> > Mike: THAT ' S YOUR ONE MIN. > > Mike: LET ' S BEGIN WITH SYAM. > > AS An INSTRUCTOR IT ' S A TERRIFIC QUESTION.
> > YOU ' RE RIGHT.AFFORDABILITY IS A BIG CONCERN AND ALSO PEOPLE THAT NEED TO LOAD UP THEIR STORAGE TANK AS WELL AS OBTAIN TO WORK NEED RELIEF. > > Mike: THAT ' S YOUR ONE MIN. > > RESPECTIVELY I DISAGREE WITH SANDY ' S COMMENT ABOUT THE GAS RATES. > > I WOULD SAY TO SANDY ' S FACTOR, RESPECTIVELY, THAT A GREAT DEAL OF FUNCTION HAS GONE INTO RESTORING OUR CELEBRATION. > > AS A TEACHER IT ' S An EXCELLENT INQUIRY.MAKING PROBLEMS SIMPLER BUT I THINK THIS IS A PROBLEM THAT'' S ACROSS THE BOARD IN LOTS UNIVERSITIES SO I THINK THE STRICTER LEGISLATIONS WOULD BE VERY ESSENTIAL. I BELIEVE EDUCATION VERY ESSENTIAL IN SOME OF MY COURSES I REMEMBER REVEALING THE VIDEO CLIPS REGARDING SOME ORGANIZATIONS WHERE MALE ALLIES– >> > > Mike: THAT IS TIME.ONE MIN. BOBBY, IF YOU HAVE A FOLLOW UP CONCERN TO THAT SPECIFIC SUBJECT, PLEASE FIRE AWAY, MY FRIEND. > > I HAVE >> A DIFFERENT TOPIC I DESIRE TO BRING UP. I BELIEVE EVERY ONE OF YOU WOULD BE INTERESTED IN ANSWERING THIS. WHAT BODIES OR INSTITUTIONS DO YOU REALLY FEEL BARE DUTY FOR THE SEWER OVERFLOW? WHAT OUTCOME SHOULD REMAIN IN LOCATION TO MAKE CERTAIN IT DOESN'' T HAPPEN ONCE MORE? > >> SANDY SHAW AS WELL AS EVERYONE WILL CERTAINLY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY.MS.
SHAW. >> > > THE CATASTROPHE OF COUTTS HEAVEN IS SOMETHING THAT WILL CERTAINLY COPE WITH EVERYBODY FOR A LONG PERIOD OF TIME. IT WAS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CALAMITY IN A SENSITIVE AREA. WE KNOW THAT. THERE ARE NOT JUST DID THE ACTUAL SYSTEM FAIL, THE ACTUAL WASTE WATER TREATMENT FAIL. BECAUSE IT IS OLD AND BECAUSE WE REQUIREMENT TO CHANGE IT AND ALSO WE NEED TO SPEND IN EXCELLENT ECO-FRIENDLY FACILITIES, it STOPPED WORKING. IT WAS A FAILING OF THE ACTUAL MECHANICS OF THE SYSTEM. IT WAS A TOTAL FAILING OF THE OVERSIGHT ROUTINE NOT ONLY AT THE MUNICIPAL LEVEL.THE CITY OF
HAMILTON DID WHAT THEY DID. IT IS QUITE CLEAR. WE KNOW WHAT THEY DID. IT IS MY ROLE AT THE DISTRICT TO UNDERSTAND THE PROVINCE WAS ALSO IN CHARGE OF OVERSIGHT. THEY'' RE THE ULTIMATE OVERSIGHT BODY AND THE DISTRICT KNEW PRECISELY AT THE SAME TIME AS THE CITY RECOGNIZED AND ALSO THEY ADDITIONALLY DID NOT REVEAL TO THE PEOPLE OF HAMILTON. SO MY SOLUTION TO THIS WAS THAT I HAVE RELOCATED THE CUTES PARADISE LIABILITY ACT TO SEE TO IT THE DISTRICT HAS A TASK TO REVEAL NOT SIMPLY IN HAMILTON BUT THROUGHOUT THE PROVINCE.FURTHER TO THAT WE NEED A
PROVINCIAL WATER METHOD TO APPEARANCE AT WAYS TO PROTECT OUR WATER AS WELL AS WATER WAYS AND ALSO WE NEED AN FINANCIAL INVESTMENT AS WELL AS GREAT ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY INFRASTRUCTURE TO ENSURE THIS DOESN'' T TAKE PLACE IN HAMILTON OR ANY >> COMMUNITY. > > THANKS QUITE FOR THAT. MS. SANDHILL, YOUR RESPONSE>. > > I WOULD REHASH OUR MUNICIPALITIES HAVE TO PUT STRICTER MEASURES IN AREA. I ASSUME I WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE SANDY BRINGING UP THAT BILL. I WISH SOMETHING CONCRETE COMES OUT OF THAT. I ASSUME AT THE END OF THE DAY IN A CITY LIKE HAMILTON WHICH IS CALLED A CITY OF WATERFALLS. WE HAVE NUMEROUS WATER BODIES. I THINK MORE STRINGENT STEPS ARE REQUIRED THROUGH REGULATIONS. AND ALSO I BELIEVE MUNICIPALITIES WILL CERTAINLY NEED TO BE FAR MORE RESPONSIBLE MOVING ON. AND ALSO I THINK WE HAVE A MUNICIPAL ELECTION COMING UP TO MAKE SURE THAT COULD BE AN ISSUE THAT REQUIRES TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT THERE TOO. >> > > MR. > > WE NEED TO HOLD THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE FOR THAT. I PRAISE SANDY'' S FUNCTION TOWARDS THAT RIGHT FROM MY PERSONAL SIDE AND FROM CELEBRATION SIDE. AND ALSO NOT ONLY THAT.WHEN YOU ASSUME BEYOND THAT ' S A SYSTEMIC ISSUE. WITH THIS RURAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. THEY'' RE NOT TRANSPARENT WHEN WE ARE LOOKING AT NOT ONLY AT THIS ISSUE. THERE IS A TYPE OF PREJUDICE FOR ALL OF THESE THINGS. WHAT IS HAPPENING? WE DEMAND TO ASK THEM. MAKE THINGS EVEN MORE TRANSPARENT. WE REQUIREMENT TO KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON. THANKS. IT IS A MY RESPONSE. IT'' S A FANTASTIC >> CONCERN. > > TO ALL OF YOU, THANKS REALLY MUCH FOR YOUR ACTIONS FOR THAT. WE WILL CERTAINLY CONTINUE NOW WITH OUR NEXT MEDIA PANELIST UPCOMING UP FROM 900CHML BACK FOR A SECOND NIGHT, RICK ZAMPERIN.THE STAKE IS YOURS.
> > MANY THANKS FOR HAVING ME >> BACK. THANKS FOR COMING OUT. IF THEY ' RE PAR TAKING IN ADVANCED SURVEYS, WE KNOW THAT MANY PEOPLE IN HAMILTON HAVE A CHOICE TO MAKE JUNE 2ND OR EARLIER. THIS IS AN CRUCIAL PROCEDURE. THE ECO-FRIENDLY EVENT HAS BEEN AROUND FOR FORTY YEARS FOLLOWING YEAR. IT ' S HELD ONE SEAT IN ALL THAT TIME AND ALSO CURRENT LEADER MIKE SCHREINER. CONTAINER YOU TALK TO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ECO-FRIENDLY CELEBRATION? WHY SHOULD ONTARIO VOTERS CONSIDER An ECO-FRIENDLY ON ELECTION DAY? > > I WOULD ARGUE IN 2 VARIOUS MEANS. ONE CONSIDER OUR DOCUMENT. ADMINISTRATION DOCUMENT NOT JUST AT AN ACTIVIST RECORD. THAT IS SOMETHING WHICH MADE ME TO STAND WITH MIKE SCHREINER. THINGS ONE PARTICIPANT HOW MUCH WE ARE ABLE TO ATTAIN. TAKE A LOOK AT THAT. I WOULD MOTIVATE ALL OF THOSE TO TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT OUR FEDERAL MPS ARE PERFORMING IN THE PARLIAMENT.MIKE AND ALSO MS. MAY. WHAT THEY ARE DOING. IN GOVERNANCE ALSO WE ARE
EXTREMELY SERIOUS. THAT ' S COMING BACK TO MY OPENING STATEMENT. THE INQUIRY THE WOMAN ASKED, WE CONTAINER NOT BE ALWAYS ANGRY. I REMEMBER I WAS AN ANGRY YOUNG MALE. OUR PARTY MATURED. I WOULD SAY TRUST United States. WE WILL CERTAINLY DELIVER. > > FOLLOW UP TO THAT IS: LOTS ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY MPS, MPPS >>, HAVE SAID THAT ONTARIO ' S ECO-FRIENDLY ECONOMY HAS TO BE ACCELERATED.THE OTHER 2 CONTAINER FOLLOW UP TOO.
HOW DO WE DO THAT AND ALSO ACCELERATE ONTARIO ' S ECONOMIC CLIMATE TO MEET THAT GREEN ECONOMIC SITUATION IN THE'YEARS TO FIND? > > I WOULD INCLUDE A WAY THAT WE HAVE TO DISCOVER NEW OPTION TO OUR OLD TROUBLES. TO MAKE SURE THAT CLIMATE ADJUSTMENT OR ENVIRONMENT ECONOMY IS A SIGNIFICANT OPPORTUNITY FOR ONTARIO. TO TAKE THE LEADERSHIP FUNCTION WORLDWIDE LIKE WHEN IT CONCERNS EVS OR ANYTHING. WE CONTAINER INCREASE OUR ECONOMICS SO MUCH. > > WE WILL CERTAINLY BE OPENING THE TOPIC FOR DISCUSSION. I SAW A HAND FROM >> MS. SHAW. > > MANY THANKS. FOR THE LAST FOUR YEARS I SAT IN THE LEGISLATURE. WHEN IT COMES TO THE CLIMATE, MIKE SCHREINER RESTS REALLY CLOSE TO ME SO WE SHARE IDEAS.WE SHARED OUTRAGE AT SOME OF THE POINTS THIS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS DONE. I APPRECIATE WHAT THEY HAVE TO BRING BUT IF WE WISH TO GO ON A FEW OF THINGS SYAM SIMPLY SPOKE ABOUT, A NEW GREEN ECONOMY. WE NEED A NEW FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. WE DEMAND TO ELECT PEOPLE THAT HAVE A REALLY GOOD SHOT AT FORMING FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND I BELIEVE WITH THE ONTARIO NEW DEMOCRATS WITH 40 INCUMBENT MPS WE ' RE IN A GOOD PLACEMENT TO PERFORM THAT. WE HAVE PUT OUT GREEN NEW BARGAIN WHICH IS ENVIRONMENT, JOBS'AND ALSO JUSTICE. IT ' S A REALLY POSSIBLE VIBRANT STRATEGY TO DO JUST THAT.ADDRESS THE setting and the economic climate. AND CONSTRUCT AN ECONOMIC SITUATION, A SUCCESSFUL ECONOMIC CLIMATE, AND ALSO WE PUT THAT
OUT FOR 2 YEARS AND ALSO I ' M VERY PLEASED WITH IT AND I WOULD SAY WE APPRECIATE EVERYONE ' S IDEAS. WHEN IT COMES TO CLIMATE IT IS NOT A PARTISAN CONCERN. WE NEED EVERYBODY WITH GOOD WHY GETS ON THE TABLE AS WELL AS WE DEMAND A BRAND-NEW GOVERNMENT THAT TAKES THIS SERIOUSLY. > > I WOULD LIKE TO ADD FIRST OF ALL THE IDEA THAT NDP WON 40 SEATS >> IN THE LAST ELECTION SO THEY CANISTER SUCCESS AGAIN. I THINK NDP HASN ' T PLAYED A REALLY RELIABLE FUNCTION AS OFFICIAL RESISTANCE IN THE LAST 2'YEARS DURING MY ROLE IN ONTARIO LIBERAL EVENT. I HAVE SEEN OUR CELEBRATION STANDING UP TO DOUG FORD EVERY TIP OF THE WAY ALMOST HAVING FUN THE OFFICIAL OPPOSITION FUNCTION IN TERMS OF OUR ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY. ONCE AGAIN LIKE I STATED WE HAVE TRANSIT THAT IS GOING TO TAKE 400,000 CARS OFF THE ROADS.WE ARE GOING TO CUT CARBON AS WELL AS METHANE AIR POLLUTION BY GREATER THAN 50 %BY 2030. AND WE ARE GOING TO PRODUCE
25,000 ECO-FRIENDLY JOBS AND OFFER NEW ASSISTANCE AND TRAINING FOR WORKERS. AS WELL AS SOME OF THESE PREPARES AS WELL AS IDEAS HAVE BEEN OPPOSED BY NDP BY CANCELLING CARBON TAX OBLIGATION REFUND TO 75% OF HOUSEHOLDS THAT NDP IS INCREASING EXPENSE TO ONTARIO FAMILIES BY AN STANDARD OF BUCK 500. NDP ' S PLEDGE TO RETURN TO CAP AS WELL AS PROFESSION WOULD PUT ONTARIO THROUGH ITS FOURTH CARBON PRICES SYSTEM IN FOUR YEARS. > > Mike: WE WOULD LIKE SANDY TO REPLY TO THIS PRIOR TO WE HAVE TO RELOCATE ON. > > I WOULD HAVE TO SAY THE LIBERAL AND CONSERVATIVES >> ' PLAN FOR THE ENVIRONMENT HAS SHOWN TO FAIL.THERE WAS NOTHING WORSE THAN THE LIBERALS >> MEDDLING IN THE SYSTEM AND ALSO SIGNING PRIVATIZED CONTRACTS THAT DID INCREASE THE PRICE OF ENERGY.
WE ' RE STILL PAYING THE RATE FOR THE LIBERALS ' MEDDLING IN THE ENERGY SYSTEM. IT NEEDS TO BE STATED THAT INDIVIDUALS OF ONTARIO SUBSIDIZED PRIVATE POWER FIRMS TO THE SONG OF$7' BILLION A YEAR BASED ON SEVERAL OF THE MEDDLING THE GOVERNMENT HAS DONE. $7 BILLION SUBSIDIZING PRIVATE HYDRO PROVIDERS. MORE THAN WE INVEST IN LASTING CARE. THEIR DOCUMENT ON THE SETTING IS NOT CREDIBLE. > > Mike: FINAL LAST COMMENTS. > > PROCEED. > > I RAPIDLY WISHED TO CONTRIBUTE TO SANDY ' S FACTOR, DON ' T NEGLECT THE TRADITION OF CLOSING OUT THE >> COAL PLANTS WHICH ARE SO HELPFUL FOR >> OUR ATMOSPHERE> AND ALSO DON ' T NEGLECT THE GREEN BELTS. THAT WERE DEVELOPED BY ONTARIO LIBERAL PARTIES. > > FINAL WORD TO YOU. > > I WOULD SAY WE REQUIREMENT TO DOUBLE THE SIZE OF THE ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY BELT AND MUST CONSIST OF THE BLUE BELT. > > THANKS SIGNIFICANTLY FOR THAT.WE WILL ADVANCE WITH OUR QUESTIONS FROM OUR MEDIA PANEL FROM >> WIRE 14 ' S THE HAMILTON NETWORK, VAL COLE WITH An INQUIRY AMONG OUR VIEWERS SENT BY TWEETING United States @ CABLE TELEVISION 14 OR THROUGH E-MAIL [email protected]. VAL. YOU ARE UP. > > THANKS A LOT. THIS QUESTION IS FROM RICK'. IT IS TO EVERY ONE OF OUR CANDIDATES TONIGHT. WHAT IS YOUR CELEBRATION ' S PLACEMENT CONCERNING HAMILTON ' S CITY BOARD ' S CHOICE TO RESPECT THE COMMUNITY ' S NEED FOR A COMPANY URBAN BOUNDARY? > > Mike: WE WILL START WITH MS. SANDHILL AND ALSO GO THROUGH THE REMAINDER OF THE CANDIDATES. > >'THAT ' S An EXCELLENT INQUIRY AS WELL AS I WOULD SAY THAT EXTREMELY FIRST CONFERENCE THAT I HAD AS QUICKLY AS I ENDED UP BEING THE CANDIDATE WAS AGRICULTURE> FEDERATION OF ONTARIO.WHEN I WAS DOOR KNOCKING IN DUNDAS AMONG THE BIGGEST MOMENT COMING OUT EVERY HOME HAS A SIGN OF STOP THE SPRAWL. OUR PARTY ' S PERSPECTIVE AS WELL AS PLAN SYSTEM YOU ' LL VIEW AS WELL THAT WE REGARD MUNICIPALITIES AND ALSO THEIR JURISDICTIONS AND WE ARE GOING TO OPT FOR WHAT OUR COUNCILLORS HAVE DETERMINED. NO URBAN SPRAWL. WE ARE PREPARATION TO CONSTRUCT THOUSANDS'OF HOUSES TO PREVENT THE REAL ESTATE CRISIS WE ARE DEALING WITH RIGHT CURRENTLY. AND WE ARE GOING TO CONSTRUCT THOSE HOMES WITHIN THOSE BOUNDARIES.ONTARIO LIBERAL EVENT DOES REGARD MUNICIPALITIES ' CHOICE TO GO FORWARD WITH THAT SAID STRATEGY. > > WE NEED TO ICE UP THE BOUNDARIES AND ALSO CONSTRUCT 1.5 MILLION HOUSES. RATIONALE OUGHT TO BE– THE FOCUS SHOULD GET ON HOMES, NOT HIGHWAYS. STOP THE SPRAWL IS VERY, EXTREMELY CRUCIAL FOR ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY PARTY. MIKE WAS HERE SUSTAINING QUIT' THE SPRAWL MINUTE. HE IS GOING TO BE BACK BELOW >> ONCE MORE. ICING UP URBAN BORDERS IS ABSOLUTELY IMPORTANT TO US. > > WONDERFUL STUFF. MS. SHAW. > > I ' M HAPPY TO HAVE STOOD SIDE BY SIDE WITH THE QUIT SPRAWL MOVEMENT BELOW IN HAMILTON.I NEED TO SAY IT ' S A MOTION MADE HERE IN HAMILTON THAT IS DISPERSING ACROSS ONTARIO. OTHER COMMUNITIES LIKE HALTON, OTHER COMMUNITIES ARE STANDING >> TO THIS GOVERNMENT TO STOP THE >> URBAN BOUNDARY EXPANSION. AS WELL AS WHY IS THIS SUCH A BIG DEAL? IT ' S A BIG OFFER BECAUSE WE OUGHT TO NOT BE STRUCTURE ON AGRICULTURAL LAND. WE SHED 175 ACRES OF FARMLAND EVERYDAY. AND ALSO WE SAW DURING COVID HOW IMPORTANT OUR FOOD SECURITY SYSTEM IS. WHY ARE WE BUILDING ON AGRICULTURAL LAND? WHY ARE WE BUILDING IN AREAS THAT ARE GOING TO EXPENSE TAXPAYERS EVEN MORE SINCE THEY NEED TO ASSISTANCE THE FRAMEWORK, SPEND FOR THE SEWERS AS WELL AS WATER LINES THAT ADVANCEMENT DOESN ' T SPEND FOR. THAT ' S WHY IT ' S A BIG DEAL AS WELL AS FINALLY WE UNDERSTAND THAT URBAN LIMIT DEVELOPMENT HAS ACTUALLY BEEN CALLED ONTARIO ' S TAR SANDS. IT WILL DRIVE UP EXHAUSTS. THIS IS A BIG OFFER BUT I WOULD SAY WE HAVE SEEN A GOVERNMENT DOESN ' T RESPECT ANY DISTRICT ' S DECISION. > > Mike: THAT IS TIME. THANKS SIGNIFICANTLY. BECAUSE OF TIME, WE DO HAVE TO RELOCATE ON. THANKS REALLY MUCH. WE GOT THE BUSIEST GUY IN MEDIA NOW, SCOT RADLEY.WE GOT TO GET HIM BACK TO THE BULLDOGS VIDEO GAME. YOU ARE'UP FOR THE HAMILTON VIEWER. > > THIS CONCERN IS FOR MS. SANDHILL. WE HAD ANOTHER CAPTURING UP ON THE MOUNTAIN THIS WEEKEND. IT WAS NOT EXTREMELY LONG AGO >> HAMILTON AUTHORITIES SAY THE VARIETY OF HANDGUNS ON THE ROADS WAS ALARMING WAS THEIR WORD. YOUR LEADER CLAIMED HE WISH TO BAN HANDGUNS IN THE PROVINCE.
THE CHIEF OF POLICES WERE TESTIFYING IN OTTAWA AT A BOARD AS WELL AS CLAIMED IT IS NOT LEGAL HANDGUNS THAT ARE THE ISSUE. IT IS UNLAWFUL PISTOLS THAT ARE COMING ACROSS THE BOUNDARY ILLEGALLY UNDOUBTEDLY. THE BOUNDARIES OUR GOVERNMENT JURISDICTION. THE CRIMINAL CODE WHICH HAS REGULATIONS VERSUS ILLEGAL WEAPONS IS FEDERAL JURISDICTION. WHAT ' S YOUR DUTY IN THIS? > > IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE CAPTURINGS THAT HAPPENED, MY LITTLE GIRL LIVES IN MIDTOWN TORONTO.EVERY TIME I COME ACROSS A FIRING I ' M SO SCARED. I BELIEVE IT ' S AN EVERYDAY OCCURRENCE IN GTA ESPECIALLY IN SOME AREAS AS WELL AS HAMILTON AS WELL. I THINK SHUTTING THAT LOOPHOLE OPENING OF HANDGUNS RESTRICTION WHERE WE CAN WORK AND I ASSUME THIS IS SOMETHING OUR LEADER CLAIMED IN THE SYSTEM THAT WILL BE WORKING WITH EACH OTHER WITH THE FEDERAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BECAUSE THERE REQUIRES TO BE IMMEDIATE ACTIVITIES THAT REQUIRED TO BE TAKEN RIGHT NOW BECAUSE'OF THE AMOUNT OF SHOOTINGS HAPPENING EVERY OTHER DAY. WHEN HE ANNOUNCED THIS PARTICULAR POLICY ACTION, and also SAME POINT I WOULD REPEAT THE SAME POINT WHAT STEVEN DEL DUCA CLAIMED. THAT A PERSON FATALITY IS ONE A LOT OF FOR ANY COMMUNITY MEMBER WHO LOSES THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS, WHO LOSES THEIR BOY OR LITTLE GIRL. WE REQUIREMENT TO TAKE PROMPT ACTIVITY. I BELIEVE THIS STRATEGY WAS APPLAUDED BY LOTS OF PEOPLE. > > MR. RADLY FOLLOW UP CONCERN. > > WE HAVE A LAW IN PLACE.IF A CRIMINAL WANTS TO TAKE THE CHANCE TO GO TO PRISON FOR AS MUCH AS 25 YEARS FOR USING A HANDGUN EVEN IF YOU WERE TO PUT IN PROVINCIAL REGULATIONS, IS THAT GOING TO HINDER ANY PERSON AS A 2ND SIMULTANEOUS CRIMINAL OFFENSE THAT THEY ' RE GOING TO BE CHARGED WITH GOING TO MAKE ANYBODY QUIT TRYING TO USE THE WEAPON IF THEY WERE GOING TO USE IT ANYWAY TO TAKE THE DANGER OF GETTING CAUGHT? HOW IS THIS GOING TO QUIT ANYONE >>? > > I BELIEVE BECAUSE THE GUNS THAT ARE ORIGINATING FROM THE BORDER BUT THE GUNS THAT ARE WITHIN CANADA THEY HAD BEEN USED IN THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES THAT ARE TAKING PLACE ALMOST EVERY OTHER DAY. I THINK IF IMMEDIATE ACTION IS NOT TAKEN BY THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT THIS WILL CERTAINLY CONTINUE.I THINK ALL OF THESE CASES TAKING AREA WITHIN'ONTARIO, WITHIN THE BIG CITIES IN ONTARIO. ONTARIO DOES REQUIREMENT TO TAKE CONCRETE ACTION. EVEN IF IT ' S SOME COMPONENTS OF IT IS FEDERAL JURISDICTION. HE WILL COLLABORATE WITH THE FEDERAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO PUT STRICTER MEASURES IN POSITION. > > THANKS SIGNIFICANTLY FOR THAT TOPIC. IT ' S A WARM ONE NOW. I RECOGNIZE WE WANT TO GET RIGHT INTO DEBATE WITH THIS. > > I DESIRE TO ADD SOMETHING EXTREMELY INDIVIDUAL TO ME.GUN ISSUE IS VERY INDIVIDUAL. I LOST TWO OF MY TRAINEES TO GUN PHYSICAL VIOLENCE IN THE LAST 2 YEARS IN IOWA WHERE I INVEST CONSIDERABLE TIME MENTOR AND ALSO WORKING THERE. IT IS NOT REALLY– I ' M CERTAIN WEAPON CONTROL AND FEDERAL AND ALSO RURAL FUNCTION IS EXTREMELY CRUCIAL. IN ADDITION TO THAT THERE IS THE DUTY OF PUBLIC AWARENESS AND ALSO DESTITUTION IS AN ISSUE.ALL OF THOSE POINTS INCORPORATE WITH EACH OTHER. WE MUST HAVE A VERY >> SERIOUS UNDERSTANDING WHY GUN PHYSICAL VIOLENCE IS'HAPPENING. > > MS. SHAW. > > YOU ' RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT ABOUT >> ILLEGAL HANDGUNS. MY GRANDPA USED TO SAY
A LOCK ONLY SHUTS OUT AN STRAIGHTFORWARD INDIVIDUAL. THAT USES IN THIS SCENARIO. EVERYBODY IN ONTARIO DESERVES TO BE ABLE TO FEELING SAFE IN THEIR COMMUNITY, SAFE IN THEIR HOUSE. ATTENDING TO as well as policing'WEAPON VIOLENCE THAT ' S An ELEMENT. ANOTHER REALLY IMPORTANT ELEMENT IS LOOKING AT THE ORIGIN OF THIS TYPE OF VIOLENCE.
THERE WAS A REPORT COMMISSIONED TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE ORIGIN CAUSES OF VIOLENCE AS WELL AS IT SAT ON THE SHELF AND ALSO HASN ' T BEEN >> ESTABLISHED AND >> WE HAVE THE FORD GOVERNMENT THAT HAS CUT PROGRAMS IN COMMUNITIES RIGHT IN SOME OF THE LOW INCOME COMMUNITIES IN OUR URBAN AREAS THAT WE ' RE DOING ALL KINDS OF FUNCTION TO KEEP CHILDREN OFF THE STREET AS WELL AS KEEP GUN VIOLENCE DOWN. IT IS THE AREA SUSTAINS THAT WE NEED TO ADDRESS THIS TERRIBLE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. I AM SO SORRY TO'BECOME AWARE OF THAT.THAT ' S A DREADFUL STORY. I AM REALLY SORRY. > > Mike: FINAL COMMENTS. > > I DESIRED TO RAPIDLY CONTRIBUTE TO BOTH OF WHAT MY COLLEAGUES HAVE CLAIMED RIGHT HERE. I ASSUME CRIMINALIZATION AS WELL AS RACIALINGS OF NOT JUST HARDSHIP BUT MARGINALIZED POPULACE– THAT PLAYS A BIG ROLE IN THE JUSTICE GLOBE. I ASSUME IT ' S EXTREMELY VITAL THAT WE'PUT MENTAL HEALTH SUPPORTS SOLUTIONS IN POSITION AS WELL AS WELL AS IN ONTARIO LIBERAL PARTY ' S STRATEGY YOU SEE THERE ARE NUMEROUS INCENTIVES FOR MENTAL HEALTH ASSISTANCE SOLUTIONS, FOR YOUTH, FOR INDIVIDUALS– CHILDREN IN COLLEGE TOO SINCE I BELIEVE WE REQUIREMENT TO LOCATE THE SOURCE >> OF THE TROUBLE. >> > > A SUBJECT THAT WE ARE ALL REALLY CONCERNED OF AS MOMS AND DAD AS WELL AS, CERTAINLY, OUR CHILDREN. THANKS EXTREMELY MUCH FOR THAT. BACK FROM CHCH FOR HIS SECOND GO AROUND, AL SWEENEY.THE FLOOR IS YOURS. > > HI. MS. SHAW I WISH TO QUICKLY ATTEND TO A CONCERN TO YOU ADHERING TO UP SOMETHING YOU WERE SPEAKING ABOUT EARLIER. THIS IS YOUR REGARD FOR MUNICIPALITIES. WHICH IS FINE. BUT IF YOU ARE CHOSEN'TO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WOULD YOU IN FACT GENERATE LEGISLATIVE CHANGE TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT THE PROVINCE CAN ' T OVERRULE A TOWN ANYTIME IT DOESN ' T LIKE WHAT THE DISTRICT IS DOING? OR SEND IT TO THE PLANNING >> APPEAL TRIBUNAL RECOGNIZING THE PREPARING TRIBUNAL COULD DO THE HELP THEM. > > THERE ' S 2 PIECES TO THAT QUESTION AND IT ' S REALLY SO TIMELY DUE TO THE FORD GOVERNMENT AND THE MEANS HE ' S SIMPLY TRULY BIG FOOTED EVERY ONE OF OUR MUNICIPALITIES. WE SAW DURING THE REALLY FIRST POINT I SAW IN QUEEN ' S PARK WAS HIM CUTTING COMMON COUNCIL IN HALF. WHEN HE WAS TRYING TO BRING IN THE NOT WITH STANDING STIPULATION, THERE ARE INDIVIDUALS ON THE LAWN ALL NIGHT LONG. THAT KIND OF DISRESPECT IS SOMETHING WE DON ' T SHARE.OUR LEADERS SERVED AS A MUNICIPAL COUNCILLOR HERE IN HAMILTON AS WELL AS SHE AREAS AS WELL AS UNDERSTANDS THAT DUTY. IN OUR SYSTEM WE WOULD BRING IN REGULATIONS TO AVOID GOVERNMENT FROM MEDDLING BECAUSE REGARD. >> WHEN IT PERTAINS TO THE ONTARIO LAND TRIBUNAL WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND WHY ARE COMMUNITIES NOT HAVING THE CONTROL? WHY ARE THEIR CHOICES BEING SO OVERRIDED AT THE ONTARIO LAND TRIBUNAL? WE NEED TO BRING EQUILIBRIUM INTO THAT LAND TRIBUNAL'TO MAKE CERTAIN IT IS NOT JUST DEVELOPERS THAT HAVE THE HEFTY HAND THERE AND ALSO CHOOSING FOR OUR COMMUNITIES AND ALSO DISTRICTS SINCE REALLY IT ' S OUR COUNCILLORS, THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE CLOSEST TO THAT DEGREE OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT UNDERSTAND WHAT WE REQUIREMENT IN OUR COMMUNITIES. > > FOLLOW UP QUESTION TO THAT? > > A VARIOUS SUBJECT. LET ' S DISCUSS COVID MOMENTARILY. WE ' VE BEEN LIVING WITH THIS FOR MORE THAN 2 YEARS. WE DON ' T REALLY KNOW WHETHER IT ' S GOING AWAY, WHATEVER IS HAPPENING. NOW WE GOT THIS APE POX. WE SAW TERRIFIC SOCIAL TURMOIL THROUGHOUT THE PAST 2 YEARS.PART OF IT APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN INDIVIDUALS REALLY FELT DECISIONS WERE BEING MADE WITHOUT THEM OBTAINING ADEQUATE DETAILS ON THESE DECISIONS. DOCTORS WERE MAKING DECISIONS. THEY ELECTED POLITICAL LEADERS TO MAKE THESE DECISIONS AND ALSO THE PHYSICIANS APPEAR TO BE CHOOSING. MS. SHAW. IF WE HAD ANOTHER PANDEMIC LIKE THAT AS WELL AS THE DOCTORS CAME TO YOU AS WELL AS STATED WE OUGHT TO SHUTDOWN THE ECONOMY >>, WE OUGHT TO TAKE CHILDREN OUT OF >> INSTITUTION. WE NEEDS TO TAKE PEOPLE WHO ARE ON A WAITLIST FOR HEALTH CARES AS WELL AS PRESS THEM ASIDE. WHAT WOULD YOU CLAIM? > > I THINK THAT WE ALL THOUGH THIS WAS AN EXTRAORDINARY PANDEMIC WHICH– THERE WAS TIMES WHEN WE KNEW WE WERE IN THIS TOGETHER.
I BELIEVE WE HAVE TO RECALL AND CONSIDER HOW FRIGHTENED ALL OF US WERE AS WELL AS HOW LITTLE WE KNEW AT THE TIME. IT WAS UNFOLDING SO QUICKLY THAT THE PANDEMIC WAS UNFOLDING SO QUICKLY. WHEN WE COULDN ' T EVEN GET INJECTIONS, WE HAD TO GO BACK TO. WE COULDN ' T OBTAIN EXAMINATIONS. WE HAD WHAT I WOULD PHONE CALL A LEADERSHIP VACUUM WITH THE PREMIER. SO MANY TIMES PEOPLE TELEPHONE CALL MY OFFICE NOT KNOWING WHAT THE GUIDELINES WERE.NOT KNOWING WHERE THEY CONTAINER OBTAIN An INJECTION OR A TEST. INDIVIDUALS WERE FRANTIC AND ALSO WE GOTTEN THOSE CALLS. >> THERE WAS NOT POLITICAL LEADERSHIP REVEALED IN ALL. AS WELL AS THIS GOVERNMENT EVEN PICKED NOT TO LISTEN TO THEIR PROFESSIONAL PANEL. WE DEMAND A GOVERNMENT, WE NEED A LEADER THAT WOULD ACTION UP AND SHOW LEADERSHIP AND NOT HIDE BEHIND OTHER MEDICAL ADVICE AS WELL AS LISTEN. > > MR. SWEENY ASKED 2 CONCERNS. WE WANT BOTH PROSPECTS TO RESPONSE TO THOSE QUICKLY. WE WILL CERTAINLY BEGIN WITH MS. SANDHILL REGARDING'MUNICIPALITIES AS WELL AS BACK TO THE COVID QUESTIONS.PLEASE GO ON. > > DISTRICTS, I WOULD REHASH THAT YES, MUNICIPALITIES DO HAVE THEIR OWN JURISDICTIONS BUT AT THE VERY SAME TIME THERE ARE PARTICULAR ISSUES, FOR EXAMPLE, REAL ESTATE. WE ARE INTENDING TO FUNCTION WITH THE DISTRICTS TO FREE UP COMMERCIAL LAND TO DEVELOP REAL ESTATE. WE DEMAND ASSISTANCE AT THE SAME TIME WE ARE SUPPLYING FUNDING. SO IN REQUISITES OF COVID-19, YES, A COMPLETE VACUUM OF MANAGEMENT LIKE SANDY STATED BUT AT THE EXACT SAME TIME I WOULD SAY THERE WAS A COMPLETE ABSENCE OF ACTIVITY ON COMPONENT OF RESISTANCE ALSO. THEY DID NOT HOLD DOUG FORD TO ACCOUNT FOR THE KIND OF ACTIONS HE WAS TAKING.PPE GOING TO PRIVATE SCHOOLS, NOT THE PUBLIC EDUCATION AND LEARNING SYSTEM. THEY WERE DISPARITIES IN VACCINE DISTRIBUTION. I WILL CERTAINLY ONCE MORE COME BACK TO THE INTERSEC INTERSECTIONALITY. >> THIS PANDEMIC WAS THE HARDEST ON INDIVIDUALS FROM MARGINALIZED AREAS AND ALSO THIS HIGHLIGHTED EXISTING DISPARITIES AS WELL AS ENHANCED THOSE VARIATIONS. > > WE ARE MISSING OUT ON THE GOVERNMENT AGENT HERE. BOTH CONCERNS WOULD HAVE BEEN– NEED TO HAVE BEEN ASKING THE CONCERN TO THE COMPUTER REP. I ' M SURE THAT HE HAD REASONS NOT TO PROGRAM UP RIGHT HERE. THIS COULD BE ONE OF THE REASONS. ANYHOW PICKING TO– MUST NOT BE A COMPLEX QUESTION. AS An INDIVIDUAL, A GUY OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, I DON ' T BELIEVE THAT SHOULD BE EVEN AN OPTION. THE ISSUE WITH WHAT WE FACED LAST TWO YEARS NOT ONLY IN CANADA IN THE UNITED STATES, AROUND THE WORLD, IS HOW THEY TOOK CARE OF THE DETAILS. HOW IT IS DISTRIBUTED TO THE GENERAL PUBLICS AND ALSO HOW THE MEDIA PREDICTS THE MEANS IN WHICH WE MANAGED THE CIRCUMSTANCE WAS A MAJOR CONCERN FROM MY PERSPECTIVE AS A COMMUNICATIONS EXPERT AND DEALING WITH THE PUPIL. I THINK THERE WAS> A MISCOMMUNICATION FROM EVERYBODY, FROM THE POLITICAL SIDE, FROM THE MEDIA SIDE FROM EVERYWHERE.CREATED A COMPLICATION WHICH COMPLICATION PRODUCED THE ISSUE. THANKS. > > BOTH 2 LARGE TOPICS THERE.
> > MR. > > WE DEMAND TO HOLD THE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE FOR THAT. > > I WOULD ADD IN A MEANS THAT WE HAVE TO FIND NEW SERVICE TO OUR OLD ISSUES. > > REMARKABLE STUFF. > > I THINK BECAUSE THE GUNS THAT ARE COMING FROM THE BORDER BUT THE GUNS THAT ARE WITHIN CANADA THEY HAD BEEN USED IN THE CRIMINAL OFFENSES THAT ARE OCCURRING ALMOST EVERY OTHER DAY. > > MR. SWEENY ASKED 2 INQUIRIES.> > THE LAST 4 YEARS, IT HAS BEEN CUT, CUT, CUT. > > WE REQUIREMENT TO INVEST$6.5 BILLION TO TREAT ELDERS WITH SELF-RESPECT THEY DESERVE INCLUDING INVESTING IN LASTING TREATMENT, ACTIVATING STANDARD TREATMENT, INCREASING HOUSE TREATMENT AND A PERMANENT WAGE BOOST FOR PSWS. > > THIS IS ACTUALLY TO ALL THREE OF YOU.
> > Mike: THANK YOU TO ALL THE PROSPECTS FOR THOSE RESPONSES TO BOBBY ' S SECONDLY CONCERN. > > WE DEMAND TO INVEST$6.5 BILLION TO TREAT SENIOR CITIZENS WITH DIGNITY THEY DESERVE INCLUDING INVESTING IN LONG-LASTING TREATMENT, ACTIVATING CRITERION TREATMENT, INCREASING RESIDENCE CARE AND ALSO A LONG-TERM WAGE RISE FOR PSWS. > > I ' LL BE INTERESTED TO HEAR WHAT YOU CLAIM ABOUT THIS. > > MS. SANDHILL. > > SO I ASSUME IT IS 12 DEATHS WE HAVE SEEN ON OUR HIGHWAYS.WE NEED TO ENSURE OUR VULNERABLE ROAD USERS, OUR PEDESTRIANS– >> > > Mike: MS. SHAW, THAT IS YOUR TIME. WE HAVE TO CONTINUE. WE LIKE TO OBTAIN AS MANY INQUIRIES AS WE CANISTER. PLEASE KEEP YOUR INQUIRIES TO POINT AND ALSO ALSO TO OUR CANDIDATES, YOUR SOLUTION TO A QUICK POINT. BACK FROM CBC, BOBBY HRISTOVA. >> > > THIS IS FOR SANDY SHAW. HAMILTON'' S STATUES AS WELL AS MONUMENTS THINKING OF RENAMING DUNDAS ROAD. THIS RIDING HAS A NEIGHBORHOOD NAMED DUNDAS. WOULD YOU TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION RENAMING IT? >> > > LET ME RESPONSE THAT LIKE THIS.NONE PEOPLE CAN MODIFICATION THE BACKGROUND THAT WE HAVE INHERITED. A FEW OF THE BACKGROUND HURTS. WHEN WE CONSIDER THE BACKGROUND OF ENSLAVEMENT IN NORTH AMERICA IT ' S DIFFICULT TO ENVISION WHEN WE CONSIDER'THE MEANS WE DEALT WITH OUR ABORIGINAL AREAS IN OUR PROVINCE. WE ARE REVEALING UNMARKED GRAVES. IN FORMER RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONS. WE HAVE A PAINFUL BACKGROUND WE NEED TO ADDRESS. SO WHILE WE CANISTER'' T ADJUSTMENT OUR HISTORY WE CONTAINER ADJUSTMENT THE BACKGROUND WE WANT'TO LEAVE BEHIND. THAT ' S FOR US TO BESIDE. I UNDERSTAND DUNDAS IS A COMMUNITY THAT ENGAGED SUPPORTIVE LOVING NEIGHBORHOOD MEMBERS. I WOULD SAY THAT ANY CHOICE ABOUT DUNDAS THAT REQUIRES TO BE MADE BY THE INDIVIDUALS OF DUNDAS. >> > > YOUR RESPONSE >>? > > I WOULD SAY YES, WE REQUIREMENT TO BRING THE COMMUNITIES IN EXAMINATION WITH THIS. THE MAJORITY OF THE PLAN WE HAVE FOR ONTARIO LIBERAL CELEBRATION IT TAKES A DIVERSITY INCORPORATION LENS INTO ACCOUNT IN NEARLY ALL OF OUR POLICIES.I THINK NO ISSUE
WHAT THE PLAN IS BASED ON THE JURISDICTION IF IT ' S A COMMUNITY JURISDICTION OR HOW MUNICIPAL AND PROVINCIAL CONTAINER COLLABORATE ON THIS SPECIFIC SUBJECT. I THINK THAT WOULD BE VERY VITAL BUT THE LOCALS OF THE CITY ITSELF ARE VERY CRUCIAL. > > THANK YOU SIGNIFICANTLY FOR >> THAT RESPONSE. > > I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH BOTH OF THEM. WE DEMAND TO LEAVE THOSE KIND OF DECISIONS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD. NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT. BUT THE HISTORY, THE BLUNDERS OR WHAT ' S BEEN COMMITTED EARLIER. WE REQUIREMENT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT.WE REQUIREMENT TO SEE THAT IT IS DISCUSSED.
ACKNOWLEDGED. THE CHOICE OF THE NAME MAKING AS WELL AS THINGS LIKE THAT THAT NEED TO BE LEFT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY. > > Mike: BOBBY, THANKS REALLY MUCH FOR THAT CONCERN. >> WE WILL CERTAINLY PROCEED TO RICK ZAMPERIN FROM CHML. FAST INQUIRY AS WELL AS FAST RESPONSES. > > ONTARIO HAS A LARGE WORK SCARCITY WITH LIFE EVEN MORE UNAFFORDABLE NOW THAN EVER. IS A HIGHER LIVING WAGE A SIGNIFICANT CHOICE FOR ANY ONE OF THE CELEBRATIONS? I WILL START WITH MS. SANDHILL. > > FOR THAT SPECIFIC INQUIRY I WOULD REFER TO OUR FINANCIAL DIGNITY STRATEGY. THAT HAS A FEW OF THE IDEAL OPTIONS I HAVE SEEN TO ANY ISSUES THAT RELATE TO EMPLOYEES. WE ARE BRINGING LIVING WAGE. AT THE VERY SAME TIME WHETHER IT ' S MEDICAL CARE EMPLOYEES OR EDUCATION AND LEARNING EMPLOYEES WE ARE TRYING TO DO AWAY WITH EXPENSE 124 THAT CAPS THE WAGES OF WORKERS. WE ARE WANTING TO GET BENEFITS FOR WORKERS THAT OPERATE IN GIG ECONOMIC CLIMATE. IF WE TAKE A LOOK AT OUR ECONOMIC SITUATION DIGNITY STRATEGY THAT HAS LOTS OF INCENTIVES THEREIN, OBVIOUSLY, WE ARE BRINGING STANDARD EARNINGS PILOT PROJECT THAT WAS REDUCED BY THE CURRENT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN ONTARIO.OTHER THAN THAT I ASSUME MANY OF THE ADVANTAGES, PORTABLE BENEFITS, ARE ALSO CONSISTED OF IN THAT.
> > Mike: THANKS QUITE. THAT IS TIME. > > I WISH TO ADD JUST ONE POINT APART FROM SUPPORTING WHAT YOU >> WERE STATING. I WANT TO ADD WE NEED TO IMPLEMENT THE GIG WORKERS BILL OF RIGHT PLAN TO MAKE SURE THAT MUST DEAL WITH SEVERAL CONCERNS AROUND THE INQUIRY YOU HAD. > > Mike: AND MS. SHAW. > > I WOULD SAY A LOT OF United States WILL RECOGNIZE INDIVIDUALS ARE FUNCTIONING FULL-TIME FULL >> YEAR AT THE BASE PAY AS WELL AS> THEY ARE STILL WELL BELOW THE POVERTY LINE. WE NEED TO LOCATE A WAY TO ENSURE YOUNG PEOPLE HAVE GREAT PAYING TASKS. WE DEMAND TO ENSURE– WE SAW IT IN COVID AND SAW THE PART-TIME EMPLOYEES MAKING SUCH POOR EARNINGS. WE NEED TO ASSISTANCE THEM WITH NOT ONLY A RESPECTABLE WAGE BUT WE REQUIREMENT TO SUPPORT THEM WITH ADVANTAGES, PAID SICK DAYS. THAT THEY DESERVE NOTHING LESS AND ALSO WE NEED TO MAKE SURE WE ' RE RELOCATING YOUNGSTERS, PART-TIME WORKERS INTO GREAT TASKS WHERE THEY CONTAINER AFFORD TO ELEVATE a family members as well as live. > > Mike: THANKS QUITE FOR THAT. BACK BY POPULAR NEED, VAL COLE IS BACK. QUICK CONCERN, FAST ACTIONS FROM OUR CANDIDATES AS TIME IS BECOMING OUR ENEMY BELOW. > > THANKS. 3 OF THE 7 MEMBERS OF THE HAMILTON AUTHORITIES SERVICES BOARD ARE DESIGNATED BY THE PROVINCE. SHOULD YOUR EVENT BE CHOSEN WHAT CAPABILITIES >>, TRAINING AND ALSO EXPERIENCE CERTIFY AN CANDIDATE IN YOUR SIGHT TO BE APPOINTED TO OFFER ON THE BOARD? > > I WOULD SAY START WITH STATING THAT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT USES THE LENS TO A LOT OF OF THEIR POLICIES. AND ONTARIO LIBERAL EVENT SIMILARLY APPLIED EQUITY, VARIETY AND ADDITION LENS. I WOULD SAY IT IS REALLY CRUCIAL TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE EXPERTISE PEOPLE ARE OFFERING THE TABLE. IF THEY ' RE PORTION A COMMUNITY WHICH IS SO DIVERSE I ASSUME THAT VARIETY WITH SHOULD BE RECOLLECTED IN THE BOARD AS WELL.THAT ' S ONE OF MY BOTTOM LINE I WOULD SAY ABOUT OUR CURRENT AUTHORITIES SOLUTIONS BOARD. > > I HIGHLY CONCUR WITH HER ON THAT. VARIETY, HAMILTON HAS END UP BEING A DIVERSE CULTURE.
IT ' S A MULTICULTURAL SOCIETY NOW. THIS IS A TIME WE REQUIREMENT TO CONSIDER ANYTHING, ANY BOARD, ANYTHING, WE MUST HAVE THAT DEPICTION, REPRESENTING THE DIVERSITY HOW MUCH COMMUNITY. > > Mike: AS WELL AS MS. SHAW, FINAL QUESTION MOSTS LIKELY TO YOU. > > ABSOLUTELY. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS WERE DISAPPOINTED WITH THE LAST CONSULTATION. IT DIDN ' T SEEM TO SHOW THE DIVERSITY OF OUR COMMUNITY.> I UNDERSTAND THAT BLACK AND ALSO INDIGENOUS INDIVIDUALS IN OUR COMMUNITY WISH TO SEE THEMSELVES REFLECTED. WE REQUIREMENT APPOINTEES THAT HAVE LIVED EXPERIENCE AND ALSO UNDERSTAND THE DEPTH OF THE AREA AS WELL AS THEY CAN BRING THAT TO THE IMPORTANT ROLE OF POLICING AND ALSO WHEN THEY REFLECT INDIVIDUALS ' LIVED EXPERIENCES IT WILL AWAIT EVERYONE. > > SURVIVING FAST FIRE CONCERNS THERE.WONDERFUL REACTIONS AND ALSO, OBVIOUSLY, THAT IS ALL THE TIME WE HAVE NOW FOR OUR Q&A SESSION. ONCE MORE, THANKS SIGNIFICANTLY TO OUR PANEL FOR THIS DISPUTE. WE ONLY HAVE A FEW MINUTES LEFT CURRENTLY WITH OUR HAMILTON WEST-ANCASTER-DUNDAS CANDIDATES SO WE >> NECESSITY GO ON TO OUR CLOSING STATEMENTS.
GOING IN OPPOSITE ORDER FROM OUR OPENING ONE MIN EACH BEGINNING WITH SANDY SHAW OF THE NDP. > > THANK YOU. IT ' S BEEN A FANTASTIC CONVERSATION AS WELL AS I REALLY WISHED TO THANK THE HAMILTON JOURNALISTS FOR THOSE TRULY CHALLENGING QUESTIONS.IT ' S REALLY ESSENTIAL. YOU DO SUCH TERRIFIC WORK HERE. THANKS FOR THAT. 4 YEARS AGO I ASKED INDIVIDUALS OF HAMILTON WEST-ANCASTER-DUNDAS TO TURN OVER ME >> WITH THE SIGNIFICANT DUTY OF REPRESENTING THEM AT QUEEN ' S PARK. AS WELL AS EACH AND EVERY SINGLE DAY WHERE I INCREASED IN THE RESIDENCE I BROUGHT THEM WITH ME
. I THOUGHT ABOUT THEIR CONCERNS AND ALSO HOPES AS WELL AS DREAMS AS WELL AS I WATCHED A GOVERNMENT THAT WASN ' T REFLECTED OF THE MATTERS WE REQUIREMENT. I UNDERSTAND WE CANISTER DO SO MUCH BETTER. I KNOW WE CONTAINER BUILD A GREEN ECONOMY AND MAKE LIFE BUDGET FRIENDLY FOR THE INDIVIDUALS OF HAMILTON WEST-ANCASTER-DUNDAS. I HAVE TO SAY ON JUNE 3RD I UNDERSTAND WHAT MY TASK IS. THANK YOU FOR BELIEVE ME. > > Mike: THANK YOU SIGNIFICANTLY FOR THAT.MOVING ON THE LIBERAL PROSPECT'FOR THE LIBERAL CELEBRATION, SHUBHA SANDILL. > > THANKS TO THE CUSTOMERS AND ALSO WIRE 14 FOR ARRANGING THIS GREAT ARGUMENT. I ' M THANKFUL TO HAMILTON WEST-ANCASTER-DUNDAS RESIDENTS FOR MANY MONTHS OF CONSTRUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS ON THEIR DOORS ABOUT CLIMATE ACTIVITY, SELF-RESPECT STRATEGY >>, HEALTH CARE, EDUCATION AS WELL AS EVEN MORE.
ONTARIO REMAINS IN THE FIGHT FOR ITS LIFE TOGETHER WE CONTAINER CHANGE THE COURSE OF> ACTION IN OUR RIDING ON HEALTH CARE, SENIOR CARE, SMALL COMPANY ASSISTANCE, AFFORDABLE REAL ESTATE, CHILDCARE, EDUCATION AND LEARNING RECOVERY AND SETTING. AS WELL AS EVEN MORE BY CHOOSING AN ONTARIO LIBERAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. OUR COMMUNITY SHOULD HAVE A SOLID VOICE AT QUEEN ' S PARK ON JUNE 2ND. I WOULD BE HONOURED TO HAVE YOUR VOTE TO BE YOUR NEXT MPP FOR HAMILTON WEST-ANCASTER-DUNDAS. I ABSOLUTELY THINK THAT WITH EACH OTHER WE CONTAINER CONSTRUCT A BETTER FUTURE FOR GENERATIONS TO COME.THANK YOU A LOT. > > Mike: THANKS, MS. SANDHILL. FROM THE LIBERAL PARTY AND LASTLY SYAM CHANDRA FROM THE ECO-FRIENDLY PARTY. > > MANY THANKS A LOT. THANKS TO MY COLLEAGUES AND ALSO THANK YOU TO THE MEDIA BELOW. FOR ME LAST FEW WEEKS HAS BEEN REALLY FULFILLING. CONSULTING WITH A GREAT DEAL OF INDIVIDUALS HAVING LONG CONVERSATIONS. IT HAS BEEN MANY TERRIFIC TIME IN MY ENTIRE LIFE. WHEN I ' M ASKING FOR ASSISTANCE OF YOU
, FOR ME, I ' M SIGNIFICANT REGARDING IT. I ' M THINKING OF I ' LL BE THERE FOR YOU.THE ONLY PROMISE I CAN MAKE IS WHAT >> DECISION ARE YOU GUYS GOING TO TAKE ON JUNE 2ND. I ' LL BE THERE FOR YOU. I ' M ONLY A PHONE PHONE CALL AWAY. YOU CAN CALL ME WHENEVER. I ' LL BE THERE. I WILL TRAVEL TO FUNCTION FOR YOU MEN. I ' LL BE THERE FOR YOU CONSTANTLY THANKS. > > THANK YOU EXTREMELY MUCH. NATURALLY, MANY THANKS TO ALL OF YOUR CANDIDATES FOR THIS EVENING. WE APPRECIATE YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SHARE YOUR VIEWS AND ALSO SETTINGS AND ONCE MORE OUR HAMILTON WEST-ANCASTER-DUNDAS DISCUSSION HAS INCLUDED'THE NDP ' S SANDY SHAW, THE LIBERAL ' S SHUBHA SANDILL AND', CERTAINLY, THE ECO-FRIENDLY ' S SYAM CHANDRA. RUNNING IN HAMILTON WEST-ANCASTER-DUNDAS ARE LEE> WEISS FOR THE NEW BLUE EVENT, FRANK THIESSEN FOR THE ONTARIO EVENT AND ALSO FRED BENNINK OF THE COMPUTER PARTY.REGARDLESS OF THAT YOU SUPPORT PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO ELECT ON OR PRIOR TO THURSDAY JUNE 2ND WHEN POLLS WILL BE OPEN 9 A.M. TO 9 P.M. PROGRESSED SURVEYS ARE OPEN NOW AND LOCATIONS CANISTER BE FOUND ONLINE USING YOUR POSTAL CODE. NEXT UP HAMILTON CENTRE AIRING LIVE TUESDAY EVENING AT 7 P.M. RIGHT HERE ON WIRE 14. ALL OF OUR RELATED SOCIAL NETWORK PLATFORMS. ENSURE TO TWEET United States @ CABLE TELEVISION 14 OR E-MAIL [email protected] WITH ALL OF YOUR INQUIRIES
FOR HAMILTON CENTRE CANDIDATES OR ANY ONE OF YOUR VARIOUS OTHER DISPUTES HAPPENING NEXT WEEK. WE HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF THEM. SEE CABLE TELEVISION 14 ON POLITICAL ELECTION NIGHT FOR APPROXIMATELY DATE EVALUATIONS as well as outcomes. OUR PROGRAM WILL CERTAINLY BEGIN 8 P.M. THANKS AGAIN TO OUR CANDIDATES TONIGHT. OUR PANELISTS FROM THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR, CBC, CHCH AND THE HAMILTON NETWORK. AND ALSO THANKS FOR WATCHING THE HAMILTON NETWORK ' S HAMILTON WEST-ANCASTER-DUNDAS PROVINCIAL ELECTION DISCUSSION. I ' M MIKE TON OF MONEY. APPRECIATE THE VACATION! WE ' LL SEE YOU ONCE AGAIN TUESDAY NIGHT. [♪ ♪] [♪ ♪]
WE REQUIREMENT TO MAKE SURE OUR VULNERABLE ROAD USERS, OUR PEDESTRIANS– >> > > Mike: MS. SHAW, THAT IS YOUR TIME. > > THIS IS FOR SANDY SHAW. > > I TOTALLY AGREE WITH BOTH OF THEM. > > Mike: THANK YOU, MS. SANDHILL. > > THANK YOU REALLY MUCH.