER THAT WE '

VE COMPARED IT TO. OUR DIGITAL 6 SECONDLY
MODEL TO. THE RIGHT.
> > O.K.. >> > > AS WELL AS YOU CAN SEE THE.
DISTINCTION OF THE PHYSICAL MOVEMENT AS WELL AS THE ADVERTISEMENT ROOM. AND ALSO AS WE PRESENTED THIS.
PRODUCT A YEAR AND ALSO A FIFTY PERCENT AGO AS WELL AS WE MET WITH ADMINISTRATION,.
WE SPOKE ABOUT THIS IS JUST.
ALL-NATURAL STEP, EVOLUTION OF A SIGNBOARD. THE MECHANIC FRIEND TRIO ON THE.
LEFT WAS ALSO– ALSO OBTAINED TREPIDATION BY.
THE CITY TWENTY YEARS EARLIER. THE ONE ON THE LEFT HAS BEEN AROUND FOR 20 YEARS THROUGHOUT.
NORTH AMERICA, 3.
MARKETERS. THAT CAN BE REACTIVATED ONCE AGAIN. THREE MARKETERS. AS WELL AS BASICALLY WE THINK THE INDICATORS–.
THE JOIN THE RIGHT IS A.
NATURAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE MECHANICAL TO THE DIGITAL,.
STILL DIG HAVING FUN AESTHETIC.
MESSAGE, AS WELL AS ACTUALLY THE PERIOD IS EVEN LONGER ON THE.
ROAD, 6 SEC AS YOU HEARD.
EARLIER, THE LONGER THE BETTER.AND AT THE EXACT SAME TIME THEY ' VE. BEEN AROUND FOR'A NUMBER OF.
> > AND I VALUE THAT SO. TRI-LATERAL INDICATION, NOW, THAT IS ALSO BRIGHTENED AT NIGHT, IS.
IT NOT?
>> > > CORRECT.
IT'' S–
. IT ' S EXTERNALLY LIT SO.
> > OKAY. SO THERE ' S LESS LIGHT AIR POLLUTION BECAUSE OF THIS> OF IT. BEING EXTERNALLY LIT, SHINING.
UP ONTO THE– >
> YES, AS SHOWN BY THE–. THERE IS AN PROFESSIONAL HERE–. BECAUSE THE LIGHT, it ' S EVEN MORE ADVANTAGEOUS FOR THE DIGITAL SIGN. IS INCLUDED AND CONCENTRATED IN. THE THE LINES OF THE INDICATOR AND IT BEAMS DOWNWARD AS
OPPOSED. TO THE TECHNIQUE FOR YEARS AND ALSO.
YEARS WHICH IS LIGHTS ON THE BASE TO SHINE UPWARD.
>> > > RIGHT, O.K.. CURRENTLY, I DERBY VALUED THE COMMENT THAT ALDERMAN CHABOT.
WHEN THE STOP CURRENTLY, MADE ABOUT. THE SIGN ON THE LEFT WHEN IT BEGINS TO ALTER AND ALSO IT'' S. ALMOST LIKE A PAGE TURNING.
AS OPPOSED TO SOMETHING THAT'' S JUST INSTANTANEOUSLY CHANGING.
THE PICTURE BUT YOU'' RE EXPRESSION. > > OH, OKAY, 2 SECONDS THEN? OKAY.
LOTS OF SECS RIGHT HERE AND AFTERWARDS 2 SECONDS?
>> > > IT TAKES 3 TO 4 SECS.
ACTUALLY FOR THAT PHYSICAL MOTION TO GO THROUGH AND ALSO THEN.
AS SOON AS THE MOTION IS STOPPED THE.
ADVERTISEMENT IS UP FOR LIKE 3 TO 4 SEC MAX.
>> > > O.K.. SO THE CONTINUITY IS BASICALLY JUST REALLY–.
THE ADVANCE IN MODERN TECHNOLOGY, THE.
EVOLUTION OF THE INDICATOR, TO BE ABLE TO INSTANTLY HAVE A.
DIGITAL PHOTO WHICH YOU CAN.
TRANSFER A LOT MORE SDWRESH CORRECT. AS OPPOSED TO LITERALLY TAKING.
3 SECS IT CAN NOW– ELECTRONIC DIGITAL CANISTER BE.
DONNA SECOND.
>> >

> OKAY.WHAT STRUCK ME AS INTERESTING.
IS THAT AS An OUTCOME OF THIS,.
YOU WERE ABLE TO INCLUDE ON CIVIL SERVICE MESSAGING.
>> > > THE 2ND DESIGN IS.
ESSENTIAL TO United States FOR 2 REASONS. ONE, AS MENTIONED, IT'' S BEEN. AROUND FOR SEVERAL YEARS.
THESE SIGNS ARE NOT–. THEY ' RE COSTLY, PROFITS. AND THE 6 SEC ALLOWS United States TWO THINGS. ONE AND ALSO A LOT OF IMPORTANTLY SMALL.
SERVICES SO AFFORD IT. IT KEEPS THE PRICES DOWN SO.
THAT SMALL BUSINESSES ARE.
GETTING THESE ADS AND ALSO CONTAINERS COMPETE AGAINST BOX.
SHOP, NATIONAL CHAINS. SECONDLY, THE VERSION PERMITS US TO GIVE AWAY ONE SPOT–.
IT'' S A TEN MESSAGE DESIGN, 10. 6-SECOND MESSAGES SO WE DONATE 10 %OF THE INDICATOR TO NON-PROFIT.
>> > >'IT ' S INTO THE SOMETHING. YOU ' RE PROPOSING, IT ' S SOMETHING THAT YOU ' RE ACTUALLY. DOING? > > IT ' S IT ' S SOMETHING WE DO NOW. I ' M SORRY NOT COMPONENT OF THE BUY. LAWYER, IT ' S A MANDATE OF OUR FIRM.
AS MENTIONED BY DOUG, OUR. SPEAKER, WE ' VE BEEN DOING SERVICE BELOW FOR 80-PLUS.
YEARS. AND IT'' S A MANDATE FROM OUR OWNERSHIP TO RETURN TO THE.
COMMUNITY THAT WE RESIDE IN AND.
WORK WITH.SO IT WAS MADE CLEAR FROM DAY. 1 WE INTRODUCED THESE INDICATORS. FROM OUR HEAD-UP OWNERSHIP IS THAT WE DONATE ONE AREA FOR. NON-PROFIT AND ALSO CHARITY.
AND THAT SPOT REMAINS 24/7 THROUGHOUT THE YEAR,.
REGARDLESS IF WE HAVE A LINE UP.
FOR ADVERTISERS WHO WISH TO TAKE THAT AREA, REGARDLESS IF.
WE CONTAINER MARKET THAT EVEN MORE.
10% OF THE SIGN MOSTS LIKELY TO THAT AND A LETTER? YOUR BUNDLE–.
>> > > CURRENTLY,'I ' VE BEEN LOOKING THROUGH THIS BOOK
THAT YOU HAD
. SENT US–. OR SORRY', THAT YOU ' VE DISTRIBUTED TO United States WITH A FEW OF.
THE INDICATION LOCATIONS– I KNOW.
YOU TIN'' T SEE IT FROM THERE WITH THE 300m RADIUS. CURRENTLY, SOME OF THE INDICATIONS THAT.
ARE INDICATED RIGHT HERE ARE ON MAJOR HIGHWAYS LIKE 9th Opportunity.
BUT IF THIS PROHIBITION COMES.
INTO EFFECT, IT ESSENTIALLY WOULD REMOVE THE TOOBLT USE.
THESE DIGITAL SIGNS BUT NOT.
NECESSARILY THE EXISTING SIGNS THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN POSITION?
>> > > CORRECT>>. > > IT WOULD PREVENT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS NEW.
KIND OF INDICATOR?
>> > > YEAH, CORRECT.WE HAVE ONE

ON 9th AVENUE,.
THROUGHOUT FROM THE GREYHOUND BUS.
DEPOT AS YOU COME INTO THE CORE.
>> > > MACLEOD ROUTE.
>> > > NOW THAT INDICATOR UTILIZED TO BE THE ONE ON THE LEFT, THE.
TRIO. THE SAME SIGNBOARD THERE FOR SEVERAL YEARS ON THE CP RAIL RIGHT OF.
WAY. WE MOSTED LIKELY TO THE CITY AS WELL AS ASKED TO CONTAINING CHANGE IT FROM.
MECHANICAL TO DIGITAL. IT WAS REFUSED. THE APPEAL BOARD HEARD OUR.
PRESENTATION AS WELL AS FELT IT WAS.
APPROPRIATE BASED ON THE NUMEROUS CONDITIONS THAT WERE.
PUT IN PLACE. A GREAT DEAL OF IT IS TODAY IN THE GUIDELINES THAT ARE BEING RECOMMENDED.
IN FRONT OF COUNCIL.
>> > > SO NOTWITHSTANDING THE TRUTH IT EXPERIENCED STAB–.
THAT'' S EVEN MORE OF AN. ADMINISTRATION ACTIVE QUESTION,'PERHAPS I ' LL HOLD THAT ONE.
ACTUALLY ALDERMAN HODGES. STATED IT, THE CONCEPT OF– HE REALLY CLAIMED SOMETHING. CONCERNING AMBER WHICH ACTIVATED.
SOMETHING IN MY HEAD ABOUT AM BERT INFORMS. DO YOU RECOGNIZE SOMETHING ABOUT.
> > REALLY KNOW IS VERY WEATHER CONDITION. THERE ' S A HANDFUL OF THESE SIGNS, THE NETWORK COULD
BE.
DIVISIONS, SUCH AS THE POLICE TO USE IT FOR AMBER.
ALERT. IT'' S ALREADY USED IN THE U.S.EXTENSIVELY.

WHEN THERE IS AN BROWNISH-YELLOW.
ALERT, THEY HAVE ACCESSIBILITY TO THE THEY as well as signs HAVE PASSWORDS.
AND ALSO CODES AND ALSO TEMPERATURE LEVEL.
PLATES THEY CANISTER GET INVOLVED IN THE SYSTEM AS WELL AS PUT UP AN AMBER.
ALERT, IMMEDIATELY USING THE.
NETWORK OF SIGNS. >> > > STHETS THING SOMETHING THAT.
YOU WOULD REALLY SUPPORT?
>> > > WE WOULD BE THRILLED IF WE COULD MAKE THAT WORK WITH ONE.
OF THE DEPARTMENTS HERE. YES, NATURALLY WE WOULD SUPPORT IT. WE WOULD DO THIS NOW WITH OUR.
IT'' S JUST THAT IT TAKES A. WHILE? SORRY, NOT NOR AMBER ALERT BUT FOR LOST, MISSING PERSONS, FOR.
TRAINING COURSE TAKES A FEW WEEKS TO PUT IT UP. SEE, BROWNISH-YELLOW ALERT YOU NEED.
PROMPTLY, ELECTRONIC NATURALLY–.
>> > > YEAH,'I ' VE SEEN THAT HAPPEN.
IN THE UNITED STATES.

>> > > YES AND WE WOULD PROPOSE.
THAT–.
AGAIN IT WOULDN'' T BE A BYLAW POINT BUT WOULD BE PART
>> OF OUR. PROPOSITION, YES. > > A GREAT DEAL OF THESE REALLY TECHNICAL ISSUES WITH REGARDS.
TO THE LIGHTING AND SO ON AS WELL AS. SO FORTH, I ' M GOING TO ASK QUESTIONS OF ADMINISTRATION AS. WELL. BUT WHAT I ' M SEEING IS THAT I COMPREHEND THAT THERE IS A.
TECHNOLOGICAL BREAKTHROUGH AS WELL AS AS A. RESULT, IT IS INTERESTING, CERTAINLY, AND ALSO IT HAS VARIOUS–.
THERE IS UNEASINESS CERTAINLY.
FROM OUR ADMINISTRATION AS WELL AS PEOPLE THAT ARE THINKING THAT.
THIS WILL CERTAINLY HAVE A MAJOR EFFECT.
ON THE VISUAL LIGHT AIR POLLUTION AND ALSO THAT'' S CONCERNING TOWELS.
AS A TOWN AS WELL AS.
CERTAINLY TO THE DIFFERENT WARD ALDERMEN. SOME OF THE COMMENTS THAT.
YOU'' RE STATING WITH PROHIBITION OF THE 300m WE WOULD.
SUCCESSFULLY GET RID OF A GREAT DEAL OF.
THESE MAJOR ROADS, I INDICATE, I HAVE A LOT OF COMPASSION.
TOWARDS THAT IN UNDERSTANDING.
THAT THAT HAS AN INFLUENCE ON BEING ABLE TO SUPPLY THIS. YOU'' VE ANSWERED
MY. QUESTIONS WITH REGARDS TO THE 10 SECS AND THE SIX.
SECS AS WELL AS ALSO YOUR CAPACITY.
TO GIVE AN AMBER ALERT, WHICH I BELIEVE IS INTERESTING,.
AS WELL AS THANKS QUITE FOR.
YOUR PRESENTATIONS.THANK YOU, YOUR PRAISE. >

> Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK
>>. YOU, ALDERMAN MAR.
ALDERMAN POOTMANS?
>> > > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAISE. OF ALL THE FASCINATING CONCERNS I WANT TO DIG A LITTLE.
I'' M NOT CERTAIN WHO TO ADDRESS. COMPLYING WITH ON ALDERMAN JONES''.
RECOMMENDING THAT WE DELETE.
THE SUGGESTION DEVELOPING THE 300m Policy.
THAT APPEARS FAIRLY CLEAR. DO YOU HAVE A RECOMMENDATION OF WHAT THE APPROPRIATE.
RANGE SHOULD BE? EXISTS ANY OTHER CONCERNS? >> > > THE SUGGESTION, IF IT.
WASN'' T FOR JUST STRAIGHT. DELEAGUE, BECAUSE AS MENTIONED EARLIER WE FEELING THAT THE LAW.
ADDRESSES IT TODAY WITH.
SAFEGUARDING RESIDENTIAL, IT'' S REALLY CLEAR IN THE LAW TODAY.
THAT THESE SIGNS CAN NOT EFFECT.
IF YOU WANTED ME TO THROW, negatively ON RESIDENTIAL BUT.
SOMETHING OUT, SUGGEST A.
CONCESSION, IT WOULD PROBABLY BE 100m SO I WOULD TAKE IT–.
WE'' RE EXPRESSION 80 NOW, YOU'' RE. SPEAKING WITH THE LIGHTING SPECIALIST BUT 100m FROM THE CONE,.
30 ° CONE OF FRONT OF THE INDICATION,.
100m FROM THE FRONT OF THE INDICATION IN A MAJOR 30 ° PORTION. > > THANK YOU. AND ALSO ADDITIONALLY, I ' M NOT CERTAIN IT>> ' S. BEEN BROUGHT UP BUT WHAT ABOUT.
BEHIND THE INDICATOR? EXIST ANY ISSUES–. MUST THERE BE A DISTANCE.
THAT ' S APPROPRIATE'FOR TECHNICAL REASONS, SOME KIND.
OF SUPERHIGH FREQUENCY OR.
ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION– STHUD WE BE PLACING THEM 10.
FEET OUTSIDE THE WINDOW OF A.
MULTI-UNIT GROWTH AS AN EXAMPLE?
>> > > THERE ' S NO ANXIETY FROM AN.
DIGITAL POINT OF SIGHT FOR THE SIGN. IT'' S LIKE A TELEVISION.'IT ' S LED TECHNOLOGY NOSMGT YOU TIN BACK UP YOUR T.V., NO.
EFFECT P YOU COULD HAVE.
VARIOUS BEHIND YOUR T.V., NO INFLUENCE. EXACT SAME IDEOLOGY HERE. WHEN IT COMES TO LIGHTS, AS SHOWN BY THE LIGHTING EVENT, ONCE AGAIN LIKE.
LED T.V., IF YOU STAND AT AN.
ANGLE LOOKING PAT YOUR T.V., YOU TIN'' T CONSTRUCT OUT THE IMAGE,
. YOU TIN BARELY SEE ANY LIGHT.
ORIGINATING FROM IT.SO AS SHOWN, THERE''
S NO. ILLUMINATION ISSUES WHATSOEVER.
BEHIND THE SIGN. THE SIGN BARELY–.
IT BARELY BLEEDS ANY LIGHT ON.
THE EDGES OF THE CHECK IN FRONT AND FROM BEHIND IT'' S 0 %. SO NO REQUIREMENT THERE FOR.
SEPARATION. >> > > THANKS. SIMPLY THE ISSUE OF CURIOSITY.
THEN, WHAT DOES MARKET METHOD IN REQUISITES OF.
BILLBOARDS AND RESIDENTIAL.
WINDOWS? WAS THERE A NORM AT PEROT–.
NORMAL PROTOCOL OR INDUSTRY.
BASIC JOOD WE'' RE NOT ALLOWED IN RESIDENTIAL. DISTRICTS', THAT ' S REALLY CLEAR. IN THE BYLAW IT STATES THAT LIGHTING.
POSITIONING OF An INDICATION CAN NOT.
ADVERSELY EFFECT RESIDENTIAL SO THAT'' S An EXTREMELY BLACK AND
. WHITE– VERY CLEAR STATEMENT.
IN THE BYLAW TODAY.

>> > > A SINGLE CONDO TOWER WOULD.
CONSTITUTE A RESIDENTIAL.
AREA, THAT ZONING IS SUCH THAT YOU WOULD BE PROHIBITED.
FROM LOCATING EVEN IN SAY A.
NEIGHBORING AREA– LAND USE THAT WOULD PROBABLY.
PERMIT YOU TO BE THERE?
>> > > THAT ' S INTERESTING BECAUSE MIDTOWN IS A MIXED USE AREA,.
IT'' S NOT UNCOMMON TO SEE A. APARTMENT TOWER ZONED TO ALLOW THESE SORT OF SIGNS NEARBY. CONDO TOWERS, INDIVIDUALS LIVING IN.
DOWNTOWN ACCEPT THE TRUTH THAT THEY'' RE IN–.
THEY LIVE IN A MIXED USAGE OF. COMMERCIAL, BRILLIANT INDICATORS, LIT SIGNS, RAILWAY–.
THE METHOD THE BYLAW IS. WRITTEN NOW, SPLITTING UP FROM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BUT FROM.
A CONDOMINIUM–.
IF THAT'' S A RESIDENTIAL SDPRIKT THEN THE SOLUTION TOO.
YOUR CONCERN IS YES BUT IN.
MIDTOWN MAYBE ALSO ZONED COMMERCIAL, IF YOU.
UNDERSTAND THE MIDTOWN–.
>> > > I'KNOW, I ' M SLIGHTLY OFF SUBJECT RIGHT HERE. THEN WHAT WOULD THE DISTANCE.
BE FROM ONE OF THESE– FROM THE BACK OF ONE OF THESE.
SIGNS TO THE CLOSEST WIN DEPOT?
>> > > THE BACK? AGAIN AS LONG AS THE SIGN IS.
STATED–.
AS LONG AS THE INDICATOR IS NOT FACING INTO THE CONDOMINIUM, THE.
BACK MUST BE NO CONCERN. IF WE BACK ONTO THE WALL SURFACE OF A CONDOMINIUM TOUSHGS AGAINST A.
CONCRETE WALL SURFACE OF A CONDO.
TOWER AND WE BACK RIGHT ONTO IT, BUT THE INDICATOR IS DEALING WITH.
ONWARD AND IS NOT VISIBLE,.
THAT'' S BEEN PERFORMED WITH EXISTING BILLBOARDS TODAY. WE SEE NO DIFFERENCE FOR A.
DIGITAL BILLBOARD TO BE BACKING ONTO A RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, AS.
LONG AS IT'' S ZONED AS WELL AS. COMMERCIAL, AS LONG AS THE INDICATION IS ZONED ALLOWS FOR IT TO.
BE ZONED THERE, COMMERCIAL.
INDUSTRIAL AS WELL AS DOES NOT IMPACT RESIDENTIAL BEFORE THE.
INDICATION, WE SEE NO ISSUE.
>> > > GOOD, THANKS EXTREMELY MUCH.

>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: MANY THANKS,.
ALDERMAN POOTMANS. ALDERMAN FARRELL? >> > > THANK YOU. I HAVE A NUMBER OF INQUIRIES.
AND I WILL LIKELY GO OVER SO I'' LL SIMPLY QUIT WHEN TWELVE NOON COMES. > > ALL RIGHT, DID YOU DO THE.
LANGEVIN BRIDGE? IT LOOKS TERRIFIC WHEN.
LIT, THERE WAS FAIRLY QUICK.
CHANGEOVER OF COLOUR AS WELL AS WE RECOGNIZED RELATIVELY EARLY THAT.
IT WAS DISTRACTING TO DRIVERS.
AS WELL AS INDIVIDUALS WERE REALLY GOING WITH THE TRAFFIC CONTROL SO.
WE TONED IT DOWN QUITE A LITTLE BIT. AT WHAT FACTOR DO WE KNOW THAT SOMETHING BECOMES A.
DISTRACTION AND AFTERWARDS MAKE A.
QUICK CHANGE? I THINK THE CONCERN THAT I SEE.
IS THE MODERN TECHNOLOGY IS RELATIVELY.
NEW.IT ' S CERTAINLY NEW TO CALGARY. AND SECURITY FOR DRIVERS IS.
CRITICAL AND COMFORT FOR OUR HOMEOWNERS IS ALSO PARAMOUNT. SO AT WHAT FACTOR DO WE UNDERSTAND.
WHEN WE'' RE DEVELOPING A DRIVING DISTURBANCE AND ALSO
ARE ABLE TO. > > I AGREE WITH YOU
THAT.
DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT CAME AS.
PRE-PROGRAMED TO MEET THE ROUTINE SO THERE WAS SOME.
FLASHING WHICH WE CLAIMED THIS IS.
NOT ACCEPTABLE AND IT HAS TO BE TRANSFORMED, IN THE MEANTIME WHAT IT IS,.
IT'' S LIKE 06 SECONDLY. TRANSITIONS WE HAVE GIVEN AND ALSO THERE IS NO FLASHING OR SUDDEN.
ADJUSTMENT. IT'' S ALL– LIKE IT ' S SEAMLESS SHIFT SO THAT MEANS ANYONE WHO.
IS DRIVING OR ANYONE WHO IS.
STAYING IN THE BORDERING HOUSE IS NOT.
DISRUPTED BY THE LIGHTING. THE CONCEPT BELOW IS THAT INDIVIDUALS MUST APPRECIATE REMAINING IN THE.
ENVIRONMENT INSTEAD OF.
OBTAINING, YOU UNDERSTAND, DISRUPTED OR CREATING SAFETY ISSUES. TO MAKE SURE THAT HAS BEEN FIXED, BUT.
YES WE HAD CHANGED THAT FROM 2 SEC TO 60 SECTS AS WELL AS IT.
> > O.K., THANK YOU. NOW, MY PROBLEM ASIDE FROM THE.
SIDETRACKED DRIVER, SINCE WHEN I WAS TAUGHT TO DRIVE, I.
WAS TOLD DRIVE WHEN YOU'' RE. DRIVING AS WELL AS CURRENTLY I THINK THERE ' S KIND OF A GENERAL.
IDEA THAT YOU CAN DO ALL.
KIND OF OTHER MATTERS WHILE YOU'' RE DRIVING. SO DURING OF PERMANENT.
POLICIES, WE REQUIREMENT TO KNOW WHEN THESE DETAILS ARE DISTRACTING T.
THEY'' RE MEANT TO DISTRACT TO A.
CERTAIN FACTOR, AND JUST HOW MUCH I IS–.
JUST HOW MUCH INTERRUPTION IS.
REASONABLE? AND ALSO I'' M UNCERTAIN IF WE KNOW.
THE RESPONSE TO THAT, BECAUSE. THE ACTION I ' M HEARING IS ANY RESEARCH STUDIES ARE INCLUSIVE. SO– BUT I THINK THAT ' S A. WHOLE POINT OF HAVING MEANTIME PROCEDURES, IS WE CAN CONTINUE.
TO RESEARCH STUDY IT FURTHER.
>> > > SO AS FOR SDWRESH WHOMEVER WANTS TO ANSWER THAT.
IS PENALTY. AND I'' M UNCERTAIN IF WE INTEND TO HAVE THAT ANSWERED AFTER NOONTIME. THREE MINS?
>> > > WE ARE CONTINUING WITH THE SOLUTION? O.K..
>> > > MAYBE I'' LL CLARIFY THAT.A VARIETY OF CITIES ACROSS.
NORTH AMERICA, VERY LARGE.
CITIES, HAVE OUTLAWED THESE DETAILS OUTRIGHT. > > OUR PROOF IS THE.
CONTRARY. WHICH'' S WHY WE ' RE.
OFFERING THE PACKAGE AND YOU. CONTAINER SEE THAT 40 STATES ALLOW THESE INDICATIONS, A SUBSTANTIAL.
VARIETY OF STATES, A VARIETY OF.
STESMTS AND A WHOLE LOT OF CITIES THAT WE FOUND THAT WERE BANNED.
CURRENTLY PROHIBITED BILLBOARDS IN.
GENERAL. THEY'' VE ALREADY JUST TAKEN. IT THE ALL-NATURAL STEP, THEY.
ALREADY DON'' T ALLOW BILLBOARDS SO THEY ' RE NOT GOING TO ALLOW.
LITTLE BOARDS AS WELL. IN THOSE CITIES THAT MAY HAVE PROHIBITED DIGITAL WE DON'' T KNOW.
OF ANY THAT HAVE OUTLAWED IT. DUE TO THE FACT THAT OF THE SAVOR DISTRACTION PROBLEM.
THE DIFFICULTY, AND ALSO I ' LL LET. BRUCE FOLLOW UP ALSO, THERE ' S NUMEROUS DISTRACTIONS. BOTH INSIDE AND ALSO OUTSIDE THE.
> > THERE ' S A GREAT DEAL, CONCURRED. AND ALSO THAT'' S WHY THE RESEARCH STUDIES HAVE ACTUALLY POSSIBLY FOUND THEM TO BE.
INCLUSIVE. THE RESEARCHES COME BACK AND ALSO SAY THEY'' RE SECURITY NEUTRAL,.
THEY'' RE NO VARIOUS THAN A. REQUIREMENT SIGNBOARD, NO VARIOUS THAN A TIM HORTON'' S. ID SIGN, NO VARIOUS THAN A. CITY INDICATION THAT SAYS 300m EXIT FOR BARLOW ROUTE. AND ALSO VARIOUS OTHER RESEARCHES HAVE ACTUALLY SHOWN–.
AND AFTER THAT CERTAINLY THERE'' S NUMEROUS DISTRACTIONS INSIDE.
THE AUTOMOBILE AND ALSO OF PROGRAM SOME.
TERRITORIES, AS ALBERTA HAS DONE ALSO, IS THE CELLULAR.
PHONE CERTAINLY AND IT'' S. COMING FOR YOU CURRENTLY BEFORE– SO IN SOLUTION TO YOUR QUESTION,.
THERE''
S–. THE INTERRUPTION HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN EFFECTIVELY TO BE–.
FOR BILLBOARDS, WHETHER STANDING.
FIXED– WHETHER CONVENTIONAL OR.
DIGITAL. VIDEO CLIP YES, THERE HAVE BEEN RESEARCH STUDIES THAT PROGRAM THAT VIDEO.
MOTION–.
A RESEARCH STUDY WAS DONE BY A GIRL FOR TORONTO ACTUALLY, SIX.
BILLBOARDS, AMONG THE STUDIES.
WE PRESENTED TO ADMINISTRATION, AND THEY RETURNED AND.
ENDED THAT OF COURSE, THE VIDEO.
MOVEMENT GAERNED EVEN MORE INTEREST BUT THAT'' S NEVER BEEN
>> OUR.

NEED. > > O.K., THANK YOU.SO THERE ' S A BIG DISTINCTION.
BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL AND ALSO.
HOME UNIT. AND I LEAVE ALDERMAN POOTMANS.
TO ASK THAT CONCERN, BUT IT''. IT ' S– WE ' RE DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN.
THE RIGHT TO LIVE WITHOUT.
LIGHT TRESPASS FOR MULTI-FAMILY AS WELL AS RESIDENTIAL.
DISTRICTS, WHICH ARE SINGLE.
FAMILY. AND ALSO I ASSUME THAT IS IT IS A.
PRETTY IMPORTANT POINT TO.
CLARIFY. I HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF CONCERNED.
INDIVIDUALS WHO–.
WE'' VE GOT PASSAGE RESEARCH STUDIES THROUGHOUT THE CITY IN WHICH.
WE'' RE TRYING TO ENCOURAGE.
INDIVIDUALS TO RELOCATE INTO FUTURE I HOUSEHOLD AND IN SOME WAY WE THINK.
THAT THEIR RIGHT TO DEAL WITH AND ALSO.
PEACEFUL AS WELL AS THOSE POINTS ARE DIFFERENT THAN THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF.
THOSE IN SINGLE FAMILY MEMBERS. AND ALSO I HAVE AN OBJECTION TO THAT. BUT MULTI-FAMILY–.
16th AVENUE, FOR INSTANCE, WE SPEND A LOT OF POWER, FAIR.
QUANTITY OF CASH CHANGING THE.
ZONING AND ALSO THE FEEL OF 16th AVENUE TO URGE.
MULTI-FAMILY. AND ALSO SO ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT THE RANGE NEEDS TO BE.
DIFFERENT FOR– SHOULD WE.
ENABLE AMONG THESE UNITS THROUGHOUT THE STREET AND EVEN.
> > SINCE IN THE LAW WHAT WE'' RE PROPOSING IS– YOUR.
SCENARIO JUST REFERRED TO AS A.
SIGN ORIENTATED AND ALSO FACING RESIDENTIAL SO IT WOULD HAVE.
AN IMPACT.
>> > > A HOME DEVICE

>>. > > YEAH, A RESIDENCE DEVICE. AND WHAT OUR THEY'' VE GONE THE.
EXTREME APPROACH. THESE ARE ALL INTERIM POLICIES SO.
WE ARE GOING TO BE SITTING.
DOWN AS YOU KNOW OVER THE NEXT TWELVE MONTHS AND ALSO OUR WORRY.
IS THEY'' VE TAKEN THE EXTREME.
STRATEGY OF 300m FROM A BUILDING INCLUDED OR RESIDENCE.
UNIT AND ALSO AS WE USE INSTANCES.
THROUGHOUT OUR DISCUSSION WAS IF An INDICATION IS NOT VISIBLE.
AND ALSO TOPOGRAPHY OBSTRUCTS THE SIGN.
WE COULD BE LOWER AND– OR THE RESIDENTIAL COULD BE.
LOWER, BELOW THE QUALITY, IF.
IT'' S NOT NOTICEABLE, THEN WHY IS THE CITY BEING IF YOU WILL.
DISABLED KEEPING THAT STRAIGHT.
300m WITH NO SENSE OF DISCRETION, NO FEELING OF EVEN.
ENABLING IT TO BE RELAXED? THEY'' VE MADE IT VERY CLEAR.SO IF WE'' RE ALONG 16th Opportunity.
And Also 16th Opportunity MULTI-FAMILY.
TEND TO BE JUST BEHIND, THERE'' S USUALLY INDUSTRIAL ON.
BOTH SIDES OF 16th Opportunity, IN.
MY EXPERIENCE– >> > > WELL, 16th Opportunity HAS BEEN.
COMPLETELY REZONED TO.
ENCOURAGE FAIRLY SUBSTANTIAL ZONING. IT BELONGED TO THE WHOLE–.
IT PREDATES PREPARING BUT IT RESULTED IN OUR CONTEMPORARY VIEW.
OF AN URBAN CORRIDOR, IN WHICH.
EVERY ONE OF 16th Method IS HIGH THICKNESS RESIDENTIAL.
>> > > WELL, IT'' S VOTED SITUATION BY. CASE.
WE CHECKED OUT IT'INSTANCE BY INSTANCE. BUT IT ' S EXTREMELY EASY FOR US. IF THE INDICATION IS ON 16th method THAT WE'' RE RECOMMENDING AND ALSO IT.
ENCOUNTERS RIGHT INTO RESIDENTIAL, THE.
EXISTING LAW DOES NOT ALLOW IT AS WELL AS WE WOULD NOT ALLOW IT.

> > IT ' S IT ' S SOMETHING WE DO NOW. > > A GREAT DEAL OF THESE REALLY TECHNICAL PROBLEMS WITH REGARDS.
> > I AGREE WITH YOU
THAT. > > THERE ' S A WHOLE LOT, AGREED. > > OK, THANK YOU.SO THERE ' S A BIG DISTINCTION.YOU'' RE EXPRESSION HOW TO PROTECT THAT? MY SUGGESTION WAS TAKE A.
MEASUREMENT FROM THE FRONT OF.
THE INDICATION, GO 100m, IF THERE'' S NO RESIDENTIAL WITHIN 100m. SDWRESH AS WELL AS BY RESIDENTIAL.
YOU'' RE TALKING ABOUT DWELLING PUPILS > > RESIDENCE UNIT,.
SORRY F THERE'' S A HOUSE. SYSTEM WITHIN 100m OF THE INDICATION UNOBSTRUCTED AFTER THAT THE.
BILLBOARD NEEDS TO NOT BE.
ALLOWED.

>> > > I HAVE A PAIRS OF OTHER–.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: WE'' RE. GOING TO QUIT THERE, LUNCH BREAK, LUNCH BREAK. WE'' LL BE BACK AT 1:20. ALDERMAN FARRELL, YOU WILL STILL HAVE THE FLOOR. ALL? CAPTIONING OF THIS CONFERENCE IS PROVIDED AS An INTERACTION.
ACCESS ACTION AND ALSO IS.
NOT INTENDED AS A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE PROCESS. IT MAY if MISTAKES OCCUR.
BE CHARGE TO PERSON MISTAKE, TECHNOLOGICAL TROUBLES.
OR AN FAILURE ON THE PART.
OF THE WRITER TO LISTEN TO OR UNDERSTAND.
WHAT IS BEING CLAIMED. WHILE BEST EFFORTS ARE MADE TO FILE AS CLOSELY AS.
POSSIBLE WHAT IS BEING SAID,.
CERTIFIED EXACT DOCUMENT OF THE PROCEDURES. CAPTIONING OF THIS MEETING IS.
GIVEN AS An INTERACTION ACCESS ACTION, AS WELL AS IS.
NOT INTENDED AS A VERBATIM.
RECORDS OF THE PROCEDURES. IF INACCURACIES OCCUR, IT MAY BE.
DUE TO HUMAN BEING ERROR, TECHNICAL.
PROBLEMS OR AN INABILITY FOR THE WRITER TO HEAR.
OR UNDERSTAND WHAT IS BEING.
CLAIMED. WHILE BEST INITIATIVES ARE MADE TO.
DOCUMENT AS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE.
WHAT IS BEING SAID, THE SUBTITLES CONTAINER NOT BE DEPENDED UPON AS A.
CERTIFIED ACCURATE RECORD OF THE.
PROCESS.

>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: AS WELL AS.
WE'' RE BACK. [> Faint] > > THANK'YOU.
I THINK I ' M DOWN TO ONE EVEN MORE. THIS IS A QUICK ONE.
SQUARE IN TORONTO IN WHICH THEY'' VE.
GOT– DUNDAS SQUARE.
I RECOGNIZE WE ' VE BEEN TALKING–. COMPONENT OF THE CENTRE CITY GROUP HAS.
BEEN TALKING ABOUT CHANGING THE RULES TO ALLOW CONCENTRATED LOCATION. OF THE DOWNTOWN WHERE WE WOULD. KICK BACK OUR INDICATION BYLAW WITHIN SPECIFIC CRITERIA.
> > TODAY, NO. THE FIRST ACTION IS SET OF GUIDELINES.
AS WELL AS GUIDELINES THAT BOTH MANAGEMENT AND SECTOR CAN.
WORK WITH JUST TODAY REGULATION.
FOR DIGITAL WHICH ARE STATIC. I ASSUME THAT WE'' RE REFERRING TO.
THE DUNDASS AND ALSO TIMES SQUARES OF.
> > I HEARD IT BROUGHT UP
BY. > > ONE DAY THAT MAY COME UP. AS OF TODAY NO, THERE'' S NO TALK OF IT, NO ASSIGNED AREA.
STAKEHOLDERS, LANDLORDS, DOWNTOWN COMPANY ORGANIZATION,.
THOSE KIND OF MATTERS WHICH.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN FARRELL. WE ' LL LET ALDERMAN DEMONG
GET. >'> AND ALSO I REALIZE IT ' S MY SOMEWHAT IGNORANCE WITH REGARDS.
REFERRAL TO THE OLD-STYLE.
BILLBOARD WHERE WE SHONE A BIG LIMELIGHT ON THE BILLBOARD HOW.
THAT CONTRASTS TO THE 5,000.
FLASH, 200 NITS THAT YOU'' RE OFFERING.
>> > >'IT ' S 5,000 NITS DURING THE. DAY AND ALSO 500 AT NIGHT ARE THE OPTIMUM LEVELS ALLOWED.
>> > > BILLBOARDS, IT WOULD BE LESS,.
MUCH LESS COMPARED TO DIGITAL. BECAUSE THERE IS NO DIMMING IN.
INSTANCE OF– IT'' S NOT BUMPED UP.
DURING THE DAYTIME. >> > > THAT ' S CORRECT.
IT IS– THE ILLUMINATION IS NOT. MADE TO BE POTENTIALLY LOWER OR HIGHER, JUST A STRAIGHT.
HALOTHANE BULB.
>> > > I REALIZE THAT. IN MY OWN MIND I ' M
TRYING TO.
ENVISION WHETHER THE. BRIGHTNESS– I RECOGNIZE THROUGHOUT THE DAY IT'' S NOT GOING TO MAKE A. GREAT DEAL OF DIFFERENCE. BUT AT EVENING IS IT GOING TO MAKE A WHOLE LOT OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN.
THE 500 NITS YOU'' RE ALLOWED AND. THE LUMINENCE OF THE SPOTLIGHTED BILLBOARD STANDARD.
>> IF YOU ' RE EXAMINING THE, > >.
DIGITAL WITH THE CONVENTION, THERE IS A DISTINCTION. THE DIGITAL IS A LOT MORE.
BRIGHTER COMPARED TO THE CONVENTIONAL.
>> > > OK. THAT VIRTUALLY ANSWERS THAT.NOW, I WAS

CURIOUS, YOU GUYS HAD.
TWO DIFFERENT SCREENS GOING.
WITH REGARDS TO THE CHANGING OF THE– ON YOUR DIGITALS. THE FIRST ONE THAT WAS GOING.
WITH NEAR– I'' M UNCERTAIN WHERE IT WAS AND ALSO THE SECOND ONE.
WHERE YOU HAD THEM SIDE BY SIDE. WAS THERE A DISTINCTION IN THE TIME STRUCTURE IN THE ALTERING OF.
THE PICTURES BETWEEN THOSE TWO?
>> > > YES. INDEED, THERE IS A CONSIDERABLE.
DISTINCTION WHICH'' S WHY WE
. BELIEVE THE DIGITAL'' S A MARKED RENOVATION.
>> > > NO, JUST SO I'' M CLEAR, THE. INITIAL DIGITAL THA THAT YOU SD United States VERSUS THE SECOND DIGITAL YOU.
SHOWED United States, WAS THERE A.
DIFFERENCE? WAS ONE A. 2 SECOND ADJUSTMENT AND.
THE SECONDLY ONE WAS A. 8 SECOND.
CHANGE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT OR DID YOU PEOPLE MAKE KEEP IN MIND OF IT AT.
ALL?
>> > > NO, WE DIDN'' T MAKE NOTE. BUT MY UNDERSTANDING IS ALL THE.
INDICATORS WE'' VE ORDERED ARE ON THE. SAME DESIGN AND SHIFT TIME.
IN EDMONTON, AND THE VERY FIRST ONE WE SHOWED McKNIGHT.
BOULEVARD THAT WE'' RE PROVING.
SHOULD BE OPERATING ON THE SAME CONCEPT.
>> > > THEY WERE OPERATING ON THE.
EXACT SAME PRINCIPLE.IT ALMOST APPEARED LIKE THERE WAS. A DIFFERENCE TO MY EYE, ONE.
ONE. > > YES.
AS WELL AS PERHAPS ONE >> IS OFF A BIT. IT CONTAINER BE INSPECTED. NO, I DON ' T HAVE THAT ANSWER. SINCE THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT. INDICATIONS, 2 DIFFERENT CITIES, SET UP AT TWO DIFFERENT. TIMES. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THEY WERE DESIGNED TO BE RUNNING THE SAME. MODEL NO MATTER WHERE THEY.
WHEN THEY ' RE ORDERED, are OR. > > THAT McKNIGHT INDICATOR IS 6. >> SECONDS. WE ' VE INSPECTED
AND RECHECKED. > > I IMPLY THE CHANGE TIME. >> IN BETWEEN THE CHANGING OF THE.
IMAGES. >> > > THEY MUST COINCIDE.
>> > > ALL RIGHT. THANKS.
>> NICE AND EASY. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:. MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN DEMONG. ALDERMAN STEVENSON.
DO YOU CURRENTLY HAVE 2 INDICATORS. THAT GET ON AIRPORT PROPERTY. IS THAT? ONE ON BARLOW AND ONE >> ON AIRPORT TERMINAL. PATH? > > FOR DIGITAL, CORRECT.
WE HAVE A VARIETY OF SIGNS ON.
AIRPORT TERMINAL LAND.
BUT ONLY 2 INDICATIONS, CORRECT, ONE. ON AIRPORT TRAIL AND ONE AT.
BARLOW PATH AND ALSO FLIGHT TERMINAL ROAD, THE ENTRY INTO THE AIRPORT.
ARE 2 AREAS THAT HAVE.
> > SO NEITHER ONE OF THEM. NEITHER ONE OF THOSE WILL BE ABLE TO REMAIN THEN? > > THAT– THE LAWS OF.
AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY, AS YOU'' RE POSSIBLY CONSCIOUS OF, AND SO.
WE GOT DIRECTED BY THE.
AIRPORT.WE APPLIED TO THE

CITY AS WELL AS THE.
CITY PROVIDED US A PENALT AUTHORIZATION RESTRICTION.
THE AIRPORT TERMINAL'' S RECOMMENDATION. THE LAW TODAY, WHATEVER IS.
PASSED TODAY WOULD NOT EFFECT.
THOSE INDICATORS CURRENTLY OR LATER. >> > > I CAN UNDERSTAND THE ONE AT.
BARLOW ROUTE AND AIRPORT TERMINAL ROAD. DUE TO THE FACT THAT THAT'' S ON– IT ' S NOT FACING A CITY ROAD.
THE ONE THAT ' S ON FLIGHT TERMINAL. ROUTE OR 96th', IT SAYS IN BELOW THAT THEY
' LL BE PROHIBITED FROM.
96th AVENUE AT HARVEST HILLS. OVER TO BARLOW ROUTE. THAT WOULD TAKE THAT
>> IN,. WOULDN ' T IT'? SINCE IT ' S ON FLIGHT TERMINAL LANDS, > > IN THIS INSTANCE IT DOESN ' T.
AND HAS A DIFFERENT LAND USAGE. CONTRACT. ALL OTHER LANDS OUTSIDE OF.
AIRPORT TERMINAL LANDS WOULD MEET THAT. CONTAINER NOT CONSTRUCT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FLIGHT TERMINAL TRAIL. THEY ' RE ALL PERSONAL LANDS AND.
LANDS UP. > > THANK YOU.THANK YOU, YOUR WORSHIP. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU, ALDERMAN STEVENSON. PEOPLE, I BELIEVE WE'' RE DONE WITH.
YOU IN THE MEANTIME. THANK YOU SIGNIFICANTLY.
WE ' RE STILL IN THE GENERAL PUBLIC. HEARING, THOUGH, SO IS THERE. ANY PERSON ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK AGAINST THIS? ANYBODY ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO.
>> SPEAK IN RESISTANCE? THERE WAS NO PERSON THAT TALKED IN.
FAVOUR. > > I ' M SIMPLY GOING TO LEAVE SOMETHING HERE. SOMEONE THAT IS IN FAVOUR OF.
OUR SETTING, YOUR PRAISE, AND PARTICIPANTS OF LITTLE. SHE'WAS UNABLE TO STAY FOR THE. AFTERNOON SESSION.
>> I HAVE 35 COPIES HER. PRESENTATION.
SHE ' S WITH >> THE MIDTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: BE CAN.
DISPERSE THOSE.O > > YOUR PRAISE, MEMBERS OF. COUNCIL, MY NAME IS OWEN CRAIG,.
I ' M WITH BELTLINE PLANNING TEAM. >'> Mayor Naheed Nenshi: O.K., PLEASE DISTRIBUTE THOSE. > > THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
I ' D LIKE TO USE AND
BE IN ADVANCE AND INDICATE I ' D SUCHES AS TO UTILIZE AN. OVERAVERAGING BROAD DESCRIPTION. OF OUR POSITION ON SIGNBOARD AND VEHICULAR SCALED 3RD EVENT. ADVERTISING AS WELL AS DRILL DOWN ON.
THE DETAILS AND COME DOWN ON THE'CONCERNS AVAILABLE FOR THE AMENDMENT. PROPOSED. , if YOU ' LL ALLOW ME THAT INDULGENCE I ' D LIKE TO THAT.. I WILL CERTAINLY READ FROM THE LETTER THAT.
I PREPARED.BELT LINE PLANNING'GROUP.
MIRRORS BELTLINE NEIGHBORHOOD ' S. BEST UNDERSTANDING OF THE MAJORITY PERSPECTIVE ON. SIGNBOARDS. THIS VIEW IS GARNERED FROM 10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE OF NEIGHBORHOOD.
ASSISTANCE TO GET RID OF VEHICULAR.
SCALED 3RD PARTY ADVERTISING IN OUR DISTRICT. BELTLINE COMMUNITIES HAS.
USED A STUDY TO SHOW THE LEGITIMACY OF ITS POSITION. WE HAVE GOT HAD 149.
ACTIONS, OVERWHELMING IN AGREEMENT THAT BILLBOARDS.
DIGITAL OR OTHERWISE HAVE NO …
[Indistinct] IN THE BELTLINE. IT MOTIVATING THE CITY OF.
CALGARY TO RESTRICTION ALL VEHICULAR SCALED BILLBOARDS WITHIN THE.
BELTLINE COMMUNITY AREA. AS WELL AS I'' D LIKE TO BE EXTREMELY CLEAR, WE'' RE CONCENTRATING ON THE VEHICULAR.
SCALE SIGNBOARD SITUATION AND ALSO NOT.
THE BOOTH OR SMALLER COMPANY ORIENTED INDICATIONS. AS OUR AREA REMAINS TO.
FULLY GROWN AND ALSO COME TO BE MORE BLENDED USE, THE DEPLOYMENT OF THESE.
SIGNS RUNS COUNTER IN THE.
BLUEPRINT FOR THE BELTLINE, BELTLINE ARP AS WELL AS CITY CENTRE.
LAND USE DISTRICT. DISTRACTING LIGHT POLLUTION SENT OUT FROM THESE SIGNS HAS THE.
INFLUENCE TO LIMITATION THE NEIGHBORHOOD. NOW, IF YOU TAKE THAT AND AMPLIFY IT ON A RANGE OF 10 AND.
PLACE IT OUTSIDE A CONDOMINIUM.
THAT MAY HAVE 230 DEVICES, AT 1.5 PEOPLE PER DEVICE THAT FUNCTIONS OUT.
TO BE REGARDING 400 TO 500 LOCALS.
FAIRLY EASILY.THAT CAN BE EXPONENTIALLY MORE. FRUSTRATING.
AS WELL AS NOW IMAGINE A SINGLE FAMILY MEMBERS RESIDENCE OR DWELLING THAT HAS A SIGN.
EFFECTS ONE OR TW TWO OR 3,.
FOUR PEOPLE ON THE STREET, YOU PUT THAT IN THE BELTLINE IT CAN.
INFLUENCE 500 TO A THOUSAND PEOPLE.
WITH ONE INDICATION DESPITE ILLUMINATION. FURTHER VEHICULAR SCALED SCALED.
SIGNS ARE ENTIRELY UNDESIRABLE. BELTLINE HAS NO CONVERSATION IN.
REGULATORY OF DIGITAL COSTS.
BOARDS IN OUR AREA DISTRICT. THEY ARE DESIGNED TO CAPTURE.
INTEREST. THEY WOULD NOT BE UTILIZEDY.
SECTOR IF THAT WAS NOT THE.
INSTANCE. DESPITE THE TRUTH THE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IS.
NOT THERE, I THINK ALL OF US HAVE.
COMMON FEELING SUFFICIENT TO KNOW THERE IS AN INCLUDED DISTURBANCE TO.
THE DRIVERS AS WELL AS WHAT IS THE.
TIPPING POINT BETWEEN CELLPHONES, KIDS IN THE BACK AND ALSO.
WEBSITE TRAFFIC SIGNS RELATIVE TO.
DIGITAL SIGNS? AND ALSO WHAT I'' D LIKE TO ACCOMPLISH NOW IS. INDICATE WHILE OUR STANCE IS NOT.
ASSISTANCE THE MODIFICATION SIMPLY BECAUSE IT'' S A 3RD PARTY. CHANGE FOR THIRD CELEBRATION. ADVERTISING OF An AUTOMOBILE RANGE IN NATURE, WE ARE STRIVING TO.
CREATE SUITABLY SCALED.
GROWTHS IN THE CENTRE and beltline CITY. WE THINK THOSE KIND OF SIGNS ARE.
SUITABLE FOR CAR USE AS WELL AS EXCEPT AREAS THAT HAVE.
DEVELOPING BURGEONING PEDESTRIAN.
ENVIRONMENTS.SIMPLY PUT, THEY ARE A CURSE ON. OUR PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED URBAN.
AREA. I ' D LIKE TO
SHOW TO YOU A. COUPLE BLURB FROM THE.
WE HAD 149 PEOPLE RESPOND TO THE. 70 LIVED IN THE BELTLINE, 79.
THE BELTLINE. AND ALSO THIS IS LEADING TO THE.
QUESTION OF DIGITAL INDICATION.
PROLIVELATION AND SIGNBOARD PROLIFERATION AS A WHOLE. LOOKING FOR OF THE RELAXATION TO 150.
METRES. REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU CAN.
SEE THE INDICATION OR NOT THE INDICATORS.
HAVE A EMOTIONAL AS WELL AS PEDESTRIAN RANGE EFFECT ON.
NEIGHBOURHOODS THAT WE THINK ARE.
UNSUITABLE FOR LOCATIONS THAT WE ARE TRYING TO MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO DEVELOP.
TOP QUALITY PEDESTRIAN SCALE.
WE THINK IT'' S HIGH TIME THAT
THE. EVOLVE SUCH THAT WE CAN PUSH THOSE INDICATIONS TO OTHER AREAS.
COURSE APPRECIATE THE SIGNAGE THAT RECOGNIZES A SHOP,.
ORGANIZATION OR MEDICAL OFFICE. THE BILLBOARDS, HOWEVER, ARE AN EYE SORES AS WELL AS A SAFETY AND SECURITY THREAT. THIS IS ESPECIALLY RESPECT TO.
DIGITAL BILLBOARDS DETERMINED BY WITH EVER CHANGING MATERIAL AS WELL AS.
DESIGN THEY ADDITIONALLY MODIFY THE WHOLE.
APPEARANCE OF THE COMMUNITY IN AN EVER NEW METHOD AND DOWNSIDE.
METHOD. THERE ARE BUILDING GUIDELINES FOR NEW STRUCTURE.
WHICH ARE NEGATIVELY INFLUENCED BY.
THE BILLBOARDSES.BILLBOARDS DETRACT AND WOULDN ' T. BE PERMITTED BY OTHER.
COMMUNITIES.
EITHER SMALLER SCALED.
ADS OR BETTER RANGE.
ADVERTISEMENMENTS OUGHT TO QUESTIN ENCOURAGED.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
> > THANTHANTHANK YOU FOR BEING O.
PATIENT PERSON AFTERNOONMID-DAY I KNOW THAT THESE CONTAINER TAKE SOME TIME.
IS REALLY EVEN MORE CENTRED AROUND DIGITAL VERSUS NONDIGITAL.
SIGNS, NOT NECESSARILY WHERE.
IT OUGHT TO BE IN REGARDS TO THE AREA BUT REALLY THE DIGITAL.
VERSUS NONDIGITAL ARGUMENT. I APPRECIATE YOUR REMARKS. HAVE I A PAIR FOLLOWUP.
CONCERNS. IN YOUR DISCUSSION A MOMENT A LITTLE YOU HAD ACTUALLY RECOMMENDED THE.
BELTLINE AREA ASSOCIATION.
WOULD BE OPPOSED TO AUTOMOBILE-SCALED SIGNS. THE STANDARD 10 FEET BY.
20 FEET? 10 FEET BY 20 SIGNS IN THE.
BELTLINE DISTRICT OVERALL,.
WHETHER OR NOT IT IS A FIXED PAPER INDICATION OR THOSE SLICKY.
TRIANGULAR ONES OR DIGITAL. INDICATOR, WHETHER IT ' S DIGITAL OR NOT DIGITAL RIGHT CURRENTLY YOU ' RE.
REALLY JUST SAYING THAT IN YOUR.
PARTICULAR LOCATION, IN THE BELTLINE, AS A RESULT OF THE. DENSITY, AND AS A RESULT OF THE. EFFECT THAT IT HAS AESTHETICALLY ON MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTS REGARDLESS.
OF THE KIND OF– YOU'' RE IN.

>> OPPOSITION. > > CORRECT. ALTHOUGH I ATTEMPTED TO CONNECT IT BACK. TO SPECIFICS RELATED TO DIGITAL SIGNS, BUT YES. THE OVERARCHING–.
>> > > AND ALSO THAT WAS MY REMARK. AND ALSO JUST, ONCE MORE, BECAUSE THIS IS.
SPECIFICALLY REGARDING DIGITAL, I.
JUST WISHED TO REMIND YOU OF THAT AND ALSO GET YOUR REMARKS. THANK YOU REALLY MUCH FOR THAT.
INFORMATION. THANKS, YOUR PRAYER.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN MAR. ALDERMAN CHABOT?
>> > > MANY THANKS, YOUR WORSHIP. I ' M SORRY, I LISTENED TO YOUR NAME A FEW TIMES BUT I STILL DIDN ' T OBTAIN.
>> IT. >> > > OWEN CRAIG. > > SO CRAIG BEING THE SURNAME. >'> CORRECT, YES. I ' VE HAD THAT TROUBLE WITH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS ALL THE MEANS UP.
TO APPARENTLY ALDERMEN NOW, BUT.
> > IN FACT I BELIEVE YOU
TOLD INFORMED. Mr. CRAIG, SO, THE EXISTING BILLBOARDS, YOU ' RE NOT EXTREMELY.
PLEASED WITH THOSE EITHER.
>> > > CORRECT. WE ' RE NOT ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT.
THEM. WE'' RE IN A POSITION WHERE THE BELTLINE IS DEVELOPING FAR FASTER. THAN THE BYLAW CAN. TO AID OFFER BETTER SUITED GUIDELINES FOR HOME UNITS IN.
PROXIMITY TO THESE TYPES OF.
SIGN. >> > > SO IF THEY ' RE ILLUMINATED, IT
. POSITIONS A SIMILAR CHALLENGE TO.
WHAT THE DIGITAL SIGNS COULD– >> > > CORRECT. YEP.
>> > > YOU REFER TO THE OVERANXIOUS– OR OVER ABUNDANT.
NETWORK CHANGER. WHAT'' S BEING RECOMMENDED RIGHT HERE IS A STATIC DISPLAY SCREEN WITH.
POSSIBLY SIX-SECOND.
PERIODS, WHAT'' S PROPOSED IS 10-SECOND PERIODS. IT WOULDN'' T REALLY PARTNER. THAT WITH FULL MOVEMENT VIDEO AS WELL AS AN ABUNDANT NETWORK CHANGER. I ASSUME THAT COULD BE A LITTLE.
EXTREME, WOULDN'' T YOU >> SAY? > > WELL, DEPENDING ON HOW FAST.
YOU ALTER CHANNELS, IT LOOKS.
IF YOU CATCH ONE FRAME PER SECOND, quite CALCULATED TO ME. THE PICTURE IS THE STRAIGHTFORWARD.
EXAMPLE OF IS YOU HAVE ACTUALLY AN ILLUMINATED ITEM OUTSIDE A.
HOUSE HOME WINDOW AS WELL AS THEY'' RE
NOT. IN CONTROL OF WHAT ' S BEING SHOWN. THEY WATCH OUT THEIR WINDOW AT.
ANY POINT IN THE DAY AND HAVE NO OPTION OR ABILITY TO GET USED TO.
THAT. WE THINK THERE ARE SOME PARALLELS, WHILE THEY MAY NOT BE.
EXACTLY DIRECT, I ASSUME THE.
EXAMPLE IS STILL VALID.

>> > > YOU MENTIONED HUMAN-SCALE.
PEDESTRIAN-TYPE OF GROWTH. ARE YOU BY VIRTUE OF STATING THAT ARGUING THAT THERE''
S NO. PEDESTRIAN FUNCTIONALITY.
LINKED WITH WHAT YOU CALL CAR ORIENTED TYPE.
SIGNBOARDS?
>> > > THE SIGNAGE IS ESTABLISHED BY MARKET TO BE DEPLOYED AT.
HIGH-CAPACITY VEHICLE.
THOROUGHFARES. THEIR SIZE, PROXIMITY, DENSITY.
AND SCALE OF ADVERTISING AND MARKETING KIND.
FONT STYLE AND ALSO THE METHOD THEY USAGE FOR THE DUPLICATE IS PARTICULARLY.
TARGETED TOWARDS VEHICLES AND ALSO.
NOT PEDESTRIANS AND I BELIEVE THAT WE'' D BE MISLEADING OURSELVES TO.
THINK OTHERWISE. ARE CONCERN AT HAND WITH– OUR PROBLEM AT HAND WITH THOSE IS.
WHILE WE DON'' T REJECT.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING THAT'' S OF THE PEDESTRIAN'RANGE THAT ' S BEEN. CREATED FOR INDIVIDUALS TO SEE ON.
THE PATHWAY, WE THINK OUR NEIGHBOURHOODS HAVE MATURED.
SPECIALTY THE BELTLINE SO THE.
ELECTRIC MOTOR CAR IS N NO LONGER THE PREDOMINANT MARKETING.
DEMOGRAPHIC.
>> > > GUESS IT'' S A MATTER OF OPINION DUE TO THE FACT THAT I WOULD ARGUE I.
SEE UPPER LEGS BILLBOARDS A GREAT DEAL MORE.
WHEN I'' M STROLLING THAN I DO WHEN I'' M DRIVING. BUT THAT'' S ME DIRECTLY. I APPRECIATE YOUR DISCUSSION BELOW THESE DAYS AND ARTICULATING THE.
VIEWPOINT OF YOUR AREA. > > IF I MIGHT, YOUR PRAISE,.
YOU'' RE A PEDESTRIAN IS IN TRUTH. THE TREASURE AT THE HEART OF THE CONVERSATION AND THAT'' S
THE. TROUBLE THAT WE DO HAVE AS THE.
BELTLINE IS AS INDIVIDUALS SLOW DOWN AS WELL AS WALK, IT'' S NOT ONLY. SOMETHING THAT INFLUENCES VEHICLE DRIVER.
SECURITY AND LIGHTING. THAT'' S A VERY EXCELLENT EXAMPLE OF.
>> OUR DISAGREEMENT. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANKS, Mr. CRAIG. ALDERMAN FARRELL?
>> > > THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE THESE DAYS, Mr. CRAIG. SO YOU SEE A DISTINCTION BETWEEN.
> > CURRENTLY, THE BELTLINE
, I ' D BE. YOU ' RE FRETTED ABOUT THE
. MIGRATION OF EXISTING BILLBOARD.
SIGNAGE TO DIGITAL OR PROLIFERATION? I WEAR'' T THINK WITH THESE
REGULATIONS. WE WOULD ALLOW ADDITIONAL. BUT MAYBE THAT'' S SOMETHING TO BE.
CLARIFIED.
>> > >'WE ' RE CONCERNED ABOUT I ASSUME ONE EXTREMELY IMPORTANTLY, YES, THE.
SPREADING, CONVERSION OF.

EXISTING INDICATORS TO DIGITAL.WE ' RE CONCERNED ABOUT AS OUR.
AREA DEVELOPS AS WELL AS.
RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENCE PROJECTS ARE BROUGHT ON LINE IN.
DIFFERENT PARTS OF THEBELT LINE.
THE CAPACITY TO– FOR THE LAW TO MAINTAIN PACE WITH THIS IS.
PROBLEMATIC. THE PARTICULAR CHANGE TODAY ON THE TABLE THAT WE'' RE. PARTICULARLY OBJECTING TO IS THE.
LEISURE OR RELAXABLE DEMAND OF THE CLOSENESS TO.
DWELLING UNITS. WE DON'' T THINK THAT LINE OF VISION IS A REQUIRED REQUIREMENT.
ALTHOUGH IT'' S MORE OBJECTIONABLE.
THAN NOT. IT'' S MORE An IDEA OF.
EXPANSION THROUGHOUT THE.
NEIGHBOURHOOD IN ADDITION TO MOTORIST INTERRUPTION. THE 300 METRE RELAXATION AND.
TH THE DISTINCTION, WE DON'' T THINK THERE SHOULD BE A. DIFFERENCE MADE ON DENSITY. YOU HAVE MORE INDIVIDUALS HOVERING OVER THOSE INDICATORS THAN YOU PERFORM IN.
A RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN.
NEIGHBORHOOD.

>> > > A FEW OF THOSE NOR SUBURBAN.
COMMUNITIES WOULD HAVE A BERM,.
FOR EXAMPLE, SEPARATING THE SIGN FROM THE RESIDENTIAL. HOW LOTS BILLBOARDS DO YOU.
HAVE IN THE BELTLINE? >> > > WE RECENTLY CARRIED OUT A.
MAPPING STUDY, IT'' S AVAILABLE ON.
OUR WEBSITE, BELTLINE.CA. WE MAPPED BETWEEN 25 AND 36.
SIGNBOARDS. IT'' S IN FACT MORE ALONG THE LINES OF 30. AND ALSO SOMEPLACE IN INFLUENCED LOCATIONS.
OR NEIGHBOURING AREAS EARLY BUNCH ALONG– ERLTON ALONG MACLEOD.
TRAIL, BUT WE PUT THEM ON THERE.
AS AN INFLUENCED PARTY. AS AN EXAMPLE. MOST OF THEM ARE ALONG.
10th method AND ALSO THERE ARE A COUPLE WITHIN RESIDENTIAL.
PROXIMITY TO HOME UNITS THAT.
HAVE RECENTLY GONE UP THAT ARE IN THE APPROVALS REFINE.
NOW.
>> > > SO IF WE WERE TO MAKE THE RULES A BIT EASIER FOR.
SOME AREAS OF THE CITY, YOU.
WOULD SEE US FIRM UP THE REGULATIONS IN MORE PEDESTRIAN.
ORIENTED LARGELY RESIDENTIAL.
DISTRICTS.MIXED USAGE AREA. >

> BLENDED USAGE DISTRICTS
>> WITH. PROXIMITY TO RESIDENTIAL AND DWELLING, YES. > > EVERY LOCAL IN THE CITY
>>. MUST BE TREATED WITH THE EXACT SAME
RESPECT. THANKS FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. TODAY. > > MANY THANKS.
> > Mayor >> Naheed Nenshi:. THANKS, Mr. CRAIG.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND ALSO. > > EXCELLENT MID-DAY. WE CANISTER ' T SPEAK FOR EVERY.
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION WE DO SHOT AND GIVE A NEIGHBORHOOD. PERSPECTIVE AND WE ' VE BEEN.
EXISTING AT THE ASSESSMENTS WHERE
THE CITY HAS BEEN CONFERENCE. WITH THE AREA AS WELL AS OTHER.
STAKEHOLDERS TO REVIEW THIS ISSUE OF INDICATORS. SO FOR OR AGAINST, YOU STAND UP. FOR OR AGAINST.IF I ' D OBTAINED UP FOR, I MIGHT. HAVE BEEN HOME BY NOW WATCHING.
ON TELEVISION. BECAUSE WE REQUIREMENT SOME KIND OF, for. CONTROL ON THIS NEW CLASS OF.
SIGNAGE. OVERALL, THE PROPOSALS
THAT. ADMINISTRATION ' S BROUGHT AHEAD. DO ACHIEVE THIS.
AGAINST, BECAUSE SOME. COMMUNITIES WOULD HONESTLY PREFER. A POSTPONEMENT AT THE VERY LEAST IN SERVICE AND THIRD EVENT.
SIGNS, AT THE VERY LEAST UNTIL A FULL.
INDICATION REVIEW IS COMPLETE. THE FEDERATION SUPPORTED.
MANAGEMENT'' S FIRST STAB AT.
THIS LAST APRIL WHICH WAS TO CALL FOR A DC, DIRECT CONTROL,.
SINCE PERHAPS THAT WAS THE NEXT.
BEST THING. NONETHELESS, MANAGEMENT IS.
PLANNING SERVICE A LONG-TERM.
POLICY INCLUDING BROAD PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND ALSO PUBLIC SURVEY. THAT HASN'' T TOOK PLACE YET EXCEPT.
FOR THE MEETINGS WITH THE DAMAGED COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS. YET IN THE ABSENCE OF POLICIES AND ALSO.
IN THE ABSENCE OF THE CONSENT OF CALGARIANS, A LOT OF THESE NEW.
KINDS OF SIGNS HAVE BEEN.
RELEASED WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS AND ADVANCEMENT.
APPEAL BOARD. WITHOUT CONTROLS, THE INDICATORS WILL PROPOSE UNUSUAL TO UBIQUITOUS.
BEFORE WE UNDERSTAND IT. A HALT, A DIRECT CONTROL WHICH WAS INITIALLY PROPOSED OR.
SOLID DISCRETIONARY REGULATIONS WHICH.
ARE BEING SUGGESTED TODAY MAY APPREHEND THIS PENNING DIGITAL.
SIGN RACE AS WELL AS PERMIT SOME TIME.
FOR CIVIC REPRESENTATION ON THIS NEW ENHANCEMENT TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC REALM.
BEFORE THE DIGITAL EQUINE IS ANY.
FURTHER OUT OF THE DIGITAL BARN, IF YOU'' LL PARDON THAT INCREDIBLY.
CHALLENGING EXAMPLE. WITH EVERYONE COMING UP TO SPEAK AGAINST, MAYBE.
ADMINISTRATION GOT IT RIGHT THIS.
TIME.NOBODY '

S TOTALLY DELIGHTED. I WISH TO REFERENCE A FEW THINGS.
IN REACTION TO SOME THINGS THAT HAVE COME UP. I ASSUME WE WOULD NOT SUPPORT A.
RELAXATION OF THE DISTANCE FROM RESIDENCES. OR A REDUCTION TO A HUNDRED.
METRES. A HUNDRED METRES IS EXTREMELY CLOSE,.
IN MY ESTIMATE. TO HAVE THE CHANNEL-CHANGING AS Mr. CRAIG RECOMMENDED. TO BRING THEM INTO C-RE 1 AND ALSO.
C-CORE 2, 16th Opportunity WAS ELEVATED AS AN EXAMPLE.

> > IF YOU ' RE EVALUATING THE.
> > IN THIS SITUATION IT DOESN ' T DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT ' S ON FLIGHT TERMINAL LANDS.
> > I ' M JUST GOING TO LEAVE SOMETHING HERE. > > SO IF THEY ' RE ILLUMINATED, IT
. > > CURRENTLY, THE BELTLINE
, I ' D BE.WHAT ABOUT 17th method
SOUTHWEST, MARDA LOOPHOLE, 10th STREET NORTHWEST, KENSINGTON
ROADWAY, fourth STREET? THESE ARE PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED ROADWAYS AND ALSO THIS IS AN COMPLETELY
DIFFERENT SCALE OF SIGNAGE. AS WELL AS IF WE'' RE TALKING ABOUT VEHICLE DRIVER DIVERSION, I TELL YOU
AS A VEHICLE DRIVER AS WELL AS AS A HOMEOWNER OF
THE NEARBY AREA YOU MUST PAY ALOT EVEN MORE INTEREST WHEN YOU'' RE. DRIVING ON 17th AVENUE THAN.
YOU GET ON MANY HIGHER QUANTITY, HIGHER SPEED ROADWAYS. SINCE THERE'' S CROSSROADS,.
THERE'' S INDIVIDUALS JAY-WALKING. THERE'' S SIGNS. DURING THE SUMMER, PEOPLE.
PRACTICALLY DRIVE WITH THEIR HEAD OUT THE HOME WINDOW LOOKING AT.
THE LANDSCAPES, AND THE LAST THING.
WE NEED IN THESE MORE PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED AREAS IS TO HAVE.
ANOTHER PERSON KIND OF KINETIC SIGNS.
WHICH HONESTLY WE'' RE JUST BEGINNING TO UNDERSTAND AS WELL AS GET.
MADE USE OF TO. I ASSUME A GREAT POINT WAS MADE EARLIER WITH REGARDS TO.
STRATEGY IT CALGARY. WE'' RE TRYING TO MAKE THESE CORRIDORS IN THE LOCATIONS EVEN MORE.
HUMAN BEING, MORE HABITABLE BECAUSE WE.
WANT EVEN MORE INHABITANTS IN THESE AREAS. AND ALSO I DO THINK THAT HAVING EVEN MORE.
AND ALSO DIFFERENT KINDS OF SIGNAGE INCLUDING THIS NEW DIGITAL.
SIGNAGE CERTAINLY WITHOUT A WHOLE LOT.
OF REPRESENTATION IS GOING IN A DIRECTION THAT'' S OPPOSITE. TO PRODUCTION THESE AREAS EVEN MORE.
HABITABLE.THANK YOU QUITE, IF

YOU HAVE. ANY QUESTIONS.
ALDERMAN LOWE? > > I ' M CURIOUS CONCERNING YOUR COMMENT REGARDING THE LEISURE OF.
I SAID BARLOW PATH WHEN. > > WELL, I PRESUME THERE ' S A COUPLE DETAILS. I ' D WANT TO REFERENCE.
WAS SOME SPEAK ABOUT LESSENING THE.
300 METRES TO 100 METRES. AND DEFINITELY WOULD NOT ASSISTANCE.
THAT. IN STIPULATIONS OF RELAXATION OF THE 300 METRES IN THE LAND USAGE.
DISCRETIONARY PROCEDURE, I THINK.
WHENEVER I HEAR THE WORD “” DISCERNMENT”” I'' M ALWAYS. WORRIED REGARDING WHAT THE ELEMENT.
OF IT COULD BE. SEVERAL OF THE INSTANCES THAT WERE.
SHOWN– I'' M NOT ACCUSTOMED TO.
THE BLACKFOOT EXAMPLE PERSONALLY. BUT ON MACLEOD TRAIL, FOR.
EXAMPLE, THE EXAMPLES THAT WERE SHOWN IN ERLTON, THERE'' S QUITE.
AN ALTITUDE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN.
THOSE INDICATORS AND ALSO THE HOMES IN ERLTON YET THEY FEELING THEY'' RE. LOOKING RIGHT DOWN ON THEM AND.
THOSE INDICATIONS ARE LOOKING RIGHT UP AT THEM. I'' M NOT PARTICULAR IT ' S EASY TO.
MAKE THAT DETERMINATION.I ' D SAY IN THIS INTERIM DURATION,. MUCH BETTER SECURE THAN SORRY.
INDIVIDUALS DON ' T APPARENTLY DON'' T WANT THESE NEAR TO WHERE THEY.
LIVE, AND ALSO WE NEEDS TO APPRECIATE.
> > SO I ' M HAVING SOME. I ' LL USAGE THE ERLTON EXAMPLE WHERE AT NIGHT WHAT WE HEAR IS.
THAT AFTER A HUNDRED METRES.
ESSENTIALLY THE SIGNS DISAPPEAR INTO THE AMBIENT LIGHT ANYHOW.
>> > > I WEAR ' T BELIEVE THAT FOR A. SECOND. GO HAVE A LOOK AT IT
>> AT EVENING.
> > HAVE A LOOK AT IT DURING THE NIGHT. WITH THE GIVEN SIGNS AND ALSO THE HIGH REPRESENTATION OF NOT BEING.
ABLE TO MINIMIZE IT, AS I. UNDERSTAND IT, SO THAT ' S THE– MY PROBLEM AROUND THAT A PERSON. >'> YOU ' RE ACQUIRING THEM ALL NOW.
>> >

> THEY ARE.AND THE RESULTS ARE?
>> > > I WOULD RATHER THAT THIS BE.
AS– I PREFERRED TO THIS BE AS SIMPLE AND BULLET.
PROOF AS POSSIBLE. LIKE I SAID, OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS, WHILE NO POLICIES HAVE BEEN.
IN POSITION, THESE SIGNS HAVE BEEN.
SHOWING UP AND WILL CONTINUE TO APPEAR. I BELIEVE WE REQUIREMENT TO HAVE A FULLER.
DISCUSSION ON SIGNS. A FEW OF THE PROBLEMS INCREASED ABOUT.
THE LIGHTING OF OTHER KINDS OF.
INDICATIONS ARE REALLY INTERESTING. AND I PUT ON'' T THINK WE MUST DO
. ANYTHING TO ADD TO A PROBLEMATIC.
SITUATION. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
ALDERMAN FARRELL?
>> > > DID YOU EVER BEFORE TAKE A SEAT IN A ROOM WITH THE INDUSTRY IN WHICH.
THERE WERE SOME AREAS WHERE THE.
REGULATIONS PERHAPS COULD BE LOOS LOOSED AS WELL AS OTHERS WHERE THEY NEEDED.
> > I WAS AT ONE MEETING THAT HAD AREAS AS WELL AS INDUSTRY INDIVIDUALS. AS WELL AS I DIDN ' T FIND THE EXCHANGE.
PERSPECTIVES ON BOTH SIDES.
THAT WERE HIGHLY SHARED. THIS CANISTER AT LEAST BE MANAGED.
CURRENTLY.
>> > > YES, SINCE WE HAVE SEEN A NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS BE AVAILABLE IN.
ABSENCE OF REGULATIONS AND AFTER THAT–.
>> > > YEAH.
>> EXACTLY. > > AFTER THAT WE HAVE THEM IN PLACE.
>> O.K.. THANK YOU.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:. MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN FARRELL. ANYONE ELSE? THANKS, THANKS FOR BEING RIGHT HERE. ANYONE ELSE WOULD LIK LIKE TO SK IN OPPOSITION TO THIS>> PROPOSAL? MID-DAY, Mr. FECH. > > GOOD AFTERNOON. MAYOR, ALDERMEN, CITY TEAM. MY NAME IS OSCAR FECH. I ' VE LIVED HERE NEAR 60 YEARS IN CALGARY. I FOUND IT VERY INTERESTING, WE.
PRODUCE NEW RULES, BYLAWS ONCE AGAIN TO DEVELOP DIGITAL– WE HAVE.
DIGITAL MODERN TECHNOLOGY ANYWHERE. WE HAVE T.V., WE HAVE WHATEVER– IT'' S AFFECTING OUR.
BRAINS ALREADY. I PUT ON'' T HAVE ALL THIS INNOVATION'. AND ALSO I ' M GLAD I DON ' T. WHEN YOU PAY ATTENTION TO THE PROFESSIONALS, IT AFFECTS YOUR BLOOD SYSTEM,.
YOUR BRAINS OBTAIN …
[Indistinct] IT'' S EXTREMELY FRUSTRATING WHEN.
INDIVIDUALS KNOW WHAT'' S GOING ON AND ALSO. WE OUGHT TO PAY ATTENTION TO THESE COMMENTS AND ANALYZE AND SAY,.
APPEARANCE, CONSIDER ALL THE PAPER THAT.
I'' VE GOT BELOW FOR ONLY ONE BYLAW. IT'' S A LITTLE LAW. ALL THE PAPER THAT WE ' RE UTILIZING, ALWAYS INDICATED AND ALSO STATED WHEN.
WE HAVE GOOD TECHNOLOGY WE'' RE. GOING TO USAGE NO PAPER OR MINIMAL PAPER. WE'' RE USING IN FACT TEN TIMES.
DUE TO THE FACT THAT OF INNOVATION, even more PAPER. AS WELL AS TECHNOLOGY GUIDELINES, CONTROLS.
THE WHOLE SYSTEM. WHAT ENTERS COMES OUT. THIS IS THE WORLD WE'' RE LIVING.
IT'' S LIKE A FICTION GLOBE. LET'' S OBTAIN BACK TO GOOD COMMON.
FINE. THEY PUT SOME DIGITAL ON THEM, THAT WAS EXCELLENT. NOW WE'' RE GOING TOO FAR. THE EYES CAN'' T EVEN TAKE THE GLARING– THE LIGHTS THAT'' S. HAPPENING BACK AS WELL AS FORTH. THERE'' S A LOT OF ACCIDENTS GOING ON AS A RESULT OF ALL THE DIGITAL. I HAD SOMEONE BACK END ME
ABOUT. TWO MONTHS BACK, AND HE TOOK OFF.AND THE GUY BEHIND ME CAME TO. HIM SAID I UNDERSTAND WHERE HE TOOK. OFF TO, SO I CHASED AFTER HIM– NOT CHASED AFTER HIM. MOSTED LIKELY TO THE VEHICLE PARKING WHOLE LOT. HE HAD HIS FOOT IN A CAST– > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:> I AM. APPRECIATING THIS TALE, Mr. FECH. YOU HAVE TO GET BACK TO THE POINT. I DO NEED TO HEAR WHAT OCCURRED. He had his foot in a cast? > > HE HAD A DIGITAL PROBABLY HOW. MANY CAR PARK ATTRACTIONS NEAR CHINOOK. CENTRE.
WHAT I ' M STATING IS I '
M PARTLY. BEING'LUDICROUS BUT IT ' S THE.
REALITY. WE ' RE BEING RAILROADED BACK AND. FORTH. WE DON ' T KNOW WHAT ' S HAPPENING ANY LONGER. OUR BRAINS ARE BEING ALMOST. MUSHED DUE TO ALL THE MODERN TECHNOLOGY. I ' M GLAD I'PUT ON'' T HAVE ALL THIS. MY MIND IS WORKING JUST >> PENALTY. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I. COULD PROBABLY USE A BETTER. MIND AND A LITTLE LESS MUSH. > > Mr. MAYOR, YOUR BRAIN IS.
SIMPLY FINE. YOU'' RE INTO MODERN TECHNOLOGY SO HEAVY, YOU RECOGNIZE DEFINITELY EVERYTHING.
WHAT'' S GOING
>> ON. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I ' M UNCERTAIN THAT EVERYBODY AROUND.
THESE TABLES WOULD AGREE WITH.
YOU, Mr.FECH.

> > OH, THEY DO. YOU'' RE IN THE DIGITAL AND. WHATEVER. BUT MY FINAL REMARKS ARE ALL.
THIS IS JUST A CAMOUFLAGE AND.
IT'' S– IT WILL CERTAINLY HAVE A BIG IMPACT. THIS IS NOT LAS LAS VEGA. NOT TIMES SQUARE. I'' VE BEEN ALL THESE PLACES. WHAT I'' M CLAIMING IS LET ' S OBTAIN. CLEAR OF ALL THIS FLASHING AND CONTROLING. WE NEED TO DO AWAY WITH ALL THIS. LET'' S GO BACK TO SOUND JUDGMENT, WHAT WE HAD. I UNDERSTAND I MAINTAIN REPEATING THESE. THINGS CURRENTLY AS WELL AS AFTER THAT. AND ALSO LOTS OF PEOPLE DON '
T WANT TO. LISTEN TO THAT. BUT SOMEBODY NEEDS TO REPEAT IT. ALLOW'' S RETURN WHAT WE HAD
IN. THE PAST.'THAT ' S WHAT MAKES THE GLOBE GO ROUND. NOT SPIN EVERYTHING. WE'' RE BEING SPUN OUT OF CONTROL. THAT'' S THE WHOLE ISSUE. THAT'' S WHY WE ' RE HAVING– I. CALL ITSELF IMPLOSION. LIKE THE ROMAN EMPIRE DAYS AND ALSO.
SODOM AND GOMORRAH. ALLOW'' S OBTAIN BACK TO GOOD COMMON FEELING AS WELL AS THAT WILL WORK. WE WILL CERTAINLY ENDURE A WHOLE LOT LONGER IF.
WE RETURN TO THAT ERA.THANK YOU QUITE. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:
>> WORDS. TO LIVE BY.
ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE THAT WANT TO SPEAK IN RESISTANCE TO THIS.
PROPOSITION? ANYONE ELSE WHO WANT TO SPEAK IN RESISTANCE? ALL RIGHT THEN. WE WILL CERTAINLY SHUT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS AND TAKE QUESTIONS FOR.
WE'' LL TAKE SOME DISPUTE. ALDERMAN MAR MAY HAVE–.
ALDERMAN CARRA. ALDERMAN CARRA.
>> > > SO I GUESS MY FIRST INQUIRY. TO MANAGEMENT IS HAVE WE DIFFERENTIATED BETWEEN THE.
DIFFERENT TYPES OF– I'' LL DELAY. HAVE WE DIFFERENTIATED BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT SORTS OF DIGITAL.
SIGNS?
>> > > YOUR PRAISE, THE SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS TODAY JUST RECOGNIZE.
THE DIGITAL MESSAGING INDICATORS.
AS A PARTICULAR KIND AND THE DIGITAL THIRD EVENT ADVERTISING.
INDICATIONS AS A SPECIFIC KIND. IT DOESN'' T DISTINGUISH IN BETWEEN THE SIZES OF THE SIGNS.> > > SO'IT ' S ACTIVITY VIDEO OR SIMPLY. FIXED PRESENTATION IS WHAT THE DIFFERENTIATION IS.
> > THE DISTINCTION IS MORE.

OR LESS THE CONTENT.WITH ELECTRONIC MESSAGE INDICATIONS.
THE WEB CONTENT IS RELATED TO THE.
BUSINESS ON THE WEBSITE WHEREAS 3RD CELEBRATION MARKETING IS.
RELATED TO A 3RD PARTY OR A.
THIRD ITEM. >> > > SO THERE ' S NO DIFFERENCE.
BETWEEN THE VIDEO CLIP INDICATIONS AS WELL AS SORT.
OF A STATIC SCREEN INDICATION. >> > > YOUR WORSHIP, THE AMENDMENTS.
DO NOT ALLOW ANY FULL MOVEMENT.
VIDEO CLIP IN EITHER KIND OF INDICATION, ONLY STATIC IMAGES.
>> > > AS WELL AS WHERE DOES THE VIDEO.
ACTION THAT'' S TAKING PLACE ON THE SIGN BY McMAHON STADIUM, WHERE. > > AT THIS POINT IN TIME … YES, YOUR PRAYER,
THE McMAHON.
CALGARY LAND THEREFORE IT IS EXEMPT FROM OUR LAND USAGE LAW SUPPLIED.
THAT THE SIGN MANAGES.
> > O.K.. MY OTHER INQUIRY IS, THERE IS An INDICATOR AND IT'' S ON MACLEOD TRAIL.
AS WELL AS IT'' S HIGH UP ON A PYLON AS WELL AS
. > > YES, YOUR PRAYER. IT ' S OPERATING IN CONFORMITY.
> > THAT INDICATION DRIVES >> PEOPLE. CRAZY.
I'' M HAVING A TOUGH TIME SETTING APART IN BETWEEN THE.
SAFETY FACTORS TO CONSIDER THAT WE'' RE. DISCUSSING TODAY AND ALSO THE ESTHETIC DISCUSSION, THE.
ESTHETICS CONVERSATION THAT WE'' RE. HAVING. AND ALSO I ' M NOT CERTAIN THAT WE ' VE–
I. THINK WE ' VE BLENDED THEM, AND I.
DON'' T KNOW HOW TO EXPRESSION THIS CONCERN EXACTLY, BUT CONTAINER YOU.
OFFER ME SOME INSIGHT AS TO HOW.
YOU GUYS SOUGHT TO DIFFERENTIATE AND/OR BLEND THAT WITHIN THESE.
SUGGESTED SHORT-LIVED LIPSZ … [Indistinct]> > > SHOT TO BE BRIEF. THERE WERE BOTH ESTHETIC AND.
SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS IN THIS CHANGE. THE SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO.
EMPHASIZE IS THAT THESE ARE ACTING MODIFICATIONS TO, AS.
Mr.VAN WEGAN MENTIONED, TO.
TAKE CARE OF THE SITUATION TILL WE CAN HAVE FULL ENGAGEMENT AND A.
PERMANENT SET OF RULES. COMPONENT OF THE LONGER TERM STRATEGY WILL CERTAINLY BE FOR US TO TAKE A LOOK AT SOME.
UPCOMING SECURITY RESEARCH STUDIES, AMONG.
THEM IS BEING DONE BY THE FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION.
DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES.
TO LOOK AT THE SAFETY AND SECURITY FACETS WHICH RECORD SCHEDULES LATER.
THIS YEAR, HAS ACTUALLY BEEN DELAYED FOR.
A LONG TIME WHERE WE CANISTER OBTAIN A MUCH BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE.
SECURITY EFFECTS. THE SECOND ISSUE WE'' RE HANDLING WITH WAS THE ESTHETIC AND ALSO.
COMPATIBILITY CONCERN AND AS HAS.
BEEN DISCUSSED and also discovered TODAY, WE DID NOT CHECKLIST DIGITAL.
3RD PARTY MARKETING SIGNS IN.
THE PASSAGES, THE 17th Method SOUTHEAST SOUTHWEST,.
16th AVENUE, KENSINGTON ROAD.
ET CETERA.THE REASON FOR THAT IS WE FELT. THOSE AREAS ARE THE BLENDED USAGE
. LOCATIONS WHERE COUNCIL ' S POLICIES ARE LOOKING FOR TO ADVERTISE MORE. HOME DEVICES AS WELL AS EVEN MORE MIXED. UTILIZES. WE DESIRED RATHER THAN A. DEFAULT CHOICE FOR A CHOICE.
TO BE BASED ON PLAN AND ALSO CONSIDERATIONS THAT WOULD BE THE. POLICIES COMING OUT OF SOME POLICY.
THAT WOULD OCCUR LATER.
PART OF THAT POLICY DEVELOPMENT. MAY BE TO IDENTIFY SMALLER.
SIZED SIGNS THAT ARE PEDESTRIAN
ORIENTED THAT MAY BE. APPROPRIATE IN THOSE AREAS.
> > MY LAST CONCERN INVOLVES
>> THIS, I ' M TRYING TO WRAP MY. MIND AROUND THE PROBLEM.
DEMANDS FOR THESE INDICATORS. WHAT IS THE PHILOSOPHY OF SECURITY. DRIVING THAT? I HAVE– I INDICATE, WE PUT UP A BUNCH OF GRAPHES AND ALSO SPOKE ABOUT.
AS ROAD SPED UP RISES PEOPLE'' S. RESPONSE TIME LOWERS AND ALSO ALL OF THAT. EXPLAIN THAT TO ME, BECAUSE, I.
MEAN, I THINK– WE UNDERSTAND THAT ROADS HAVE A STYLE RATE AS WELL AS.
ROADWAYS HAVE ACTUALLY An UPLOADED SAFETY.
LIMIT.A SPEED RESTRICTION

, RIGHT? AND ALSO THE TRADITIONAL OF ROADWAY.
CRAFTING WAS THAT WE NEED TO ELIMINATE ITEMS THAT PEOPLE SMASH.
INTO TO BOOST SAFETY AND SECURITY. OF COURSE, THE FURTHER BACK YOU PLACE THINGS FROM THE ROAD.
NOW WE UNDERSTAND THE FASTER PEOPLE.
DRIVE. THEREFORE YOU MIGHT HAVE An UPLOADED.
SPEED LIMIT, BUT THE MADE.
SPEED UP COULD BE A WHOLE LOT GREATER THAN THAT. WE DO KNOW THAT SPED UP KILLS. THEREFORE AS WE TRY AND SHIFT FROM AN AUTOMOBILE-FOCUSED.
TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENT TO AN.
SETTING THAT PUTS A GREAT DEAL MORE EMPHASIS ON OTHER MODES AND.
SEEKS TO BLEND THESE SETTINGS.
INTERACTING, EXPLAIN TO ME THE TROUBLE WITHIN THE CONTEXT.
OF THE BRAND-NEW CTP AS OPPOSED.
CONVENTIONAL CONVENTIONAL WAY OF DESIGNING FOR ROAD SAFETY.
>> > > YOUR PRAYER, MAYOR NENSHI,
.'I ' M WITH TRANSPORTATION PREPARATION. I PRESUME'YOU ' RE TALKING REGARDING 2. PRINCIPLES BELOW WITH THE PROBLEMS FROM THE BUILDING LINE WE'' RE. ATTEMPTING TO ACHIEVE– WE'' RE. ATTEMPTING TO HANDLE COMPETITION FOR DRIVER FOCUS. WE BELIEVE THAT WEB TRAFFIC CONTROL.
GADGETS ARE PRIMARY, AND AFTERWARDS MAYBE ONE PROPOSALS AUTHORIZE WOULD.
BE SECONDARY AND ALSO 3RD PARTY.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING INDICATION WOULD BE OUR LAST ISSUE IF DRIVERS ARE.
SEEING IT OR NOT. THE VARIOUS OTHER PRINCIPLE IS THE CLEAR AREA THAT YOU POINTED OUT. IT'' S MINIMUM IS 6 METRES. IT IS USED TO HOLD UP THE ITEMS FROM THE WITH LANES.
THAT THERE WOULD BE– NO ONE.
WOULD HIT THESE OBJECTS.SO THAT ' S WHAT YOU WERE SPEAKING.
WHEN YOU WERE TALKING, PROBABLY.
REGARDING PUSHING ITEMS FAR FROM THE THROUGHFARE.
>> > > YEAH. AND I'' M SIMPLY– YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY THE FURTHER YOU ESTABLISH.
THINGS BACK THE MORE OPEN THE.
> > YEAH. > > OKAY. I BELIEVE WHAT SECTOR IS SORT OF.
WHEN, putting FORWARD TO US HERE IS THAT THE DIGITAL SIGN.
PROPERLY RELEASED IS NO.
AND ALSO IS BETTER BECAUSE IT'' S LESS. THAT'' S A GREAT STORY. UNLESS IT'' S WAY EVEN MORE VISUALLY IMPACTFUL.
PUBLIC, AND THAT'' S WHY AT THIS. TIME PENDING LONGER TERM STUDIES AS WELL AS LONGER TERM.
FUNCTION WE'' RE PROPOSING TO MANAGE.
THAT CAN PERHAPS OFFER COUNCIL SOME MORE CONCLUSIVE. I ' M NOT CERTAIN IF THAT ' S VALUABLE OR NOT. YOU, ALDERMAN CARRA.
ALDERMAN MAR, YOU ' RE NEXT BUT I SEE YOU ' RE SCRU SCRIBBLING.'ARE YOU PREPARED? > > YEAH. YOUR PRAYER, THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME I ' D LIKE TO STEP A.
RECOMMENDATION OF CPC 2011-27– I OUGHT TO PROVIDE THIS TO THE CLERK.
CURRENTLY. AS WELL AS CREATE An UNIQUE COUNCIL TASKFORCE TO BE COMPRISED OF.
THREE MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.
INCLUDING THE CHAIR OF LPT AND ALSO 2 OTHERS TO BE APPOINTED BY.
COUNCIL TODAY PROBABLY DURING THE.
IN CAMERA SESSION TO RECORD BACK TO THE STANDING PLAN BOARD.
ON LPT NO LATER THAN JUNE 2011. I BELIEVE THAT THIS IS A CHALLENGING CONCERN. THERE'' S A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT. DON ' T HAVE THE TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE WHEN'WE ' RE TALKING. ABOUT CANDLES AND ALSO LUMINS AS WELL AS.
NICKS OR KNOCKS OR WHATEVER THE HELL THEY ARE. IT'' S DEBATABLE INSOFAR AS WE.
ARE ARE DISCUSSING THE TRANSFORMATIVE ADJUSTMENT OF AN.
MARKET THAT IS INVOLVING.
COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDERS AND ADMINISTRATION AND ALSO I WOULD LOVE.
TO SEE A SMALLER TASKFORCE THAT.
WAS ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE ISSUE FAR MORE CLEARLY THAN WE DO NOW.
AND REPORT BACK AS A COMMITTEE.
TO LPT AND ALSO THROUGH COUNCIL.SO THAT WOULD BE MY REFERENCE. MOTION AT THIS TIME.
ON THE REFERRAL MOTION, I ' LL RUN. IF IT ' S ON THE REFERENCE ACTIVITY. I BELIEVE WHAT WE ' RE TRYING TO EFFORT TO DO TODAY IS BRING.
WHERE THERE IS NONE.
A MORATORIUM ON THESE APPLICATIONS WHILE WE DELAY. I WOULD HOPE IT
WOULD WANT TO SEE SORT KIND URBAN PERSPECTIVEPOINT OF VIEW
AND ALSO A SUV VIEWPOINT.
CONSISTED OF IN THIS? AND ALSO ADDITIONALLY WHETHER OR NOT YOU.
WOULD BE INCLUDING THE.
STAKEHOLDERS SO THERE WOULD BE MORE PURPOSEFUL STAKEHOLDER.
INVOLVEMENT. AS WELL AS MAY I ASK A CONCERN OF MANAGEMENT DURING THIS.
DEBATE? WHEN DO YOU EXPECT– OH. WENT AWAY ON ME. THERE YOU GO. WHEN DO YOU PREPARE FOR THE REPORT THAT'' S ORIGINATING FROM THE. U.S.THAT CHATS ABOUT THE INFLUENCE.
ON TRANSPORT SECURITY AND ALSO DIGITAL SIGNAGE?
>> > > YOUR WORSHIP, THAT REPORT.
WAS SUPPOSED TO BE IN JANUARY. IT'' S CURRENTLY MY UNDERSTANDING IS MAY.
OF THIS YEAR. OF TRAINING COURSE THE TIME LINE ON.
THAT IS OUT OF– NOT IN OUR.
CONTROL. >> > > NO. IF IT DOES COME IN MAY, DO.
YOU BELIEVE THIS COULD ASSISTANCES NOTIFY THAT COMMITTEE? OR IS IT FAR TOO LATE? IT'' S PART OF THE >>– > > I ' M UNSURE WHAT THE TIMING.
OF MEETINGS WOULD BE. CERTAINLY THE SECURITY RESEARCH STUDY APPEARING OF THE U.S. WAS.
SOMETHING WE WERE DEFINITELY.
GOING TO INCLUDE AS PART OF OUR LONGER TERM DISCUSSIONS ON THE.
IRREVERSIBLE REGULATIONS THAT WOULD BE.
RECOMMENDED TO COUNCIL.

>> > > ONE OF THE CONCERNS I WAS.
GOING TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE.
SUGGESTIONS BEFORE United States IS EXISTS A BETTER WAY TO.
SET APART THE EVEN MORE.
PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED URBAN CORRIDORS AS OPPOSED TO A MORE.
SUBURBAN CONTEXT IN WHICH I BELIEVE.
IT REQUIRES TO BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY?
>> > > YOUR WORSHIP, THE
. RECOMMENDATIONS PRIOR TO COUNCIL TODAY ARE BASICALLY SUGGESTING.
THAT BECAUSE THE AREAS THAT.
WERE NOT RECOMMENDING THE DIGITAL SIGNS BE NOTED, THE.
C-CORE 1, THE C-CORE 2.
AS THE INDUSTRIAL SIDE AREA WHICH IS PROMPTLY SURROUNDING TO.
RESIDENTIAL. ESSENTIALLY THAT'' S THE RECOMMENDATION TODAY TOO.
>> > > I DO SEE A BIG DISTINCTION.
IN BETWEEN KENSINGTON AND MACLEOD ROUTE OR BLACKFOOT. SO I WEAR'' T KNOW IF THAT SUBTLETY.
IS COVERED IN THIS– IN YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS.
>> > > WHAT'I ' LL DO IS I ' LL ASK–. WE HAVE A MAP, C-CORE 1 AND ALSO C-CORE 2, WE COULD SHOW THAT FOR. COUNCIL IF THEY ' D LIKE TO SEE

. THAT.SO IS THAT THE RED … SO THE RED COLOUR, YOUR PRAISE,.
WOULD BE THE C-CORE 1 AND THE C-CORE 2 DISTRICTS. THE YELLOW IS SIMPLY TO EMPHASIZE.
THE LOCATIONS, SIMPLY TO IDENTIFY WHERE THE RED IS, BUT IT DOESN'' T. ENCOMPASS THE YELLOW LOCATIONS, JUST.
THE RED DOTS YOU SEE ON THE MAP. >> > > THE WORRY ABOUT MACLEOD.
ROUTE, WHERE DOES THAT ENTER.
PLAY? >> > > I THINK THAT SEVERAL OF THE.
WORRIES HAVE BEEN EXPRESSED.
WITH REGARD TO THE PROPOSED 300 METRE PROBLEM FROM HOUSE.
UNITS. AND I ALSO RECOGNIZE THAT THERE HAS BEEN SOME CONVERSATION ABOUT.
IF, making THAT RELAXABLE SO THAT.
AN APPLICATION WAS RECEIVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, IT.
COULD BE DISTRIBUTED TO RESIDENT.
NEIGHBORHOODS AND DISCRETION COULD BE EXERCISED TO SAY DECREASE THE.
SETBACK RANGE IF THERE WAS A.
PHYSICAL OBSTACLE LIKE YOU'' RE IN A VALLEY OR BEHIND A BUILDING,.
REDUCING IT TO A LOWER NUMBER. THAT IS AN CHOICE AS WELL FOR CONSIDERATION.
>> > > OKAY. THANK YOU.WELL, COUNCIL

, I WILL CERTAINLY SUSTAIN.
THIS REFERENCE. WITH– HESITANTLY. WE TABLED THIS AT PREPARATION.
COMMISSION SEVERAL TIMES AND ALSO I.
THINK THE PROBLEM I HAVE IS THAT WHILE WE DELAY CHOOSING.
ON THIS, WE SEE APPLICATIONS,.
AS WELL AS WITHOUT PLAN CONTEXT. BUT I'' M HOPING THAT IF THE. SECTOR HAS A LITTLE MORE.
TIME TO FUNCTION WITH CITY MANAGEMENT, MEMBERS OF.
COUNCIL AND ALSO WITH THE COMMUNITY,.
THAT THEY WILL DO THAT IN GOOD FAITH AND NOT SHOT AND ALSO SQUEEZE IN.
A NUMBER OF THESE DIGITAL.
APPLICATIONS IN THE MEANTIME. IF THAT OCCURS, AFTER THAT YOU'' VE. LOST MY SUPPORT IN THE FUTURE. I WILL SUPPORT IT WITH UNWILLINGNESS, BUT I DO HOPE THAT.
WE APPEARANCE AT THE URBAN CONTEXT.
VARIOUS FROM A MORE AUTOMOBILE ORIENTED CONTEXT.
>> > > Mar Naheed Nenshi:.
ALDERMAN FARRELL, I WILL, IF YOU INTENDED TO, UP TO YOU, ACCEPT A.
ACTIVITY ARISING NEED TO THIS PASS.
I BELIEVE I CANISTER DO THAT. I ASSUME WE CANISTER DO THAT, I MEAN.FROM NOW UNTIL IN BOARD.
> > I ASSUME THAT–>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi>: NEVER. MIND OPINION MISS SLOAN
CLAIMS WE. CONTAINER ' T DO THAT.
> > AS A MOTION OCCURRING OR–. EITHER.
POWER. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: IT WAS.
WORTH A GREAT SHOT. HAVE I POINTED OUT MANY, MANY,.
LOTS TIMES THAT THE MGA DOESN'' T. GIVE United States THE POWERS THAT WE NEED? ON THE REFERRAL MOTION, ALDERMAN.
> > YES, THANK YOU, YOUR WORSHIP.THIS IS EXTREMELY MUCH REMINISCENT OF. WHAT IT ' S LIKE AT HOME BEING.
YOU'' RE THAT GREAT, ALDERMAN.
> > THAT'' S INTERESTING. I RECOGNIZE THERE'' S BEEN A LOT OF.
I'' M ALSO CONCERNED REGARDING THE LACK OF HAVING SOME.
GUIDELINES IN LOCATION.

AS WELL AS I ' M GLAD I WEAR ' T. WE DON ' T KNOW WHAT ' S GOING ON ANY LONGER. WHAT I'' M CLAIMING IS LET ' S OBTAIN. THAT'' S WHY WE ' RE HAVING– I. TELEPHONE CALL ITSELF IMPLOSION. I ' M NOT SURE IF THAT ' S HANDY OR NOT.AS WELL AS I TIN'' T RECALL EXACTLY WHAT THE MOMENT LINE WAS THAT HE HAD
PUT ON THERE.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: JUNE. >> > > JUNE. JUNE.'THERE ' S A SIGNIFICANT QUANTITY OF TIME BETWEEN NOW AS WELL AS AFTER THAT. AND ALSO I THINK WE COULD A MINIMUM OF
RESEMBLE ULTIMATELY WHAT WOULD BE A GOOD ACTING OPTION
AND ALSO GIVE SOME REGULATIONS AND
REGULATIONS AROUND THIS. I'' M UNSURE HOW I ' M GOING TO VETERINARIAN ON THIS THING– BALLOT ON THIS POINT

AT THIS POINT.ESPECIALLY IN LIGHT TO THE REALITY IT INCLUDES MORE WORK TO MY OWN WORK. BUT … ASSUMING THAT IT'' S GOING TO PASS. [
Inaudible] I ' M CHAIR. NOT MAKING AN PRESUMPTION THERE.
I MAY VERY BRIEFLY. INQUIRY, I WAS TRYING TO READ THROUGH SOME OF THE THINGS THAT I.
HAD, BUT IF WE WERE TO AMEND THE.
LAND USAGE DISTRICTS WOULD THAT NEED READVERTISING?
>> > > AMEND THE LISTING OF DISTRICTS.
IN THE LAND USAGE BYLAW? IN THE PROPOSED BYLAW? I THINK MISS SLOAN IS NODDING.
HER HEAD YES, IT WOULD REQUIRE READVERTISING.
>> > > SO WE COULDN ' T IN FACT MAKE.
AN MODIFICATION BECAUSE WE CANISTER ONLY MAKE AN MODIFICATION AT SECOND.
ANALYSIS. SO IF WE WERE TO PROPOSE EVEN AN AMENDMENT IT WOULD THEN.
DEMAND THE NEED TO
. READVERTISE AND HAVE A BRAND-NEW PUBLIC HEARING?
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: YES. SO I'' LL LET MISS SLOAN RESPONSE THAT BUT I WILL STATE IN ADVANCE.
THAT, YES, THAT'' S PROBABLY.
RIGHT.BUT ACTUALLY

EVEN A FEW OF THE.
AMENDMENTS THAT WERE BEING.
SUGGESTED BY INDUSTRY TODAY, ESPECIALLY THE ONE ABOUT.
ALTERING THE DISTRICTS TO WHICH.
IT'' S PROVIDED WOULD ACTUALLY CALL FOR A READVERTISING AS WELL AS AFTER THAT.
ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING. BECAUSE THIS WAS NOT ORIGINALLY PROMOTED. MISS SLOAN, IS THAT FAIR?
>> > > THAT ' S CORRECT >>. > > AND ALSO I ' M JUST TRYING TO BE. CLEAR CONCERNING THAT. HOW THIS PROCEDURE ACTUALLY PROGRESSES. IF WE– WE CONTAINER ' T OFFICIALLY.
AMEND THE BYLAW UNTIL SECONDLY READING. SO ESSENTIALLY THERE WOULD BE NO.
AMENDMENTS ON THE FLOOR UP UNTIL SECOND READING IN WHICH SITUATION THE.
PUBLIC HEARING WOULD AFTER THAT BE.
CLOSED. WHEN IT RETURNED, IF WE DID.
AUTHORIZE CHANGES TO IT AT.
2ND ANALYSIS, IT WOULD NECESSITATE A READVERTISEMENT,.
WOULDN'' T REOPEN THE GENERAL PUBLIC.
PROCESS? I'' M JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND. THE PROCESS RIGHT HERE.
>> > > YOUR PRAYER, IT REALLY DEPENDS WHAT THE AMENDMENTS ARE.
AS TO WHETHER OR NOT A NEW.
PUBLIC HEARING AND ALSO READVERTISEMENT WOULD BE.
REQUIRED. ADDING An USAGE TO A DISTRICT THAT WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY MARKETED.
WOULD DEFINITELY REQUIRE A NEW.
PUBLIC HEARING AND A BRAND-NEW AD.IF YOU WERE SIMPLY MODIFYING RULES,.
INSTEAD OF A 300.
METRE PROBLEM IT'' S GOING TO BE A 250 METRE PROBLEM, THAT'' S. SOMETHING THAT COUNCIL COULD DO.
WITHOUT A READVERTISEMENT OR PUBLIC HEARING.
>> > > O.K.>>. > > ONE CAVEAT THAT'I ' D PUT ON THAT– NOT CAUTION BUT ONE.
ADDED FACTOR I'' D MAKE IS THE. REGARD TO THIS BYLAW.
IT'' S HIGHLY MOST LIKELY THAT IN NEW.
BECAUSE, public HEARING IS GOING TO BE REQUIRED IN ANY EVENT.
NEW INFORMATION HAS BEEN.
COLLECTED BEYOND THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURE. THAT WOULD NECESSITATE A.
PUBLIC HEARING AS WELL AS A READVERTISEMENT.
>> > > YEAH. IT'' S UNFORTUNATE ACTUALLY THAT THIS REFERENCE MOTION WAS MADE.
BEFORE WE COULD ACTUALLY.
CARRY OUT SOME ADJUSTMENTS, AT THE VERY LEAST TO INITIATE SOME CHANGES AS WELL AS.
PERHAPS HAVE AN AD HOC.
COMMITTEE BE DIRECTED TO ESTABLISH NEW OR EXTRA STANDARDS,.
PARTICULARLY IN RELATIONS TO.
THIRD EVENT ADVERTISEMENT.AND I THINK THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN. A BETTER MEANS ONWARD.
BUT I ' LL LISTEN TO THE ADDED ARGUMENTS AND ALSO THE. MOVING COMPANY IN HIS NEAR SEE.
WHETHER OR NOT I TIN ASSISTANCE THIS. STILL NOT THERE. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:
>> MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN CHABOT. ALDERMAN STEVENSON? OUT THE RECOMMENDATION? ALDERMAN LOWE ON THE REFERRAL?
>> > > YOUR PRAISE,'I ' D
LIKE TO. SAY THANKS TO MISS SLOAN FOR THE DESCRIPTION AROUND THE EFFECT OF.
THE RECOMMENDATION BECAUSE I WAS A BIT.
CURIOUS ABOUT THAT. AS WELL AS, YOU RECOGNIZE, TO BE FRANK, YOUR.
PRAYER, I'' M NOT QUITE SURE WHY.
COUNCIL WISHES TO HANDLE ADMINISTRATION'' S FUNCTION. CANDIDLY. OUR JOB IS TO REGULATE, NOT TO MANAGE. HAVING ACTUALLY SAID THAT, OBVIOUSLY I.
CONTAINER'' T SUPPORT THE REFERRAL FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS. I ALSO VALUE THE FACT MISS
. SLOAN ADVISED YOU WE CAN NOT PUT A MORATORIUM IN POSITION. WE HAVE A BYLAW AND ALSO CANDIDATES.
ARE ENTITLED TO MAKE APPLICATION UNDER THAT LAW AS WELL AS WE'' RE. REQUIRED TO PROCEDURE THOSE.
APPLICATIONS UNDER THAT BYLAW. THOSE ARE SORT OF THE PROMINENT.
FACTS AROUND IT. SO WITH RESPECT TO THE REFERENCE, OBVIOUSLY, YOUR WORSHIP, I WILL.
AND ALSO I'' LL LEAVE MY LIGHT ON FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I'' M GOING TO TURN YOUR LIGHT OFF.
ALDERMAN LOWE NOT BECAUSE I.
DON'' T WANT TO YOU DISCUSS FURTHER, I INTENDED TO EXHAUST THE.
LIST. I'' LL TURN IT RIGHT BACK ON AGAIN. ALDERMAN KEATING ON THE.
REFERENCE? >> > > THANKS, YOUR PRAISE. I DO REQUIREMENT A COUPLE QUESTIONS OF.
INFORMATION OF MANAGEMENT ALSO. I THOUGHT I HEARD TODAY THAT.
WE'' RE IN THE PROCESS OF EXAMINING INDICATORS– KIND OF THE.
INDICATOR BYLAW THROUGHOUT THE

CITY IN. GENERAL.IS THAT CORRECT? >> > YES, YOUR PRAISE.
>> > > AS WELL AS I BELIEVED THE TIME LINE WAS SOMETHING LIKE 18 MONTHS.
>>> >, THAT. >> THAT IS CORRECT.
> > SO IN THIS MEANTIME OF 18.
MONTHS, COULD ANYBODY LOOK FOR A. REGULAR SIGNBOARD, LIT OR NOT LIT, WHICH MAY MOVE FORWARD. SEPARATE FROM IT BEING DIGITAL? > > YES, THAT'' S CORRECT. THE PROPOSED APPEALS TODAY DO.
NOT IN ANY– MODIFICATIONS TODAY.
DO NEVER AFFECT THE EXISTING CONVENTIONAL.
SIGNBOARDS.
>> > > SO POSTPONEMENT IS ONLY ON THE DIGITAL ELEMENT NOT ON SIGNS IN.
GENERAL, AS WELL AS AS A RESULT WITHIN 18.
MONTHS WE'' LL RETURN WITH A POSSIBLY ENTIRE DIFFERENT SET OF.
RULES.
>> > > THAT IS THE INTENT, YOUR PRAISE.
>> > > SO ON THAT RESPECT, THE
. REFERRAL I TYPE OF HAD WISHED IT DONNED THE TASKFORCE– DROPPED.
THE TASKFORCE AS WELL BECAUSE WE.
SHOULD HAVE REFERRED IT BACK TO THE 18 MONTHS AS WELL AS GONE FORWARD.
FROM THERE. ON THAT PARTICULAR POINT I WILL SUSTAIN IT, THANKS.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
THANKS, ALDERMAN KEATING.ON THE RECOMMENDATION,

ALDERMAN. MacLEOD? > > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER>. MY QUESTIONS RELATE TO I PRESUME. PARTLY WHY WE WOULD HAVE.
COUNCIL MEMBERS ON THIS.
AND ALSO I ' M HOPING ALDERMAN MAR'CONTAINER. CLEAR UP THAT A BIT.
FURTHER. IN HIS CLOSE.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:. IF I MAY SPEAK FOR ALDERMAN MAR, I ' M CERTAIN HE
' LL MENTION REFERENCE IN HIS. > > ALDERMAN MacLEOD
TOUCHED ON.
POINT OF IN WHICH WE ' RE AT AT THE. POLICY PROCEDURE.
I WEAR ' T HAVE MY ORANGE BOOK. ALDERMAN POOTMANS, THANK YOU SO MUCH. > > I UNDERSTAND YOU APPRECIATE THESE.
> > NOT REALLY
>>? >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: AS.
LENGTHY AS THERE'' S LABELS ON WHICH. THE REFERRAL IS PUT AND ALSO AFTER THIS LONG PUBLIC HEARING, AND.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I THINK IT ' S CLEAR. > > SO WE ' RE REFERRING A REPORT TO A TASKFORCE INCLUDING THE. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THEY ' RE CONSIDERING– PERHAPS.
> > MAYBE IN YOUR CLOSE', ALDERMAN MAR, I ' D APPRECIATE. WHAT THE OBJECTIVE IS.
I ' M LOOKING AHEAD TO SUPPORTING THIS MOTION BUT ALONG. WITH OTHERS SERIOUSLY. THINKING ABOUT WHETHER WE NEEDS TO BE ENGAGED IN THIS AS COUNCIL.
>> MEMBERS. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANKS, ALDERMAN POOTMANS. ANY PERSON ELSE ON THE REFERENCE.
MOVEMENT? ALDERMAN JONES?
>> > > YOUR PRAISE, I WOULD JUST. LIKE EXPLANATION OF BOTH OTHERS– IS IT TWO OTHERS FROM.
MANAGEMENT OR MORE OTHERS.
FROM STAKEHOLDERS? YOU'' VE GOT 3 MEMBERS OF
. COUNCIL. PLUS THE CHAIR OF LAND USE PREPARATION AND ALSO TRANSPORTATION AS WELL AS.
TWO OTHERS TO BE APPOINTED BY.
COUNCIL TODAY.

>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: WHAT.
=$.
=$ COUNCIL AMONG WHOM IS THE.
CHAIR.
OF LPT AND 2 OTHER MEMBERS OF.
COUNCIL.
>> > > HE SAID IT TWICE AFTER THAT. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: HIS.
> > OK. Inaudible]
> > SORRY, BUT ARE WE SUGGESTING. THAT THREE COUNCILLORS ARE GOING TO MAKE THESE DECISIONS IN
. COMBINATION WITH NOBODY ELSE,.
SIMPLY THESE THREE? DUE TO THE FACT THAT THAT'' S WHAT THIS. RECOMMENDATION SAYS.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: IT. ACTUALLY KIND OF DOES. > > IT DOES.
COME BACK TO LPT WITH THE REPORT. FROM 3 ALDERMEN.
[Faint'] WELL, I SIMPLY … IF YOU ' RE GOING TO RESPOND IN YOUR CLOSE, THAT ' S BAD. >> SUFFICIENT BECAUSE I WISH TO KNOW.
WHO ELSE– > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi
>>: CANCANISTER YOU RESPOND CURRENTLY, ALDERMAN MAR. > > OKAY.
A SMALL AD HOC GROUP? BECAUSE I BELIEVE THAT THERE ' S. SOME SERIOUSLY ENTRENCHED. PLACEMENTS BOTH ADMINISTRATIVELY ALONG WITH THE INDUSTRY.
I THINK THAT A SMALL GROUP OF. MEMBERS OF COUNCIL LIKE WE HAVE PERFORMED WITH SNOW AND ICE AS WELL AS OTHER. COMMITTEES, THE GENERAL PUBLIC SECURITY.
TASKFORCE, WILL CERTAINLY PERMIT US TO BE ABLE TO DRILL TO THE REAL.
BASICS OF THE PROBLEM, TO.
FIGURE OUT, HEY, WHAT CANISTER BENEFIT United States AS A CITY, HOW DO WE WORK.
ALONG WITH ADMINISTRATION AS WELL AS.
THE BRING as well as stakeholders TOGETHER A BRAND-NEW PLAN THAT WILL.
MAKE GOOD SENSE FOR EVERYBODY. SO JUNE, I'' M SAYING THAT AS THE MOST RECENT DAY IF WE CONTAINER BRING IT.
BACK SOONER, THAT MAKES FEELING. THE CHAIR OF LPT SHOULD BE ON IT BECAUSE IT'' S OBVIOUSLY GOING TO.
LPT. TWO MEMBERS OF COUNCIL TO BE DETERMINED IN IN VIDEO CAMERA TODAY. WE CAN MAKE A VERY FAST.
CHOICE REGARDING WHO OUGHT TO BE ON THIS. AND ALSO WE'' RE GOING TO CONSIST OF.
THE– THIS TEAM WOULD HAVE THE CAPABILITY TO DRAW FROM THE.
RESOURCES OF ADMINISTRATION TO.
ASK THE STAKEHOLDERS BOTH PUBLIC AND ALSO SECTOR AHEAD WITH EACH OTHER.
AND WORK IN THE DIRECTION OF AN AGREEMENT.
THAT WILL CERTAINLY MAKE SENSE AS WELL AS CREATE A BRAND-NEW LAW BECAUSE OF THIS. AFTER THAT RETURN VIA LPT AND.
THE RECORD BACK TO COUNCIL.I THINK IT MAY NOT BE AS. I BELIEVE THAT THE SIGNIFICANCES OF THERE WE COULD COME UP WITH THE.
THAT ' S THE RATIONALE. AS WELL AS I ASSUME THAT WHILE WE ' VE ALL APPRECIATED THIS FOUR-HOUR DEBATE,. THE PROBLEM AND ALSO WE CANISTER REALLY MOVE FORWARD ON IT IN SPITE OF.
BACK TO CPC AND ALSO BOUNCING AROUND OUR MANAGEMENT. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THAT.
>> ALMOST SEEMS LIKE A CLOSE. DID THAT HELP, ALDERMAN DEMONG? > > NO. [Giggling]
> > I JUST NEEDED TO KNOW THAT ELSE. >> YOU DESIRED ON THE TASKFORCE.
> > IF YOU DESIRED ME TO APPOINT PEOPLE,
>> CAN I APPOINT ASSIGNINDIVIDUALS NOW.
I BELIEVE THAT'' S A VOLUNTEER. > >> Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I.
BELIEVE ALDERMAN DEMONG WILL BE.
AMONG INDIVIDUALS DESIGNATE. >> > > ABSOLUTELY. PETER, WELCOME ABOARD. YOU AND ALSO ANDRE– >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I.
THINK, IF I MAY, IF I MAY–.
>> > > I HAVE ACTUALLY SIMPLY LEARNED IN THIS COUNCIL SPACE WHAT'' S WRITTEN–.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I.
THINK I HEARD YOUR CONCERN AS BEING WILL THIS INVOLVE.
OR IS THIS SIMPLY 3 PARTICIPANTS OF COUNCIL GOING OFF AS WELL AS MAKING A.
DECISIONCHOICE > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: AND ALSO I.
THINK WHAT ALDERMAN MAR SAID CLAIMED THAT THIS TASKFORCE WOULD, OF.
PROGRAM, WORK WITH ADMINISTRATION.
IF YOU WANT TO INCLUDE WORDS TO, to GO FORWARD.AND.
> > IF I WANTED IT TO– IF I SIMPLY DESIRED IT TO
BE THAT I. WOULD HAVE MADE IT THE CHAIR OF. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU FOR NOT PRODUCTION IT THE MAYOR ALL BY HIMSELF.
> > I'SUGGEST CPS, I ' M JOKING. I ' M JOKING. I THINK THE OBJECTIVE OF
IT, IF'I. HAVEN SANCTUARY T ADDRESSED ATTENDED TO– > > EXCUSE ME.
CLOSE IF YOU DESIRE. >> > > OK. [Inaudible]> [Giggling] > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: ANYONE. ELSE ON THE REFERRAL MOTION? BEFORE I CONTACT ALDERMAN MAR TO CLOSE
. WE ' RE HAVING FUN HERE THESE DAYS,.
>> PEOPLE. ANY INDIVIDUAL ELSE? ALDERMAN MAR TO CLOSE. > > YOU SIMPLY'INFORMED ME TO TAKE A SEAT, NOW I ' M STANDING AGAIN. OKAY. SO I HOPE THAT MEMBERS OF COUNCIL UNDERSTAND THE OBJECTIVE OF.
IT. I'' M NOT TRYING TO MUDDY THE WATERS. RATHER, I'' M TRYING TO DEVELOP A.
SMALL ELEGANT OPTION IN WHICH WE CAN HAVE A TEAM OF MEMBERS OF.
COUNCIL, THREE IN NUMBER, ONE OF.
THEM BEING THE CHAIR OF LPT.WE CANISTER FIND OUT THAT THOSE OTHER.
MEMBERS ARE GOING TO BE DURING.
THE IN CAM SESSION OR WE CONTAINER SURVEY MEMBERS OF COUNCIL REGARDING A.
RATE OF INTEREST AND B DETERMINATION TO PERFORM.
IT. SEEMS WE HAVE A VOLUNTEER RIGHT.
THERE AND PERHAPS ALDERMAN.
PINCOTT'' S SHOWING HE'' S INTERESTED.
[Inaudible] NO, NO, NOT ME. BUT ALSO THE OBJECTIVE OF IT IS.
THAT WE CAN RECORD BACK TO LPT.
WITH THE CHOICE NO LATER THAT THAN JUNE. IF WE CAN COME BACK SOONER AS WELL AS.
PRODUCE REGARDS TO REFERENCE AFTER THAT NATURALLY WE'' RE GOING TO ATTRACT.
UPON THE RESOURCES OF OUR.
MANAGEMENT, OF PROGRAM WE'' RE GOING TO SPEAK TO OUR. STAKEHOLDERS BOTH PUBLIC AND ALSO.
SECTOR TO IDENTIFY WHAT MAKES ONE OF THE MOST FEELING GIVEN THIS NEW.
MODERN TECHNOLOGY. AND I WOULD REQUEST FOR YOUR SUPPORT ON THIS. THANKS. CLOSED, YOUR WORSHIP. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU, ALDERMAN MAR. ON THE ACTIVITY TO REFER, ARE WE CONCURRED? ANY OPPOSED? CALL THE ROLL, PLEASE.
( ROLL BEING CALLED).
(ROLL BEING CALLED). LUGGED, YOUR WORSHIP.
8-7. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:. CARRIED.
ALDERMAN MAR, I WILL CERTAINLY ACCEPT A. MOVEMENT TO ADD AS AN ITEM OF URGENT IN VIDEO CAMERA COMPANY THE. THANK YOU.
SIMPLY TO ADD THIS AS AN IN VIDEO CAMERA. PRODUCT. ARE WE'AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? LUGGED.
ALDERMAN MacLEOD WHILE WE ' RE

>>.
>> AT IT, I THINK YOU HAD AN THING.
YOU WANTED TO ADD. > > SECONDLY. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: RELOCATED. THAT ALDERMAN>> FARRELL HAD TO GO HOUSE. IS THAT WHAT IT WAS? > > TO INCLUDE IN THE IN CAM THING AN PRODUCT OF URGENT BUSINESS. IS IT An EMPLOYEE MATTER?
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: YOU CAN SAY WHAT IT IS, THE.
APPOINTMENT TO THE LIBRARY.
BOARD. >> > > THE CONSULTATION TO THE.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: YOU'' RE SECONDING, ALDERMAN FARRELL? > > YOUR PRAISE, ON A POINT OF TREATMENT. BEING AS COUNCIL JUST APPROVED.
THIS VISIT TO THIS BOARD THAT CLAIMED THAT WE'' RE. GOING TO PERFORM THIS TODAY, AT WHAT. POINT TODAY ARE WE GOING
>> TO BE DOING THIS? > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: WE. SIMPLY ADDED IT TO THE SCHEDULE. >

>> > THAT ' S WHAT THE VISIT.
IS? THAT'' S NOT COLLECTION BOARD. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: IT'' S. THE ONE THAT MAR INCLUDED.
>> > > SORRY, I MISSED THAT. I WAS SIMPLY THINKING OF HOW TO.
RESIGN FROM CHAIR.
[Giggling]> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: YOU.
HAVE UNTIL WE REACH THE IN.
CAMERA SESSION, ALDERMAN CHABOT. WE'' VE GOT PRODUCT 7.1 ON THE TABLE.
BELOW AS WELL AS I'' M GOING TO RESORT TO. MISS SLOAN SINCE WE'' VE DISPOSED OF 7.2, CANISTER WE TABLE 7.1 AT THIS.
>'> I ' M PREPARED TO IF YOU TAKE A. APPEARANCE AT YOUR PROGRAM THERE WAS SOME REFERRALS THAT I MADE.
AT PLANNING COMMISSION ON 2010.
OCTOBER 28, WHICH FUNDAMENTALLY– DIDN'' T. FUNDAMENTALLY, DID REVERSE THE.
REFERRAL OF PLANNING COMISSION, GIVE FIRST READING TO.
THE BYLAW, AMEND THE PROPOSED.
BYLAW AS FOLLOWS. RECOMMENDATION. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: GIVEN THAT, GIVEN THAT WE STILL DO.
NEED TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING,.
SO GIVEN THAT WHY DON'' T WE MOST LIKELY TO Mr. COPE AND LET'' S OBTAIN.
>> BEGUN. > > THANK YOU, YOUR WORSHIP.THE THING THAT

IS PRIOR TO YOU.
TODAY IS AN APPLICATION TO.
ASSIGN A SMALL ITEM OF LAND, THE LOCATION LAID OUT IN RED.
BESIDE McKNIGHT BLVD.
NORTHEAST BEING.006-HECTARES IN SIZE FROM THE EXISTING STI LAND.
USE DISTRICT TO A DC DIRECT.
CONTROL AREA TO ACCOMMODATE A DIGITAL 3RD PARTY.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING INDICATOR. THE PARENT PARCEL CURRENTLY HOUSES THE HERITAGE CHRISTIAN.
ACADEMY WHICH IS A PRIVATE.
SCHOOL. AT THE CURRENT TIME A 2 SIDED.
3RD PARTY ADVERTISING SIGN.
WITH A WEST FACING SIGN BEING A DIGITAL 3RD PARTY ADVERTISING.
INDICATION LIE ON THE AREA TO.
BE DESIGNATED. THE INDICATOR IN CONCERN WITH THE.
WEST FACE SHOWING THERE, NEITHER.
INDICATION HAS A VALID GROWTH LICENSE ALLOWING FOR THE USAGE. USING BACKGROUND, A THIRD PARTY.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING SIGN OR SIGNBOARD AS THEY'' RE COMMONLY CALLED WAS.
ACCEPTED ON THIS SITE AS A.
DISCRETIONARY USAGE UNDER THE I 2 AREA OF LAW 2 P 80. IN THE EARLY 1980s, WITH THE.
OPPORTUNITY OF A REVIEW EVERY 5 YEARS– A REVIVAL EVERY.
FIVE YEARS. THE LAST RENEWAL FOR THAT SIGN TOOK PLACE IN 1998. IN 200, AN ATTRACT THE LAW 2.
P 80 OCCURRED WHICH RESTRICTED 3RD PARTY ADVERTISING AND MARKETING SIGNS ON.
THIS SECTION OF McKNIGHT.
VIA TO THE PRESENT LAW 1
P. 2007. THE 3RD EVENT MARKETING SIGN.
IN 2008, THE THIRD CELEBRATION INDICATOR.
WAS REMOVED AND ALSO REPLACED WITH A.
NEW DIGITAL THIRD CELEBRATION MARKETING SIGN AGAIN WITHOUT.
ADVANTAGE OF An ADVANCEMENT AUTHORIZATION.
FOR THE NEW SIGN. THE SIGN CONTRAVENED NUMEROUS.
STIPULATIONS OF BYLAW 1 P 2007 IN.
TERMS OF SIGN LOCATION AND WAS ALSO NOT A NOTED USE IN THE SCI.
LAND USE AREA. THE NEW INDICATOR WAS TOPIC TO ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY FOR ELIMINATION.
WITH THE ORDER ON HOLD PENDING.
THE RESULT OF THESE PROCEDURES. TO ADDRESS THE CONCERN AT THAT.
TIME, THE APPLICANT APPLIED FOR A GROWTH AUTHORIZATION WHICH WAS.
REFUSED. THAT CHOICE WAS APPEALED TO SDAB WHICH LIKEWISE UPHELD THAT.
REFUSAL. AS A LAST RESOURCE, THIS LAND USE REDESIGNATION DEMAND IS THE.
LAST OPTION AVAILABLE FOR THE.
APPLICANT TO MAINTAIN THE PROHIBITED INDICATOR. THE LAW THAT IS PRIOR TO YOU.
THAT HAS ACTUALLY BEEN SUBMITTED HAS ACTUALLY BEEN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT. ITS PRIMARY FOCUS IS TO ENABLE.
FOR THE USAGE TO OCCUR IN THE BASE SCI DISTRICT AS WELL AS EXEMPT THE INDICATION.
FROM THE PLACE PROHIBITIONS.
ALONG McKNIGHT BOULEVARD.SPECIAL GUIDELINES HAVE BEEN.

INCORPORATED TO ADDRESS SEVERAL OF. THE ESTHETIC AND SAFETY-RELATED ISSUES THAT HAVE BEEN BROUGHT. AHEAD BY ADMINISTRATION.
IN THE OCCASION THE REDESIGNATION IS CONSIDERED MANAGEMENT.
WOULD NOTE THERE ARE STILL.
PROBLEMS WITH THE PRICE OF MODIFICATION OF THE VARIOUS PHOTOS AS WELL AS.
WITH THE LIGHT INTENSITY.
FORECASTED BY THE DIGITAL INDICATION ITSELF. IT MUST BE NOTED THAT THE.
SUGGESTED BYLAW ALSO DOES NOT ADDRESS THE OTHER BYLAW.
LEISURES WHICH WILL CERTAINLY FEED ON.
THE WEBSITE, INCLUDING SEPARATION FROM OTHER NONTHIRD EVENT.
ELECTRONIC MESSAGE CENTRES OR.
SPLITTING UP FOR A MAJOR OPEN SPACE. THE LAW RELAXATIONS ARE NOTED.
ON THE SCREEN AT THE EXISTING TIME. WE DO HAVE SOME WEBSITE PHOTOS. THIS IS REVEALING THE INDICATION WHICH IS IN LOCATION, YOU CAN JUST SEE IT.
TO THE RIGHT-HAND MAN OF YOUR.
DISPLAY. THIS IS TAKEN FROM THE.
CROSSWAY OF McKNIGHT.
BLVD AT 19th Road. ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT WE DO.
HAVE WITH THIS AUTHORIZE IS WITH.
REGARD TO SECURITY AS WELL AS ITS AREA TO A COMBINE LANE AND ALSO THE.
WEAVING LANES FROM McKNIGHT.
And Also 19th STREET. THIS IS ANOTHER SIGN SHOWING THE.
DISTANCE FROM AN EXISTING.
MESSAGE– OR ELECTRONIC MESSAGE INDICATOR WHICH IS LOCATED ON THE.
PORT OF PHONE CALL RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, 19th.
STREET AND ALSO THEN YOU TIN SEE THE INDICATOR AGAIN IN THE BACKGROUND.
BESIDE McKNIGHT.
BOULEVARD.THE NEXT SIGN–

OR IMAGE. INDICATES THE LOVED ONE CHANGE AT.
NIGHT IN TERMS OF THE SIGN IN COMPARISON TO THE SURROUNDING.
LIGHT SOURCES. A SIMILAR– HOWEVER THE REFLECTION MISBEHAVES ON THAT ONE.
[Inaudible] OUGHT TO ADDITIONALLY KEEP IN MIND WE HAVE A PHOTOGRAPH REVEALING THE FAMILY MEMBER.
TRANSFORM OF INTENSITY OF LIGHT.
IN BETWEEN THE DIGITAL INDICATION AS WELL AS THE ADJACENT … AND THE ADJACENT THIRD EVENT.
MARKETING INDICATORS. COMPONENT OF THE DISCUSSION THAT … SORRY. INDICATION SHOWING THE FAMILY MEMBER ADJUSTMENT THROUGHOUT THE DAY OF THE LIGHTS.
OF THE ELECTRONIC MESSAGE INDICATOR.
WHICH REMAINS IN THE FRONT FOREGROUND, AS WELL AS TWO VARIOUS OTHER THIRD.
EVENT INDICATORS FOUND FARTHER.
AWAY. IN CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION,.
THE ADMINISTRATION KEPT IN MIND THAT.
THE PROPOSAL WAS NOT REGULAR WITH THE BYLAW. WITH REGARD TO THE PROHIBITION.
OF THIRD CELEBRATION SIGNS ON McKNIGHT BLVD NOR WITH.
THE STIPULATIONS OF THE SCI.
DISTRICT.THE USE IS NOT CONSIDERED. PERSONAL COLLEGE AND ALSO THAT IS THE PRIMARY USAGE ON THE SUBJECT SITE. OF THE DIGITAL COMPONENT RESULTED IN A NUMBER OF ESTHETIC.
ISSUES WHICH HAVE ACTUALLY NOT BEEN SUFFICIENTLY ATTENDED TO. AS WELL AS THOSE CONTAINER BE EXPANDED UPON. BY OUR TRAFFIC ENGINEERS THAT ARE IN
THE AUDIENCE TODAY.

> > JUNE. > > YEAH. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THEY ' RE CONSIDERING– PERHAPS. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: AS WELL AS I.
THINK WHAT ALDERMAN MAR SAID WAS THAT THIS TASKFORCE WOULD, OF.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: MOVED.THE INDICATOR'' S PLACE IN CLOSE CLOSENESS TO THE SIGNIFICANT INTERSECTION, WEAVE and combine LANES PRODUCES A SIGNIFICANT POSSIBLE FOR MOTORIST INTERRUPTION AND ALSO AGENTS FROM THE TRANSPORTATION DIVISION CANISTER ADDRESS THAT ISSUE TOO. MANAGEMENT FOUND NO PLANNING QUALITY FOR USE THAT OR ELSE DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAND USAGE BYLAW. THERE WAS NO PHYSICAL PROBLEMS THAT WOULD SUGGEST SPECIAL CONSIDERATION BE GIVEN TO THIS SPECIFIC USAGE. IN THINKING ABOUT THE APPLICATION, CALGARY PREPARATION COMPENSATION HAD MANY ISSUES. THESE INCLUDED THE VIABILITY OF THE USAGE, PARTICULARLY WITH REGARD TO THE DIGITAL COMPONENT OF THE INDICATOR, WHETHER OR NOT THE USE A DC AREA WAS REALLY THE APPROPRIATE METHOD TO HANDLE THIS KIND OF AN APPLICATION. THERE WAS ALSO FACTOR TO CONSIDER GIVEN TO PERMIT THE INDICATOR TO REMAIN IN LOCATION UNTIL THE COMPLETION OF THE OVERALL INDICATION STUDY REVIEW IN 18 MONTHS TO 2 YEARS. AS WELL AS THE WEBSITE TRAFFIC SECURITY PROBLEMS CONNECTED WITH LOCATING THIS KEY IN OF A CHECK IN THIS DETAILS LOCATION.AS THERE WAS A VARIETY OF VARYING LEVELS OF OPINION ON THIS INDICATOR, CALGARY PLANNING COMISSION WAS UNABLE TO FIND TO A SPECIFIC SUGGESTION TO COUNCIL AS A.
OUTCOME OF A SPLIT ACTIVITY. THUS, CPC TRANSFERRED TO AHEAD.
THE APPLICATION TO THE PUBLIC.
HEARING WITHOUT THEIR RECOMMENDATION. THE ONLY.
RECOMMENDATION BEFORE YOU TODAY IS FROM ADMINISTRATION. THAT BEING THAT THE.
REDESIGNATION BE DECLINED AS WELL AS THAT BYLAW 1 D 2011 BE.
DESERTED.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK YOU, Mr. COPE. I HAVE BEEN EDUCATED BY Ms. SLOAN THAT IF ANY MEMBER OF COUNCIL WISHES TO TABLE THIS.
ISSUE, THIS WOULD BE THE MOMENT.
TO PUT THAT MOVEMENT AHEAD. PRIOR TO WE OPEN THE GENERAL PUBLIC.
HEARING. IS THERE SUCH A MOVEMENT OUT THERE?
> > YOUR WORSHIP, I QUESTION IF I COULD ASK MISS SLOAN THE RESULT. IN OTHER WORDS, WOULD ENFORCEMENT ACTION CONTINUE OR.
WOULD IT GO INTO– BE ALLOWED.
TO CONTINUE UNTIL SUCH TIME AS EITHER THE TASKFORCE HAS.
FINISHED ITS FUNCTION AND/OR THE.
INDICATOR REVIEW THAT ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDED …
[Indistinct]>> > > YOUR WORSHIP, IT TRULY RELIES ON THE PARAMETERS OF THE.
MY RECOMMENDATIONS IS THAT IF IT'' S TO BE TABLED IT OUGHT TO BE TABLED TO A. SPECIFICATION DAY SO THAT WE DO NOT HAVE. NOT COLLECTION FOR THE VARIOUS OTHER ISSUE TO RETURN TO COUNCIL,'I ' M NOT
SURECERTAIN > > CORRECT ME IF I'' M WRONG, YOUR.
PRAYER, BUT I THINK THE.
TASKFORCE WAS TO REPORT BY JUNE, WAS IT NOT?
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THE.
TASKFORCE WAS SUPPOSED TO RECORD NO LATER THAN JUNE TO LPT. IMPLYING AS IT WENDS ITS MEANS.
VIA THE PROCEDURE IF THERE'' S A BYLAW CHANGE IT NEEDS TO GO TO. CPC WHICH INDICATES IT MAY NOT GO.
BACK TO COUNCIL BEFORE SEPTEMBER UNLESS THE TASK REQUIRE OBTAINS IT TO.
LPT BY MAY.
>> > > I WAS TO TABLE THIS NOW TO NOT LATER THAN DECEMBER, WOULD.
THAT– WHAT WOULD THE RESULT OF. THAT BE? > > YOUR PRAISE, JOINED VER WE ' D HE. TO READVERTISE. WE DEMAND TO HAVE A SPECIFIC DATE THAT THE PUBLIC RECOGNIZES TO COME.
IF THEY DESIRE TO SPEAK TO, back.
THIS PRODUCT.

>> > > WHAT ' S THE GENERAL PUBLIC HEARING.
DATE IN DECEMBER? WOULD THAT SATISFY IT? >> > > IT COULD. ANOTHER CHOICE IS TO TABLE IT TO.
A DAY SOONER IF YOU SO PICK AS WELL AS IT CAN ONCE MORE BE RETABLED TO.
A SPECIFIC DAY.
>> >'> I ' M THINKING ON MY FEET RIGHT HERE FOR A MINUTE. YOUR PRAISE, I WILL TABLE THIS.
> > Mr. CHAIR OR
Mr. MAYOR,. I ' M SIMPLY WONDERING IF THE AREA.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: YOU. KNOW, BY PROCEDURE ANYONE CANISTER DO IT.
I BELIEVE THE AREA ALDERMAN IN.
QUESTION IS ACTUALLY ALDERMAN CHABOT NOW.
[Inaudible] IT CLAIMS CHABOT ON THE POINT.
SEE IF ALDERMAN JONES–. > > I WILL HAVE ALDERMAN JONES IF HE WOULD LIKE TO TABLE THIS TO. SEPTEMBER GIVEN THE JULY HAS A TENDENCY TO BE
A BIT LITTLE BIT A ZOO.
ALDERMAN JONES? > > I KIND OF LIKE THE ONE IN WAY. DUE TO THE FACT THAT I WASN ' T GOING TO BE.
HERE.YOUR PRAISE, I WAS CONSIDERING.
WITH THE BYLAW THAT WAS PRIOR TO US, WE WOULD PROBABLY HAVE TO. McKNIGHT BLVD SO I WAS THINKING OF TABLING IT AS WELL AS I WAS.
WAITING FOR MY TURN IN THE.
SCHEDULE. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: ACTIVITY.
TO TABLE THIS PRODUCT TO THE FIRST.
PUBLIC HEARING IN SEPTEMBER WHICH IS, MADAME STAFF?
12th OF SEPTEMBER. ALDERMAN LOWE IS SECONDING IT. ACTIVITY TO TABLE AS YOU RECOGNIZE IS.
NONDEBATABLE SO ON THIS ONE ARE.
WE AGREED? OH.
>> > > ALTHOUGH IT'' S NOT ARGUABLE,.
I ABSOLUTELY NEED SOME CLARIFICATION ON SOMETHING.
BEFORE I CAN VOTE ON THIS. THAT'' S RESPECT TO

… [Indiscernible] > > THANK YOU. > > YOUR PRAYER, THE EXISTING LAND USE WILL BE IN AREA
AND IF.
. IF THEIR SPECIFIC LAND USE DOES NOT PERMIT IT, AFTER THAT THEY.
ARE PRECLUDED FROM DOING SO. Mr. COPE CAN SOLUTION.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:. > > AT THE CURRENT TIME, THE VERMONT PERMIT
THAT THEY HAD. APPLY– GROWTH LICENSE THEY.
ORDER WHICH IS STILL IN LOCATION IS RESISTED PENDING THE END RESULT OF.
ALL THE OPTIONS FOR REVIEW.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: ALL RIGHT THEN. ON THE MOVEMENT TO TABLE, THEN,.
ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? QUITE POSSIBLY AFTER THAT. BROUGHT. THANK YOU. THAT TAKES United States THEN TO PRODUCT 8.1,.
THAT'' S CPC 2011-031 PROPOSED ROAD NAME AS WELL AS LAND
USE. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: ONE.
THING PRIOR TO YOU BEGINNING. MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, I'' M CLEANING.
THE QUEUE ON THE LIGHTS JUST FOR.
SIMPLENESS. IF YOU DESIRED YOUR LIGHT, TURN IT.
BACK ON. ALL RIGHT. >> > > MANY THANKS, Mr. CHAIRMAN. I DO HAVE COLOUR MAPPING HERE.
SHOWING THE UPGRADED R 1 S DISTRICTS THAT WERE PROVIDED BY.
THE CANDIDATE IF THEY'' D LIKE TO. THANK YOU, YOUR WORSHIP. ALONG WITH SUGGESTED ROAD NAMES FOR THE IMPACTED AREA.
THE LOCATION TO BE REDESIGNATION IS. 8.99-HECTARES AS OUTLINED IN RED AND BOUNDS ON SYMONS VALLEY ROAD.
NORTHWEST AND ALSO SAGE HILL DRIVE.
NORTHWEST ON THE EAST AND ALSO THE WEST SIDE RESPECTIVELY. PROPOSED REDESIGNATION WILL CERTAINLY TAKE.
THE LANDS FROM THE EXISTING S-FUD SPECIAL OBJECTIVE URBAN.
GROWTH– FUTURE URBAN.
GROWTH DISTRICT AND REDESIGNATE THE LANDS TO R 1.
RESIDENTIAL, R 1 S RESIDENTIAL.
TO FIT ADDITIONAL COLLECTIONS ALONG WITH M 1 MULTI-RESIDENTIAL.
LOW ACCOUNT AREA. THE OVERVIEW STRATEGY FOR THE LOCATION WAS THOUGHT ABOUT BY PLANNING.
COMMISSION AND APPROVED. THIS IS AN INSTANCE OF IT.THIS MAPPING

REVEALS THE UPDATED R.
1 S DISTRICT WHICH CALGARY.
PLANNING COMPENSATION IS ADVISING OCCURS ON THE.
FLANKAGE LOTS ALONG THE ROADS IN.
ALL THE AFFECTED AREAS. THE SUGGESTED REDESIGNATIONS WERE.
SUSTAINED BY PLANNING COMISSION. NEED TO ALSO NOTE THAT THE CHANGES TO THE R 1 S WERE.
SUPPORTED BY THE CANDIDATE. THEREFORE, THE SUGGESTION IS FOR COUNCIL TO ADOPT PROPOSED.
STREET LABELS OF SAGE BLUFF, SAGE.
HOLLOW AND SAGE POINT. ADOPT A SUGGESTED REDESIGNATION.
FROM SFUD TO R 1, R 1 S AND M 1. AND ALSO PROVIDE THREE READINGS TO LAW 22 D 2011.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
THANKS, Mr. COPE. ANY QUESTIONS OF EXPLANATION.
ALDERMAN LOWE? WE'' LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE DESIRE TO SPEAK IN FAVOUR.
OF THIS PRODUCT? ANYONE DESIRE TO SPEAK IN FAVOUR? >> > > YOUR PRAYER, MEMBERS OF.
COUNCIL, WITH BROWN AN.
ASSOCIATING PREPARING GROUP. I HAVE REPRESENTATIVES FROM.
KARMA, DA WATT AND STANTEC.
> > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER. THANK YOU, THIS LOOKS JUST LIKE A RESIDENTIAL AREA ONLY.
THERE IN DISTANCE TO THIS? DUE TO THE FACT THAT ALL I SEE RIGHT HERE ARE.
> > SURE. AS THE SAME LEVEL COMPONENT OF THE SAGE HILLSIDE AREA THERE'' S A VAST QUANTITY.
OF FEATURES NEARBY. TO THE SOUTHWEST GENESIS HAD AUTHORIZATION FOR– THERE'' S A. REGIONAL TOWN CENTRE WITH A TOD.
LOCATION JUST SOUTHWEST, UNITED HAS APPROVAL FOR A MIX OF EVEN MORE.
SOLITARY HOUSEHOLD AND ALSO MULTI-DIRECTLY.
TO THE WEST.DIRECTLY TO THE

SOUTH IS THE.
VARIOUS OTHER FIFTY PERCENT OF THE REDEVELOPMENT.
CELL. THIS CELL WAS SPECIAL IN THAT IT.
WAS SUBDIVIDED WHEN IT WAS WITH.
THE MD AND GOT ANNEXED IN. SO THAT AREA TO THE SOUTH GOT.
REDEVELOPED– OR IT'' S GONE.
VIA LAND USE AND ALSO IT'' S ALL HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY. AND AFTERWARDS TO THE EAST WE ALSO. HAVE AN APPROVAL FOR A BLENDED USAGE LOCATION AND ALSO SOME RESIDENTIAL, A.
COLLEGE WEBSITE AND TO THE NORTH.
SOME MORE HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY. AND SIMPLY TO THE EAST OF THAT IS.
THE WEST NOSE CREEK LOCATION. IT'' S QUITE– OVERALL WHEN YOU.
> > TO THE SOUTHWEST. THAT ENTIRE AREA, THERE'' S A FUTURE MIXED USAGE AND ALSO THERE ' S THE. BASICALLY EVERY LITTLE THING IN THAT SOUTH LOCATION THERE IS ALL REGIONAL.
COMMERCIAL.
>> > > WHICH ' S 600 METRE LINE THAT I SEE THERE?
>> > > YES. THAT ' S THE TOD LINE. >> > > THAT INCLUDES … > >
>> IT CONSISTS OF A SECTION– THE.

THICKNESS TO THE SOUTH WERE ACCEPTED AT 31.8 UNITS PER ACRE. WHEN YOU BALANCE THROUGHOUT, WHEN.
WHEN WE SAT DOWN WITH MANAGEMENT, WE LOOKED AT THIS AND.
THEY WERE HOPING FOR MORE OF AN.
8 TO 10 DEVICES PER ACRE WITH THE THINGS TO THE NORTH TO KIND OF.
BALANCE THE COMMUNITY. AND ALSO AT THE END OF THE DAY I THINK WE ENDED UP AT 17.2 UNITS.
PER ACRE.
>> > > WHAT ABOUT MR COMMITMENT? >> > > THE MR FOR THIS AREA WAS.
GIVEN TO THE MD, THERE WERE TWO.
WEBSITES THAT WERE CREATED.A SITE DIRECTLY

TO THE NORTH IF. YOU CHECK OUT THE REALLY TOP OF THE.
THERE'' S A METROPOLITAN GET. WE ' VE HAD SOME DISCUSSION WITH PARKS AS WELL AS THE TRUTH– OR PERHAPS.
THERE'' S AN OPPORTUNITY TO PERFORM A.
DISPOSITION AS WELL AS TRANSFER SOME INTO THE CENTRAL PART OF THE.
NEIGHBORHOOD. WE'' RE STILL WORKING ON THAT. THERE'' S SOME STUDIES AND WHAT.
NOT AND COMMUNICATION WE DEMAND TO.
HAVE WITH PARKS. JUCC DID APPEARANCE AT THAT AS PART OF.
OUR APPLICATION AS AN ALTERNATIVE. AND ALSO THEY WERE SUPPORTIVE IF WHATEVER EXERCISED WELL AND.
IT WAS ACCEPTABLE BY BOTH PARTIES.
THAT THEY WOULD SUPPORT A DISPOSITION. WE'' RE CURRENTLY LOOKING AT.
THAT.

>> > > BUT THAT DOESN'' T FORM PART OF.
>> THIS–. > > THAT WOULD BE MOVING A PIECE OF MR WITHIN THIS COMMUNITY. SO SIMPLY PUT RELOCATING SOME.
FROM THAT TOP PARCEL. >> > > BUT LEGISLATIVELY.
>> > >'IT ' S NOT A NEED. NO. WE'' VE ALREADY GIVEN ALL OF OUR.
>> MUNICIPAL GET. > > DIDN ' T MEAN TO BE– THANKS, YOUR PRAISE. NO FURTHER CONCERNS.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANKS, ALDERMAN CHABOT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE.
APPLICANT? EFFECTIVELY THEN. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE DESIRED TO TALK IN FAVOUR OF THIS PROPOSAL? ANYONE ELSE IN FAVOUR?
[Faint]> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: WE CONTAINER.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:
ANYONEANY PERSON ELSE WANTS TO SPEAK IN FAVOUR? ANYBODY WISHES TO TALK IN.
OPPOSITION.VERY WELL AFTER THAT.

WE WILL CERTAINLY SHUT THE PUBLIC HEARING.
AND TAKE QUESTIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND/OR.
REFERRAL. ALDERMAN LOWE. >> > > YOUR PRAYER,'I ' LL MOVE THE.
RECOMMENDATIONS PREPARING.
COMMISSION THREE ANALYSES OF THE LAWS AND ALSO I DIRECT OUT, COUNCIL,.
THAT WHEN WE PUT THE R. 1 S LOTS.
IN, THIS WAS VERY METICULOUSLY DONE GIVEN THE FORM AND ALSO NATURE OF.
THE LAND AS WELL AS THE METHOD THE.
COMMUNITY WAS BEING CREATED. THE– YOU'' LL NOTICE THAT THE.
R 1 S GREAT DEALS HAVE BEEN POSITIONED IN.
FLANKAGE FACILITATE CAR PARK AND THE GUIDELINES AROUND R 1 S AS WE.
UNDERSTAND IT TODAY. I'' D ASK YOUR ASSISTANCE. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I REALLY FEEL.
LIKE THAT PROBLEM MAY COME UP.
LATER IN THE PROGRAM SOMEWHERE. SIMPLY A FEELING. ALDERMAN COLLEY-URQUHART.
SECONDED. ALDERMAN CARRA?
>> > > MANY THANKS.'I ' VE GOT A QUESTION WITH THE TWO LONG LINEAR TYPE OF BLACK.
FRONTAGES THAT INSIDE I. ASSUME FRONT ON TO THE INNER ROAD NETWORK BUT BACK ON SAGE.
HILL DRIVE NORTHWEST AS WELL AS BACK ON.
TO SYMONS VALLEY ROAD NORTHWEST RESPECTIVELY. HAS THERE BEEN ANY FACTOR TO CONSIDER.
FOR THAT IS IN CHARGE OF THE UPKEEP AND ALSO UPKEEP OF THOSE.
SUPPORT WAYS THAT WILL BE.
SUPPORT ONTO THOSE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS?
>> > > I THINK BASIC TECHNIQUE,.
AND ALSO I WOULD STAND FIXED, IS THAT ANY REQUIREMENT FENCES THAT.
ARE BUILT AS COMPONENT OF THE.
SUBDIVISION PROCESS ARE LOCATED ON PERSONAL PROPERTY. AS WELL AS THEREFORE WOULD BE THE.
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL HOMEOWNER.
>> > > SO WHAT WE BEGIN TO ENTER.
IS THE TYPE OF MESS THAT WE'' VE ALREADY LEARNED THAT WE'' VE MADE.
FOR OURSELVES WHERE YOU HAVE A. PRIVATELY OWNED FENCES THAT GO INTO RIGHT INTO DIFFERENT STATES OF.
REPAIR SERVICE AS WELL AS DISREPAIR, AND NO.
IMPLIES TO HANDLE THEM EN MASSE.
>> > > UNLESS THE FENCE IS BEING.
> > THAT ' S WHAT I ' M ASKING, YES. > >> I'' M NOT CERTAIN FOR SAGE HILLSIDE.
MAY JUST BE A COMMON FENCE TO AVOID ACCESS TO SAGE HILLSIDE.
DRIVE. I THINK ALONG INDICATION EVALUATION MONTHS– SYMONS VALLEY ROADWAY.
NORTHWEST THERE IS A GRADE.
DIFFERENTIAL THERE SO THE REQUIREMENT FOR SOUND ATTENUATION FENCING.
MIGHT NOT BE REQUIRED. HOWEVER, I'' D NEED TO GO BACK TO THE JUT LINE STRATEGY TO CONFIRM. THAT. > >– OVERVIEW STRATEGY TO VERIFY THAT.
>> > > IN GENERAL, I COMPREHEND THE.
LAYOUT OF THIS BUT I THINK THAT WE'' RE MAKING MISTAKES BY. CREATING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THAT IS SINGLE.
PACKED AND BORDERED BY RIGHT OF WAY ON BOTH SIDES. WHAT WE'' RE BASICALLY DOING IS.
DEVELOPING RESIDENCES THAT COULDN'' T EVEN START TO. ADDRESS– THEY'' VE GOT TWO.

ROADWAYS, BASICALLY.SO FROM THE REAL ESTATE TAX BASE.
THAT WE'' RE PULLING OUT OF THE.
LOCATION, WE'' RE DOUBLE LOADING THE TAX OBLIGATION LOTS. AND ALSO FROM An UPKEEP.
VIEWPOINT, WE'' RE STARTING TO CREATE TROUBLES. WAS ANY OF THIS DISCUSSED AT.
CPC? >> > > NONE OF THAT WAS DISCUSSED AT.
> > AND ALSO THAT ' S RIGHT THROUGHOUT THE. STREET FROM THE SCHOOL SITE? > > IS THERE ANY– IS THERE ANY PROVISION MADE FOR KIDS WHO LIVE.
IN THIS AREA TO CROSS.
SYMONS VALLEY INSTITUTION WEBSITE? >> > > ONLY AT THE CROSSWAYS.
CONTROLLED BY TRAFFIC SIGNAL.
>> > > IS IT A MONO PATHWAY OR A DIVIDED PATHWAY ALONG. 136th method? > > WHICH IS THE SOUTH BORDER THERE
>>? > > YEAH. > > I SUSPECT THAT WOULD PROBABLY BE A MONO. COULD BE EITHER, APPARENTLY.
>> > > MAYBE EITHER?
>> > > COULD BE EITHER.
> > NO–. > > WORKED OUT–. > > GROWTH CONTRACT WITH PART OF THE SUBDIVISION.
UPKEEP OF THE– BECAUSE WE'' VE ALREADY GOT OURSELVES INTO.
ARE WE REPEATING MISTAKES OF THE PAST? > > YOUR PRAISE, PERHAPS I COULD SIMPLY ADD THERE IS An EVALUATION.
UNDERWAY CURRENTLY OF THE FENCE.
UPKEEP POLICY FOR THE FACTORS YOU HAVE ACTUALLY IDENTIFIED AND ALSO.
IT'' S BEING LED BY THE SUPERVISOR.
OF ROADWAYS AND I THINK ALDERMAN STEVENSON HAS BEEN ONE OF THE.
INDIVIDUALS LEADING THE FEE BEHIND.
I'' M NOT SURE OF THE TIME FRAME. FOR COVERAGE.
HAVE BEEN PROBLEMS IN THE PAST OF.
EXACTLY THE NATURE THAT YOU'' RE IDENTIFYING. THERE ISN ' T A QUICK ANSW TO >>. IT,'SADLY.
> > SO I ' VE ALSO ASKED TO BE.
PART– ALDERMAN STEVENSON, HAS. THAT BOARD MET YET SINCE WE DISCUSSED IT?
>> > > NO, IT ' S MOVING GRADUALLY.
>> > > IT HASN ' T MET. I JUST REMAINED IN A MEETING ABOUT. 3 OR FOUR WEEKS EARLIER SIMPLY TO.
OBTAIN THE SPHERE ROLLING. >> >'> I ' M EAGER TO BE A COMPONENT OF.
THAT. AND I'' M JUST EXAMINING ARE WE JUST CREATING EVEN MORE OF A MESS FOR.
OURSELVES PRIOR TO WE'' VE SOLVED IT. RIGHT HERE? > >> UNFORTUNATELY, THERE ISN''
T AN.
>> EASY RESPONSE TO IT. > > THE CONVENIENCE I WHY I ADDRESS IS TO– VERY EASY RESPONSE IS TO PUT THE. UPKEEP OF THAT FENCING INTO.

SOME KIND OF COMMON TITLE.DOES THAT TAKE PLACE RIGHT HERE OR AT
THE. DB PHASE
>>? > > EVEN WITH THE SUGGESTION THAT YOU'' RE PRODUCTION THAT.
ISN'' T THE RESPONSE AS I COMPREHEND. THERE ISN'' T A BASIC RESPONSE TO IT AS WELL AS WE COULDN ' T DO SOMETHING.
BELOW ON THE FLOOR OF COUNCIL IN.
THAT REGARD. >> > > WOULD IT HAPPEN AT THIS STAGE.
OR WOULD IT TAKE PLACE AT THE DP.
PHASE? SOLVING THIS IN REQUISITES OF–.
>> > > THERE IS NO ADVANCEMENT.
PERMIT REQUIRED FOR THAT. >> > > O.K. SO THEY GO RIGHT TO A.
BUILDING LICENSE.
>> > > THE INDIVIDUAL RESIDENCE DO THEIR– THE COMMON FENCE WOULD.
BE PROVIDED. BY THE DEVELOPER.BUT IT ' S THE CONCERN OF LASTING. UPKEEP THAT WE ARE.
> > SO IN THE>> LACK OF HAVING SOLVED IT, WE'' RE CREATING EVEN MORE. > > WELL, WE ' RE HOPING TO FIND A SOLUTION, BUT WE ARE ADD TO THIS.
EXISTING PROBLEM.
>> > > O.K..
THANK YOU. [Please Wait]>> > > ADVANCEMENT AUTHORIZATION.
>> AUTHORIZATION.
>> > > ARRANGEMENT, YES. >> > > FOR'THE SERVICE. > > THERE ' S ABSOLUTELY NOTHING YET>> ON. THIS, IS THERE? > > NO, ONLY THE OVERVIEW STRATEGY HASN ' T BEEN APPROVED.
THE CONDITION– REGARDS TO. GROWTH? > > NO, AS FAR AS THAT LICENSE OF.
> > O.K.. WE SANCTUARY'' T REALLY CREATED.
THIS ISSUE YET. >> > > PHYSICALLY WE HAVE NOT, NO.
>> > > OK. WE ' RE WORKING ON CREATING An ISSUE.
>> > >'WE ' RE WORKING WITH IT. HALF LAUGH.

>> > > IN REGARDS TO REGIONAL.
WHEELCHAIR CHOICES, ALL I SEE.
ISMONLITHIC SIDEWALKS. I PUT ON'' T SEE ANY REGIONAL. PATHWAY. EXISTS ANYTHING IN HERE? >> > > BELIEVE THE PATHS WERE.
SHOWN IN THIS AREA MAP.
RUNNING ALONG THE GORGE ALONG 37th– OR SORRY, SAGE HILLSIDE.
DRIVE NORTHWEST, THE RED LINES. THIS AREA WILL CERTAINLY LINK TO THE WEST, DOW DOWN TO THE GORGE SYM.
AS WELL AS OVER TO WEST NOSE CREEK. ASIDE FROM THAT IT WOULD HAVE TO CONNECT THROUGH THE WALKWAY.
SYSTEM RIGHT INTO THE LOCAL NETWORK.
ALONG THE CREEK. >> > > UNLESS SOMETHING COMES UP.
FROM THE SOUTH THROUGH THAT.
VARIOUS OTHER GROWTH. >> > >'WE ' LL LEAVE THAT– I THINK.
THAT IS THE INSTANCE BUT THERE'' S. ALWAYS THAT CHOICE I SUPPOSE. >> > > THAT HASN ' T BEEN BASED ON A.
PLAN YET?
>> > > THE LANDS TO THE SOUTH HAVE OVERVIEW PLAN APPROVAL AS WELL AS LAND.
USE.
>> > > OK. AND ALSO NO LOCAL PATH GOING.
WITH THERE?
>> > > NO, I BELIEVE IT ' S SHOWN ALONG SAGE HILL DRIVE.
>> > > AND ALSO WHERE THAT FUTURE INSTITUTION.
WEBSITE IS THERE, WHAT IS THAT I SEE IN BOTTOM RIGHT-HAND EDGE,.
IS THAT A LITTLE LITTLE BIT OF GREEN.
SPACE THERE, FUTURE COLLEGE WEBSITE TO THE EAST? YEP, IF YOU KEEP FOLLOWING THAT.
THROUGH, YEAH, RIGHT THERE, RIGHT IN THAT LITTLE EDGE DOWN.
THERE IS THAT A LITTLE BIT OF.
ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY THAT I SEE THERE.

>> > > YES, THE RED LINE WOULD BE.
THE PATHWAY THAT RUNS THROUGH.
THE NOSE CREEK SYSTEM. THAT WOULD BE THE LIMIT.
IN BETWEEN THE NEARBY– I.
BELIEVE THAT'' S THE EXISTING GRANGE DOWN THERE WHICH IS.
> > I'SEE, I ' M SORRY, YEAH, THAT. WOULD BE A PORT FROM THE ROADWAY INTO THE NOSE CREEK PARK.
SYSTEM, WEST NOSE CREEK PARK.
SYSTEM.

>> > > ALMOST RESEMBLES IT MIGHT.
THOSE ARE ALL THE QUESTIONS I.
HAVE. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: MANY THANKS.
QUITE, ALDERMAN CHABOT, ANY.
INQUIRIES OR ADMINISTRATION OR DEBATE ON THIS ISSUE? INDEED.
>> > > WHOSE LAYOUT IS THIS? THAT IS THE WRITER OF THIS.
DIAGRAM?
>> > > I WAS SUPPLIED TO US BY BROWN AND ALSO ORGANIZATION.
>> > > I GUESS MY ONLY INQUIRY IS.
WHY A WALKWAY WHICH IS THE STRAIGHT FEATURE IS DEFINED BY.
AN ASTERISK.
>> > > SORRY, THOSE RED ASTERISKS, AM I CHECKING OUT THAT RIGHT THAT.
> > NO, THE WALKWAYS ARE SHOWN IN RED. > > SO WHAT ' S THE ASTERISK? >'> I ' M SORRY, THEY REQUIREMENT BE THE THREE-METRE WALKWAYS THAT.
CONNECT ROADWAYS TO OTHER ROAD.
MIDSECTION BETWEEN LOTS.ROADWAYS BETWEEN LOTS. > > OH, I SEE THERE.
>> THERE ARE CONNECTIONS THROUGH CUL-DE-SAC FOR HUMAN BEINGS AS OPPOSED.
TO AUTOMOBILES.
>> > > MAJOR ROADWAYS. >> > > O.K..
>> THANKS. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANKS, ALDERMAN MAR. ALD LOWE, DID YOU WISHED TO SHUT? WHAT DID I CLAIM? OH, DEAR!
( GIGGLING).
CLOSED. ON THE REFERRALS, THEN,.
> > ANY OPPOSED? I BELIEVE I SIMPLY SAW 2, LOWE–.
OH, MY GOSH. SHEDDING ALL YOUR NAMED. CARRA AND FARRELL ARE OPPOSED. ANY PERSON ELSE? OK. WE'' LL GO INTO THE ANALYSES IN.
THE LAW THEN. FIRST ANALYSIS OF THE LAW, ARE.
ANY OPPOSED? CARRA IS OPPOSED AS WELL AS FARRELL.
ANY OPPOSED? SECOND ANALYSIS OF THE LAW? ANY OPPOSED?
OF THE BYLAW, THIS SET I NEED TO.
ANY OPPOSED? 3RD ANALYSIS OF THE LAW SAME.
DIVISION, AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? THANK YOU.
GIVEN AS An INTERACTION EASE OF ACCESS ACTION AND ALSO IS NOT.
INTENDED AS A VERBATIM.
RECORDS OF THE PROCEEDINGS. IF INACCURACIES OCCUR, IT MAY BE.
BECAUSE OF HUMAN MISTAKE, TECHNICAL.
DIFFICULTIES, OR AN LACK OF ABILITY FOR THE WRITER TO HEAR.
OR UNDERSTAND WHAT IS BEING.
STATED.

> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK YOU, Mr. COPE. > > AT THE CURRENT TIME, THE VERMONT PERMIT
THAT THEY HAD. > > THANK YOU, Mr. CHAIRMAN. > > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER. > > THE MR FOR THIS LOCATION WAS.WHILE BEST SHOT ARE MADE TO FILE AS CLOSELY AS
POSSIBLE WHAT IS BEING CLAIMED, THE
CAPTIONS CONTAINER NOT BE RELIED UPON AS A CERTIFIED ACCURATE RECORD
OF THE PROCEEDINGS.”” ROADWAY
CLOSURE AND ALSO LAN LAND-USE REDESIGNATION IN SCARBOROUGH,
PRODUCT CPC 2011-32.
>> > > MANY THANKS, YOUR WORSHIP.IT INCORPORATES A ROAD CLOSURE
APPLICATION, 2RC 1 THE NEARBY
LAND USAGE IN WEBSITE. THE LAND CONCERNED IS SHOWN ON
RED IN THE AREA MAP AS WELL AS THE
LAND WHICH PRESENTLY DEVELOPS COMPONENT OF THE CHURCH PROPERTY AS WELL AS IS
OPTIONAL FOR TRAVEL. PROPOSAL IS TO THROW AWAY THIS CLOSED ROAD AS WELL AS MARKET THE LAND OR
EXCHANGE THE LAND WITH THE
CHURCH ON THE ADJACENT WEBSITE. THE PROPOSITION WAS CONSIDERED BY
INTENDING COMPENSATION. THEY ARE SUGGESTING THAT COUNCIL ADOPT THE PROPOSED
CLOSURE AND GIVE 3 ANALYSES
TO BYLAWS 3C-2011.

AS WELL AS SECONDLY THAT THEY ADOPT A.
PROPOSED REDESIGNATION FROM.
UNDESIGNATED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO RC 1 AS WELL AS GIVE THREE ANALYSES.
TO BYLAW 23-D-2011. AREA IN QUESTION BEING SHOWN ON THE DISPLAY TODAY.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU, Mr. COPE. ANY QUESTIONS OR EXPLANATION.
FOR MANAGEMENT? ALDERMAN CARRA, CLARIFICATION? >> >'> I ' M ASSUMING THAT THE. LAND-USE REDESIGNATION IS TO.
BRING IT– IS THE CHURCH PRESENTLY THE–.
>> > > THE CHURCH IS CURRENT ZONED.
RC 1. >> > > OK, MANY THANKS.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
MANY THANKS, Mr. EXTENT. WE'' LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING
,. ANYONE DESIRE TO SPEAK IN FAVOUR.
OF THIS APPLICATION? ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOUR? ANYBODY DREAM TO SPEAK IN.
OPPOSITION TO THIS APPLICATION? ANY INDIVIDUAL DREAM TO SPEAK IN.
ALL RIGHT, AFTER THAT, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. > > AT THIS TIME I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THE SUGGESTION TO THE.
ADMINISTRATION. THANKS.

>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU. ALDERMAN FARRELL IS SECOND. ANY QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION ON.
THIS? ALL RIGHT, THEN, ON THE SUGGESTIONS ARE WE CONCURRED? ANY OPPOSED? BROUGHT. BYLAW 3C2011, FIRST ANALYSIS OF.
THE BYLAW ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? CARRIED, SECOND ANALYSIS OF THE.
BYLAW ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED. LUGGED. PERMISSION FOR 3RD READING.
OF THE BYLAW, ARE WE CONCURRED? ANY OPPOSED? BROUGHT. THIRD ANALYSIS OF THE BYLAW ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? BROUGHT. AND ON LAW 23D2011, FIRST.
ANALYSIS OF THE LAW ARE WE.
AGREED? 2ND ANALYSIS OF THE BYLAW ARE.
PERMISSION FOR 3RD ANALYSIS OF THE LAW ARE WE AGREED? AS WELL AS 3RD READING OF THE BYLAW.
ARE WE AGREED? > > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAISE. THE PROPOSITION IS TO TAKE THE LAND.
FROM THE EXISTING R2M RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE.
HOUSE DISTRICT AS WELL AS.
REDESIGNATE THE LANDS TO R2 RESIDENTIAL ONE AS WELL AS TWO DWELLING.
AREA. THE OBJECTIVE OF THE REDESIGNATION IS TO ENABLE THE PERSON.
SITES WHICH HAVE BEEN FORMERLY.
ACCEPTED TO HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED WITH ABSOLUTELY NO WHOLE LOT LINE KIND SINGLE.
SEPARATED ADVANCEMENT. OUGHT TO NOTE AS A RESULT OF THIS REDESIGNATION THERE WILL BE NO.
ALTER FOR THE ACTUAL DENSITY OF.
THE WEBSITE, 59 WHOLE LOTS REALLY REMAINING TO BE DEVELOPED. ROPOSED REDESIGNATION WILL CERTAINLY ALLOW.
FOR THE SOLITARY DEATTACHED HOUSES TO BE CONSIDERED An USAGE LEADING.
TO A DISCRETIONARY GROWTH.
PERMIT FOR EACH OF THE SITES.THEREFORE CONSIDERATION OF THE. FACTS ARE RECOMMENDING THAT.
COUNCIL ADOPT A PROPOSED REDESIGNATION FROM R2M TO R2 AND. THAT 3 READINGS BE GIVEN TO. PROPOSED LAW 24D-2011.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: MANY THANKS. VERY MUCH, Mr. COPE. ANY QUESTIONS OR EXPLANATION FOR MANAGEMENT, ALDERMAN. CHABOT? > > MANY THANKS YOUR PRAYER. Mr. COPE, R2 LISTS SECONDARY
>>. SUITE SAYS AS A PERMITTED USE SO. IF IT TRANSITION TO R2 MAYBE 59 GREAT DEALS WITH SECOND–.
> > PERMITTED USES THERE WOULD BE. THAT OPPORTUNITY FOR SECONDARY SUITES IN EACH OF THE UNITS,.
YES. > > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAISE. NO FURTHER QUESTIONS.
WE ' LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. ON PART OF GEN TAR, WE ' RE THE APPLICATIONS, I ' M DELIGHTED TO. ANSWER ANY CONCERNS.
> > > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi
>> >>: I HAVE. ONE. I THOUGHT I HEARD Mr.COPE SAY

THAT THE GENERAL THICKNESS IS NOT.
TRANSFORMING.
>> > > IT WON ' T MODIFICATION. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: SO.
WE'' RE MOVING TO A PLACE WHERE IT
. COULD HAVE DUPLEXES. >> > > IT COULD HAVE TAKEN.
SEMIDETACHED AS WELL AS RATHER WE'' RE. TAKING A LOOK AT A DIFFERENT ITEM THAT PRESERVES THE SAME THICKNESS,.
EXCEPT WITH THE ZERO WHOLE LOT LINE IT.
PROVIDES ANOTHER PRODUCT IN THIS AREA. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THESE.
WILL BE DETACHED.
>> > > YES, THE SERVICING AS WELL AS THE METHOD IT'' S BEEN WHOLE LOT OUT WE COULD.
DO REGARDLESS. THE ZERO LOT LINE OR THE SEMIDETACHED.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE.
APPLICANT, AL ALDERMAN CARRA?
>> > > YES, CONTAINER YOU GIVE ME A LITTLE EVEN MORE QUALITY REGARDING WHAT THAT.
> > SURE. THIS HERE IS SIMPLY A SAMPLE OF
. WHAT A NO WHOLE LOT LINE PRODUCT WOULD LOOK LIKE.
SUBMITTED FOR THIS LOCATION AS WELL AS WHETHER WE GO SEMI DETACHED.
SYSTEMS OR WE OPT FOR THE SAMPLE.
STREETSCAPE, IT WOULD LOT OUT EXACTLY THE SAME. THE ONE THING WE WILL NEED TO DO.
WITH THE ABSOLUTELY NO WHOLE LOT LINE IS WE DO NEED TO SUBMIT A COMPREHENSIVE.
ADVANCEMENT LICENSE FOR THE WHOLE.
AREA BECAUSE YOU'' RE GOING WITH A ZERO LOT LINE. THERE'' S BASICALLY A RELAXATION.
AND ALSO THERE'' S SOME OTHER STRUCTURE CODE ELEMENTS THAT BEGIN. THERE WILL BE ANOTHER DEGREE.
OF APPLICATION THAT OBTAINS SENT. ON A DETAILED DEGREE AND ALSO.
THAT WILL CERTAINLY PROVIDE THE CITY THE ASSURANCES OF THE ITEM THAT.
WOULD BE GOING INTO THE ABSOLUTELY NO GREAT DEAL.
LINE PRODUCT.

>> > > EXPLAIN WHAT ZERO GREAT DEAL LINE.
HOW THAT PUTS ON WHAT LOOKS.
LIKE– >> > >'IT ' S A TYPICAL. IT OFFERS A FIVE-FOOT RANGE. BETWEEN YOUR HOUSES.
THERE ' S FIRE CONSTRUCTION.
ELEMENTS THAT BELONG TO THE. RESIDENCES SO THEY END UP A BIT CLOSER TOGETHER SO. BASICALLY YOU'' RE ALMOST TAKING.
THE RANGE THAT YOU WOULD HAVE WITH A SEMI, YOU'' RE OFFERING A.
BIT EVEN MORE SORT OF BETWEEN.
THE HOMES, NOT AS HIGH AS YOU WOULD OBTAIN IN A TYPICAL.
SUBDIVISION OR A TYPICAL R1.
ZONING, FOR INSTANCE, OR R2 ZONING BUT IT JUST BRINGS THEM A.
BIT CLOSER AND YOU PROVIDE A.
DIFFERENT PRODUCT SO YOU END UP WITH A SOLITARY FAMILY HOUSE BUT.
AT THE EXACT SAME THICKNESS DEGREE AS A.
SEMI. SO A VARIOUS PRODUCT FOR THE.
LOCATION THAT WILL– MARK IT.
CURRENTLY AS SIMPLY REACTING TO EFFECTIVELY.
>> > > WHAT DOES THE POLISHING APPEARANCE.
LIKE ON THOSE, ON THE SIDE YARDS.
>> > > I MIGHT HAVE TO OBTAIN PAUL FROM.
GEN CELEBRITY TO SPEAK ABOUT THAT BECAUSE HE'' S BEEN IN CONTACT.
WITH THE HOME BUILDERS EVEN MORE SO THAN.
> > NO,'I ' M INTERESTED IN THAT. IT APPEARS TO ME LIKE WE'' RE GOING FOR LIKE, YOU RECOGNIZE, THE
DENSITYTHICKNESS
ECOLOGICAL EFFICIENCY OF PARTY WALLS, SO IF WE'' RE DOING. THAT THE QUESTION IS WHAT ARE.
THE ADVANTAGES AND ALSO I WOULD HOPE IT'' S TYPE OF LIKE THE FLOODING OF.
LIGHT THAT ENTERS THE SPACES,.
DUE TO ALL THE GLAZING ON THE SIDE WALLS BUT WITH SIDE.
FEET THAT DOESN'' T ENABLE LOW. UNDER THE FIRE CODE SO I'' M JUST CURIOUS. >> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
ALDERMAN CARRA I ALSO AM INTERESTED AS WELL AS THIS IS VERY INTRIGUING AND ALSO.
I WILL ALLOW IT BUT I SHOULD.
WARN YOU WE'' RE GOING PAST OUR JURISDICTION ON PUBLIC HEARING.
OF EXPLANATION ON THAT. I TIN
' T ANSWER RESPONSE QUESTIONCONCERN
UNDERSTANDING IS THERE IS NOT WINDOWS ON THE HOUSES THERE. > > THIS IS NOT IN THE INNER CITY.
WHERE YOU SEE INFILLS THAT SOME.
OF THEM ARE ATTACHED AS WELL AS A FEW OF THEM ARE SEPARATE BUT THEY'' RE. QUITE NEAR EACH OTHER. THIS SIMPLY ENABLES YOUR HOUSE TO BE BUILT EXACTLY ON THE RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY LINE.
AND THERE'' S AN ACCESS EASEMENT>.

> > OKAY.SO YOU HAVE ONE WALL SURFACE OF THE.
HOME ON THE RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY LINE AS WELL AS.
YOU GOT FIVE FEET AS WELL AS THEN YOU OBTAINED THE WALL OF THE HOUSE. EXISTS A SIDE LAWN.
PONDERED BECAUSE ROOM OR THERE–.
>> > > THERE ' S GAIN ACCESS TO EASEMENT
ON. THE VARIOUS OTHER SIDE OF EACH HOME. THERE'' S AN ACCESS EASEMENT SO.
THE VARIOUS OTHER HOUSE HAS ACCESSIBILITY ALONG.
THE SIDE YARD. THIS PRODUCT IS ACTUALLY QUITE.
COMMON IN THE CIT CITY OF CALGA.
>> > > OK.
>> THANKS.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:. MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN CARRA AND ALSO JUST FOR EXPLANATION DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE ' RE. OBTAINING TO AREAS OF SECURITY CODE,.
WHICH ARE OUTSIDE OF THE TERRITORY THAT WE HAVE TODAY.
>> > > YEAH, WELL JUST A POINT–.
JUST TO POINT OUT WHAT I MEAN.YEAH, I PRESUME I WAS ASKING, I.
MEAN, WE'' VE ASKED FOR SURE. DENSITY AND AT SPECIFIC THICKNESS YOU OBTAIN SPECIFIC PERFORMANCES AS WELL AS.
IT LOOKS LIKE WE'' RE REMOVING. THAT PERFORMANCE FOR AN AESTHETIC APPEARANCE. I'' M SIMPLY LOOKING TO WRAP MY MIND.
AROUND THIS. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: FAIR.
SUFFICIENT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE.
APPLICANT WHO HAS ALREADY? ALL RIGHT, THEN. ANY INDIVIDUAL ELSE WANTED TO SPEAK IN.
FAVOUR OF THIS PROPOSITION? ANYONE DESIRE TO SPEAK IN RESISTANCE TO THIS PROPOSITION? WE'' LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
FINISH THIS SET? ALDERMAN DEMONG?
>> > > LIKE TO RELOCATE THE.
SUGGESTION TO THE ADMINISTRATION.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: AS WELL AS.
THANKS, ALDERMAN LOWE. ANY FURTHER CONVERSATION ON THIS ONE?
THANK YOU, ANY OPPOSED? ON FIRST READING OF THE BYLAW.
AGREED? SECOND READING OF THE BYLAW ARE.
AUTHORIZATION FOR 3RD READING OF THE LAW ARE WE AGREED? THIRD ANALYSIS OF THE BYLAW ARE.
WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? LUGGED.
SUPPLIED AS A COMMUNICATION.
EASE OF ACCESS MEASURE AND ALSO IS NOT INTENDED AS A VERBATIM.
RECORDS OF THE PROCEEDINGS. IF INACCURACIES OCCUR, IT MAY RESULT FROM HUMAN MISTAKE, TECHNICAL.
TROUBLES, OR AN FAILURE ON.
THE COMPONENT OF THE WRITER TO LISTEN TO OR UNDERSTAND WHAT IS BEING.
SAID.WHILE BEST EFFORTS ARE. > > EIGHT. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: SO WE ARE CURRENTLY AT THING 8.4 IN YOUR.
SCHEDULE. LAND USE REEXIT CLASSIFICATION IN.
THE AREAS OF MAHOGANY, Mr. COPE.
>> > > THAN MANY THANKS, YOUR WORSHIP. YOUR INFLUENCED BY THE PROSED REDESIGNATION IS OUTON THE.
DISPLAY. UNIQUE PURPOSE URBAN NATURE AREA AND ALSO REDESIGNATE THE.
LAND TO SSPR FOR MUNICIPAL PARK.
AND SPECIAL FUNCTION REGIONAL FACILITIES DISTRICT TO.
SUIT A CHECKLIST STATION. THOSE LANDS WERE FORMERLY DESIGNATE AS PART OF AN RUNDOWN.
STRATEGY PROCESS. DURING THAT TIME IT WASN'' T IDENTIFIED AT THE MAIN PATH. SYSTEM WOULD GO THROUGH THE.
NATURAL AREA. THE S.U.N DISTRICT IS MEANT.
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL GET TYPE.
USES. THAT WILL FIX THE SCENARIO,.
MARK TO LAND TO SSPR AND.
EVENTUALLY MR MUNICIPAL BOOK AS WELL AS THE PURPLE LOCATION BEING.
USED AS A CHECKLIST STATION. THIS WILL SUIT THE LAID OUT PLAN AS WELL AS IT WAS.
SUPPORTED BY THE CALGARY.
PREPARING COMMISSION.IN THAT RESPECT

THE CALGARY. INTENDING PAYMENT IS.
RECOMMENDING THAT COUNCIL ADOPT THE PRODAYSED REDESIGNATION AND ALSO.
THAT WILL READINGS BE GIVEN TO.
THE LAW. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
THERE, Mr. COPE. ANY QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION FOR MANAGEMENT? SEEING NONE, WE'' LL OPEN
THE. PUBLIC HEARING.
> > SO ACTION THE BYLAW AS WELL AS THE. > > BROUGHT. > >( INAUDIBLE ).
( AUDIO PROBLEMS). > > I WOULD LOVE TO MOVE THAT WE.
WOULD REFER– OR THAT WE,. SORRY, TABLE THIS FOR TWO MONTHS, PLEASE.
THE REASON IS THERE ' S A CENTRE. STREET QUARTER COMPREHENSIVE STUDY THAT'' S GOING TO BE DOIN '.
THIS LOCATION AND ALSO I ' M NOT CLEAR ON. > > YES. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
( INAUDIBLE).
>> > > YES, I MAY THROUGH TO CHAIR THROUGH Mr.WATSON.

SIMPLY WONDERING REGARDING THE TIMING.
OF THIS CENTRE STREET EVALUATION THAT'' S IN PROGRESS. > >> ALDERMAN CHABOT, WE'' RE JUST. BEGINNING TO EXTENT OUT THAT FUNCTION. IT DEFINITELY WON'' T BE DONE BY.
ALDERMAN HAS DESIRED TO TALK TO ME ABOUT AND ALSO AND ALSO WE'' RE IN. DIFFICULT TO CHOOSE IF COUNCIL WANTS TO PUT THIS OFF FOR 2 MONTHS.
TO HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS OR.
WHAT DO YOU WISHED TO PERFORM WITH IT TODAY?
>> > > IN 2 MONTHS WILL CERTAINLY WE BE.
FURTHER AHEAD IN THIS PROCEDURE? >> > >'WE ' LL KNOW A BIT MORE BUT I.
CAN'' T PROMOTE ALDERMAN. MacLEOD WHETHER SHE'' LL FEELING MORE COMFORTABLE PROCEEDING ON.
THIS TWO MONTHS FROM NOW. WISH TO PROVIDE SOME INFORMATION AND TALK WITH THE HIGHLAND PARK.
NEIGHBORHOOD.
>> > > THANKS FOR THAT.

>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN CHABOT. AS WELL AS CLARIFICATION, TABLING THE MOTION IN FRONT OF United States TO TABLE.
THIS TO MAY 9th COMBINED.
SATISFYING OF COUNCIL, NOT 19th. 9th. ON THAT TABLING MOTION ARE WE.
AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? ALDERMAN CHABOT IS OPPOSED. BROUGHT. THANK YOU. THAT TAKES United States TO PRODUCT 8.6 IN.
YOUR AGENDA. CPC 2011-036, LAND USAGE.
REDESIGNATION IN THE DOWNTOWN.
> > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAISE. THE LOCATION INFLUENCED BY THE PROPOSED REDESIGNATION IS.
LOCATED ON 7th Opportunity.
SOUTHWEST. THE LANDS INFLUENCED ARE DETAILED.
IN RED AND A FORMER PART OF.
THE EXISTING DIRECT CONTROL DISTRIBUTE CURRENTLY IN POSITION. IT WILL TAKE THE LANDS FROM THE.
DIRECT CONTROL DISTRICT WHICH IS TRIED TO PLANS AND ALSO REDESIGNATE.
THE LAND TO CENTIMETERS 2 MIDTOWN.
ORGANIZATION DISTRICT.THE REDESIGNATION

WILL PERMIT THE. SITE TO BE REDEVELOPED ON ITS. OWN IN A COMPARABLE PATTERN AS TO
THE ADJACENT LANDS. IN THAT RESPECT, IT IS. RECOMMENDED THAT COUNCIL ADOPT THE PROPOSED REDESIGNATION. THE AREA IMPACTED ON THE. PHOTOGRAPH SHOWN TO YOU RIGHT CURRENTLY, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT.
COUNCIL ADOPT A PROPOSED.
REDESIGNATION TO TAKE THE LANDS FROM DIRECT CONTROL TO CENTIMETERS 2 AND.
THAT THREE ANALYSES BE GIVEN TO.
PROPOSED BYLAW 27D-2011. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
CONCERNS OR INFORMATION FOR.
ADMINISTRATION, ALDERMAN CARRA? >> > > JUST An INQUIRY. I INDICATE, OBVIOUSLY THAT'' S A. PRETTY DIMINISH LITTLE STRETCH OF THE CONVERSATION OF THE.
HERITAGE PERSONALITY OF THE SITE.
AND ALSO WHETHER THERE SHOULD BE ANY– OR DOES THAT NOT TAKE.
LOCATION?
>> > > THAT WOULD OCCUR TOGETHER WITH ANY ADVANCEMENT.
ALLOW OF THE SITE. I NEED TO KEEP IN MIND THE EXISTING DC, A PART OF WHICH WILL CERTAINLY STAY ON.
8th Method, PART OF THAT.
DESIGNATION IS TO PROTECT THE HERITAGE PROBLEM OF THOSE.
SITES. ON 8th method, NOT THIS PARTICULAR SITE ON 7th.
>> > > SO IN TERMS OF PROTECTING, IS.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: ON. > > YES, THANK YOU, YOUR PRAISE. FORGIVE MY SIMPLE CONCERN, A FEATURE OF PROCESS, I ' M MINDFUL.
DIFFICULT LOCATION WITH SOME VERY CUTTING-EDGE METHODS TO AUTO PARKING. APPLICATION AT THIS FACTOR IN THE.
PROCEDURE. ARE YOU ABLE TO ADDRESS THAT
OR. IS THAT A FAIR INQUIRY TO YOU? > > I TIN ADDRESS IT BRIEFLY. I INTEND. THE CLASSIFICATION ON THE SITE. NOW IS DIRECT CONTROL WHICH IS TIED TO INTENDS. THERE IS NO OPPORTUNITY TO ACCOMPLISH. ANYTHING ELSE ON THE WEBSITE. ASIDE FROM THAT WAS INITIALLY. PROPOSED BACK IN 1983. WHICH IS CLEARLY NOT WHAT THE INTENTION OF THE CANDIDATES HAVE. TO ACCOMPLISH WITH LAND NOW. SO SO AS TO GET THE SITE INTO A POSITION WHERE ONGOING. INTENDING CANISTER OCCUR, THEY NEED TO. REDESIGNATION THE SITE TO PERMIT THAT TO HAPPEN. > > I THINK THAT ' S MY CONCERN. WHY DO WE NEED TO REDESIGNATE TO ALLOW FINANCING TO PROCEED? > > THAT WOULD NEED TO BE A. QUESTION TO PUT TO THE CANDIDATE. >> > EXISTS ANY INDIVIDUAL TO ADDRESS. THAT? MIGHT NOT BE APPROPRIATE? > >
>> YEAH. > > OK, THANKS, Mr.COPE.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:. WHAT ' S THE DISTINCTION? > > THE CENTIMETERS 2, THE STANDARD.

THE “A” INCENTIVE STIPULATIONS, “A”. TEAM STIPULATIONS.
USING TEAM “C” AND “D” BONUSING. TO DEVELOP UP YOUR THICKNESS ON THE SITE. IT HAVE PRIOR TO ME AT THIS TIME, THE EXISTING D.C.INCORPORATED.
EXACT SUGGESTED INTENDS THAT WERE BEING SUPPLIED THEREFORE THAT

EXACT.
THICKNESS IS NO LONGER AVAILABLE.
TO THE WEBSITE UNLESS THEY DO SOMETHING COMPARABLE WITH THE TEAM.
A, B, AND ALSO C STIPULATIONS.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK YOU. THAT ' S REALLY PRACTICAL.
SEE NOTHING FURTHER QUESTIONS OR> INFORMATION, WE ' LL OPEN THE. PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE DESIRE TO SPEAK IN FAVOUR OF THIS APPLICATION? ANYONE DREAM TO SPEAK IN FAVOUR? > > GOOD AFTERNOON. MY NAME IS NEIL RICHARDSON,. PRESIDENT OF HERITAGE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. CORPORATION, WE ' RE
>> THE CANDIDATE IN THIS ISSUE. I PUT ON ' T REALLY INTEND TO MAKE A. PRESENTATION BUT I ' LL CERTAINLY ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS COUNCIL MAY. HAVE. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: TERRIFIC. THANKS. ALDERMAN POOTMANS, DO YOU NEED. TO ASK YOUR QUESTION NOW? > > YES
, THANK>> YOU, AND THANK. YOU Mr. RICHARDSON. I ' M KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT YOUR PROJECTS AS WELL AS THE VARIETY OF FANTASTIC ONES.
YOU ' VE CONTRIBUTED TO THE. DOWNTOWN CORE. THANKS. SIMPLY An INQUIRY OF PROCESS AT.
THIS POINT, POSSIBLY IT ' S AN INDISCREET QUESTION SO IF YOU. WANT TO PREVENT IT, THAT ' S FINE. ARE YOUR INTENDS PROGRESSED TO A SPECIFIC POINT WHERE THIS IS.
NECESSARY? I ' M JUST INTRIGUED IN WHICH WE ' RE AT IN THIS PROCEDURE. > > WE ' VE BEEN DEALING WITH. ADMINISTRATION FOR A LITTLE OVER 2 YEARS.> WHEN WE FIRST CAME CLOSE TO THEM.
THERE WAS A DISCUSSION ABOUT WHETHER WE NEED TO OBTAIN OUR OWN D.C. ZONING FOR THE WEBSITE OR WHETHER. WE NEEDS TO DO WHAT WE ' RE DOING NOW WHICH IS TO PUT ON. REMOVING EXISTING D.C.AND.
WAGE THE DEVELOPMENT LICENSE. THE CHALLENGE WE HAVE IS THE.
SITE IS CURRENTLY

ZONED WITH LAND THAT WE DON ' T OWN. AND THE INITIAL 1983 PLAN WAS. OF THE LAND.
AT THE END OF THE DISCUSSIONS WITH THE MANAGEMENT, IT WAS.
WOULDN ' T BE TO APPLY FOR An ANOTHER D.C. ZONING BUT TO. AND GO THROUGH An ADVANCEMENT AUTHORIZATION PROCEDURE.
THAT ' S WHAT WE ' RE FINDING TO. DO. > > THANK YOU. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:. PERHAPS'Mr. WATSON'CONTAINER ADD A LITTLE MORE >> EXPLANATION TO>. THIS QUESTION.
> > MANY THANKS. > > THANKS. ACTUALLY Mr. RICHARDSON HAS.
ACTUALLY MADE IT
>> QUITE CLEAR >>. I HAD SOMETHING TO PERFORM WITH THE. 26-Z-83 WHICH WAS A STUNNING. ADVANCEMENT– I ' LL
TELL COUNCIL BUT IT WILL NEVER EVER BE RECOGNIZED. AS WELL AS IT IS AMONG THE CHALLENGES. WITH THE SEA– C WHICH OBTAINS STEAL– STAGNANT
EVENTUALLY. IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO PERFORM. ANYTHING ON THAT PARTICULAR WEBSITE WITH THE ZONING OTHER THAN TO DEVELOP SOMETHING. AUTHORIZED TWENTY YEARS BACK AND PARTLY. IT WAS ALL ONE OWNERSHIP AT because IT ' S A SPLIT OWNERSHIP NOW. THIS TIME AROUND– AT ONCE, THIS.
IS THE THE MAJORITY OF RELIABLE METHOD TO OBTAIN United States BACK TO A LEVEL PLAYING AREA.
SO WE CAN BEGINNING OVER AGAIN.
A HOUSEKEEPING MATTER IN ORDER TO GET TO US THE ZONING.
WE CANISTER CONTINUE CONVERSATION. ON Mr.RICHARDSON ' S SUGGESTION OR ANY OTHERS FROM THE MIDTOWN. > > MANY THANKS, Mr. WATSON.
MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN FARRELL MORE. > >> THANK YOU FOR BEING RIGHT HERE. TODAY, Mr. RICHARDSON.
I HAVE TO SAY >> A GREAT DEAL OF INDIVIDUALS TOOK A BREATH A SIGH OF ALLEVIATION WHEN. YOU PURCHASED THIS BLOCK. NOW WE NEED TO IDENTIFY HOW TO PROGRESS IN PRESERVING SOME. IMPORTANT HERITAGE. I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE ESSENTIAL FOR NEW MEMBERS OF COUNCIL
TO. UNDERSTAND WHAT YOUR ASPIRATIONS. IF YOU TAKE A MINUTE, are FOR THIS BLOCK SO I '
M WONDERING
MIN TO SIMPLY REVIEW A FEW OF YOUR. CONCEPTS SO THEY WOULD MAYBE TAKE INTO CONTEXT WHY THIS. APPLICATION IS PRIOR TO United States AS WELL AS HOW. CRUCIAL THIS BLOCK IS TO THE BACKGROUND OF CALGARY. > > I BELIEVE THAT THIS IS A VERY.
INTERESTING ASK USEFUL QUESTION AND I ' M WELCOME Mr. RICHARDSON. TO SOLUTION IT BRIEFLY BUT I WILL. ADVISE YOU THAT WE HAVE TO TAKE CARE NOT TO EXCEED WHAT.
WE ' RE BEING ASKED TO DETERMINE. WE ' RE NOT MAKING A DECISION ON. > > YES, AS WELL AS I ASSUME THAT '
S AN.
PREVIOUS >> PARTICIPANTS OF COUNCIL HAVE'BEEN AWARE OF THIS PROBLEM. IT ' S BEEN TALKED ABOUT FOR SOME. TIME. > > ESSENTIALLY, THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.'LIES MID BLOCK
ON 7t. >> 7th AVENUE. IT DOESN ' T INCLUDE LANDS TO.
THE EAST OR WEST OF SO IT IT ' S. SOMEWHAT LANDLOCKED. IT ' S ADDITIONALLY LOCATED ON 7t.
7th Method THAT ANYWAY VEHICLE. BECAUSE OF THE
LRT CORRIDOR, accessibility TO ITPASSAGE THE HERITAGE STRUCTURES ARE. MOST LIKELY ESSENTIAL SEPARATELY BUT THEY ' RE REALLY MORE.
VITAL– IMPORTANT AS A. COLLECTION.
THE HERITAGE PLAN CALLS IT.
STEVEN AVENUE ' S LITTLE SIBLING.
IT ' S ONE OF THE NEW INTACT'STREETSCAPES LEFT FROM THE EARLY. 1900s approximately ABOUT THE 1920s,
. 1930s.

> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
> >( FAINT ).
> > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER. > > SO IN TERMS OF PROTECTING, IS.
> > THANK YOU.OUR CONCEPT FOR THE SITE IS TO
RECOVER THE HERITAGE STRUCTURES
AS WELL AS PUT ARTS AND ALSO SOCIETY SO IT'' S SUITABLE WITH THE OLYMPIC
PLAZA CULTURAL DISTRICT, ART
CENTRAL NEARBY, THE GRAND THEATER A BLOCK OR SO
AWAY, THE EPISCORE CENTRE
TO MAKE THE ECONOMICS OF THE ADVANCEMENT WORK WE INTEND
TO CONSTRUCT A ROBOTIC PARKADE
ACCESSED OFF THE BACK LANE.IT CAN BE

SMALL, NONOBTRUSIVE
THE HERITAGE STRUCTURES AND ENABLE
THE HERITAGE BUILDINGS TO BE PRESERVED WHILE STILL OFFERING
WHAT WE HOPE IS AN AMENITY FOR
THE NEIGHBOURHOOD. THAT IN A NUTSHELL IS THE
> > THAT ASSISTS A LITTLE. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANKS
QUITE, ALDERMAN FARRELL. ALDERMAN COLLEY-URQUHART FOR
Mr. RICHARDSON?
>> > > ALL RIGHT.
ANYONE ELSE FOR MR.RICHARDSON? THANKS FOR BEING RIGHT HERE THESE DAYS, SIR.
>>> > > > ANY INDIVIDUAL ELSE LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOUR OF THIS APPLICATION? ANYONE ELSE SPEAK IN FAVOUR? ANY INDIVIDUAL LIKE TO SPEAK IN RESISTANCE TO THIS PROPOSAL? ANY PERSON RESISTANCE? ALL RIGHT, AFTER THAT. ALDERMAN FARRELL. >> > > MANY THANKS. I WOULD LOVE TO MOVE TO RECOMMENDATIONS OF CPC ON 3 ANALYSES.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANKS AS WELL AS ALDERMAN MAR HAS SECONDED THAT ACTIVITY. ANY FURTHER CONVERSATION OR INQUIRIES FOR MANAGEMENT? ALL RIGHT, AFTER THAT. ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? LUGGED. READING OF THE LAW ARE WE AGREED? SECOND READING OF THE LAW ARE WE AGREED? PERMISSION FOR THIRD READING OF THE LAW ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? CARRIED. THIRD READING OF THE BYLAW ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? LUGGED. THANK YOU.THAT TAKES US TO PERSONALITY OF PUBLIC GET, ITEM 9.1
IN YOUR PROGRAM, CPC-20110-37.
RESERVE IN THE AREAS OF COUGAR RIDGE, Mr. COPE.
> > THANKS, YOUR PRAISE. THE LOCATION INFLUENCED– THE RESERVE IS LOCATED IN COUGAR RIDGE. THE AREA DETAILED IN RED. JUST SOUTH OF THE C.O.P. RESIDENTIAL GROWTH WHICH IS ONGOING. THE PROPOSITION WILL TAKE THE EXISTING STRIP OF GET
LAND AS WELL AS REMOVE THE M.R. CLASSIFICATION
ALLOWING FOR AN BOOST IN DIMENSION OF THE SURROUNDING STORMWATER RETENTION POND.WE HAVE AN AERIAL PICTURE PROVING THE EXISTING POND AS WELL AS THE STRETCH OF GREENSPACE AS IT NOW EXISTS AND THE ADDITIONAL IMAGE THAT WE HAVE SHOWING THE LAND FROM 85th STREET, THE CURRENT CONDITION OF THE POND AND THE LAND TO WHICH THE FISH POND IS GOING TO BE EXTENDED INTO.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THAT ' S. ALDERMAN POOTMANS? > >
THANK YOU, YOUR WORSHIPPRAYER
I ' VE DISCUSSED THIS WITH THE AREA ASSOCIATION, OTHERS IN. THE LOCATION, THEY ' RE
WELL AWARE OF. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: WE.
NEED TO HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING. > > WE ' RE HAVING A FULL PUBLIC–. GEEZ, SORRY. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: ALMOST.
>> ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOUR. OF THIS PROPOSAL? > > EXCELLENT MID-DAY, YOUR WORSHIP. MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.
RICHARD CLERGYMAN>>. CHIEF OPERATING POLICEMAN WITH. PEAK. NOT REALLY GOING TO MAKE A PRESENTATION. I ASSUME IT >> WAS WELL DISCOVERED. CANISTER, THANK YOU SIGNIFICANTLY. JUST INTENDED TO SAY THANK YOU.
QUITE TO MANAGEMENT FOR. THE VERY PROMPT PROCEDURES THAT
THEY UNDERTOOK FOR United States TO.
APPROVAL PHASES AND OBTAIN US TO THE POINT IN WHICH WE ' RE AT NOW AND I. WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
THAT YOU WERE GIVING THANKS TO United States

FOR.
>> THE EXPEDITIOUS PROCESS WHICH WE DON ' T ALWAYS HEAR AT THESE. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
NY QUESTIONS FOR
Mr. PRIEST? ALDERMAN POOTMANS? > > CONSIDERING Mr. PRIEST YOU MADE THE TRIP DOWN I WOULD JUST.
> > THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE POND. HAS BEEN COMPLETED, ACTUALLY. > > ALREADY COMPLETED.
> > THE LINING IS IN, EVERYTHING.
>> IS IN. > > I THOUGHT THERE WAS
EVEN MORE FUNCTION. TO BE DONE ON THE NORTH SIDE. >> > NOW IT ' S SIMPLY THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN.
> > I ' M GLAD I ASKED THE. CONCERN.
> > ALL THE PIPES REMAIN IN
>>. THE LINING REMAINS IN AND WHATEVER. AS WELL AS ACTUALLY STAGE 1 IS BUILT.
WHAT YOU TIN SEE

>> UP THERE, R1,. R1, R1N, THAT ' S ALL CREATED. WE ' RE JUST WAITING FOR PROBLEMS TO PUT THE SIDEWALK
. DOWN AND THE LANDSCAPING AROUND.
> > THANK YOU EXTREMELY MUCH. > > AND ALSO THEN THE NEXT STEP IS.
THANK YOU REALLY MUCH BEING RIGHT HERE. > > THANK YOU. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: ANYBODY.
> > SO RELOCATED. I MOVE THAT WE WAGED THIS. REFERRAL.
>

>> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: MANY THANKS. AND ALSO ALDERMAN CHABOT IS SECOND. >> THERE ' S NO BYLAW. > > NO BYLAW, OKAY. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: SO >> ANY.
>> CONVERSATION ON THIS, FOLKS?
ALL RIGHT, THEN. ON THE SUGGESTIONS ARE WE.
AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? ALDERMAN HODGES IS OPPOSED. LUGGED. THANK YOU. THAT TAKES US TO THE END OF OUR.
PUBLIC HEARING. WE'' LL PLAY SOME MUSICAL CHAIRS.
RIGHT HERE AND ALSO RELOCATE TO THE REGULAR.
PART OF OUR CONFERENCE. FOR THE INTERESTS OF THE MEMBERS.
OF THE GALLERY, THE REMAINDER OF THE.
PUBLIC HEARING IS– THE REMAINDER OF OUR COUNCIL CONFERENCE IS.
OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLICS AND ALSO YOU'' RE. WELCOME TO STAY BUT THERE WILL CERTAINLY NOT BE AN OPPORTUNITY.
FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO MAKE.
SUBMISSIONS. THE ITEMS IN THE REMAINDER OF THIS.
HAVE LARGELY– THOSE THAT.
REQUIRED PUBLIC HEARINGS HAVE AEADY HAD THAT OCCUR AT THE.
WHICH IS AMENDMENT TO COUNCIL'' S CIVIC DEMOGRAPHICS PLAN. TO OBTAIN IT ON THE FLOOR.THANKS, ALDERMAN LOWE. WE'' LL LET EVERYBODY ELSE FLIP TO.
> > YES. THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER. YES IT IS EXCEPT FOR ONE SMALL.
PRODUCT. WHAT'' S THE INQUIRY THAT TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT WANTS.
IN THE CENTS? CENSUS. WHAT ARE WE QUIZZING THE PUBLIC.
ON?
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: JM LOGAN IS NOT QUITE HERE YET. CONTAINER I DELAY THAT CONCERN. WE'' LL GET TO ANOTHER PAIR PEOPLE ON THE CHECKLIST AS WELL AS WE'' LL. BRING IT BACK. I PUT ON ' T SEE'HIM UPCOMING. > > THAT ' S THE ONLY INQUIRY. > > YOUR PRAYER, Ms. SEEDER IS.
RIGHT HERE. >> > > YOUR PRAISE, THE INQUIRY.
THAT WE'' RE GOING TO BE ASKING.
THE RESIDENTS IS THE TRIANNUAL CONCERN. IT WILL CERTAINLY BE BEGINNING THIS YEAR. AND OUR INQUIRY ACTUALLY IS WHAT SETTING OF TRANSPORTATION DID.
YOU TAKE TO THE LAST DAY YOU.
WORKED.AND THE CHOICE IS BASICALLY. BY BIKE, BY STROLLING, BY.
VARIOUS SETTINGS IN OUR LEGEND. >> > > AND ALSO IF THE PRIVATE IS NOT.
WORKING, EITHER AS A VOLUNTEER.
OR IN TERMS OF PAID WORK, THEN WHAT?
>> > > AFTER THAT THAT REMAINS SPACE.
>> > > NO REACTION >>. > > NO RESPONSE. >> OK. > > THANKS. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi>: THANKS. SIGNIFICANTLY. ALDERMAN LOWE? > > THANKS, YOUR WORSHIP. AND ON THE EXACT SAME CONCERN, I HAD. An INQUIRY ON THE INQUIRY. IT CLAIMS YOU ' RE ONLY
OFFERING. THAT CONCERN TO ONE INDIVIDUAL. IN THE FAMILY, WHY? > > IT ' S SIMPLY A RANDOM SURVEY. I CAN ' T RESPONSE

TO THE. TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS.I THINK THAT WOULD BE BEST. ADDRESSED BY SOMEBODY FROM.
TRANSPORTATION AND ALSO PLANNING. >> > > SIMPLY STRUCK ME AS ODD TO–.
LOTS HOUSES NOWADAYS HAVE 2.
PEOPLE– >> > >. IT ' S A RANDOM RESPONSE THAT THEY. WANT TO OBTAIN A WONDERFUL MIX-UP BUT AGAIN YOU WOULD NEED TO GET.
SOMEONE FROM TRANSPORT AS WELL AS.
INTENDING TO RESPONSE TO THAT. >> > > OK. MY SECONDLY QUESTION HAD TO PERFORM.
WITH THE COLLEGE BOARD INFORMATION AND, YOU RECOGNIZE, I.
UNDERSTAND THERE'' S An EXPENSE. SHARING ARRANGEMENT IN BETWEEN CBE AND ALSO THE CATHOLIC BOARD BUT DO WE.
HAVE OTHER BOARDS IN THE CITY OR.
OPERATING IN THE CITY NOW, DO WE PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THEM AS WELL AS.
EXISTS ANY CHANGE IN
. RESOURCES >>? > > YOUR WORSHIP, NO. THE CONTRACT IS SIMPLY WITH THE.
TWO BOARDS THAT YOU HAVE ACTUALLY DISCUSSED.
>> > > WHAT ABOUT THE FRENCH BOARD,.
WHAT ABOUT THE CHARTER SCHOOLS AND SO ON?
>> > > I DO NOT THINK THAT THEY. HAVE BEEN IN CALL WITH BARB CLIFFORD, THAT I COULD TAKE THIS.
INQUIRY BACK TO. > > YEAH, I WOULD BE CURIOUS.
INCREASING POPULACE PRIVATE SCHOOLS IN THE CITY. WHICH–.
>> > > THE QUESTION ON THE DEMOGRAPHICS IS BASICALLY OFFER– THE INQUIRY.
WE ASK IS UNRELATED TO TAX.
DOLLARS. IT'' S SIMPLY AN VIEWPOINT TO SEE.
WHAT THE DEMOGRAPHICS ARE. SO THERE ARE SELECTIONS OF OTHER. OTHER BEING HOME-SCHOOLING OR.
WITH VARIOUS OTHER MEANS. >> > > O.K.. YES, I WOULD THINK THAT IT.
WOULD BE THE OTHER THAT I WOULD BE INTERESTED IN, WHAT PERCENT.
OF OUR POPULACE IS NOT USING.
THE CATHOLIC BOARD OR THE GENERAL PUBLIC BOARD AND, YOU KNOW, WHERE ELSE.
ARE THEY GOING BELOW AND WHAT'' S. YOUR PRAISE.
THANK YOU. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:. MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN LOWE.
DID YOU INTENDED TO ASK YOUR QUESTION ONCE AGAIN CURRENTLY THAT. MR. LOGAN IS RIGHT HERE
? > > I WILL.
Mr. LOGAN, IN THE. TRANSPORT QUESTIONS BEING.
ASKED, OF ONE INDIVIDUAL IN YOUR HOME, WHAT WAS YOUR LAST MODE. OF– WHEN YOU MOSTED LIKELY TO FUNCTION, MY. CONCERN IS BY JUST ONE INDIVIDUAL IN THE HOUSEHOLD. GIVEN THAT MANY, MANY HOUSEHOLDS. HAVE GREATER THAN SOMEONE USED OR DOING VOLUNTEER. FUNCTION. > > YOUR PRAISE, TO BE HONEST BUT, I'' M NOT PRECISELY CERTAIN BUT. YOU ARE CORRECT, IT SPECIFIES.
TO WHOMEVER THE INDIVIDUAL IS THAT HAS THE FOLLOWING BIRTHDAY IS WHAT.
I'' M RECOMMENDED. IF THERE'' S MORE THAN A SINGLE PERSON IN THE HOME THAT ' S WORKING. I WAS SIMPLY INSPECTING GUIDELINE.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THIAZOL DOES MAKE SENSE. I SEEM LIKE I'' VE BEEN LECTURING.
INDIVIDUALS A GREAT DEAL ON STATISTICS THIS WEEK.

>> > > FEEL FREE, YOUR PRAYER,.
SINCE THAT WAS ONE SUBJECT I.
NEVER DID WELL IN. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: WHAT.
Mr. LOGAN IS SAYING IS IT'' S A. PURELY RANDOM EXAMPLE SO THEY ONLY NEED A RANDOM INDIVIDUAL. THEY DON'' T WISH TO KNOW THE. DUE TO THE FACT THAT THAT WOULD SKEW THE EXAMPLE IF THEY ALL YOU, whole HOUSEHOLD.
WOULD CARPOOL SO THEY'' RE PICKING.
A RANDOM PERSON IN YOUR HOME BY THE BIRTHDAY SO WE GET A FULLY.
RANDOMIZED EXAMPLE IN THE CITY.
>> > > I CAN UNDERSTAND THAT PART. I WOULD HAVE BEEN EVEN MORE.
THINKING ABOUT THE QUANTUMS.
SINCE THAT'' S GOING AHEAD BACK AS WELL AS WHACK United States IN THE HEAD. THANKS, YOUR WORSHIP.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: ALDERMAN CHABOT.
>> > > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER. LOWE AS WELL AS CHABOT, IT ' S A COMMON THEME. THANK YOU. I HAD THE EXACT SAME INQUIRY FOR Mr.LOGAN AS WELL AS

THANK YOU FOR.
THAT RESPONSE. DIDN'' T NECESSARILY LIKE IT BUT … Ms. CEDAR, THROUGH THIS LAST.
ELECTION ON THE DEMOGRAPHICS THAT WE GOT OR THE VOTERS NOTE THAT WE.
GOT, I DISCOVER THAT THERE WAS A.
NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS AS WELL AS THAN RESIDING IN THE HOME FOR A.
NUMBER OF YEARS. THAT WEREN'' T ON THIS YEAR ' S DEMOGRAPHICS.
AND ALSO I ' M JUST WONDERING, DO WE. EVER
>> CARRY FORWARD THE INFORMATION? > > THE CENSUS AND ALSO THE VOTERS. CHECKLIST, YOUR WORSHIP, ARE 2 VARIOUS PROCEDURES. I CAN SPEAK TO THE CENSUS. I WOULD PREFER TO LEAVE THE POLITICAL ELECTION TO BARBARA CLIFFORD. CENSUS WE DON'' T COLLECT ANY.
PERSONAL INFORMATION. THERE ARE NO NAMES LINKED. THERE ARE UNDOUBTEDLY ADDRESSES AND ALSO.
ADDRESSES TEND TO MODIFICATION. THEREFORE HOMES BEING REMOVED.
AS WELL AS ANOTHER DWELLING GOING IN ITS LOCATION. I DOUBT AS TO YOUR.
> > NO,'I ' M JUST WONDERING WHY. SOME INDIVIDUALS THAT HAD LIVED IN THE RESIDENCE FOR SO MANY YEARS
. > > THE LIST.
TO BARBARA CLIFFORD AND ALSO I COULD.
PASS THAT CONCERN ALONG TO YOU. I'' M HERE TO TALK TO THE CENSUS. TODAY.> > > SPECIFIC TO THE THE DEMOGRAPHICS, O.
NAMES. THANK YOU FOR THAT. DECISION OF SECONDARY.
COLLECTIONS, HOW DO WE GO ABOUT.
MAKING THAT RESOLUTION? >> > > WE DON ' T, YOUR WORSHIP. WE SIMPLY ASK THE CONCERN OF.
HOME SYSTEMS, THE AMOUNT OF INDIVIDUALS RESIDE AT THIS HOME.
>> > > YEAH. JUST WONDERING HOW WE CONTAINER HELP WITH OBTAINING A BETTER,.
MORE CLONS CLEAR ACTION OUT OF.
THAT. IF THERE'' S LIKE 2 MAIL BOXES. THAT ' S NORMALLY RATHER A SIGN.
OF THE REALITY THAT THERE'' S TWO HOMES.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: IT'' S. AN OUTSTANDING QUESTION. ALDERMAN CHABOT? I'' M NOT GOING TO PUT Ms. SLOAN. ON THE PLACE RIGHT AT THE MINUTE BUT IT ' S A LITTLE BIT WEIRD TO ASK.
A PERSON TO DESCRIBE WHETHER. THEY ' RE IN ENGAGING IN ILLEGAL TASK AS PART OF A DEMOGRAPHICS.
MR. LEAGUEN? Mr. LOGAN. > > YOUR PRAISE, WE CAN ASK ALL.
IT ' S OPTIONAL.
>> WHETHER THEY DREAM TO GET INVOLVED OR OTHERWISE. > > MY POINT, YOUR WORSHIP, IS. THAT I BELIEVE THERE ARE MORE SECONDARY SUITES THAN WE ' VE. DETERMINED. AND ALSO I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE PROBABLY SMART TO KNOW ROUGHLY HOW MANY.
WHETHER OR NOT INDIVIDUALS SELECT TO ADMIT THERE'' S A SECOND SUITE. THERE ' S CERTAINLY A NUMBER OF. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: YOU RECOGNIZE I DON ' T DIFFER BUT AND ALSO I. THINK THAT MAYBE YOU CAN SOLUTION.
CENSUS, WHAT'' S THE TIMING ON.
THAT? WOULD WE ACTUALLY DO THAT FOR.
WE ARE NOW EDUCATING AS WE SPEAK. WE ' RE GOING OUT APRIL 1st. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: WE.
COULD PERHAPS CONSIDER THIS FOR A FUTURE DEMOGRAPHICS IF WE WANTED TO.
>> > > THAT COULD BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION IN A.
FUTURE CENSUS, YOUR PRAYER. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU.
>> > > MANY THANKS, YOUR PRAISE. I VALUE THAT RECOMMENDATIONS AND.
IT'' S CERTAINLY SOMETHING THAT.
WE'' LL TAKE UNDER ADVISEMENT. Ms. CEDAR, IF I MAY ASK AS.
WELL, IN REGARDS TO THE.
PORTION OF RESPONSES, I RECOGNIZE MY BETTER HALF HAS DONE THINGS BEFORE.
I ASSUME IT'' S EVEN MORE EVEN MORE
THE. EHUMAN RATIONS ASPECT IN WHICH THERE WAS A VERY SMALL TOLERANCE.
IN REGARDS TO THE NUMBER OF.
HOUSES THAT YOU COULD NOT RECORD DETAILS ON. WHAT'' S YOUR NORMAL REACTION.
NEED FROM YOUR– >> > > YOUR PRAISE, WE ASKED THAT.
1% OF THE ASSIGNED LOCATION BE.
NOT ABLE TO CONTACT.THAT ' S An OBJECTIVE WE STRIVE FOR. WHETHER OR NOT WE CONTAINER ATTAIN.
THAT, IT HINGES ON ENGAGEMENT. THAT IS GENERALLY WHAT WE HOPE.
TO ACHIEVE. >> > > YOUR WORSHIP, AS WELL AS THE REASON.
I ASKED THE PREVIOUS CONCERN TO.
THIS IS SINCE I BELIEVE BOTH ARE SORT OF INEXTREKICALLY.
CONNECTED. I I.E., EXISTS A SECONDARY COLLECTION AND ALSO IS THERE SOMEBODY.
REACTING AT THAT SECONDARY.
SUITE. 1% IS BASED ON REGISTERED.
ADDRESSES, RIGHT?
>> > > YOUR WORSHIP, MAY I ADD TO THAT. INCAPABLE TO GET IN TOUCH WITH IMPLIES EXACTLY.
THAT, THAT THE PERSON WASN'' T THERE AT NUMEROUS ATTEMPTS. THERE'' S NO MEANS WE COULD GET THE.
INFO. IF THE INDIVIDUAL ISN'' T THERE AT. A CERTAIN FACTOR, WE WILL CERTAINLY MOST LIKELY TO
A. NEIGHBOUR AS WELL AS ASK. THAT NEIGHBOR WON'' T KNOW. WHETHER OR NOT
— WHETHER THEY. CHOOSE TO ANSWER CORRECTLY, RIGHT. UNABLE TO CONTACT MEANS THAT.
THERE IS NO INFORMATION.WE ALSO HAVE OTHER CODINGS SUCH. AS NO, THEY DON ' T INTEND TO.
TAKE PART. GET IN TOUCH WITH.
> > RIGHT. >> > > WELL, THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTION.
IF WE COULD IDENTIFY THAT IT WAS A.
SECONDARY SUITE COLLECTION MY POINT, MIGHT BE AN UNABLE TO CALL. ANYWAYS, I GUESS THAT'' S ALL I NEED TO KNOW IN THE MEANTIME.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
FASCINATING EVENING– PLIGHT OF FANCY FOR OUR DISCUSSION TODAY.
BUT IT'' S AN IMPORTANT ONE.
>> > > THE FACT THAT IS CONCERN EXISTS IS AT LEAST A VERY LEGITIMATE.
COLLEAGUE MAKE THOSE ANALYSES.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN CHABOT. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS.
THING? ALDERMAN LOWE, DID YOU DESIRED TO.
SHUT? ALL RIGHT, THEN.ON THE REFERRAL TO TAKE ON. THE MODIFIED CIVIC DEMOGRAPHICS POLICY. ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED
? CARRIED. THANK YOU. 10.1.2 THEN IN YOUR AGENDA,.
REPORT ON THE CITY OF CALGARY'' S. COMMUNICATION FUNCTION. A TIP THAT THROUGHOUT OUR.
SPENDING PLAN DELIBERATIONS WE ASKED.
FOR THIS RECORD. AND BELOW IT IS. SO I'' LL TAKE A MOVEMENT TO OBTAIN.
THANKS, ALDERMAN LOWE. ALDERMAN PINCOTT.
SAY SOMETHING ABOUT THIS RECORD? CONCERNS TO MANAGEMENT OR DISCUSSION?
>> > > I HAVE SOME
>>. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: Mr.STEVENS.

> > WELL, WE HAVE SEEN A FAIR LITTLE BIT.
OF GROWTH IN THIS DIVISION AND IF I'' M READING IT CORRECTLY, IF
. WE EXCLUDE 311 IN STRAIGHT-UP.
COMMUNICATIONS WE'' VE HAD OVER THE YEARS, OH, IF I'' M ANALYSIS.
THIS CORRECTLY, 34 PERSONNEL.
MOVED IN FROM OTHER PUTS GIVEN THAT THE YEAR 2000 AS WELL AS 31 NEW.
TEAM. COULD YOU TALK A BIT TO THOSE 31 NEW PERSONNEL AND ALSO THE KIND.
OF OBLIGATIONS THAT THEY.
ARE DOING THAT MAY BE VARIOUS THAN WHAT WAS THE SITUATION PRIOR TO WE.
STARTED THIS DEPARTMENT IN THE.
> > YES, THANK YOU, YOUR WORSHIP. THAT PERSONNEL WOULD BE INVOLVED IN PROVIDING SERVICES FROM THE.
MAIN FUNCTION TO BUSINESS.
UNITS. THEY WOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED A.
SOLUTION IN THE WHAT I WOULD.
REFER TO AS THE INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS OPERATE WHERE WE.
PROVIDE THE PRINT, MULTIMEDIA.
MANUFACTURING, SOME OF THE GRAPHIC STYLE. THE CREATING AND ALSO MODIFYING, A FEW OF.
THAT ESPECIALLY WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MULTIMEDIA SYSTEM,.
THAT'' S IN WHICH A GREAT DEAL OF THE.
RESOURCES HAVE GONE. >> > > Mr. STEVENS, WHILE YOU'' RE.
UP, THERE HAS BEEN SOME. CONVERSATION AROUND THE COMPANY OF THE POSITIONING OF.
THIS KIND OF AS SOLUTION SYSTEM FOR

. THE REMAINDER OF THE CORPORATION.AND THE REALITY THAT THAT WOULD. SUGGEST THE COMMUNICATIONS.
CHOICES ARE RATHER DECENTRALIZED THAT THEY'' RE MADE.
ACROSS THE FIRM THAT THIS.
SYSTEM DOESN'' T REALLY HAVE ANY CONTROL OVER THE OVERALL.
MESSAGE. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THAT'' S A FAIR STATEMENT AS WELL AS WE'' VE BEEN.
BELIEVING ABOUT HOW TO HANDLE.
THAT ' S A REASONABLE COMMENT. THE COORDINATION OF THE MESSAGE.
IS A HARD POINT WHEN YOU'' VE. I WON'' T DISAGREEMENT THAT.
CERTAIN THINGS, BRANDING, INTERNET,.
SOME OF OUR EXTERNAL EXISTENCE BUT RELATIVE TO MESSAGING.
AROUND CERTAIN JOBS AS WELL AS.
ORGANIZATIONS, THAT IS NOT CONTROLLED CENTRALLY.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU.I MAY HAVE A PAIR MORE AND ALSO.
I'' LL BOOK THE RIGHT TO ASK.
> > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER. AND I'' M NOT CERTAIN THAT TO ASK THIS QUESTION TO.
COMMUNICATIONS PAID BY DIVISION. AS OPPOSED TO 2010 PERMANENT.
Interaction FTEs PAID BY CSC AND ALSO I'' M JUST WONDERING, IS THIS.
LIKE THE OVERALL OUT OF EACH OF.
THE VARIOUS COMPANY SYSTEMS? >> > > YES, IT IS.
>> > > NOW, WE'' RE TALKING ABOUT.
PERSONNEL COMMITTED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS. DOES THAT CONSIST OF CAPITAL.
ELEMENTS TO THAT? >> > > YES>>. > > REALLY?
>> >

> YES.YOU WILL DISCOVER IN SOME OF THEM.
THAT THEY ARE MONEYED OUT OF.
FUNDING. THEY ARE– INVOLVE PROJECTS IN.
AREAS THAT ARE MONEYED OUT.
OF CAPITAL FOR A BRIEF AMOUNT OF TIME. THEY ARE CONSISTED OF. THERE ARE OTHERS THAT ARE BASED AND THEY ARE FUNDED OUT OF.
OPERATING. I TIN REFER TO MY DEPARTMENT. IF YOU LOOK IN BUSINESS.
SERVICES THERE ARE SOME PRIMARILY IN OUR SERVICE UNITS.
THAT ARE ESSENTIALLY FUNDING.
DRIVEN.THEY ARE FUNDED OUT OF RESOURCES. DETAILS REFERRAL, YOUR. PRAYER, ATTACHMENT 5, PAGE 1 YOU CAN SEE BUSINESS SERVICES.
WHERE YOU HAVE SUBSTANTIAL.
AMOUNTS OF CAPITAL IN BUSINESS RESIDENCES AND ALSO BUILDINGS AS WELL AS.
I.T., FOR INSTANCE, SEVERAL OF THAT.
IS REALLY SPECIFIC PROJECT WORK WHERE COMMUNICATIONS ARE.
REQUIRED, FOR EXAMPLE, OUT OF.
VACATING A BUILDING.

> > THAT HELPS A LITTLE. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK. > > THE BUILDING OF THE POND. > > THANK YOU VERY MUCH. > > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAISE.YOU WILL CERTAINLY INTEND TO DO A FULL
INTERACTION STRATEGY TO PERSONNEL
CONCERNING WHAT THE INFLUENCE WOULD BE, THE ACTIVITY, THEY WOULD BE
MONEYED OUT OF CAPITAL.
>> > > O.K.. NOT GOING TO CHOICE ON YOU,
MR. STEVENS, BUT I'' M LOOKING
AT ESPECIALLY UTILITIES AND ENVIRONMENT. AND I SEE A TOTAL BELOW OF ABOUT 12F. T.E.s BUT I HAVE SEEN A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF COMMUNICATIONS AS WELL AS AD, 12-FTEs, THAT COVERS THE CAPITAL PRICE OF ALL THE ADVERTISEMENT THAT GOES OUT ESPECIALLY IN RELATION TO WATER PRESERVATION, ET CETERA, AND SO ON?
>> > > MANY THANKS, YOUR PRAYER. IF I CAN, IF I CAN SIMPLY SPEAK WITH THE ENERGIES ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY INTERACTION RESOURCES, AND ALSO IF YOU SEE THE BUILD-UP OF RESOURCES CONSIDERING THAT 2000, IN BETWEEN 2000-2010, YOU RECOGNIZE THE BULK OF THAT RISE HAS BEEN REALLY GEARED TO THE TRUTH THAT A HUGE COMPONENT OF OUR ENVIRONMENTAL SUCCESS IN TERMS OF SUPPLYING PROGRAMS AS WELL AS REDUCING AND RAISING DIVERSION, INCREASING WATER PRESERVATION, ALL THOSE KINDS OF PROGRAMS, CREATING PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING ABOUT HOW THE STORMWATER DECREASES THE DRAINPIPE AND ALSO ALL THE RESPONSIBLE, YOU KNOW, HAIRS THAT ENTER INTO WATER SOURCE ADMINISTRATION; THAT'' S WHY WE ' VE GOT THOSE RESOURCES AND THEY ASSISTANCE US CREATE THE MESSAGE AS WELL AS THE INFORMATION
THAT WE PUT OUT IN OUR VARIOUS EXPENSE INSERTS OR ON TV OR RADIO, WHENEVER. THEY'' RE HELPING US CRAFT THOSE MESSAGES AND ALSO IF WE DIDN'' T HAVE THOSE PEOPLE, WE WOULD STILL HAVE TO BE DOING THAT.AND OUR SIGHT IS

THAT THE INDIVIDUALS TO GIVE THOSE MESSAGES ARE THE EXPERT COMMUNICATORS THAT ARE EDUCATED TO DO THAT AND THEY TAKE THE
BROADER NEIGHBORHOOD. > > NO. OPERATIONAL MESSAGING AS WELL AS IN REGARDS TO Mr.STEVENS '.
COMMENTS CONCERNING THE CONSISTENCY.

OF MESSAGING AS WELL AS THE CORPORATE MESSAGING, THERE ' S SOME. MESSAGING THAT WE NEED TO PUT. OUT VERY, VERY QUICKLY THAT IS EXTREMELY, REALLY ONE-OF-A-KIND TO OUR. BUSINESS THEREFORE–.
> > THAT ' S WHY YOU>> ARE THOSE INTERNAL PEOPLE PARTICULARLY. COMMITTED TO THE COMMUNICATION. TECHNIQUE. MY INQUIRY THEN
IS, IS THIS. FULLY BIRTHED BELOW WITH REGARDS TO.
THE EXPENSES FOR COMMUNICATIONS WITHIN YOUR DEPARTMENT? > > YES. > > DOES THAT CONSIST OF THE EXPENSES FOR PROMOTION, THE
>> COST FOR. THE ARTWORK, THE COST FOR THE.
THIS IS THE PEOPLE, THE FTEs THAT WE HAVE THAT WE NEED TO DO. COMMUNICATIONS TEAM AND CREATIVE SOLUTIONS AND THOSE. KINDS OF PEOPLE.
AND ALSO THE EXPENSES OF THAT FUNCTION TURNS UP SOMEWHERE ELSE IN THE REPORT. > > Mr. STEVENS IS TELLING ME.
>> ADD-ON 6.
SO I ASSUME THAT EACH OF THESE.
ADD-ONS HAS A VARIOUS.
PURPOSE. I THINK ATTACHMENT 5 IS.
PARTICULARLY INTENDED TO.
HIGHLIGHT IN WHICH THE DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS HAVE RESOURCES.
EMBEDDED IN THEIR BUSINESS THAT.
THEY REQUIREMENT IN ORDER TO DO THEIR SERVICE. THAT IS PAID FOR BY THE.
BUSINESS.JUST THE OPERATIONAL PART. > > YEAH, WELL, I ' M NOT
>> SURE IF. I'' M MAKING CLEAR BELOW REGARDING WHAT I'' M TRYING TO ACCESS. LOOKED LIKE I'' M NOT BUT I ' M. TRYING TO IDENTIFY, YOUR PRAYER, RESPECTFULLY, WHAT OUR.
OVERALL COMMUNICATIONS COSTS ARE.'THERE APPEARS TO BE SOME PRICES THAT AREN ' T MIRRORED IN THESE. NUMBERS FROM MY POINT OF VIEW AS WELL AS. I RECOGNIZE THAT WE HAVE A COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION. THAT IS DEDICATED TO. WORKING WITH THE CITY ' S MESSAGING BUT I SOMEHOW OBTAIN THE.
FEELING THAT THERE ' S SOME. ADDITIONAL EXPENSES WITHIN INDIVIDUAL ORGANIZATION UNITS THAT. ARE DEDICATED TOWARDS.
COMMUNICATIONCOMMUNICATIONS THAT NECESSARILY FLESHED OUT IN THIS.
RECORD.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: Mr Mr.CHABOT.

> > YOUR PRAYER, THE INFORMATION.
IS PRESENTED IN TWO DIFFERENT ITEMS ONE OF WHICH IS AN FTE.
COUNT WHICH IS PROBABLY THE MOST.
VALUABLE METHODS TO SEE THE GROWTH OF THE FTEs ON THE.
DISTRIBUTION OVER A DURATION OF.
TIME. ON ADD-ON 6 IS A CHECKLIST OF.
EXPENDITURES ON COMMUNICATIONS.
BY DIVISION BY UNIT AND YOU THE AMOUNT IS.
$ 12 MILLION. THAT'' S EXCLUSIVE OF SALARIES AND ALSO WAGES OF THOSE PEOPLE THAT ARE.
COMMITTED TO THAT FULL-TIME.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: SO THIS IS CREATIVE FUNCTION,.
MARKETING GETS, THAT SORT OF.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THAT ' S. VERY HELPFUL. > > A LITTLE. YOU'' RE PHRASE THAT 12.6 IS IN ENHANCEMENT TO THE OTHER TOTAL THAT.
I HAD FOR COMMUNICATIONS?
>> >'> I ' M NOT TOO SURE WHICH OTHER OVERALL YOU HAD. IT ' S ASIDE FROM INCOMES AND ALSO. INCOMES FOR THE Permanent FTEs.
>> > > WHAT ' S THE TOTAL PRICE FOR. COMMUNICATIONS?
>> 18 MILLION? > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: IN WHICH >>. IS THAT? > > I HAVE THE NUMBER BELOW. PREVIOUSLY. I SIMPLY DIDN ' T MARK IT UP WELL SUFFICIENT, I PRESUME.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: WHILE.
YOU'' RE SEARCHING FOR THAT, I CAN SUGGEST THAT … I WAS GOING TO SUGGEST … IF I'' M READING CORRECTLY, THEN WE HAVE 84.6 FTEs IN, 65 IN.
COMMUNICATIONS, ANOTHER.
57-FTEs EMBEDDED IN DEPARTMENTS AS WELL AS WE SPEND.
$ 12 MILLION A YEAR ON CREATIVE.
SOLUTIONS.

>> > > An OVERALL OF 149.6 FTEs I.
GATHER.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THAT INCLUDES 311 AND ALSO ANOTHER PERSON 57 IN.
DEPARTMENTS.
>> > > AT VARYING FEES. > >> Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
THEY'' RE NOT JUST THE SAME AS WELL AS–. >'> AS WELL AS THAT ' S WHAT I ' M TRYING TO LOCATE OUT, YOUR WORSHIP IS WHAT.
>> IS THE OVERALL. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: DO WE HAVE THAT NUMBER IN HERE. INCLUDING ADVANTAGES and also earnings,
. Mr. CHABOT? > >> THIS REPORT DOES NOT CONTAIN. IT ATTEMPTS TO PROGRAM COUNCIL 2.
POINTS, THE DEVELOPMENT OF FTEs Gradually AND WHAT'' S RELEVANT IS. HOW MUCH ARE WE SPENDING ON.
NUMBER AND ALSO IT ' S NOT HERE. THERE'' S A BUNCH OF DETAILS. MUCH WE ' VE IMPROVED EFFICIENCY WITHIN THIS DIVISION AND I. HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THAT.
AS WELL AS OVERALL GROSS. AGREED. MAYBE I'' LL FIND OUT EVEN MORE WHEN I LISTEN. THANK YOU.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I AGREE WITH YOU, ALD CHABOT, THAT.
THE COMPLETE EXPENSES WOULD BE AN.
EXTREMELY HANDY NUMBER BELOW AS WELL AS WE OUGHT NOT TO NEED TO GO.
FISHING FOR IT. I DO HAVE ANOTHER PERSON LOCATION FOR YOU TO APPEARANCE, THOUGH, ON WEB PAGE 12 OF.
14 YOU WILL SEE THE BUDGET OF.
THAT DEPARTMENT, Mr.STEVENS MAYBE YOU CANISTER TALK TO THIS, THE. SPENDING PLAN FOR THAT DIVISION IS. 515.50– 15.506 MILLION.
CURRENTLY, Mr. STEVENS, I'' M ASSUMING.
THAT THAT NUMBER CONSISTS OF THE.
INCOMES AND ADVANTAGES WITHIN THE DIVISION. MAYBE NOT THE FULL 12 MILLION.
IN CREATIVE BECAUSE THAT OBTAINS CREDITED THE DEPARTMENTS.
>> > > YOUR PRAYER, WE ' RE CONSTRICTING.
IT DOWN. I CAN OBTAIN THAT NUMBER. WE DON'' T NEED TO SEARCH FOR IT.
YOU'' RE RIGHT, WHAT THE OUTSTANDING NUMBER AND ALSO YOU'' VE. CHARACTERIZED IT EXACTLY.
CORRECT, YOUR PRAISE. THERE ARE 149.6 FTEs WITHIN.
COMMUNICATIONS AS WELL AS THE COST OF.
THAT IS COLLECTION OUT ON ADD-ON 4, THE PAGE 3 OF 3.
PLUS THE COST THAT'' S IN ACCESSORY 6, THE PRICE THAT I.
DON'' T HAVE FOR YOU IS THE COSTEXPENSE > > Mayor Naheed'Nenshi: I ASSUME FROM ALDERMAN CHABOT ' S. LINE OF QUESTIONING WHICH I ECHO. ONE OF THE DIFFICULTIES IN HERE IN ONE OF THE FACTORS– WELL, I. WAS GOING TO SAY I ASKED FOR,.
UNDERSTAND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THAT. BIG NUMBER OVER TIME BECAUSE IT IS CHALLENGING WHEN WE ' RE
. LOOKING AT SPENDING PLAN TO BE ABLE TO.
REALLY FOLLOW UP SPECIFIC DEPARTMENT. IT'' S AMONG THE EVEN MORE DIFFICULT.
ONES, THIS SET IN I.T.SO IT WOULD BE USEFUL FOR United States TO BE.
ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THAT.
>> > > YOUR WORSHIP, I RECOGNIZE ALDERMAN CHABOT'' S CONCERN TO BE. ABOUT COMMUNICATIONS. OBVIOUSLY THAT INCLUDES THE 311 NUMBER. DO YOU WANT THE OVERALL NUMBER.
WHICH I TIN OBTAIN. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I.
WOULD LIKE IT BUT ALSO WITH 311.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK YOU. > > THANK YOU REALLY MUCH, YOUR WORSHIP. THAT ' S EXACTLY THE CONCERN I. HAD OUTSTANDING ON IT AND ALSO OTHER THAN THAT UNLESS THERE'' S OTHER.
THE CHRONOLOGY OR THE.
DEVELOPMENT OF IT AND ALSO IT APPEARS TO ME YOUR PRAYER WHENEVER.
THIS GROUP OF PEOPLE WON AN.
AWARD THEY CUT THEIR BUDGET. MEANT OUT THERE. I POINTED OUT THAT TO AMONG THE.
MEDIA INDIVIDUALS. HE STATES THAT KIND OF SOUNDS LIKE.
JOURNALISM. THERE WE ARE. THANK YOU.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
ALDERMAN FARRELL– OH, YOU TURNED YOUR LIGHT OFF. YOU'' RE GOOD.
Mr.STEVENS IS GOING

TO TAKE ON THAT MEMO WE ' RE ASKING FOR WITH. ALDERMAN LOWE, DID YOU WANT TO CLOSE?
REFERRALS, OBTAIN THE RECORD TO INFO, AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? LUGGED. ALL. THAT THEN TAKES US TO THE SPC ON.
MONEY IN COMPANY SOLUTIONS, PRODUCT 10.2.1 IN YOUR SCHEDULE,.
ALDERMAN LOWE.
>> > > STEP THE RECOMMENDATIONS AS WELL AS THE THREE READINGS OF THE.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK YOU. > > NO', IT'' S REQUIREMENT.
IT ' S THE BUILDING TAX OBLIGATION, TAX OBLIGATION. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:
. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: ANY.
OPPOSED? BROUGHT. FIRST ANALYSIS OF LAW 11M-2011.
AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? SECOND ANALYSIS OF THE LAW ARE.
WE AGREED? CONSENT FOR 3RD ANALYSIS OF THE LAW ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? BROUGHT. THIRD ANALYSIS OF THE LAW ARE.
WE AGREED? ON BYLAW 12M-2011, FIRST READING.
OF THE BYLAW ARE WE AGREED? 2ND READING OF THE BYLAW ARE.
WE AGREED? AUTHORIZATION FOR 3RD READING OF THE LAW? AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? 3RD READING OF THE BYLAW ARE.
WE AGREED? > > YES, YOUR WORSHIP. I'' D BE PLEASED TO RELOCATE ALL THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE LPT WITH.
THE EXEMPT OF LPT-2011-11. AS YOU UNDERSTAND THERE WAS NO RECOMMENDATION BY COMMITTEE.
I DO HAVE AN ALTERNATE.
REFERRAL THAT I WOULD LIKE TO RELOCATE ON THAT PARTICULAR THING. AS WELL AS PLEASED TO OPEN AND CLOSE ON.
ANY AND ALSO ALL IF REQUIREMENT BE.

>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU. DO YOU WISH TO OPEN ON THE MARLBOROUGH ONE?
>> > > WELL, VERY BRIEFLY LOOKING.
AND IDENTIFYING VEHICLE PARKING AREA, THIS SET HAS BEEN AN ISSUE FOR.
SOME TIME EVEN BEFORE WE.
INTRODUCED PARK AS WELL AS RIDE. IT HAS ACTUALLY DEVELOPED SOME DIFFICULTIES.
FOR THE ADJACENT AREA. NOT ONLY THAT BUT IN ADDITION TO THE REALITY THAT AT ONE POINT THE.
NEARBY APARTMENT BUILDING WAS.
CHARGING FOR THEIR CAR PARK AND ALSO SOME OF THE CITIZENS REJECTED TO.
PAY IT AND ALSO WOUND UP VEHICLE PARKING ON.
THE STREET WHICH FURTHER EXACERBATED THE ENTIRE CONCERN. THE LOCALS HAVE BEEN SETTING.
UP WITH IT FOR SOME TIME. THIS IS AN POSSIBILITY FOR THEM.
TO REQUEST THE REMAINDER OF THE.
STREET TO GIVE ON-STREET AUTO PARKING DEMANDS.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: AND ALSO I.
DO HAVE An INQUIRY BUT I'' LL TAKE A SECONDER FOR ALL OF THESE WITH.
THE EXEMPTION OF THE SECONDARY.
MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN HODGES. WE'' VE GOT THAT.
THIS IS THE ROAD, I HAVE A.
SPECIAL– THE ROAD I MATURED ON, I HAVE A SPECIAL RATE OF INTEREST IN.
THIS ONE SPECIFIC, IS THIS.
PARK-AND-RIDE DRIVEN. DO WE HAVE A FEELING OF IF WE'' RE. DOING THIS ON APRIL 1st THE.
PROBLEM WILL GO AWAY? >> > > YOUR PRAYER, I WOULDN ' T SAY.
IT'' S TOTALLY PARK-AND-RIDE.
DRIVEN.THERE IS ONE TERMINAL WE HAVE. OPENINGS IN THAT WHOLE LOT.
THERE ' S A NUMBER
OF COMMERCIAL. DEVELOPMENTS AND ALDERMAN CHABOT.
JUST MENTIONED THERE ARE MULTIFAMILIES THAT ARE RESULTING. IN A GREAT DEAL OF AUTOS GETTING ON THE.
GIVEN WHAT YOU JUST SAID, JUST. PARKING PASSES DO YOU GET IF YOU.
HAVE A RESIDENCE? > > TWO.
> > YEAH. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi
>>: 2.
>> > > YEAH. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: TWO ON>>.
>> THE STREET. > > YEAH.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: AND ALSO I.
>> KNOW MOST THE MAJORITY OF THESE HOMES DO HAVE
BACK LANES AND GARAGES. > > YES. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THE OTHER
>> CONCERN I> HAD, THIS. STRIKES ME AS QUITE A BIG ZONE.
ALONG MERIVALE DRIVE, THE STREET I MATURED ON, IT GOES ALMOST. FROM 36 ROAD TO 32ers.
STREET.DO WE DO THEM THIS LARGE? IT ' S QUITE

A DISTANCE FROM THE. HUB OF ACTIVITY AS WELL AS THE C TRAIN.
> > TYPICALLY, YOUR PRAISE, IF. >> IT BELONGED TO A DETAILS USE
. IT WOULD BE A SMALLER ZONE.
OUR EXPERIENCE HAS BEEN THAT THE. PARKING AND WALKING DROPS OFF.
THANK YOU. ONE? ALDERMAN CHABOT DID YOU DESIRED
TO CLOSE.
BOUNDED NORTH BY MARL FINANCIAL INSTITUTION DRIVE TO 36th Road AND ALSO EAST TO THE.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I WAS LOOKING AT THE MAP. HERE.WHEN YOU OBTAIN DOWN TO MERIVALE.
DRIVE IT COPULATES TO.
50th road. IT'' S RATHER MUCH. > >> IT ONLY DROPS TO.
MERIVALE. IT'' S REALLY NOT A LONG BLOCK.
THERE. IT'' S AROUND THAT ENTIRE MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.
AND IT'' S PREDOMINANTLY WHAT'' S. DRIVE ON THE ISSUES THAT CONNECT TO AUTO PARKING DEFICIENCIES THAT.
EXIST ON THE ROAD.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: MANY THANKS REALLY MUCH. I JUST SAW THE MAP. I DIDN'' T NEED TO GOOGLE MAP IT. THANK YOU. THE HOUSE I GREW UP IN.
IS JUST BEYOND THE ZONE SO ALL THE AUTO PARKING WOULD GO THERE.
BUT I DON'' T LIVE THERE ANY LONGER.
SO IT'' S ALL RIGHT. I WILL CERTAINLY CONSIDER THIS CONDITION. ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS–.
ANY OPPOSED. ALDERMAN PINCOTT IS OPPOSED.
THANK YOU ALDERMAN AND AFTERWARDS.
THREE ANALYSES OF THE PROPOSED LAW, 13-M-2011, CONCURRED? SECOND READING, ANY OPPOSED? LEVIES UPDATE, ALDERMAN CHABOT,.
> > WELL, BRIEFLY, YOUR >> WORSHIP,.
WE'' VE ESTABLISHED LEVIES BASED.
ON FRONTAGE AS WELL AS I BELIEVE THE PROPOSITION IS RATHER.
SIMPLE. MONIES THAT HAVE BEEN COLLECTED WITH THE OBJECTIVE OF BEING.
USED EVENTUALLY TIME WHEN.
THEY'' RE REQUIRED FOR THE PLANNED OBJECTIVE. VARIOUS OTHER THAN THAT, NOT MUCH EVEN MORE.
TO SAY. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN CHABOT. ANY DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? REALLY WELL, AFTER THAT, ON THE.
REFERRALS ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? LUGGED.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THERE IT IS. LAW 18-M-2011, FIRST READING OF THE LAW AGREED? SECOND ANALYSIS OF THE LAW.
AGREED IN CONSENT FOR THIRD READING OF THE LAW ARE.
WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED.THIRD READING OF THE

BYLAW. AGREED? ANY OPPOSED.
CARRIED. THANKS.
10.3.3 AFTER THAT, AREA FARE FOR TAXIS AND ALSO LIMOS, ALDERMAN CHABOT.
>> > > YES, YOUR PRAISE. SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS TO AREA BASED PRICES FOR TAXI AND.
LIMOUSINE HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED.
BY T-LACK BOARD AS WELL AS THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION ON THIS PROBLEM IN.
COMMITTEE. THERE ARE SOME AMENDMENTS THAT I WOULD ASK SOMEBODY TO PUT ON MY.
PART AS WELL AS IT'' S ESPECIALLY
IN. REGARDS TO THE DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION, NATURALLY THE.
DAY OF IMPLEMENTATION SHOULD.
MIRROR THE DATE OF THE CLOSURE OF BARLOW AS WELL AS I DON'' T BELIEVE.
THAT ' S >> SHOWED PROPERLY IN.
THE LAW. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:. > > COMES INTO FORCE THE DAY IT ' S PASSED AND THAT OUGHT TO REALLY.
STATE THIS BYLAW COMES INTO >> COMPEL. ON APRIL 3rd. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: SURE.
THANKS, ALDERMAN STEVENSON. THANKS, ALDERMAN POOTMANS, ON. ANY OPPOSED?
SUGGESTED. ALD– ALDERMAN CHABOT. >> > > RESPECTFULLY, YOUR PRAYER, I.
BELIEVE THE CHANGE ON THE.
BYLAW HAS TO BE AT SECOND READING.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: MY.
WE'' LL DO THAT IN A FEW MINUTES. QUESTION TO I THINK IT'' S. OH, IT ' S
Mr. WATSON.
THAT WOULD BE MOST IMPACTED BY.
THAT CLOSURE. BUT I OBSERVE THAT FOR FACTORS I.
COULDN'' T QUITE DETERMINE, SOME.
OF THEM WENT UP AS WELL AS SEVERAL OF THEM WENT DOWN. CONTAINER YOU TALK TO THAT?
>> > > TO THE CHAIR, YES, I CAN, YOUR PRAISE. THE PRICES WERE INITIALLY COLLECTION A.
NUMBER OF YEARS AGO BUT THIS TIME WE RETURNED AND ACTUALLY.
DROVE THEM SEVERAL TIMES BOTH IN.
THRILL HR, NON-RUSH HOUR. FOUND OUT HONESTLY THAT THE.
PREVIOUS PRICES WERE NOT EVERYTHING.
ACCURATE.THIS IS A MUCH EVEN MORE ACCURATE. > >'IT ' S A BIT OF A CLEAN-UP AS. WELL AS ALDERMAN CHABOT POINTS.
BECAUSE THE, anyhow THEer.
DISTANCES ARE ALL DIFFERENT. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THIS.
IS AMONG THE FIRST PLACES WE.
START TO SEE THE IMPACTS OF THAT. THERE WILL CERTAINLY I SUSPICIOUS BE OTHER.
LOCATIONS WHERE WE SEE THE IMPACTS OF THAT. VERY WELL, AFTER THAT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THE CONVERSATIONS OR RECOMMENDATIONS? DID YOU DESIRED TO CLOSE, ALDERMAN.
CHABOT? >> > > SIMPLY WITH WHAT Mr.WATSON.

SIMPLY STATED, THE PRICES THAT ARE.
GOING TO EVEN MORE PRECISELY REFLECT WHAT THE TRUTHS ARE.
IN REGARDS TO RUNNING THESE.
COURSES THEREFORE AS YOU SAID SOME ARE UP, SOME ARE DOWN. IT'' S GREAT TO SEE THAT SOME ARE.
ACTUALLY GOING DOWN. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
MM-HMM. NOT TO MY AREA BUT TO THE NEIGHBOURHOOD NEXT DOOR. MAY GET DROPPED OFF ON THE.
CORNER FROM KNEW– CURRENTLY ON. (LAUGHTER).
EXCELLENT. SO ON THE SUGGESTIONS AFTER THAT ARE WE CONCURRED? FIRST READING OF THE BYLAW ARE.
WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? CARRIED. 2ND ANALYSIS OF THE BYLAW, ALDERMAN STEVENSON?
>> > > MODIFICATION BEFORE–.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: INSTEAD OF THE BYLAW COMING IN, IT'' S. PASSED, THE LAW MUST COME.
MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN JONES. SECOND READING OF THE LAW AS.
MODIFIED AGREED? ANY OPPOSED. BROUGHT. CONSENT FOR THIRD READING OF THE BYLAW, AGREED? ANY OPPOSED. CARRIED. 3RD ANALYSIS OF THE LAW ARE.
HI THERE, HOW DID 10.3.4 GET IN THE SCHEDULE IN DIDN'' T KNOW THAT
WAS. > > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAISE. >> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: REASON.
ME, I'' M SORRY, ALDERMAN CHABOT. BEFORE I RECOGNIZE YOU, NEED TO.
ALDERMAN MAR. >> > > THANK YOU. IT ' S WITH A HEAVY HEART, YOUR.
AND CERTAINLY MANAGEMENT AND COUNCIL REALIZES I AM CURRENTLY.
BUILDING MY NEW HOUSE WHICH.
INCLUDES An ADDITIONAL SUITE IN THE PLAN ABOVE THE GARAGE. THEREFORE, I'' VE BEEN.
ACKNOWLEDGED BY CITY REGULATION DEPARTMENT IS HAVING A PECUNIARY.
RATE OF INTEREST AS WELL AS WILL NOT BE.
JOINING THE BALLOT NOR IN THE DISCUSSION AND ALSO I EXCUSE.
MYSELF AND ALSO HAVE THAT NOTED FOR.
THE MINUTES CURRENTLY.

>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU, ALDERMAN MAR.
>> > > WITH An ACHING HEART. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
ALDERMAN KEATING.
>> > > THANK YOU, YOUR WORSHIP. I DISCOVER MYSELF IN.
THE SAME WATERCRAFT AS IT WILL BE.
WITHIN An ISSUE OF DAYS OR WEEKS OR TWO THAT I WILL BE APPLYING.
FOR A SECONDARY COLLECTION IN MY.
KEY RESIDENCE SO I'' M DECLARING A PECUNIARY INTEREST.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU.WOULD YOU MIND JUST DESCRIBING. THIS PECUNIARY PASSION FOR THE. PASSIONS OF THOSE WHO ARE WATCHING. > > ABSOLUTELY, YOUR WORSHIP.
>> THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT ENFORCES CONSTRAINTS ON PARTICIPANTS OF. COUNCIL RESPECT TO PECUNIARY.
PASSIONS, SPECIFICALLY SECTIONS 170 TO 174 OF THE MGA ARE. INCREDIBLY VITAL AS WELL AS THE MGA.
LAY OUT THAT TYPICALLY SPEAKING THE PARTICIPANT OF COUNCIL HAS. PECUNIARY INTEREST IF THE MATTER.
COULD MONETARILY AFFECT THE COUNCILLOR. EACH MEMBER OF COUNCIL HAS AN. OBLIGATION TO EXAMINE THEIR OWN SCENARIOS AS WELL AS MAKE THE. DECISION IF THEY HAVE A. PECUNIARY PASSION AND IF THEY DO THEY ARE REQUIRED TO DIVULGE. THAT BOTH AT COMMITTEE AS WELL AS. COUNCIL CONFERENCE.
AND ALSO THEY REQUIREMENT DISCLOSE THIS.
PECUNIARY RATE OF INTEREST PRIOR TO THE. CONVERSATION OF THE MATTER BY BOARD OR BY COUNCIL. AND ALSO THEY NECESSITY ABSTAIN FROM. BALLOT AND ALSO SUBJECT TO EXTREMELY LIMITED EXTENSIONS WHICH DO NOT.
APPLY IN THIS SITUATION THEY ARE. REQUIRED TO LEAVE THE ROOM.
THE EFFECT FOR.
NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THIS. INFO IS INCOMPETENCY FROM COUNCIL.

> > OKAY. > > A LITTLE. > > YEAH. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I WAS LOOKING AT THE MAP. > > COMES RIGHT INTO REQUIRE THE DAY IT ' S PASSED AND ALSO THAT SHOULD ACTUALLY.IN THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION
BOTH ALDERMAN MAR AS WELL AS ALDERMAN KEATING EITHER HAVE AN
APPLICATION IN THE HELPS A.
SECONDARY SUITE OR HAVE ONE THAT IS UPCOMING FORWARD IMMINENTLY AND.
BY TAKING PART IN THIS.
MATTER IT IS EXTREMELY POSSIBLE THEY WOULD BE MAKING IT A LOT EASIER.
ANDLESS EXPENSIVE ON THEIR OWN.
TO GET AUTHORIZATION ALONG WITH THE OPPORTUNITY THAT THEY WOULD.
BE ENHANCING THE WORTH OF THEIR.
PERSONAL PROPERTY IF AS A MATTER OF FACT THE SUITE IS CONSTRUCTED.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
Ms.SLOAN, BEFORE

YOU SIT DOWN, I SIMPLY DESIRED TO HIGHLIGHT.
ONE POINT. YOU CLAIMED EITHER HAVE AN APPLICATION CURRENTLY AVAILABLE.
OR HAVE ONE BREWING. DOES THE DIVISION HAVE AN POINT OF VIEW ON THE WORD BREWING.
WHAT THAT INDICATES?
>> > > YOUR PRAYER, THAT ' S FACT SPECIFIC. EVERY ARGUABLE PECUNIARY.
PASSION MUST BE EXAMINED ON ITS INFORMATION. IN ALDERMAN MAR'' S CASE, IT IS. REALLY CLEAR THAT HE HAVE AN APPLICATION IN THE SYSTEM. IT ' S A REALLY INSTANT ADVANTAGE TO. HIM ON THE OCCASION THAT SOME AMENDMENTS UNDERWENT THAT.
WERE PROBABLY FAVOURABLE TO HIS.
PLACEMENT. RELATIVE TO ALDERMAN.
KEATING'' S POSITION, IT ' S A. LITTLE LESS CLEAR.
BECAUSE HIS APPLICATION IS NOT. IN THE SYSTEM BUT BASED UPON. DISCUSSIONS THAT WE HAD, THIS IS NOT A PIE IN THE SKIES OR VERY.
LONG-RANGE POSSIBILITY THAT MAY.

CONCERN FULFILLMENT ONE DAY.THIS IS SOMETHING THAT HE PREPARES.
ON MAKING A TRUTH IN THE VERY.
NEAR FUTURE. THE ACT ITSELF DOES NOT SPEAK.
TO IMTHENCY. THAT IS A SITUATION THAT IS VERY DETAILS TO HIS SCENARIO.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU SIGNIFICANTLY, Ms. SLOAN. I BELIEVE ALL OF US APPRECIATE.
SURE, I'' LL TAKE IT CURRENTLY. > > Ms. SLOAN, CANISTER YOU JUST.
INCREASE ON– I MEAN, I DON'' T SEE HOW ANYONE THAT POSSESSES A RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY.
THAT CONCEIVABLY COULD BE.
UPZONED TO A SUITE AND ADVANTAGE FROM THAT FINANCIAL LISTING IS NOT.
IN A PECUNIARY PLACEMENT.
>> > > YOUR PRAISE, AS I DISCUSSED EARLIER, IT IS THE OBLIGATION OF.
EACH MEMBER OF COUNCIL TO MAKE.
THEIR OWN DETERMINATION.BASED ON THEIR

OWN VERY PARTICULAR.
FACTS. SO WHAT WE'' RE DOING IS DISCUSSING THE ISSUE IN A VERY.
GENERAL METHOD. ONE ITEM THAT I WOULD MENTION TO COUNCIL IS THAT THERE THERE.
ARE A NUMBER OF EXCEPTIONS TO.
WHEN A BUDGETING RATE OF INTEREST EXISTS AND ALSO THOSE ARE OUTLINED IN.
AREA 170 SUB 3 IN THE MGA AND.
THERE ARE A VARIETY OF THEM AND ALSO ONE OF THEM IS DESPITE THE FACT THAT A.
PARTICIPANT OF COUNCIL COULD– OR A.
ISSUE COULD MONETARILY AFFECT A PARTICIPANT OF COUNCIL, THAT DOES NOT.
IF, come to be A MONETARY RATE OF INTEREST.
THE ISSUE– OR IF THE INTEREST IS HELD IN COMMON WITH THE.
MAJORITY OF ELECTORS OF THE.
TOWN OR IF IT ONLY IMPACTS COMPONENTS OF THE COMMUNITY.
WHICH'' S UNDER SUBSECTION I.
AND IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, WE ARE OF THE SIGHT THAT AS A RESULT OF.
THE IMTHENCY OF THE APPLICATION.
AND ALSO AS A RESULT OF THE APPLICATION THAT'' S ALREADY IN THE WORKS,.
THIS ISN'' T FALLING WITHIN THE. WORLD OF GENERAL ELECTORS.PEOPLE WHO OWN PROPERTY, SURE,. IT ' S CERTAINLY UP TO THEM– OR.
THE POSSIBILITY EXISTS THEY COULD MAKE AN APPLICATION TO.
UPZONE THEIR PROPERTY AS YOU.
SUGGESTED. NEVERTHELESS, THESE ARE TWO EXTREMELY REAL.
AS WELL AS EXTREMELY INSTANT SCENARIOS I.
WOULD SUGGEST SEPARATED FROM THE BASIC INTERESTS OF.
> > THANKS, Ms. SLOAN. > > YES. > > MY INQUIRY WAS, IS
THE–.
THEMSELVES, IS IT IRREVERSIBLE ON THAT MATTER?
>> >'> I ' M NOT>> CERTAIN. > > OR CONTAINER THEY BE AVAILABLE IN AS WELL AS OUT ON IT>>? > > YOUR PRAYER, UNLESS THE.
SCENARIO CHANGES SUBSTANTIALLY, I PUT ON'' T SEE HOW ONE COULD COME. IN AS WELL AS OUT. ONCE ONE IS DECLARED A PECUNIARY INTEREST, THEY HAVE A PECUNIARY.
PASSION AND ALSO THE ACT DOES SPEAK.
TO THAT TO SOME DEGREE. WITH REGARD TO DECLARING THE.
PASSION AT BOARD THEY ARE.
OBLIGED TO REMOVE THEMSELVESES FROM COUNCIL.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
ALDERMAN POOTMANS FOR MS.SLOAN? >

> MANY THANKS, YOUR PRAYER. Ms. SLOAN, YOU STATED THE EFFECTS COULD BE.
INCOMPETENCY FROM COUNCIL. COULD YOU INCREASE ON THAT. I'' M UNSURE WHAT A. DISQUALIFICATION FROM COUNCIL.
REALLY SUGGESTS. >> > > ABSOLUTELY. YOUR PRAYER. IT IS REALLY SUBSTANTIAL REPERCUSSIONS AS WELL AS WHAT THAT SUGGESTS.
IS YOU ARE NO LONGER A PARTICIPANT OF.
COUNCIL. YOU ARE DEPOSTED, IN A MANNER OF SPEAKING.
>> > > DEPOSTED.
>> > > YES, AND ALSO, YOUR WORSHIP, SECTION 174 OF THE “MUNICIPAL.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ACT”” TALKS.
SPECIFICALLY TO THAT AS WELL AS IT REQUIRES THAT– EXCUSE ME.
175 TALKS TO THAT. AND IT TALKS TO THE FACT THAT A COUNCILLOR THAT IS DISQUALIFIED,.
WHICH IS EXPLAINED UNDER AREA.
174 NECESSITY RESIGN IMMEDIATELY.IF A COUNCILLOR DOES NOT RESIGN. PROMPTLY, THEN COUNCIL MAY. APPLY BY ORIGINATING NOTIFICATION TO THE COURT TO GET AN ORDER. IDENTIFYING WHETHER OR NOT THEY. WERE QUALIFIED OR WHETHER OR
NOT THEY WILL PECUNIARY INTEREST AS WELL AS. WHETHER THEY MUST BE.
INVALIDATED.
AN ELECTOR MAY.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I. DON'' T KNOW WHY BUT I SIMPLY DISCOVER. ALDERMAN FARRELL OR HODGES FOR.
Ms. SLOAN? >> > > Ms. SLOAN, THE COURTS HAVE.
DONE THIS IN ALBERTA AS WELL AS I THINK.
ONE OF THE MOST RECENT EXAMPLE I REMEMBER IS MEDICINE HAT. WASN'' T ON A MATTER OF LAND USAGE. IT GOT ON A MATTER OF SERVICE OR BUSINESS LICENCES I RECALL IN.
THE EARLY '' 80s. IS THAT NOT INSTANCE? THERE ARE SOME ACTUAL COURT.
> > THERE ARE DEFINITELY ARE, YOUR PRAISE. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
INQUIRY FOR Ms. SLOAN,.
ALDERMAN FARRELL? PROCEED.
>> > > MANY THANKS. IF THE APPLICATION IS AUTHORIZED OR DECLINED BY THE.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND THERE'' S. NO LIVE APPLICATION OR NO IMMINENT APPLICATION, THEN THE.
SCENARIO WILL HAVE TRANSFORMED. IS THAT CORRECT? >> > > YOUR PRAYER, EVERY SET OF.
SCENARIOS MUST BE EXAMINED.
CAREFULLY AND ALSO ON ITS OWN MERITS. AS WELL AS I AM EXTREMELY RELUCTANT TO PROVIDE.
COVERING RECOMMENDATIONS BECAUSE RESPECT. IT'' S VERY POSSIBLE THAT SCENARIOS COULD CHANGE IN.
WHICH INSTANCE THAT PROBABLY WE COULD.
RE-EXAMINE IT. BUT UNTIL THAT TAKES PLACE, I'' M EXTREMELY. RELUCTANT TO GIVE ANY BLANKET.
ADVICE. SINCE THE REALITIES ARE VERY.
CRITICAL TO THESE.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I'' M FRIGHTENED TO BUT I WILL. IF, FOR EXAMPLE, ONE OF THE.
ALDERMEN WHO RECUSED HIMSELF HAS HIS APPLICATION FOR THE LAND USE.
CHANGED AUTHORIZED BY THIS.
COUNCIL, SO COUNCIL NO LONGER HAS POWER OVER IT, COULD THAT.
ALDERMAN PRESUMABLY THEN DISCUSSION.
ON FUTURE SECONDARY SUITE DEBATES?
( PLEASE WAIT).
> > OK. I WON ' T BELABOUR THE ISSUE.

THESE SO I ' VE BEEN PROMPTLY.
ATTEMPTING TO PEN THE ENHANCEMENT HERE AS I ' VE BEEN LISTENING TO.

ALL THIS VERY FASCINATING.
DISPUTE ON PECULIARRY INTEREST.I DIDN ' T RATHER PROVIDE YOU 35. DUPLICATES, MADAM CLERK. HOPEFULLY THERE ' S ENOUGH FOR PARTICIPANTS OF
COUNCIL WHILE I. REMAIN TO MAKE THESE. AMENDMENTS'. PETER. LET ' S HAVE An APPEARANCE AT THAT. JUST MAINTAIN CARRYING ON.
YOUR PRAYER, I HAVE 5. REFERRALS HERE.
DISCOVER A COMPROMISE TO OFFER EXTRA SECONDARY.
COLLECTIONS OR FACILITIES OF.
SECONDARY SUITES IN AREAS IN WHICH IT'' S EVEN MORE CONDUCIVE TO.
I HAVE 5 SUGGESTIONS RIGHT HERE, I'' M. PERSONALLY NOT PREPARED TO PUT. FORTH ALL 5 RECOMMENDATIONS.
I'' M ONLY PREPARED TO RELOCATE RECOMMENDATION ONE AT THIS. TIME, AS WELL AS BEING AS ALL PARTICIPANTS. OF COUNCIL WILL CERTAINLY AFTER THAT HAVE THIS IN HAND, IF SOMEONE SHOULD.
SELECT TO MAKE SOME FURTHER.
AMENDMENTS, FURTHER REFERRALS, I''
D BE. WILLING TO LISTEN.
AND ALSO BALLOT ACCORDINGLY.BUT AT THIS POINT I

' M NOT. YOUR PRAYER, SO RESPECTFULLY I ' M MOVING RECOMMENDATION 1,. ALDERMAN CHABOT.
PRIOR TO I REQUEST FOR SECONDLIES AS WELL AS PRIOR TO YOU TAKE A SEAT.
THERE'' S A WORDING MODIFICATION ON. PRIMARY THAT WE MAY DESIRE TO MAKE RIGHT HERE.
>> > > R 2 CAN BE EXCLUDED FROM.
THAT LISTING, YOUR PRAISE. BECAUSE, I SIMPLY OBSERVED THAT.
IT'' S ALREADY
NOTED AS. PERMITTED UNDER R 2 >>. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: I. THINK I CAN FIGURE IT OUT FROM.
THERE. IT IS SECONDARY SUITES.
CURRENTLY INVOLVED IN.
DISCRETIONARY USE SO THAT'' S WHAT WE ' RE REALLY ASKING THEM. TO MODIFICATION. THEY CAN FIGURE IT OUT. SORRY. Mr. WATSON, IN R 2 ZONES ARE. THEY ALREADY >> A PERMITTED USAGE? > > THAT ' S CORRECT. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI:
SO THE. ACTIVITY IS NUMBER 1 AS PUT BY ALDERMAN CHABOT BUT WITH THE.
EXEMPTION OF R2 WITHIN THE.
BRACKETS.WE ' LL OBTAIN THAT UP ON THE. DISPLAY SOON.
I THINK THAT CLERK HAS AN ELECTRONIC VERSION TOO. DO I HAVE A SECONDER FOR THAT.
ONE, PLEASE? MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN MacLEOD. WHAT WE'' LL DO, ALDERMAN CHABOT,. GIVEN WE HAVE NO RECOMMENDATION BEFORE US,.
IS WE'' LL TAKE THAT A PERSON AS WELL AS. THEN IF PEOPLE INTEND TO RELOCATE THE OTHER ONES OR ANYTHING.
ELSE WE'' LL TAKE THEM AFTER. THIS SET.
ON THIS ONE AND THE CONCEPT.
BELOW IS TO CHANGE FROM. DISCRETIONARY USE TO PERMITTED USAGE
IN THE AREAS FOR SECONDARY.
COLLECTIONS ARE CURRENTLY ALLOWED. AS A DISCRETIONARY USE.
Mr. WATSON, COULD YOU JUST.
PROMOTE A MINUTE ON THE. NATURE OF THE CHARM THAT WE CURRENTLY GET IN THESE.
LOCATIONS. ALL. IT'' S JUST– IT ' S– I THINK.
YOU ' VE ALL OBTAINED IT'BY.
E-MAIL TOO'. WHAT WE ' VE GOT NOW IS SIMPLY. NUMBER 1.
>> THAT ' S EVERYTHING '
>> S ON THE FLOORING CURRENTLY.
>> YEAH, I THINK IT

>> ' S COMING. > > YOU CAN STRIKE R2 OUT OF THAT LISTING. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: YEAH.
>> > > NO, ACTUALLY. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: O.K..
ARE YOU ALL READY? ALL RIGHT, AFTER THAT.
SORRY, LOTS OF WATSON. BACK TO YOU. > > JUSTIFICATION ME, TO THE CHAIR.
BECAUSE THE LAND USE BYLAW WAS. THAT YEAR THERE ' S BEEN 159 ACTUAL SECONDARY SUITE.
MANY OF THE APPEALS WE GET ARE NOT THROUGH
SECONDARY. COLLECTION APPLICATIONS.
THEY ' RE ACTUALLY THROUGH ORDERS THAT ARE PUT ON. PROBLEMS'THAT WE INVESTIGATE.
THAT WE'AFTER THAT MOVE TO ORDERS TO EVENTUALLY HANDLE. ACTUALLY WE ' RE OPERATING OUT OF.
ABOUT– WE ' RE RUNNING ABOUT A COUNTLESS THOSE ISSUES A. YEAR. AND THOSE ARE THE ONES THAT ARE TKHUL THE BULK OF THE WORK.
THAT ACTUALLY GOES THROUGH TO. TO GET A DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZATION.
SDAB. INTRIGUING SUFFICIENT IN ORDER 2, WHICH IS WHERE WE WERE SIMPLY.
STATING THAT SECONDARY SUITES.
IS ACTUALLY A PERMITTED USE, WE'' VE HAD VERY, REALLY FEW. APPLICATIONS SINCE THE LAND.
USAGE BYLAW HAS BEEN PUT IN AREA. R2, IF YOU'' LL REMEMBER,.
COUNCIL, IS ON THE EXTERNAL SIDES. IT'' S R2 IS NOW IN THE.

CREATING AREAS.IT ' S NOT IN THE ESTABLISHED.
LOCATIONS. IN THOSE AREAS WHERE YOU COULD HAVE A SECONDARY.
SUITE, NATURALLY YOU CAN HAVE.
OTHER UTILIZES. SEMI-DETACHED, AND SO ON. A LOT OF OF THOSE ARE TRANSFORMING TO.
SEMI-DETACHED AS OPPOSED TO THE (INDISTINCT).
CONSIDERING ADDITIONAL COLLECTION. YOUR PRAISE, I'' M UNCERTAIN WHETHER THAT TOTALLY ANSWERED IT.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: IT.
CERTAINLY DID FOR ME. THANK YOU. ALDERMAN JONES?
>> > > THANKS, YOUR PRAISE.
YOUR PRAYER, THE FIRST.
QUESTION I OBTAINED IS SO WHAT. OCCURS TO THE ADMINISTRATION SUGGESTION THAT IS WERE ON. THIS? >> ARE YOU FILING THEM? > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI:.
SINCE THE COMMITTEE IS. FORWARDING THIS TO COUNCIL WITHOUT REFERRAL, WHAT.
ALDERMAN CHABOT PUT ON THE.
FLOOR IS THE ONLY POINT ON THE FLOOR RIGHT CURRENTLY.
>> > > YOUR PRAYER, IF THIS.
MOVEMENT PASSES, THEN THE APPROPRIATE MOVEMENT, I THINK, WOULD BE TO.
> > OF MANAGEMENT. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: I.
THINK THAT'' S. >> >'I ' LL SPEAK TO THIS SHORTLY,.
ABOUT, UNITS THAT COULD BE. UTILIZED RIGHT CURRENTLY IN BOARD? > > THAT 116.000, YOUR WORSHIP,.
WERE THE NUMBER OF PARTIALS THAT WERE UNDER VARIOUS.
AREAS THAT ALLOWED.
SECOND COLLECTIONS. THEY ARE RCU 1 AND THE RC.
2. THE R 1 AND THE R2. THE R2 M AND ALSO THE R 1 S. THOSE ARE ALL THE VARIETY OF.
PARCELS THAT EXIST IN THE CITY WHICH TOTALS JUST OVER.
116.000, OF WHICH WE'' VE DONE.
SOME FURTHER ESTIMATION, ALMOST 86.000, 87.000 OF THOSE.
HAVE SINGLE UNATTACHED RESIDENCES ON.
THEM TODAY. SO IF YOU ACTUALLY THINKS OF.
THAT, REALLY FEW PEOPLE ARE.
GOING TO PROBABLY GO FROM A SINGLE SEPARATED HOUSE TO A.
SECONDARY COLLECTION IN STIPULATIONS OF.
PLACING ONE IN. YOU'' RE PROBABLY LOOKING AT.
ANOTHER PERSON 20, 30.000. REGARDLESS THAT'' S 116.000.

THAT'' S WHAT TOP NUMBER IS. IT ALSO INCLUDES SEVERAL OF THE.
MULTIFAMILY AREAS THAT COUNCIL ALLOWED SECONDARY.
SUITES TO GO INTO, BUT THE.
VARIETY OF– THAT WAS MAINLY IN CASES IN WHICH YOU HAD A.
STRANDED PARCEL AS WELL AS WISHED TO.
PERMIT FLEXIBILITY FOR SOMEBODY TO PUT A SECONDARY SUITE IN. A VARIETY OF THOSE PARCELS IS.
QUITE SMALL. >> > > A NUMBER OF THESE PARCELS.
COULD ALSO BE A LITTLE.
BETTER THAN A SECOND COLLECTION. THERE'' S PROBABLY A HIGHER,.
EVEN MORE INTENSE USAGE THAN JUST–.
>> > > THAT ' S. if YOU HAVE SOME OF THESE.
ESPECIALLY THE MULTIFAMILIES,.
THE OPPORTUNITIES OF YOU INTENDING TO RISE YOUR WORTH BY PLACING.
A SECONDARY COLLECTION IN IS.
MARGINAL UNLESS THERE'' S NOTHING ELSE AS WELL AS YOU'' RE A STRANDED.
PARCEL OR YOU HAVE A SINGLE.
REMOVED RESIDENCE. I DO SOME INDIVIDUALS MAY USAGE IT AS.
TEMPORARY USAGE.
>> > > YEAH. >> > > BUT YOUR PRAISE, AFTER.
HEARING THAT IN COMMITTEE,.
THAT WAS WHY I WAS BASICALLY OPPOSED TO THE NUMBER 1 AREAS. I FELT WE SHOULD MAKE THE MOST OF THE.
USE THE LOCATIONS THAT HAVEN'' T BEEN TOOK FULL ADVANTAGE OF YET. I ASSUME'THERE ' S ACTIVITY AS WELL AS THE. CONVERSATION THAT A VARIETY OF United States HAVE HAD OVER THE WEEKEND THAT.
PRECIPITATED THESE 5.
RECOMMENDATIONS WAS WOW, REGRETTABLE WE DIDN'' T HAVE IT BEFORE. BOARD. COULD HAVE CONSERVED A GREAT DEAL OF TIME AS WELL AS IT COULD HAVE CONSERVED A WHOLE LOT.
OF INITIATIVE OVER THE LAST TWO.
WEEKS.PROBABLY A WHOLE LOT OF

NAME-CALLING. THAT ' S BEEN CREATED. FROM THIS.
I ' M NOT PERSONALLY An INDIVIDUAL.
THAT COUNTS ON STUDIES. I BELIEVE IN THE CALLS AS WELL AS THE EMAILS THAT I'' VE RECEIVED IN.
MY OFFICE, AND THEY WERE REALLY.
PRIMARY OUT OF 9-1 BASIS ON INDIVIDUALS WERE EXTREMELY PERSISTENT.
THEY DID NOT NEED THESE IN AN.
R1 AREA IN MY COMMUNITIES. THAT ALSO ORIGINATED FROM EVERYONE.
IN MY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS.
OF WHICH I HAVE LETTERS FROM THEM INDICATING THE SAME.
THING. THAT WAS WHY I TOOK THE POSITION THAT I DID. BUT WITH THIS MOTION, AT LEAST.
NUMBER 1, WE'' LL SEE WHAT HAPPENS WITH 2, 3, 4, AS WELL AS 5,.
WITH NUMBER AT LEAST IT.
ADDRESSES THE ISSUES THAT EVERYONE HAS REGARDING AFFORDABLE.
HOUSING DURING. IT PERMITS OPPORTUNITY OF OVER OF 116.000 SITES.
WHERE WE CANISTER PUT SECONDARY.
SUITES.AND I THINK THAT ' S A BEGINNING. WE'' LL SEE WHAT HAPPENS IN.
FUTURE. THANKS, YOUR WORSHIP.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANKS.
JONES. ON NUMBER 1, ALDERMAN.
> > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER. I ' M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND.
IT CONNECTS TO CLOSENESS TO AN.
LRT STATION. IN NUMBER 1, R1, SUITES WOULD.
END UP BEING A PERMITTED USE. UNDER 3, THEY WOULD COME TO BE A DISCRETIONARY USAGE?
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: NO,.
> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THOSE. ARE THE ONES THAT CURRENTLY HAVE.
SECONDARY SUITES OF WHICH THERE ARE
EXTREMELY COUPLE OF IN THE CITY. CURRENTLY. IF I WAS ANALYSIS THE MAP APPROPRIATELY THERE ARE A. GRAND OVERALL OF FIVE PARCELS, I BELIEVE. THAT ARE R1
S TODAY. I DO THANKS
. I ' LL RETURN ON OTHER. ISSUES. THANKS.
> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: DID I. OBTAIN THAT WRONG, Mr. WATSON? WE
DID, WE AUTHORIZED 9 MORE.
>> > > EXCUSE ME. YOU REJECTED GREATER THAN FIVE, I ASSUME IN COUGAR RIDGE, ABOUT.
15 MINS AGO, BUT IT IS A.
SMALLER NUMBER THAN SEVERAL OF THE OTHER NUMBERS WE WERE.
> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANK YOU. > > YOUR WORSHIP, ALDERMAN JONES SUMMED UP A LOT OF.
MY EXPERIENCE REALLY PLAINLY. I AS WELL– STUDIES I TOOK A LOOK AT ARE THE EMAILS AND ALSO CALLS I.
GET, BUT I EVEN DAMAGE IT DOWN.
A LITTLE BIT FURTHER THAN THAT. THOSE WHO SAT DOWN AND ALSO WRITTEN.
ME A THOUGHTFUL NOTE AS AGAINST A CENTRAL HEATING BOILER PLATE ARE.
THE ONES THAT I LOOKED AT. THE MAJORITY OF CERTAINLY 9-1 WAS THE PROPORTION I WAS LEAVING MY.
WARD.
8-2 FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE CITY ENTERING ME. SO IT DOES PUT 116.000 PARCELS.
AROUND WHERE WE CANISTER SECONDARY SUITES CANISTER ENTER. THE QUANTITY– THE LAND USAGE WE.
DID ON SAGE HILLSIDE, AMONG MY CONCERNS WAS THAT WE PUT.
THOSE R1 S LOTS EXTREMELY, REALLY.
METICULOUSLY, EXTREMELY CAUTIOUS CONSULTATION WITH THE.
APPLICANT AT THE TIME,.
IDENTIFYING THE FACT THAT IT WAS– IT'' S NOT A LANED.
ITEM. WE PLACED THEM SO THEY'' D BE SENSITIVE TO THE AREA. SO THEY ARE THIS BUT IT WILL.
BE 15 OR 20 YEARS PRIOR TO WE REALIZE WHAT THE UPTAKE ON.
THOSE WILL CERTAINLY BE. BUT A MINIMUM OF NOW THOSE WHO ACQUIRE THE LOTS RECOGNIZE WHAT THEY CANISTER DO.
WITH THEM. THOSE WHO BUY THE WHOLE LOTS AROUND THEM KNOW WHAT MAY BE EXPECTED.
IN THE FUTURE. WHICH'' S THE

KEY.AND SO I HAVE NO TROUBLE.
WITH NUMBER 1. YOUR PRAYER. > > FACTOR OF ORDER.
SHOULD WE BE GOING OVER NUMBER.
1 NOW, AFTER THAT WE CONTAINER PROCEED >> TO. THE OTHERS? > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI
: ALITY.
>> HODGES. > >'EVERYONE ' S OBTAINED ONE EVEN MORE INDICATE MAKE TODAY. IT'' S REALLY INTERESTING DAY.
TODAY. WORSHIP, AND ALSO MEMBERS OF.
COUNCIL, NUMBER 1, COUNCIL.
HEREBY DIRECT ADMINISTRATION. SO THE LAST PAIR LINES OF.
NUMBER 1 IS “” WOULD NOT REQUIRE.
GROWTH AUTHORIZATION WHILE SEPARATE FORMS OF SECONDARY.
SUITES SUCH AS– IN SUCH LAND.
USAGE AREAS WILL CERTAINLY REMAIN AS A DISCRETIONARY USE””. RIGHT. WHAT'' S BEING MISSED OUT ON IS OUR REGULARS, THE LANDOWNERS,.
NEED A STRUCTURE LICENSE. SOMEWHERE, MR. WATSON, I'' D LIKE SOMEBODY TO PUT IN RED.
HIGHLIGHTED LETTERS,.
REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTING PERMITS, WHETHER THEY NEED A.
GROWTH PERMIT OR OTHERWISE. GENERALLY AROUND HERE WE KNOW THAT. BUT OUT IN THE REAL GLOBE,.
THEY DON'' T.I EVEN OBTAINED A GET IN TOUCH WITH FRIDAY.
FROM SOMEONE IS PLAINLY THE.
ORDER OF AN ILLEGAL SUITE, RC 2 DISTRICT, AND ALSO WHAT HE DESIRED.
TO ENSURE IS ALL THIS GOT.
HANDED DOWN MONDAY SO HIS UNLAWFUL SUITE COULD BE.
LEGALIZED. SORRY, LITTLE BUDDY, YOU NEVER DID INCONVENIENCE WITH A STRUCTURE.
PERMIT, DID YOU. I DIDN'' T DIFFICULTY HIM WITH THE FACTS. SOMEWHERE, THOUGH, WE NEED TO. TROUBLE SOMEONE WITH THE TRUTHS, AND LITTLE BROCHURE YOUR.
DEPARTMENT GENERATES DOES THAT,.
BUT THIS ISN'' T A BESTSELLER YET, WHICH IT NEEDED TO BE.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI:.
> > WELL, NO, I PUT ON'' T THINK IT. YOU ' RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT,.
OUR EXPECTATION AND ALSO CERTAINLY OUR HOPE WOULD BE THAT ANY NEW.
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION WOULD REQUIREMENT A.
BUILDING PERPLTD, AND ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WISHES TO BE AVAILABLE IN AT ANY.
POINT AS WELL AS SAY I'' VE GOT A COLLECTION.
AND POSSIBLY I DIDN'' T KNOW I WAS INTENDED TO HAVE A.
STRUCTURE PERMIT, WE WOULD NEED.
TO TAKE THEM THROUGH THAT PROCEDURE. CURRENTLY, THERE IS FURTHER ON IN.
THE RECOMMENDATIONS BELOW SOME DISCUSSION REGARDING THE ALBERTA.
BUILDING CODE, THE FRIEND.
DOCUMENT, THE FIRE CODE THAT WE'' RE GOING TO HAVE TO DO
SOME. OBVIOUSLY A PERSON WHO HAS BUILT A SUITE DOESN'' T WANT TO.
IN.BUT ALSO FURTHER ON THERE'' S. SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT HOW WE.
CANISTER FOCUS ON ENFORCEMENT, IDEAS, AS WELL AS MAYBE TURN THIS.
INTO A BESTSELLER AT SOME.
POINT. IT'' S A GENUINE CHALLENGE. I'' M NOT GOING TO STAND BELOW
. AS WELL AS SAY THIS IS GOING TO BE AN SIMPLE ROUTE. PEOPLE THAT ARE CURRENTLY OWNING.
COLLECTIONS THAT HAVE NOT COME FORWARD, DON'' T WISH TO COME.
FORWARD, (INDISCERNIBLE).
MOTIVATION BUT CERTAINLY OUR HOPE WOULD BE THAT WE WIND UP.
WITH SECURE COLLECTIONS, SECURE LEGAL.
SUITES WOULD BE THE MOST EFFECTIVE REMEDY.
>> > > I CONCUR, Mr. WATSON. SO YOUR PRAYER, I BELIEVE SOMEWHERE IN THIS FIRST.
REFERRAL THE REFERENCE.
I KNOW IT'' S BUILT. THE ENTIRE PROCESS DOESN'' T END.
TRANSFORM OR NOT.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: I'' M JUST TALKING TO Ms. SLOAN.
BELOW. , if ALDERMAN HODGES WERE TO MAKE MODIFICATIONS CLAIMING IN WHICH.
.
IT CLAIMS “” THEREFORE NOT.
REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZATION BUT WOULD NEED A STRUCTURE.
AUTHORIZATION””, WOULD THAT BE LEGIT?
>> > > YOUR PRAYER, THE TROUBLE IS THAT IT'' S
THE. PROVINCE THAT DETERMINES WHAT.
REQUIRES A BUILDING PERMIT AND WHAT DOES NOT CALL FOR A.
STRUCTURE AUTHORIZATION. IT'' S NOT THE LAND USAGE BYLAW.AND THE SAFETY AND SECURITY CODE ACT IS.
REALLY CLEAR THAT THE EXTENT TO.
WHICH A LAW PROFESSES TO CONTROL SOMETHING IN THE.
RURAL DOMAIN NAME IS.
FAULTY. >> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: WHEN.
WE SAY PERMITTED USE NOW,.
I BELIEVE IT'' S CRUCIAL FOR EVERYBODY TO UNDERSTAND THIS,.
WHEN WE SAY PERMITTED USE IN.
OUR LAND USE BYLAW NOW, DOES THAT IMMEDIATELY IMPLY.
THAT A STRUCTURE AUTHORIZATION IS.
REQUIRED? >> > > YOUR PRAISE, I THINK.
GENERALLY TALKING YES.
SOMETHING TO MAINTAIN IN MIND IS THAT ALTHOUGH SOMETHING.
MIGHT BE A PERMITTED USAGE IT.
DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT IT IS EXEMPT FROM REQUIRING A.
DEVELOPMENT LICENSE. THE ONLY TIME THAT SOMETHING IS EXEMPT FROM A GENERAL PRACTITIONER REURPBLT.
IS IF IT'' S IN THE
LISTING OF. PARTICULAR EXCEPTIONS. >> > > RIGHT. THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT.
THIS ACTIVITY SURMISES FOR A CHANGE TO THE LAND USE LAW. OF COURSE?
>> > > IF YOU WANT IT SPECIFICALLY SPARED FROM An ADVANCEMENT.
PERMIT REQUIREMENT, I WOULD.
SUGGEST THAT YOU PUT THAT IN THERE.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: IT.
DOES SAY THAT, DOESN'' T IT, COLLECTIONS AND AFFIXED FORMS IN.
SUCH LAND USAGE DISTRICTS WOULD.
FOR THAT REASON NOT REQUIRE ADVANCEMENT–.
>> > > PARDON ME, YES, IT DOES.
>> > > MY CONCERN STILL STAYS, YOUR PRAYER, NO PERSON IS GOING.
APPROXIMATELY EDMONTON OR TAPPING IN.
ON LINE, AS I GUESS IT IS NOWADAYS, TO GET A BUILDING.
PERMIT.

> > YOUR PRAYER, THAT ' S TRUTH SPECIFIC. > > YES. > > THAT ' S CORRECT. > > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER.
> > THAT ' S.THE WHIP DOWN HERE AS THOUGH INTENDED TO UP ON THE THIRD
FLOOR IN THE STRUCTURE
REGULATIONS SECTION.SO TECHNICALLY Ms. SLOAN IS CORRECT, BUT AGAIN CITIES IN THE COMPANIES OF PROVIDING BUILDING ALLOWS. IF ANYBODY WOULD BE SO GOOD AS TO BRING SOME DRAWINGS BECAUSE WOULD INDICATE WHAT THEY ' RE. GOING TO ACCOMPLISH. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: UNDERSTANDING WHAT Ms. SLOAN.
>> HAS SUGGESTED AND ADDITIONALLY. UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LAW AMENDMENT IS YET TO COME BACK,. IF YOU WISHED TO PUT AN.
MODIFICATION TO PUT THOSE WORDS IN TO DIRECT AS BEST WE CONTAINER. THE LAW AMENDMENT BEING.
ASKED FOR HERE, I WOULD ALLOW THAT IF YOU INTENDED TO DO THIS NOW. > > YEAH. WELL, I WOULD SAY THAT CONSEQUENTLY NOT NEED A. BUILDING LICENSE, COME MARKS.
BUT MAY CALL FOR A STRUCTURE PERMIT, COMMA, WHILE SEPARATED. KINDS, AFTER THAT THE REST OF IT
IS. A SEPARATE– REALLY A SEPARATE COMPONENT OF THE WHOLE. EXERCISE, WHILE SEPARATE
FORMS. OF SECONDARY SUITES IN SUCH LAND USE WILL STAY AS A. DISCRETIONARY USAGE. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: SO YOU DESIRED TO ADD>> COMMA BUT MAY. CALL FOR STRUCTURE LICENSE COMMA.
BEFORE THE WORD “WHILE”? > > YEAH.
> > DO I HAVE A SECONDER? >> > > THAT>> ' S THE MOST EFFECTIVE I
>> MAY DO ON– DO ON THE FLOORING OF. COUNCIL, YOUR PRAISE.
THIS LITTLE PAMPHLET, Ms.SLOAN, IF YOU HAVE A POSSIBILITY TO READ.

WEB PAGE 4, DOES SAY ADDITIONAL.
RESIDENCE UNITS, MEANING SECONDARY SUITES, BUILT AFTER. DECEMBER 31st, 2006, REQUIREMENT.
ADHERE TO THE ALBERTA BUILDING CODE. THE DETAILS THE CITY IS. GIVING IS
BASED ON THE REGULATIONS OF THE STRUCTURE, ALBERTA.
DEVELOPING CODE. NOTWITHSTANDING THE DISTRICT'' S DOCUMENT AND ALSO POLICIES. THIS DOES– THAT ' S WHY. I ' D LIKE IT, Mr. WATSON, TO ADVERTISE IT AS A LITTLE A. BESTSELLER IN THE NEXT WHILE,. IN THE NEXT YEAR APPROXIMATELY. YOU HAVE TO DO THAT.
YOU IN ENERGY BILLS, I PUT ON ' T KNOW WHAT DO YOU, TO OBTAIN THE. THANK YOU, PRAISE.
> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: MANY THANKS,. ALDERMAN HODGES “. FOR THE RECORD, YOU CAN CALL ME “LITTLE BUDDY” ANY TIME YOU. NEED. I KIND OF LIKE THAT.
ON THE MODIFICATION, ANY.

CONVERSATION ON THE 5E789, JUST.
> > THANK YOU. WELL, I ' M GOING TO ASSISTANCE THIS. AOEURPL GOING TO CERTAINLY.
I DO HAVE TO SAY I LOCATE IT. UNSATISFACTORY THAT WE ' RE.
TO– I ' M NOT GOING TO REFER TO IT AS. COMPROMISE DUE TO THE FACT THAT I DO CONCUR WITH COMPROMISE AND FINDING.
THOSE AVENUES WHERE WE DEMAND TO. MOVE ON, BUT THIS TO ME FEELS AS AGAINST COMPROMISE,. FEELS PIECEMEAL. AND I GUESS MY DISAPPOINTMENT HINGES ON A GREAT DEAL OF THE.
CONVERSATION THAT HAS BEEN.
HAPPENING IN THE GENERAL PUBLIC AROUND THIS RELEASE FOR THE LAST FEW.
WEEKS. AND ALSO I ASSUME THAT A GREAT DEAL OF, AS ALDERMAN JONES CALLED IT,.
NAME-CALLING, FALSE INFORMATION,.
MISUNDERSTANDING, COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED IF WE HAD.
ACTUALLY GONE ABOUT DOING THIS.
CORRECTLY. DISCUSSING WHAT THIS INDICATES.
PROPERLY. HAVING THE DISCUSSION AS WELL AS CONSIDERATE MANNER. I ASSUME THAT THERE'' S BEEN, IN. A WAY, TRYING TO SET UP OUR CONSTITUENTS, OUR RESIDENTS,.
OUR NEIGHBOURS AS ADVERSARIES. IN THIS IS NOT OFFERED.
IT HAS ACTUALLY NOT OFFERED ANY PERSON IN.
ATTEMPTING TO

ACTUALLY MOVE.
FORWARD.I THINK– I DO HAVE TO SAY.
THAT BOTH SIDES OF THE DISCUSSION.
HAVE BEEN MISDOING.
BOTH SIDES OF THE ARGUMENT. AROUND SECONDARY SUITES HAVE
.
CURE ALL TO AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE THAT THIS IS THE OPTION,. IT'' S NOT. IT ' S NOT THE
SOLUTION. IT ' S A PIECE. IT'' S A PAT OF WHAT WE REQUIREMENT TO
. DO, TO HAVE A COMPLETE COMMUNITY. IT'' S ABOUT SUSTAINING INDIVIDUALS
,. IT ' S CONCERNING SUSTAINING AREA, IT ' S CONCERNING PRODUCING.

A LEVEL EVER AFFORDABILITY. BUT IT IS NOT THE SOLUTION.IT IS NOT THE MAGIC
BULLET. FOR THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN. TOUTING THIS AS THE WONDER DRUG FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING. AND ALSO HOW DARE WE NOT SUPPORT. THIS TO ENSURE THAT EVERYBODY HAS A LOCATION TO LIVE,.
IT'' S NOT GOING TO DO THAT. THEN AGAIN FOR THOSE ON THE OPPONENTS SIDE WHO HAVE BEEN.
PROMOTING THIS AS THINGS THAT.
IS GOING TO BRING ABOUT THE DESTRUCTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD, IT'' S. NOT GOING TO PERFORM THAT EITHER. SECOND COLLECTION IS STILL GOING TO EXPENSE– STILL GOING TO.
REQUIRE A STRUCTURE AUTHORIZATION. IT'' S STILL GOING TO PRICE, I WEAR ' T KNOW
, $ 50.000 TO'PUT ONE. IN. THERE ' S NOT GOING TO BE A SUBSTANTIAL RUSH TO HAVE THAT PLACE IN. WHEN YOU HAVE A LOOK AT WHAT. EDMONTON, THE EXPERIENCE IN EDMONTON AROUND SECONDARY. COLLECTIONS, IN WHICH THEY'' VE PLACE IN,. I PUT ON ' T KNOW, GENEROUS, 100, 10 A YEAR BECAUSE THEY MADE THEM.
An ALLOWED USAGE. ALLOW'' S SAY WE ' RE WILDLY SUCCESSFUL IN CALGARY. HUGELY EFFECTIVE AND. CALGARIANS ARE TEARING DOWN THE DOOR AND ALSO WE PUT IN 500 A.
YEAR ACROSS THE CITY. WELL, SPLIT THAT OUT AMONGST 150 COMMUNITIES. WE'' RE TALKING ABOUT– HELL,.
LET'' S SAY THEY ' RE ONLY GOING IN HALF THE COMMUNITIES. WE ' RE TALKING REGARDING SEVEN IN A.
COMMUNITY.THAT ' S WHAT

WE ' RE TALKING.
ABOUT. THAT'' S NOT– ON AVERAGE. THAT'' S NOT DESTROYING A.
COMMUNITY. BOTH SIDES OF THIS DISCUSSION HAVE BEEN MISDOING, AND I BELIEVE.
IT'' S UNFORTUNATE. I BELIEVE IT'' S DUE TO THE FACT THAT AT THE END OF THE DAY I HAVE TO SAY.
WE ACTUALLY HAVEN ' T HAD THE.
CONVERSATION.
I WAS JUST AT SEM LAST WEEK. AS WELL AS I SPOKE WITH A LOT OF. INDIVIDUALS ABOUT SECONDARY SUITES, AND I NEED TO SAY THAT A GREAT DEAL'.
THE NATION, A GREAT DEAL OF TIMES I OBTAINED WHAT,'YOU HAVEN ' T DONE. IT ' S NOT AN ISSUE.IT ISN ' T AN PROBLEM.
COMPONENT OF THE BUDGET-FRIENDLY REAL ESTATE TASKFORCE WHERE WE LOOKED AT. OTHER CITIES. IT WASN ' T AN ISSUE.
I WON ' T ASSISTANCE
ALL OF THE. TO JUST STATE THAT I SUPPORT.
THEM– I SUPPORT THIS NOT UNWILLINGLY BUT JUST AS–. EQUALLY AS THE BIT-BY-BIT STRATEGY.
IS JUST NOT THE MEANS TO PROGRESS FOR OUR CITY AND IT IS. DISAPPOINTING. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN PINCOTT.
ALDERMAN CARRA, YOU ' VE SPOKEN. ON THIS ALREADY.DID YOU HAVE ANOTHER CONCERN? >> OH, FOR THE NEXT ONE.
> > YES, THANK YOU, YOUR. I'ECHO LOTS OF ALDERMAN PINCOTT ' S REMARKS. EXTENT DISAPPOINTED THAT THIS'HASN ' T BEEN THE IDEALISTIC AND.
UTOPIAN FULLY-INFORMED PUBLIC.
DISPUTE. AND ALSO THAT TO ME IS A DISASTER. THE EXTREME FEELINGS ON BOTH.
SIDES FOR THE PAST 3 WEEKS HAVE BEEN REMARKABLE. OUR STAFF IN WARD 6 HAS PUT.
TOGETHER A LIST OF YES AS WELL AS NO CALLS AND ALSO E-MAILS.
150 NOs, 99 YESs, TRANSFORMED FROM.
THE ORIGINAL OPENING. THE MOMENTUM IS GOING TOWARDS.
THE YES BUT NONETHELESS STILL.
AT THIS MOMENT 3-2 AGAINST. THE COMPELLING INPUT THAT I.
GOT IS IN COMMUNITY.
DISCUSSIONS WHEN I'' M AT THE SKATING PARTIES OR BARBEQUES.
OR WHATEVER FOR THE PAST.
SEVERAL WEEKS. AND I ASSUME THE VERY BEST WORD TO.
DESCRIBE THE FEELINGS IN WARD.
6 IS THAT THERE'' S BEEN UNEASINESS. I ASSUME THERE ' S BEEN A REAL.
STRESS OVER RESIDENCE VALUES, BEHAVIOURAL PROBLEMS, OWNER.
OCCUPANCY, PARKING, SECURITY. THE SECRET ISSUES WE'' VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT WHICH I WISH ARE.
ENSHRINED IN FINAL PAPERS. ARTICULATED IN THESE PROPOSALS ON THE TABLE RIGHT NOW, BUT I.
WILL CERTAINLY BE SEEKING THOSE IN
. THE LAW AMENDMENTS IN SOME WAY INCLUDED AS COMPONENT OF THE BYLAWS.
FOR THE CITY. I BELIEVE GOING THIS ROUTE WITH R2 AND ALSO ALL THE OTHER LAND USAGE.
AREAS IDENTIFIED I THINK.
IS An EXTREMELY SOFT FIRST STEP.I ' M NOT CERTAIN IT REVEALS THE.
POLITICAL WILL THAT POSSIBLY.
THE CITY COULD BE, BUT I BELIEVE IS SOMETHING THAT WARD 6 WOULD.
I THINK BE AMENABLE AS WELL AS I LOOK.
AHEAD TO ANALYSIS THE LAW MODIFICATION. I HAVE SOME CONCERNS, I'' M
NOT. IF NOW IS THE IDEAL TIME TO BE ASKING CONCERNS, sure.
CONCERNING THE PROCEDURE AS IT.
REVOLVES AROUND BRINGING FORTH THIS BYLAW AMENDMENT. WILL IT BE GOING THROUGH CPC?
Mr. WATSON?
>> > > BE ALL MODIFICATIONS OF THE LAND USE LAW COME THROUGH.
CALGARY PLANNING COMPENSATION.
AS WELL AS COME FOR A PUBLIC HEARING AT CITY COUNCIL.
>> > > IT WILL BE AN OPPORTUNITY.
> > THAT WILL BE A FULSOME DEBATE. THANK YOU. AS OPPOSED TO SO MUCH TIME FOR A FULSOME DISCUSSION.
THANKS EXTREMELY MUCH.

>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: ANYBODY.
ELSE ON NUMBER 1 PRIOR TO I CALL.
ON ALDERMAN CHABOT TO SHUT? ALDERMAN CHABOT.
>> > > THANK YOU, YOUR WORSHIP.'YOU ' RE RIGHT; PARTICIPANTS OF COUNCIL THERE HAS BEEN A WHOLE LOT.
IT'' S BEEN A WHOLE LOT OF DEBATE ON THIS ISSUE FOR LOTS OF, LOTS. NOT JUST FOR THE LAST COUPLE, 3 MONTHS.
GROWTH PLAN WHICH CHATS REGARDING AUGMENTATIONS AND ALSO SAYS.
COVERING METHOD I PUT ON'' T THINK. IS REGULAR WITH THE MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY.
BECAUSE IT DOESN'' T CONCENTRATE.
INCREASE IN PLACE THAT IS MAKE SENSE. THIS AT THE EXTREMELY LEAST IS.
THERE'' S A CERTAIN SENSE OF ASSUMPTION THAT AT SOME POINT.
IN TIME SECONDARY COLLECTION MAY.

CREATE BESIDE YOU.BY MOVING IT FROM. DISCRETIONARY TO PERMITTED USE,. HELPS WITH THAT CHANCE. IT PROVIDES AN BOOSTED.
OPPORTUNITY FOR INDIVIDUALS TO CREATE SECONDARY SUITES IN.
THOSE AREAS IN WHICH AT LEAST AT.
SOME POINT SOMEBODY IS GOING TO SAY YOU KNOW WHAT, I.
BOUGHT IN THIS LOCATION WITH THE.
ASSUMPTION THAT THIS MAY HAPPEN. THIS IS NOT GOING TO MAKE ONE.
SINGLE PROHIBITED SUITE LEGAL.NOT ONE.

NEVERTHELESS, IT WILL PROVIDE AN.
BOOSTED OPPORTUNITY. WE HEARD THE NUMBERS 116.000,.
BUT BECAUSE WE'' VE EXCLUDED R1.
N AS WELL AS RC 1 N IT ACTUALLY DECREASES THE NUMBER DOWN TO.
A FEW OF 6,800 OR SOMETHING. BUT THEN AGAIN THAT LIKEWISE DOES NOT INCLUDE THE MCG, MCL, MC 2,.
MHL, MH 1, 2, AND 3, AND I.
DON'' T KNOW WHAT THAT NUMBER CONSTITUTES BUT I TIN INFORM YOU.
THE OTHER ONES REPRESENT ABOUT.
66.800 EXTRA RESIDENCES OR EXTRA FEATURES THAT.
WILL RELOCATE FROM DISCRETIONARY.
TO PERMITTED. PEOPLE ARE WORRIED THAT.
THIS ESSENTIALLY REMOVES THE.
CHANCE FOR PEOPLE TO VOICE THEIR VIEWPOINT ON THIS. IT DOESN'' T REALLY ADJUSTMENT. IT DOESN ' T DEVELOP AN ONEROUS.
PROCEDURE FOR SOMEBODY SHOULD.
THEY NEED TO MAKE AN APPLICATION FOR An ADDITIONAL COLLECTION '' REASON
WITH. DISCRETIONARY INDIVIDUALS CAN. CHALLENGE IT, SEND THEIR COMMENTS TO THE AUTHORITY, AS WELL AS.
IF THE AUTHORITY, subsequently.
ACCEPTS IT THEY CANISTER STILL DATA AN CHARM AS WELL AS ENTER FRONT.
OF SUBDIVISION GROWTH.
APPEAL BOARD.THE EXPENSE FOR ADVANCEMENT. PERMIT IS SIGNIFICANTLY EVEN MORE. THAN A BUILDING AUTHORIZATION. THE– SOME OF THE NEW.
NEIGHBORHOODS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED.
ESPECIALLY TO ACCOMMODATE A GREATER DENSITY ADVANCEMENT.
THAN WHAT WAS STRICTLY.
AUTHORIZED BASED ON THE DENSITY BY THE INCLUSION OF RC 1 S. AGAIN, SEVERAL OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS.
PURCHASING THOSE RESIDENCES MAY NOT NEED TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS.
AS WELL AS PAY THE ADDITIONAL EXPENSES.
RELATED TO An ADVANCEMENT LICENSE. THIS IS SAVING INDIVIDUALS MONEY. IT'' S PROVIDING INCREASED POSSIBILITY.
TPHOEFRDZ RC 1 AND ALSO R 15 AS WELL AS. THE REASON'THAT I WASN ' T PREPARED TO RELOCATE THE REMAINDER OF. THE AMENDMENTS AS WELL AS WHY I.
INTENDED TO RELOCATE JUST THIS IS ONCE AGAIN IN MAINTAINING WITH THE MDP.
WHICH TALKS CONCERNING SENSITIVE.
ACCUMULATION, PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT, OPPORTUNITY FOR.
PEOPLE TO SUPPLY INPUT ONTO.
WHAT THEY WOULD LOVE TO SEE THEIR AREA DEVELOP OUT.
AS. WHAT ARE THE FRAMEWORK PRICES CONNECTED WITH.
RAISED INTENSITY? MUCH OF THE NEW COMMUNITIES PARTICULARLY HAD A PARTICULAR.
DENSITY THAT WAS VISUALIZED. IF WE BEGIN INCREASING THROUGH A BLANKET APPROVAL,.
THIS MAY BE A NEED TO BOOST.
OUR ROADWAY FRAMEWORK, EVEN MORE POLICE, MORE FIRE SECURITY,.
MORE RECREATIONAL CENTERS. THE LIST GOES ON.WHERE DO WE DO A COST.
RECOVERY? THERE IS NO MECHANISM USING LAND USAGE LAW TO DO THAT.
WITHOUT ENFORCING ADDITIONAL.
LEVIS SPECIFICALLY ON SECONDARY SUITES. THAT'' S WHY THIS IS SOMETHING. THAT IS EXPECTED, IT ' S NOT OUT OF CONTEXT, IT'' S IN RETAINING.
WITH THE MD. P, IT ' S NOT A PANACEA BUT IS GIVING ADDITIONAL.
POSSIBILITY FOR OFFERING SOME.
INEXPENSIVE HOUSING WITHOUT ADVERSELY IMPACTING SOME OF.
THE COMMUNITY. TO SUGGEST THAT THIS MAY NOT HAVE A DOWNSIDE EFFECT ON THE.
NEIGHBORHOOD I WOULD ARGUE.
OTHERWISE. SOME INDIVIDUALS SAY THAT THEY.
MAY– THIS IS GOING TO OPEN.
THE DOORS IF WE DO A COVERING AUTHORIZATION AS WELL AS SOME SAY THAT.
LOOK AT VARIOUS OTHER CITIES. WHAT HAS EXPERIENCE BEEN IN OTHER CITIES IN ONLY 200.
APPLICATIONS.
200 APPLICATIONS IN EDMONTON. 200 LEGAL APPLICATIONS. EXISTING LIP WE KNOW THERE'' S. ANYWHERE FROM 50.000 ON UP OF ILLEGAL SECONDARY SUITES ON.
THE BASIS OF THAT THEY ARE.
ILLEGAL.IF WE WERE TO

MAKE A.
TRANSITION FROM NOT PERMITTED.
TO PERMITTED, THERE WOULD BE A FEELING OF ASSUMPTION THAT THEY.
MAY. NOT WHETHER THEY'' RE PERMITTED OR OTHERWISE PERMITTED OR. DISCRETIONARY. ALLOWED. SO THE NUMBER OF OTHER ILLEGAL.
COLLECTIONS DO WE THINK WILL.
CREATE? THE AMOUNT OF HAVE CREATED IN.
WE DON'' T KNOW THAT. ALL'THEY ' VE GIVEN US IS HOW.
THERE'' S BEEN. I ' M NOT PREPARED TO MOVE.
WE WERE NOT ANY OTHER CITY. AS WELL AS I BELIEVE WE REQUIREMENT TO TAKE A SPECIAL METHOD. AND ALSO I BELIEVE THIS IS THE IDEAL.
DEVICE RELOCATING ONWARD SO I HOPE YOU'' LL SUPPORT THIS. > >> MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: MANY THANKS.
SIGNIFICANTLY, ALDERMAN CHABOT. SO ON THIS RECOMMENDATION, ARE.
ANY OPPOSED? >

> THANK YOU.NOW WE GET RIGHT INTO THE REAL.
AND ALSO AS CHOICE TO THE REAL ARGUMENT I'' D LIKE TO STATE THAT. I WEAR ' T THINK ANYONE HAS PLEAD.
BUDGET-FRIENDLY HOUSING. I ASSUME EVERYBODY'' S MADE THE ARGUMENT THAT THEY ARE AN.
ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE. SOLUTION. I STARTED COMMUNICATING WITH.
MY COMMUNITIES IN WARD 9 QUITE.
SOME TIME BACK INFORMING THEM THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT'' S. UPCOMING DOWN THE PIKE. AS WELL AS THAT THE ISSUE IS FRAUGHT BECAUSE IT'' S REALLY A TWO-PART.
INQUIRY. ON THE FIRST SIDE IT'' S A PRINCIPLED ISSUE. AND I BELIEVE THE RIGHT-MINDED. ISSUES ARE PRETTY SIGNIFICANTLY ON THE SIDE OF. THE ANGELS.
SECONDARY SUITES ARE A CRITICAL OPPORTUNITY FOR THE. CITY OF CALGARY IN STIPULATIONS OF. BUDGET FRIENDLY MOUSING– REAL ESTATE, AS WELL AS WE ' RE TALKING ABOUT FOR. TRAINEES, FOR MUSICIANS, WE ' RE. DISCUSSING FOR EMPLOYEES, WE'' RE TALKING ABOUT FOR.
SENIORS AND FOR ALLOWING. ELDERS TO'REMAIN IN THEIR HOMES.
IT ' S NOT A REMEDY, IT'' S NOT THE ONLY OPTION, BUT
IT ' S. PART OF THE SOLUTIONREMEDY IT'' S COMPONENT OF THE CITY ' S DEDICATION TO COMPLETE.
COMMUNITIES. IT'' S COMPONENT OF THE CITY'' S REQUIRED TO BE FINANCIALLY COMPETITIVE,.
PARTICULARLY AS WE COME OUT OF A.
RECESSION. AS WELL AS IT'' S AN EXPRESSION OF.
FAVORABLE BUILDING LEGAL RIGHTS AS.
OPPOSED TO NEGATIVE HOME RIGHTS WHICH IS JUST ONE OF THE FEW.
DEBATES THAT'' S BEING MADE ON.
THE OPPOSITE SIDE AT THE PRIMARY LEVEL. I SUGGEST MY NEIGHBORHOODS.
REVIEWED THE MAYOR'' S PLATFORM.I SENT THEM LINKS. AS WELL AS START HAVING A REAL.
DISCUSSION. WHEN YOU SEND OUT ME YOUR, since.
LETTERS, I WANT YOU TO TALK TO.
ME ABOUT THE PRINCIPLES IN TERMS OF THE CONCEPTS.
BECAUSE THE PRINCIPLES ARE.
WITHOUT A DOUBT ON THE SIDE OF THE ANGEL. THERE'' S ANOTHER PERSON SIDE TO THIS.
ADDITIONAL COLLECTIONS. THAT IS A VERY ESSENTIAL BUT A.
SECONDARY MATTERISSUE
CONCERN PROBLEMS WITH.
OUR LAND USAGE BYLAW. THEY INVOLVE TROUBLES.
WITH OUR NEIGHBOURHOOD.
INTENDING PROCESSES.THEY INVOLVE ISSUES. WITH OUR ADVANCEMENT AUTHORIZATIONS.
PROCEDURES AS WELL AS OUR GROWTH APPEALS PROCESSES WHERE A LOT.
OF THESE INVESTIGATIONARY.
CONCERNS ARE DESTINED TO WIND UP. THEY RELATE TO OUR.
ENFORCEMENT TECHNIQUES, AND.
THEY INVOLVE OUR CAPABILITY TO HAVE TKPHRUPBS WITH.
REGARDS TO THE REFORM OF.
RURAL STRUCTURE AND FIRE AND SAFETY AND SECURITY CODES. WE'' RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO. ADDRESS THOSE TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ANY TYPE OF MEANINGFUL MEANS.
UNLESS WE MAKE A STRONG.
STATEMENT REGARDING THE FIRST RECOMMENDATION WHICH IS THE.
RIGHT-MINDED SIDE OF THE.
EQUATION.HAVING MADE THAT ARGUMENT TO. MY NEIGHBORHOODS– I DON ' T KNOW. WHAT YOU ' RE SAYING TO ME. I ' M IN THE CENTER OF TALKING. THANKS. I'' M READY TO MAKE A MOTION, AND ALSO THIS IS MY OVERTURE TO.
MAKING THE MOVEMENT.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: HE SIMPLY HAD GREAT DEALS OF “” WHEREASES””.
>> > >'IT ' S A PREAMBLE,'THAT ' S.. WITH MY COMMUNITIES, I'' VE. RECEIVED 46 THOUGHTFUL LETTERS. AS WELL AS EMAILS IN FAVOUR, 28 THOUGHTFUL LETTERS VERSUS,.
FOUR UNDECIDED, AND ALSO I'' VE. OBTAINED ANOTHER PERSON 35 IN FAVOUR FROM THE CITY AT LARGE AND 27.
AGAINST FROM THE CITY AT.
LARGE. BUT IT BOILS DOWN TO THE.
TECHNOLOGICAL PROPOSITION THAT WE.
NEED TO BE ABLE TO ADDRESS THIS PROBLEM AND WE'' RE NOT PUTTING.
OURSELVES INTO A POSITION.
WHERE WE CAN ADDRESS IT.HAVING CLAIMED THAT, I WOULD WALK. TO RELOCATE REFERRAL NUMBER. 5, WHICH DESCRIBES 2011, 11 BACK TO MANAGEMENT FOR. ADDITIONAL FUNCTION TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE. QUESTION OF ALLOWING SECONDARY SUITES AS A LEGAL USE IN ALL.
LAND USAGE DISTRICTS WITH.
PARTICULAR CONSIDERATION TO, AND THESE ARE THE TECHNICAL PROBLEMS.
THAT ARE MAJOR BARRIERS, THE.
USEFULNESS OF A SERVICE CERTIFICATE SYSTEM FOR SECONDARY.
SUITES TO MANAGE PROPRIETOR.
PROFESSION AS WELL AS ENFORCE NEIGHBOURHOOD SPECIFICATIONS, AND.
B, THE GROWTH OF A NEW.
ENFORCEMENT TECHNIQUE TO FOCUS ON SUITES THAT ARE HAZARDOUS OR.
OTHERWISE NOT COMPLIANT. THE REALITY IS WE HAVE A HUGE UNDERGROUND MARKET IN SUITES THAT IS.
A TRUTH. THESE PEOPLE ARE DEALING WITH SAFETY AND SECURITY ISSUES, AS WELL AS THEY'' RE. COPING WITH SOCIAL JUSTICE.
ISSUES, AND ALSO WE HAVE TO ADDRESS THAT. AND SO I BELIEVE NUMBER 5 MAKES.
THAT MOVEMENT– PUTS US ON THE RIGHT COURSE AND ALSO IS A STRONG.
ACTION AND ALSO I URGE COUNCIL.
TO SUPPORT MOVEMENT 5.

AND ALSO IF YOU WEAR'' T, PLEASE.
EXPLAIN TO ME FROM THE. RIGHT-MINDED SIDE AND ALSO FROM THE TECHNOLOGICAL SIDE WHY YOU'' RE
>> NOT. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: MANY THANKS,.
> > THANK YOU, YOUR WORSHIP. WELL, I ' M GOING TO SUGGEST AN.
MODIFICATION TO THE MOVEMENT >>, AND.
>> THAT IS TO
>> REMOVE–'> > (FAINT).

> > WHY NOT? > > IT ' S A REFERRAL MOTION.THAT ' S WHY HE STATED IT.
>> INDIVIDUALLY FROM THE OTHERS.
YOU TIN ONLY CHANGE IT AS TO TIME.
> > THEN I WILL ELECT AGAINST.
THAT IN FACT IS ONE OF THE PROBLEMS THAT WE ' VE HEARD ABOUT
. THAT I ' VE CERTAINLY HEARD FROM. HOW ARE YOU GOING TO ENFORCE IT, HOW ARE WE GOING TO.
IMPLEMENT– HOW ARE WE GOING TO.
ENSURE? SO I TOTALLY ASSISTANCE ACTUALLY.
CONSIDERING HOW WE CAN DO.
ENFORCEMENT AROUND CONFORMITIES AS WELL AS NON-COMPLIANCE. REGARDING (A) AS WELL AS THE REASON I.
WILL NOT SUSTAIN THIS REFERRAL IS DUE TO (A). I DON'' T SEE THE POINT OF. MAKING IT An ALLOWED USE, REMOVING THE DEVELOPMENT.
LICENSE PROCEDURE, AND THEN.
ACTUALLY ADDING A COMPANY CERTIFICATE PROCESS IN ADDITION TO IT. I DO NOT SEE THE POINT. I WAS SAYING TO THAT 85-YEAR-OLD GRANDMOTHER WHO.
WANTS TO HAVE A SECONDARY.
SUITE IN HER RESIDENCE SO SOMEONE WILL CERTAINLY MOW THE YARD AS WELL AS CLEAN.
THE PATHWAY OF SNOW, AND ALSO OH,.
BY THE MEANS, YOU NEED TO HAVE A COMPANY. YOU HAVE TO HAVE A BUSINESS.
LICENSE TO ACCOMPLISH THIS.I DON'' T THINK IT ' S AN. IDEAL PATH TO DROP. I THINK CHANGING ONE PERMIT PROCEDURE WITH A LICENSING.
PROCESS IS– DOESN'' T CUT RED. TAPE. I DON ' T INTEND TO HAVE TO TURN. AN 85-YEAR-OLD GRANDMA.
RIGHT INTO A LOCAL BUSINESS OWNER. ON THAT MOTION BECAUSE IT.
HAS BEEN MOVED AND I CAN'' T. AMEND IT, I CAN ' T AMEND A REFERRAL, ALTHOUGH I DO SEE.
THE ORANGE BOOK IS OUT.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: YOU CAN AMEND A REFERRAL BUT WE'' RE.
TRYING TO IDENTIFY IF WE CONTAINER. >> CALL THEM SEPARATELY.
> > O.K. F THEY CANISTER BE CALLED.
INDIVIDUALLY, I WILL CERTAINLY SUSTAIN( B),. BUT IF THEY CANISTER BE CALLED INDEPENDENTLY I WOULD ASK THAT. YOU TELEPHONE CALL (A) SEPARATELY SO.
THAT I COULD VOTE VERSUS IT AS WELL AS I WISH EVERYBODY ELSE.
WOULD. OTHERWISE– >> > > I NEED TO MENTION FOR.
CLARIFICATION, ALDERMAN.
PINCOTT, WHILE THAT WAS BEAUTIFULLY WELL SPOKEN, AS.
ALWAYS, (A) ACTUALLY STATES GO.
CHECK OUT IF THAT'' S GOING TO FUNCTION, AND ALSO I JUST WANT TO BE.
CLEAR THAT THAT'' S NOT WHAT YOU. STATED. > > THAT ' S PENALTY. I DON'' T– AFTER THAT I WOULDN'' T. LIKE TO NOT HAVE US WASTE ADMINISTRATION TIME AND MONEY.
EXPLORING SOMETHING WHICH.
I THINK IS ENTIRELY INAPPROPRIATE.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI:.
BETTER.THANK YOU.

WE'' RE STILL LOOKING ON WHETHER.
WE CANISTER CALL THEM SEPARATELY BUT ALDERMAN CHABOT.
>> > > WELL, THANK YOU, YOUR. PRAISE, AS WELL AS ALDERMAN PINCOTT FOR MAKING THAT EXTREMELY.
PASSIONATE APPEAL TO NOT CONNECTION IT.
TO PROPRIETOR TENANCY. FOR ME, (B) IS SIMILARLY AS.
TESTING IF NOT A LOT MORE.
TESTING. AS WELL AS THE REASON I CLAIM THAT IS.
DUE TO THE NUMBER OF.
DANGEROUS SUITES THAT I'' VE HAD TO DEAL WITH IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD AND.
THE OBSTACLE THAT ENFORCEMENT.
OFFICER NEEDS TO ATTEMPT AS WELL AS BRING THOSE INTO CONFORMITY. THEIR INABILITY TO GO INTO THE.
PREMISES, THE COURTS NOT PROMOTING THE REQUEST TO GET IN.
RIGHT INTO THOSE PROPERTIES. THIS ISN'' T A CITY OF CALGARY CONCERN. THIS IS A CONSTITUTIONAL.
ISSUE.THIS GOES MUCH PAST OUR. CAPACITY TO LEGISLATE PAST. WHAT IT IS THAT WE '
VE ATTEMPTED TO ACCOMPLISH. I ' VE HAD BOTH. ARGUMENTS, PEOPLE COMPLAINING ABOUT SECONDARY ILLEGAL UNSAFE. SECONDARY SUITES NEXT DOOR TO. THEM ALONG WITH COMPLAINTS FROM INDIVIDUALS THAT OWN SOME OF. THESE SUITES BY HOW FORCEFUL.
OUR ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION HAVE BEEN IN TRYING TO GET IN THE. DOOR AND ALSO HOW THEY ' VE MADE.
THEIR WAY INTO THE DOOR, IN THEIR VIEWPOINT, AS OPPOSED TO. WHAT IS ETHICAL.
AND ALSO YET I LEARN THROUGH THE ENFORCEMENT POLICE OFFICERS THAT THAT.
IS THEIR ONLY CHANCE TO.
HAVE THE ABILITY TO GET IN THERE, OTHERWISE IT'' S VIRTUALLY. DIFFICULT. SO B, I CAN'' T SEE HOW WE COULD POSSIBLY CHANGE IT WITHOUT.
CHANGING OUR COURTS SYSTEM,.
CHANGING PROVINCIAL LEGISLATION, AND ALSO FEDERAL.
REGULATION TO FACILITATE THAT.
OR GIVE US AN CHANCE TO ACTUALLY GO INTO THESE SUITES.
AND DETERMINE WHERE THE.
SHORTAGES ARE AND ALSO ATTEMPT AND ALSO FIX THEM.

ALLOW'' S SAY WE ' RE WILDLY SUCCESSFUL IN CALGARY. IT ' S NOT AN ISSUE.IT ISN ' T AN CONCERN. IT ' S NOT A CURE ALL, IT'' S NOT THE ONLY SOLUTION, BUT
IT ' S. PART OF THE SOLUTIONSERVICE IT'' S COMPONENT OF THE CITY ' S COMMITMENT TO COMPLETE.
LICENSE TO DO THIS.I DON'' T THINK IT ' S AN.WE SIMPLY DON'' T HAVE THE TOOLS TO PERFORM IT.NOR DO WE HAVE THE POLICE OFFICERS. OUR ADMINISTRATION HAVE SUCH A HUGE STOCKPILE ON SIMPLY A COMPLAINT BASIS NUMBER OF ILLEGAL SUITES THAT EXIST THAT THEY CANISTER'' T. STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE PRESENT WORK. I TIN'' T SEE HOW THIS CAN. IN FACT FUNCTION. I ' M NOT GOING TO SUPPORT. IT. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN CHABOT. ALDERMAN LOWE?
>> > > YOUR WORSHIP, ALDERMAN PINCOTT SUMMARIZED THE.
DIFFICULTY I HAVE WITH An EXTREMELY–.
EXTREMELY WELL AND I AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY WITH HIM. FURTHER, IF IT WAS POSSIBLE TO.
MODIFY THE BODY OF NUMBER 5 TO SAY– REFER MANAGEMENT.
BACK FOR ADDITIONAL WORK.
INCLUDING CONSULTATION WITH R1 AS WELL AS RC 1 COMMUNITIES, I MIGHT.
BE ABLE TO DO SOMETHING WITH.
IT. DUE TO THE FACT THAT IT APPEARS TO ME THAT.
WOULD BE AN CHANCE,.
ALDERMAN CARRA, TO DEVELOPMENT THE CONCEPT, AS YOU CALL IT,.
DEBATE AND ALSO SEE IF IT.
SURPASSES HOW PEOPLE FEELING ABOUT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY CIVIL LIBERTIES AS A CONCEPT. RECOGNIZING THAT I CAN'' T. AMEND THIS, I TIN ' T ASSISTANCE IT BASICALLY BECAUSE IT
DOES NOT. INCLUDE THE VERY PEOPLE WHO. ARE DIRECTLY IMPACTED, THE INDIVIDUALS WHO MADE THE SINGLE.
BIGGEST FINANCIAL INVESTMENT OF THEIR.
LIVES PROBABLY, INVESTIGATED IT CAREFULLY, AND ALSO CHOSE TO LIVE.
IN AN R1 OR RC 1 AREA. WITH AN ASSUMPTION THAT THOSE PROBLEMS WOULD NOT ADJUSTMENT AT.
LEAST WITHOUT THEIR BEING.
CONSULTED.THEY MAY NOT AGREE, AND I ' LL. USE ALDERMAN FARRELL ' S. EXPERIENCE IN BRENTWOOD.
CRITICS ALL OVER THE PLACE. ACHIEVE AT THE END OF THE DAY
. > > FACTOR OF ORDER.
IF ALDERMAN >> LOWE WOULD BE. EAGER TO DISCOVER THE WAY TO INSERT THAT 3 WORDS OR.
MUCH LESS I'' D BE
SATISFIED TO CONSIST OF. >> IT AS AN CHANGE.
> > THE FACT IS, ALDERMAN CARRA,.
THE'PROCEDURAL LAW SAYS I. CONTAINER ' T DO IT. THE ONLY POINT I TIN MODIFY IS THE TIME.
ACTUALLY >> TAKE THEM INDIVIDUALLY; HOWEVER, WE–.
> > WE CONTAINER ' T CONSIST OF 3. WORDS? > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: NOT IN.
A RECOMMENDATION ACTIVITY.
HOWEVER, IF YOU AND THE SECONDER, ALDERMAN HODGES,. WISHED TO TAKE OUT YOUR MOTION. AND ALSO WE HAD UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF ALL THE MEMBERS EXISTING,. YOU COULD PUT A DIFFERENT.
MOTION. > > HE WISHES TO INCLUDE. NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT. I ' D MORE THAN HAPPY >> TO DO THAT.
> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI:. ARE WE CONCURRED TO ALLOW ALDERMAN CARRA TO WITHDRAW. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: NEVER.
HAS TO STAY ON THE TABLE. > > FINE. MY QUESTION WAS GOING TO BE CANISTER WE ADDRESS ALDERMAN.
PINCOTT'' S ISSUE AT THE >> SAME. TIME.
> > BUT OBVIOUSLY WE CAN NOT. ALDERMAN CHABOT HAS ACTUALLY CLAIMED NO. THAT LEAVES ME, AND I WOULD SUGGEST ANY PERSON THAT ' S. INTERESTED IN RESPECTING THE.
RC 1 PROPERTY AND ALSO R1 AS WELL AS RC 1 BUILDING PROPRIETORS, NO.
ALTERNATIVE, BUT NOT TO.
SUPPORT IT, AS WITH– AS SOON AS THAT OCCURS, YOUR PRAISE,.
SOMEONE CAN GET UP ON THEIR.
BACK LEGS AND ALSO RE( INDISCERNIBLE) THE MOVEMENT.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: IF.
THAT FAILS, THAT IS CERTAINLY POSSIBLE TO ACCOMPLISH SO.
>> > > THANKS
>>. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: ALDERMAN HODGES.
>> > > IF YOU ' LL ALLOW THIS AS
. DISPUTE OR OTHERWISE, YOUR PRAYER, SO I'' LL DELAY FOR YOU TO STATE. IN ALL THE YEARS OF THE SDAB.
CHARMS AS WELL AS REVIEWING POINTS WITH TEAM IN THE PREPARATION.
DIVISION, THE LAW.
ENFORCEMENTS DIVISION, I'' VE NOT RUN INTO An INSTANCE, AND PERHAPS.
Ms.SLOAN HAS

, WHERE A LAW.
ENFORCEMENT POLICE OFFICER, THOUGH HE WAS REFUSED ENTRY, INEVITABLY.
COULDN'' T AS A MATTER OF FACT ACHIEVE ENTRY.
TO A STRUCTURE BASED ON A COMPLAINT SHE WAS FOLLOWING UP.
ON. SEEMS TO ME SINCE THE EIGHTIES THE CITY HAS HAD THE.
LEGISLATION AS WELL AS THE MGA, PART.
17 OF THE MGA OF THE INTENDING SECTION, TO OBTAIN GAIN ACCESS TO,.
WHETHER BY MEANS OF COURT.
ORDER OR PROPERTY OWNER, HOMEOWNER VOLUNTARILY ACCEPTING.
AND THAT APPEARS TO ME THAT'' S THE WAY THE SYSTEM IS, UNLESS. THERE ' S BEEN SOME RADICAL. > > YOUR PRAYER, IT ' S POSSIBLE.

THEIR ENTRANCE. NEVERTHELESS, IF THEY DO NOT OBTAIN THE AUTHORIZATION, THEN THERE IS AN.
CAPACITY UNDER THE MUNICIPAL.
GOVERNMENT ACT TO MAKE AN APPLICATION TO THE COURT OF.
QUEEN'' S BENCH FOR AN ENTRANCE.
ORDER NONETHELESS THERE'' S An EXPENSE FOR A DECLARING FEE IN EXTRAS OF.
$ 200, THIS IS A REQUIREMENT FOR PERSONNEL.
RESOURCES TO ACTUALLY PREPARE AN AFFIDAVIT IN ORIGINATING.
NOTICE, IT CAN BE OPPOSED. MY EXPERIENCE WITH THEM, I HAVE DONE SOME, IS THEY ARE.
FAIRLY UNCOMPLICATED.
YOU NEVER EVER CANISTER PREDICT WHAT WILL COME TO THE COURT'' S. FRONT DOOR. SO THERE ARE SOME SOURCE IMPLICATIONS BUT THERE IS A.
TOOL AVAILABLE IN THE MGA.
>> > > THAT ' S WHAT I WANTED TO MAKE CLEAR, YOUR PRAISE. THAT ISSUE THE CITY FACED BACK.
IN THE PREVIOUS BYLAW TP– 2 P 08. AS MUCH AS I UNDERSTAND THERE''
S AN. ABILITY TO ACCOMPLISH THAT, THOUGH IT'' S SOMEWHAT ONEROUS. THERE'' S A FEE INCLUDED. AND ALSO OF COURSE IT'' S BEFORE A COURT AND ALSO YOU ' RE
NOT. GUARANTEED THE RESULT. THE PATHWAY TO THE COURT IS SET OUT IN LEGISLATION.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANK.
YOU, ALDERMAN HODGES.ALDERMAN FARRELL

. > > THANK YOU.
>> WELL, I WILL SUPPORT RECOMMENDATION WITH UNWILLINGNESS. I DO THINK THAT THERE IS A.
LACK OF CLARITY BY MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC ON THE DISTINCTION.
BETWEEN A POORLY-MAINTAINED.
ILLEGAL COLLECTION THAT IS CREATING MAYHEM IN THEIR COMMUNITY AND.
WHAT WE'' RE RECOMMENDING WHICH.
IS A SECONDARY COLLECTION. A VERY VARIOUS PET. AND ALSO UNTIL WE CAN SOMEHOW.
EXPLAIN TO CALGARIANS THE DIFFERENCE AND HOW WE WILL.
MANAGE THE DISTINCTION, I BELIEVE.
WE'' LL REMAIN TO HAVE THIS DISPUTE. WE'' VE HAD THIS DISCUSSION I ASSUME. CONSIDERING THAT I OBTAINED ELECTED.SO– AND ALSO I DO

HOPE THAT.
PARTICIPANTS OF THE MANAGEMENT.
CAN FIND SOME SERVICE, SOME MEANINGFUL SOLUTIONS, TO BARGAIN.
WITH THING B. WHICH IS MANAGE THE UNSAFE NON-COMPLIANT, AND I ASSUME WE.
NEED TO USE SOME PEARLY WHITES IN THE.
BYLAW. I KNOW THE BYLAWS EXIST, BUT.
MAYBE IT'' S THE UNWILLINGNESS.
THAT WE'' VE HAD TO CLEAN THESE POSITIONS UP BECAUSE THEY'' RE
THE. ONLY SOLUTION TO A GREAT DEAL OF. LESSEES. COUNCIL, I URGE EVERY ONE
. OF YOU TO APPEARANCE Mr. HALLADAY IN.
THE FACE, THE DAD WHO SHED HIS LITTLE GIRL IN THE PARKDALE.
FIRE– FORGIVE ME. AND INFORM HIM WE SHOULDN'' T BE ADDRESSING THIS CONCERN.
WE MUST ADDRESS THIS PROBLEM IF. WE CANISTER SEARCH IN THE MIRROR IN THE EVENING.
KNOW AS ALDERMAN PINCOTT CLAIMED. THIS IS NOT A CURE ALL BUT IF MY RESEARCH FOR THE
COMMITTEE. TO END BEING HOMELESS, WE LOOKED. AT PORTLAND, EDMONTON, TORONTO, VANCOUVER, VICTORIA, AND ALSO EACH.
OF THEM LOOKED AT United States WITH KIND.
OF BLANK ENCOUNTERS GOING, NATURALLY YOU DO THIS. THIS IS A NO BRAINER. IN A LOT OF THOSE CITIES IT OFFERED 10% OF THE REAL ESTATE,.
BUDGET-FRIENDLY REAL ESTATE, SERVICE. THAT'' S 10% OF THE HOUSING OPTION WITHOUT
A PUBLIC. SUBSIDY. NO, IT'' S NOT A CURE ALL, BUT IT IS REALLY PURPOSEFUL. AND ALSO THEY WERE JUST INCLUDING.
THE INDIVIDUALS THAT WERE BEING AIDED, THE LESSEES.
BEING HELPED, NOT.
THE HOME MORTGAGE HELPER FOR YOUNG FAMILY MEMBERS AND ALSO THE SENIORS THAT.
WERE ABLE TO REMAIN IN THEIR.
HOMES.WE HAVE COMMUNITIES IN R1 THAT. THEIR HISTORY BECAUSE THEY HAVE AN AGING POPULATION OR.
CONVERSATION THAT THIS IS GOING TO PUT A PROBLEM ON OUR WATER. OR SEWER OR FIRE DIVISION
IS. FRANKLY LAUGHABLE.
IT ' S UNDETECTABLE THICKNESS,. COUNCIL, AND ALSO IT IS SOMETHING I.
BELIEVE THAT WE AT SOME POINT IN TIME NEED TO OBTAIN OUR HEADS.
AROUND. SO I'' LL SUPPORT THIS SIMPLY BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND THAT WE DON'' T. HAVE THE NUMBERS TO GO.
ONWARD. AND ALSO I ASSUME THAT SOME OF THIS.
FUNCTION MAY ASSIST OBTAIN SOME INDIVIDUALS.
ONSIDE THAT HAVE A CONCERN OF WHAT THIS WILL CERTAINLY DO TO THEIR.
NEIGHBORHOOD. SO MEANINGFUL DISCUSSION, NOT SIMPLY A HOLD-UP, PLEASE, COUNCIL.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: MANY THANKS,.
ALDERMAN FARRELL. ALDERMAN MacLEOD?
>> > > THANK YOU, YOUR WORSHIP. I TOO HAVE HAD RATHER A NUMBER OF E-MAILS ON THIS
CONCERN, AND. QUITE FRANKLY A LOT OF OF WHAT.
I'' VE HAD HAVE BEEN AT SOME DEGREE'THERE ' S BEEN A GREAT DEAL OF.
MISINFORMATION, AS ALDERMAN. HODGES MENTIONED ON THE PROCESS IN PARTICULAR. AS WELL AS I DO THINK THAT WE REQUIREMENT TO. DO– WE DEMAND SOME EVEN MORE TIME TO PERFORM A BETTER JOB WITH.
RESPECT TO INFORMING INDIVIDUALS.

WHAT THIS REALLY MEANS.I WAS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT. OF THE TEN-YEAR STRATEGY TO END.
HOMELESSNESS. I DID SERVE ON A SUB BOARD,.
AND THIS COMPREHENSIVE ZONING WAS.
COMPONENT OF THE REFERRALS THAT WE MADE. AND ALSO I NEED TO SAY THIS WAS.
PART OF A VERY BIG CHALLENGE. IT IS NOT GOING TO ADDRESS THE.
PROBLEMS THAT WE HAVE WITH.
HOUSING AND BEING HOMELESS. AND ALSO I WOULD DANGER A HUNCH.
THAT VERY FEW INDIVIDUALS WOULD.
ACTUALLY PROGRESS. FOR A NUMBER OF THE EXISTING.
UNLAWFUL SUITES THEY CAN''
T BE. MADE LEGAL FOR REASONS OF THE FRAMEWORK
OF THE HOME OR.
EXPENSES RELATED, AS WELL AS I ASSUME. THAT OUR CAPACITY TO SUIT PEOPLE THAT ARE.
TRANSITIONING IN THEIR LIFE,.
WHO ARE OBTAINING OLDER AND WANT SOMEONE TO DEAL WITH THEM IN.
THE BASEMENT DUE TO THE FACT THAT THEY'' RE. BECOMING MORE INFIRM OR BECAUSE THEY ARE REQUIRING SOME.
ASSISTANCE IN OTHER WAYS, I ASSUME.
THAT'' S ESSENTIAL AS WELL AS I ASSUME– SO IT MANAGES. FINANCIAL ISSUES, IT BARGAINS.
WITH– ANOTHER PERSON INSTANCE IS SOMEONE THAT OBTAINS DIVORCED, IT.
ALLOWS THE HOUSEHOLD TO REMAIN IN.
THE RESIDENCE IF THEY CANISTER LEASE OUT THE CELLAR. OR A BEDROOM FOR THAT MATTER. AND WE DO HAVE THE ENTIRE EMPTY BEDROOM POINT. THE RELIABLE USAGE OF THE.
SQUARE VIDEO FOOTAGES OF THE RESIDENCES THAT WE HAVE THAT ENABLES US TO.
USE OUR FRAMEWORK EVEN MORE.
EFFICIENTLY, I AM A LITTLE– I AM GREATER THAN A LITTLE.
CONCERNED REGARDING THE WHOLE.
CONCEPT OF A COMPANY PERMIT, BUT I WILL SUPPORT THIS MOVEMENT.
FOR THE FACTOR THAT I DO NOT.
I BELIEVE THAT– AND ALSO IT''
S AN. I THINK WE NEED TO OFFER.
WITH THE ANXIETIES THAT HAVE BEEN REVEALED IN A NUMBER OF THE.
E-MAILS AND ALSO I ASSUME WE DEMAND TO.
ESPECIALLY ADDRESS HOW THIS IS NOT GOING TO INFLUENCE THE.
TOP QUALITY OF LIFE OF INDIVIDUALS THAT.
LIVE IN R1 LOCATIONS, AND WE NEED TO BE REALLY CLEAR AND ALSO WE REQUIREMENT.
BECAUSE OF, to COMMUNICATE THAT.
ALL THE EMAILS I'' VE HAD, THAT IS THE OVERARCHING ITEM IS.
THAT THIS IS GOING TO INFLUENCE.
MY TOP QUALITY OF LIFE.AND I ALSO HAVE TO ADD THAT. THE E-MAILS THAT I ' VE HAD THAT.
HAVE BEEN OPPOSED HAVE BEEN REALLY SPECIFIC TO ONE.
AREA. NOT ENTIRELY, BUT VERY PARTICULARLY TO ONE NEIGHBORHOOD. A LOT OF THE REST HAVE BEEN.
BROADLY OVER THE REMAINDER OF THE AREAS. THERE IS SOME DIFFERENTIALS.
THERE THAT I THINK WE ALSO NEED TO ADDRESS, AND ALSO FOR THOSE.
REASONS I WILL SUSTAIN THE.
REFERRAL. >> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANK.
YOU, ALDERMAN MacLEOD. ALDERMAN DEMONG? >> > > I WILL NOT BE SUPPORTING.
THIS EITHER. MOSTLY FOR THE SAME FACTORS THAT SO ELOQUENTLY MENTIONED BY.
ALDERMANS LOWE AND PINCOTT. I DO INTEND TO REFERENCE THAT THE SECTION B, I THINK, IS THE.
ESSENTIAL COMPONENT THAT WE.
HAVE TO DEAL WITH.I ' D RATHER IT NOT BE STATED IF.
THIS COMES UP AGAIN IN ANOTHER.
KIND OR MANNER, NOT SO MUCH AS AN ENFORCEMENT ON APPROACH. I'' D LIKE TO SEE IT TURN UP IN.
A CARROT AND ALSO STICK METHOD. THERE ARE 2 METHODS TO DEAL.
WITH THE SUITES AS WELL AS JUST.
CLAIMING IMPLEMENTING THE GUIDELINES ISN'' T ALWAYS THE ONLY WAY. ENCOURAGING TO RAISE TO.
CODE WOULD BE A FAR FAR BETTER FASHION. BUT NO, IN THE FASHION IT'' S. WRITTEN CURRENTLY I WILL CERTAINLY DEFINITELY NOT BE SUPPORTING IT.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: PEOPLE,.
EYE ON THE CLOCK. WE ACTUALLY HAVE SIMPLY ANOTHER PERSON.
MIN. ALDERMAN POOTMANS, DID YOU INTENDED TO … BECAUSE CASE, WE ARE RECESSED.
UNTIL 7:15.

THANKS.
“” CAPTIONING OF THIS CONFERENCE IS.
PROVIDED AS A COMMUNICATION AVAILABILITY MEASURE AS WELL AS IS NOT.
PLANNED AS A VERBATIM.
RECORDS OF THE PROCEDURES. IT MAY BE if INACCURACIES TAKE PLACE.
AS A RESULT OF HUMAN BEING MISTAKE, TECHNICAL.
PROBLEMS OR AN LACK OF ABILITY ON THE PART OF THE AUTHOR TO HEAR.
OR UNDERSTAND WHAT IS BEING.
STATED. WHILE BEST SHOT ARE MADE TO DOCUMENT AS CLOSELY AS.
POSSIBLE WHAT IS BEING CLAIMED THE.
CAPTIONS CANISTER NOT BE RELIED UPON AS A CERTIFIED ACCURATE RECORD.
OF THE PROCEEDINGS.””.
>> > > ALDER VIEWPOINT POOTMANS. >> > > YES, YOUR WORSHIP. HASN'' T BEEN MADE UP. I AM JUST THINKING. AFTER An EFFICIENT SERIES OF.
DISCUSSIONS AFTER DINNER, I.
THINK WE'' RE MOVING TO NUMBER 5, NEXT. WE'' RE ON NUMBER 5. WHERE ARE WE AT TODAY?
>> HAVE WE MOVED NUMBER 5? > > NUMBER 5 IS MOVED. > > NUMBER 5 HAS BEEN MOVED BY>> ALDERMAN CARRA.
> > YES, I HAVE A WHOLE LOT

TO SAY, AS.
A MATTER OF FACT.I AM SIMPLY ACCUMULATING MY. THOUGHTS. I BELIEVE THE SECRET TO NUMBER 5 IS THAT WE REALLY DO DEMAND TO LEARN.
MORE. WHEN WE REQUEST A TOTALLY EDUCATED DEBATE, I AM NOT EXACTLY SURE ANY ONE OF United States.
HAS EXPERIENCED THE TYPE OF.
DEBATE THAT WE WOULD HAVE IDEALLY SOUGHT FOR AN CONCERN OF.
> > MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN PEOPLE. ALDERMAN McLEOD, WOULD YOU.
MIND TRADING POSITIONS WITH ME?
>> > > YOUR PRAISE >>. > > THANKS SIGNIFICANTLY, ALDERMAN
. McLEOD. I AS WELL AM GOING TO ASSISTANCE NUMBER 5, FOR An EXTREMELY SIMPLE. FACTOR. WE HAVE BEEN TALKING TO CALGARIANS FOR WEEKS AND WEEKS.
AND ALSO WEEKS ON THIS, AND UNLIKE.
ALDERMAN PINCOTT, I DON'' T REGRET THE DISCUSSION. IT'' S BEEN An EXCELLENT CONVERSATION,. AND I ASSUME THAT WHILE PASSIONS HAVE BEEN HIGH, PASSIONS SHOULD.
BE HIGH, BECAUSE THIS IS A. REALLY IMPORTANT ISSUE FOR THE FUTURE OF THE CITY. WHAT WE HEARD CONSTANTLY WAS. THAT TODAY SYSTEM DOESN ' T FUNCTION.
EVEN ONE OF THE MOST HARD-CORE. CHALLENGERS OF ADJUSTMENT ADMIT THAT IT IS
RIDICULOUS FOR CITY. COUNCIL TO MAKE CHOICES ON.
SPECIFIC SECONDARY SUITE APPLICATIONS. EVEN THE MANY STRIDENT OF.
OPPONENTS AGREE THAT A SYSTEM WHERE WE WILLINGLY TURN A BLIND.
EYE TO TENS OF THOUSANDS OF OUR.
NEIGHBOURS ALLOWING THEM TO STAY IN A WORLD WITHOUT THE BASIC.
LAWFUL DEFENSES THAT THE REMAINDER.
OF US ENJOY IS NOT A GLOBE OR An AREA IN WHICH THEY INTEND TO.
LIVE. WE HAVE LISTENED TO THAT CONSISTENTLY.AND ALL THIS ACTIVITY

DOES, IT ' S. VERY STRAIGHT'FORWARD, IS IT. SAYS RETURN AND ALSO THINK
SOME EVEN MORE. WE DON ' T HAVE ALL THE SERVICES. WE DON ' T HAVE ALL THE RIGHT SOLUTIONS. WE ARE NOT WILLING TO QUIT. WE ARE NOT GOING TO ICE UP IN THE SYSTEM THAT DOESN'' T MAKE
ANY. FEELING. AS WELL AS I THINK THIS IS IMPORTANT. SINCE WHAT ALDERMAN FARRELL.
MENTIONED ABOUT THOSE CHILDREN IN.
THEY DIDN'' T HAVE ENOUGH WARMTH. THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE THEY GOT WAS AN UNSAFE ROOM HEATING UNIT.
THOSE PEOPLE.AND IT '

S BECAUSE WE, AS A.
NEIGHBORHOOD, HAVE WILLINGLY CHOSEN.
TO DISREGARD, SINCE WE UNDERSTAND THAT WE CANISTER'' T ACTUALLY.
IMPLEMENT THE SYSTEM WE HAVE RIGHT. CURRENTLY. WE WANT DO IT ANYMORE, COUNCIL. AS WELL AS SO MY OBJECTIVE IN ALL OF THIS,. IT WASN ' T ME THAT BROUGHT THIS FORWARD, I RECOGNIZE THE MEDIA LOVE. TO SAY IT WAS ME WHO BROUGHT. THIS FORWARD, IT WAS A RECORD THAT CAME THROUGH THE LPT THAT. WAS INITIATED BY THE PREVIOUS. COUNCIL.
BUT I DELIGHTED IN THAT IT CAME. ONWARD. DUE TO THE FACT THAT NOW THAT IT GETS ON THE TABLE, WE CAN NO LONGER QUIT.
WE CONTAINER NO LONGER SAY, APPEARANCE, THE. LOGJAM THAT COUNCIL HAS BEEN STUCK KNOW THIS FOR YEARS IS.
SUFFICIENT, SINCE IT ISN'' T. AS WELL AS SO, YEAH, WE HEARD GREAT DEALS OF EXCELLENT IDEAS. AS WELL AS I WOULD TOTALLY ADMIT THAT.
WHAT WE HAD ON THE TABLE GOING INTO TODAY WAS PROBABLY NOT.
EXACTLY THE RIGHT SOLUTION. WE'' VE HAD LOTS OF GOOD IDEAS, AS WELL AS ALL THIS MOTION DOES.
IS ALLOW US TO BE ABLE TO MOVE.
IT DOESN'' T SAY YOU HAVE TO HAVE. LICENSES, IT DOESN'' T SAY YOU.
BACK TO COUNCIL WITH SOME IDEAS, BECAUSE WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE.
SYSTEM THE METHOD IT IS TODAY IS.
NOT THE RIGHT ANSWER.IT ' S NOT THE LAST'SYSTEM WE. REQUIREMENT.
I URGE ALL OF YOU TO VOTE IN FAVOUR OF THIS BECAUSE.
IT TRULY GIVES United States THE ABILITY.
TO RELOCATE ONWARD, TO ACCOMPLISH SOME MORE THINKING, AS WELL AS FOR COUNCIL TO.
EVENTUALLY CHOOSE ON.
THE TYPE OF SYSTEM WE THINK OUR CONSTITUENTS NEED. THE LAST POINT I OUGHT TO STATE IS.
THERE'' S BEEN A LOT BACKWARD AND FORWARD ON WHO'' S IN FAVOUR OF. THIS, WHO PROTESTS IT. HERE ' S WHAT WE UNDERSTAND. WE KNOW THAT THERE HAVE BEEN TWO. CLINICAL POLLS CARRY OUT IN THE.
LAST YEAR. AND WE UNDERSTAND BOTH OF THOSE POLLS.
CALGARIANS HAD THIS WINTER BEEN TOO LONG, WE WOULDN'' T ACTUALLY. IT'' S AS CLOSE TO An AGREEMENT AS WE'' RE EVER GOING TO OBTAIN. AS WELL AS, YEAH, IT ' S REAL, THAT SOME.
OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS PRIOR TO I STOOD UP.
HERE, MAY BE THE ONES WHO ARE WHINING REGARDING THIS. THAT'' S TRUE. I ' LL PROVIDE YOU MORE INFORMATION if YOU GUYS WANT EVEN MORE INFORMATION. WE'' VE HAD 500 COMMUNICATIONS TO.
MY OFFICE.67 OR 69% OF THEM HAVE BEEN IN.
FAVOUR OF MODIFICATION. THE CLINICAL SURVEYS THAT WE'' VE DONE HAVE CONTINUALLY SHOWN.
THAT 75 TO 80% OF INDIVIDUALS ARE IN.
FAVOUR OF ADJUSTMENT. AND IF WE HAD INQUIRED THE.
CONCERN, IS THE STATUS A.
GOOD RESPONSE, I WOULD SUGGEST TO YOU THAT 99% OF THEM WOULD HAVE.
CLAIMED NO. SO, AGAIN, I MOTIVATE YOU ALL TO MOVE THIS SPHERE ONWARD, TO.
ASSISTANCE United States ACTION DOWN THE FIELD, AS WELL AS.
TO AID United States DO WHAT'' S RIGHT FOR ALL OF OUR NEIGHBOURS. THANKS, YOUR WORSHIP. THERE'' S NO OTHER LIGHTING ON', SO WE ' LL CALL THE CONCERN. ALDERMAN CARRA TO CLOSE.
>> > > YEAH, I CONCUR WITH WHAT THE MAYOR SAID. WE DISCUSSED– I JUST DESIRED.
TO MAKE THE POINT THAT NOTHING THAT WE'' VE ACCEPTED
DO OR PERHAPS. CONTEMPLATED TO ACCOMPLISH TODAY IS
THE. ANSWER. TO'ANY QUESTION.
IT ' S KIND OF A CHICKEN AND EGG.
ADDITIONAL COLLECTIONS ARE NOT THE. NOTHING WE ' VE CONTEMPLATED TODAY OR CONSIDERED CONTEMPLATING.
TODAY IS THE SOLUTION TO SECONDARY.
AND ALSO SO I MOTIVATE YOU GUYS TO SUPPORT THIS BECAUSE IT ' S MOVING. SCENARIO, AND ALSO IT OFFERS THE OPPORTUNITY TO GET TO A TENABLE.
LOCATION IN THE FUTURE. THEREFORE I HOPE– I HOPE WE'' LL VOTE FOR THIS.
>> THANKS. > > THANK YOU, ALDERMAN CARRA. > > I SIMPLY DESIRED TO MAKE CERTAIN OR.
VERIFY THAT WE CONTAINER CALL THIS IN.
TWO PARTS, WITH PART– WITH SUBSECTION “” A”” BEING THE SECOND.
> > AND I HAVE BEEN ASKED FOR A.
RECORDED VOTE AS WELL ON EACH. HOW AM I GOING TO TELEPHONE CALL IT? WE'' LL CALL A FIRST AND THEN B.
>> > > ON PROCEDURETREATMENT YOUR WORSHIP.
PREAMBLE HAS MATERIAL IN IT WHICH.
“A”” HAS, FOR INSTANCE, I CAN'' T. SUPPORT, AS WELL AS “B”, IT ' S GOT TO BE. > > YOU'CAN ' T ASSISTANCE
ANY OF. > > IF I MAY, ALDERMAN McLEOD.
AGAIN ON TREATMENT, I DID CHECK.
AS WELL AS THE PREAMBLE READS INTO “” A”” AN IT'' S READ “THAT “B” SO.
WHAT YOU ARE TRULY CALLING IS.
PRELUDE An AND AFTER THAT PRELUDE B.

>> > > OKAY>>. > > IS EVERYBODY CLEAR WHAT WE'' RE. BALLOT >> ON? > > SORRY. I– I AM NOT. BECAUSE ARE WE FROM WHAT THE MAYOR JUST STATED, WOULD WE BE.
TECHNICALLY BALLOT ON THE.
PREAMBLE TWO TIMES? >> > > YEAH.
>> > > O.K.. I SIMPLY INTENDED TO CONFIRM THAT, THANKS.
>> > > THAT WOULD BE MY.
UNDERSTANDING. SO WE'' RE CALLING A RECORDED BALLOT. ON “” A””.
>> > > A RECORDED VOTE, ALDERMAN HODGES FOR, ALDERMAN FARRELL.
FOR, ALDERMAN CARRA FOR,. ALDERMAN CHABOT AGAINST, ALDERMAN DEMONG AGAINST. MAYOR NENSHI FOR. ALDERMAN LOW AGAINST.
>> ALDERMAN PROMPT FOR.
> > ALDERMAN STEVENSON AGAINST,. ALDERMAN JONES AGAINST, ALDERMAN PINCOTT AGAINST, AS WELL AS ALDERMAN. >> McLEOD FOR. THAT ' S LOTS, YOUR WORSHIP.
>> > > MANY THANKS. AND CURRENTLY WE ' LL BALLOT ON “B”. > > TAPED BALLOT, FOR 5 B, ALDERMAN HODGES FOR, ALDERMAN.
FARRELL FOR, ALDERMAN CARRA FOR,.
ALDERMAN CHABOT AGAINST, ALDERMAN DEMONG AGAINST, MAYOR. NENSHI FOR, ALDERMAN LOWE.
AGAINST, ALDERMAN POOTMANS FOR, ALDERMAN STEPHENSON AGAINST,. ALDERMAN JONES AGAINST, ALDERMAN.
PINCOTT FOR,

>> ACTING MAYOR MacLEOD FOR. THAT ' S BROUGHT, YOUR
>> PRAYER. 7-6. > > AS WELL AS WE ' RE OFF.
ALDERMAN CARRA. > > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER.
ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS A SERIES OF. CHICKEN AS WELL AS EGGS THAT WE ' RE.
TAKING CARE OF TODAY. REFERRAL NUMBER 4, DIRECT. MANAGEMENT TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE.
ALBERTA BUILDING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR SECONDARY.
COLLECTIONS WITH REGARD TO.
REQUIREMENTS THAT HAVE A MATERIAL EFFECT ON THE.
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF SUCH.
SUITES, BUT DO NOT HAVE AN INFLUENCE ON THE SAFETY AND SECURITY OF THOSE.
HOUSES BASED ON THOSE FINDINGS,.
PREPARE A COLLECTION OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPING CODE FOR.
DISCUSSION TO THE PROVINCIAL.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, AS WELL AS REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL NO LATER THAN 2011 JUNE. THIS IS AN IMPORTANT ELEMENT.
OF THE PROCEDURE. WE CANISTER NOT EVEN BEGIN TO ADDRESS.
SECONDARY SUITES WITHOUT.
ADDRESSING– THERE'' S A LOTS OF OTHER DETAILS THAT WE NEED TO.
ADDRESS, BUT WE DEMAND TO BRING.
THE PROVINCE ON SIDE AS WELL AS WE NEED TO SEND A SOLID MESSAGE TO THE.
DISTRICT THAT WE'' RE EAGER TO ACCOMPLISH.
THIS WORK. SO I ENCOURAGE YOU GUYS TO.
SUPPORT THIS.
>> > > THANKS, ALDERMAN CARRA, AND ALDERMAN FARRELL IS SECONDING. IF, and I WOULD BE REALLY HAPPY.
A PERSON WERE TO ASK ME A CONCERN ABOUT MY CONVERSATIONS.
WITH THE RURAL GOVERNMENT.
> > WELL, I ASSUME I '>> LL ASK THAT CONCERN BECAUSE IN REALITY THAT ' S. THERE FOR A COUPLE OF SEC AS TO WHETHER IN FACT THERE HASN ' T. ALREADY BEEN A DISCUSSION ABOUT.
THIS.

> > WE CANISTER ' T INCLUDE 3. > > IF YOU ' LL ALLOW THIS AS
. > > YOUR PRAISE, IT ' S POSSIBLE. > > THAT ' S WHAT I WANTED TO MAKE CLEAR, YOUR WORSHIP. > > AND ALSO WE ' RE OFF.GIVEN WHAT I LISTENED TO AT MLA
MURMUR IN MY EAR DURING THE
PARTY OF THE CHINESE NEW YEAR'' S AT THE END OF
JANUARY OF 2011.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I TIN ABSOLUTELY FILL UP COUNCIL KNOW MY
CONVERSATIONS. TO BACK UP A BIT, AS MUCH OF YOU RECOGNIZE, THERE WAS AN MLA
COMMITTEE CHAIRED BY MLA MOE
EMERY, SOME YEARS EARLIER. WHOSE OBJECTIVE WAS TO SIMPLIFY
STRUCTURE AND FIRE CODE
POLICIES AROUND SECONDARY SUITES. AS WELL AS A LOT OF THEM, THEY'' RE VERY COMMON SENSE. THERE IS ONE STICKY ONE WHICH IS THE NEED FOR A SEPARATE HOME HEATING SYSTEM AS WELL AS AIR DUCTS WORK FOR THE ADDITIONAL SUITE AS WELL AS WE JUST GOT AN ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM THAT SAID THAT THAT COULD BE DEFINED AS– YOU GUYS ARE GOING TO BE SHOCKED AT THIS– A.
SEPARATE HEATING SYSTEM OR A ROOM HEATER. YES. EXACTLY. I HAVE– I HAVE SPOKE WITH.
THE PREACHER ON THIS ISSUE A.
NUMBER OF TIMES, AND ALSO HE HAS SUGGESTED, AS– AND Mr.GOUPD.

ROU WROTE ME BACK, WROTE A.
LETTER BACK SAYING THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT THAT WOULD BE.
READY TO CONSIDER. MY SENSE IN ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE LINES IS IT WOULD BE EASIER FOR.
IF COUNCIL, THEM TO CONSIDER IT.
WERE TO LICENSE US TO ACTUALLY MAKE AN ASK ON THAT PARTICULAR. FOR ME, THIS REALLY SOME THAT.
2 HEATERS ISSUE. >> > > YES, BUT THE THREAT WOULD BE.
THE PROBLEM– I AM TRYING TO BE.
SEVERE, THE ISSUE WOULD BE IF THEY TAKE THE 2ND FURNACE OUT.
AS A REQUIREMENT AS WELL AS LEAVE THE.
ROOM HEATING UNIT IN.SO YOUR PRAISE, WHEN YOU ARE.
DISCUSSING IT WITH THEM, AS I.
KNOW OR THEY ARE DISCUSSING IT WITH YOU, WATCH, YOU RECOGNIZE,.
ON THAT, THAT THEY DON'' T– WE. DON ' T WIND UP WITH A SPACE HEATING UNIT REGIMEN. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I. ABSOLUTELY WILL, ALDERMAN HODGES AND ALSO IN REALITY I MISSPOKE A LITTLE.
A MOMENT AGO. IT WAS IN FACT THE LETT FROM THE PREACHER THAT CLAIMED, IN HIS.
MIND, A SPACE HEATER IS GOOD,.
AND IF COUNCIL PASSES THIS, I WILL BE ABLE TO WRITE HIM A KEEP IN MIND.
GOING, UMM, NO. ALDERMAN CHABOT. >> > > MANY THANKS, YOUR WORSHIP.
WELL, AS YOU INDICATED, THERE. WAS SOME DISCUSSION SOMETIME AGO TO TRY AS WELL AS RELAX SEVERAL OF THOSE.
POLICIES TO PROMOTE.
BRINGING SOME OF THESE UNITS INTO COMPLIANCE MORE QUICKLY, AND ALSO.
WHEN IT INVOLVES LEISURE OF.
GUIDELINES, AND ALSO ALTHOUGH SOME MAY NOT BELIEVE IT HAS A.
PRODUCT SECURITY EFFECT, AS YOU.
MENTIONED YOURSELF, EVEN A SEPARATE HEATING SYSTEM, HAVING LIVED.
IN BASEMENT SUITES MICE.
DIRECTLY, I TIN– I TIN VOUCH FOR ONE POINT FOR CERTAIN. WE NEVER SEEM TO AGREE ON.
TEMPERATURE LEVEL, US AS WELL AS THE INDIVIDUALS ABOVE. SO WHETHER IT'' S THE UPSTAIRS.
THAT'' S BOILING OR THE DOWNSTAIRS THAT'' S HOT, THERE APPEARS TO.
BE A DEMAND TO SUPPLEMENT WARM. IN SOME WAY, SOME WAY, IN ONE OF THE SPACES.
AND ALSO THEREIN EXISTS PART OF THE. CHALLENGE.AND IT EXCEEDS THAT. WHAT VARIOUS OTHER LEISURES WILL.
THERE BE? I RECOGNIZE AMONG THE PROPOSITIONS HAD.
TO ACCOMPLISH WITH CEILING HEIGHTS,.
RELAX THE REQUIREMENT FOR CEILING HEIGHTS. I UNDERSTAND THAT CEILING LEVELS MAY.
NOT BE An ISSUE FOR A GUY OF MY HEIGHT, BUT PEOPLE THAT ARE.
DRAMATICALLY TALLER THAN ME,.
WHICH IS PROBABLY THE MAJORITY OF THE POPULATION, MAY HAVE.
ISSUE WITH THE LEISURE ON.
A FEW OF THOSE CEILING HEIGHTS, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU REMAIN IN THE.
MIDDLE OF A SITUATION AND YOU CAN'' T. SEE WHERE YOU ' RE GOING.WHAT OTHER RELAXATIONS WOULD. THERE BE? SEPARATE ENTRANCE, DOOR THAT OPENS IN VERSUS OUT, I PUT ON ' T.
KNOW WHAT EVERY ONE OF THE RELAXATIONS.
ARE, BUT I AM NOT SUPPORTIVE OF ANY INITIATIVE THAT WILL.
CONCESSION OR POSSIBLY.
CONCESSION THE SECURITY OF INDIVIDUALS THAT STAY WITHIN A.
BUILDING. SO I AM NOT GOING TO ASSISTANCE THIS.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
THANKS, ALDERMAN CHABOT. ALDERMAN LOWE?
>> > > MY QUESTIONS TO– I AM NOT.
TOO SURE THAT CONTAINER ANSWER IT. HOW LONG DOES IT USUALLY TAKE.
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF ALBERTA TO.
MAKE A REGULATORY ADJUSTMENT SUCH AS THIS?
>> > > Mr. WATSON
>>. > > IT TAKES A LONG PERIOD OF TIME.
ACTUALLY,.
GOVERNMENT, AND ALSO THERE ' S A– ON. > > I ASK YOURSELF IF I COULD OBTAIN YOU. > > THAT ' S BETTER, YEAH.
> > I WAS JUST SAYING THAT. APRIL 15th IS ACTUALLY A. DEADLINE RIGHT NOW FOR THEM TO CONSIDER CHANGES FOR THE 2012.
ALBERTA STRUCTURE

CODE, AS'A. ISSUE OF FACT.SO THAT '
S THE TYPE OF PREPARATION. THEY ARE SPEAKING ABOUT. I HAVE A MEMORANDUM CONCERNING YOU IN A COUPLE OF DAYS THAT THEY ' RE. GOING TO OUTLINE THE ONES THAT.
OBVIOUSLY, I DON'' T THINK WE CONTAINER. WE ' LL CERTAINLY BRING IT.
ONWARD. THE MINISTER, AN ORDER IN COUNCIL, I BELIEVE, ISRAELIS TEAR.
IS THE RIGHT TERM, CAN ACTUALLY.
DO SOMETHING OUT OF SYNC WITH THE REMAINDER OF IT, BUT THAT ALSO.
BECOMES HARDER. WE CAN CERTAINLY TAKE A LOOK AT IT. THE LARGE PROBLEM, IN TERMS OF.
COST, AS YOUR PRAISE HAS.
POINTED OUT IS THE DEMAND UNDER ALL BRAND-NEW BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION CURRENTLY.
FOR SECONDARY SUITES, TO PROVIDE.
A DIFFERENT HOME HEATING SYSTEM. WE MAY HAVE THE ABILITY TO GET AN.
AGREEMENT WITH THE PROVINCE, AS.
YOUR PRAISE HAS MENTIONED THAT A ROOM HEATING UNIT IS THE MATCHING.
WE'' RE TALKING TO THE PROVINCE
. > > O.K.. YOU RECOGNIZE, THAT– YOU RESPONDED TO– REALLY TWO.
QUESTIONNESS ONE THERE, WITH HOW.
LONG, A VERY LONG TIME IS THE RIGHT RESPONSE AND WHEN'' S THE CUTOFF.
DAY AND THAT'' S THE 15th OF.
APRIL THIS YEAR.I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT THROUGH.
NORTHERN COUNCIL THINGS CANISTER.
HAPPEN, I ALWAYS FEAR WHEN THAT OCCURS DUE TO THE FACT THAT VERY OFTEN, LIKE.
OUR POLITICAL ELECTION EXPENDITURE AND THINGS,.
THEY'' RE NOT REALLY ENTIRELY BAKED WHEN THEY SURVIVE THERE. SO IT'' S A LITTLE A CONCERN. IF YOU COULD ADD SOMETHING ELSE TO THE LISTING, Mr. WATSON, TO.
THE SPACE HEATING UNIT, I JUST HAD AN.
APPLICATION FOR A SECONDARY SUITE IN OUR ONE DISTRICT CROSS.
MY WORKDESK TODAY. THE INTERESTING POINT ABOUT IT WAS THAT, TO OBTAIN TO THE.
MECHANICAL AREA, YOU NEEDED TO GO.
GO THROUGH THE FULL SIZE OF THE SUITE. WHICH STRUCK ME AS BEING A.
BIT ODD, PARTICULARLY– AMID– YOU RECOGNIZE, THAT WAS BETWEEN WHERE.
INDIVIDUAL WERE LIVING AND THE.
WAY OUT OF THE HOUSE, I MIGHT ADD TOO. IT'' S A BIT OF AN INTERESTING.
ALDERMAN CARRA, AND I AGREE,.
THIS IS AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT, I HAVE NO DIFFICULTY SUSTAINING.
THIS, BUT QUITE TRUTHFULLY, WE'' RE. PROBABLY LOOKING AT 18 MONTHS, CAUTIOUSLY, UNTIL WE HAVE.
SOMETHING MATERIAL IN OUR HANDS.
TO FUNCTION WITH.BUT YOU ' VE GOT TO BEGIN'.
SOMEPLACE. THANKS. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: YES,.
ALDERMAN MacLEOD.
>> > > MANY THANKS, YOUR PRAISE. I WILL BE BRIEF ON THIS. I THINK THIS IS ANOTHER AMONG.
THOSE OBSTACLES TO CREATING SAFE AND AFFORDABLE COLLECTIONS, AND ALSO I.
THINK THAT THE PROVINCE HAS.
COMMITTED THEMSELVES TO THE TEN-YEAR PLAN. THIS IS A PIECE OF THAT PROBLEM,.
AND ALSO I THINK IT NEEDS TO BE SUPPORTED FOR THAT AS WELL AS LOTS OF.
OTHER REASONS. I ASSUME THAT THE CODE, WITH REGARD TO SECONDARY SUITES, IS.
SOMETHING THAT ACTUALLY PREVENTS.
PEOPLE– IT MOTIVATES PEOPLE NOT TO OBTAIN THEM LEGALIZED, I.
ASSUMPTION, IS WHAT I AM TRYING TO.
SAY. THANKS.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU QUITE. ALDERMAN PROVIDER?
>> > > THANKS, YOUR PRAYER. I WAS SIMPLY EXAMINING THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE 2006.
REPORT OF THE PROVINCE, AND ALSO.
BASICALLY, WHAT WE'' RE BEING ASKED TO PERFORM RIGHT HERE IS COVERED IN.
THOSE SUGGESTIONS. I INDICATE, THEY DO TALK A GREAT DEAL ABOUT THE EXPENSE, THE NUMBER ONE.
SUGGESTION WAS CRITERIA FOR.
SECONDARY SUITES SHOULD BE DEVELOPED FOR USAGE IN SINGLE.
FAMILY MEMBERS HOMES TO ADDRESS THE REQUIREMENT.
TO SAFETY AND ALSO PRICE, AS WELL AS THEY HAVE A BUNCH OF NUMBERS.
AROUND THAT. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO ESTABLISH DISTRICT WIDE STANDARDS FOR.
SECONDARY SUITES UNDER THE.
ALBERTA STRUCTURE AS WELL AS FIRE CODES, AS WELL AS REMAIN TO HAVE SELECTION TO.
IDENTIFY IN WHICH THESE SUITES.
MUST BE PERMITTED.STANDARDS FOR SECONDARY SUITES. SHOULD PUT ON BOTH NEW AS WELL AS.
EXISTING HOUSES, AND THERE ' S OTHERS. I GUESS WHAT I WOULD RATHER SEE,.
Mr. WATSON, IS TO HAVE YOU SCOPE OUT WHAT THIS ITEM OF.
WORK WOULD ENTAIL. DUE TO THE FACT THAT IF YOU WEAR'' T HAVE THE RESOURCES IN ORDER TO ACCOMPLISH THIS,.
SOMETHING HAS TO COME OFF THE.
TABLE, IN ORDER FOR US TO UNDERTAKE THIS WORK. I ASSUME IT'' S ESSENTIAL WORK, BUT.
WHAT YOU COULD DO WOULD BE TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE RECOMMENDATIONS AS.
THEY WERE AUTHORIZED BY THE.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN '' 06 AND ALSO CONSIDER THAT FIVE-YEAR DURATION ON WHERE.
WE HAVE COME SINCE THOSE.
REFERRALS WERE MADE. MY QUESTION TO YOU IS IF.
WE– IF WE WERE TO REFER THIS.
AND ALSO HAVE YOU RETURN IN A WEEK OR TWO TO SCOPE THIS OUT, WITH.
THE RESOURCES THAT WOULD BE.
REQUIRED, TO DO THIS FUNCTION, ESPECIALLY IF IT'' S GOING TO TAKE. 18 MONTHS, I DON'' T KNOW HOW LONG. > >'THANK YOU.I DON ' T THINK THE REAL QUANTITY.
THAT LARGE, WITH RESPECT. THE EFFORT IS EVEN MORE THE.
DISCUSSIONS WITH THE DISTRICT,.
THAN THE ARRANGEMENTS TO GET INDIVIDUALS ON SIDE TO ASSISTANCE IT. BOTH WITHIN THE BUILDING.
MARKET, ONCE AGAIN, I DON'' T THINK THAT SHOULD BE A BIG PROBLEM. I AM NOT AS CONCERNED
REGARDING THE–. WE HAVE PEOPLE IN STRUCTURE GUIDELINES NOW, THEIR TASK IS TO.
CONSIDER THE CODE AS WELL AS MAKE.
MODIFICATIONS CONSTANTLY AND ALSO IDENTIFY HOW TO RELOCATE AHEAD, AS WELL AS.
YOU ARE DEAD-ON, BASED.
ON THE WORK THAT WAS USED UP 2006, THERE'' S A GREAT DEAL OF WORK. ALREADY– PREPARATORY WORK.
ALREADY DONE THAT WE CAN RESTORE UP AGAIN AND ALSO TAKE A LOOK AT. SO IT'' S NOT SO MUCH GETTING IT
. READY TO GO, IT'' S MORE REGARDING GETTING IT OVER THE GOAL LINE.
WITH THE PROVINCE, THAT TAKES A.
A LOT LONGER PROCESS.SO I APPRECIATE THAT. I AM PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE MORE. TROUBLES ON THE ENFORCEMENT SIDE THAN ON MAKING CODE CHANGES IN. TERMS OF TEAM AS WELL AS
RESOURCES. > > AND THIS DOESN ' T TALK AT ALL TO SEEKING ADVICE FROM ANYONE. THIS ITEM. > > WELL, NO, THESE BECOME REALLY TECHNOLOGICAL ISSUES THAT THERE ARE. CODE SPECIALISTS, AND THIS IS.
LESS OF A CONSULTATIONAL PROCEDURE THAN IT IS ENSURING THAT WE. WORK WITH WITH OUR PARTNERS IN.
> > THANK YOU. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK. > > YEAH.
PONDER WHAT PRECEDES. I HOPE YOU SUSTAIN THIS. CLOSED.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:. MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN CARRA. ON THIS SUGGESTION ARE WE.
EXTREMELY WELL, THEN, ALDERMAN CARRA? AND ALSO I MEAN I THINK THE ONE POINT.
THAT I HEARD THAT ISN ' T CONSISTED OF IN THE STAYING 2'. MOVEMENTS IS THE POTENTIAL FOR.
NEIGHBORHOOD CONSULTATION.
AND I DID SAY IN MY OPENING. ADDRESS THAT I BELIEVE THAT WE.
NEED TO OBTAIN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD PREPARATION PROCESSES TO THE NEXT. LEVEL. IN THE SPIRIT OF RESOLVING THE RIGHT-MINDED PROBLEMS, WHICH ARE. HAVING PRICE, WHICH ARE
. COMPETITION OF CALGARY AS WE ENTER AN FINANCIAL UPTURN,. POSITIVE RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY CIVIL LIBERTIES AS.
OPPOSED TO DOWNSIDE PROPERTY CIVIL LIBERTIES, THE REALITY THAT PEOPLE. THEIR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY RATHER THAN SAY WHAT OTHER PEOPLE CANISTER DO ON.
SURROUNDING THEM.I AM GOING TO RELOCATE
2 AND ALSO 3, TO.

DIRECTING MANAGEMENT TO.
PREPARE A BYLAW AMENDMENT THAT ENABLES SECONDARY SUITES IN. CONNECTED AS WELL AS SEPARATED FORMS TO.
BE DISCUSHIONNARY AREAS.
WITHIN A 2.5-KILOMETER SPANS OF. MOUNT ROYAL UNIVERSITY
, ACADEMY,.
BOW VALLEY COLLEGE AS WELL AS THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY AND ALSO NUMBER.
3 DIRECT ADMINISTRATION TO.
PREPARE A BYLAW MODIFICATION THAT ENABLES SECONDARY SUITES.
CONNECTED AND ALSO DETACHED TYPES, TO.
BE A DISCRETIONARY USAGE IN ALL AREAS CURRENTLY ZONED R 1,.
RC 1 AND ALSO RC 1-L WITHIN.
400 METERS OF AN LRT STATION OR BRT STATUS.
>> > > I ENCOURAGE THE ARGUMENT.
BORDERING THIS TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN THE.
PRINCIPLE CONCERNS AS WELL AS THE.
TECHNOLOGICAL PROBLEMS, BECAUSE THAT'' S REALLY THE CORE OF THE ISSUE.> > > DO YOU REQUIRED A SECONDER,.
ALDERMAN CARRA.

>> > > IS ANYONE READY TO SECOND.
THIS?
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN MacLEOD. ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE IT ON THE.
TABLE AND WE WILL VOTE. I AM NOT EVEN GOING TO ASK YOU. WE WILL CERTAINLY ELECT ON THEM SEPARATELY. ALDERMAN POOTMANS. >> > > MANY THANKS, YOUR PRAISE. I BELIEVE IN THE PETER OF PREVIOUS.
2 ACTIVITIES AGO, WHERE WE PASSED A REFERENCE TO MANAGEMENT FOR.
MORE WORK WITH THIS TOPIC, IN.
THE KEEN FEELING FROM MY PERSPECTIVE OF WANTING TO LEARN HOW.
SECONDARY SUITES CANISTER BE ALLOWED.
TO FIND OUT INTO THE OPEN, BECOME SAFE, ADDRESS CAR PARKING.
CONCERNS, AREA OCCUPANCY, EVERY ONE OF.
THESE CONCERNS WHICH I ANTICIPATE MANAGEMENT TO CONSIDER, AND.
FURTHER MORE, IN CHARGE COURSE, A.
FULLY INVOLVED PUBLIC APPOINTMENT AND ALSO FULL PUBLIC.
DISPUTE. I WOULD ANTICIPATE BOTH THE CONCERNS OF NUMBER 2, THAT IS, ALLOWING.
IN A DISCRETIONARY USE IN ALL.
DISTRICTS CURRENTLY ZONED R 1, RC 1, AS WELL AS RC 1-L WITHIN A 2.5.
RADIUS OF WARD 6 MOUNT ROYAL.
COLLEGE, THE HUGE MAJORITY OF THAT FACE WILL BE RC 1. I WOULD ANTICIPATE THAT ISSUE TO.
COME UNDER THE CONSIDERATION OF NUMBER 5, TO PUT IT SIMPLY, I.
WOULD EXPECT ADMINISTRATION TO.
RECORD ON THE EFFECTS OF THAT FOR MORGAN PARTICULARLY.
AS WELL AS I WOULD ASSUME OTHER.
AREA INFLUENCED BY THE DISCRETIONARY USE NOW PERMITTED.
OR TO BE PERMITTED AROUND THE.
OTHER INSTRUCTIONAL ESTABLISHMENTS, SAIT, BOW VALLEY AND ALSO THE.
UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY. SIMILARLY, IN NUMBER 3, DIRECTING ADMINISTRATION,.
PREPARE A LAW AMENDMENT THAT.
PERMITS FOR SECONDARY SUITES THAT ENABLES ATTACHED AND REMOVED.
KINDS IN ALL PRESENTLY ZONED R.
1, RC 1, AND RC 1-L WITHIN 400 METERS OF AN LRT TERMINAL, I.
THINK THAT THE IMPLICATIONS FOR.
A NUMBER OF THE EXISTING LRT STATIONS AND THOSE UNDER.
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION WILL CERTAINLY ADDITIONALLY BE.
AFFECTED AS WELL AS PERHAPS COULD BE SUBJECT THE SOME OF THE.
FUNCTION AS WELL AS STUDY THAT.
MANAGEMENT DOES.SO AS A RESULT

I WILL CERTAINLY NOT BE.
SUSTAINING NUMBER 2 OR NUMBER 3,.
IN ANTICIPATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE RESEARCH STUDY THAT WILL BE.
DONE BY MANAGEMENT. THANKS, YOUR WORSHIP. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU, VERY MUCH ALDERMAN.
> > YEAH, YOUR PRAISE, THOSE ARE. GOOD'COMMENTS, BUT THERE ' S SIMPLY ONE ISSUE. IN NUMBER 2 IN THE FIRST 3 WE ' RE.
DIRECTION, ASIDE FROM A LAND USE APPLICATION THAT WILL CERTAINLY FLY FORTH.
EVENTUALLY, PROBABLY.
SOONER, TO THE DIFFERENT NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS AND ALSO THE RESPONSIBILITY.
MAY BE ON THE CITY, MAY BE ON.
THE ORGANIZATION, OR OTHER ORGANIZED GROUPS, OR OTHERWISE SO.
ORGANIZED GROUPS TO HOLD SOME.
PUBLIC CONVERSATION CONCERNING IT. SO IF ALDERMAN POOTMANS, IF YOU.
HAD RECOMMENDED THAT THERE BE A.
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT EXERCISE ATTACHED TO NUMBER 2, AND ALSO IN.
FACT TO NUMBER 3 ALSO,.
DUE TO THE FACT THAT THAT INFLUENCES A GREAT DEAL OF AREAS IN THE CITY, GIVEN THAT BR.
IT'' S ARE MUCH MORE EXTENSIVE. SYSTEM THAN IT USED TO BE, THEN YOU NEED TO ALLOW THE.
ADMINISTRATION YOU EXPECT A FULL.
PUBLIC INTERACTION PROCEDURE JUST AS A PRIVATE BUSINESS, A PRIVATE.
PROGRAMMER WOULD DO WITH THE LAND.
USAGE APPLICATION.THIS IS WHAT THIS IS. ONLY IT INFLUENCES LOTS, LOTS OF, LOTS OF.
EVEN MORE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL AREAS, RESIDENTIAL IS THE PROBLEM.
HERE, NATURALLY, THAN ANY.
PRIVATE– PRIVATE LAND USAGE, PRIVATE DESIGNER'' S APPLICATION.
MAY– WOULD EVER DO. SO I AM NOT GOING TO BE SUPPORTING 2 AND ALSO 3 AS THEY STAND.
EITHER, UNLESS SOMEONE CAN.
SPECIFY An EXCELLENT PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS THAT GOES WITH IT,.
OTHERWISE, WE'' RE LEAVING Mr. WATSON AND HIS PERSONNEL HANGING OUT TO DRY.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
ALDERMAN PINCOTT.

>> > > MANY THANKS. QUESTION FOR Mr. WATSON AROUND.
400 METERS. WHEN WE'' VE DISCUSSED STROLL.
DISTANCES AND ALSO STROLLING DISTANCES,.
HAS IT NOT TYPICALLY BEEN A 500-METER SPANS THAT WE TALK.
> > I GUARANTEE THE CHAIR THERE ' S NOT A WHOLE LOT OF SCIENCE IN THIS. THERE'' S BEEN, OVER THE LAST YEAR.
CHOSE TO BE 400 METERS. 400 METERS IS, WHAT
, ABOUT CONCERNINGFIFTY PERCENT > > 400 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CALGARY TRANSPORTATION PLAN,.
IF YOU, which IS WHY I ASSUME THAT.
ARE SEARCHING FOR A NUMBER, 400'' S NOT AN UNREASONABLE NUMBER IN.
TERMS OF– AND ALSO HE UNDOUBTEDLY,.
THE MAGIC AROUND ALL THESE THINGS IS, NATURALLY, AS YOU GO.
FURTHER, THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE.
READY TO STROLL DECLINES OFF AND WHETHER OR NOT THERE'' S. CONNECTION IN THE WALKWAYS.
AS WELL AS SO ON.PICK 500

, CHOICE 600, I MEAN,.
IT … MAKE THE CIRCLE BIGGER. >> > > OKAY, I SIMPLY INTENDED TO CHECK.
DUE TO THE FACT THAT I WASN'' T CERTAIN WHEN THE. 400 WAS CONSISTENT. YOUR PRAISE I WOULD IN FACT. LIKE TO AT THIS MOMENT SUGGEST AN. CHANGE. THANKS.
MY AMENDMENT WILL CERTAINLY BE IN NUMBER.
“3. WOULD BE TO TAKE THE WORD.
> > THAT IS MY CHANGE. > > I ASSUME I DID. > > SO I LOCATE THAT– THANK YOU, ALDERMAN MacLEOD, VALIANT.
EFFORT. YOU RECOGNIZE, WE SPEAK ABOUT CONCENTRATING– AND ALSO BEGINNING TO.
CHECK OUT HOW WE USE,.
MAKE MAXIMUMMAL USE OF OUR TRANSIT NOTES, AS WELL AS TO MAKE.
SECONDARY SUITES PERMITTED USAGE.
AROUND OUR TRANSIT NOTES, SEEMS TO ME TO BE VIRTUALLY THE.
AREA YOU INTENDED TO START. URBAN CSA, IN 2015 OFFERED An EXCELLENT REPORT TO COUNCIL ON.
EXACTLY HOW YOU COULD BEGIN WITH.
ALLOWED USE, SECONDARY SUITES, 400 METERS AROUND– AROUND LRT.
TERMINALS. AND HOW THAT WOULD OFFER THE STUDENT POPULATION, AND HOW THAT.
WOULD ACTUALLY BE– ALLOW United States TO.
MAXIMIZE THAT AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE FOR A POPULATION THAT IS.
UNDER-SERVED. SO I JUST– YOU RECOGNIZE, AGAIN, I FIND IT LETTING DOWN THAT WE'' RE. BELOW, ONCE MORE, CHATTING ABOUT.
DISCRETIONARY USE.BOY, IF WE WERE BOTHERED WITH,.
YOU KNOW, WORKLOADED SDAB, I–.
I WILL, ONCE MORE, AS I CLAIMED ORIGINALLY, I WILL SUSTAIN THIS. AGAIN, MY DISAPPOINTMENT IS.
BECAUSE IT IS BIT-BY-BIT, AND ALSO I– AS WELL AS I DO DREAM THAT AT THE.
EXTREMELY LEAST WE COULD HAVE HAD.
SECONDARY SUITES BE An ALLOWED USAGE AROUND THE ONE LOCATION THAT.
THEY NEEDS TO BE TO START WITH.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: ALDERMAN PINCOTT YOUR REMARKABLE.
POWERS OF PERSUASION GET ON.
DISPLAY YET ONCE MORE SINCE YOU SIMPLY OBTAINED YOUR SELF A SECONDER.
>> > > THANKS
>>. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: SO WE HAVE– WE HAVE AN MODIFICATION ON.
THE FLOORING, TO CHANGE WORDS–.
IT WAS SIMPLY NUMBER 3? NOT NUMBER 2. OKAY. TO MODIFICATION THE WORD “” DISCRETIONARY”” TO “” PERMITTED””.
IN NUMBER 3 ON THE MODIFICATION,.
SIMPLY WAVE YOUR HAND IF YOU WANT TO SPEAK ON THE CHANGE. ALDERMAN CHABOT.
>> > > YOUR WORSHIP, I AM SIMPLY WONDERING WHETHER OR NOT WE.
SHOULDN'' T ACTION AN AMENDMENT TO. THE AMENDMENT.ON THE BASIS OF THAT WE'' RE. MOVING INTO A COMPLETELY NEW.
LAND USAGE LOCATION, DISCRETIONARY IS ONE STEP. THIS IS TAKING TWO ACTIONS. AS WELL AS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THAT, I ASSUME PUBLIC CONSULTIVE PROCEDURE IS.
DEFINITELY ESSENTIAL IN ORDER TO.
MOVE INTO THIS PERMITTED USAGE AS AGAINST DISCRETIONARY. DISCRETIONARY IS SOMETHING AND I.
RECOMMEND BELIEVING BEYOND PACKAGE, BUT NOW, WE NEED.
TO FIRST THINK INSIDE THE BOX.
PRIOR TO WE BEGIN ASSUMING OUTSIDE THE BOX. THEREFORE THAT'' S WHY I AM GOING TO. SUGGEST THAT WE INCLUDE IN THAT MOVEMENT, FOLLOWING A PUBLIC.
INTERACTION PROCESS.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: HOLD ON, ALDERMAN CHABOT. THE IMPACT OF WHAT YOU'' RE. SUGGESTING WOULD BE THAT NO MATTER THE OUTCOMES OF THE.
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT, THEY WOULD.
STILL COME BACK WITH A BYLAW CHANGE PRODUCTION THAT ADJUSTMENT. IS THAT YOUR INTENT? OR WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE THEM GO THINK OF IT AND THEN COME.
BACK POSSIBLY WITH A BYLAW.
AMENDMENT? >> > > IT WOULD POSSIBLY BE.
PREFERRED THE OTHER METHOD.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: SO WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST IS THE.
IF THE ACTIVITY PASSES, THERE'' S NO FACTOR BECAUSE THEY
WOULD HAVE. COME BACK WITH THAT ANYWAYS. IF THE MOVEMENT FAILS, I WILL IDENTIFY YOU, AND ALSO YOU CAN PUT A.
NEW MOTION ACTIVITY SAYS GO DO.
> > IF IT STOPS WORKING. > > POINT OF ORDER.
MODIFICATION TO AN AMENDMENT. ANYHOW. > > IT ' S NOT, WE ' RE
>> ONLY AT TWO.
>>> > > THIS IS ALL CHANGES.

>> > > > NO, THIS IS MOVEMENTS> OCCURRING. > > ALL NEW ACTIVITIES. >> > > YEAH. THESE ARE MOVEMENTS. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: SO. WHAT DO YOU THINK, ALDERMAN.
CHABOT? IT'' S NOT AN CHANGE TO AN.
AMENDMENT TO >> AN AMEND THE, SIMPLY.
AN CHANGE. IF, > > SO YOU ARE SUGGEST THAT.
THIS FALLS SHORT THAT I OUGHT TO BRING. ONWARD AN ALTERNATE MOTION THAT CLAIMS–.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
I AM NOT since THE CHALLENGE BELOW– I SUGGEST YOU CONTAINER DO IT.
GOING TO POLICY IT OUT OF WHACK,.
BUT THE CHALLENGE IS THE METHOD IT'' S DOING NOW,
WE ' RE DOING. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT BUT THEY HAVE.
ONLY ONE OPTION AT THE END OF PUBLIC INTERACTION WHICH IS TO.
ADVANCING THE LAWS AND IT.
APPEARS A LITTLE BIT DISINGENUOUS TO PERFORM THAT.
>> > > OKAY, I WILL CERTAINLY STAND DOWN,.
THANKS FOR THAT SUGGESTIONS.

>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN CHABOT. ANY INDIVIDUAL ELSE ON THE MODIFICATION? JUST WAVE.

> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I TIN ABSOLUTELY FILL COUNCIL IN ON MY
> > THAT ' S BETTER, YEAH.
> > AND THIS DOESN ' T TALK AT ALL TO CONSULTING WITH ANY PERSON. > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK. > > THANK YOU.ALDERMAN LOWE?
>> > > WELL, YOUR WORSHIP, I HAD, IN ANTICIPATION OF NUMBER 5,
FAILING TWICE, CREATE A.
MOTION WHICH RESOLVED THE PROBLEM OF AREA BY NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC.
INVOLVEMENT TO DO THE RESEARCH,.
TO ESTABLISH THAT Mr. WATSON IS … TO ACCOMPLISH THE RESEARCH THAT– WOULD.
PROVIDE THE CHOICES OF GOING THIS COURSE. THAT FAILED, AS WELL AS I AM STILL.
SITTING RIGHT HERE LOOKING AT THE LANGUAGE, BECAUSE I ROLLED INTO.
CONCERNS CONCERNING SECURITY OF.
COLLECTIONS AS WELL AS AREA DETERMINED SAFETY AND SECURITY ISSUES AROUND SUITES. AND THERE ARE LOTS OF. AS WELL AS THEY ARE RECOGNIZED BY THE AREAS, WHETHER OR NOT WE.
AGREE THERE, THEY ARE SAFETY.
ISSUES OR OTHERWISE, EVERY LITTLE THING, YOU KNOW, UNDERSTANDING, FACT IN.
THESE CASES. SO I AM NOT WITHOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD BY COMMUNITY FACTOR.
APPOINTMENT. I BELIEVE ALDERMAN POOTMANS, YOU CLAIMED THIS– THIS STRIKES, WHAT, 4.
IT WILL HIT FOUR IN MINE.AND WHAT WE ' RE DOING IS. INTENDING COMMISSION IN WHICH WE ' VE PUT IN R 1 F INTO An AREA. AND I CAN ' T SUPPORT THAT.
CONCEPT, AS ALDERMAN CARRA.
SAYS, THE CONCEPT– THE RIGHT-MINDED PRODUCT CONCERNS AROUND.
THIS, AFTER THAT YOU HAD BETTER TALK.
TO THE INDIVIDUALS. if YOU WANT ENORMOUS PUSH BACK.
ACCOMPLISH THIS. AS WELL AS I, FOR ONE, AM NOT CURIOUS ABOUT A PRESS BACK. I ASSUME IF WE TECHNIQUE THIS.
PROPERLY, THERE'' S AN CHANCE TO HAVE SOME APPROVAL. BUT THIS WILL CERTAINLY ASSURE THAT.
WON'' T OCCUR. I WON'' T ASSISTANCE 2 OR 3.> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: OR THE.
> > DOING IT ALL AT AS SOON AS, YOUR.
> > SO'IT ' S A QUESTION OF HOW YOU. GO ABOUT THIS, IF YOU WANT COMMUNITY GET IN OR NOT. THIS WILL CERTAINLY NOT OBTAIN AREA.
BUY-IN, AND ALSO UNLESS YOU TALK TO INDIVIDUALS ABOUT IT, YOU'' RE
NOT. GOING TO OBTAIN AREA BUY-IN. ALDERMAN HODGES IS EXACTLY RIGHT. THIS IS EXACTLY LIKE THE LAND.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: TO THE. > > YEAH, I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT.
THE QUARTER MILE WALK, IT ' S, YOU.
KNOW, A TIME-HONOURED ACROSS.
HUMAN BEING MEASUREMENT A LOT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS TYPE OF FIT.
WITHIN THAT 400-METER DISTANCE.
SETTLEMENT PATTERN AS WELL AS IT'' S BEEN PROVEN INDIVIDUAL WILL STROLL 5.
MINUTES TO CATCH THE BUS,.
SUPPLIED THEY'' RE STROLLING THROUGH ATMOSPHERES THAT ARE SOMEWHAT.
ENJOYABLE TO STROLL THROUGH. PEOPLE WILL CERTAINLY STROLL 800 METERS TO CATCH PREMIUM QUALITY TRAIN.
SOLUTION, OFFERED THEY'' RE. GOING THROUGH A TOP QUALITY PEDESTRIAN ATMOSPHERE. THESE ARE QUANTITATIVELY.
ESTABLISHED INFORMATION AS WELL AS BEST PRACTICES FOR THIRTY YEARS FOR URBAN.
DIVIDE. SO THAT'' S WHERE THOSE NUMBERS ORIGINATE FROM.
AS WELL AS I ' M SAYING I DID NOT MAKE– I THOUGHT An INFANT STEP.
OF DISCRETIONARY USAGE WAS THE. VERY LEAST THAT WE MUST PROPERLY TACKLE AS INDIVIDUALS. WHO STAND FOR A MUNICIPAL.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT WAS GONE BY COUNCIL WHICH WAS.
THE OUTCOME OF EXHAUSTIVE.
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT WITH THE CITIZENS OF CALGARY. THIS IS A RUBBER PINCHED HIT THE.
ROAD POINT.I ' D MORE THAN HAPPY TO SUPPORT IT.
SINCE I BELIEVE IT'' S THE VERY. LEAST WE CANISTER–'I ASSUME IT ' S HMM THE REALLY THE VERY LEAST WE CAN DO,. DISCRETIONARY USE IS THE
REALLY. LEAST WE CONTAINER DO,'SO I ' LL> SUPPORT THIS.
> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANK. YOU SIGNIFICANTLY, ALDERMAN CARRA.
>> ON THE AMENDMENT,'ALDERMAN.( INDISCERNIBLE ).
> > ON THE CHANGE I '
M A LITTLE CONCERNED BY THE.'FREE-WHEELING SENSE I HAVE. HERE OF HOW WE ' RE CASE THROUGH SOME RATHER MAJOR. PLAN DECISIONS. I HAVE ACTUALLY LISTENED TO EXPERTS INFORM United States AND ALSO AT LPT FOR THAT ISSUE,.
SENSIBLE AS WELL AS SKILLED PLANNERS.
SAY IF WE ARE LOOKING AT DISCRETIONARY– AT SECONDARY.
SUITES, PERIOD, LET'' S LEAVE IT.
AT THAT FOR THE MOMENT.AT SECONDARY SUITES FOR. SOLUTIONS FOR THICKNESS AROUND. LRT AS WELL AS VRT STATIONS, WE ' VE REALLY MISSED'THE MARK. THESE ARE NOT IDENTITY. REMEDIES.
I ' VE HEARD MY PRECIOUS COLLEAGUES.
THIS EVENING SAY THAT THIS IS.
AN AFFORDABILITY ISSUE, AS WELL AS I'' M NOT SO SURE'IT ' S THAT. EITHER.
THAT.BUT I ' M UNCERTAIN THAT ' S THE. POLICY EITHER.
I ' M ACQUAINTED WITH THE MDP AND ALSO OTHER DOCUMENTS. THERE ARE A HOST OF PEOPLE.
AS THEY GO RIGHT INTO ESTABLISHED AREAS, WE '
RE PUBLICLYOPENLY WE ' RE RUSHING HEADLONG RIGHT INTO THIS WITHOUT EVEN A HEADS UP.
TO SEVERAL OF OUR COMMUNITIES THAT.
HAVE A BETTER I ASSUME THAT LONG THIS MAY BE ON THE.
HORIZON AND ALSO ALL OF A SUDDEN.
WE'' RE ENTERTAINING AN CHANGE TO SUGGEST PERMITTED.
USE IN THESE AREAS. THIS IS SEVERAL ACTIONS PAST WHAT I THINK THE NEIGHBORHOODS.
AS WELL AS CERTAINLY MYSELF ARE.
COMFY WITH. ON THAT BASIS I WILL CERTAINLY NOT BE.
SUSTAINING THE AMENDMENT. MURMUR >> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANK.
YOU, QUANTITY POOTMANS. ANYONE ELSE ON THE AMENDMENT? ALDERMAN PINCOTT, DO YOU WANT.
TO CLOSE?
>> > > GRAB ONE WORD THAT ALDERMAN POOTMANS STATED AND ALSO HE SAID.
“” REQUIRE””. WE'' RE NOT FORCING ANYTHING.WE ' RE

NOT FORCING ANY PERSON TO. DO ANYTHING. WE'' RE PHRASE THAT WITHIN A DISTANCE, WITHIN AN LOCATION, THAT. MAKES SENSE FROM OUR MDP ' S. POINT OF VIEW, THAT MAKES FEELING IF WE WISH TO CHECK OUT THE.
INEXPENSIVE ELEMENT TO.
TAKE FULL ADVANTAGE OF AFFORDABILITY, WE ARE OFFERING YOU, THE PROPERTY OWNER, THE.
CHOICE TO PERFORM THIS. WE'' RE PERMITTING YOU TO PERFORM SOMETHING WITH YOUR RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. WE'' RE NOT FORCING ANYBODY TO
. DO ANYTHING. IF WE ARE, as well as I BELIEVE THAT
. GOING TO START SOMEWHERE WITH.
ALLOWED USAGE, WHICH, AS WE– ANYBODY THAT HAS LOOKED AT THIS,.
OTHER TOWNS, OTHER.
JURISDICTIONS IN CANADA, PERMITTED USE IS WHERE ALMOST.
EVERYBODY REACHES. IT'' S IN WHICH– IT ' S WHAT YOU DO.
THEN THIS IS THE PLACE TO. BEGIN IS EXACTLY AROUND LRT AS WELL AS VRT STATIONS.
EXACTLY AROUND THOSE MASS.

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION HUBS.SO WE ' RE NOT FORCING ANY PERSON. TO ACCOMPLISH ANYTHING. WITH THIS CHANGE, WHAT WE'' RE SAYING IS'WE ' RE.
GIVING– WE ' RE ALLOWING. PEOPLE TO DO MATTERS IF THEY CHOOSE. WE'' RE NOT FORCING ANY.
AREA TO CHANGE, ANYONE TO CHANGE. I HOPE YOU DO ASSISTANCE THIS.
AMENDMENT. IF WE WANT TO, I BELIEVE IT IS–.
BE INCREMENTAL, LET United States BE.
INCREMENTAL. LET United States BE INCREMENTAL TOWARDS.
WHERE WE KNOW WE DEMAND TO GET.
TO, WHICH IS PERMITTED USE FOR SECONDARY SUITES. AS WELL AS LET'' S BEGINNING AROUND THE.
LOCATION THAT IT MAKES THE THE MAJORITY OF FEELING.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: ON THE.
CHANGE, SHUT ON THE MODIFICATION.
>> > > TAPE-RECORDED VOTE ON THE.
AMENDMENT, YOUR PRAISE, PLEASE.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: OK. ON THE MODIFICATION, THE CHANGE IS SIMPLY TO ADJUSTMENT.
WORDS DISCRETIONARY TO.
PERMITTED.THAT ' S THE ONLY THING WE ' RE. VOTING ON NOW.
IN NUMBER 3, ADJUSTMENT THE WORD DISCRETIONARY TO PERMITTED IN.
NUMBER 3.
>> > > ON THE RECORDED BALLOT, ALDERMAN HODGES AGAINST,.
ALDERMAN FARRELL FOR, ALDERMAN.
CARRA FOR, ALDERMAN COLLEY-URQUHART AGAINST,.
ALDERMAN CHABOT AGAINST,.
ALDERMAN DEMONG AGAINST, ALDERMAN MacLEOD FOR, ALDERMAN.
LOWE AGAINST, ALDERMAN.
POOTMANS AGAINST, ALDERMAN STEVENSON AGAINST, ALDERMANMAN.
JONES AGAINST, ALDERMAN.
PINCOTT FOR, (INDISCERNIBLE) AGAINST.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANK.
YOU. BACK TO THE MOVEMENT ON THE.
FLOOR WHICH IS NUMBER 2 AND ALSO.
NUMBER 3 ON YOUR DISPLAY. I ASSUME YOU ALREADY SPOKEN ON.
THIS– NO, YOU HAVEN'' T,. ALDERMAN LOWE, YOU ONLY TALKED ON THE CHANGE.
> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: I UNDERSTAND, BUT HE STILL HAS THE. ALDERMAN POOTMANS, YOU '
VE ALREADY SPOKEN ON THE MAINKEY > > I DON'' T KNOW IF YOU ' RE.
I WOULD LIKE NOT TO HAVE THE. BRT DETAILED AS THERE, MOST LAY TRANSITIONAL STAGE AT THIS.
POINT.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: SO MY METHOD ON THIS SET, ALDERMAN.
DEMONG, DESPITE THE FACT THAT ALDERMAN.
CHABOT WILL STATE IT'' S NOT IN THE PROCEDURE BYLAW, MY.
PRACTICE IS TO ASK THE MOVING COMPANY.
AND ALSO SECONDLY FER THEY FIND IT CONTRARY. SO ALDERMAN DEMONG IS.
SUGGESTING AN CHANGE– I'' M NOT ASKING YOU TO ELECT YEA OR.
NAY. HE'' S READY TO ELIMINATE OR BRT FROM NUMBER 3 TO SO ALDERMAN.
CARRA AS WELL AS ALDERMAN DEMONG,.
WOULD YOU FIND THAT IN CONTRAST TO YOUR MOTION? WE'' LL REFER TO IT AS SEPARATELY. > >> I PREFER THAT. >> > > THAT ' S FINE
>>. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI:'I ' LL.
>> CALL THEM IN 3 AREAS, AFTER THAT.
> > I JUST WANT TO NOTE THAT >> I. THINK THAT BRT– > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI
>>: IN.

YOUR CLOSE.
>> > > IT ' S A POINT>> OF ORDER.I THINK BRT–. > > FACTOR OF'ORDER. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: IT ' S NOT A FACTOR OF ORDER WHATSOEVER. IT WAS A GOOD SHOT, THOUGH.
>> ALDERMAN DEMONG, WE ' LL TELEPHONE CALL THEM SEPARATELY. > > OK.
ADVANCING, WE ARE OBTAINING CLEAR OF– IS IT IS A 2 AND A. FIFTY PERCENT KILOMETRE RADIUS A. REALISTIC AREA TO HAVE THIS AS DISCRETIONARY? IT LOOKS LIKE AN EXTREMELY. LONG MEANS.
THE AMOUNT OF MINUTES IS THAT,. GIAN-CARLO?> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: I WILL INFORM YOU, ALDERMAN DEMONG,.
THAT WE WENT BACK AND ALSO FORTH ON.
THAT NUMBER, AND ALSO I WAS ACTUALLY ASSUMING OF A 3.
MINUTE WALK WHETHER I BELIEVE.
WHEN I THOUGHT THAT THAT WOULD MAKE, that WOULD MAKE SENSE–.
FEELING.
>> > > ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. >> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: ON THE.
MOVEMENT, ALDERMAN CHABOT? I DO SIMPLY WONDER IF YOU'' RE GOING TO MAKE THE SAME.
POINTER ON THIS AS YOU DID.
ON THE PREVIOUS MOVEMENT, IF I WERE TO SUGGEST THAT WE.
PROBABLY WANT TO EMBARK ON A.
CONSULTATIVE PROCEDURE ON– AROUND THIS PROBLEM. SAME PROBLEM? CONSULTATIVE PROCESS, AMOUNTS TO THE SAME POINT? THANKS.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: NOT TRYING TO HEAVY STEAM ROLL YOU,.
ALDERMAN CHABOT, BUT IT IT'' S. COUNCIL ' S WILL CERTAINLY TO JUST MOVE ON THESE DAYS
, THEN THERE ' S. NOT MUCH FACTOR. IF IT ' S NOT COUNCIL ' S WILL,
AFTER THAT I ' LL ACKNOWLEDGE YOU RIGHT. AWAY. AS WELL AS YOU CAN PUT TO MOVE ON ON A VERY BASIC. MOVEMENT, TO DIRECT. MANAGEMENT TO ENGAGE IN A CONSULTATIVE PROCESS AROUND,.
> >– ALDERMAN PINCOTT? > > THANK YOU. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANKS, ALDERMAN PINCOTT.
OVER AND SAID DON ' T YOU DESIRED TO DISPUTE? I ' M COMFORTABLE WITH RELOCATING.
I COMPREHEND THAT COUNCIL HAS. HAD A LITTLE BIT OF A CONVERSATION AROUND THESE, BUT THESE 2. HAVE BEEN ON THE DOCKET,. IF YOU WILL, FOR A LONG TIME.
NUMBER 3 IS VERY MUCH COMPONENT OF.
THAT WE ' VE ALREADY PASSED.NUMBER 2 JUST MAKES FEELING. AS WELL AS YOU REMEMBER THAT ONE OF. THE REASONS THAT I ' VE BEEN RAISING THIS FOR SO VERY LONG.
THINK THAT WE REQUIREMENT TO AFFORD PROTECTIONS TO THE INDIVIDUALS THAT. ARE STAYING IN THE ILLEGAL.
APPROACH, I BELIEVE IT WAS ALDERMAN DEMONG. WE HAVE RIGHT NOW IS
WE HAVE NO CARROT. AS WELL AS THE STICK WE HAVE TO USE IS THE SAME STICK FOR.
EVERYBODY. ALDERMAN CHABOT AND I WERE SPEAKING OUT OVER SUPPER AND.
WE WERE SAYING THAT IN THE.
AREA IN WHICH HE LIVES AS WELL AS IN WHICH I EXPANDED UP,.
THE MAJORITY OF THE PROHIBITED SUITES ARE.
FINE.THEY '

RE DECENT PLACES TO LIVE. IN OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS,.
THEY'' RE NOT. IN OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS IN HIS.
WARD THEY'' RE NOT. AND I WOULD AGREE WITH THAT. THE ISSUE IS RIGHT NOW THAT.
WE ONLY HAVE THE CAPACITY TO.
TREAT THEM EXACTLY THE SAME. THE REAL FIRE PIT VERSUS THE.
ACTUALLY COMPLETELY SUITABLE PLACE.
TO COPE WITH THE RESPECTABLE PROPRIETOR. WHAT THIS ENABLES US TO PERFORM IN.
THOSE AREAS PARTICULARLY AROUND THE COLLEGES WHERE.
WE KNOW THERE ARE LARGE.
FOCUS OF ILLEGAL SUITES IS IT ACTUALLY SUPPLIES.
BECAUSE THEN, United States WITH A CARROT.
WE CAN MOST LIKELY TO THE PROPERTY OWNER AND ALSO SAY THIS IS WHAT YOU NEED TO.
RELOCATE TO COMPLIANCE RATHER.
OF SAYING TAKE THOSE– KICK THOSE PUPILS OUT. THAT'' S REALLY WHAT THIS IS ALL. ABOUT.
AND I WOULD–
I WOULD. UNDERSTAND CERTAINLY IF. COUNCIL WANTED TO THINK MORE REGARDING THIS SET BUT I BELIEVE WE'. THOUGHT THROUGH THIS QUITE.
WELL. WE ' VE HAD SOME EXCELLENT
INPUT. FROM THE TRAINEES ASSOCIATIONS. OVER THE LAST NUMBER OF YEARS ABOUT THIS ONE. THEY STRONGLY REMAIN IN FAVOUR.
AND ALSO I BELIEVE THAT TODAY WE'' RE. > > THANK YOU. > > I ASK FORGIVENESS.
CLOSED. AFTER THAT RECORDED VOTE ON NUMBER 2.
>> > > ON THE VIDEOTAPED BALLOT,.
ALDERMAN HODGES AGAINST, ALDERMAN FARRELL FOR, ALDERMAN.
CARRA FOR, ALDERMAN.
COLLEY-URQUHART AGAINST, ALDERMAN CHABOT AGAINST,.
ALDERMAN DEMONG AGAINST,.
ALDERMAN MacLEOD FOR, ALDERMAN LOWE AGAINST, ALDERMAN.
POOTMANS AGAINST, ALDERMAN.
STEVENSON AGAINST, ALDERMAN JONES FOR, MAYOR NENSHI FOR,.
REPLACEMENT MAYOR PINCOTT FOR.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANK YOU QUITE. ON NUMBER 2, APPROXIMATELY WORDS.
“” STATIONS””.

LRT STATION. WITHOUT THE LAST THREE.
WORDS. TAPED BALLOT, PLEASE.
>> > > ON THE VIDEOTAPED BALLOT,.
ALDERMAN HODGES AGAINST, ALDERMAN FARRELL FOR, ALDERMAN.
CARRA FOR, ALDERMAN.
COLLEY-URQUHART AGAINST, ALDERMAN CHABOT AGAINST,.
ALDERMAN DEMONG AGAINST,.
ALDERMAN MacLEOD FOR, ALDERMAN LOWE AGAINST, ALDERMAN.
POOTMANS AGAINST, ALDERMAN.
STEVENSON AGAINST, ALDERMAN JONES FOR, MAYOR NENSHI FOR. ACTING MAYOR PINCOTT FOR.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: KEEPING THAT, THERE IS NO FACTOR IN.
VOTING FOR THE LAST ONE.
>> > > WELL, NO, THERE STILL IS. >> > >'IT ' S THEE WORDS NOT HANGING.
> > YOU ' RE ACTUALLY. THEY ACTUALLY DO PRESUME THE.
PRELUDE. ALDERMAN CHABOT. >> > > AS PREDICTED PROBABLY, YOUR.
PRAYER, I HAVE AN ALTERNATE.
SUGGESTED MOVEMENT, WHICH IS– I'' VE GOT IT PARTLY COMPOSED.
OUT WHICH IS DIRECT.
MANAGEMENT TO CARRY OUT A CONSULTATIVE PROCEDURE TO.
CONSIDER REZONING R1, RC 1, RC.
1 L, TO CONSIDER AMENDING THE LAND USAGE LAW TO ADD.
SECONDARY SUITES AS.
DISCRETIONARY USAGE WITHIN 2.5 KILOMETRE RADIUS OF MOUNT.
ROYAL UNIVERSITY, SAIT, BOW.
VALLEY UNIVERSITY, AND COLLEGE OF CALGARY, AND ALSO I QUESTION IF WE.
CANISTER UNDERTAKE A SIMILAR.
DIRECTION FOR REFERRAL NUMBER 3–.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: I.
THINK WHAT WE CANISTER PROBABLY DO, ALDERMAN CHABOT, IS TO DO WHAT.
YOU JUST STATED AS THE.
PRE-AMBLING AND AFTERWARDS SIMPLY REVEAL WHAT CURRENTLY 2 AND 3 IS THE.
POINTS BENEATH. > > YEAH. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: DO YOU.
WANT TO READ IT ONE EVEN MORE TIME, THE PRELUDE.
>> > > DIRECT ADMINISTRATION TO.
CARRY OUT A CONSULTATIVE PROCESS TO CONSIDER REZONING.
R1, RC 1, RC 1 L, TO CONSIDER.
AMENDING THE LAND USE LAW TO ADD SECONDARY SUITES AS A.
DISCRETIONARY USAGE WITHIN 2.5.
KILOMETRE SPANS OF MOUNT ROYAL, UNIVERSITY, S AEUFPLT T,.
BOW VALLEY KHEPBLG, CHECK OUT.
UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY, AND SAME PRELUDE TO ADD SECONDARY.
COLLECTIONS TO DISCRETIONARY USE.
WITHIN 400 METRES OF LRT STATION OR BRT QUITS.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: REALLY.
STYLISH. THANK YOU. SO DO WE HAVE A SECONDER FOR.
THAT, PLEASE? TO ACCOMPLISH A PUBLIC EXAMINATION.
PROCEDURE ON THOSE 2 THINGS. ALDERMAN DEMONG? ALL RIGHT. ANY CONVERSATION ON THIS? ALDERMAN LOWE? >> > >'IT ' S GETTING BETTER. THE GENERAL PUBLIC ASSESSMENT.
PROCESS.I ' D BE

HAPPIER IF IT WAS A.
AREA BY COMMUNITY PUBLIC.
I'' LL PUT THAT AMENDMENT TO. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: I'' M. JUST WAITING UNTIL WE HAVE THE INITIAL MOTION ON THE SCREEN.
AND ALSO AFTER THAT WE'' LL TAKE A LOOK AT YOUR. >> CHANGE,> OKAY. > > SURE. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: NO. TROUBLE. MUSICAL INTERMISSION, ANY INDIVIDUAL? ALDERMAN PINCOTT? LITTLE TUNE AND ALSO DANCE? IF I REALLY WANTED A TUNE AND.
DANCING I WOULD HAVE CALLED.
ALDERMAN CARRA. WHILE WE'' RE WAITING FOR IT TO.
TAKE PLACE THE DISPLAY, ALDERMAN.
LOWE, LET ME JUST, SO I UNDERSTAND, YOUR INTENT IS TO.
DO A NEIGHBORHOOD BY AREA.
APPOINTMENT ON THESE 2 PROBLEMS?
>> > > ON THESE 2 PROBLEMS OF THE.
> > AS WELL AS THE VARIOUS OTHER POINT IS TO. DO THAT WITH A SIGHT TO CREATING ALTERNATIVES. IT WILL CERTAINLY COST A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF MONEY, AND I WOULD.
> > ALSO, YOUR PRAISE– >> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THE.
MONEY WOULD HAVE TO COME.
INDEPENDENTLY SINCE WE DON'' T HAVE REQUISITES OF REFERRAL FOR THE.
> > I VALUE THAT, YOUR WORSHIP. IT'' S FUNCTION THAT COULD
BE. WHILE I'' M STANDING BELOW ON MY.

An INQUIRY IN CONNECTION WITH WE'. SIMPLY SAID THAT WE ' RE GOING TO ACCOMPLISH A BLANKET PLAN AS WELL AS RECORD.
BACK IN DECEMBER. SHOULDN'' T THIS COME EITHER BEFORE OR IN DECEMBER.
IF IT COMES IN, due to the fact that.
FEBRUARY AND ALSO WE'' VE ALREADY MADE A DECISION TO PERFORM IT THE VARIOUS OTHER WAY.
FOREHEAD. > > DO WE HAVE THE WHEREWITHAL.
TO PERFORM THAT?
>> > > WE WILL SET UP THAT OUT OF THE FUND. Mr. WATSON DOESN'' T HAVE THE. MONEY TO ACCOMPLISH IT. I KNOW THAT.
DEVELOPMENT FUND, INNOVATIVE USAGE, INNOVATIVE LAND USAGE. BE CONSIDER IT'THAT WHICH.IF WE ' RE SERIOUS ABOUT IT,
. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: ALDERMAN LOWE, Mr. TOBERT IS.
MURMURING IN MY EAR THAT HE.
WOULD MUCH PREFER TO BE AEULTS BRING A RECORD BACK AND.
DETERMINE WHAT THE PRICE WOULD.
APPEAR LIKE IN TERMS OF MOVING AHEAD.
>> > > THAT ' S EXACTLY WHAT I WOULD.
INTEND TO DO. (INDISCERNIBLE) INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.
DESPITE LOGIC AS WELL AS.
REASON. I HAVE NO PROBLEM ASKING.
Mr. WATSON OR Mr. TOBERT TO.
SCOPE THIS PROJECT AS WELL AS BRING US A BUDGET. HOW QUICKLY CONTAINER DO YOU THAT,.
Mr. TOBERT? >> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: HE.
SAYS AT LEAST A MONTH.
>> > > THEN WE CONTAINER DO THAT A MONTH FROM CURRENTLY. I THINK MY POINT, YOUR PRAYER,.
EXISTS'' S 2 POINTS HERE.COMMUNITY BY COMMUNITY.
EXAMINATION AND ALSO CHOICES FOR.
DOING IT. >> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: I HAVE.
AN IDEA.
>> > > YOU ' RE REFERRING THIS? >> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: I HAVE.
AN CONCEPT. ALDERMAN CHABOT HAS HAD A MOVEMENT ON THE FLOOR TO DIRECT.
MANAGEMENT TO ACCOMPLISH THIS. YOU RIGHT THIS MINUTE, WHILE YOU'' RE STANDING, RATHER THAN.
RELOCATE YOUR CHANGE, COULD SAY.
REFER THIS TO THE APRIL LPT FOR A SCOPING REPORT DETAILING.
COSTS ON A COMMUNITY BY.
NEIGHBORHOOD CONSULTATION.

>> IF THAT GETS United States OUT OF THIS, > >.
BIND, I WILL DO THAT, YOUR.
PRAISE. >> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: DO WE.
HAVE A SECONDER? THANK YOU, ALDERMAN JONES. WHAT WE HAVE IN FRONT OF US.
NOW IS A REFERENCE MOTION.
BECAUSE ALDERMAN CHABOT DID NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT TO PERFORM AT LPT. IT'' S GREAT THAT WE CANISTER ALL. LAUGH TOGETHER AFTER WHAT WE'' VE BEEN THROUGH TODAY. SO WHAT WE HAVE ON THE TABLE.
RIGHT MOW IS A REFERENCE ACTIVITY MOVED BY ALDERMAN LOWE,.
SECONDED BY ALDERMAN JONES TO.
REFER ALDERMAN CHABOT'' S ACTIVITY TO THE APRIL MEETING OF LPT.
WITH SOME COSTING AROUND THE.
COMMUNITY BY AREA CONSULTATION. SEEM GOOD?
>> > > REFINE THIS A LITTLE SIMPLY AS I REFER BACK TO THE.
MANAGEMENT FOR A REPORT TO.
THE– >> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANK.
YOU. CONVERSATION ON THE REFERENCE MOVEMENT. INTEND TO CLOSE, ALDERMAN LOWE? ALDERMAN PINCOTT? YOU'' RE TURNING YOURSELF ON AND.
OFF. PERMIT ME TO TRY FROM HERE.

>> >'> I ' M SIMPLY AS CHALLENGED WITH.
THE REFERENCE AS I WAS WITH THE.
ACTIVITY. TO DO A LARGE RANGE AREA.
CONSULTATION, TO EVEN EXTENT IT.
AROUND SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE A DISCRETIONARY USE, SO AROUND.
SOMETHING THEN THAT WOULD.
ALWAYS INVOLVE AREA APPOINTMENT AT THE END OF THE.
DAY ON EVERY PERSON.
APPLICATION SEEMS LIKE, APPEARS LIKE, LARGE WORKOUT IN A.
WHOLE LOT OF FUNCTION AS WELL AS A GREAT DEAL OF CASH.
THAT AT THE END OF THE DAY, IF WE HAVE THE AREA.
ASSESSMENT AND WE DECIDE TO.
DO IT AS DISCRETIONARY USE ACCORDING TO 2 AND 3, EACH PERSON.
APPLICATION WILL CERTAINLY THEN INVOLVE.
COMMUNITY CONSULTATION AND ALSO DEVELOPMENT ALLOWS DO INVOLVE.
COMMUNITY INPUT. I'' M– WE ' RE TOSSING SERVICE TOP OF WORK, AND ALSO THE– EACH.
PILE OF WORK IS ACQUIRING BIGGER. FOR THAT FACTOR, I ASSUME THAT I WON'' T ASSISTANCE THE. REFERENCE AND ALSO'I WON ' T ASSISTANCE.
THE MOTION EITHER. YOU KNOW WHAT, IF WE WERE.
GOING TO ACCOMPLISH IT AROUND.
PERMITTED USAGE, I'' D BE AROUND IT.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: MANY THANKS,.
ALDERMAN PINCOTT. ON THE REFERRAL MOVEMENT,.
> > I BELIEVE A REFERENCE ACTIVITY IS PROBABLY A GREAT SUGGESTION. IT'' S GOING TO HAVE SOME EXPENSE. IF WE'' RE GOING TO DO THIS.
DOING IT IS An AREA BY.
BRT STATIONS THAT
RESIDE IN SO MANY DIFFERENT COMMUNITIESNEIGHBORHOODS THAT I CAN'' T HELP BUT IMAGINE.
MY COMMUNITIES WOULD WANT TO WEIGH IN ON THE CONVERSATION OF.
HAVING OUR ONE RC 1 ESTABLISHED.
WITHIN CLOSE CLOSENESS TO THE LRT TERMINALS, IF IT WERE GOING.
TO BE ALLOWED, IN WHICH IT'' S.
CURRENTLY FOR THE ALLOWED. THIS IS ESSENTIALLY OFFERING.
S CLASSIFICATION TO EVERY ONE OF THOSE.
RC 1s AS WELL AS R1 PROPERTIES SO IT CORRESPONDS TO A MASS REZONING.

> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: IT ' S NOT A FACTOR OF ORDER AT ALL. > > OK.
> > I ASK FORGIVENESS. > > ON THE TAPED BALLOT,.
> > YOU ' RE ACTUALLY.AS FOR WHETHER OR NOT THIS
IS GOING TO BE A DOUBLE INDEMNITY TYPE OF A POINT
WHERE WE UNDERTAKE A.
CONSULTATIVE PROCEDURE EVERY NOW AND THEN CARRY OUT A SUBSEQUENT.
CONSULTATIVE PROCEDURE,.
NEIGHBORHOOD CONSULTATIVE PROCESS, IS ACTUALLY NOT TOTALLY.
ACCURATE. when YOU USE FOR A GROWTH LICENSE APPLICATION.
THERE'' S A REALLY RESTRICTED.
CIRCULATION REGARDING THAT HAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO WEIGH IN ON THE.
CONVERSATIONS. YES, OF TRAINING COURSE IT IS NOTICE UPLOADED, BUT POINTER CHI UNLESS.
YOU'' RE AN IMPACTED CITIZEN,. UNLESS YOU ' RE DIRECTLY NEXT DOOR TO IT OR MORE OR 3.
DOORS BELOW YOUR HOME.
THAT'' S OBTAINING A GROWTH AUTHORIZATION APPLICATION,.
YOUR INPUT DOESN'' T CARRY A
GREAT DEAL.

OF WEIGHT.THE NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION OF.
FLOW CANISTER WEIGH RIGHT INTO IT ON–.
EVALUATE IN ON THE PROBLEM, BUT AS LONG AS YOU SATISFY THE.
REQUIREMENTS OF A LAND USAGE.
LAW, YOU'' RE GIVING ON SITE PARKING, YOU HAVE MINIMUM.
GREAT DEAL WIDTH DEMANDS, YOU'' RE. MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE LAND USAGE LAW, YOUR. ARGUMENT OF I WEAR'' T WANT IT. NEXT DOOR TO ME JUST WON'' T FLY. IT BEARS NO WEIGHT. SO THIS SINK An EXTREMELY THOUGHTFUL TECHNIQUE. IT REMAINS IN MAINTAINING WITH THE.
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKING OUT SENSITIVE.
INTENSIFICATION, PROVIDING IT.
WHERE IT MAKES ONE OF THE MOST SENSE TO PERFORM IT. AT THE END OF THE DAY, I ASSUME.
> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: MANY THANKS,
. I ' VE GOT– I ' M JUST GOING TO. > > NO.
> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI:. ALDERMAN HODGES? > > YES.
YOUR PRAISE, MEMBERS OF
. COUNCIL, THE REGARDS TO. REFERRAL ARE ESSENTIAL.
HOPEFULLY A RECORD CONTAINER BE.
ALL SET FOR THE APRIL LPT. CONFERENCE.
I ' LL HAVE THE ABILITY TO MAKE SOME.
ADDITIONAL REMARKS ABOUT WHAT. SORT OF AS MUCH AS Mr. WATSON MAY GRIT HIS TEETH, ABOUT WHAT.
TYPE OF– WHAT KIND OR WHAT. IT WOULD BE THE'BEST ROUTE TO GO IF YOU ' RE GOING TO GO THE. CONSULTING PATH. I RECOGNIZE THAT Mr. WATSON HAS A CALCULATED RESERVE IN THE.
DIVISION. I'' M NOT AS CONCERNED ABOUT COST AS ABOUT HOW THE MONEY IS.
SPENT. WE CONTAINER OBTAIN RIGHT INTO THAT AT THE APRIL LPT.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI:– I.
DON'' T THINK YOU PLANNED IT THUS. ALDERMAN CARRA.
>> > > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER, MEMBERS OF COUNCIL'. I ' M GOING TO AGREE WITH. ALDERMAN PINCOTT ON THIS ONE. I THINK IF WE ' RE SPENDING QUALITY TIME. AND RESOURCES ON NEIGHBORHOOD BY.
COMMUNITY CONSULTATION, WE MUST BE TALKING ABOUT.
OVERARCHING AREA.
CHANGE OVER.WE MUST NOT

BE CHATTING ABOUT.
SIMPLY FOR THE MOMENT BEING.
INCREMENTAL NO BRAINER OF ALLOWING SECONDARY SUITES. SECONDARY SUITES ARE JUST ONE.
PART OF A KPEPB COMPREHENSIVE IMPROVEMENT THAT HAS TO.
TAKE PLACE WITHIN 400 METRES OF.
TRANSPORTATION STOPS. THE TIMING OF THAT, COMPLETION.
APPEARANCE, EVERY ONE OF THAT, UNLESS.
WE'' RE DOING CONSULTATION AND DESIGN WORK IN THE DIRECTION OF THAT END,.
I PUT ON'' T THINK
I WEAR ' T– I. DON ' T SEE THE POINT IN HANGING OUT OR RESOURCES. I WON'' T BE SUSTAINING THAT. REFERRAL MOTION.
I ASSUME IT'' S A WASTE OF. EVERYBODY ' S TIME. > > YES, THANK YOU, YOUR PRAISE.
OPPORTUNITY TO GO OVER AND. FIND OUT MORE CONCERNING THE RAMIFICATIONS OF WHAT IS A. PROFOUND CHANGE TO THE ZONING.

OF THEIR COMMUNITIES.WHEN WE'MENTION FORCING, WHAT. WE ' RE TALKING IS FORCING A. PLAN. POLICY WHICH CAN HAVE PROFOUND.
EFFECTS ON THE NEIGHBORHOODS '. LIVEABILITY FOR ALL STAKEHOLDERS. IT HAS RAMIFICATIONS TO THE.
LOOK AND ALSO THE FEEL OF THE COMMUNITY. AS WELL AS I BELIEVE ANYTHING LESS THAN.
A COMMUNITY BY AREA APPOINTMENT WILL BE.
UNSATISFACTORY. THE INFLUENCES OF AN LRT TERMINAL ON A GLENDALE WILL CERTAINLY BE.
VARIOUS THAN THE LRT IMPACTS.
ON A CHRISTIE OR AN ASPEN. I BELIEVE ALL OF THESE AREAS.
ARE ENTITLED TO An AREA BY.
COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT, AND THEY MIGHT WELCOME UP WITH.
DIFFERENT REMEDIES AND ALSO.
DIFFERENT CONCEPTS ON An AREA BY COMMUNITY BASIS. I HEARTILY ENDORSE THIS.
RECOMMENDATION. THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANKS,.
ALDERMAN POOTMANS. GREAT FOR YOU FOR BEING AHEAD.
WHEN YOU SAID THE LRT, thinking.
TERMINAL ON GLENDALE. I NEEDED TO CONSIDER THAT FOR.
A SECONDLY.
17th AVENUE And Also 45th STREET. > > THANK YOU. WELL, LIKE ALDERMAN PINCOTT.
AS WELL AS CARRA PRIOR TO ME, I'' M NOT GOING TO ASSISTANCE THIS. AS WELL AS I'' M SORRY IF IT DOESN ' T FEELING GENUINE.
OF THE SMOKING BYLAW.I DON ' T KNOW IF YOU'GUYS.
REMEMBER IT. BUT WE DID ARRIVE EVENTUALLY.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: CAN WE.
PLEASE PHONE CALL IT THE NO SMOKING STPWHRAU.
>> > > THE NO CIGARETTE SMOKING BYLAW. IF WE CONTAINER'' T TAKE CARE OF TO MAKE THESE PERMITTED AND EVEN.
WHEN, DISCRETIONARY AROUND LRT.
IT FITS WITH EVERYTHING THAT WE'' VE– ALL OF OUR CITY
. PLANS IN THE BRAND-NEW MDP AND ALSO.
WORLD AND ALSO FAIR CALGARY AND ALL THAT, THEN I SIMPLY DON'' T. THINK WE ' RE READY. I WON ' T BE SUPPORTING IT AND ALSO I ' VE HEARD THE USAGE OF THE.
THIS ISN ' T> ADVANCEMENT,. COUNCIL. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN FARRELL. ANYONE ELSE ON THE REFERENCE.
ACTIVITY? ON THE MOTION TO REFER,. AFTER THAT– OH, DID YOU DESIRED TO. CLOSE, ALDERMAN LOWE? OK. ON THE RECOMMENDATION ACTIVITY, THIS. IS TO REFER THIS TO LPT IN APRIL FOR A SCOPING. ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED?> CALL THE FUNCTION, PLEASE.

>> > > ALDERMAN LOWE?
>> YES
>>. > > ALDERMAN MacLEOD >>? > >
>> NO. > > ALDERMAN PINCOTT? > >> NO. >> > > ALDERMAN POOTMANS?
>> > > YES>>. > > ALDERMAN STEEN KID? >> > > YES. > >> ALDERMAN CARRA?
>> > > NO >>. > > ALDERMAN CHABOT? > > YES.
>> > > ALDERMAN COLLEY-URQUHART.
>> > > YES. > > ALDERMAN
>> DEMONG? > > >> YES. > > ALDERMAN FARRELL? > > NO
>>.
>> > > ALDERMAN HODGES >> 134.
>> > > YES. > > ALDERMAN JONES? >> > YES >>. > > MAYOR NENSHI ISSHY? > > NO.
>> > > LUGGED, YOUR WORSHIP.
> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: ALL.
I ASSUME, LADIES AS WELL AS GENTLEMEN,. NO IS A REFERENCE ACTIVITY.
ANYMORE >> ACTIVITIES OCCURRING ON. 10.3.4? > > I ' D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION.
TO FILE >> A RECOMMENDATIONS OF.
LPT– > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: YOU.
ONLY HAVE TO, ALDERMAN CHABOT,. BECAUSE ONE OF THE ACTIVITIES WE– AMONG THE ACTIVITIES WE.
> > OKAY.DARN, I WAS HOPING TO FILE IT. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: I UNDERSTAND. YOU WERE LOOKING AHEAD TO IT.
ANY OTHER ACTIVITIES OCCUR. RECURRING 10. HE.3.4? O.K.. 10.4.1, PROGRESSION IN THE DIRECTION OF 8020. BY 2020 IN THE RESIDENTIAL SECTOR, THE UNE REPORTS. ALDERMAN JONES.
>> > > YOUR PRAISE,'I ' LL RELOCATION ALL THE REPORTS, THERE WAS ONE. DISCUSSION DONE THAT.
BASICALLY (INDISCERNIBLE) WE HAD A BUSINESS COME IN THAT.
PROVIDED United States SOME CHOICE WHICH.
WAS HENCE OFFERS YOU THE INSTRUCTIONS ON NUMBER 4, TO.
CONSIST OF IN THE RECORD OTHER.
MEANS OF ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTS THAT WERE OFFERED TO APPEARANCE AT.
HOW WE CONTAINER DO WASTE.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: WAS THERE DISCUSSION AT THE.
COMMITTEE IF THOSE.
OPTIONS CONSISTED OF THE WASTE TO POWER STUFF THAT'' S. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANK.
YOU. DO I HAVE A SECONDER FOR THAT? MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN PINCOTT. SO WE'' RE GOING TO MOVE–
. REMEMBER THERE'' S TWO NOW.SO 10.4.1 AND THE ONE THAT WE.
GOTTEN RID OF FROM THE BASIC DID.
WHICH WAS 10.4. ON MULTIFAMILY RECYCLING. QUESTIONS, CONVERSATION ON.
OH, I'' LL DO IT. Mr. PRITCHARD, WASTE ENERGY.
WHAT'' S GOING ON ON WASTE POWER A BIT OUT OF CONTROL. AM I CHECK OUT EXCESSIVE RIGHT INTO IT?
>> > > THANK YOU, PUT ON SHIM. ACTUALLY WE SPENT 18 MONTHS.
AND PRODUCED A 750 PAGE RECORD,.
YOUR PRAYER, THAT ACTUALLY CHECKED OUT, AMONGST OTHER.
POINTS, WASTE TO POWER AND.
THE CHOICE APPROACHES TO MANAGING ORGANICS SO WE.
STARTED WITH THE–.
LOOKING AT COMPOSITING AND AFTER THAT WE CONSIDERED A VARIETY OF.
OTHER TECHNOLOGIES AS WELL AS ALL THE.
MEANS AS MUCH AS ONE OF THE MOST INNOVATIVE WASTE TO POWER TECHNOLOGIES.
AND THE REFERRAL THAT.
CAME FROM THE PROFESSIONAL AFTERWARDS STUDY WAS THAT THERE IS A.
AREA FOR WASTE TO POWER AND.
THERE'' S A TIME FOR IT, BUT THE SIMPLEST AND THE MAJORITY OF PROPER.
MEANS TO OFFER WITH THE INITIAL.
TROUBLE OF BACKYARD WASTE AND FOOD WASTE FROM RESIDENTIAL IS.
ACTUALLY TO GO WITH THE SIMPLE.
COMPOSTING PATH, AND ALSO THEN BY THE TIME WE GET TO TYPE OF 75%.
DIVERSION, THAT'' S THE TIME WE. WOULD BEGINNING LOOKING AT THE WASTE TO ENERGY INNOVATIONS. ALREADY, OUT OF THE SORT.
OF UNTRIED AS WELL AS EXAMINED TECHNOLOGIES WILL CERTAINLY HAVE BEEN.
AROUND AWHILE LONGER AS WELL AS.
WILL CERTAINLY HAVE A MUCH BETTER TRACK RECORD OF KNOWING HOW THEY.
PERFORM AND SO FORTH.
0 IT'' S QUITE An IDEA– WELL IDEA OUT TECHNIQUE, YOUR.
PRAYER, IN

>> REGARDS TO THE.
PROPOSALS. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THAT.
IS PRECISELY WHAT I NEEDED TO. HEAR, Mr. PRITCHARD, THANKS. ALDERMAN CARRA.
>> > > ASKED AND ADDRESSED RIGHT THERE.
> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANK. YOU. ALDERMAN HODGES? NEXT ITEM. ANYTHING EVEN MORE ON THIS ONE?
ON THE COMMITTEE ' S. RECOMMENDATIONS– DID YOU. WISH TO CLOSE, ALDERMAN JONES? ON THE COMMITTEE ' S. REFERRALS, ARE WE. AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? ALDERMAN CHABOT IS OPPOSED.
LUGGED.10.4.2, WHICH IS THE ONE WE.
TOOK OFF THE CON SENSE AGENDA. ON MULTIFAMILY RECYCLING, ALDERMAN– IT ' S ALREADY BEEN. SECONDED and relocated SO ALDERMAN.
> > YES, MANY THANKS, YOUR PRAISE. Mr. PRITCHARD, THIS ISN ' T A.
COMMITTEE MEETING, HAPPENED TO.
BE AT I CAPTURED SEVERAL OF IT ON CLOSED CIRCUIT INSURANCE COVERAGE WE.
HAVE IN THE BUILDING NEXT DOOR,.
AS WELL AS THERE'' S A BIT MORE INQUIRIES.'I ' M RECEIVING,
ANYHOW, FROM. CONDOMINIUM– MULTIFAMILY BUT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENTS WHERE.
THEY HAVE NO RECYCLING SERVICE.
WHATEVER FROM ANY– EITHER PRIVATE BUSINESS OR I GATHER.
WITH THE GUIDELINES THE WAY THEY.
ARE FROM THE CITY.SO TO OPEN THIS APPROXIMATELY, YOU.
MAY SAY, SOME CITY OF.
CALGARY SERVICES, THIS WOULD NEED AN CHANGE TO THE.
POLICY WE HAVE AT TODAY.
TIME, STRAIGHTFORWARD and also plain. >> > > THAT ' S CORRECT, YOUR
. PRAYER. THE HERE AND NOW DIRECTION WE HAVE IS THAT THE CITY DOES NOT GET.
ENTAILED IN MULTIFAMILY.
RECYCLING UNTIL IT'' S OBVIOUS THAT WE'' RE NOT GOING TO. ATTAIN OUR A G-20 GOAL BY.
2020 AS WELL AS THAT'' S NOT THE CASE CURRENTLY. SO COMPLYING KEEPING THAT.
DIRECTION WE WOULD WAIT AND ALSO I BELIEVE THE APPROACH THAT WE.
HAVE HERE ONCE AGAIN IS QUITE WELL.
ESTABLISHED IN REGARDS TO BEING ABLE TO INVEST A LITTLE OF.
TIME REALLY WORKING A WHOLE LOT EVEN MORE.
WITH THE INDUSTRY, THE PRIVATE RECYCLERS, LOOKING AT WHAT.
PERHAPS THE CITY'' S POSITION.
MAY BE EVENTUALLY AND AFTERWARDS RETURNING WITH A COMPLETE STRATEGY.
FOR COUNCIL TO CONSIDER IN THE.
> > A PAIR OF YEARS OUT. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI
: ALITY. > > THANK YOU.
WITH REGARDS TO THE POSSIBILITY OF THESE PRIVATE.
COMPANIES DEPOSITING.
MATERIAL STRAIGHT TO THE (INDISCERNIBLE) CENTER OR.
HOW ARE WE FACILITATING THAT?
>> > > THE SETUP WE'' VE MADE PRESENTLY IS TO ASSIST IN. THAT BY HAVING A DROP-OFF.
STATION AT OUR SHEPHERD GARBAGE DUMP TO ENSURE THAT THE PRIVATE.
RECYCLERS CANISTER COME TO OUR.
CENTER AT OUR GARBAGE DUMP AND DECREASE IT OFF THERE, THEN WE.
TAKE IT IN OUR TRUCKS TO THE.
MULTI– TO THE MURFP, THE MATERIALS REUSING FACILITY. I DO SO THEY PAY A STANDARD.
TIPPING FEE? >> > > THEY PAY– I ASSUME IT'' S. $ 32 A TONNE, TO BE ABLE TO. DECREASE IT OFF AT OUR FACILITY.THAT COVERS OUR PRICE OF. BASICALLY OPERATING THAT.
FACILITY AS WELL AS OBTAINING THE RECYCLABLES TO THE MRF. IT DOESN'' T COVER THE COST OF. THE PROCESSING FEE AT THE MRF. IT ' S JUST COVERING OUR.
PRICES TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT. IT WOULD PROBABLY TOTAL UP TO 20 OR 30 CENTS PER CUSTOMER PER.
MONTH OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. IT WOULDN'' T HAVE A MASSIVE>> IMPACT ON'THE CUSTOMER BASE. > > IT ' S 120 OR SO PER TONNE. TYPICALLY FOR REGULAR WASTE? >> > > TO GET RID OF WASTE IN THE.
LANDFILL IS $95 A TONNE RIGHT.
CURRENTLY. >> > > STILL UNDER A HUNDRED.
OK. THANK YOU.
ADMINISTRATIVE INQUIRIES ESPECIALLY CONNECTED TO THAT.
CONCERN. THANK YOU. >> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: MANY THANKS,.
ALDERMAN CHABOT. ALDERMAN STEVENSON? >> > > MANY THANKS, YOUR WORSHIP. JUST TO CLEAR UP BECAUSE OF.
ALDERMAN HODGES' ' INQUIRY, WHEN I MOVED THE MOVEMENT BACK. TWO AS WELL AS A HALF YEARS AGO TO DO.
THIS TO LEAVE THE MULTIFAMILY AVAILABLE TO THE PRIVATE FIELD, AT.
THAT EXACT SAME TIME THE– A COMPONENT.
OF THAT DIRECTION WAS FOR THE– OUR MANAGEMENT TO.
OPERATE AT OBTAINING ACCESS FOR.
THOSE PRIVATE CONTRACTORS TO THE MRF. THAT HASN'' T– IT HASN ' T. HAPPENED UNTIL JUST IN DECEMBER, THE PRIVATE.
CONTRACTORS WERE BROUGHT.
WITH EACH OTHER AND AFTER THAT IN JANUARY THEY MAY TO DUMPTY.
TRANSFER SITE. IT'' S SIMPLY CURRENTLY, AS OF 2011, THAT THE EXCLUSIVE SPECIALISTS. CONTAINER ACTUALLY BEGIN AT THIS. AND SO I BELIEVE YOU'' RE GOING TO SEE QUITE AN UPTICK ON THIS.
BECAUSE THERE IS A GREAT DEAL OF.
PRESSURE FROM CONDO ASSOCIATIONS TO FIND A TECHNIQUE.
OF MOVING THEIR RECYCLABLES,.
I ASSUME YOU'' RE GOING TO SEE EVEN MORE OF THAT NOW THAT THERE ' S. SOME ACTIVITY TAKEN ON IT. DUE TO THE FACT THAT I '
M NOT HAPPY SATISFIED THE, I ' M NOT PLEASED WITH THE ACTIVITY. REALITY THAT THESE PRIVATE
. SERVICE PROVIDERS ARE UNABLE TO TAKE THE– THEIR
RECYCLABLES. STRAIGHT TO THE MRF, BUT AT. LEAST WASTE AS WELL AS RECYCLING HAS ESTABLISH THIS TRANSFER FROM.
SHEPPARD PARDON WHICH IS GOOD.
FOR THE INTERIM AND ALSO THEY'' RE STILL GOING TO MAINTAIN FUNCTION.
CONTINUOUS OBTAINING IT ESTABLISH AT.
THE MRF.THANK YOU,

YOUR PRAISE.
>> > > I STILL THINK WE SHOULD.
HAVE CALLED IT THE SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS REUSING CENTER.
WE CANISTER CALL IT THE SMURF. > > THANK YOU. Mr. PRITCHARD, I'' M AFRAID I MISSED THIS CONFERENCE.
SO THAT PRIVATE RECYCLERS CAN DROP OFF PRODUCTS, IN.
CONSULTATION WITH THE MARKET,.
HOW MUCH UPTAKE DO WE THINK WE'' RE GOING TO OBTAIN OR HOW MUCH.
DO YOU ASSUME WE CANISTER ANTICIPATE.
OVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS? >> > > I ASSUME WE WERE QUITE
. SHOCKED TO HOW MANY INDIVIDUALS,.
MULTIFAMILY CENTERS, ALREADY HAVE RECYCLING AND.
WE'' RE JUST STARTING TO FIND.
OUT EVEN MORE AS WELL AS MORE ABOUT WHO'' S DOING WHAT AVAILABLE. COMPONENT OF THE DIFFICULTY IS, IS.
THAT THE SIGNIFICANT DIVERSITY OF OBVIOUSLY REAL ESTATE AND.
APARTMENT KINDS THAT LOSS INTO.
THE MULTIFAMILY FIELD, SO THERE'' S NOT ACTUALLY An EASY. SERVICE TO ANY PARTICULAR ONE,.
ONE HOUSING KIND. AND ALSO SOME RECYCLERS PREFER TO.
CHOOSE UP JUST FIBER. SOME DON'' T PREFER TO BE COMMINGLED AND ALSO PROBABLY WOULD.
NOT WISH TO GO TO THE MUST.
HAVE BEEN.MANY OTHERS WOULD. I THINK WE ' RE QUITE. OPTIMISTIC THAT IF WE HAVE
, AS ALDERMAN STEVENSON SAID, WE. SANCTUARY ' T REALLY HAD A REALLY.
GOODEN GAUGING CONVERSATION WITH THE MARKET UP UNTIL RELATIVELY.
LATELY AS WELL AS I BELIEVE WE'' RE. IF WE DO THAT AND SPEND TIME WITH THEM AS WELL AS, QUITE OPTIMISTIC.
CHECK OUT THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR.
TRANSFER STATIONS, FOR FEASIBLE EASIER ACCESSIBILITY TO THE.
MRF, THE RIGHT LORRY KIND.
AND SO FORTH, THAT THERE WILL CERTAINLY BE A TREMENDOUS UPTAKE BECAUSE.
WE'' RE HEARING FROM MULTIFAMILY.
RESIDENTS THAT THEY NEED THIS SERVICE.
>> > > BECAUSE WE KIND OF HAVE.
THIS, FOR ABSENCE OF A FAR BETTER WORD, RESTRICTION ON THE CITY.
ACTUALLY DOING THIS, ARE WE.
BEING PROACTIVE IN TRYING TO NOT SIMPLY INVOLVE THE PRIVATE.
RECYCLERS BUT ACTUALLY.
PUSH and encourage THEM INTO DOING THIS? I OBTAINED TO TELL YOU, AFTER THE.
ROLLOUT OF HEAVEN BINS AS WELL AS MANAGING THE CHALLENGE OF.
THE ROLLOUT AS WELL AS INDIVIDUALS.
UNDERSTANDING HOW THEY WORKED, THE ONLY PHONE CALL THAT I ENTER MY.
OFFICE, THE ONLY TELEPHONE CALL SINCE.
THE ROLLOUT, IS HOW COME I CAN'' T RECYCLE, HOW COME
I. DON ' T GET
>> IT? > > I THINK THE SOLUTION TO THAT IS THAT– I MEAN, AS YOU UNDERSTAND,.
THE CHANCE FOR RECYCLING.
FOR THE MULTIFAMILY MARKET CURRENTLY IS THE AREA.
RECYCLELE DEPOTS, THE 52 WE.
HAVE AROUND THE CITY, WHICH OPTION IS THERE FOR.
MULTIFAMILY HOMEOWNERS OR THEY.
CANISTER ENGAGE THE SOLUTIONS OF– WE WERE QUITE SURPRISED AT HOW.
LOTS PRIVATE RECYCLERS THERE.
ARE AVAILABLE IN BUSINESS.AND THEY CAN ENGAGE

THE. SOLUTIONS OF THOSE. AS WELL AS WE ARE HAVING RELATIVELY ACTIVE DISCUSSIONS KEEPING THAT. SECTOR TO SHOT AND MOTIVATE.
MORE– TO SHOT AND ASSIST IN
MULTIFAMILY RECYCLING. IN THE RECORD THE ATTACHMENT. SPEAKS REGARDING THE METHOD OF ADD-ON– ADD-ON 1. CHATS CONCERNING THE DIVERSE.
METHOD THAT WE ' RE GOING TO REQUIRE TO SHOT AND ALSO ENCOURAGE. MULTIFAMILY RECYCLING OVER THE.
NEXT LITTLE WHILE.
AND ALSO AFTER THAT FOR REALLY.
DEVELOPING A PROPER.
COMPREHENSIVE COMPLETE SOLUTION IN TIME FOR THE 15 TO 17 BUSINESS.
CYCLE.
>> > > ONE LAST INQUIRY. WHEN SOMEBODY CALLS 311 AS WELL AS.
THEY RESIDE IN An APARTMENT, AN.
APARTMENT, AND THEY DON'' T HAVE RECYCLING AND TELEPHONE CALL OUR 311 TO.
STATE WHY DON'' T I HAVE
RECYCLING,. DO WE GIVE THEM A LIST OF PRIVATE RECYCLERS THAT THEY.
CAN STKPHAUL.
>> > > THAT I PUT ON ' T KNOW, YOUR WORSHIP. WE HAVE TO EXPLORE THAT.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: I ASSUME THAT WOULD BE A GREAT.
IDEA, IF WE COULD MAKE CERTAIN THAT.
WE ARE SUPPORTING PRESSING INDIVIDUALS IN THE DIRECTION OF THAT.
>> > > WE CANISTER CERTAINLY CHECK OUT.
THAT.

>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANK.
YOU. ANY INDIVIDUAL ELSE? ALDERMAN JONES, DID YOU NEED.
TO SHUT? CLOSED. SO ON THE MOTION TO THE.
ADMINISTRATION SUGGESTIONS.
ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? BROUGHT.
10.5.1, AUDIT BOARD STIPULATIONS OF REFERENCE TESTIMONIAL, ALDERMAN.
PINCOTT.
>> > > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAYER. MOVE THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF.
> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: ALDERMAN PINCOTT– LET'' S GET. ALDERMAN PINCOTT– THERE YOU.
THANK YOU, ALDERMAN. ALDERMAN MacLEOD WILL SECOND IT.
ALDERMAN PINCOTT, JUST SO I. UNDERSTAND THE SUGGESTIONS OF THE COMMITTEE', I BELIEVE.
THEY ARE LET ' S FUNCTION WITH THE. > >. AS WELL AS THE SUGGESTIONS ARE TO NOT SIMPLY TO LOOK AT STIPULATIONS OF.
REFERRAL FOR THE AUDIT.
COMMITTEE BUT ACTUALLY TO BE QUITE A LITTLE BIT EVEN MORE.
FORCEFUL AS WELL AS ACTUALLY.
PRODUCE– ESTABLISH AN AUDIT COMMITTEE LAW SO THAT THE.
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE.
BOARD WOULD BE EMHE HADED– EMBEDDED IN A LAW. I ASSUME– AND WHEN YOU TAKE A.
CONSIDER BEST PRACTICES THAT ARE AVAILABLE, IT IS THE METHOD.
THAT THINGS ARE GOING.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: FOR THE DOCUMENT, ALDERMAN PINCOTT,.
I DO LIKE RECOMMENDATION.
NUMBER C IN THE ORIGINAL DECLARATION SO I REALLY HOPE WE TALK.
REGARDING IT. ANY INDIVIDUAL ELSE ON THIS SET? REALLY WELL. ON THE BOARD'' S. RECOMMENDATIONS ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? CARRIED. LAND COMPLETE– OH, I DO? YES. LAND COMPLETE, THING 10.6.1,.
LAS 2011-02, ALDERMAN HODGES.

>> > > YES, THANK YOU, YOUR.
WORSHIP. THIS WAS THE SUBJECT OF SOME CONVERSATION AT LAND BOARD.
OVER THE AREA OF 2 CONFERENCES,.
WE RAN OUT OF TIME, ON THE FIRST CONFERENCE AS WELL AS SO WE SET UP.
A SECONDLY ONE. THE RECORD WAS ACCEPTED BY THE COMMITTEE, AS WELL AS YOU HAVE TWO.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO ACCREDIT.
THE LEASE REFERRALS AS OUTLINED IN ADD-ON 2. NUMBER 2, DIRECT.
ADMINISTRATION TO PROVIDE A CONDITION RECORD ON THE PROGRESS.
OF NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN.
( INDISCERNIBLE) CALGARY AND COMMAND PROPERTY STRATEGY.
COMMISSION NOT LATER THAN.
SEPTEMBER 13th, 2011.

( INDISCERNIBLE) IS THE NEW.
NAME FOR THE VRRI WHICH HAS.
BEEN IN POSITION UP ON 32nd AVENUE NORTHWEST SINCE 1967. THEY'' RE SEEKING A LONGER. LEASE, YOUR PRAYER, IN ORDER TO FACILITATE THEIR PROGRAM OF.
RECONSTRUCTING THE VRRI,.
REFURBISHING THE FACILITIES, AND ALSO IN REALITY PERHAPS RESTORING ON.
THAT SITE. NONE OF THIS IS GOING TO HAPPEN UNLESS WE AGREE TO.
EXPAND THE LEASE THAT THEY.
HAVE ON THE CITY-OWNED LAND. >> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: SORRY,.
I HAVE A NUMBER OF QUESTIONS ON.
THIS SET. DO WE HAVE A SECONDER?
>> > > SO DID THE COMMITTEE.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: DO WE HAVE A SECONDER? ALDERMAN LOWE, MANY THANKS. YOU UNDERSTAND SOMETHING, I'' M GOING TO ACCOMPLISH SOMETHING EXCEPTIONALLY.
UNCHAIR STICK. I'' M GOING TO HOP ON MY CHAIR NOW SINCE I DO HAVE A NUMBER
. OF QUESTIONS ON THIS ONE THAT.
I'' D LIKE TO PRESENT TO THE ADMINISTRATION. ALDERMAN CARRA. ALDERMAN HODGES, YOU'' RE DONE?.
I ' M PERFORMED WITH THE. INTRODUCTION. WE ' LL SEE WHAT YOUR
>> QUESTIONS ARE. > > MAYOR NENSHI>? > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: I DISCOVER THIS ENTIRE THING RATHER.
PERPLEXING. TO BEGIN WITH, I HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF EXPERIENCE, AS A NUMBER OF YOU.
KNOW, IN THE NON-PROFIT INDUSTRY.
AS WELL AS FUNDING CAMPAIGNS AND SO FORTH, AND I HAVE NEVER EVER HEARD.
OF A NON-PROFIT COMPANY.
MAKING THE INSURANCE CLAIM THAT UNLESS THEIR LEASE IS EXTENDED FOR A.
PERIOD PAST THE USEFUL LIFE.
OF A STRUCTURE THAT THEY CANISTER NOT FUND INCREASE FOR THE STRUCTURE. IT'' S– SHALL WE SAY DUBIOUS.
CASE AT BEST.THAT SAID,

I ' M A REALLY, EXTREMELY.
BIG FAN OF THIS ORGANIZATION. I ASSUME THEY DO EXTRAORDINARY WORK IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. I HAVE ADDITIONALLY SPOKEN WITH.
THE INDIVIDUALS AT INNOVATE CALGARY WHO QUITE TRUTHFULLY DON'' T HAVE. ANY PLANS YET. THEY ' RE A NEW ORGANIZATION, AND ALSO WHAT THEY'' RE LOOKING FOR.
IS ULTIMATE VERSATILITY. SO Mr. STEVENSON, I DON'' T GET THESE SUGGESTIONS. IT SOUNDS TO ME LIKE.
RECOMMENDATION TOP IS EXTEND THE LEASE FOR A BIG.
EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME AS WELL AS.
RECOMMENDATION NUMBER 2 IS REPORT BACK ON THE.
ARRANGEMENTS. IF WE EXTEND THE LEASE, DOESN'' T THAT BY MEANING.
MEAN THE SETTLEMENTS MORE THAN?
>> > > YOUR PRAYER, THAT'' S CORRECT. THE 2ND RECOMMENDATION WAS. ADDED ON THE SECOND DAY, AS WELL AS IF I CAN BE SO BOLD I'' LL TRY.
AND INTERPRET I BELIEVE WHERE.
COMMITTEE WAS GOING WAS TO SAY IN TRUTH INNOVATE CALGARY DID.
NOT HAVE ANY SPECIFIC INTENDS.
BUT THERE WAS A DESIRE BY COMMITTEE TO SEE IF BOTH.
TEAMS COULDN'' T OBTAIN WITH EACH OTHER.
IN THIS AMOUNT OF TIME TO SEE IF THEY COULDN'' T COME
TO A. BETTER RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE.
2 OF THEM AND ALSO THE SUPPORT WAS FOR BOTH.
OF THEM TO PERFORM THAT AND AFTERWARDS.
FOR THE MANAGEMENT TO COME BACK IN NO LATER THAN.
SEPTEMBER TO SEE IF THEY HAD.
MADE ANY PROGRESS IN THEIR CHOICE.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: I CAN.
LIVE WITH RECOMMENDATION NUMBER 2 DUE TO THE FACT THAT I ASSUME BOTH.
CELEBRATIONS ARE TYPE OF BEING BAD.
STARS A BIT HERE, BUT DOESN'' T SUGGESTION NUMBER.
1 PUT THE THUMB ON THE RANGE?

> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THANKS,
. > > NO.
> > ALDERMAN FARRELL? > > YES. > > THANK YOU, WORE SHIM.DOESN'' T IT SAY LECOVIA CAN REMAIN THIS PERMANENTLY, NOW YOU CANISTER
GO NEGOTIATE?
>> >

> YES.THE ORIGINAL SUGGESTION
WAS NOT THAT, WHAT WAS TO SAY
YOU RECOGNIZE WHAT WE'' VE GOT THESE 2 GROUPS, THEIR INSURANCE CLAIM BEING
WHAT IT WAS, THEY COULD NOT
PROCEED. IT OFFERS THE CHANCE FOR
WHAT LECOVIA WAS SAYING, WE
WEREN'' T HAVING ANY SUCCESS IN THE PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS
>
>> > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THAT'' S THE KEY TRICK I WAS MISSINGMISSING OUT ON > > WASN ' T ONLY THAT. > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: O.K..
OUT AT THIS. I TIN UNDERSTAND THE REQUIREMENT TO.
BRING BOTH COMPANIES.
TOGETHER AND ALSO I CAN UNDERSTAND THE REQUIREMENT TO GIVE THEM A.
TARGET DATE. I HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF DIFFICULTY WITH ALLOWING AMONG THE CELEBRATIONS.
HAVE ALL THE POWER IN THE.
ARRANGEMENT. SO BECAUSE OF THIS, I WAS SIMPLY–.
REALLY? COULD DO. WHAT I WAS GOING TO DO WAS I.
WAS GOING TO SUGGEST AN.
CHANGE TO NUMBER 1, WHICH IS TO ACCREDIT LEASE.
SUGGESTIONS DESCRIBED IN.
ATTACHMENT 2 AS OF 2011, SEPTEMBER 15, PENDING THE.
END RESULT OF SUGGESTION.
NUMBER 2.

IN OTHER WORDS THEY'' VE
GOT. A DEADLINE.', if THEY CANISTER ' T COME TO AN AGREEMENT
BY SEPTEMBER THE.. 15th, THEN LECOVIA GETS WHAT.
THEY NEED. I RECOGNIZE THAT STILL SUGGESTS.
THEY'' VE GOT
AN INCENTIVE TO. DRAG THEIR HEELS ON THIS, BUT I ASSUME IT AT THE VERY LEAST SAYS TO.
INNOVATE CALGARY YOU CONTAINER COME.
TO THE TABLE AS A PARTNER HERE. THE CITY DOESN'' T HAVE A. PRE-ORDAINED OUTCOME. I'' M GOING TO SUGGEST THAT.
MODIFICATION. ALDERMAN CHABOT. >> > > ANY DISCUSSION TO THAT.
RECOMMENDED MODIFICATION? I HAVE MY ELEVATION ON. ALDERMAN HODGES. YOUR PRAISE, MEMBERS OF.
COUNCIL, I ASSUME THE COMMITTEE MIGHT HAVE AGREED WITH AN.
MODIFICATION LIKE THAT, THE CHAIR,.
MAYOR NENSHI, EXCEPT THAT THE CELEBRATIONS HAVE BEEN IN.
CONVERSATIONS AT VARIOUS TIME IN.
THE LAST THREE OR 4 YEARS, AS WELL AS THESE DISCUSSIONS RESULTED.
IN NO AGREEMENT WHATSOEVER. WHAT INNOVATE CALGARY PRESENTED AT BOARD WAS A.
DELAY HOLD-UP SIX MONTHS IN THE.
FIRST CONFERENCE AND ALSO SECONDLY MEETING IT WAS A HOLD-UPS OF.
THREE MONTHS. AND DIRECTLY IF I'' D IDEA THERE WOULD
BE ANY ARRANGEMENT.
IN 3 MONTHS OR SIX MONTHS.

I MIGHT HAVE CONCURRED WITH Mr.MASTERS, BUT I KNOW THERE. WILL CERTAINLY NOT BE AN CONTRACT IN. THEE MONTHS, I KNOW THERE WILL CERTAINLY NOT BE AN CONTRACT IN 6. MONTHS. GIVEN THE PROBLEMS INVOLVED. INNOVATE CALGARY, QUITE.
TRUTHFULLY, PRAYER, LECOVIA AS.
BEING IN THEIR MEANS SO THEIR SUGGESTION IS TO HAVE A NEGOTIATION.
SET UP SOMEHOW WITH THE.
DISTRICT TO RELOCATE THEM IN AN INNOVATE CALGARY LOCATION, i.e. NORTH OF 32 METHODS AND WEST OF.
CROWCHILD TRAIL. GIVEN MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.
AS WELL AS WANTING TO BE A COMPONENT OF AS WELL AS.
OBTAINING BUSINESS RESIDENCES INVOLVED IN A NEW WEBSITE, THE.
NEW SITE FOR THE NORTHWEST REC.
CENTRE, THAT DIRECTLY WAS, WITH ALDERMAN LOWE AND MYSELF,.
THAT WAS 3 YEARS. SO THREE YEARS AS WELL AS HANDLING THE PROVINCE. SO I THINK THAT'' S WHAT.

Mr.MASTERS IS INTERESTED IN GETTING THE DISTRICT INVOLVED.
ON THEIR LAND HOLDINGS WITHIN.
THE INNOVATE CALGARY AREA SO I WEAR'' T SEE THIS DELAY IS.
REALLY– NORMALLY I WOULD.
AGREE. GIVEN THE HISTORY OF THIS.
PROBLEM, I WILL NOT BE.
> > ALDERMAN FARRELL? I WAS SIMPLY SPEAKING WITH THE MAYOR AND ALSO IDEA THAT IF THIS.
WAS DESCRIBED THE MAYOR,.
PERHAPS HE COULD MEET WITH BOTH ASSISTANCES and also celebrations.
ASSIST IN.
>> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: THIS IS THE SECOND TIME YOU'' VE. REFERRED SOMETHING TO THE.
MAYOR, ALDERMAN FARRELL.IT DIDN ' T EXERCISE EFFECTIVELY.
THE FIRST TIME.
>> > > POSSIBLY NOT. >> > > MAYOR NAHEED NENSHI: I CAN.
COPE WITH THAT.
>> > > DO YOU ASSUME THAT WOULD … I ASSUME IT COULD BE HELPFUL. Mr. HODGES– ALDERMAN.
HODGES– >> > > WE HAVE A SECONDER FOR. ALDERMAN FARRELL ' S REFERENCE.
>> MOTION?( PLEASE STAND BY ).
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: AND. ACTIVITY TO GO IN VIDEO CAMERA, ARE WE AGREED?
“CAPTIONING OF THIS CONFERENCE IS. GIVEN AS An INTERACTION EASE OF ACCESS STEP AND ALSO IS NOT.
MEANT AS A VERBATIM.
RECORDS OF THE PROCEEDINGS. IF ERRORS TAKE PLACE, IT MAY BE.
BECAUSE OF HUMAN MISTAKE, TECHNICAL.
TROUBLES, OR AN FAILURE FOR THE WRITER TO HEAR.
OR UNDERSTAND WHAT IS BEING.
SAID.WHILE BEST EFFORTS ARE MADE TO FILE AS CLOSELY AS.
FEASIBLE WHAT IS BEING SAID, THE.
CAPTIONS CONTAINER NOT BE RELIED UPON AS A CERTIFIED ACCURATE RECORD.
OF THE PROCEDURES.””.
AS A CERTIFIED ACCURATE RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS.””.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: AS WELL AS WE.
ARE BACK. ALDERMAN HODGES?
>> > > RELOCATION THE COMMITTEE SURGE TO.
REPORT, YOUR PRAISE. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
ALDERMAN JONES. ALDERMAN HODGES YOU STILL HAVE.
THE FLOOR. >> > > THANK YOU. THREE LAND THINGS, LAND AND POSSESSION.
APPROACH 2011-04, PROPOSED SALE OF GREAT LEVELS, WARD 9. FIRST REFERRAL THAT THE.
LAND AND ALSO POSSESSION TECHNIQUE BOARD REFERRAL.
INCLUDED IN THE REPORT.
L.A.S.-2011-04 BE EMBRACED AND ALSO THE RECOMMENDATIONS. NUMBER 2 THE RECOMMENDATIONS.
RECORD AND ATTACHMENTS CONTINUE TO BE CONFIDENTIAL COMPLYING WITH THE.
IN-CAMERA DISCUSSION UNDER.
AREA 23.5 B, AND ALSO THE FLEXIBILITY OF DETAILS AS WELL AS DEFENSES OF.
PERSONAL PRIVACY ACT UNTIL 2013,.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: ARE YOU GOING DO THEM ALL.
WITH EACH OTHER IN.
>> > > OKAY. 2011-05 IS ONCE AGAIN PROPOSED SALE.
OF LAND IN THE INDUSTRIAL LANDS.
EXCELLENT LEVELS WARD 9. NUMBER 1 THE LAND AND ALSO POSSESSION.
METHOD COMMITTEE.
REFERRAL HAD IN A RECORD L.AS.-2011-05 BE TAKEN ON.
WHICH THE SUGGESTIONS.
RECORD AND ADD-ON REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL COMPLYING WITH THE.
IN-CAMERA DISCUSSIONS PURSUANT.
TO THE VERY SAME SECTIONS. SUBB OF THE FLEXIBILITY OF.
INFORMATION OF SECURITY OF.
PERSONAL PRIVACY ACT TILL 201, DECEMBER 31 AS WELL AS– 2013,.
DECEMBER 31.
>> > > ON A POINT IN WHICH THOSE FIRST 2 THINGS THAT HE'' S REFERRED,. I ' M NOT ENCOURAGING OF THOSE AND ALSO. I WOULD RATHER VOTE ON THOSEVATELY.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I WAS.
GOING TO BALLOT ON THEM ALL INDIVIDUALLY ANYHOW. ALDERMAN CHABOT, I WAS GOING TO.
ALLOW HIM PUT THEM ALL ON THE TABLE AND ALSO BALLOT ON THEM.
INDEPENDENTLY.
>> > > THE LAST ONE, ROPOSED TRANSACTIONS NORTH DUFFERIN.
INDUSTRIAL LAND WARD 12 THAT THE.
LAND AS WELL AS PROPERTY APPROACH BOARD SUGGESTIONS.
INCLUDED IN THE RECORD LAND AND.
ASSET STRATEGY 2011-06 BE TAKEN ON.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: ALL.
RIGHT, THEN.ALDERMAN FARRELL YOU ' RE GOING TO.
2ND THOSE AS THE VICE CHAIR? OKAY. THANKS. ANY DISCUSSION ON THESE THINGS? SO ON THE FIRST ONE THEN ARE WE CONCURRED? ANY OPPOSED? ALDERMAN CHABOT IS OPPOSED. SECOND ONE CONCURRED, ANY OPPOSED. ALD CHABOT IS OPPOSED. THIRD ONE ARE WE CONCURRED? CARRIED. ALDERMAN JONES.
>> > > YOUR WORSHIP, THE FIRST ONE IS AOC-2011 THE TESTIMONIAL OF THE.
ALLOCATION ACCOUNT POLICY AND.
THAT THE ALDERMAN COORDINATE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS.
INCLUDED IN REPORT AOC-2011-05.
BE ADOPTED. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
ALDERMAN CHABOT, SECOND? ANY DISCUSSION ON– WHY DON'' T. > > OKAY.
BOOSTING THE NEIGHBORHOOD CSIF.
AIR ALLOTMENT HONOR THAT THE ACCORDING COMMITTEE.
RECOMMENDATION HAD IN THE.
REPORT BE ADOPTED. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
ALDERMAN CHABOT IS SECOND. ANY CONVERSATION ON THESE ONE? THESE RECORDS WILL CURRENTLY BE PUBLIC.
WHEN WE PASS IT, MADAM CLERK SO.
I TIN IN FACT SAY TO THOSE INTREPID MEMBERS OF JOURNALISM.
STILL IN THE ROOM, READ.
AOC-2011-05.

( LAUGHTER).
ALDERMAN CHABOT AND ALSO I MAY HAVE A.
DISAGREEMENT ON WHAT IT SAYS BUT I THINK YOU WILL CERTAINLY FIND.
IT INTERESTING. ON THE FIRST ONE, ARE WE AGREED? AGREED. ANY OPPOSED? CARRIED. AS WELL AS ON THE SECOND ONE, ARE WE.
AGREED? ANY OPPOSED? BROUGHT. ALDERMAN STEVENSON?
>> > > THANK YOU, YOUR PRAISE. ALLOW THE SPOKEN REPORT. ARRANGEMENTS WITH THE CALGARY.
FLIGHT TERMINAL AUTHORITY BE RECEIVED FOR INFO AS WELL AS LET THE.
CONVERSATION RELATIVE TO THE.
SPOKEN REPORT REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO.
SECTIONS 23.1 (B), 241 (C) OF.
VOIP. >> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
MANY THANKS. DO I HAVE A SECONDER? MANY THANKS, ALDERMAN CHABOT. ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS? ARE WE AGREED? BROUGHT. ALDERMAN MacLEOD.
>> > > WITH RESPECT TO THE CALGARY TOWN LIBRARY BOARD THAT JANE.
NEED TO NOT BE A– CURRENTLY BE.
ASSIGNED TO THE CALGARY TOWN LIBRARY BOARD AS AN ELECTED.
MEMBER FOR THREE YEARS WHICH.
THE IN-CAMERA CONVERSATION REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL UNDER SECTION 19.1.
UNDER THE LIBERTY OF INFORMATION.
PRIVACY DEFENSE ACT.

>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: THANK.
YOU, ALDERMAN FARRELL YOU'' RE. SECONDLY IN THANK YOU. ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS. ARE WE AGREED? ANY OPPOSED. LUGGED. THAT HAD THE LAST ONE, ALD.
MacLEOD? ALL RIGHT.
>> > > THAT THE VERBAL RECORD.
EMPLOYEE ITEM BE OBTAINED FOR INFO AND ALSO THAT THE.
CONVERSATION WITH RESPECT TO THE.
VERBAL RECORD REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL ACCORDING TO.
AREAS 24.1 (B), ONE, THE.
FREEDOM OF INFO OF PRIVACY DEFENSE ACT.
>> > > Mayor Naheed Nenshi:.
> > YES, YOUR PRAISE. THANK YOU. VERBAL RECORD CONSULTATION OF LAW OF DIGITAL ELECTRONIC.
OR COMPUTER SYSTEM SIGNS TASK FORCE. A GREAT DEAL OF CONSTANTNANCE. ALDERMAN CHABOT, ALDERMAN.
DEMONG, ALDERMAN MAR BE.
SELECTED TO THE RECOGNITION OF DIGITAL ELECTRONIC OR COMPUTER.
SIGNS JOB COMPEL WHICH 2.
A REGARD TO REFERRAL TO CONSIST OF A SUNSET PROVISION IN ADDITION TO.
EXPLANATION RELATIVE TO.
SATISFYING AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT, RETURN TO THE.
2011, MARCH 21 REGULAR MEETING.
> > Mayor Naheed Nenshi: I'' LL. REVIEWED IT TO YOU PRIVATELY LATER ON, ALDERMAN CHABOT. > > OH, IT'' S ONLY 10 O ' CLOCK.

> > WASN ' T ONLY THAT. > > ALDERMAN FARRELL? HODGES– >> > > WE HAVE A SECONDER FOR. > > WITH REGARD TO THE CALGARY PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD THAT JANE.
> > THAT THE SPOKEN REPORT.

As found on YouTube

PEOPLE – SERVICES – IMPACT